SlideShare a Scribd company logo
THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
RESEARCH SUPPORTED BYIN COLLABORATION WITH READ MORE AT BIT.LY/ALLABOUTMEMBERS
VISUALS FROM THE FINAL 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY RESULTS
SELECTED SLIDES WITH CHARTS
ULTIMATE MEMBER DATA:
UTILIZATION OF
COWORKING SPACES
2
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
MONTH OF JOINING A COWORKING SPACE FOR THE FIRST TIME
0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
2%
8%
9%
13%
9%
9%
7%7%
9%
8%
7%
14%
3%
9%
11%
12%
9%
5%
8%
7%
9%
6%
7%
15%
4%
7%
11%
12%
9%
8%
8%
6%6%
11%
6%
13%
2017 2016 2014
1ST
PEAK
2ND
PEAK
GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS
THIS CHART REPRESENTS THE GLOBAL AVERAGE AND THE RESPONSES ARE DOMINATED BY COWORKING SPACES IN
THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE WHERE MOST OF COWORKING SPACES ARE LOCATED. FOR THE SAME REASON, THE
RESULTS ARE ALSO STRONGLY INFLUENCED BY THE CHRISTIAN CULTURE. THE RESULTS CAN STRONGLY DIFFER IN
REGIONS WITH A DIFFERENT CULTURE AND GEOGRAPHIC AREA. IN THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE, DECEMBER MARKS A
LOW AS WELL. PEAKS ARE AUGUST- OCTOBER & MARCH. INDEPENDENT OF THE CULTURES AND GEOGRAPHICAL
LOCATION, NEW MEMBERS USUALLY SIGN UP IN THE WEEKS FOLLOWING POPULAR HOLIDAYS IN THEIR REGIONS.
3
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS
1000 % 2000 % 3000 % 4000 %
REASONS WHY COWORKING SPACES ARE CHOSEN
A SOCIAL & ENJOYABLE ATMOSPHERE
INTERACTION WITH OTHERS
A COMMUNITY
A CLOSE DISTANCE TO MY HOME
LIKE-MINDED PEOPLE
GOOD VALUE FOR MONEY
GOOD TRANSPORT CONNECTIONS NEARBY
BASIC OFFICE INFRASTRUCTURE
KNOWLEDGE SHARING
A BIG OPEN WORKSPACE
FLEXIBLE WORKTIMES
MEETING SPACES
EVENTS
RANDOM DISCOVERIES
A CLEAN WORKSPACE
INTERDISCIPLINARY WORK
GOOD INTERNET CONNECTIONS
FRIENDS WHO ALREADY WORKED HERE
MY COMPANY OR CLIENT PAYS FOR IT
WORKSHOPS
SUPERMARKETS OR RESTAURANTS NEARBY
PRIVATE OFFICES
SPECIAL INFRASTRUCTURE (E.G. 3D-PRINTER) 1875 % 3750 % 5625 % 7500 %
7%
15%
17%
13%
27%
44%
24%
41%
48%
37%
45%
36%
32%
37%
57%
41%
39%
58%
44%
72%
74%
66%
3%
8%
14%
15%
15%
15%
25%
25%
27%
27%
31%
31%
34%
34%
35%
38%
41%
41%
47%
51%
55%
56%
59%
2017 2016
4
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
GENERIC WORKSPACE BEFORE BECOMING A MEMBER
2017*
2016
2014
2012
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
3%
5%
4%
3%
1%
1%
3%
1%
6%
6%
4%
3%
1%
2%
1%
3%
4%
6%
4%
6%
5%
1%
3%
3%
22%
23%
37%
26%
58%
56%
45%
45%10%
ANOTHER COWORKING SPACE* AT HOME TRADITIONAL OFFICE
SMALL SHARED OFFICE COFFEE SHOP BUSINESS CENTER
NO FIXED LOCATION LIBRARY OTHER & N.A.
*PLEASE NOTE: THIS QUESTION WAS CHANGED FOR THE 2017 SURVEY FROM "WHERE DID YOU MOSTLY WORK BEFORE YOU STARTED USING A
COWORKING SPACE?" TO "WHERE DID YOU MOSTLY WORK BEFORE YOU STARTED USING YOUR CURRENT COWORKING SPACE?". FOR THIS REASON A NEW
ANSWER CHOICE, ‘ANOTHER COWORKING SPACE’, HAS BEEN INTRODUCED TO PORTRAY THE CHANGE IN QUESTION AND ALLOW EXISTING COWORKING
MEMBERS TO EXPRESS THAT THEY MOVED FROM ONE COWORKING SPACE TO ANOTHER.
GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS
5
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
2017*
2016
2014
2012
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
3%
5%
4%
4%
1%
1%
3%
1%
6%
6%
4%
4%
1%
2%
1%
3%
4%
6%
4%
6%
5%
1%
3%
4%
22%
23%
37%
29%
58%
56%
45%
49%
ANOTHER COWORKING SPACE* AT HOME TRADITIONAL OFFICE
SMALL SHARED OFFICE COFFEE SHOP BUSINESS CENTER
NO FIXED LOCATION LIBRARY OTHER & N.A.
GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS WITHOUT COWORKING SPACES
*PLEASE NOTE: THIS QUESTION WAS CHANGED FOR THE 2017 SURVEY FROM "WHERE DID YOU MOSTLY WORK BEFORE YOU STARTED USING A
COWORKING SPACE?" TO "WHERE DID YOU MOSTLY WORK BEFORE YOU STARTED USING YOUR CURRENT COWORKING SPACE?". FOR THIS REASON A NEW
ANSWER CHOICE, ‘ANOTHER COWORKING SPACE’, WAS INTRODUCED ON THE PREVIOUS SLIDE TO ALLOW EXISTING COWORKING MEMBERS TO EXPRESS
THAT THEY MOVED FROM ONE COWORKING SPACE TO ANOTHER. THIS CHART PRESENTS THE (NON-COMPARABLE) RESULTS WITHOUT THE NEW CHOICE.
GENERIC WORKSPACE BEFORE BECOMING A MEMBER
WORD OF MOUTH
INTERNET SEARCH
(MY) COMPANY OR CLIENT
MEDIA (INCL. SOCIAL MEDIA)
PASSED BY
LISTING DIRECTORY
ADVERTISING
OTHER & N.A.
1000 % 2000 % 3000 % 4000 %
11%
1%
4%
5%
11%
12%
23%
33%
SOURCE OF LEADS BEFORE BECOMING A MEMBER
6
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
GENERAL 2017 RESULT
RESPONSES FOR THIS DATA CANNOT BE COMPARED TO PREVIOUS YEARS DUE TO MINOR DIFFERENCES IN THE QUESTION PRESENTED. IN PREVIOUS
YEARS, WE HAD ASKED MEMBERS: "HOW DID YOU FIRST HEAR ABOUT YOUR COWORKING SPACE" AND IN 2017 WE ASKED MEMBERS: "HOW DID
YOU FIND YOUR CURRENT COWORKING SPACE BEFORE YOU BECAME A MEMBER?" PRIOR TO 2017, MEMBERS WERE ALSO ALLOWED TO PROVIDE
MULTIPLE ANSWERS TO THE QUESTION, WHEREAS IN 2017 MEMBERS WERE ASKED TO PROVIDE JUST ONE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION. DESPITE THESE
CHANGES, 'WORD OF MOUTH' REMAINED THE MOST POPULAR RESPONSE TO BOTH QUESTIONS. 
7
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
MEMBER COMMUTING TIMES & TRANSPORT TYPES OF MEMBERS
*'SCOOTERS’ AND ‘MOTOR BIKES’ WERE NOT OPTIONAL ANSWERS BEFORE 2017 & IN **2012: "OTHER" WAS NOT AN OPTION YET.
PLEASE NOTE: DIFFERENCES MAY OCCUR DUE TO THE TIME AT WHICH THE SURVEY WAS TAKEN: THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED IN NOVEMBER AND
DECEMBER 2016, WHILST THE 2016 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED IN OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER 2015. GENERALLY, TRANSPORT TYPES CAN STRONGLY DEPEND ON
CHANGING WEATHER CONDITIONS THAT ALSO INFLUENCE COMMUTING TIMES.
2017*
2016
2014
2012** 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
1%
6%
2%
4%
34%
39%
28%
35%
34%
26%
24%
27%3%
17%
14%
25%
14%
14%
16%
21%
18%
ON FOOT BY BIKE BY SCOOTER
BY PUBLIC TRANSPORT BY CAR N.A. & OTHER
MEAN MEDIAN
22.4 20
22.9 20
21.4 15
5% TRIMMED
MEAN
22.4 2021
19.5
21.2
20.6
GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS
2017
2016
2014
2012
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
2%
2%
4%
2%
5%
9%
7%
8%
8%
6%
6%
11%
22%
23%
15%
19%
14%
17%
14%
16%
25%
19%
17%
17%
17%
18%
22%
16%
7%
7%
14%
11%
0 - 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 60 > 60 MINUTES
8
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
MEMBER WORK HOURS & FREQUENCY OF COWORKING SPACE USAGE
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1AM
2AM
3AM
4AM
5AM
6AM
7AM
8AM
9AM
10AM
11AM
NOON
1PM
2PM
3PM
4PM
5PM
6PM
7PM
8PM
9PM
10PM
11PM
12AM
START
END
5% TRIMMED MEAN: 8:55 AM
MEAN: 9:04 AM
MEDIAN: 9:00 AM
5% TRIMMED MEAN: 5:46 PM
MEAN: 5:20 PM
MEDIAN: 6:00 PM
9H
3MIN*
AVERAGE LENGTH OF
A WORKING DAY
(INCLUDING BREAKS)*
MEAN: 8H 58MIN - MEDIAN: 9H
5% TRIMMED
MEAN
22%
WORK AT
IRREGULAR
TIMES
& COULDN'T RESPOND
TO THIS QUESTION
2017
2016
2014
2012
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
3%
1%
2%
3%
2%
4%
14%
16%
11%
9%
26%
28%
15%
17%
28%
24%
29%
31%
32%
26%
43%
38%
5 TIMES A WEEK OR MORE OFTEN* 3 OR 4 TIMES A WEEK
1 OR 2 TIMES A WEEK 1 TO 4 TIMES A MONTH
LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH N.A. & OTHER
*DAILY(IN2012)
MEMBER WORK HOURS - GENERAL RESULTS
WORKING DAY
FREQUENCY OF COWORKING SPACE USAGE BY YEAR
PLEASE NOTE: THIS CHART SHOWS WHEN MEMBERS USUALLY START & END THEIR WORKING DAYS. IT
DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN THEY SPEND EVERY HOUR WITHIN THE COWORKING SPACE.
THE NEXT TOPIC PRESENTS DATA OF MEMBERS WHO ALSO WORK OUTSIDE THEIR COWORKING SPACES.
*AVERAGES ARE CALCULATED BASED ON THE START AND END TIME OF EACH INDIVIDUAL MEMBER.
9
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
MEMBERS WHO WORK OUTSIDE THEIR COWORKING SPACES
2017
2016
2014
2012
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
1%
5%
2%
3%
9%
9%
12%
15%
90%
86%
87%
82%
YES NO DON'T KNOW & N.A.
MOST POPULAR ALTERNATIVE
WORKSPACES USED BY MEMBERS*
AT HOME
COFFEE SHOP
LIBRARY
BUSINESS CENTER
OTHER
2125 % 4250 % 6375 % 8500 %
4%
1%
1%
15%
16%
80%
5%
1%
4%
17%
13%
82%
6%
1%
6%
18%
16%
69%
4%
3%
4%
16%
16%
67%
2017 2016
2014 2012
NO. 1 'OTHER' RESPONSE: CLIENT'S
OFFICE, FOLLOWED BY: TRAIN,
UNIVERSITY, FRIEND'S PLACE &
ANOTHER COWORKING SPACE
SMALL SHARED
OFFICE COMMUNITY
TRADITIONAL
OFFICE
&
*PRESENTS THE % OF MEMBERS WHO WORK OFTEN OUTSIDE THEIR COWORKING SPACE
GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS
10
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
MULTIPLE MEMBERSHIPS & USE OF COWORKING VISA PROGRAMS
2017
2016
2014
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
2%
1%
1%
92%
92%
92%
7%
7%
7%
YES NO DON'T KNOW OR N.A.
HAVE YOU EVER USED A MEMBERSHIP OR VISA PROGRAM TO WORK FROM OTHER COWORKING SPACES?
2017
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
1%89%10% 2017
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
2%70%28%
2017
2016
2014
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
6%
3%
2%
71%
74%
79%
23%
22%
19%
DO YOU CURRENTLY HAVE A MEMBERSHIP FOR MORE THAN ONE COWORKING SPACE?
GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS
ALL MEMBERS
(CALCULATED RESULT)
MEMBERS WHO PREVIOUSLY WORKED FROM
MORE THAN ONE COWORKING SPACE
PLEASE NOTE: OPTIONAL ANSWERS OF THIS QUESTION WERE SIMPLIFIED FOR THE 2017 SURVEY - HENCE COMPARABLE DATA FOR PREVIOUS YEARS IS NOT
AVAILABLE. HOWEVER, WE CAN CONFIRM THAT THE AMOUNT OF RESPONDENTS WHO ANSWERED “YES” TO THIS QUESTION SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED.
11
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
2%
1%12%59%26%
HIP & TRENDY CASUAL BUSINESS CASUAL SUIT & TIE N.A. & OTHER
GENERAL 2017 RESULT
BY GENDER OF MEMBERS
BY MEMBER AGE GROUPS
FEMALE
MALE
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
1%
2%
1%
1%
12%
10%
60%
62%
27%
25%
18 - 34 YEARS OLD
35-49 YEARS OLD
50 + YEARS OLD
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
3%
2%
1%
3%
1%
13%
8%
13%
53%
71%
55%
29%
20%
30%
MEMBER WORK ENVIRONMENT
12
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
MEMBER WORK ARRANGEMENT & PREFERRED ARRANGEMENT
GENERAL RESULTS BY YEAR STATUS QUO PREFERENCE
2017
2016
2014
2012
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
1%
2%
1%
2%
23%
19%
21%
24%
11%
11%
13%
15%
13%
8%
9%
7%
53%
60%
56%
51%
ON THEIR OWN IN SPONTANEOUS & FREQUENTLY CHANGING TEAMS
IN REGULAR BUT CHANGING TEAMS IN A PERMANENTLY FIXED TEAM
N.A.
2017
2016
2014
2012
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
1%19%31%12%37%
QUESTION WAS NOT PART OF THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY BEFORE 2017
13
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
CURRENT DESK TYPES OF MEMBERS & PREFERRED DESK TYPES
2017*
2016
2014
2012
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
2%
66%
63%
47%
54%
11%
12%
11%
24%
25%
42%
44%
DEDICATED DESK MAINLY AT A DEDICATED DESK*
FLEXIBILE DESK N.A.
GENERAL RESULTS BY YEAR
2017
2016
2014
2012
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
1%
2%
52%
53%
35%
38%
22%26%
47%
64%
61%
*PLEASE NOTE: OPTIONAL ANSWERS WERE SIMPLIFIED FOR THE 2017 SURVEY. "MAINLY AT A DEDICATED DESK" WAS REMOVED AS A POSSIBLE ANSWER FROM THE
‘STATUS QUO’ QUESTION.
STATUS QUO PREFERENCE
14
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
MEMBER WORKSPACE ACCESS TYPE & PREFERRED LEVEL OF ACCESS
GENERAL RESULTS BY YEARS
2017
2016
2014
2012
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
3%
10%
13%
11%
7%
5%
3%
2%
1%
38%
37%
32%
31%
47%
48%
55%
59%
24/7 TRADITIONAL OFFICE HOURS
HALF-DAYS LIMITED DAYS OR HOURS PER MONTH
N.A.
2017
2016
2014
2012
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
2%
3%
12%
7%
4%
5%
4%
6%
31%
35%
35%
51%
53%
52%
STATUS QUO PREFERENCE
PLEASE NOTE: IN 2017 THIS QUESTION ABOUT THE
PREFERENCE WAS NOT PART OF THE GLOBAL
COWORKING SURVEY
15
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
MEMBER WORKSPACE AREAS & PREFERRED WORKSPACE AREAS
2017
2016
2014
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
5%
2%
3%
2%
3%
2%
2%
1%
2%
3%
5%
6%
9%
13%
13%
79%
76%
74%
OPEN WORKSPACE TEAM OFFICE
SINGLE OFFICE COFFEE AREAS
MEETING ROOM OTHER & N.A.
GENERAL RESULTS BY YEARS
PLEASE NOTE: OPEN WORKSPACES OFFER MORE FLEXIBLE (SHARED) DESKS, RESULTING IN A HIGHER SHARE OF MEMBERS WHO CAN USE AN OPEN WORKSPACE
(COMPARED TO TEAM OFFICES & SINGLE OFFICES THAT MAINLY OFFER DESKS DEDICATED TO ONE MEMBER). FURTHERMORE, THIS QUESTION WAS INTRODUCED IN THE 2014
GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY WHEN MORE COWORKING SPACES INTEGRATED PRIVATE OFFICES INTO THEIR WORKSPACES. NO DATA AVAILABLE PRIOR TO 2014.
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
6%
4%
3%
2%
4%15%
11%
15%
20%
58%
63%
STATUS QUO PREFERENCE
PLEASE NOTE: IN 2017 THIS QUESTION ABOUT THE
PREFERENCE WAS NOT PART OF THE GLOBAL
COWORKING SURVEY
16
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
MAXIMUM NO. OF WORKSTATIONS OF THEIR COWORKING SPACES
2017
2016
2014
2012
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
8%
8%
14%
24%
24%
22%
23%
23%
34%
32%
29%
27%
34%
38%
34%
26%
< 25 WORKSTATIONS 25 - 49 WORKSTATIONS
50 - 99 WORKSTATIONS ≥ 100 WORKSTATIONS
GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS MEAN MEDIAN
5% TRIMMED
MEAN
40 30
40 30
72 4057
36
37
55 4045
PLEASE NOTE: THE VALUES IN THE CHART ABOVE REPRESENT THE REPORTS OF MEMBERS OF COWORKING SPACES, NOT OF THE COWORKING SPACES THEMSELVES.
THERE ARE MORE MEMBERS THAN COWORKING SPACES & THEY ARE NOT NECESSARILY EQUALLY DISTRIBUTED SINCE THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS VARIES PER SPACE.
WORKSTATIONS
17
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
GENERAL 2017 RESULT STATUS QUO PREFERENCE
BY GENDER OF MEMBERS
2017
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
3%
3%1%
36%42%14%
A BASIC CHAIR (E.G. WOODEN OR PLASTIC) A SIMPLE OFFICE CHAIR
AN ERGONOMIC OFFICE CHAIR A STABILITY BALL OR BALL CHAIR
A STANDING DESK OTHER & N.A.
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
4%
8%3%70%13%4%
FEMALE
MALE
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
1%
1%
3%
4%
2%
1%
39%
33%
40%
49%
16%
12%
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
3%
1%
6%
10%
3%
3%
67%
74%
19%
7%
2%
5%
BY MEMBER AGE GROUPS
18 - 34
35 - 49
50 +
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
6%
1%
3%
6%
2%
2%
2%
34%
39%
33%
50%
39%
48%
6%
14%
15%
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
4%
3%
1%
11%
12%
5%
1%
6%
68%
70%
70%
14%
11%
15%
4%
2%
5%
YEARSOLD
CURRENT CHAIR TYPES OF MEMBERS & PREFERRED CHAIR TYPES
18
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
VIEW PREFERENCES
2017
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
1%25%70%3%
A WALL
A WINDOW (WITH A VIEW TO THE SURROUNDING AREAS)
PEOPLE AROUND THEM
N.A.
BY GENDER OF MEMBERS
GENERAL 2017 RESULT
18 - 34
35 - 49
50 +
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
30%
29%
23%
65%
64%
78%
4%
8%
0%
BY MEMBER AGE GROUPS
FEMALE
MALE
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
21%
31%
76%
66%
3%
3%
YEARSOLD
19
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
LAYOUT PREFERENCES
2017
2016
2014
2012
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
2%
2%
3%
2%
6%
3%
7%
4%9%
40%
57%
48%
41%
35%
26%
25%
27%
17%
12%
17%
17%
OPEN WORKSPACES WITH TRANSPARENT ROOMS OPEN WORKSPACES WITH PRIVATE AREAS
A MIX OF OPEN & CLOSED ROOMS PRIVATE WORKSPACES WITH OPEN AREAS*
I DON'T MIND OTHER & N.A.
GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS
*PLEASE NOTE: THE OPTIONAL ANSWER "PRIVATE WORKSPACES WITH OPEN AREAS" WAS NOT PART OF THE GLOBAL COWORKING
SURVEY BEFORE 2017
20
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS
1000 % 2000 % 3000 % 4000 %
WHAT MEMBERS LIKE ABOUT THEIR COWORKING SPACES THE MOST
THE LOCATION
THE MEMBERS*
THE MANAGERS/HOSTS**
THE INTERIOUR DESIGN
THE EVENTS
THE INTERNET CONNECTION***
THE PRICE****
OTHER
2000 % 4000 % 6000 % 8000 %
6%
31%
43%
53%
80%
61%
5%
33%
31%
40%
50%
72%
58%
7%
33%
31%
35%
48%
63%
69%
75%
10%
30%
31%
31%
42%
52%
63%
70%
2017 2016 2014 2012
*2014 & BEFORE: "THE PEOPLE IN MY COWORKING SPACE"
** 2014 & BEFORE: "THE COWORKING SPACE OPERATORS"
*** WAS NOT PART OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE BEFORE 2016
**** 2012: WAS NOT ASKED IN A COMPARABLE WAY
OTHER: .E.G.COMMUNITY (=MEMBERS); FLEXIBILITY, NETWORKING, BIG WINDOWS, THE VIEW,
NATURAL LIGHT, FACILITIES, THE OPPORTUNITIES, THE VIBE, THE COFFEE, FREE PARKING
MULTIPLE RESPONSES ALLOWED
21
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
WHAT MEMBERS DON'T LIKE ABOUT THEIR COWORKING SPACES
GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS
NOISE
LACK OF INTERACTION*
LACK OF PRIVACY
BAD INTERNET CONNECTION*
NOT ABLE TO FOCUS
INCOMPLETE INFRASTRUCTURE
CLEANINESS
PRICES ARE TOO HIGH
COWORKING SPACE IN A BAD SHAPE*
PEOPLE IN MY COWORKING SPACE
OTHER**
825 % 1650 % 2475 % 3300 %
23%
5%
10%
5%
13%
10%
17%
21%
15%
4%
4%
5%
7%
9%
17%
30%
15%
14%
24%
15%
4%
5%
8%
11%
12%
15%
19%
19%
20%
25%
*THOSE RESPONSE OPTIONS HAVE NOT BEEN AVAILABLE IN 2014 YET.
**OTHER (2017): .E.G. CLIMATE CONDITIONS, INTERIOR DESIGN, LACK OF KITCHEN FACILITIES, LACK OF (FREE)
PARKING, LACK OF NATURAL LIGHT, LACK OF CELL PHONE RECEPTION, CONSTANT CHANGES.
MULTIPLE RESPONSES ALLOWED
22
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
2017
2016
2014
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
0%
1%
1%
18%
18%
24%
13%
15%
14%
70%
66%
62%
YES YES, BUT ALSO WORKED FROM OTHERS NO DON'T KNOW & N.A.
2017
2016
2014
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
4%
5%
11%
3%
3%
5%
6%
9%
8%
15%
17%
13%
72%
67%
64%
1 2 3 4 5+ COWORKING SPACES
PLEASE NOTE: THE SECOND QUESTION DIDN'T OFFER A "DON'T KNOW" OPTION FOR TECHNICAL REASONS:
HENCE, THE SLIGHT DIFFERENCES TO THE FIRST QUESTION MAY BE EXPLAINED BY RESPONDENTS WHO DIDN'T
RESPOND TO THIS QUESTION. 'N.A.' ALSO COULDN'T BE CONSIDERED FOR THE SAME REASON.
MEAN MEDIAN
5% TRIMMED
MEAN
2.5 11.8
1.8 11.5
1.9 11.4
MEMBER COWORKING HISTORY
GENERAL RESULTS BY YEARS - DO YOU STILL WORK FROM YOUR FIRST COWORKING SPACE?
GENERAL RESULTS BY YEARS - IN HOW MANY
COWORKING SPACES HAVE YOU ALREADY WORKED?
23
