USF.VaccineLink.FPHA.poster.final.8.18.15
•
0 likes•110 views
This document describes a study that used a community-based participatory research approach and mobile tablet technology to assess and address barriers to adult vaccinations in Florida. Field health navigators conducted pre- and post-intervention surveys using a 5A's educational intervention model (Awareness, Additives, Autism Myth, Assist Others, Accessibility). Results showed that the bilingual intervention improved perceptions of vaccine safety and efficacy among the 224 adult participants. The study demonstrates that community-based education and mobile technologies can effectively reduce barriers to vaccination.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
African american women and colorectal cancer research: Why Your Participation...
An overview of how research questions are generated, how research is conducted, and disseminated to benefit the creation of interventions to reduce colorectal cancer among African American women.
Social Media in Public Health: National Immunization Conference 2013
The National Immunisation Conference was held in Manchester on 5th December 2013 and featured a range of topics on public health and immunization.
International Vaccines Summit 2021: The Language of Vaccine Confidence - Less...
Presentation to the International Vaccines Summit on September 22, 2021, reviewing communication best practices, polling findings, and lessons learned from the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine in the United States.
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Acceptability in Multiethnic Communities: Impl...
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Acceptability in Multiethnic Communities: Impl...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Acceptability in Multiethnic Communities: Implications for Public Health Policy, Messaging, and Community OutreachVaccines: Linking Awareness, Access, and Action
This presentation was delivered at the PEPP (DTC Perspective’s “Patient Engagement through Physicians and Pharmacists” event).
The presentation dicusses the current landscape and the tactics and strategies currently being undertaken in this critical public health area. It also shares insights from pharmacy programs in the Tdap, flu, and shingles categories.
Recommended
African american women and colorectal cancer research: Why Your Participation...
An overview of how research questions are generated, how research is conducted, and disseminated to benefit the creation of interventions to reduce colorectal cancer among African American women.
Social Media in Public Health: National Immunization Conference 2013
The National Immunisation Conference was held in Manchester on 5th December 2013 and featured a range of topics on public health and immunization.
International Vaccines Summit 2021: The Language of Vaccine Confidence - Less...
Presentation to the International Vaccines Summit on September 22, 2021, reviewing communication best practices, polling findings, and lessons learned from the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine in the United States.
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Acceptability in Multiethnic Communities: Impl...
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Acceptability in Multiethnic Communities: Impl...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Acceptability in Multiethnic Communities: Implications for Public Health Policy, Messaging, and Community OutreachVaccines: Linking Awareness, Access, and Action
This presentation was delivered at the PEPP (DTC Perspective’s “Patient Engagement through Physicians and Pharmacists” event).
The presentation dicusses the current landscape and the tactics and strategies currently being undertaken in this critical public health area. It also shares insights from pharmacy programs in the Tdap, flu, and shingles categories.
Morning Consult Poll: COVID-19, Vaccine Mandates, and FDA Approval
National poll of 2,500 adults, including 956 unvaccinated adults, conducted by Morning Consult Aug. 19-22 on behalf of the de Beaumont Foundation. See insights on beliefs, values, and perspectives, including what may persuade people to get vaccinated.
Updates from CDC and the Ad Council
In this webinar, Dr. Anne Schuchat, principal deputy director of the CDC, and Charysse Nunez, insights lead for the Ad Council’s COVID Campaign, provided updates on the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccinations, and communications efforts. This webinar was put on by the Public Health Communications Collaborative.
Poll: The Language of Vaccine Acceptance
Insights on Americans' perspectives on the COVID-19 vaccines, with effective language to build confidence in vaccination. Based on a poll conducted Dec. 21-22, 2020, by Frank Luntz and the de Beaumont Foundation in partnership with the American Public Health Association, the National Collaborative for Health Equity, and Resolve to Save Lives, an Initiative of Vital Strategies.
Many older adults aren't prepared for emergency situations
A survey of more than 2,200 adults over the age of 50 finds that more than 20% of them had experienced an emergency — a weather event or power outage — in the past year, but many were not necessarily prepared. Here’s more:
•Medical supplies: Among those who take medications, some 18% didn’t have a week’s supply of essential drugs handy. Among those who relied on electricity for medical equipment, a quarter said they had alternate ways of generating power.
