This document discusses potential commercial uses and arrangements for new generic top-level domains (gTLDs) such as .brand, .authorized, and .quality. It outlines how major brands could use a gTLD to organize online activities and protect against cybersquatting. It also examines how trade associations or collaborations could use a gTLD to endorse members or projects. The document notes legal and operational issues to consider, such as registry agreements, domain licensing, supplier relationships, and partner agreements.
4. Commercial exploitation: .brand
• The basic idea – major brands establishing an umbrella
domain for all their activities
• Allows individual products (ipad.apple) or campaigns
(specialoffer.tesco) to be easily marketed and found
• No issue with cybersquatters or first-come-first-served rules
when launching a sub-brand
• Simpler, quicker and easier online consumer journey
5. Commercial exploitation: .authorised
• Major brands with reseller, developer, etc ecosystem
• Example: Microsoft, Apple, Calor
• Gives immediate authentication of authorisation
• Possible branding advantages:
“Always look for the .brand name”
• Need to extend authorised dealers’ terms, with clear rules
on “ownership” of domain and brand guidelines.
6. Commercial exploitation: .community
• Creating an identity from smaller concerns
• Example: Stockholm, Musicteacher, Kitsch
• May create a brand
• Possibly too pricey except for public sector led initiatives,
eg. to promote smaller enterprises or regions
• Would not require much in the way of rules, but fairness of
access may become an issue
7. Commercial exploitation: .quality
• Trade associations giving a strong endorsement
• Example: master builders, ABTA members,… FSA?
• Cannot fake credentials
• Potentially powerful for regulators or associations to
guarantee member quality and enhance their function
• Extend of rules to govern access
8. Commercial exploitation: .collaboration
• Academic, government, open source or social collaboration
• Example: open source, CSR, Big Society
• Identifying sites common to a social project, with or without
rules
• Funding will be an issue and may be difficult to manage a
highly diverse range of approaches
9. Commercial exploitation: .franchise
• Major brands seeking a high degree of control but relying
on local franchisee entrepreneurship
• Example: Coffee chains, hotel chains or car rental
• High degree of technical control for brand owner
• High degree of consumer confidence, enhancing the value
of a franchise
• For many franchisors, cost may be too high; and central
systems may give desired level of control
12. Domain licensing
• Licensing arrangements
• Potential liability:
• A gTLD owner will be a registry and may be liable for activities
of the third party websites on its domain. Issues include:
• Management and allocation of risk
• Notice and takedown
• Whether to monitor
• Type of monitoring (eg general or specific, in-house or third party
provider)
13. Supplier / customer arrangements
Agreements:
• Hosting / other supplier arrangements
• Registrar / reseller arrangements
• Standard terms and conditions
14. Commercial partnering
Agreements:
• End user terms and conditions
• Franchising agreements
• Affiliate programmes
• Association rules
Potential issues:
• Use of branding
• Website get-up
• Differentiation between partners
• Market focus
• Geography
• Language
• Consequences of termination