The document discusses the importance of witnesses in the criminal justice system and the need for a witness protection program in Punjab. It notes that witnesses often do not testify or retract their statements due to intimidation or threats. The draft Punjab Witness Protection Act of 2011 would establish a witness protection section to provide protective measures like new identities or relocation. The act outlines inclusion criteria, protections for judges and procedures, and penalties for violating witness protections. Overall, the document advocates for enacting the law and establishing a witness protection program in Punjab.
This document discusses the rules and principles regarding expert witnesses and examination of witnesses under the Indian Evidence Act 1872.
It defines an expert witness as a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a particular field who can provide opinion testimony to assist the court or factfinders. It outlines the prerequisites for expert testimony, including that the subject requires expert opinion and the witness is truly an expert. While expert opinions are advisory, courts are not bound by them.
The document also discusses different types of witnesses, the process of examining and cross-examining witnesses, relevant provisions around leading questions, refreshing a witness's memory, and prohibitions against indecent, scandalous, insulting or needlessly offensive questions.
The document discusses various articles related to burden of proof in legal cases. It outlines that the party who alleges or asserts a claim has the burden of proving that claim with evidence. It also discusses exceptions where the burden may lie with the other party in certain cases, such as when pleading an alibi or proving facts that are within special knowledge. The document provides examples and explanations for different articles governing burden of proof for particular facts, exceptions, ownership, legitimacy, and presumptions around relationships and death.
Procedure of investigation (Indian Perspective)Vaibhav Laur
The document summarizes the key sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) relating to investigation procedures in India. It explains that under Section 154, a First Information Report (FIR) must be filed for a cognizable offense, while a magistrate's order is required for a non-cognizable offense under Section 155(2). For a cognizable offense, a police officer has the power to investigate under Section 156, while Sections 157-173 outline the investigation process and requirements for submitting investigation reports. The document also discusses important investigation techniques like crime scene sketching and inspection.
This document defines and describes various types of witnesses that may testify in a court case. It discusses prosecution witnesses who support the prosecution's argument, defense witnesses called by the defending party, and expert witnesses with specialized knowledge or experience. It also outlines eye witnesses who observed the event, hostile witnesses who are unwilling to tell the truth, child witnesses whose ability to testify is evaluated, and dumb witnesses who communicate non-verbally. Further types covered are chance witnesses who happened to be present, accomplice witnesses involved in the crime, identification witnesses who saw the event, and interested witnesses with personal stakes in the outcome.
LLB LAW NOTES ON LAW OF EVIDENCE
FREE AFFIDAVITS AND NOTICES FORMATS
FREE AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS FORMATS
FREE LLB LAW NOTES
FREE CA ICWA NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIRST SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SECOND SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW THIRD SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FOURTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIFTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SIXTH SEM NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FOUNDATION NOTES
FREE CA ICWA INTERMEDIATE NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FINAL NOTES
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
A dying declaration is a statement made by a person who believes their death is imminent regarding the cause of their death or circumstances surrounding the incident that led to their death. Dying declarations can be oral, written, through gestures, or in response to questions, and are admissible as evidence in court without corroboration. Courts consider dying declarations reliable because a dying person is presumed to speak the truth. A dying declaration can be the sole basis for conviction if found genuine and voluntary by the court.
The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. It was incorporated against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in open fields, abandoned property, or areas impliedly open to the public. Searches generally require a warrant based on probable cause, though there are exceptions such as consent, exigent circumstances, and searches incident to arrest. Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is generally inadmissible due to the exclusionary rule.
This document discusses the rules and principles regarding expert witnesses and examination of witnesses under the Indian Evidence Act 1872.
It defines an expert witness as a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a particular field who can provide opinion testimony to assist the court or factfinders. It outlines the prerequisites for expert testimony, including that the subject requires expert opinion and the witness is truly an expert. While expert opinions are advisory, courts are not bound by them.
The document also discusses different types of witnesses, the process of examining and cross-examining witnesses, relevant provisions around leading questions, refreshing a witness's memory, and prohibitions against indecent, scandalous, insulting or needlessly offensive questions.
The document discusses various articles related to burden of proof in legal cases. It outlines that the party who alleges or asserts a claim has the burden of proving that claim with evidence. It also discusses exceptions where the burden may lie with the other party in certain cases, such as when pleading an alibi or proving facts that are within special knowledge. The document provides examples and explanations for different articles governing burden of proof for particular facts, exceptions, ownership, legitimacy, and presumptions around relationships and death.
Procedure of investigation (Indian Perspective)Vaibhav Laur
The document summarizes the key sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) relating to investigation procedures in India. It explains that under Section 154, a First Information Report (FIR) must be filed for a cognizable offense, while a magistrate's order is required for a non-cognizable offense under Section 155(2). For a cognizable offense, a police officer has the power to investigate under Section 156, while Sections 157-173 outline the investigation process and requirements for submitting investigation reports. The document also discusses important investigation techniques like crime scene sketching and inspection.
This document defines and describes various types of witnesses that may testify in a court case. It discusses prosecution witnesses who support the prosecution's argument, defense witnesses called by the defending party, and expert witnesses with specialized knowledge or experience. It also outlines eye witnesses who observed the event, hostile witnesses who are unwilling to tell the truth, child witnesses whose ability to testify is evaluated, and dumb witnesses who communicate non-verbally. Further types covered are chance witnesses who happened to be present, accomplice witnesses involved in the crime, identification witnesses who saw the event, and interested witnesses with personal stakes in the outcome.
LLB LAW NOTES ON LAW OF EVIDENCE
FREE AFFIDAVITS AND NOTICES FORMATS
FREE AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS FORMATS
FREE LLB LAW NOTES
FREE CA ICWA NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIRST SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SECOND SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW THIRD SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FOURTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIFTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SIXTH SEM NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FOUNDATION NOTES
FREE CA ICWA INTERMEDIATE NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FINAL NOTES
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
A dying declaration is a statement made by a person who believes their death is imminent regarding the cause of their death or circumstances surrounding the incident that led to their death. Dying declarations can be oral, written, through gestures, or in response to questions, and are admissible as evidence in court without corroboration. Courts consider dying declarations reliable because a dying person is presumed to speak the truth. A dying declaration can be the sole basis for conviction if found genuine and voluntary by the court.
The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. It was incorporated against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in open fields, abandoned property, or areas impliedly open to the public. Searches generally require a warrant based on probable cause, though there are exceptions such as consent, exigent circumstances, and searches incident to arrest. Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is generally inadmissible due to the exclusionary rule.
