This study compared two metabolic carts, the Vmax and Innocor, during rest and exercise. The study found no significant differences between the carts at lower workloads but a deviation at higher workloads of 200 Watts or more, likely due to differences in gas analysis techniques. Both carts can measure metabolic measurements like VO2 and VCO2 but the Vmax has limitations of cost, mobility, and skill required compared to the Innocor.
2. Methods
• The volume of oxygen consumed and utilized by working muscle per
minute during rest or exercise.
• Defined by Fick:
• VO2 = Q × a-vO2 difference
• Q = SV × HR
• Q= Cardiac output; SV= Stroke volume; HR= Heart rate
• Calculated as:
• VO2 = [VE × (FEN2 / FIN2) × FIO2] – [VE × FEO2]
• VE= Ventilation, volume/min; FEN2= Fraction of expired nitrogen; FIN2= Fraction of inspired
nitrogen; FIO2= Fraction of inspired oxygen; FEO2= Fraction of expired oxygen
• To measure Q
• Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)
• To measure a-vO2 Diff
• Arterial venous catheter
• blood sampling
3. How they work
Innocor
• Flowmeter
• Gas Analyzer
• Oxygen sensor
Vmax
• Flow/Volume
• O2 Analyzer
• CO2 Analyzer
• Flash Multi-Gas
Innocor Vmax
4. Purpose
The aim of this study is to compare the metabolic
measurements between Vmax and Innocor simultaneously
during rest and exercise.
Hypothesis
It is hypothesized that there will be no difference between Vmax
and Innocor during rest and exercise.
5. Design and Protocol
• Simultaneous measurements
• Baseline
• 50 W
• 100 W
• 150 W
• 200 W
• 250 W
• 300 W
• Staged steady state
exercise - 2 minutes
9. Discussion
• No significant change in results for low workloads
• After 200W there becomes a deviation in the results
• No significant difference in the respiration, at any
workload
• VO2 and VCO2 at high workloads (300W)
• Account for gas analysis
• FIO2 and FEO2
10. Features
Features
Safe Yes Yes
Start up cost 160,000 60,000
Mobility Minimal Maximal
Skill required Maximal Minimal
Range Rest- Maximal? Rest-Maximal?
Issues
Technician
Mouthpiece discomfort
Vmax Innocor
11. Conclusion
Both Vmax and Innocor can attain similar
results for lower workloads, but begin to drift
during higher workloads.
12. Acknowledgments
• Brad Byers
• Desi Fuhr
• Karishma Kapoor
• Linn Moore
• Melissa Bouwsema
• Michael Stickland
• Vince Tedjasaputra
13. References
• Allen et al. (2013). ACSM’s Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription.
Baltimore, MD. Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams &Wilkins
• Beekley et al. (2004). Cross-Validation of the YMCA Submaximal Cycle
Ergometer Test to Predict VO2max. Research Quarterly for Exercise
and Sport. 75:3, 337-342.
• CareFusion Corporation. (2014). Vmax Encore Metabolic Cart. Retrieved
from www.carefusion.com
• Innovision ApS. (2014). Innocor. Retrieved from www.innovision.dk
• Stringer, W. Hansen, J. Wasserman, K. (1997). Cardiac output estimated
noninvasively from oxygen uptake during exercise. J Appl Physiol
82:908-912.
• Welch, HG. Pedersen, PK. (1981). Measurement of metabolic rate in
hyperoxia. J Appll Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. Sep; 51(3):
725-31.
Both Innocor and Vmax has many features for measuring. Such as: Cardiac output or spirometry. However, the main focus was on the breath by breath method
Innocor –GAS, Photo acoustic spectroscopy; Oxygen, Laser absorption spectroscopy; Flow, Differential pressure
Vmax- Flow, Mass flow sensor; Oxygen, Electro chemical cell; CO2 & Flash multi-gas, non-disersice infrared, thermopile
If the individuals was not at steady state, we would hold the stage for an additional minute
T-test was used to compare innocor and vmax at each workload
Steady State- VO2 (L/min) 0.150ml
-VCO2 (L/min) 0.150ml
-VO2 (ml/kg/min) 2-3 ml/kg/min
An article from Beekley. He preformed a cross-validation of the YMCA to predict VO2. The mean difference between the CE VO2max and the YMCA test was 6.83 ml/kg/min.
10.8 = O2 cost of cycling against external load (resistance)
7 = O2 cost of cycling with zero load