Presentedby:-Dr.Manjula Gupta
Assistant Professor
Commerce
WORKERS PARTICIPATION IN MANAGEMENT
Meaning
Workers Participation is a
system where Workers
and Management share
important information with
each other and Participate
in decision manking.
Definition
 According to Keith Davis, “Workers’ participation
refers to the mental and emotional involvement of
a person in a group situation which encourages
him to contribute to group goals and share in
responsibility of achieving them”.
 In the words of Mehtras “Applied to industry, the
concept of participation means sharing the
decision-making power by the rank and file of an
industrial organisation through their
representatives, at all the appropriate levels of
management in the entire range of managerial
action”.
Characteristics:
The following are the main characteristics of WPM:
 1. Participation implies practices which increase the scope for
employees’ share of influence in decision-making process with
the assumption of responsibility.
 2. Participation presupposes willing acceptance of responsibility
by workers.
 3. Workers participate in management not as individuals but as a
group through their representatives.
 4. Worker’s participation in management differs from collective
bargaining in the sense that while the former is based on mutual
trust, information sharing and mutual problem solving; the latter
is essentially based on power play, pressure tactics, and
negotiations.
 5. The basic rationale tor worker’s participation in management
is that workers invest their Iabour and their fates to their place of
work. Thus, they contribute to the outcomes of organization.
Hence, they have a legitimate right to share in decision-making
activities of organisation.
Objectives
 1. Promote mutual understanding between
management and workers, i.e., industrial
harmony.
 2. Establish and encourage good communication
system at all levels.
 3. Create and promote a sense of belongingness
among workers.
 4. Help handle resistance to change.
 5. Induce a sense among workers to contribute
their best for the cause of organisation.
 6. Create a sense of commitment to decisions to
which they were a party
Levels of Participation
Having known the objectives of WPM, the question
then is to what extent workers can participate in
decision-making process. In other words, it is
important to know the extents/levels of co-
determination in an organisation. Following are the
levels of workers participation in management.
1. Informative Participation: This refers to
management’s information sharing with workers on
such items those are concerned with workers.
Balance Sheet, production, economic conditions of
the plant etc., are the examples of such items. It is
important to note that here workers have no right of
close scrutiny of the information provided and
management has its prerogative to make decisions on
Forms of Worker Participation
in India
 The form of WPM depends, to a great extent, on the
levels of participation. The reason being the forms of
participation attempt to achieve the objectives of
WPM set by an organisation. Hence, this deserves
mention. Now we, therefore, consider the well-known
forms of WPM adopted in organisations
 1. Suggestion Scheme: Under this scheme, a
suggestion committee is constituted consisting of
equal number of members from management and
workers. A suggestion box is installed at an
appropriate place in the organisation. Workers are
invited and encouraged to put their suggestions for
improving working of the organisation into the
suggestion box. The suggestion committee
periodically scrutinizes the suggestions given by the
workers. Good suggestions are accepted and
implemented and also rewarded. This encourages
workers to make more and better suggestions
 2 Works Committee: Under section 3 of the Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947, the appropriate Government may require an
enterprise employing 100 or more workers, to constitute a works
committee with equal number of representatives from the
employees and the management. The main purpose behind
Constituting works committees is to evolve ways and means for
maintaining cordial and harmonious relations between the
employees and the management.
 3. Joint Management Councils (JMCs): JMCs were introduced
first in 1958. These councils are formed at plant level with equal
number of representatives from employers and employees.
These are mainly consultative and advisory ones. Hence, neither
the workers nor the employers take them seriously. The
responsibility of the JMCs is relating to matters such as working
conditions, indiscipline, absenteeism, training, safety, accident
prevention, preparation of holiday schemes, etc. However, it was
alleged that JMCs and work committees appeared similar in their
scopes and functions. Further, multiplicity of bipartite consultative
bodies did not serve any purpose.
 4. Board Representation: Under this scheme, one or two
representatives of workers are nominated or elected on the Board of
Directors. The basic idea behind incorporating workers’ representation
10 on the Board of Directors is to safeguard the workers’ interest, usher
industrial harmony and good relations between the workers and
management. This is the highest form of workers’ participation in
management. The Government itself, as an employer, introduced this
scheme in several public sector enterprises such as Hindustan
Antibiotics Ltd., Hindustan Organic Chemicals Ltd., National Coal Mines
Development Corporation, Bharat Heavy Engineering Ltd., National
Textile Mills, etc. This scheme required the verification of trade union
membership, identification of the representative union and selection of a
worker director who is selected out of a penal of three persons furnished
to the government by the representative union within a prescribed
period. Subsequent to the nationalization of banks in 1970, the
Government, under the Nationalized Banks (Management and
Miscelleneous Provisions) Scheme 1970, introduced the nomination of
workers’ representatives as directors to the Boards — one representing
employees and the other representing officers for a tenure of 3 years.