Examination of witnesses in criminal proceedings visnu.kSchin Dler
Witnesses in a criminal trial must take an oath before providing testimony. Their testimony is then recorded through a process of examination that includes examination-in-chief by the party calling the witness, cross-examination by the other party, re-examination, and potential questions from the court. Leading questions are generally not allowed during examination-in-chief but are allowed during cross-examination. The recorded testimony is signed by the witness after reading to confirm its accuracy.
A warrant is a written court order that commands law enforcement to arrest a person and bring them before a magistrate. A warrant must sufficiently identify the person, specify the offense charged, and be signed and sealed. A warrant remains in force until cancelled by the court. The court may direct that a person be released after arrest if security is taken, such as a bond with sureties, to ensure the person's attendance at a specified time. A warrant can be directed to police officers or other persons if there is a necessity for immediate arrest and no police officer is available. Upon arrest, the person must be brought without unnecessary delay before the court requiring their production. A warrant can be executed anywhere in Pakistan.
PRESUMPTIONS UNDER THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872.pptxisha423717
The document summarizes key sections of the Indian Evidence Act related to presumptions. It discusses the definitions of presumption and the different types - presumptions of fact and presumptions of law, which can be rebuttable or irrebuttable. It provides examples and explanations of key sections like Section 4, 105, 111-A, 113-A, 113-B and 114 that deal with presumptions that the court "may presume", "shall presume" or are "conclusive proof". The document analyzes the case laws and essential conditions required to invoke different presumptions under these sections related to abetment of suicide, dowry death, disturbed areas and possession of stolen goods.
If you face any problem regarding the research then you can communicate with me and I would appreciate your comments.
E-mail: devendrasrivastava36@gmail.com
divyashreenandini@gmail.com
Detailed Presentation on First Information Report (F.I.R)
Made By:
Edited By: Ayush Patria, Sangam University, Bhilwara
Follow us on Instagram: @law_laboratory
Website: www.lawlaboratory.in
The document summarizes India's Witness Protection Scheme from 2018. It discusses how witness protection was first referenced in India in 1958 and gained importance through various court cases. Witnesses often retracted statements due to threats, intimidation, and lack of protection measures. The Supreme Court finally approved a draft witness protection scheme in 2016.
The key aspects of the 2018 Scheme include categories of threat levels (A, B, C), application procedures, types of protection measures available (relocation, new identity, security), and operating a State Witness Protection Fund to finance implementation. The scheme aims to boost prosecutions by safeguarding witnesses through various confidentiality and security measures.
The document discusses the processes of investigation and trial of offences in India. It explains that the police register an FIR and conduct investigations upon receiving information about a cognizable offence. The police then files a police report with the statements and evidence collected before the local magistrate. The magistrate can then take cognizance of the case and either discharge the accused or frame charges and set a date to begin the trial and examination of prosecution and defense witnesses. After considering all evidence presented, the magistrate will then deliver a verdict of acquittal or conviction and determine the sentence if the accused is found guilty.
Dying declaration refers to a statement made by a person who believes they are dying about the cause of their impending death. It is considered reliable evidence in court under Indian law. A dying declaration must be recorded carefully, with questions and responses documented, in the presence of witnesses. It can be recorded by a magistrate, doctor, or other official if a magistrate is unavailable. The recorder must verify that the declarant is mentally sound and coherent. While a primary use is for murder cases, dying declarations must only describe the cause of the declarant's own death to be admissible in court.
Plea bargaining was introduced in India in 2005 to reduce delays in the criminal justice system. It allows the accused to plead guilty in exchange for concessions from the prosecutor, such as dropping or reducing charges. It aims to expedite case disposal and reduce court burdens. However, there are concerns it could encourage corruption, undermine the requirement of proof beyond reasonable doubt, and show undue leniency towards offenders. Overall, plea bargaining is still a new concept in India and its effectiveness in reducing backlogs and potential issues still need to be fully evaluated.
A dumb witness is someone who is unable to speak due to a physical deformity but can give evidence through other means such as writing or gestures in open court. Section 119 of the Indian Evidence Act allows for such evidence from dumb witnesses. The key requirements are that any writing must be written and any gestures or signs must be made during the court proceeding. As long as the witness can understand questions and respond, their evidence is admissible. An interpreter may be used to assist with communication when needed. Past cases have established that both the interpreter and witness must be sworn in when a deaf and dumb witness gives evidence through interpretation of their gestures.
The document discusses key concepts related to presumption and judicial notice in Malaysian law. It defines presumption as an inference drawn from known facts, and distinguishes between presumption of law and presumption of fact. It explains different types of presumptions under Malaysian law including those that the court "may presume", "shall presume", and those that constitute "conclusive proof". It also defines judicial notice as facts that a judge will notice without proof, and provides examples of facts that courts commonly take judicial notice of, such as identities of government leaders.
The document discusses the examination of witnesses in criminal trials under Indian evidence law. It explains that witness testimony is examined through examination-in-chief by the party calling the witness, cross-examination by the adverse party, and possible re-examination for clarification. Cross-examination seeks to test witness credibility and elicit favorable facts. A person producing a document is not themselves a witness subject to cross-examination.
Investigation with respect to the cognizable offence by police- FIR, Chargesh...Utkarsh Kumar
This document summarizes key aspects of criminal procedure and investigation in India according to the Criminal Procedure Code. It discusses:
1) The police's authority to investigate cognizable offenses without a court order or FIR. However, high courts can intervene if the FIR or materials do not disclose an offense.
2) Requirements for FIRs - they must be written, signed by the informant, and read back. FIRs provide the first information that sets the investigation in motion.
3) A magistrate's power to order an investigation under Section 156(3). However, they cannot direct how the investigation is conducted.
4) Irregularities in an investigation do not necessarily invalidate legal proceedings unless they cause a
The document summarizes Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code relating to information provided about cognizable offenses. It provides that any oral information about a cognizable offense must be reduced to writing by the officer in charge and signed by the informant. A copy must then be provided to the informant free of cost. If the information relates to certain sexual offenses, it must be recorded by a woman police officer. The section also describes procedures for persons with disabilities and allows complaints to be made to the Superintendent of Police if the officer in charge refuses to record the information. Key cases related to Section 154 and FIR procedures are also summarized.
Warrants are written orders issued by a judicial officer commanding a law enforcement officer to perform some act related to the administration of justice. There are several types of warrants including arrest warrants, which allow police to detain a suspect, and search warrants, which permit officers to search property for evidence of a crime. Warrants must be properly issued by a court and executed by law enforcement according to established legal procedures to be valid.
The document outlines the key steps and concepts in criminal prosecution in India according to the Criminal Procedure Code and other relevant laws. It discusses classes of criminal courts, registration of FIRs, investigation and arrest procedures, production of the accused before courts, police reports and charge sheets, trial procedures for both warrant and summons cases, and concepts like bail, cognizance, and judgments. The document provides a comprehensive overview of the criminal prosecution process in India from the registration of an FIR through investigation, trial and final judgment.