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
1000 % 2000 % 3000 % 4000 %
2017
2016
2014
0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 %
3%
5%
8%
3%
8%
6%
11%
12%
9%
20%
17%
22%
24%
18%
16%
16%
13%
14%
24%
26%
26%
≤ 3 4 - 6 7 - 12 13 - 24 25 - 36 37 - 48 > 48 MONTHS
MEAN MEDIAN
5% TRIMMED
MEAN
17.6 1014.6
13.5 912.0
17,7 9.514.7
LENGTH OF CURRENT MEMBERSHIP
IN MONTHS
GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS
24
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
MEMBERSHIP FEE PAYER
3%
4%
6%1%
26%
44%
15%
MEMBER (PERSONAL EXPENSE) MEMBER (BUSINESS EXPENSE) EMPLOYER
CLIENT PAID WITH OTHER CAPITAL TYPE IT'S FREE
OTHER & N.A.
BY GENDER OF MEMBERS2017 RESULT
FEMALE MALE
1%
4% 3%
4% 5%
9%
1%
1%
23%
29%
51%
38%
17%15%
18-34 35-49 50 +
3%2%3%
3%2%
6%
13%
5%
8%
1%
2%
13%
18%
36%
53%57%
32%
16%16%15%
BY MEMBER AGE GROUPS
YEARS OLD
25
THE 2017
GLOBAL
COWORKING
SURVEY
REGULARITY OF MEMBERSHIP PAYMENT
GENERAL 2017 RESULT
0%
0%13%
11%
9%
83%
73%
2%
2%
3%
3%
1%
0%
HOURLY DAILY WEEKLY MONTHLY
OTHER** DON'T KNOW* N.A.
GENERAL 2017 RESULT - WITHOUT ‚DON'T KNOW‘ RESPONSES
3%
3%
*PLEASE NOTE: THE HIGH SHARE OF MEMBERS, WHO DON'T KNOW HOW OFTEN THEIR MEMBERSHIP IS RENEWED, IS MAINLY A RESULT OF
THE HIGH SHARE OF EMPLOYERS WHO FUND MEMBERSHIPS FOR THEIR EMPLOYEES. FOR THIS REASON, THE SECOND BAR PRESENTS THE
GENERAL RESULTS WITHOUT THE "DON'T KNOW" OPTION.
**'OTHER' INCLUDES MEMBERSHIPS THAT ARE PAID ANNUALLY, EVERY SIX MONTHS, QUARTERLY AND BI-WEEKLY. IT ALSO INCLUDES
LIMITED NO. OF DAY PASSES (E.G. 10-DAYS-PASSES), AND PAY-AS-YOU-WORK MEMBERSHIPS. THE 'OTHER' OPTION OFFERED OPEN
RESPONSES. THOSE RESPONSES WILL BE CONSIDERED IN THE 2018 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SUPPORT THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
AND RECEIVE MORE STATISTICS & CHARTS REPRESENTING
THE MEMBER OF COWORKING SPACES?
YES, GIMME MORE STATS!
ABOUT THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
NO COPIES ALLOWED. NOT FOR RESALE.© DESKMAG - CARSTEN FOERTSCH - CARSTEN @ DESKMAG.COM
PARTICIPANTS: 2011-12: 913, 2012-13: 1206, 2013-14: 1270, 2015-16: 1679, 2016-17: 1876
IN ORDER TO SIMPLIFY THE PRESENTATION, 2016-17 RESULTS ARE REFERRED TO BY THE YEAR 2017, WHILST 2015-16 RESULTS ARE REFERRED TO BY THE
YEAR 2016 AND SO ON. THIS IS BECAUSE THE SURVEY HAS ALWAYS BEEN CONDUCTED AT THE END OF EACH YEAR.
FINAL RESULTS ARE ANALYZED USING A COMPLEX STATISTICAL TOOL, AND ARE CHECKED USING QUALITY STANDARDS. IT IS FOR THIS REASON THAT THE
FIRST AND FINAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER SLIGHTLY. FINAL RESULTS ARE ALSO GROUPED BY DEMOGRAPHIC CATEGORIES & OTHER CRITERIA USING A BI-
OR MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS. READ THE RELATED ARTICLE AT BIT.LY/ALLABOUTMEMBERS
INTERESTED IN REGULAR UPDATES RELATING TO THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY?
JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER!
ANY QUESTION? DROP A LINE TO SURVEY @ DESKMAG.COM
"Social Workplaces are the physical nodes where the new generation of knowledgable connected workers find meaning in
work, well-being and are amplified in terms of business operations and goals. SocialWorkplaces.com’s #1 mission is to
connect these rising workplace communities.
The company organizes the Coworking Europe conference: the first international conference of its kind, where approximately
500 coworking stakeholders from more than 40 countries gather each year. In 2015, the company launched the Coworking
Africa conference and, more recently, introduced Coworking India, Coworking Middle East as well as the premium event “The
Social Workplace Conference.”
SocialWorkplaces.com
"Social Workplaces are the physical nodes where the new generation of knowledgable connected workers find meaning in
work, well-being and are amplified in terms of business operations and goals. SocialWorkplaces.com’s #1 mission is to
connect these rising workplace communities.
The company organizes the Coworking Europe conference: the first international conference of its kind, where approximately
500 coworking stakeholders from more than 40 countries gather each year. In 2015, the company launched the Coworking
Africa conference and, more recently, introduced Coworking India, Coworking Middle East as well as the premium event “The
Social Workplace Conference.”
SocialWorkplaces.com
27
COLLABORATION PARTNER OF THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY27
"Nexudus is a leading white-label
platform to help coworking space
operators with their day-to-day tasks.
Today, hundreds of spaces around the
world use Nexudus to spend less time
typing and chasing invoices, keeping
their communities engaged and up-
to-date, or controlling who is in and
out of the space and how it is used.
Nexudus is made for and by their
active community of users."
nexudus.com essensys.tech communitas.network
"Occupie, the essensys platform, is a
simple, easy to use software platform
that helps you manage your
workspace from lead to cash and
everything in between. Workspaces
can attract and retain customers, grow
additional income streams and gain
business insight to make quicker
decisions. We focus on ensuring that
your workspace can deliver the best
customer experience.”
"Communitas believes in the power of
community and the future of work.
Through a marketing agency, benefits
network, real estate advisory services
and world-class publications, we help
our clients better serve their
stakeholders. Whether you are a
builder of community or real estate,
Communitas is here for you.”
THE ‘MAIN SUPPORTERS’ PROVIDED FINANCIAL RESOURCES TO SUPPORT THE INDEPENDENT RESEARCH, AND WERE OFFICIAL PROMOTERS, OF THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY.
28
MAIN SUPPORTERS OF THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY28
WESERLAND
OFFICIAL SUPPORTERS OF THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
29 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
(ARITHMETIC) MEAN, 5% TRIMMED MEAN, MEDIAN…
WHY ARE THERE SO MANY DIFFERENT AVERAGE VALUES? ISN’T THERE A SIMPLER WAY?
SURE THERE IS! BUT REDUCING A SKEWED DEVELOPMENT TO A SINGLE VALUE WOULD NOT PROVIDE AN ACCURATE
REFLECTION OF THE COWORKING LANDSCAPE, WHICH HAS BECOME MORE DIVERSE OVER RECENT YEARS. IN FACT, THE
VALUES PRESENTED HEREIN ARE THREE OF DOZENS OF STATISTICAL MEASURES; SO, WE ARE STILL KEEPING IT QUITE
SIMPLE. THE (ARITHMETIC) MEAN IS THE MOST COMMON AVERAGE TO REPORT CENTRAL TENDENCIES; HOWEVER, IT IS
NOT ROBUST IF IT IS INFLUENCED BY OUTLIERS (EXTREME CASES, WHICH ARE MUCH LARGER OR SMALLER THAN MOST OF
THE OTHERS). FOR EXAMPLE, THINK OF AN UNEQUAL DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME, WHERE 10% OF PEOPLE IN YOUR
COUNTRY “EARN” 90% OF ALL INCOME. IF YOU TOOK THE MEAN OF THAT INCOME, THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE WOULD SEE
A HUGE GAP BETWEEN THE MEAN VALUE AND THE AMOUNT IN THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS. HENCE, IT WOULD NOT REFLECT
THEIR REALITY. THE COWORKING MARKET IS, OF COURSE, NOT THAT UNEQUAL; HOWEVER, THERE ARE COWORKING
SPACES (CHAINS) THAT CAN BE IDENTIFIED AS OUTLIERS, AND ARE MUCH BIGGER THAN MOST OTHER COWORKING
SPACES. FOR THIS REASON, WE PROVIDED TWO MORE AVERAGE VALUES: THE 5% TRIMMED MEAN CUTS THE HIGHEST
AND LOWEST 5% OF CASES, AND REFLECTS THE AVERAGE REALITY MUCH BETTER THAN THE ARITHMETIC MEAN; THE
MEDIAN SEPARATES THE UPPER HALF FROM THE LOWER HALF (IT IS SIMPLY THE VALUE IN THE MIDDLE). IT IS IMPORTANT
TO NOTE THAT MOST OF STATISTICS PRESENTED HEREIN ARE GROUPED, AND PRESENT THEIR SHARE TO REFLECT THE
WHOLE REALITY.
THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY PAGE 30
HOW TO READ THE STATISTICS?
HOW ARE THE (ARITHMETIC) MEAN, 5% TRIMMED MEAN, AND MEDIAN CALCULATED?
THE (ARITHMETIC) MEAN IS THE SUM OF A COLLECTION OF NUMBERS DIVIDED BY THE NUMBER OF VALUES IN THE
COLLECTION. CONFUSED? IMAGINE YOU HAVE TEN NUMBERS… NOW ADD THEM UP, AND THEN DIVIDE BY TEN:
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 4 + 5 + 5 + 6 + 9 + 19 = 58/10 = 5.8
THE 5% TRIMMED MEAN FIRST REMOVES THE HIGHEST AND LOWEST 5% OF A COLLECTION OF NUMBERS, SUMS THE REST,
AND DIVIDES THIS TOTAL BY THE NUMBER OF VALUES IN THE COLLECTION:
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 4 + 5 + 5 + 6 + 9 + 19 = 38/8 = 4.75 = 4.8 (ROUNDED)
THE MEDIAN IS THE MIDDLE NUMBER OF A COLLECTION OF VALUES. IT DIVIDES THE UPPER HALF BY THE LOWER HALF. IN
THIS CASE, WE HAVE AN EVEN NUMBER OF VALUES (TWO MIDDLE NUMBERS), WHICH ARE SUMED AND THEN DIVIDED. THIS
GIVES A FULLY TRUNCATED OR TRIMMED MEAN:
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 4 + 5 + 5 + 6 + 9 + 19 = (4 + 5)/2 = 4.5
SIDE NOTE: THE GREATER THE DIFFERENCE AMONG THE VALUES, THE GREATER THE COLLECTION OF UNEQUALLY
DISTRIBUTED VALUES. IF YOU’D LIKE TO CONSIDER ONLY A SINGLE NUMBER, GO WITH THE 5% TRIMMED MEAN.
HOWEVER, IT'S BETTER TO USE THE SHARE OF GROUPS PRESENTED IN THE CHARTS.
HOW TO READ THE STATISTICS?
THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY PAGE 31