•Shelter and mobility: The majority said they’d have transportation to leave their home in case of an emergency, but a quarter said they’d have trouble finding another place to stay.
•Other supplies: A little over half said they have a seven-day supply of food and water. Fewer than a third have a fully stocked emergency kit.
Webinar: How to Answer Parents' Questions on COVID-19 Vaccinations and Children
Webinar: How to Answer Parents' Questions on COVID-19 Vaccinations and Childrende Beaumont Foundation
This webinar focused on COVID-19 communications to answer parents’ questions about COVID-19 vaccination for children. Webinar: Vaccine Distribution & Misinformation, 1-12-2021
Sponsored by the Public Health Communications Collaborative, this webinar features Dr. Nadine Gracia of Trust for America's Health and Dr. Joe Smyser of the Public Good Projects.
Webinar: Successful COVID-19 Messaging in Rural Communities
In this webinar, Dr. Brian C. Castrucci President and Chief Executive Officer of the de Beaumont Foundation, presented new polling about vaccine confidence and Dr. Ayne Amjad, Commissioner and State Health Officer for West Virginia, and Dr. Costello, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics at West Virginia University School of Medicine, presented insights from their research and successful vaccine outreach campaign to rural communities in West Virginia. Dr. Lauren Smith, Chief Health Equity and Strategy Officer for CDC Foundation, moderated the conversation and an audience Q&A with Drs. Amjad and Costello.
Social media in health--what are the safety concerns for health consumers?
Social media in health--what are the safety concerns for health consumers? by Lau AY, Gabarron E, Fernandez-Luque L, Armayones M. HIM J. 2012;41(2):30-5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23705132
Abstract: Recent literature has discussed the unintended consequences of clinical information technologies (IT) on patient safety, yet there has been little discussion about the safety concerns in the area of consumer health IT. This paper
presents a range of safety concerns for consumers in social media, with a case study on YouTube. We conducted a scan of abstracts on ‘quality criteria’ related to YouTube. Five areas regarding the safety of YouTube for consumers were identified: (a) harmful health material targeted at consumers (such as inappropriate marketing of tobacco or direct-to-consumer drug advertising); (b) public display of unhealthy behaviour (such as people displaying self-injury behaviours or hurting others); (c) tainted public health messages (i.e. the rise of negative voices against public health messages); (d) psychological impact from accessing inappropriate, offensive or biased social media content; and (e) using social media to distort policy and research funding agendas. The examples presented should contribute to a better understanding about how to promote a safe consumption and production of social
media for consumers, and an evidence-based approach to designing social media interventions for health. The
potential harm associated with the use of unsafe social media content on the Internet is a major concern. More empirical and theoretical studies are needed to examine how social media influences consumer health decisions, behaviours and outcomes, and devise ways to deter the dissemination of harmful influences in social media.
National Immunization Conference 2013
What can social media offer public health? A presentation to the National Immunisation Conference 2013.
Running Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docx
Running Head: SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
3
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Summary of teaching plan
Title: Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Overview
Sexually Transmitted Diseases are diseases that are transmitted from one person to another during oral, anal and vaginal sexual activities. STDs are very common especially among sexually active teenagers and a number of them don’t have the symptoms making it hard to tell if one has contacted one. STDs are very dangerous to one’s health however, it can be detected when one is tested and majority of them have a cure (Bouchery, Harwood, and Brewer, 2014). STDs are preventable with abstinence and safe sexual practices; one is likely not to contract the disease. Examples of the STDs are: chlamydia, genital warts, gonorrhea, hepatitis B, herpes, HIV and AIDS, Human Papillomavirus, scabies, syphilis and trichomoniais (Stingler, Neusel, and Perry, 2013).