The document discusses the police's power of investigation in India according to the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). It provides an overview of the police's role in enforcing law and ensuring public safety. The key aspects of police investigation covered are gathering evidence, analyzing information, making reasonable conclusions, and arresting or charging suspects. The CrPC chapters and sections governing information given to police, their powers to investigate cognizable and non-cognizable cases, and the procedures around investigation, questioning witnesses, searches, and submitting investigation reports are summarized.
This document discusses the trial procedure for summons cases under the Code of Criminal Procedure in India. Summons cases involve less serious offenses punishable by up to 2 years imprisonment. The trial procedure for summons cases is simpler and less formal than for warrant cases. Key aspects of the summons case trial procedure include: recording a plea of guilty from the accused, allowing conviction in absentia for petty cases, acquitting the accused if the complainant does not appear, and case law rulings related to questioning of the accused and disclosure of defense. The discussion concludes that police need modification and social awareness training to fulfill objectives of protecting human rights and serving the welfare state.
The document defines and classifies criminal offences and criminal cases in the Malaysian legal system. It distinguishes between seizable and non-seizable offences, summon cases and warrant cases, bailable and non-bailable offences. It also distinguishes the stages of criminal litigation procedure - investigation conducted by police, inquiry conducted by magistrates, and trial conducted by courts. The criminal litigation process involves pre-trial procedures, jurisdiction of courts and police, bail applications, judgments, sentencing, and appeal procedures.
Pre trial proceedings (criminal) by zia ur rehmanzulfi799
This document summarizes key aspects of pre-trial criminal proceedings in Pakistan. It discusses the role and powers of magistrates in investigations, inquiries and trials. It outlines procedures for filing FIRs, complaints, police remand, seizure of evidence, and disposal of case property. Key sections of the criminal procedure code pertaining to investigations, bail applications, confessional statements, framing of charges, and pleas are referenced. Common mistakes made during pre-trial processes by police, prosecutors and magistrates are also highlighted.
Firstly, the document discusses whistleblowing and defines it as the release of information by an organization member or former member about illegal or unethical conduct within the organization.
Secondly, it outlines conditions for justified whistleblowing, including that the situation involves sufficient moral importance, the whistleblower has properly understood all facts and significance, and all internal channels have been utilized.
Thirdly, it discusses the Edward Snowden case, in which the computer analyst exposed top-secret NSA documents about US surveillance programs, and views him as a patriot rather than a traitor for prioritizing public interest over corporate and government laws.
The document discusses whistleblowing and provides examples of whistleblowers. It defines whistleblowing as raising concerns about misconduct within an organization. It discusses risks whistleblowers may face like losing their job. The Challenger disaster is used as a case study where engineers warned of O-ring failure but were ignored, leading to the explosion. Engineers like Roger Boisjoly faced demotion for blowing the whistle. In 2002, whistleblowers at Enron and WorldCom helped expose accounting fraud.
Examination of witnesses in criminal proceedings visnu.kSchin Dler
Witnesses in a criminal trial must take an oath before providing testimony. Their testimony is then recorded through a process of examination that includes examination-in-chief by the party calling the witness, cross-examination by the other party, re-examination, and potential questions from the court. Leading questions are generally not allowed during examination-in-chief but are allowed during cross-examination. The recorded testimony is signed by the witness after reading to confirm its accuracy.
A warrant is a written court order that commands law enforcement to arrest a person and bring them before a magistrate. A warrant must sufficiently identify the person, specify the offense charged, and be signed and sealed. A warrant remains in force until cancelled by the court. The court may direct that a person be released after arrest if security is taken, such as a bond with sureties, to ensure the person's attendance at a specified time. A warrant can be directed to police officers or other persons if there is a necessity for immediate arrest and no police officer is available. Upon arrest, the person must be brought without unnecessary delay before the court requiring their production. A warrant can be executed anywhere in Pakistan.
PRESUMPTIONS UNDER THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872.pptxisha423717
The document summarizes key sections of the Indian Evidence Act related to presumptions. It discusses the definitions of presumption and the different types - presumptions of fact and presumptions of law, which can be rebuttable or irrebuttable. It provides examples and explanations of key sections like Section 4, 105, 111-A, 113-A, 113-B and 114 that deal with presumptions that the court "may presume", "shall presume" or are "conclusive proof". The document analyzes the case laws and essential conditions required to invoke different presumptions under these sections related to abetment of suicide, dowry death, disturbed areas and possession of stolen goods.
If you face any problem regarding the research then you can communicate with me and I would appreciate your comments.
E-mail: devendrasrivastava36@gmail.com
divyashreenandini@gmail.com
Detailed Presentation on First Information Report (F.I.R)
Made By:
Edited By: Ayush Patria, Sangam University, Bhilwara
Follow us on Instagram: @law_laboratory
Website: www.lawlaboratory.in
The document summarizes India's Witness Protection Scheme from 2018. It discusses how witness protection was first referenced in India in 1958 and gained importance through various court cases. Witnesses often retracted statements due to threats, intimidation, and lack of protection measures. The Supreme Court finally approved a draft witness protection scheme in 2016.
The key aspects of the 2018 Scheme include categories of threat levels (A, B, C), application procedures, types of protection measures available (relocation, new identity, security), and operating a State Witness Protection Fund to finance implementation. The scheme aims to boost prosecutions by safeguarding witnesses through various confidentiality and security measures.
The document discusses the processes of investigation and trial of offences in India. It explains that the police register an FIR and conduct investigations upon receiving information about a cognizable offence. The police then files a police report with the statements and evidence collected before the local magistrate. The magistrate can then take cognizance of the case and either discharge the accused or frame charges and set a date to begin the trial and examination of prosecution and defense witnesses. After considering all evidence presented, the magistrate will then deliver a verdict of acquittal or conviction and determine the sentence if the accused is found guilty.
Dying declaration refers to a statement made by a person who believes they are dying about the cause of their impending death. It is considered reliable evidence in court under Indian law. A dying declaration must be recorded carefully, with questions and responses documented, in the presence of witnesses. It can be recorded by a magistrate, doctor, or other official if a magistrate is unavailable. The recorder must verify that the declarant is mentally sound and coherent. While a primary use is for murder cases, dying declarations must only describe the cause of the declarant's own death to be admissible in court.
Plea bargaining was introduced in India in 2005 to reduce delays in the criminal justice system. It allows the accused to plead guilty in exchange for concessions from the prosecutor, such as dropping or reducing charges. It aims to expedite case disposal and reduce court burdens. However, there are concerns it could encourage corruption, undermine the requirement of proof beyond reasonable doubt, and show undue leniency towards offenders. Overall, plea bargaining is still a new concept in India and its effectiveness in reducing backlogs and potential issues still need to be fully evaluated.
