SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
An Investigation into Fundamental Movement Skill
Proficiency among Irish Primary School Children
Lisa Kelly1
, Siobhán O’Connor1
, Andrew Harrison2
, Niamh Ní Chéilleachair1
Department of Life and Physical Science, BRI, Athlone Institute of Technology1
Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick2
OVERVIEW
Fundamental movement skills (FMS) are described as foundational movement
patterns which provide a basis for more complex movement sequences required
for daily living, sports specific movements and recreational activities. They are
comprised of locomotor, object control and stability skills. The ideal window of
opportunity for the development of FMS is between 3 and 8 years and failure to
utilise this developmental period may make it more difficult to achieve mastery
later in life (Gallahue & Cleland-Donnelly 2007). The aim of this study is to
establish FMS proficiency across 16 skills among a sample of 300 primary school
children from senior infants to 5th
class. This information will guide the
development of a 12 week intervention programme with primary focus on the
skills and skill components that are most problematic.
IRISH CONTEXT
• Only 19% of Irish primary pupils are reaching the recommended levels of daily
physical activity (Woods et al. 2010).
• Only 11% of 1st
year post-primary pupils achieved FMS mastery in a battery
test of 9 FMS (O Brien et al. 2015).
• The Irish PE curriculum varies hugely with 55% focusing primarily on the
games strand.
• Out of 30 European countries, Irish primary schools provide the lowest number
of hours of PE per school year.
• To date, there is no published research that identifies FMS proficiency among
Irish primary school children.
METHODS
Figure 1. Overview of methodology from participant recruitment to testing in schools
Figure 1. provides a breakdown of the methods
employed to recruit participants, obtain informed
consent and carry out the testing procedure. Once
informed consent is provided, FMS proficiency will be
assessed across 16 movement skills in the relevant
school hall which will be set up as illustrated in Figure
2. Each participant will be video-recorded performing
skills at testing stations 1 and 2.
Figure 2: Set up for testing procedure at school hall
A. Pre-test procedure: ID numbers will be
assigned to participants and
anthropometric data will be measured and
recorded on individual participant
information sheets.
B. Warm up: Participants will be guided
through a 5-10 minute full body dynamic
warm up (Faigenbaum and McFarland
2007).
C. Testing station 1: Locomotor skills and
static balance (run, gallop, hop, leap,
horizontal jump, slide, vertical jump, skip
and single leg stance).
D. Testing station 2: Object control skills
(strike, stationary dribble, catch, kick,
overhand throw, underhand roll).
E. Testing station 3: Y balance test.
F. Cool down: Participants will be guided
through a 5-10 minute cool down of light
jogging and static stretching of major
muscle groups.
ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
15 FMS will be scored by the principal investigator at a
later date using performance criteria from one of the
following three assessment tools:
1.Test of Gross Motor Development 2nd
Edition
2.Get Skilled; Get Active
3.Victorian Fundamental Motor Skills Manual
Y balance (Figure 3) will be scored on the day of
testing as it will not be video recorded.
Data will be analysed using SPSS software version 22.0
for windows using appropriate statistical analysis.
This will include the following:
•Overall proficiency levels established in percentages
•Proficiency levels of skill components
•Difference in overall proficiency between classes
•Difference in overall proficiency between genders
•Identify if there is a relationship between Y balance test
scores and overall FMS scores.
PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION
REFERENCES
FURTHER INFORMATION
• Woods, C.B., Tannehill D., Quinlan, A., Moyna, N. and Walsh, J. 2010.
The Children’s Sport Participation and Physical Activity Study
(CSPPA). Research Report No 1. School of Health and Human
Performance, Dublin City University and The Irish Sports Council,
Dublin Ireland
• Gallahue, D.L. & Cleland-Donnelly, F., 2007. Developmental Physical
Education for All Children, Human Kinetics.
• European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice, 2013. Physical Education
and Sport at School in Europe, Eurydice Report. Luxembourg:
Publications Office of the European Union.
• O’ Brien, W., Belton, S. & Issartel, J. 2015. Fundamental movement
skill proficiency amongst adolescent youth. Physical Education and
Sport Pedagogy, pp.1–15.
• Faigenbaum , A. and McFarland, J. 2007. Guidelines for implementing
a dynamic warm-up for physical education. JOPERD, 78(3), pp. 25-28.
For further information on this study please
contact any of the following:
Lisa Kelly: l.kelly@research.ait.ie
Siobhán O’Connor: soconnor@ait.ie
Niamh Ní Chéilleachair: nnicheilleachair@ait.ie
Figure 3: Y Balance test
This study is funded by the President Seed Fund
Athlone Institute of Technology