According to a study of the scheme introduced in the nationalized banks
conducted by the National Labour Institute, the scheme has failed in its
objectives because of the contentions raised about the scheme by both
employees (trade unions) and employers.
 4. Administrative Participation: In the
administrative participation, decisions already
taken are implemented by the workers.
Compared to the former three levels of
participation, the degree of sharing authority and
responsibility by the workers is definitely more in
this participation.
 5. Decisive Participation: Here, the decisions
are taken jointly by the management and the
workers of an organisation. In fact, this is the
ultimate level of workers’ participation in
management.
 Co-partnership: Co-partnership means employees participation
in the share capital of their own company. Under this scheme,
workers are induced to buy equity shares of the company.
Workers may be allowed to make payments in instalments,
advanced loans or even give financial assistance to enable
workers to buy equity shares. Workers hold sixty-one per cent of
the shares of Otto India, Calcutta and forty-one per cent of the
shares of Sehgal Sanitary Fittings, Jalandhar, for example. As
shareholders, workers take part in the management by way of
electing their representatives to the Board of Directors. However,
the workers’ participation under this method is limited. Hence,
trade unions in India do not favour this scheme. Nonetheless,
workers’ participation in management through co-partnership
scheme was approved logical in India by the Supreme Court in
its judgement in Navneet R. Kamani vs. R.K.Kamani, in 1984, by
allowing workers to takeover a sick unit. Kamani Tubes, New
Central Jute Mills, Kamani Metals and Alloys, Powder Metals and
 Workers’ Complete Ownership: Under this
scheme, workers acquire complete control of
management of their enterprise through an
elected board or/and Workers’ Council. This
system of participation is also called "self
management." This prevails in Yugoslavia. In this
system, two different sets of persons perform two
distinct types of functions, namely, managerial
and operative. This system of participation is
characterised by virtues like workers’
identification with their organisations, loyalty and
responsibility to organisations, etc. This ushers in
industrial harmony and peace for the
organisation. Expectedly, trade unions favour this
form of workers’ participation in management.
 2. Consultative Participation: In this type of
participation, workers are consulted in those matters
which relate to them. Here, the role of workers is
restricted to give their views only. However the
acceptance and nonacceptance of these views
depends on management. Nonetheless, it provides an
opportunity to the workers to express their views on
matters involving their interest.
 Associative Participation: Here, the role of the
workers’ council is not just advisory unlike
consultative participation. In a way, this is an
advanced and improved form of consultative
participation. Now, the management is under a moral
obligation to acknowledge, accept and implement the
unanimous decision of the council.
 Alternative Forms of Participation : Besides
above, the following are the alternative forms of
workers’ participation in management:
 Collective Bargaining,
 Empowerment,
 Quality Circles
Thank you

workers_participation_in_Management.pptx

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Meaning Workers Participation isa system where Workers and Management share important information with each other and Participate in decision manking.
  • 3.
    Definition  According toKeith Davis, “Workers’ participation refers to the mental and emotional involvement of a person in a group situation which encourages him to contribute to group goals and share in responsibility of achieving them”.  In the words of Mehtras “Applied to industry, the concept of participation means sharing the decision-making power by the rank and file of an industrial organisation through their representatives, at all the appropriate levels of management in the entire range of managerial action”.
  • 4.
    Characteristics: The following arethe main characteristics of WPM:  1. Participation implies practices which increase the scope for employees’ share of influence in decision-making process with the assumption of responsibility.  2. Participation presupposes willing acceptance of responsibility by workers.  3. Workers participate in management not as individuals but as a group through their representatives.  4. Worker’s participation in management differs from collective bargaining in the sense that while the former is based on mutual trust, information sharing and mutual problem solving; the latter is essentially based on power play, pressure tactics, and negotiations.  5. The basic rationale tor worker’s participation in management is that workers invest their Iabour and their fates to their place of work. Thus, they contribute to the outcomes of organization. Hence, they have a legitimate right to share in decision-making activities of organisation.
  • 5.
    Objectives  1. Promotemutual understanding between management and workers, i.e., industrial harmony.  2. Establish and encourage good communication system at all levels.  3. Create and promote a sense of belongingness among workers.  4. Help handle resistance to change.  5. Induce a sense among workers to contribute their best for the cause of organisation.  6. Create a sense of commitment to decisions to which they were a party
  • 6.
    Levels of Participation Havingknown the objectives of WPM, the question then is to what extent workers can participate in decision-making process. In other words, it is important to know the extents/levels of co- determination in an organisation. Following are the levels of workers participation in management. 1. Informative Participation: This refers to management’s information sharing with workers on such items those are concerned with workers. Balance Sheet, production, economic conditions of the plant etc., are the examples of such items. It is important to note that here workers have no right of close scrutiny of the information provided and management has its prerogative to make decisions on
  • 7.