A dumb witness is someone who is unable to speak due to a physical deformity but can give evidence through other means such as writing or gestures in open court. Section 119 of the Indian Evidence Act allows for such evidence from dumb witnesses. The key requirements are that any writing must be written and any gestures or signs must be made during the court proceeding. As long as the witness can understand questions and respond, their evidence is admissible. An interpreter may be used to assist with communication when needed. Past cases have established that both the interpreter and witness must be sworn in when a deaf and dumb witness gives evidence through interpretation of their gestures.
The document discusses key concepts related to presumption and judicial notice in Malaysian law. It defines presumption as an inference drawn from known facts, and distinguishes between presumption of law and presumption of fact. It explains different types of presumptions under Malaysian law including those that the court "may presume", "shall presume", and those that constitute "conclusive proof". It also defines judicial notice as facts that a judge will notice without proof, and provides examples of facts that courts commonly take judicial notice of, such as identities of government leaders.
The document discusses the examination of witnesses in criminal trials under Indian evidence law. It explains that witness testimony is examined through examination-in-chief by the party calling the witness, cross-examination by the adverse party, and possible re-examination for clarification. Cross-examination seeks to test witness credibility and elicit favorable facts. A person producing a document is not themselves a witness subject to cross-examination.
Investigation with respect to the cognizable offence by police- FIR, Chargesh...Utkarsh Kumar
This document summarizes key aspects of criminal procedure and investigation in India according to the Criminal Procedure Code. It discusses:
1) The police's authority to investigate cognizable offenses without a court order or FIR. However, high courts can intervene if the FIR or materials do not disclose an offense.
2) Requirements for FIRs - they must be written, signed by the informant, and read back. FIRs provide the first information that sets the investigation in motion.
3) A magistrate's power to order an investigation under Section 156(3). However, they cannot direct how the investigation is conducted.
4) Irregularities in an investigation do not necessarily invalidate legal proceedings unless they cause a
The document summarizes Section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code relating to information provided about cognizable offenses. It provides that any oral information about a cognizable offense must be reduced to writing by the officer in charge and signed by the informant. A copy must then be provided to the informant free of cost. If the information relates to certain sexual offenses, it must be recorded by a woman police officer. The section also describes procedures for persons with disabilities and allows complaints to be made to the Superintendent of Police if the officer in charge refuses to record the information. Key cases related to Section 154 and FIR procedures are also summarized.
Warrants are written orders issued by a judicial officer commanding a law enforcement officer to perform some act related to the administration of justice. There are several types of warrants including arrest warrants, which allow police to detain a suspect, and search warrants, which permit officers to search property for evidence of a crime. Warrants must be properly issued by a court and executed by law enforcement according to established legal procedures to be valid.
The document outlines the key steps and concepts in criminal prosecution in India according to the Criminal Procedure Code and other relevant laws. It discusses classes of criminal courts, registration of FIRs, investigation and arrest procedures, production of the accused before courts, police reports and charge sheets, trial procedures for both warrant and summons cases, and concepts like bail, cognizance, and judgments. The document provides a comprehensive overview of the criminal prosecution process in India from the registration of an FIR through investigation, trial and final judgment.
The document discusses the police's power of investigation in India according to the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). It provides an overview of the police's role in enforcing law and ensuring public safety. The key aspects of police investigation covered are gathering evidence, analyzing information, making reasonable conclusions, and arresting or charging suspects. The CrPC chapters and sections governing information given to police, their powers to investigate cognizable and non-cognizable cases, and the procedures around investigation, questioning witnesses, searches, and submitting investigation reports are summarized.
This document discusses the trial procedure for summons cases under the Code of Criminal Procedure in India. Summons cases involve less serious offenses punishable by up to 2 years imprisonment. The trial procedure for summons cases is simpler and less formal than for warrant cases. Key aspects of the summons case trial procedure include: recording a plea of guilty from the accused, allowing conviction in absentia for petty cases, acquitting the accused if the complainant does not appear, and case law rulings related to questioning of the accused and disclosure of defense. The discussion concludes that police need modification and social awareness training to fulfill objectives of protecting human rights and serving the welfare state.
The document defines and classifies criminal offences and criminal cases in the Malaysian legal system. It distinguishes between seizable and non-seizable offences, summon cases and warrant cases, bailable and non-bailable offences. It also distinguishes the stages of criminal litigation procedure - investigation conducted by police, inquiry conducted by magistrates, and trial conducted by courts. The criminal litigation process involves pre-trial procedures, jurisdiction of courts and police, bail applications, judgments, sentencing, and appeal procedures.
Pre trial proceedings (criminal) by zia ur rehmanzulfi799
This document summarizes key aspects of pre-trial criminal proceedings in Pakistan. It discusses the role and powers of magistrates in investigations, inquiries and trials. It outlines procedures for filing FIRs, complaints, police remand, seizure of evidence, and disposal of case property. Key sections of the criminal procedure code pertaining to investigations, bail applications, confessional statements, framing of charges, and pleas are referenced. Common mistakes made during pre-trial processes by police, prosecutors and magistrates are also highlighted.
Firstly, the document discusses whistleblowing and defines it as the release of information by an organization member or former member about illegal or unethical conduct within the organization.
Secondly, it outlines conditions for justified whistleblowing, including that the situation involves sufficient moral importance, the whistleblower has properly understood all facts and significance, and all internal channels have been utilized.
Thirdly, it discusses the Edward Snowden case, in which the computer analyst exposed top-secret NSA documents about US surveillance programs, and views him as a patriot rather than a traitor for prioritizing public interest over corporate and government laws.
The document discusses whistleblowing and provides examples of whistleblowers. It defines whistleblowing as raising concerns about misconduct within an organization. It discusses risks whistleblowers may face like losing their job. The Challenger disaster is used as a case study where engineers warned of O-ring failure but were ignored, leading to the explosion. Engineers like Roger Boisjoly faced demotion for blowing the whistle. In 2002, whistleblowers at Enron and WorldCom helped expose accounting fraud.
This document discusses whistleblowing, including its definition, purpose, types, characteristics of whistleblowers, stages of whistleblowing, guidelines for whistleblowing, potential effects, and legal protections. Whistleblowing involves calling attention to wrongdoing, typically to prevent harm. It aims to draw attention to unethical conduct and protect ethical values over self-interest. Whistleblowers risk retaliation but feel compelled to disclose wrongdoing. Laws like the Whistleblower Protection Act aim to protect those who undertake whistleblowing.