Objectives
1. To help the teenagers understand what STDs are as well as ways one can contract them
2. To teach the teenagers some of the preventive measures of contracting STDs.
3. To educate the teenagers on measures on should take incase exposed to an environment one is likely to contract STDs
4. To help the teenagers differentiate the myths from the facts regarding STDs
Materials
Video clips featuring adults and teenage experts, Graphic power point presentations
STD pamphlets, Writing materials: Pens and Plain papers, Teacher’s laptop, overhead screen
Estimated cost: Overhead screen will be offered by the church, additional materials needed about $45-$80
Directions
The learning sessions was grouped into four different sessions lasting approximately 30 to 45 minutes. In the first session, it was purely teaching session where I addressed all the objectives in a classroom setting and the teenagers were allowed to take notes. Teaching was enhanced with graphic power points to help create a visual understanding of the different concepts put across. The second session on the other hand was purely audio visual where the teenagers were allowed to view different Video clips featuring adults and teenage experts expounding on sexually, transmitted disease. The audio-visual session also addressed all the objectives just as the case was in the classroom set up in session one.
The third session was an open forum where the teenagers were allowed to ask questions, seek clarification on different issues or add more insight on concept learned. This session was an interactive one where all disturbing questions was addressed. The end of this session was marked by satisfactory response to all questions and insight brought forward by both the teacher and the teenagers.
The fourth and final session was an examination setup where each of the participants were given a quick test to test their understanding for the concepts learnt. Those who performed exemplary were awarded certificates and gifts and the whole were issued pa.
Running Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docx
Running Head: SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
3
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Summary of teaching plan
Title: Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Overview
Sexually Transmitted Diseases are diseases that are transmitted from one person to another during oral, anal and vaginal sexual activities. STDs are very common especially among sexually active teenagers and a number of them don’t have the symptoms making it hard to tell if one has contacted one. STDs are very dangerous to one’s health however, it can be detected when one is tested and majority of them have a cure (Bouchery, Harwood, and Brewer, 2014). STDs are preventable with abstinence and safe sexual practices; one is likely not to contract the disease. Examples of the STDs are: chlamydia, genital warts, gonorrhea, hepatitis B, herpes, HIV and AIDS, Human Papillomavirus, scabies, syphilis and trichomoniais (Stingler, Neusel, and Perry, 2013).
Objectives
1. To help the teenagers understand what STDs are as well as ways one can contract them
2. To teach the teenagers some of the preventive measures of contracting STDs.
3. To educate the teenagers on measures on should take incase exposed to an environment one is likely to contract STDs
4. To help the teenagers differentiate the myths from the facts regarding STDs
Materials
Video clips featuring adults and teenage experts, Graphic power point presentations
STD pamphlets, Writing materials: Pens and Plain papers, Teacher’s laptop, overhead screen
Estimated cost: Overhead screen will be offered by the church, additional materials needed about $45-$80
Directions
The learning sessions was grouped into four different sessions lasting approximately 30 to 45 minutes. In the first session, it was purely teaching session where I addressed all the objectives in a classroom setting and the teenagers were allowed to take notes. Teaching was enhanced with graphic power points to help create a visual understanding of the different concepts put across. The second session on the other hand was purely audio visual where the teenagers were allowed to view different Video clips featuring adults and teenage experts expounding on sexually, transmitted disease. The audio-visual session also addressed all the objectives just as the case was in the classroom set up in session one.
The third session was an open forum where the teenagers were allowed to ask questions, seek clarification on different issues or add more insight on concept learned. This session was an interactive one where all disturbing questions was addressed. The end of this session was marked by satisfactory response to all questions and insight brought forward by both the teacher and the teenagers.
The fourth and final session was an examination setup where each of the participants were given a quick test to test their understanding for the concepts learnt. Those who performed exemplary were awarded certificates and gifts and the whole were issued pa ...
1. Are there relationships between personal (hygiene, eating habits.docx
1. Are there relationships between personal (hygiene, eating habits, wearing of masks) social (public gatherings, proximity to one another) demographic (age, gender, education, racial ethnicity), and economic (occupation, level of education, annual income, home environment) factors and the spread, severity, and mortality rates of COVID patients worldwide?
2. Is there a difference in behaviour changes in people who have undergone cognitive behaviour therapy versus those who undergo pharmacologic intervention alone?