More Related Content

What's hot

ZoomStart India : Coworking Space
ZoomStart India : Coworking SpaceZoomStart India : Coworking Space
ZoomStart India : Coworking Space
Tapaswi Patel
 
Car wash and cafe business plan
Car wash and cafe business planCar wash and cafe business plan
Car wash and cafe business plan
VinitaDevra
 
Case study
Case studyCase study
Case study
Bhupesh Sharma
 
The future of coworking space in India
The future of coworking space in IndiaThe future of coworking space in India
The future of coworking space in India
Shaswata Mukherjee
 
Case study refugee camp
Case study refugee campCase study refugee camp
Case study refugee camp
Aya A Nejim
 
Developing Multimedia and Value Added Services (VAS) on 4G and 4.5G for Telec...
Developing Multimedia and Value Added Services (VAS) on 4G and 4.5G for Telec...Developing Multimedia and Value Added Services (VAS) on 4G and 4.5G for Telec...
Developing Multimedia and Value Added Services (VAS) on 4G and 4.5G for Telec...
Ali Saghaeian
 
Marketin overview of Intercontinental Hotel Group (IHG)
Marketin overview of Intercontinental Hotel Group (IHG)Marketin overview of Intercontinental Hotel Group (IHG)
Marketin overview of Intercontinental Hotel Group (IHG)
yubraj balami
 
Co working
Co workingCo working
Co working
Yogesh Taylor
 
Architecture of new zealand
Architecture of new zealandArchitecture of new zealand
Architecture of new zealand
rachelletriste
 
Bcogent office, noida case study
Bcogent office, noida case studyBcogent office, noida case study
Bcogent office, noida case study
Manaswi Srivastava
 
Co-Working Space Report
Co-Working Space ReportCo-Working Space Report
Co-Working Space Report
Javan Smith
 
CoWorking Space Expansion plan
CoWorking Space Expansion planCoWorking Space Expansion plan
CoWorking Space Expansion plan
Rishabh Bharat
 
HCM vs Hanoi: images & characteristic gaps in Vietnam
HCM vs Hanoi: images & characteristic gaps in VietnamHCM vs Hanoi: images & characteristic gaps in Vietnam
HCM vs Hanoi: images & characteristic gaps in Vietnam
Q&Me Vietnam Market Research
 
Co-working HUB PRE THESIS.pptx
Co-working HUB PRE THESIS.pptxCo-working HUB PRE THESIS.pptx
Co-working HUB PRE THESIS.pptx
VeerReddy7
 
Dissertation - Aqua cities, Demand for a new habitation
Dissertation - Aqua cities, Demand for a new habitationDissertation - Aqua cities, Demand for a new habitation
Dissertation - Aqua cities, Demand for a new habitation
Ayushi Agrawal
 
Analysis and design of five star hotel
Analysis and design of five star hotelAnalysis and design of five star hotel
Analysis and design of five star hotel
Sakthigopal Muthukrishnan
 
Dubai blockchain
Dubai blockchainDubai blockchain
Dubai blockchain
Abbas Badran
 
Digital 2022 Vietnam (February 2022) v01
Digital 2022 Vietnam (February 2022) v01Digital 2022 Vietnam (February 2022) v01
Digital 2022 Vietnam (February 2022) v01
DataReportal
 
Real estate presentation ppt
Real estate presentation pptReal estate presentation ppt
Real estate presentation ppt
PavanJadhav33
 
CaseStudy Of Paliam Veedu.pdf
CaseStudy Of Paliam Veedu.pdfCaseStudy Of Paliam Veedu.pdf
CaseStudy Of Paliam Veedu.pdf
Omkar Tattu
 

What's hot (20)

ZoomStart India : Coworking Space
ZoomStart India : Coworking SpaceZoomStart India : Coworking Space
ZoomStart India : Coworking Space
 
Car wash and cafe business plan
Car wash and cafe business planCar wash and cafe business plan
Car wash and cafe business plan
 
Case study
Case studyCase study
Case study
 
The future of coworking space in India
The future of coworking space in IndiaThe future of coworking space in India
The future of coworking space in India
 
Case study refugee camp
Case study refugee campCase study refugee camp
Case study refugee camp
 
Developing Multimedia and Value Added Services (VAS) on 4G and 4.5G for Telec...
Developing Multimedia and Value Added Services (VAS) on 4G and 4.5G for Telec...Developing Multimedia and Value Added Services (VAS) on 4G and 4.5G for Telec...
Developing Multimedia and Value Added Services (VAS) on 4G and 4.5G for Telec...
 
Marketin overview of Intercontinental Hotel Group (IHG)
Marketin overview of Intercontinental Hotel Group (IHG)Marketin overview of Intercontinental Hotel Group (IHG)
Marketin overview of Intercontinental Hotel Group (IHG)
 
Co working
Co workingCo working
Co working
 
Architecture of new zealand
Architecture of new zealandArchitecture of new zealand
Architecture of new zealand
 
Bcogent office, noida case study
Bcogent office, noida case studyBcogent office, noida case study
Bcogent office, noida case study
 
Co-Working Space Report
Co-Working Space ReportCo-Working Space Report
Co-Working Space Report
 
CoWorking Space Expansion plan
CoWorking Space Expansion planCoWorking Space Expansion plan
CoWorking Space Expansion plan
 
HCM vs Hanoi: images & characteristic gaps in Vietnam
HCM vs Hanoi: images & characteristic gaps in VietnamHCM vs Hanoi: images & characteristic gaps in Vietnam
HCM vs Hanoi: images & characteristic gaps in Vietnam
 
Co-working HUB PRE THESIS.pptx
Co-working HUB PRE THESIS.pptxCo-working HUB PRE THESIS.pptx
Co-working HUB PRE THESIS.pptx
 
Dissertation - Aqua cities, Demand for a new habitation
Dissertation - Aqua cities, Demand for a new habitationDissertation - Aqua cities, Demand for a new habitation
Dissertation - Aqua cities, Demand for a new habitation
 
Analysis and design of five star hotel
Analysis and design of five star hotelAnalysis and design of five star hotel
Analysis and design of five star hotel
 
Dubai blockchain
Dubai blockchainDubai blockchain
Dubai blockchain
 
Digital 2022 Vietnam (February 2022) v01
Digital 2022 Vietnam (February 2022) v01Digital 2022 Vietnam (February 2022) v01
Digital 2022 Vietnam (February 2022) v01
 
Real estate presentation ppt
Real estate presentation pptReal estate presentation ppt
Real estate presentation ppt
 
CaseStudy Of Paliam Veedu.pdf
CaseStudy Of Paliam Veedu.pdfCaseStudy Of Paliam Veedu.pdf
CaseStudy Of Paliam Veedu.pdf
 

Viewers also liked

The 2nd Global Coworking Survey
The 2nd Global Coworking SurveyThe 2nd Global Coworking Survey
The 2nd Global Coworking Survey
Carsten Carstensen
 
Global Coworking Survey 2012
Global Coworking Survey 2012Global Coworking Survey 2012
Global Coworking Survey 2012
Deskwanted
 
Coworking in the USA 2016 - GCUCALL 2016
Coworking in the USA 2016 - GCUCALL 2016Coworking in the USA 2016 - GCUCALL 2016
Coworking in the USA 2016 - GCUCALL 2016
Deskmag The Coworking Magazine
 
The Coworking Revolution and the impact on real estate - Sophy Moffat, DTZ
The Coworking Revolution and the impact on real estate - Sophy Moffat, DTZ The Coworking Revolution and the impact on real estate - Sophy Moffat, DTZ
The Coworking Revolution and the impact on real estate - Sophy Moffat, DTZ
Coworking Conference
 
First results of the 2017 Global Coworking Survey
First results of the 2017 Global Coworking SurveyFirst results of the 2017 Global Coworking Survey
First results of the 2017 Global Coworking Survey
Deskmag The Coworking Magazine
 
Global Digital Statshot Q2 2017
Global Digital Statshot Q2 2017Global Digital Statshot Q2 2017
Global Digital Statshot Q2 2017
We Are Social Singapore
 

Viewers also liked (6)

The 2nd Global Coworking Survey
The 2nd Global Coworking SurveyThe 2nd Global Coworking Survey
The 2nd Global Coworking Survey
 
Global Coworking Survey 2012
Global Coworking Survey 2012Global Coworking Survey 2012
Global Coworking Survey 2012
 
Coworking in the USA 2016 - GCUCALL 2016
Coworking in the USA 2016 - GCUCALL 2016Coworking in the USA 2016 - GCUCALL 2016
Coworking in the USA 2016 - GCUCALL 2016
 
The Coworking Revolution and the impact on real estate - Sophy Moffat, DTZ
The Coworking Revolution and the impact on real estate - Sophy Moffat, DTZ The Coworking Revolution and the impact on real estate - Sophy Moffat, DTZ
The Coworking Revolution and the impact on real estate - Sophy Moffat, DTZ
 
First results of the 2017 Global Coworking Survey
First results of the 2017 Global Coworking SurveyFirst results of the 2017 Global Coworking Survey
First results of the 2017 Global Coworking Survey
 
Global Digital Statshot Q2 2017
Global Digital Statshot Q2 2017Global Digital Statshot Q2 2017
Global Digital Statshot Q2 2017
 

Similar to Utilization of Coworking Spaces - Members of Coworking Spaces Part 2 of 2

2018 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
2018 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY 2018 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
2018 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
Peerasak C.
 
Cielo's 2017 Americas Talent Rising Summit - Day 2 Deck
Cielo's 2017 Americas Talent Rising Summit - Day 2 DeckCielo's 2017 Americas Talent Rising Summit - Day 2 Deck
Cielo's 2017 Americas Talent Rising Summit - Day 2 Deck
Cielo
 
1615 track1 schleicher
1615 track1 schleicher1615 track1 schleicher
1615 track1 schleicher
Rising Media, Inc.
 
1st Results Of The Global Coworking Survey 2015-16
1st Results Of The Global Coworking Survey 2015-161st Results Of The Global Coworking Survey 2015-16
1st Results Of The Global Coworking Survey 2015-16
Deskmag The Coworking Magazine
 
Mind of the Engineer
Mind of the EngineerMind of the Engineer
Mind of the Engineer
Steven Carlisle
 
Using ROI Methodology to Document the Benefits of King County GIS
Using ROI Methodology to Document the Benefits of King County GISUsing ROI Methodology to Document the Benefits of King County GIS
Using ROI Methodology to Document the Benefits of King County GIS
Greg Babinski
 
HR Shared Services Benchmarking Study Highlights: May 2017
HR Shared Services Benchmarking Study Highlights: May 2017HR Shared Services Benchmarking Study Highlights: May 2017
HR Shared Services Benchmarking Study Highlights: May 2017
ScottMadden, Inc.
 
The Emergence of Business Agility
The Emergence of Business AgilityThe Emergence of Business Agility
The Emergence of Business Agility
Jose Casal-Gimenez FBCS CITP
 
1440 track1 noriega
1440 track1 noriega1440 track1 noriega
1440 track1 noriega
Rising Media, Inc.
 