Challenges in Implimentation of Victims' RightsLangrial
This document outlines challenges in implementing victims' rights and proposes solutions. It discusses general challenges like lack of political will and funding. It also examines specific challenges faced by victims, the criminal justice system, and victim support organizations. These include emotional trauma for victims, lack of awareness and training for legal professionals, and fragmented victim services. The document concludes by recommending steps like building capacity, coordinating support, and dedicating resources to advance victims' rights.
Victim Protection in Sri Lanka: An Analysis of the Existing Laws in Relation ...bhagya913
An Analysis of the existing laws on victim protection in relation to the victims of offences of gender based violence in Sri Lanka, along with the existing international standards.
Whistleblowing and Whistleblower Protection Act. ICC Guidelines on Whistleblowing. Should the whisteblowing act be extended in the private sector?
I have uploaded it in the pdf format.
Here are the options available to the executive and the potential consequences of each:
1. Do nothing. Consequences are ongoing pollution harming the environment and public health. The executive would be complicit.
2. Report internally. The company may ignore or cover up the issue to avoid liability. Pollution continues.
3. Report to state regulators anonymously. Regulators may be unable to prove the claim without a named whistleblower. Pollution continues.
4. Publicly blow the whistle. The executive risks retaliation like firing, lawsuits, harassment. However, this has the best chance of exposing wrongdoing and stopping the pollution.
The executive should publicly blow the whistle. While risky, it is the
Business Ethics - Whistleblowing and Employee LoyaltyRetno Nindya
The document discusses the concept of whistleblowing and employee loyalty. It explores the debate around whether employees owe a duty of loyalty to their employer or if whistleblowing is permissible when misconduct threatens public interest. While some view loyalty as devotion to an organization, others argue loyalty is only owed to individuals, not abstract entities like companies. The document also examines how companies prioritize profit over individuals and whether whistleblowing is expected when harm is done to society.
The document discusses perception, whistleblowing, and a case study involving whistleblower Douglas Durand. It provides definitions of perception and whistleblowing. It describes Durand blowing the whistle on pharmaceutical company TAP for illegal kickbacks. Though initially vindicated, holes later emerged in Durand's story and TAP was cleared of charges. The document performs a SWOT analysis of whistleblowers and concludes that while whistleblowing can prevent wrongdoing, frivolous lawsuits may discourage valid claims. It asks questions about whether whistleblowers should report internally first and how such cases should be evaluated.
The document discusses whistleblowing and provides guidance on when and how to blow the whistle. It defines whistleblowing as raising concerns about misconduct within an organization. There are different types of whistleblowing like internal (within the organization) or external (going public). Whistleblowers should have documented evidence and exhaust internal reporting procedures before going public. The document also discusses challenges whistleblowers may face like retaliation and the psychological toll it can take. Case studies of whistleblowers from NASA and India are provided to illustrate the risks and impacts of blowing the whistle.
Whistleblowing involves drawing public attention to wrongdoing in order to prevent harm. There are different types of whistleblowing, including internal (within an organization), personal (against an individual), and external (against an organization). Whistleblowers are rarely seen as heroes by coworkers due to doubts about their loyalty and perceptions that they have damaged the organization. For whistleblowing to be morally permissible, the organization's actions must pose serious harm, concerns must first be reported internally, and all internal procedures must be exhausted. For it to be obligatory, there must also be documented evidence and a reasonable chance that going public will create necessary changes. Physical harm poses a higher obligation than only financial harm.
Whistleblowing involves informing on wrongdoing within an organization, such as violations of law or regulations, corruption, or risks to health and safety. The misconduct may be reported internally or externally. Whistleblowers aim to protect the public, colleagues, and others, but they also face potential retaliation from management and conflicts of interest between their duties to the company and protecting the public. Whistleblowing can increase shareholder confidence, enhance corporate social responsibility, protect all interests, reduce risk exposure, prevent injuries, and ensure legal compliance.
ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN LIMITING WITNESS INTIMIDATION.pptxAnanyaKarnwal1
Witnesses are important in the judicial system for determining facts accurately, but instances of intimidation have made them wary of the criminal justice system. This compromises justice when witnesses refuse to cooperate. The judiciary aims to limit witness intimidation through various means. Analysis of witness protection schemes shows that aspects like funding distribution, potential for undue influence, lack of deterrence, and scope of protection need improvement to better safeguard witnesses.
This document discusses managing risks in fraud investigations from the investigation stage through litigation. It covers major topics like fraud investigation, risks and risk management, duties and rights during investigations, search and seizure laws, private actions against investigators, and rights under criminal law. The role of fraud investigators as expert witnesses in court is also examined. Effective fraud investigations and managing risks requires understanding legal procedures and protecting suspect rights while gathering strong evidence that can withstand scrutiny in court.
Victim and witness protection in transitional justice processesSantosh Sigdel
Victim and witness protection is an important aspect of transitional justice processes. This slide covers international provisions relating to victim and witness protection, as well as Nepali provisions and its scope within ongoing TJ process.
The document discusses rules of arrest under Philippine national law. It defines arrest and outlines the differences between civil and criminal law. There are two types of arrest - arrest with a warrant and warrantless arrest. When making an arrest, officers must respect the custodial rights of suspects. After arrest, a suspect can only be detained for a certain period of time depending on the crime before they must be charged. A preliminary investigation is also usually required before filing a complaint in court. The document outlines the rights of the accused during this investigation and trial.
This document discusses the right to bail in Bangladeshi law. It defines bail as the release of a person charged with an offence upon signing an undertaking to appear in court. Bail can be granted for bailable offences by police or courts and is meant to balance the accused's liberty with ensuring their appearance at trial. The document outlines the categories of offences, conditions for granting bail, relevant authorities, and roles of police, prosecutors and judges. It also discusses cancellation of bail and reforms needed in the bail system.
This document provides information about a course titled "PC-CDI3 Specialized Crime Investigation 2 (with Simulation on Interrogation and Interview)". The course focuses on constitutional rights of those under investigation or arrest. It covers conducting interviews and interrogations of suspects, witnesses, and persons of interest. Topics include arrest, search and seizure, extrajudicial confessions, differences between interviews and interrogations, interrogation techniques, and psychological signs of guilt. The course also involves simulations of investigating different crimes against persons and property.
This document discusses criminal investigation techniques. It defines criminal investigation as dealing with identifying and locating the offender through legal proceedings to provide evidence of guilt. The key points of criminal investigation are determining what offense was committed, how, by whom, where, when and why. The document outlines techniques for gathering information through various sources, conducting interviews and interrogations, using physical evidence and instrumentation, and identifying criminals through confessions, eyewitness accounts and other evidence. It emphasizes the importance of training investigators and following legal guidelines like the Miranda doctrine during interrogations.