3. What is the difference in infection rates, pain intensity, inflammation, and restoration of functionality in people who have received prophylactic antibiotics and those who do not receive the prophylactic antibiotics during endodontic surgery?
4. What are nurses' perceptions towards patients who are non-adherent to the prescribed medications and are always complaining of deteriorating health?
Question one
: dependent and independent variables.
The dependent variables in the first question are hygiene eating habits, wearing masks, public gatherings, proximity to one another, occupation, level of education, annual income and home environment (variables), COVID patients (Population) and spread, severity, and mortality rates. (testability). The independent variables include age, gender, and race.
Why question 1?
The end of 2019 set the beginning of what would become a life-changing experience for virtually everyone worldwide in the following one year. When COVID-19 first struck in Wuhan China, nobody speculated that the disease would later spread across the globe, killing millions of people and negatively impacting the livelihood of the affected. Other than the deaths that the disease has brought upon innocent people, their governments across the nations have implemented stringent policies to help curb the spread, such as national lockdowns, closure of schools and other institutions, curfews, and other strict rules, all intended to prevent the infection rates. These government intervention measures had a huge economic, social, and personal impact on people and led to other problems, including but not limited to mental health.
Surprisingly, the disease was affecting different nations on varying intensities. For example, back in March 2020 COVID deaths in Italy were ranging above 700 on a daily basis while during the same time, there were very few cases and deaths in Africa (Di Lorenzo & Di Trolio, 2020; Onder et al., 2020). There were speculations that upon reaching Africa, COVID would lead to very high infection and mortality rates due to the poor healthcare systems and the relatively low economic status of most African countries. However, this turned out to be wrong as to date, the developed countries such as the USA, UK, and other European countries have the largest numbers of COVID cases and deaths (Bamgboye et al., 2020).
The relatively low numbers of new cases and deaths in Africa is intriguing. This calls for res.
Running head PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 1 .docx
Running head: PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 1
Perceived Benefits and Barriers about the MMR Vaccine among the Parents of a Pediatric
Population in South Florida
Florida International University
PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 2
Background
According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), about 1 in 4 people
in the United States will be hospitalized and one out of every 1,000 people with measles will
develop brain swelling that could lead to brain damage. Given the possible severity when
obtaining Measles, the CDC recommends to protect children against measles by obtaining a
vaccine that provides enduring insurance against all strains of measles (Measles, 2018). The
Measles, Mumps, and Rubella vaccine (MMR) is administered in two doses in order to prevent
an individual from obtaining one of those diseases. The first dose was given to children when
they are about 13 months old, which offers 90 to 95% protection against those diseases. The
second dose increases those protection odds to become 99%, which is administered before a
child turns five years old. In order for the vaccine to be immune in our system, we need to
achieve at least 95% of immunity to those diseases (Gardner, 2010).
Side effects of MMR vaccine
There is for all intents and purposes no medication without reactions. Gentle symptoms of MMR
vaccine include the following: fever, mild rash, and swelling of the glands in the cheeks or neck.
Moderate reactions include: febrile seizures, brief joint inflammation, and impermanent
thrombocytopenia. Serious side effects of MMR vaccine are amazingly uncommon, but can
include serious allergic responses. Other serious side effects are rare to the point that it is
difficult to recognize whether they are caused by the vaccine, which includes: deafness, long-
term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness, and lasting brain damage (Mahmić-Kaknjo, 2017).
PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 3
Barriers
Obtaining immunization has been viewed as one of the best general wellbeing accomplishments
of the twentieth century for their job in killing smallpox and controlling polio, measles, rubella,
and different irresistible ailments in the United States. Regardless of their adequacy in
forestalling and destroying illness, routine youth vaccine take-up remains problematic. Parent
refusal of immunizations has added to flare-ups of vaccine preventable infections, for example,
measles and pertussis (Maglione, 2014). Late episodes of measles in the United Kingdom and
United States have awoken reestablished worry about vaccination dismissal. The rate of
vaccination take-up has fallen. Individuals' view of vaccine protection and effectiveness has
appeared to be an imperative factor for immunization take-up that, in the meantime, can spread
between people (Medus, 2014).