    Forms of WorkerParticipation in India  The form of WPM depends, to a great extent, on the levels of participation. The reason being the forms of participation attempt to achieve the objectives of WPM set by an organisation. Hence, this deserves mention. Now we, therefore, consider the well-known forms of WPM adopted in organisations  1. Suggestion Scheme: Under this scheme, a suggestion committee is constituted consisting of equal number of members from management and workers. A suggestion box is installed at an appropriate place in the organisation. Workers are invited and encouraged to put their suggestions for improving working of the organisation into the suggestion box. The suggestion committee periodically scrutinizes the suggestions given by the workers. Good suggestions are accepted and implemented and also rewarded. This encourages workers to make more and better suggestions
  • 8.
     2 WorksCommittee: Under section 3 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the appropriate Government may require an enterprise employing 100 or more workers, to constitute a works committee with equal number of representatives from the employees and the management. The main purpose behind Constituting works committees is to evolve ways and means for maintaining cordial and harmonious relations between the employees and the management.  3. Joint Management Councils (JMCs): JMCs were introduced first in 1958. These councils are formed at plant level with equal number of representatives from employers and employees. These are mainly consultative and advisory ones. Hence, neither the workers nor the employers take them seriously. The responsibility of the JMCs is relating to matters such as working conditions, indiscipline, absenteeism, training, safety, accident prevention, preparation of holiday schemes, etc. However, it was alleged that JMCs and work committees appeared similar in their scopes and functions. Further, multiplicity of bipartite consultative bodies did not serve any purpose.
  • 9.
     4. BoardRepresentation: Under this scheme, one or two representatives of workers are nominated or elected on the Board of Directors. The basic idea behind incorporating workers’ representation 10 on the Board of Directors is to safeguard the workers’ interest, usher industrial harmony and good relations between the workers and management. This is the highest form of workers’ participation in management. The Government itself, as an employer, introduced this scheme in several public sector enterprises such as Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd., Hindustan Organic Chemicals Ltd., National Coal Mines Development Corporation, Bharat Heavy Engineering Ltd., National Textile Mills, etc. This scheme required the verification of trade union membership, identification of the representative union and selection of a worker director who is selected out of a penal of three persons furnished to the government by the representative union within a prescribed period. Subsequent to the nationalization of banks in 1970, the Government, under the Nationalized Banks (Management and Miscelleneous Provisions) Scheme 1970, introduced the nomination of workers’ representatives as directors to the Boards — one representing employees and the other representing officers for a tenure of 3 years. According to a study of the scheme introduced in the nationalized banks conducted by the National Labour Institute, the scheme has failed in its objectives because of the contentions raised about the scheme by both employees (trade unions) and employers.
  • 10.
     4. AdministrativeParticipation: In the administrative participation, decisions already taken are implemented by the workers. Compared to the former three levels of participation, the degree of sharing authority and responsibility by the workers is definitely more in this participation.  5. Decisive Participation: Here, the decisions are taken jointly by the management and the workers of an organisation. In fact, this is the ultimate level of workers’ participation in management.
  • 11.
     Co-partnership: Co-partnershipmeans employees participation in the share capital of their own company. Under this scheme, workers are induced to buy equity shares of the company. Workers may be allowed to make payments in instalments, advanced loans or even give financial assistance to enable workers to buy equity shares. Workers hold sixty-one per cent of the shares of Otto India, Calcutta and forty-one per cent of the shares of Sehgal Sanitary Fittings, Jalandhar, for example. As shareholders, workers take part in the management by way of electing their representatives to the Board of Directors. However, the workers’ participation under this method is limited. Hence, trade unions in India do not favour this scheme. Nonetheless, workers’ participation in management through co-partnership scheme was approved logical in India by the Supreme Court in its judgement in Navneet R. Kamani vs. R.K.Kamani, in 1984, by allowing workers to takeover a sick unit. Kamani Tubes, New Central Jute Mills, Kamani Metals and Alloys, Powder Metals and
  • 12.
     Workers’ CompleteOwnership: Under this scheme, workers acquire complete control of management of their enterprise through an elected board or/and Workers’ Council. This system of participation is also called "self management." This prevails in Yugoslavia. In this system, two different sets of persons perform two distinct types of functions, namely, managerial and operative. This system of participation is characterised by virtues like workers’ identification with their organisations, loyalty and responsibility to organisations, etc. This ushers in industrial harmony and peace for the organisation. Expectedly, trade unions favour this form of workers’ participation in management.
  • 13.
     2. ConsultativeParticipation: In this type of participation, workers are consulted in those matters which relate to them. Here, the role of workers is restricted to give their views only. However the acceptance and nonacceptance of these views depends on management. Nonetheless, it provides an opportunity to the workers to express their views on matters involving their interest.  Associative Participation: Here, the role of the workers’ council is not just advisory unlike consultative participation. In a way, this is an advanced and improved form of consultative participation. Now, the management is under a moral obligation to acknowledge, accept and implement the unanimous decision of the council.
  • 14.
     Alternative Formsof Participation : Besides above, the following are the alternative forms of workers’ participation in management:  Collective Bargaining,  Empowerment,  Quality Circles
  • 15.