Mitigation and Sentencing in Criminal Litigation.pptxEvansLyght
Mitigation and Sentencing
Mitigation is the action of reducing the severity or seriousness of a penalty to an accused persons whilst sentencing is the action of writing down a record of an accused person to serve for a crime he committed
This document outlines the duties and rights of witnesses in criminal proceedings under Ukrainian law. It notes that witnesses are obligated to appear when summoned, testify truthfully, and keep confidential case information learned as a witness. Failure to appear can result in monetary penalties. Good causes to miss a summons include illness, force majeure events, or being abroad. The document provides guidance on what to do upon being summoned, such as notifying the summoning party and bringing identification. It also describes protections for underage witnesses and the criminal liability associated with interfering with witnesses or providing false testimony.
INVESTIGATIONS AND THE TRIAL PROCEDURE IN UGANDA 2Kakuru Joel
This document discusses investigations and the criminal trial process in Uganda. It covers:
- Investigations are carried out by the police to collect evidence and place the accused at the scene of the crime. Different investigation methods are used depending on the crime.
- The stages of a criminal trial in a magistrate's court, including plea taking, prosecution presenting their case, defense presenting their case, judgement, and appeals.
- The stages are similar in the high court but begin with preliminary proceedings like drawing up an indictment.
- Some miscellaneous applications that can be made during the trial like bail applications, habeas corpus if the accused is not produced in court.
- A successful investigation is important to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and
The document summarizes key procedural justice protections in the U.S. criminal justice system, including that defendants are innocent until proven guilty, illegally obtained evidence cannot be used, and defendants have rights to fair procedures during arrest and trial. It discusses the role of prosecutors in charging decisions, the use of grand juries and indictments, rights to reasonable bail and counsel. The protections are designed to protect the innocent and ensure a fair process between arrest and trial.
Protection of witness;comparitive studyAkash Kishore
This document provides an overview of witness protection laws in India and other countries. It begins with an introduction noting the lack of specific witness protection legislation in India. It then discusses hostile witnesses and landmark cases. Next, it examines legal provisions for witness protection in countries like Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, and South Korea. The document outlines some provisions for witness protection under Indian law such as the Code of Criminal Procedure and anti-terrorism laws. Finally, it discusses how protection of witnesses is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Indian Constitution.
1. Crime scene investigation involves collecting and analyzing forensic evidence to help solve crimes.
2. A crime scene provides clues that can help identify suspects, reconstruct events, and determine guilt or innocence in court.
3. Proper collection, documentation, and preservation of evidence is important for maintaining chain of custody and establishing the credibility of forensic analysis.
Chapter 21 - The Investigator and the Legal System1.docxwalterl4
Chapter 21 - The Investigator and the Legal System
1
The decisions investigators must make involve a great deal of discretion.
Investigators must consider what may be termed risk factors.
2
Investigators must consider what may be termed risk factors.
Some police officers and criminal investigators are not fully aware of the order in
3
which a trial is conducted because time often prohibits them from attending a
complete trail from beginning to end. Also, witnesses are often sequestered from
the courtroom before and after giving testimony. This very common practice is used
to minimize the possibility that a witness’s testimony might be affected by other
witnesses’ testimony.
The courtroom process begins with the selection and swearing in of a jury. Jury
selection can last a few hours or a few weeks, depending on the selection process
and the nature of the case. The jury panel from whom the jurors in the trial will
eventually be picked is called a venire.
The steps in the trial process include: direct examination, cross-examination,
redirect examination, re-cross examination, the rebuttal, surrebuttal, and closing
arguments.
Evidence can be defined as anything that tends logically to prove or disprove
a fact at issue in a judicial case or controversy.
4
a fact at issue in a judicial case or controversy.
The rules of evidence are designed primarily to keep a jury from hearing or
seeing improper evidence, and the first rule of evidence is designed to set
parameters on the above definition of evidence.
Proof may be defined as the combination of all those facts—of all the evidence—in
5
determining the guilt or innocence of a person accused of a crime.
The pie chart above illustrates how several different pieces of evidence can
be put together in order to constitute proof of guilt.
6
be put together in order to constitute proof of guilt.
The doctrine of judicial notice is an evidentiary shortcut. Judicial notice is designed
7
to speed up the trial and eliminate the necessity of formally proving the truth of a
particular matter when the truth is not in dispute.
Direct Evidence
8
Direct evidence usually is the testimony of witnesses that ties the defendant
directly to the commission of the crime, such as the testimony of an
eyewitness who can positively state that the defendant committed the crime.
Real Evidence
Sometimes referred to as “physical evidence,” real evidence is connected
with the commission of the crime and can be produced in court.
Demonstrative Evidence
Demonstrative, or illustrative, evidence is not identical to real evidence even
though the items introduced are tangible. It consists of maps, diagrams,
sketches, photographs, tape recordings, videotapes, X-rays, and visual tests
and demonstrations produced to assist witnesses in explaining their
testimony.
Circumstantial Evidence
9
It is a myth that one cannot be convicted of a crime solely o.
The document discusses various topics related to witness preparation by lawyers. It notes that witness preparation is not directly regulated and there is little case law or scholarly literature on the topic. While lawyers have a duty to zealously represent clients, they cannot knowingly assist witnesses to testify falsely or commit perjury. The document discusses challenges around distinguishing proper witness preparation from improper coaching. It also discusses techniques used in witness preparation like "the lecture" and debates around simultaneous witness interviews. Overall, the document examines the ethical boundaries and gray areas of lawyers preparing witnesses for testimony or deposition.
1. The criminal investigation process allows police to gather sufficient evidence to support charges against suspected criminals. Police have powers to search, seize evidence, and question suspects to build strong cases.
2. However, not all reported crimes are fully investigated due to limited resources, and the lengthy investigation process can delay justice. Some crimes may not be pursued even when reported.
3. While technology like DNA evidence has helped solve difficult cases, an over-reliance on certain types of evidence alone could risk wrongful convictions. A thorough investigation considers multiple forms of lawful evidence.
WITNESSES-COMPETENCE AND EXAMINATION.pptxssuser775c16
This document provides an overview of witnesses and witness testimony in Indian law. It discusses who can be a witness, including child witnesses and dumb witnesses. It explains that witnesses must generally only state facts they personally observed, though there are exceptions. It also discusses hostile witnesses and reasons why witnesses may turn hostile, such as threats or monetary inducements. The document outlines relevant provisions of Indian evidence law regarding witnesses and concludes by listing different types of witnesses.