More Related Content

Similar to Waterford conference poster

The Effects of a 2-Year PhysicalEducation Program (SPARK)o.docx
The Effects of a 2-Year PhysicalEducation Program (SPARK)o.docxThe Effects of a 2-Year PhysicalEducation Program (SPARK)o.docx
The Effects of a 2-Year PhysicalEducation Program (SPARK)o.docx
todd701
 
Conference presentation
Conference presentationConference presentation
Conference presentation
Noel Sritharan
 
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school childrenA therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
Alexander Decker
 
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school childrenA therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
Alexander Decker
 
The efficacy of using HW in PEKory Hill.docx
The efficacy of using HW in PEKory Hill.docxThe efficacy of using HW in PEKory Hill.docx
The efficacy of using HW in PEKory Hill.docx
mehek4
 
Running  head  RESEARCH  PROPOSAL   1  .docx
Running  head  RESEARCH  PROPOSAL   1  .docxRunning  head  RESEARCH  PROPOSAL   1  .docx
Running  head  RESEARCH  PROPOSAL   1  .docx
agnesdcarey33086
 
SENIORCOMMPAPERFORPRACTICEChadarticleHWBacilioMonterroso
SENIORCOMMPAPERFORPRACTICEChadarticleHWBacilioMonterrosoSENIORCOMMPAPERFORPRACTICEChadarticleHWBacilioMonterroso
SENIORCOMMPAPERFORPRACTICEChadarticleHWBacilioMonterroso
Mefi Monterroso
 

Similar to Waterford conference poster (20)

Poster Slide
Poster SlidePoster Slide
Poster Slide
 
Effect of socio economic status on the effective students participation in ph...
Effect of socio economic status on the effective students participation in ph...Effect of socio economic status on the effective students participation in ph...
Effect of socio economic status on the effective students participation in ph...
 
The Effects of a 2-Year PhysicalEducation Program (SPARK)o.docx
The Effects of a 2-Year PhysicalEducation Program (SPARK)o.docxThe Effects of a 2-Year PhysicalEducation Program (SPARK)o.docx
The Effects of a 2-Year PhysicalEducation Program (SPARK)o.docx
 
Physical literacy presenation USC Sport conference
Physical literacy presenation   USC Sport conferencePhysical literacy presenation   USC Sport conference
Physical literacy presenation USC Sport conference
 
METTLE (Placement Students).pptx
METTLE (Placement Students).pptxMETTLE (Placement Students).pptx
METTLE (Placement Students).pptx
 
Ci350powerpoint
Ci350powerpointCi350powerpoint
Ci350powerpoint
 
Ci350powerpoint
Ci350powerpointCi350powerpoint
Ci350powerpoint
 
Conference presentation
Conference presentationConference presentation
Conference presentation
 
An Assessment of the Level of Competence Acquired By Graduates of the Undergr...
An Assessment of the Level of Competence Acquired By Graduates of the Undergr...An Assessment of the Level of Competence Acquired By Graduates of the Undergr...
An Assessment of the Level of Competence Acquired By Graduates of the Undergr...
 
Challengesandopportunitiesinphysicalactivityofteachingandnonteachingpersonnel
ChallengesandopportunitiesinphysicalactivityofteachingandnonteachingpersonnelChallengesandopportunitiesinphysicalactivityofteachingandnonteachingpersonnel
Challengesandopportunitiesinphysicalactivityofteachingandnonteachingpersonnel
 
PEPAYS Presentation
PEPAYS PresentationPEPAYS Presentation
PEPAYS Presentation
 
ConcussionEvaluationSummaryReport2014
ConcussionEvaluationSummaryReport2014ConcussionEvaluationSummaryReport2014
ConcussionEvaluationSummaryReport2014
 
Effects of Learning by Video Modeling on Gymnastic Performances among Tunisia...
Effects of Learning by Video Modeling on Gymnastic Performances among Tunisia...Effects of Learning by Video Modeling on Gymnastic Performances among Tunisia...
Effects of Learning by Video Modeling on Gymnastic Performances among Tunisia...
 
physical 1
physical 1physical 1
physical 1
 
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school childrenA therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
 
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school childrenA therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
 
Sports coaching pedagogy assessment 1
Sports coaching pedagogy assessment 1Sports coaching pedagogy assessment 1
Sports coaching pedagogy assessment 1
 
The efficacy of using HW in PEKory Hill.docx
The efficacy of using HW in PEKory Hill.docxThe efficacy of using HW in PEKory Hill.docx
The efficacy of using HW in PEKory Hill.docx
 
Running  head  RESEARCH  PROPOSAL   1  .docx
Running  head  RESEARCH  PROPOSAL   1  .docxRunning  head  RESEARCH  PROPOSAL   1  .docx
Running  head  RESEARCH  PROPOSAL   1  .docx
 