Opticon 2017 Hooked: How to Succeed
Opticon 2017 Hooked: How to SucceedOpticon 2017 Hooked: How to Succeed
Opticon 2017 Hooked: How to Succeed
Optimizely
 
Agricultural Chemicals 2016 Supply Chain Benchmarking Study
Agricultural Chemicals 2016 Supply Chain Benchmarking StudyAgricultural Chemicals 2016 Supply Chain Benchmarking Study
Agricultural Chemicals 2016 Supply Chain Benchmarking Study
accenture
 
Lasting Impressions: Candidate Interview to Offer
Lasting Impressions: Candidate Interview to OfferLasting Impressions: Candidate Interview to Offer
Lasting Impressions: Candidate Interview to Offer
Cielo
 
Supplemental inputs in budget preparation
Supplemental inputs  in  budget preparationSupplemental inputs  in  budget preparation
Supplemental inputs in budget preparation
Rafael Paragas
 
2017 lm warehouse_ops_trending_study_113017
2017 lm warehouse_ops_trending_study_1130172017 lm warehouse_ops_trending_study_113017
2017 lm warehouse_ops_trending_study_113017
PRABIR DATTA
 
The AIESECer Survey March 2017
The AIESECer Survey March 2017The AIESECer Survey March 2017
The AIESECer Survey March 2017
AIESEC
 
First Impressions: Candidate Attraction to Application
First Impressions: Candidate Attraction to ApplicationFirst Impressions: Candidate Attraction to Application
First Impressions: Candidate Attraction to Application
Cielo
 
Salary trends for 2017
Salary trends for 2017Salary trends for 2017
Salary trends for 2017
Marketing Durban Chamber
 
Benchpress report 2018
Benchpress report 2018Benchpress report 2018
Benchpress report 2018
MailNinja
 
Winnebago Industries Investor Day Presentation
Winnebago Industries Investor Day PresentationWinnebago Industries Investor Day Presentation
Winnebago Industries Investor Day Presentation
WinnebagoInd
 
2017 Bike to Work Day Survey Results
2017 Bike to Work Day Survey Results2017 Bike to Work Day Survey Results
2017 Bike to Work Day Survey Results
Valerie Hermanson AICP
 

Similar to Utilization of Coworking Spaces - Members of Coworking Spaces Part 2 of 2 (20)

2018 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
2018 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY 2018 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
2018 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
 
Cielo's 2017 Americas Talent Rising Summit - Day 2 Deck
Cielo's 2017 Americas Talent Rising Summit - Day 2 DeckCielo's 2017 Americas Talent Rising Summit - Day 2 Deck
Cielo's 2017 Americas Talent Rising Summit - Day 2 Deck
 
1615 track1 schleicher
1615 track1 schleicher1615 track1 schleicher
1615 track1 schleicher
 
1st Results Of The Global Coworking Survey 2015-16
1st Results Of The Global Coworking Survey 2015-161st Results Of The Global Coworking Survey 2015-16
1st Results Of The Global Coworking Survey 2015-16
 
Mind of the Engineer
Mind of the EngineerMind of the Engineer
Mind of the Engineer
 
Using ROI Methodology to Document the Benefits of King County GIS
Using ROI Methodology to Document the Benefits of King County GISUsing ROI Methodology to Document the Benefits of King County GIS
Using ROI Methodology to Document the Benefits of King County GIS
 
HR Shared Services Benchmarking Study Highlights: May 2017
HR Shared Services Benchmarking Study Highlights: May 2017HR Shared Services Benchmarking Study Highlights: May 2017
HR Shared Services Benchmarking Study Highlights: May 2017
 
The Emergence of Business Agility
The Emergence of Business AgilityThe Emergence of Business Agility
The Emergence of Business Agility
 
1440 track1 noriega
1440 track1 noriega1440 track1 noriega
1440 track1 noriega
 
Opticon 2017 Hooked: How to Succeed
Opticon 2017 Hooked: How to SucceedOpticon 2017 Hooked: How to Succeed
Opticon 2017 Hooked: How to Succeed
 
Agricultural Chemicals 2016 Supply Chain Benchmarking Study
Agricultural Chemicals 2016 Supply Chain Benchmarking StudyAgricultural Chemicals 2016 Supply Chain Benchmarking Study
Agricultural Chemicals 2016 Supply Chain Benchmarking Study
 
Lasting Impressions: Candidate Interview to Offer
Lasting Impressions: Candidate Interview to OfferLasting Impressions: Candidate Interview to Offer
Lasting Impressions: Candidate Interview to Offer
 
Supplemental inputs in budget preparation
Supplemental inputs  in  budget preparationSupplemental inputs  in  budget preparation
Supplemental inputs in budget preparation
 
2017 lm warehouse_ops_trending_study_113017
2017 lm warehouse_ops_trending_study_1130172017 lm warehouse_ops_trending_study_113017
2017 lm warehouse_ops_trending_study_113017
 
The AIESECer Survey March 2017
The AIESECer Survey March 2017The AIESECer Survey March 2017
The AIESECer Survey March 2017
 
First Impressions: Candidate Attraction to Application
First Impressions: Candidate Attraction to ApplicationFirst Impressions: Candidate Attraction to Application
First Impressions: Candidate Attraction to Application
 
Salary trends for 2017
Salary trends for 2017Salary trends for 2017
Salary trends for 2017
 
Benchpress report 2018
Benchpress report 2018Benchpress report 2018
Benchpress report 2018
 
Winnebago Industries Investor Day Presentation
Winnebago Industries Investor Day PresentationWinnebago Industries Investor Day Presentation
Winnebago Industries Investor Day Presentation
 
2017 Bike to Work Day Survey Results
2017 Bike to Work Day Survey Results2017 Bike to Work Day Survey Results
2017 Bike to Work Day Survey Results
 

Recently uploaded

欧洲杯赌球-欧洲杯赌球买球官方官网-欧洲杯赌球比赛投注官网|【​网址​🎉ac55.net🎉​】
欧洲杯赌球-欧洲杯赌球买球官方官网-欧洲杯赌球比赛投注官网|【​网址​🎉ac55.net🎉​】欧洲杯赌球-欧洲杯赌球买球官方官网-欧洲杯赌球比赛投注官网|【​网址​🎉ac55.net🎉​】
欧洲杯赌球-欧洲杯赌球买球官方官网-欧洲杯赌球比赛投注官网|【​网址​🎉ac55.net🎉​】
valvereliz227
 
Efficient PHP Development Solutions for Dynamic Web Applications
Efficient PHP Development Solutions for Dynamic Web ApplicationsEfficient PHP Development Solutions for Dynamic Web Applications
Efficient PHP Development Solutions for Dynamic Web Applications
Harwinder Singh
 
8328958814KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN
8328958814KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN8328958814KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN
8328958814KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN
➑➌➋➑➒➎➑➑➊➍
 
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan ChartSatta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results
 
Prescriptive analytics BA4206 Anna University PPT
Prescriptive analytics BA4206 Anna University PPTPrescriptive analytics BA4206 Anna University PPT
Prescriptive analytics BA4206 Anna University PPT
Freelance
 
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on Investing in AI for ABS Alu...
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on Investing in AI for ABS Alu...Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on Investing in AI for ABS Alu...
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on Investing in AI for ABS Alu...
Herman Kienhuis
 
Kirill Klip GEM Royalty TNR Gold Lithium Presentation
Kirill Klip GEM Royalty TNR Gold Lithium PresentationKirill Klip GEM Royalty TNR Gold Lithium Presentation
Kirill Klip GEM Royalty TNR Gold Lithium Presentation
Kirill Klip
 
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan ChartSatta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results
 
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian MatkaDpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
➒➌➎➏➑➐➋➑➐➐Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
 
PM Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana: Online Application, Eligibility, Subsidies &...
PM Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana: Online Application, Eligibility, Subsidies &...PM Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana: Online Application, Eligibility, Subsidies &...
PM Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana: Online Application, Eligibility, Subsidies &...
Ksquare Energy Pvt. Ltd.
 
IMG_20240615_091110.pdf dpboss guessing
IMG_20240615_091110.pdf dpboss  guessingIMG_20240615_091110.pdf dpboss  guessing
Sustainable Logistics for Cost Reduction_ IPLTech Electric's Eco-Friendly Tra...
Sustainable Logistics for Cost Reduction_ IPLTech Electric's Eco-Friendly Tra...Sustainable Logistics for Cost Reduction_ IPLTech Electric's Eco-Friendly Tra...
Sustainable Logistics for Cost Reduction_ IPLTech Electric's Eco-Friendly Tra...
IPLTech Electric
 
NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...
NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...
NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...
BBPMedia1
 
The Role of White Label Bookkeeping Services in Supporting the Growth and Sca...
The Role of White Label Bookkeeping Services in Supporting the Growth and Sca...The Role of White Label Bookkeeping Services in Supporting the Growth and Sca...
The Role of White Label Bookkeeping Services in Supporting the Growth and Sca...
YourLegal Accounting
 
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan ChartSatta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results
 
deft. 2024 pricing guide for onboarding
deft.  2024 pricing guide for onboardingdeft.  2024 pricing guide for onboarding
deft. 2024 pricing guide for onboarding
hello960827
 
Registered-Establishment-List-in-Uttarakhand-pdf.pdf
Registered-Establishment-List-in-Uttarakhand-pdf.pdfRegistered-Establishment-List-in-Uttarakhand-pdf.pdf
Registered-Establishment-List-in-Uttarakhand-pdf.pdf
dazzjoker
 
Pro Tips for Effortless Contract Management
Pro Tips for Effortless Contract ManagementPro Tips for Effortless Contract Management
Pro Tips for Effortless Contract Management
Eternity Paralegal Services
 
State of D2C in India: A Logistics Update
State of D2C in India: A Logistics UpdateState of D2C in India: A Logistics Update
State of D2C in India: A Logistics Update
RedSeer
 
1Q24_HYUNDAI CAPITAL SERVICES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
1Q24_HYUNDAI CAPITAL SERVICES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES1Q24_HYUNDAI CAPITAL SERVICES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
1Q24_HYUNDAI CAPITAL SERVICES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
irhcs
 

Recently uploaded (20)

欧洲杯赌球-欧洲杯赌球买球官方官网-欧洲杯赌球比赛投注官网|【​网址​🎉ac55.net🎉​】
欧洲杯赌球-欧洲杯赌球买球官方官网-欧洲杯赌球比赛投注官网|【​网址​🎉ac55.net🎉​】欧洲杯赌球-欧洲杯赌球买球官方官网-欧洲杯赌球比赛投注官网|【​网址​🎉ac55.net🎉​】
欧洲杯赌球-欧洲杯赌球买球官方官网-欧洲杯赌球比赛投注官网|【​网址​🎉ac55.net🎉​】
 
Efficient PHP Development Solutions for Dynamic Web Applications
Efficient PHP Development Solutions for Dynamic Web ApplicationsEfficient PHP Development Solutions for Dynamic Web Applications
Efficient PHP Development Solutions for Dynamic Web Applications
 
8328958814KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN
8328958814KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN8328958814KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN
8328958814KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN
 
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan ChartSatta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
 
Prescriptive analytics BA4206 Anna University PPT
Prescriptive analytics BA4206 Anna University PPTPrescriptive analytics BA4206 Anna University PPT
Prescriptive analytics BA4206 Anna University PPT
 
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on Investing in AI for ABS Alu...
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on Investing in AI for ABS Alu...Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on Investing in AI for ABS Alu...
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on Investing in AI for ABS Alu...
 
Kirill Klip GEM Royalty TNR Gold Lithium Presentation
Kirill Klip GEM Royalty TNR Gold Lithium PresentationKirill Klip GEM Royalty TNR Gold Lithium Presentation
Kirill Klip GEM Royalty TNR Gold Lithium Presentation
 
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan ChartSatta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
 
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian MatkaDpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
Dpboss Matka Guessing Satta Matta Matka Kalyan Chart Indian Matka
 
PM Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana: Online Application, Eligibility, Subsidies &...
PM Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana: Online Application, Eligibility, Subsidies &...PM Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana: Online Application, Eligibility, Subsidies &...
PM Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana: Online Application, Eligibility, Subsidies &...
 
IMG_20240615_091110.pdf dpboss guessing
IMG_20240615_091110.pdf dpboss  guessingIMG_20240615_091110.pdf dpboss  guessing
IMG_20240615_091110.pdf dpboss guessing
 
Sustainable Logistics for Cost Reduction_ IPLTech Electric's Eco-Friendly Tra...
Sustainable Logistics for Cost Reduction_ IPLTech Electric's Eco-Friendly Tra...Sustainable Logistics for Cost Reduction_ IPLTech Electric's Eco-Friendly Tra...
Sustainable Logistics for Cost Reduction_ IPLTech Electric's Eco-Friendly Tra...
 
NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...
NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...
NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...
 
The Role of White Label Bookkeeping Services in Supporting the Growth and Sca...
The Role of White Label Bookkeeping Services in Supporting the Growth and Sca...The Role of White Label Bookkeeping Services in Supporting the Growth and Sca...
The Role of White Label Bookkeeping Services in Supporting the Growth and Sca...
 