Research has shown that guardians' frames of mind .
More Related Content
What's hot
Morning Consult Poll: COVID-19, Vaccine Mandates, and FDA Approval
National poll of 2,500 adults, including 956 unvaccinated adults, conducted by Morning Consult Aug. 19-22 on behalf of the de Beaumont Foundation. See insights on beliefs, values, and perspectives, including what may persuade people to get vaccinated.
Updates from CDC and the Ad Council
In this webinar, Dr. Anne Schuchat, principal deputy director of the CDC, and Charysse Nunez, insights lead for the Ad Council’s COVID Campaign, provided updates on the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccinations, and communications efforts. This webinar was put on by the Public Health Communications Collaborative.
Poll: The Language of Vaccine Acceptance
Insights on Americans' perspectives on the COVID-19 vaccines, with effective language to build confidence in vaccination. Based on a poll conducted Dec. 21-22, 2020, by Frank Luntz and the de Beaumont Foundation in partnership with the American Public Health Association, the National Collaborative for Health Equity, and Resolve to Save Lives, an Initiative of Vital Strategies.
Many older adults aren't prepared for emergency situations
A survey of more than 2,200 adults over the age of 50 finds that more than 20% of them had experienced an emergency — a weather event or power outage — in the past year, but many were not necessarily prepared. Here’s more:
•Medical supplies: Among those who take medications, some 18% didn’t have a week’s supply of essential drugs handy. Among those who relied on electricity for medical equipment, a quarter said they had alternate ways of generating power.
•Shelter and mobility: The majority said they’d have transportation to leave their home in case of an emergency, but a quarter said they’d have trouble finding another place to stay.
•Other supplies: A little over half said they have a seven-day supply of food and water. Fewer than a third have a fully stocked emergency kit.
Webinar: How to Answer Parents' Questions on COVID-19 Vaccinations and Children
Webinar: How to Answer Parents' Questions on COVID-19 Vaccinations and Childrende Beaumont Foundation
This webinar focused on COVID-19 communications to answer parents’ questions about COVID-19 vaccination for children. Webinar: Vaccine Distribution & Misinformation, 1-12-2021
Sponsored by the Public Health Communications Collaborative, this webinar features Dr. Nadine Gracia of Trust for America's Health and Dr. Joe Smyser of the Public Good Projects.
Webinar: Successful COVID-19 Messaging in Rural Communities
In this webinar, Dr. Brian C. Castrucci President and Chief Executive Officer of the de Beaumont Foundation, presented new polling about vaccine confidence and Dr. Ayne Amjad, Commissioner and State Health Officer for West Virginia, and Dr. Costello, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics at West Virginia University School of Medicine, presented insights from their research and successful vaccine outreach campaign to rural communities in West Virginia. Dr. Lauren Smith, Chief Health Equity and Strategy Officer for CDC Foundation, moderated the conversation and an audience Q&A with Drs. Amjad and Costello.
What's hot (8)
Morning Consult Poll: COVID-19, Vaccine Mandates, and FDA Approval
Morning Consult Poll: COVID-19, Vaccine Mandates, and FDA Approval
Many older adults aren't prepared for emergency situations
Many older adults aren't prepared for emergency situations
Webinar: How to Answer Parents' Questions on COVID-19 Vaccinations and Children
Webinar: How to Answer Parents' Questions on COVID-19 Vaccinations and Children
Improving Health Literacy: Challenges for Health Professionals
Improving Health Literacy: Challenges for Health Professionals
Webinar: Vaccine Distribution & Misinformation, 1-12-2021
Webinar: Vaccine Distribution & Misinformation, 1-12-2021
Webinar: Successful COVID-19 Messaging in Rural Communities
Webinar: Successful COVID-19 Messaging in Rural Communities
Similar to USF.VaccineLink.FPHA.poster.final.8.18.15
Social media in health--what are the safety concerns for health consumers?