SENIORCOMMPAPERFORPRACTICEChadarticleHWBacilioMonterroso
SENIORCOMMPAPERFORPRACTICEChadarticleHWBacilioMonterrosoSENIORCOMMPAPERFORPRACTICEChadarticleHWBacilioMonterroso
SENIORCOMMPAPERFORPRACTICEChadarticleHWBacilioMonterroso
 

Waterford conference poster

  • 1. An Investigation into Fundamental Movement Skill Proficiency among Irish Primary School Children Lisa Kelly1 , Siobhán O’Connor1 , Andrew Harrison2 , Niamh Ní Chéilleachair1 Department of Life and Physical Science, BRI, Athlone Institute of Technology1 Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick2 OVERVIEW Fundamental movement skills (FMS) are described as foundational movement patterns which provide a basis for more complex movement sequences required for daily living, sports specific movements and recreational activities. They are comprised of locomotor, object control and stability skills. The ideal window of opportunity for the development of FMS is between 3 and 8 years and failure to utilise this developmental period may make it more difficult to achieve mastery later in life (Gallahue & Cleland-Donnelly 2007). The aim of this study is to establish FMS proficiency across 16 skills among a sample of 300 primary school children from senior infants to 5th class. This information will guide the development of a 12 week intervention programme with primary focus on the skills and skill components that are most problematic. IRISH CONTEXT • Only 19% of Irish primary pupils are reaching the recommended levels of daily physical activity (Woods et al. 2010). • Only 11% of 1st year post-primary pupils achieved FMS mastery in a battery test of 9 FMS (O Brien et al. 2015). • The Irish PE curriculum varies hugely with 55% focusing primarily on the games strand. • Out of 30 European countries, Irish primary schools provide the lowest number of hours of PE per school year. • To date, there is no published research that identifies FMS proficiency among Irish primary school children. METHODS Figure 1. Overview of methodology from participant recruitment to testing in schools Figure 1. provides a breakdown of the methods employed to recruit participants, obtain informed consent and carry out the testing procedure. Once informed consent is provided, FMS proficiency will be assessed across 16 movement skills in the relevant school hall which will be set up as illustrated in Figure 2. Each participant will be video-recorded performing skills at testing stations 1 and 2. Figure 2: Set up for testing procedure at school hall A. Pre-test procedure: ID numbers will be assigned to participants and anthropometric data will be measured and recorded on individual participant information sheets. B. Warm up: Participants will be guided through a 5-10 minute full body dynamic warm up (Faigenbaum and McFarland 2007). C. Testing station 1: Locomotor skills and static balance (run, gallop, hop, leap, horizontal jump, slide, vertical jump, skip and single leg stance). D. Testing station 2: Object control skills (strike, stationary dribble, catch, kick, overhand throw, underhand roll). E. Testing station 3: Y balance test. F. Cool down: Participants will be guided through a 5-10 minute cool down of light jogging and static stretching of major muscle groups. ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 15 FMS will be scored by the principal investigator at a later date using performance criteria from one of the following three assessment tools: 1.Test of Gross Motor Development 2nd Edition 2.Get Skilled; Get Active 3.Victorian Fundamental Motor Skills Manual Y balance (Figure 3) will be scored on the day of testing as it will not be video recorded. Data will be analysed using SPSS software version 22.0 for windows using appropriate statistical analysis. This will include the following: •Overall proficiency levels established in percentages •Proficiency levels of skill components •Difference in overall proficiency between classes •Difference in overall proficiency between genders •Identify if there is a relationship between Y balance test scores and overall FMS scores. PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION REFERENCES FURTHER INFORMATION • Woods, C.B., Tannehill D., Quinlan, A., Moyna, N. and Walsh, J. 2010. The Children’s Sport Participation and Physical Activity Study (CSPPA). Research Report No 1. School of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University and The Irish Sports Council, Dublin Ireland • Gallahue, D.L. & Cleland-Donnelly, F., 2007. Developmental Physical Education for All Children, Human Kinetics. • European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice, 2013. Physical Education and Sport at School in Europe, Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. • O’ Brien, W., Belton, S. & Issartel, J. 2015. Fundamental movement skill proficiency amongst adolescent youth. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, pp.1–15. • Faigenbaum , A. and McFarland, J. 2007. Guidelines for implementing a dynamic warm-up for physical education. JOPERD, 78(3), pp. 25-28. For further information on this study please contact any of the following: Lisa Kelly: l.kelly@research.ait.ie Siobhán O’Connor: soconnor@ait.ie Niamh Ní Chéilleachair: nnicheilleachair@ait.ie Figure 3: Y Balance test This study is funded by the President Seed Fund Athlone Institute of Technology