Narcoanalysis involves administering truth serums to render subjects in a semi-conscious state for interrogation. It aims to neutralize imagination and obtain probative truths, but risks violating rights against self-incrimination. While proponents argue it elicits honest answers, critics note it is inaccurate and coercive. Indian courts have ruled it violates privacy and amounts to cruel punishment under Articles 20(3) and 21 of the constitution. The Supreme Court allows information indirectly discovered from voluntary tests as evidence but otherwise prohibits compelled narcoanalysis.
Good practice in witness protection legislationEUROsociAL II
The document provides guidance on good practices for witness protection legislation based on international standards and country examples. It discusses that witness protection programs are an important tool for law enforcement and anti-corruption efforts by encouraging witnesses to testify without fear of intimidation. Key recommendations for legislation include specifying the authority responsible, admission criteria, protection measures, rights and obligations of parties, and penalties for disclosure of protected information. The scope of coverage should include witnesses, victims, experts and related persons for corruption and other serious crimes. Legislation should also consider including protections for whistleblowers and informants in some circumstances.
WITNESSES-COMPETENCE AND EXAMINATION.pptxAkashTandon19
The document discusses witnesses and witness testimony in legal proceedings. It defines a witness as someone who sees, knows, or vouches for something relevant to a court case. Witnesses can be competent to testify unless prevented by factors like age or mental state. There are different types of witnesses including eyewitnesses, expert witnesses, and hostile witnesses who change their testimony. The examination of witnesses includes chief examination, cross-examination, and re-examination. Certain provisions of the Indian Evidence Act govern competence, examination, and credibility of witnesses, who are important for seeking justice in legal cases.
3. SEQUENCE
33
Importance of Witnesses in CJS.
Why witnesses do not testify or retract their statements ?
Need for Witness Protection Law.
Witness Protection Methods.
Witness Protection Issues.
Punjab Witness Protection Act 2011.
Way Forward.
4. Importance of Witnesses
44
Witnesses are the cornerstones of successful Criminal
Justice Systems.
Witness is an indispensable aid in the justice dispensation
system. They are the “eyes and ears of justice”.
Protection of witnesses from intimidation or threats due to
cooperation with law enforcement or judicial authorities is
critical to the maintenance of the rule of law.
Witness protection programs are a key tool in dismantling
the organized crime networks.
5. Importance of Witnesses
55
Criminal Justice System does not work fluently to result
in prompt determination of guilt or innocence of accused.
Prosecution witnesses retract from statements made
earlier to the police or turn hostile in the Court.
Witnesses turn hostile in cases involving heinous crimes
or high profile personalities due to external pressures.
Witnesses protection issues came under scrutiny after
acquittal of hard core terrorists.
6. Why Witnesses do not Testify or retract their
Statements ?
66
Police do not record the statements correctly.
Police record the statements correctly but were retracted
by the witnesses because of “intimidation and other
methods of manipulation”.
Protracted trials. Several dates for cross examination of
witnesses resulting in frustration.
Unsympathetic attitude of the police.
Corruption in all segments of Criminal Justice System
Absence of Witness Protection Programme.
7. Witnesses Protection Law - Need of the Hour
77
No comprehensive law for the protection of witnesses in
Pakistan. Sec. 21 of ATA 1997 and article 146 & 148 of
Qanoon-e- Shahdat Order 1984 which protect the
witnesses from being asked indecent, scandalous,
offensive, annoying or insulting questions.
Witness Protection Laws exist in almost all the developed
countries and number of developing countries.
Need to draft and promulgate and implement Witness
Protection Law.
8. Witnesses Protection Methods
88
Target Hardening:
Temporary change of residence to a relative’s house or a
nearby town;
Close protection, regular patrolling around the witness’s
house, escort to and from the court and provision of
emergency contacts;
Arrangement with the telephone company to change the
witness’s telephone number or assign him or her an
unlisted telephone number;
9. Witnesses Protection Methods
99
Target Hardening:
Monitoring of mail and telephone calls;
Installation of security devices in the witness’s home (such
as security doors, alarms or fencing);
Minimizing of public contacts with uniformed police;
Provision of electronic warning devices;
Provision of mobile telephones with emergency numbers;
Use of discreet premises to interview and brief the witness.
10. Witnesses Protection Methods
10
10
Procedural Witness Protection
Use of a witness’s pretrial statement instead of in-court
testimony;
Testimony via closed-circuit television or videoconferencing;
Voice and face distortion;
Removal of the defendant or the public from the courtroom;
Partial or fully anonymous testimony (use of pseudonym).
Presence of an accompanying person for psychological
support;
11. Witnesses Protection Methods
11
11
Self Protection
In absence of an established WPP, refusal of the witness to
enter witness protection or lack of eligibility criteria:
witnesses may be offered support to look after their own
protection.
in cases of low threat, a lump-sum payment may be offered
to witnesses to assist them in their own resettlement.
12. Witnesses Protection Methods
12
12
Self Protection
Respective authorities may facilitate and assist with the
move without any responsibility.
No formal agreement or memorandum of understanding
between the parties.
Authorities focus on instilling in witnesses a feeling of
security.
13. Witnesses Protection Issues
13
13
Balancing of the interests of the prosecution in protecting
the witness and the rights of the accused.
Importance of an open trial.
Rights of the accused in knowing who is testifying against
him
Section 512 of Cr.PC gives few exceptions if the accused
is not available or has absconded and cannot be found by
reasonable means, then the court can order the witnesses
to testify in the absence of the accused.
14. Witnesses Protection Issues
14
14
Costs of implementation and infrastructure for Witness
Protection Programme.
Careful selection of cases that merit protection like: high
profile, communally charged, involving drugs or organised
crime syndicates or cases involving grave offences and
terrorism cases.
Corruption in all segments of Criminal Justice System-
vulnerabilities of protected witnesses (false identities,
relocation etc)
15. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
15
15
A basic draft of Punjab Witness Protection Act 2011 has
been prepared.
Provincial Police Officer, Punjab to establish Witness
Protection Section in the Police Department.
PPO,CPO or DPO to decide the witness and the kind of
witness protection measures needed.
District & Sessions Judge to approve the protective
measures on the request of concerned officer.
16. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
16
16
Witness Protection Measures (Sec.3).
Protective Measures may include the following;
o making arrangements necessary:
to allow the witness to establish a new identity; or
otherwise to protect the witness;
o relocating the witness;
o providing accommodation for the witness;
o providing transport for the property of the witness;
o providing reasonable financial assistance to the witness;
o permitting any person involved in WPP to use an assumed name
in carrying out duties and to have supporting documentation.
17. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
17
17
Witness Protection Measures (Sec.3).
o doing any other things necessary to ensure the safety of the
witness;
o taking any of the steps for a foreign witness present in Punjab
pursuant to an agreement between Pakistan and a foreign State
relating to witness protection.
o PPO,CPO or DPO shall not obtain documentation for a witness
participating in WPP that represents that the participant has a
qualification that he or she does not have, or is entitled to a benefit
that he or she is not entitled to;
18. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
18
18
Parameters for Inclusion the in WPP (Sec.4)
Seriousness of the offence to which the statement or evidence of
the witness relates;
Nature and importance of that statement or evidence;
Nature of the perceived danger to the witness;
Nature of the witness’s relationship to any other witness being
assessed for inclusion in the programme;
Results of any psychological or psychiatric examination or
evaluation of the witness conducted to determine his or her
suitability for inclusion in the programme;
19. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
19
19
Parameters for Inclusion the in WPP (Sec.4)
Are there any viable alternative methods of protecting the witness;
Whether the witness has a criminal record, particularly in respect of
violent crime, which indicates a risk to the public if he or she is
included in the programme.
A witness shall not be included in a Witness Protection Programme
unless the witness, or a person legally responsible for the person,
agrees in writing to be included in the programme.
20. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
20
20
Protection of Judges, Counsels, Prosecutors & Persons
concerned with Court Proceedings (Sec. 6)
The Court may order such measures for the protection of a
judge, public prosecutor, counsel and other persons
concerned with the proceedings for an offence, which may
also include the following :
In-camera proceedings or restricted entry to prevent crowding or
storming of the court to intimidate the judge or to create a
threatening atmosphere;
Non-publication of names of judges, counsel, public prosecutor,
witnesses and persons concerned with court proceedings;
21. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
21
21
Protection of Judges, Counsels, Prosecutors & Persons
concerned with Court Proceedings (Sec. 6)
During any inquiry, investigation or court proceedings, in matter of
the identification of the accused , adequate protection to a witness
to protect the identity of the witness from the accused.
PPO,CCPO,CPO or DPO to take appropriate measures for the
protection of the judges, accused, witnesses, prosecutor, defence
counsel and anyone concerned with the court proceedings during
investigation of an offence and the judicial proceedings.
22. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
22
22
Termination of Witness Protection Assistance (Sec.7).
Protection and assistance provided under the Witness Protection
Programme may be terminated by PPO,CPO,DPO if the participant
requests in writing that it be terminated; and
May be terminated in writing by PPO,CPO or DPO, if:
• witness deliberately breaches a requirement or undertaking
relating to the Witness Protection Programme;
23. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
23
23
Termination of Witness Protection Assistance (Sec.7).
• witness’s conduct or threatened conduct, in the opinion of
PPO,CPO,DPO, is likely to threaten the security or compromise
the integrity of the witness protection programme; or
• circumstances, that gave rise to the need for protection for the
witness, have ceased to exist and keeping in view the
circumstances of the case the PPO,CPO or DPO is of the
opinion that,, the protection should be terminated.
24. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
24
24
Restoration of former Identity (Sec.9).
PPO,CPO or DPO, if consider it appropriate to do so, take such
action as is necessary to restore the former identity of a person
whose protection and assistance under WPP has been terminated
in case the participant requests in writing that it be terminated.
25. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
25
25
Certain Persons not to Disclose Information (Sec.10).
Except under the orders of court, a person who acquires information
in the ordinary course of official duties relating to the administration
of the WPP, shall not be required in any proceedings in any court,
tribunal or commission of inquiry, however described, to:
produce any document; or
divulge or communicate any matter or thing, relating to the
performance of his or her duties in connection with WPP.
26. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
26
26
Provision of Information to Competent Authorities (Sec.11).
A person who has been provided with a new identity or relocated
under this Act; and
PPO,CPO or DPO, is notified by a competent authority that the
person is under investigation for, or has been arrested for or is
charged with a serious offence, they may:
release to that authority the new identity or location of the
person;
provide that authority with the criminal record and fingerprints of
the person;
release to that authority such other information as PPO,CPO or
DPO considers appropriate in the circumstances; and
otherwise cooperate with that authority.
27. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
27
27
Offences Relating to Witness Protection (Sec.12).
No person shall, except in accordance with this Act, disclose
information:
o about the identity of a person who is or has been a witness included
in the WPP; or
o that compromises the security of such a person.
Penalty: fine up to five million rupees, or imprisonment for a period not
exceeding 10 years, or both.
28. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
28
28
Offences Relating to Witness Protection (Sec.12).
No person who has participated in the WPP shall, either directly or
indirectly, disclose or communicate to another person:
o Information relating to anything done by the PPO,CPO or DPO or
any police officer under this Act; or
o Information about any police officer gained by the person as a result
of anything done under this Act.
Penalty: fine up to five million rupees, or imprisonment for a period not
exceeding five years, or both.
29. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
29
29
Offences Relating to Witness Protection (Sec.12).
This does not apply to any disclosure or communication:
o that has been authorised by the PPO,CPO or DPO.
o that is necessary to comply with an order of the competent court.
A person in respect of whom an entry is made under this Act in a
register of births, register of deaths or register of marriages shall not,
while the entry remains in force, use or obtain any document that is
based on the previous entry.
Penalty: fine up to one million rupees, or imprisonment for a period not
exceeding five years, or both.
30. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
30
30
Offences Relating to Witness Protection (Sec.12).
A witness who has been provided with a new identity under a witness
protection programme shall not marry using the new identity unless;
o the witness is of marriageable age;
o if the witness has been married previously to another person, the
witness is now divorced from that other person, or that other person
has died; and
o there is no legal impediment to the marriage.
Penalty: fine up to five million rupees, or imprisonment for a period not
exceeding seven years, or both.
31. Punjab Witnesses Protection Act 2011 - DRAFT
31
31
Rules Making by PPO (Sec.14).
PPO, with the approval of the Provincial Government, may by
notification in the official gazette, make rules for carrying into effect the
provisions of this Act.
For direction and control, PPO may issue standing orders not
inconsistent with the Act or rules made hereunder for the efficient
functioning of the Witness Protection Programme.
32. WAY FORWARD
32
32
Enactment and promulgation of Punjab Witness Protection Act
2011, after getting input from all the stakeholders.
Appointment of a focal person to establish Witness Protection
Section (WPS) in Punjab Police.
Preparation of PC-1 to establish the WPS.
Provision of necessary budgetary support.
Hiring of requisite staff for WPS.
Provision of necessary logistic support to the WPS.
33. WAY FORWARD
33
33
Training of all the stakeholders in the Criminal Justice
System about the Witness Protection Programme.
Inauguration of the Witness Protection Programme.
Monitoring of the implementation of Witness Protection
Programme by a high level committee, headed by PPO,
with representation from all the stakeholders in CJS.
Quarterly review of the progress made in the
implementation of WPP and submission of report to the CM.