Social media in health--what are the safety concerns for health consumers? by Lau AY, Gabarron E, Fernandez-Luque L, Armayones M. HIM J. 2012;41(2):30-5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23705132
Abstract: Recent literature has discussed the unintended consequences of clinical information technologies (IT) on patient safety, yet there has been little discussion about the safety concerns in the area of consumer health IT. This paper
presents a range of safety concerns for consumers in social media, with a case study on YouTube. We conducted a scan of abstracts on ‘quality criteria’ related to YouTube. Five areas regarding the safety of YouTube for consumers were identified: (a) harmful health material targeted at consumers (such as inappropriate marketing of tobacco or direct-to-consumer drug advertising); (b) public display of unhealthy behaviour (such as people displaying self-injury behaviours or hurting others); (c) tainted public health messages (i.e. the rise of negative voices against public health messages); (d) psychological impact from accessing inappropriate, offensive or biased social media content; and (e) using social media to distort policy and research funding agendas. The examples presented should contribute to a better understanding about how to promote a safe consumption and production of social
media for consumers, and an evidence-based approach to designing social media interventions for health. The
potential harm associated with the use of unsafe social media content on the Internet is a major concern. More empirical and theoretical studies are needed to examine how social media influences consumer health decisions, behaviours and outcomes, and devise ways to deter the dissemination of harmful influences in social media.
National Immunization Conference 2013
What can social media offer public health? A presentation to the National Immunisation Conference 2013.
Running Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docx
Running Head: SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
3
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Summary of teaching plan
Title: Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Overview
Sexually Transmitted Diseases are diseases that are transmitted from one person to another during oral, anal and vaginal sexual activities. STDs are very common especially among sexually active teenagers and a number of them don’t have the symptoms making it hard to tell if one has contacted one. STDs are very dangerous to one’s health however, it can be detected when one is tested and majority of them have a cure (Bouchery, Harwood, and Brewer, 2014). STDs are preventable with abstinence and safe sexual practices; one is likely not to contract the disease. Examples of the STDs are: chlamydia, genital warts, gonorrhea, hepatitis B, herpes, HIV and AIDS, Human Papillomavirus, scabies, syphilis and trichomoniais (Stingler, Neusel, and Perry, 2013).
Objectives
1. To help the teenagers understand what STDs are as well as ways one can contract them
2. To teach the teenagers some of the preventive measures of contracting STDs.
3. To educate the teenagers on measures on should take incase exposed to an environment one is likely to contract STDs
4. To help the teenagers differentiate the myths from the facts regarding STDs
Materials
Video clips featuring adults and teenage experts, Graphic power point presentations
STD pamphlets, Writing materials: Pens and Plain papers, Teacher’s laptop, overhead screen
Estimated cost: Overhead screen will be offered by the church, additional materials needed about $45-$80
Directions
The learning sessions was grouped into four different sessions lasting approximately 30 to 45 minutes. In the first session, it was purely teaching session where I addressed all the objectives in a classroom setting and the teenagers were allowed to take notes. Teaching was enhanced with graphic power points to help create a visual understanding of the different concepts put across. The second session on the other hand was purely audio visual where the teenagers were allowed to view different Video clips featuring adults and teenage experts expounding on sexually, transmitted disease. The audio-visual session also addressed all the objectives just as the case was in the classroom set up in session one.
The third session was an open forum where the teenagers were allowed to ask questions, seek clarification on different issues or add more insight on concept learned. This session was an interactive one where all disturbing questions was addressed. The end of this session was marked by satisfactory response to all questions and insight brought forward by both the teacher and the teenagers.
The fourth and final session was an examination setup where each of the participants were given a quick test to test their understanding for the concepts learnt. Those who performed exemplary were awarded certificates and gifts and the whole were issued pa.
Running Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docx
Running Head: SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
3
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Summary of teaching plan
Title: Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Overview
Sexually Transmitted Diseases are diseases that are transmitted from one person to another during oral, anal and vaginal sexual activities. STDs are very common especially among sexually active teenagers and a number of them don’t have the symptoms making it hard to tell if one has contacted one. STDs are very dangerous to one’s health however, it can be detected when one is tested and majority of them have a cure (Bouchery, Harwood, and Brewer, 2014). STDs are preventable with abstinence and safe sexual practices; one is likely not to contract the disease. Examples of the STDs are: chlamydia, genital warts, gonorrhea, hepatitis B, herpes, HIV and AIDS, Human Papillomavirus, scabies, syphilis and trichomoniais (Stingler, Neusel, and Perry, 2013).