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan ChartSatta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
Satta Matka Dpboss Kalyan Matka Results Kalyan Chart
 
deft. 2024 pricing guide for onboarding
deft.  2024 pricing guide for onboardingdeft.  2024 pricing guide for onboarding
deft. 2024 pricing guide for onboarding
 
Registered-Establishment-List-in-Uttarakhand-pdf.pdf
Registered-Establishment-List-in-Uttarakhand-pdf.pdfRegistered-Establishment-List-in-Uttarakhand-pdf.pdf
Registered-Establishment-List-in-Uttarakhand-pdf.pdf
 
Pro Tips for Effortless Contract Management
Pro Tips for Effortless Contract ManagementPro Tips for Effortless Contract Management
Pro Tips for Effortless Contract Management
 
State of D2C in India: A Logistics Update
State of D2C in India: A Logistics UpdateState of D2C in India: A Logistics Update
State of D2C in India: A Logistics Update
 
1Q24_HYUNDAI CAPITAL SERVICES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
1Q24_HYUNDAI CAPITAL SERVICES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES1Q24_HYUNDAI CAPITAL SERVICES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
1Q24_HYUNDAI CAPITAL SERVICES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 

Utilization of Coworking Spaces - Members of Coworking Spaces Part 2 of 2

  • 1. THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY RESEARCH SUPPORTED BYIN COLLABORATION WITH READ MORE AT BIT.LY/ALLABOUTMEMBERS VISUALS FROM THE FINAL 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY RESULTS SELECTED SLIDES WITH CHARTS ULTIMATE MEMBER DATA: UTILIZATION OF COWORKING SPACES
  • 2. 2 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY MONTH OF JOINING A COWORKING SPACE FOR THE FIRST TIME 0% 3% 6% 9% 12% 15% JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER 2% 8% 9% 13% 9% 9% 7%7% 9% 8% 7% 14% 3% 9% 11% 12% 9% 5% 8% 7% 9% 6% 7% 15% 4% 7% 11% 12% 9% 8% 8% 6%6% 11% 6% 13% 2017 2016 2014 1ST PEAK 2ND PEAK GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS THIS CHART REPRESENTS THE GLOBAL AVERAGE AND THE RESPONSES ARE DOMINATED BY COWORKING SPACES IN THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE WHERE MOST OF COWORKING SPACES ARE LOCATED. FOR THE SAME REASON, THE RESULTS ARE ALSO STRONGLY INFLUENCED BY THE CHRISTIAN CULTURE. THE RESULTS CAN STRONGLY DIFFER IN REGIONS WITH A DIFFERENT CULTURE AND GEOGRAPHIC AREA. IN THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE, DECEMBER MARKS A LOW AS WELL. PEAKS ARE AUGUST- OCTOBER & MARCH. INDEPENDENT OF THE CULTURES AND GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION, NEW MEMBERS USUALLY SIGN UP IN THE WEEKS FOLLOWING POPULAR HOLIDAYS IN THEIR REGIONS.
  • 3. 3 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS 1000 % 2000 % 3000 % 4000 % REASONS WHY COWORKING SPACES ARE CHOSEN A SOCIAL & ENJOYABLE ATMOSPHERE INTERACTION WITH OTHERS A COMMUNITY A CLOSE DISTANCE TO MY HOME LIKE-MINDED PEOPLE GOOD VALUE FOR MONEY GOOD TRANSPORT CONNECTIONS NEARBY BASIC OFFICE INFRASTRUCTURE KNOWLEDGE SHARING A BIG OPEN WORKSPACE FLEXIBLE WORKTIMES MEETING SPACES EVENTS RANDOM DISCOVERIES A CLEAN WORKSPACE INTERDISCIPLINARY WORK GOOD INTERNET CONNECTIONS FRIENDS WHO ALREADY WORKED HERE MY COMPANY OR CLIENT PAYS FOR IT WORKSHOPS SUPERMARKETS OR RESTAURANTS NEARBY PRIVATE OFFICES SPECIAL INFRASTRUCTURE (E.G. 3D-PRINTER) 1875 % 3750 % 5625 % 7500 % 7% 15% 17% 13% 27% 44% 24% 41% 48% 37% 45% 36% 32% 37% 57% 41% 39% 58% 44% 72% 74% 66% 3% 8% 14% 15% 15% 15% 25% 25% 27% 27% 31% 31% 34% 34% 35% 38% 41% 41% 47% 51% 55% 56% 59% 2017 2016
  • 4. 4 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY GENERIC WORKSPACE BEFORE BECOMING A MEMBER 2017* 2016 2014 2012 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 3% 5% 4% 3% 1% 1% 3% 1% 6% 6% 4% 3% 1% 2% 1% 3% 4% 6% 4% 6% 5% 1% 3% 3% 22% 23% 37% 26% 58% 56% 45% 45%10% ANOTHER COWORKING SPACE* AT HOME TRADITIONAL OFFICE SMALL SHARED OFFICE COFFEE SHOP BUSINESS CENTER NO FIXED LOCATION LIBRARY OTHER & N.A. *PLEASE NOTE: THIS QUESTION WAS CHANGED FOR THE 2017 SURVEY FROM "WHERE DID YOU MOSTLY WORK BEFORE YOU STARTED USING A COWORKING SPACE?" TO "WHERE DID YOU MOSTLY WORK BEFORE YOU STARTED USING YOUR CURRENT COWORKING SPACE?". FOR THIS REASON A NEW ANSWER CHOICE, ‘ANOTHER COWORKING SPACE’, HAS BEEN INTRODUCED TO PORTRAY THE CHANGE IN QUESTION AND ALLOW EXISTING COWORKING MEMBERS TO EXPRESS THAT THEY MOVED FROM ONE COWORKING SPACE TO ANOTHER. GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS
  • 5. 5 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY 2017* 2016 2014 2012 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 3% 5% 4% 4% 1% 1% 3% 1% 6% 6% 4% 4% 1% 2% 1% 3% 4% 6% 4% 6% 5% 1% 3% 4% 22% 23% 37% 29% 58% 56% 45% 49% ANOTHER COWORKING SPACE* AT HOME TRADITIONAL OFFICE SMALL SHARED OFFICE COFFEE SHOP BUSINESS CENTER NO FIXED LOCATION LIBRARY OTHER & N.A. GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS WITHOUT COWORKING SPACES *PLEASE NOTE: THIS QUESTION WAS CHANGED FOR THE 2017 SURVEY FROM "WHERE DID YOU MOSTLY WORK BEFORE YOU STARTED USING A COWORKING SPACE?" TO "WHERE DID YOU MOSTLY WORK BEFORE YOU STARTED USING YOUR CURRENT COWORKING SPACE?". FOR THIS REASON A NEW ANSWER CHOICE, ‘ANOTHER COWORKING SPACE’, WAS INTRODUCED ON THE PREVIOUS SLIDE TO ALLOW EXISTING COWORKING MEMBERS TO EXPRESS THAT THEY MOVED FROM ONE COWORKING SPACE TO ANOTHER. THIS CHART PRESENTS THE (NON-COMPARABLE) RESULTS WITHOUT THE NEW CHOICE. GENERIC WORKSPACE BEFORE BECOMING A MEMBER
  • 6. WORD OF MOUTH INTERNET SEARCH (MY) COMPANY OR CLIENT MEDIA (INCL. SOCIAL MEDIA) PASSED BY LISTING DIRECTORY ADVERTISING OTHER & N.A. 1000 % 2000 % 3000 % 4000 % 11% 1% 4% 5% 11% 12% 23% 33% SOURCE OF LEADS BEFORE BECOMING A MEMBER 6 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY GENERAL 2017 RESULT RESPONSES FOR THIS DATA CANNOT BE COMPARED TO PREVIOUS YEARS DUE TO MINOR DIFFERENCES IN THE QUESTION PRESENTED. IN PREVIOUS YEARS, WE HAD ASKED MEMBERS: "HOW DID YOU FIRST HEAR ABOUT YOUR COWORKING SPACE" AND IN 2017 WE ASKED MEMBERS: "HOW DID YOU FIND YOUR CURRENT COWORKING SPACE BEFORE YOU BECAME A MEMBER?" PRIOR TO 2017, MEMBERS WERE ALSO ALLOWED TO PROVIDE MULTIPLE ANSWERS TO THE QUESTION, WHEREAS IN 2017 MEMBERS WERE ASKED TO PROVIDE JUST ONE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION. DESPITE THESE CHANGES, 'WORD OF MOUTH' REMAINED THE MOST POPULAR RESPONSE TO BOTH QUESTIONS. 
  • 7. 7 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY MEMBER COMMUTING TIMES & TRANSPORT TYPES OF MEMBERS *'SCOOTERS’ AND ‘MOTOR BIKES’ WERE NOT OPTIONAL ANSWERS BEFORE 2017 & IN **2012: "OTHER" WAS NOT AN OPTION YET. PLEASE NOTE: DIFFERENCES MAY OCCUR DUE TO THE TIME AT WHICH THE SURVEY WAS TAKEN: THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED IN NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2016, WHILST THE 2016 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED IN OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER 2015. GENERALLY, TRANSPORT TYPES CAN STRONGLY DEPEND ON CHANGING WEATHER CONDITIONS THAT ALSO INFLUENCE COMMUTING TIMES. 2017* 2016 2014 2012** 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 1% 6% 2% 4% 34% 39% 28% 35% 34% 26% 24% 27%3% 17% 14% 25% 14% 14% 16% 21% 18% ON FOOT BY BIKE BY SCOOTER BY PUBLIC TRANSPORT BY CAR N.A. & OTHER MEAN MEDIAN 22.4 20 22.9 20 21.4 15 5% TRIMMED MEAN 22.4 2021 19.5 21.2 20.6 GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS 2017 2016 2014 2012 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 2% 2% 4% 2% 5% 9% 7% 8% 8% 6% 6% 11% 22% 23% 15% 19% 14% 17% 14% 16% 25% 19% 17% 17% 17% 18% 22% 16% 7% 7% 14% 11% 0 - 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 60 > 60 MINUTES
  • 8. 8 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY MEMBER WORK HOURS & FREQUENCY OF COWORKING SPACE USAGE 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 1AM 2AM 3AM 4AM 5AM 6AM 7AM 8AM 9AM 10AM 11AM NOON 1PM 2PM 3PM 4PM 5PM 6PM 7PM 8PM 9PM 10PM 11PM 12AM START END 5% TRIMMED MEAN: 8:55 AM MEAN: 9:04 AM MEDIAN: 9:00 AM 5% TRIMMED MEAN: 5:46 PM MEAN: 5:20 PM MEDIAN: 6:00 PM 9H 3MIN* AVERAGE LENGTH OF A WORKING DAY (INCLUDING BREAKS)* MEAN: 8H 58MIN - MEDIAN: 9H 5% TRIMMED MEAN 22% WORK AT IRREGULAR TIMES & COULDN'T RESPOND TO THIS QUESTION 2017 2016 2014 2012 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 3% 1% 2% 3% 2% 4% 14% 16% 11% 9% 26% 28% 15% 17% 28% 24% 29% 31% 32% 26% 43% 38% 5 TIMES A WEEK OR MORE OFTEN* 3 OR 4 TIMES A WEEK 1 OR 2 TIMES A WEEK 1 TO 4 TIMES A MONTH LESS THAN ONCE A MONTH N.A. & OTHER *DAILY(IN2012) MEMBER WORK HOURS - GENERAL RESULTS WORKING DAY FREQUENCY OF COWORKING SPACE USAGE BY YEAR PLEASE NOTE: THIS CHART SHOWS WHEN MEMBERS USUALLY START & END THEIR WORKING DAYS. IT DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN THEY SPEND EVERY HOUR WITHIN THE COWORKING SPACE. THE NEXT TOPIC PRESENTS DATA OF MEMBERS WHO ALSO WORK OUTSIDE THEIR COWORKING SPACES. *AVERAGES ARE CALCULATED BASED ON THE START AND END TIME OF EACH INDIVIDUAL MEMBER.
  • 9. 9 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY MEMBERS WHO WORK OUTSIDE THEIR COWORKING SPACES 2017 2016 2014 2012 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 1% 5% 2% 3% 9% 9% 12% 15% 90% 86% 87% 82% YES NO DON'T KNOW & N.A. MOST POPULAR ALTERNATIVE WORKSPACES USED BY MEMBERS* AT HOME COFFEE SHOP LIBRARY BUSINESS CENTER OTHER 2125 % 4250 % 6375 % 8500 % 4% 1% 1% 15% 16% 80% 5% 1% 4% 17% 13% 82% 6% 1% 6% 18% 16% 69% 4% 3% 4% 16% 16% 67% 2017 2016 2014 2012 NO. 1 'OTHER' RESPONSE: CLIENT'S OFFICE, FOLLOWED BY: TRAIN, UNIVERSITY, FRIEND'S PLACE & ANOTHER COWORKING SPACE SMALL SHARED OFFICE COMMUNITY TRADITIONAL OFFICE & *PRESENTS THE % OF MEMBERS WHO WORK OFTEN OUTSIDE THEIR COWORKING SPACE GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS
  • 10. 10 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY MULTIPLE MEMBERSHIPS & USE OF COWORKING VISA PROGRAMS 2017 2016 2014 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 2% 1% 1% 92% 92% 92% 7% 7% 7% YES NO DON'T KNOW OR N.A. HAVE YOU EVER USED A MEMBERSHIP OR VISA PROGRAM TO WORK FROM OTHER COWORKING SPACES? 2017 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 1%89%10% 2017 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 2%70%28% 2017 2016 2014 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 6% 3% 2% 71% 74% 79% 23% 22% 19% DO YOU CURRENTLY HAVE A MEMBERSHIP FOR MORE THAN ONE COWORKING SPACE? GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS ALL MEMBERS (CALCULATED RESULT) MEMBERS WHO PREVIOUSLY WORKED FROM MORE THAN ONE COWORKING SPACE PLEASE NOTE: OPTIONAL ANSWERS OF THIS QUESTION WERE SIMPLIFIED FOR THE 2017 SURVEY - HENCE COMPARABLE DATA FOR PREVIOUS YEARS IS NOT AVAILABLE. HOWEVER, WE CAN CONFIRM THAT THE AMOUNT OF RESPONDENTS WHO ANSWERED “YES” TO THIS QUESTION SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED.
  • 11. 11 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 2% 1%12%59%26% HIP & TRENDY CASUAL BUSINESS CASUAL SUIT & TIE N.A. & OTHER GENERAL 2017 RESULT BY GENDER OF MEMBERS BY MEMBER AGE GROUPS FEMALE MALE 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 1% 2% 1% 1% 12% 10% 60% 62% 27% 25% 18 - 34 YEARS OLD 35-49 YEARS OLD 50 + YEARS OLD 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 3% 2% 1% 3% 1% 13% 8% 13% 53% 71% 55% 29% 20% 30% MEMBER WORK ENVIRONMENT
  • 12. 12 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY MEMBER WORK ARRANGEMENT & PREFERRED ARRANGEMENT GENERAL RESULTS BY YEAR STATUS QUO PREFERENCE 2017 2016 2014 2012 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 1% 2% 1% 2% 23% 19% 21% 24% 11% 11% 13% 15% 13% 8% 9% 7% 53% 60% 56% 51% ON THEIR OWN IN SPONTANEOUS & FREQUENTLY CHANGING TEAMS IN REGULAR BUT CHANGING TEAMS IN A PERMANENTLY FIXED TEAM N.A. 2017 2016 2014 2012 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 1%19%31%12%37% QUESTION WAS NOT PART OF THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY BEFORE 2017
  • 13. 13 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY CURRENT DESK TYPES OF MEMBERS & PREFERRED DESK TYPES 2017* 2016 2014 2012 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 2% 66% 63% 47% 54% 11% 12% 11% 24% 25% 42% 44% DEDICATED DESK MAINLY AT A DEDICATED DESK* FLEXIBILE DESK N.A. GENERAL RESULTS BY YEAR 2017 2016 2014 2012 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 1% 2% 52% 53% 35% 38% 22%26% 47% 64% 61% *PLEASE NOTE: OPTIONAL ANSWERS WERE SIMPLIFIED FOR THE 2017 SURVEY. "MAINLY AT A DEDICATED DESK" WAS REMOVED AS A POSSIBLE ANSWER FROM THE ‘STATUS QUO’ QUESTION. STATUS QUO PREFERENCE
  • 14. 14 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY MEMBER WORKSPACE ACCESS TYPE & PREFERRED LEVEL OF ACCESS GENERAL RESULTS BY YEARS 2017 2016 2014 2012 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 3% 10% 13% 11% 7% 5% 3% 2% 1% 38% 37% 32% 31% 47% 48% 55% 59% 24/7 TRADITIONAL OFFICE HOURS HALF-DAYS LIMITED DAYS OR HOURS PER MONTH N.A. 2017 2016 2014 2012 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 2% 3% 12% 7% 4% 5% 4% 6% 31% 35% 35% 51% 53% 52% STATUS QUO PREFERENCE PLEASE NOTE: IN 2017 THIS QUESTION ABOUT THE PREFERENCE WAS NOT PART OF THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
  • 15. 15 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY MEMBER WORKSPACE AREAS & PREFERRED WORKSPACE AREAS 2017 2016 2014 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 5% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 1% 2% 3% 5% 6% 9% 13% 13% 79% 76% 74% OPEN WORKSPACE TEAM OFFICE SINGLE OFFICE COFFEE AREAS MEETING ROOM OTHER & N.A. GENERAL RESULTS BY YEARS PLEASE NOTE: OPEN WORKSPACES OFFER MORE FLEXIBLE (SHARED) DESKS, RESULTING IN A HIGHER SHARE OF MEMBERS WHO CAN USE AN OPEN WORKSPACE (COMPARED TO TEAM OFFICES & SINGLE OFFICES THAT MAINLY OFFER DESKS DEDICATED TO ONE MEMBER). FURTHERMORE, THIS QUESTION WAS INTRODUCED IN THE 2014 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY WHEN MORE COWORKING SPACES INTEGRATED PRIVATE OFFICES INTO THEIR WORKSPACES. NO DATA AVAILABLE PRIOR TO 2014. 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 6% 4% 3% 2% 4%15% 11% 15% 20% 58% 63% STATUS QUO PREFERENCE PLEASE NOTE: IN 2017 THIS QUESTION ABOUT THE PREFERENCE WAS NOT PART OF THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
  • 16. 16 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY MAXIMUM NO. OF WORKSTATIONS OF THEIR COWORKING SPACES 2017 2016 2014 2012 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 8% 8% 14% 24% 24% 22% 23% 23% 34% 32% 29% 27% 34% 38% 34% 26% < 25 WORKSTATIONS 25 - 49 WORKSTATIONS 50 - 99 WORKSTATIONS ≥ 100 WORKSTATIONS GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS MEAN MEDIAN 5% TRIMMED MEAN 40 30 40 30 72 4057 36 37 55 4045 PLEASE NOTE: THE VALUES IN THE CHART ABOVE REPRESENT THE REPORTS OF MEMBERS OF COWORKING SPACES, NOT OF THE COWORKING SPACES THEMSELVES. THERE ARE MORE MEMBERS THAN COWORKING SPACES & THEY ARE NOT NECESSARILY EQUALLY DISTRIBUTED SINCE THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS VARIES PER SPACE. WORKSTATIONS
  • 17. 17 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY GENERAL 2017 RESULT STATUS QUO PREFERENCE BY GENDER OF MEMBERS 2017 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 3% 3%1% 36%42%14% A BASIC CHAIR (E.G. WOODEN OR PLASTIC) A SIMPLE OFFICE CHAIR AN ERGONOMIC OFFICE CHAIR A STABILITY BALL OR BALL CHAIR A STANDING DESK OTHER & N.A. 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 4% 8%3%70%13%4% FEMALE MALE 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 1% 1% 3% 4% 2% 1% 39% 33% 40% 49% 16% 12% 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 3% 1% 6% 10% 3% 3% 67% 74% 19% 7% 2% 5% BY MEMBER AGE GROUPS 18 - 34 35 - 49 50 + 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 6% 1% 3% 6% 2% 2% 2% 34% 39% 33% 50% 39% 48% 6% 14% 15% 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 4% 3% 1% 11% 12% 5% 1% 6% 68% 70% 70% 14% 11% 15% 4% 2% 5% YEARSOLD CURRENT CHAIR TYPES OF MEMBERS & PREFERRED CHAIR TYPES
  • 18. 18 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY VIEW PREFERENCES 2017 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 1%25%70%3% A WALL A WINDOW (WITH A VIEW TO THE SURROUNDING AREAS) PEOPLE AROUND THEM N.A. BY GENDER OF MEMBERS GENERAL 2017 RESULT 18 - 34 35 - 49 50 + 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 30% 29% 23% 65% 64% 78% 4% 8% 0% BY MEMBER AGE GROUPS FEMALE MALE 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 21% 31% 76% 66% 3% 3% YEARSOLD
  • 19. 19 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY LAYOUT PREFERENCES 2017 2016 2014 2012 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 2% 2% 3% 2% 6% 3% 7% 4%9% 40% 57% 48% 41% 35% 26% 25% 27% 17% 12% 17% 17% OPEN WORKSPACES WITH TRANSPARENT ROOMS OPEN WORKSPACES WITH PRIVATE AREAS A MIX OF OPEN & CLOSED ROOMS PRIVATE WORKSPACES WITH OPEN AREAS* I DON'T MIND OTHER & N.A. GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS *PLEASE NOTE: THE OPTIONAL ANSWER "PRIVATE WORKSPACES WITH OPEN AREAS" WAS NOT PART OF THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY BEFORE 2017
  • 20. 20 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS 1000 % 2000 % 3000 % 4000 % WHAT MEMBERS LIKE ABOUT THEIR COWORKING SPACES THE MOST THE LOCATION THE MEMBERS* THE MANAGERS/HOSTS** THE INTERIOUR DESIGN THE EVENTS THE INTERNET CONNECTION*** THE PRICE**** OTHER 2000 % 4000 % 6000 % 8000 % 6% 31% 43% 53% 80% 61% 5% 33% 31% 40% 50% 72% 58% 7% 33% 31% 35% 48% 63% 69% 75% 10% 30% 31% 31% 42% 52% 63% 70% 2017 2016 2014 2012 *2014 & BEFORE: "THE PEOPLE IN MY COWORKING SPACE" ** 2014 & BEFORE: "THE COWORKING SPACE OPERATORS" *** WAS NOT PART OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE BEFORE 2016 **** 2012: WAS NOT ASKED IN A COMPARABLE WAY OTHER: .E.G.COMMUNITY (=MEMBERS); FLEXIBILITY, NETWORKING, BIG WINDOWS, THE VIEW, NATURAL LIGHT, FACILITIES, THE OPPORTUNITIES, THE VIBE, THE COFFEE, FREE PARKING MULTIPLE RESPONSES ALLOWED
  • 21. 21 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY WHAT MEMBERS DON'T LIKE ABOUT THEIR COWORKING SPACES GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS NOISE LACK OF INTERACTION* LACK OF PRIVACY BAD INTERNET CONNECTION* NOT ABLE TO FOCUS INCOMPLETE INFRASTRUCTURE CLEANINESS PRICES ARE TOO HIGH COWORKING SPACE IN A BAD SHAPE* PEOPLE IN MY COWORKING SPACE OTHER** 825 % 1650 % 2475 % 3300 % 23% 5% 10% 5% 13% 10% 17% 21% 15% 4% 4% 5% 7% 9% 17% 30% 15% 14% 24% 15% 4% 5% 8% 11% 12% 15% 19% 19% 20% 25% *THOSE RESPONSE OPTIONS HAVE NOT BEEN AVAILABLE IN 2014 YET. **OTHER (2017): .E.G. CLIMATE CONDITIONS, INTERIOR DESIGN, LACK OF KITCHEN FACILITIES, LACK OF (FREE) PARKING, LACK OF NATURAL LIGHT, LACK OF CELL PHONE RECEPTION, CONSTANT CHANGES. MULTIPLE RESPONSES ALLOWED
  • 22. 22 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY 2017 2016 2014 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 0% 1% 1% 18% 18% 24% 13% 15% 14% 70% 66% 62% YES YES, BUT ALSO WORKED FROM OTHERS NO DON'T KNOW & N.A. 2017 2016 2014 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 4% 5% 11% 3% 3% 5% 6% 9% 8% 15% 17% 13% 72% 67% 64% 1 2 3 4 5+ COWORKING SPACES PLEASE NOTE: THE SECOND QUESTION DIDN'T OFFER A "DON'T KNOW" OPTION FOR TECHNICAL REASONS: HENCE, THE SLIGHT DIFFERENCES TO THE FIRST QUESTION MAY BE EXPLAINED BY RESPONDENTS WHO DIDN'T RESPOND TO THIS QUESTION. 'N.A.' ALSO COULDN'T BE CONSIDERED FOR THE SAME REASON. MEAN MEDIAN 5% TRIMMED MEAN 2.5 11.8 1.8 11.5 1.9 11.4 MEMBER COWORKING HISTORY GENERAL RESULTS BY YEARS - DO YOU STILL WORK FROM YOUR FIRST COWORKING SPACE? GENERAL RESULTS BY YEARS - IN HOW MANY COWORKING SPACES HAVE YOU ALREADY WORKED?