Objectives
1. To help the teenagers understand what STDs are as well as ways one can contract them
2. To teach the teenagers some of the preventive measures of contracting STDs.
3. To educate the teenagers on measures on should take incase exposed to an environment one is likely to contract STDs
4. To help the teenagers differentiate the myths from the facts regarding STDs
Materials
Video clips featuring adults and teenage experts, Graphic power point presentations
STD pamphlets, Writing materials: Pens and Plain papers, Teacher’s laptop, overhead screen
Estimated cost: Overhead screen will be offered by the church, additional materials needed about $45-$80
Directions
The learning sessions was grouped into four different sessions lasting approximately 30 to 45 minutes. In the first session, it was purely teaching session where I addressed all the objectives in a classroom setting and the teenagers were allowed to take notes. Teaching was enhanced with graphic power points to help create a visual understanding of the different concepts put across. The second session on the other hand was purely audio visual where the teenagers were allowed to view different Video clips featuring adults and teenage experts expounding on sexually, transmitted disease. The audio-visual session also addressed all the objectives just as the case was in the classroom set up in session one.
The third session was an open forum where the teenagers were allowed to ask questions, seek clarification on different issues or add more insight on concept learned. This session was an interactive one where all disturbing questions was addressed. The end of this session was marked by satisfactory response to all questions and insight brought forward by both the teacher and the teenagers.
The fourth and final session was an examination setup where each of the participants were given a quick test to test their understanding for the concepts learnt. Those who performed exemplary were awarded certificates and gifts and the whole were issued pa ...
1. Are there relationships between personal (hygiene, eating habits.docx
1. Are there relationships between personal (hygiene, eating habits, wearing of masks) social (public gatherings, proximity to one another) demographic (age, gender, education, racial ethnicity), and economic (occupation, level of education, annual income, home environment) factors and the spread, severity, and mortality rates of COVID patients worldwide?
2. Is there a difference in behaviour changes in people who have undergone cognitive behaviour therapy versus those who undergo pharmacologic intervention alone?
3. What is the difference in infection rates, pain intensity, inflammation, and restoration of functionality in people who have received prophylactic antibiotics and those who do not receive the prophylactic antibiotics during endodontic surgery?
4. What are nurses' perceptions towards patients who are non-adherent to the prescribed medications and are always complaining of deteriorating health?
Question one
: dependent and independent variables.
The dependent variables in the first question are hygiene eating habits, wearing masks, public gatherings, proximity to one another, occupation, level of education, annual income and home environment (variables), COVID patients (Population) and spread, severity, and mortality rates. (testability). The independent variables include age, gender, and race.
Why question 1?
The end of 2019 set the beginning of what would become a life-changing experience for virtually everyone worldwide in the following one year. When COVID-19 first struck in Wuhan China, nobody speculated that the disease would later spread across the globe, killing millions of people and negatively impacting the livelihood of the affected. Other than the deaths that the disease has brought upon innocent people, their governments across the nations have implemented stringent policies to help curb the spread, such as national lockdowns, closure of schools and other institutions, curfews, and other strict rules, all intended to prevent the infection rates. These government intervention measures had a huge economic, social, and personal impact on people and led to other problems, including but not limited to mental health.
Surprisingly, the disease was affecting different nations on varying intensities. For example, back in March 2020 COVID deaths in Italy were ranging above 700 on a daily basis while during the same time, there were very few cases and deaths in Africa (Di Lorenzo & Di Trolio, 2020; Onder et al., 2020). There were speculations that upon reaching Africa, COVID would lead to very high infection and mortality rates due to the poor healthcare systems and the relatively low economic status of most African countries. However, this turned out to be wrong as to date, the developed countries such as the USA, UK, and other European countries have the largest numbers of COVID cases and deaths (Bamgboye et al., 2020).
The relatively low numbers of new cases and deaths in Africa is intriguing. This calls for res.