  • 23. 23 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY 1000 % 2000 % 3000 % 4000 % 2017 2016 2014 0 % 2.500 % 5.000 % 7.500 % 10.000 % 3% 5% 8% 3% 8% 6% 11% 12% 9% 20% 17% 22% 24% 18% 16% 16% 13% 14% 24% 26% 26% ≤ 3 4 - 6 7 - 12 13 - 24 25 - 36 37 - 48 > 48 MONTHS MEAN MEDIAN 5% TRIMMED MEAN 17.6 1014.6 13.5 912.0 17,7 9.514.7 LENGTH OF CURRENT MEMBERSHIP IN MONTHS GENERAL RESULTS THROUGHOUT THE YEARS
  • 24. 24 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY MEMBERSHIP FEE PAYER 3% 4% 6%1% 26% 44% 15% MEMBER (PERSONAL EXPENSE) MEMBER (BUSINESS EXPENSE) EMPLOYER CLIENT PAID WITH OTHER CAPITAL TYPE IT'S FREE OTHER & N.A. BY GENDER OF MEMBERS2017 RESULT FEMALE MALE 1% 4% 3% 4% 5% 9% 1% 1% 23% 29% 51% 38% 17%15% 18-34 35-49 50 + 3%2%3% 3%2% 6% 13% 5% 8% 1% 2% 13% 18% 36% 53%57% 32% 16%16%15% BY MEMBER AGE GROUPS YEARS OLD
  • 25. 25 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY REGULARITY OF MEMBERSHIP PAYMENT GENERAL 2017 RESULT 0% 0%13% 11% 9% 83% 73% 2% 2% 3% 3% 1% 0% HOURLY DAILY WEEKLY MONTHLY OTHER** DON'T KNOW* N.A. GENERAL 2017 RESULT - WITHOUT ‚DON'T KNOW‘ RESPONSES 3% 3% *PLEASE NOTE: THE HIGH SHARE OF MEMBERS, WHO DON'T KNOW HOW OFTEN THEIR MEMBERSHIP IS RENEWED, IS MAINLY A RESULT OF THE HIGH SHARE OF EMPLOYERS WHO FUND MEMBERSHIPS FOR THEIR EMPLOYEES. FOR THIS REASON, THE SECOND BAR PRESENTS THE GENERAL RESULTS WITHOUT THE "DON'T KNOW" OPTION. **'OTHER' INCLUDES MEMBERSHIPS THAT ARE PAID ANNUALLY, EVERY SIX MONTHS, QUARTERLY AND BI-WEEKLY. IT ALSO INCLUDES LIMITED NO. OF DAY PASSES (E.G. 10-DAYS-PASSES), AND PAY-AS-YOU-WORK MEMBERSHIPS. THE 'OTHER' OPTION OFFERED OPEN RESPONSES. THOSE RESPONSES WILL BE CONSIDERED IN THE 2018 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY.
  • 26. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SUPPORT THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY AND RECEIVE MORE STATISTICS & CHARTS REPRESENTING THE MEMBER OF COWORKING SPACES? YES, GIMME MORE STATS! ABOUT THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY NO COPIES ALLOWED. NOT FOR RESALE.© DESKMAG - CARSTEN FOERTSCH - CARSTEN @ DESKMAG.COM PARTICIPANTS: 2011-12: 913, 2012-13: 1206, 2013-14: 1270, 2015-16: 1679, 2016-17: 1876 IN ORDER TO SIMPLIFY THE PRESENTATION, 2016-17 RESULTS ARE REFERRED TO BY THE YEAR 2017, WHILST 2015-16 RESULTS ARE REFERRED TO BY THE YEAR 2016 AND SO ON. THIS IS BECAUSE THE SURVEY HAS ALWAYS BEEN CONDUCTED AT THE END OF EACH YEAR. FINAL RESULTS ARE ANALYZED USING A COMPLEX STATISTICAL TOOL, AND ARE CHECKED USING QUALITY STANDARDS. IT IS FOR THIS REASON THAT THE FIRST AND FINAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER SLIGHTLY. FINAL RESULTS ARE ALSO GROUPED BY DEMOGRAPHIC CATEGORIES & OTHER CRITERIA USING A BI- OR MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS. READ THE RELATED ARTICLE AT BIT.LY/ALLABOUTMEMBERS INTERESTED IN REGULAR UPDATES RELATING TO THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY? JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER! ANY QUESTION? DROP A LINE TO SURVEY @ DESKMAG.COM
  • 27. "Social Workplaces are the physical nodes where the new generation of knowledgable connected workers find meaning in work, well-being and are amplified in terms of business operations and goals. SocialWorkplaces.com’s #1 mission is to connect these rising workplace communities. The company organizes the Coworking Europe conference: the first international conference of its kind, where approximately 500 coworking stakeholders from more than 40 countries gather each year. In 2015, the company launched the Coworking Africa conference and, more recently, introduced Coworking India, Coworking Middle East as well as the premium event “The Social Workplace Conference.” SocialWorkplaces.com "Social Workplaces are the physical nodes where the new generation of knowledgable connected workers find meaning in work, well-being and are amplified in terms of business operations and goals. SocialWorkplaces.com’s #1 mission is to connect these rising workplace communities. The company organizes the Coworking Europe conference: the first international conference of its kind, where approximately 500 coworking stakeholders from more than 40 countries gather each year. In 2015, the company launched the Coworking Africa conference and, more recently, introduced Coworking India, Coworking Middle East as well as the premium event “The Social Workplace Conference.” SocialWorkplaces.com 27 COLLABORATION PARTNER OF THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY27
  • 28. "Nexudus is a leading white-label platform to help coworking space operators with their day-to-day tasks. Today, hundreds of spaces around the world use Nexudus to spend less time typing and chasing invoices, keeping their communities engaged and up- to-date, or controlling who is in and out of the space and how it is used. Nexudus is made for and by their active community of users." nexudus.com essensys.tech communitas.network "Occupie, the essensys platform, is a simple, easy to use software platform that helps you manage your workspace from lead to cash and everything in between. Workspaces can attract and retain customers, grow additional income streams and gain business insight to make quicker decisions. We focus on ensuring that your workspace can deliver the best customer experience.” "Communitas believes in the power of community and the future of work. Through a marketing agency, benefits network, real estate advisory services and world-class publications, we help our clients better serve their stakeholders. Whether you are a builder of community or real estate, Communitas is here for you.” THE ‘MAIN SUPPORTERS’ PROVIDED FINANCIAL RESOURCES TO SUPPORT THE INDEPENDENT RESEARCH, AND WERE OFFICIAL PROMOTERS, OF THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY. 28 MAIN SUPPORTERS OF THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY28
  • 29. WESERLAND OFFICIAL SUPPORTERS OF THE GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY 29 THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY
  • 30. (ARITHMETIC) MEAN, 5% TRIMMED MEAN, MEDIAN… WHY ARE THERE SO MANY DIFFERENT AVERAGE VALUES? ISN’T THERE A SIMPLER WAY? SURE THERE IS! BUT REDUCING A SKEWED DEVELOPMENT TO A SINGLE VALUE WOULD NOT PROVIDE AN ACCURATE REFLECTION OF THE COWORKING LANDSCAPE, WHICH HAS BECOME MORE DIVERSE OVER RECENT YEARS. IN FACT, THE VALUES PRESENTED HEREIN ARE THREE OF DOZENS OF STATISTICAL MEASURES; SO, WE ARE STILL KEEPING IT QUITE SIMPLE. THE (ARITHMETIC) MEAN IS THE MOST COMMON AVERAGE TO REPORT CENTRAL TENDENCIES; HOWEVER, IT IS NOT ROBUST IF IT IS INFLUENCED BY OUTLIERS (EXTREME CASES, WHICH ARE MUCH LARGER OR SMALLER THAN MOST OF THE OTHERS). FOR EXAMPLE, THINK OF AN UNEQUAL DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME, WHERE 10% OF PEOPLE IN YOUR COUNTRY “EARN” 90% OF ALL INCOME. IF YOU TOOK THE MEAN OF THAT INCOME, THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE WOULD SEE A HUGE GAP BETWEEN THE MEAN VALUE AND THE AMOUNT IN THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS. HENCE, IT WOULD NOT REFLECT THEIR REALITY. THE COWORKING MARKET IS, OF COURSE, NOT THAT UNEQUAL; HOWEVER, THERE ARE COWORKING SPACES (CHAINS) THAT CAN BE IDENTIFIED AS OUTLIERS, AND ARE MUCH BIGGER THAN MOST OTHER COWORKING SPACES. FOR THIS REASON, WE PROVIDED TWO MORE AVERAGE VALUES: THE 5% TRIMMED MEAN CUTS THE HIGHEST AND LOWEST 5% OF CASES, AND REFLECTS THE AVERAGE REALITY MUCH BETTER THAN THE ARITHMETIC MEAN; THE MEDIAN SEPARATES THE UPPER HALF FROM THE LOWER HALF (IT IS SIMPLY THE VALUE IN THE MIDDLE). IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT MOST OF STATISTICS PRESENTED HEREIN ARE GROUPED, AND PRESENT THEIR SHARE TO REFLECT THE WHOLE REALITY. THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY PAGE 30 HOW TO READ THE STATISTICS?
  • 31. HOW ARE THE (ARITHMETIC) MEAN, 5% TRIMMED MEAN, AND MEDIAN CALCULATED? THE (ARITHMETIC) MEAN IS THE SUM OF A COLLECTION OF NUMBERS DIVIDED BY THE NUMBER OF VALUES IN THE COLLECTION. CONFUSED? IMAGINE YOU HAVE TEN NUMBERS… NOW ADD THEM UP, AND THEN DIVIDE BY TEN: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 4 + 5 + 5 + 6 + 9 + 19 = 58/10 = 5.8 THE 5% TRIMMED MEAN FIRST REMOVES THE HIGHEST AND LOWEST 5% OF A COLLECTION OF NUMBERS, SUMS THE REST, AND DIVIDES THIS TOTAL BY THE NUMBER OF VALUES IN THE COLLECTION: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 4 + 5 + 5 + 6 + 9 + 19 = 38/8 = 4.75 = 4.8 (ROUNDED) THE MEDIAN IS THE MIDDLE NUMBER OF A COLLECTION OF VALUES. IT DIVIDES THE UPPER HALF BY THE LOWER HALF. IN THIS CASE, WE HAVE AN EVEN NUMBER OF VALUES (TWO MIDDLE NUMBERS), WHICH ARE SUMED AND THEN DIVIDED. THIS GIVES A FULLY TRUNCATED OR TRIMMED MEAN: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 4 + 5 + 5 + 6 + 9 + 19 = (4 + 5)/2 = 4.5 SIDE NOTE: THE GREATER THE DIFFERENCE AMONG THE VALUES, THE GREATER THE COLLECTION OF UNEQUALLY DISTRIBUTED VALUES. IF YOU’D LIKE TO CONSIDER ONLY A SINGLE NUMBER, GO WITH THE 5% TRIMMED MEAN. HOWEVER, IT'S BETTER TO USE THE SHARE OF GROUPS PRESENTED IN THE CHARTS. HOW TO READ THE STATISTICS? THE 2017 GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY PAGE 31