Running head PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 1 .docx
Running head: PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 1
Perceived Benefits and Barriers about the MMR Vaccine among the Parents of a Pediatric
Population in South Florida
Florida International University
PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 2
Background
According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), about 1 in 4 people
in the United States will be hospitalized and one out of every 1,000 people with measles will
develop brain swelling that could lead to brain damage. Given the possible severity when
obtaining Measles, the CDC recommends to protect children against measles by obtaining a
vaccine that provides enduring insurance against all strains of measles (Measles, 2018). The
Measles, Mumps, and Rubella vaccine (MMR) is administered in two doses in order to prevent
an individual from obtaining one of those diseases. The first dose was given to children when
they are about 13 months old, which offers 90 to 95% protection against those diseases. The
second dose increases those protection odds to become 99%, which is administered before a
child turns five years old. In order for the vaccine to be immune in our system, we need to
achieve at least 95% of immunity to those diseases (Gardner, 2010).
Side effects of MMR vaccine
There is for all intents and purposes no medication without reactions. Gentle symptoms of MMR
vaccine include the following: fever, mild rash, and swelling of the glands in the cheeks or neck.
Moderate reactions include: febrile seizures, brief joint inflammation, and impermanent
thrombocytopenia. Serious side effects of MMR vaccine are amazingly uncommon, but can
include serious allergic responses. Other serious side effects are rare to the point that it is
difficult to recognize whether they are caused by the vaccine, which includes: deafness, long-
term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness, and lasting brain damage (Mahmić-Kaknjo, 2017).
PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 3
Barriers
Obtaining immunization has been viewed as one of the best general wellbeing accomplishments
of the twentieth century for their job in killing smallpox and controlling polio, measles, rubella,
and different irresistible ailments in the United States. Regardless of their adequacy in
forestalling and destroying illness, routine youth vaccine take-up remains problematic. Parent
refusal of immunizations has added to flare-ups of vaccine preventable infections, for example,
measles and pertussis (Maglione, 2014). Late episodes of measles in the United Kingdom and
United States have awoken reestablished worry about vaccination dismissal. The rate of
vaccination take-up has fallen. Individuals' view of vaccine protection and effectiveness has
appeared to be an imperative factor for immunization take-up that, in the meantime, can spread
between people (Medus, 2014).
Research has shown that guardians' frames of mind .
Running head PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 1 .docx
Running head: PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 1
Perceived Benefits and Barriers about the MMR Vaccine among the Parents of a Pediatric
Population in South Florida
Florida International University
PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 2
Background
According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), about 1 in 4 people
in the United States will be hospitalized and one out of every 1,000 people with measles will
develop brain swelling that could lead to brain damage. Given the possible severity when
obtaining Measles, the CDC recommends to protect children against measles by obtaining a
vaccine that provides enduring insurance against all strains of measles (Measles, 2018). The
Measles, Mumps, and Rubella vaccine (MMR) is administered in two doses in order to prevent
an individual from obtaining one of those diseases. The first dose was given to children when
they are about 13 months old, which offers 90 to 95% protection against those diseases. The
second dose increases those protection odds to become 99%, which is administered before a
child turns five years old. In order for the vaccine to be immune in our system, we need to
achieve at least 95% of immunity to those diseases (Gardner, 2010).
Side effects of MMR vaccine
There is for all intents and purposes no medication without reactions. Gentle symptoms of MMR
vaccine include the following: fever, mild rash, and swelling of the glands in the cheeks or neck.
Moderate reactions include: febrile seizures, brief joint inflammation, and impermanent
thrombocytopenia. Serious side effects of MMR vaccine are amazingly uncommon, but can
include serious allergic responses. Other serious side effects are rare to the point that it is
difficult to recognize whether they are caused by the vaccine, which includes: deafness, long-
term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness, and lasting brain damage (Mahmić-Kaknjo, 2017).
PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 3
Barriers
Obtaining immunization has been viewed as one of the best general wellbeing accomplishments
of the twentieth century for their job in killing smallpox and controlling polio, measles, rubella,
and different irresistible ailments in the United States. Regardless of their adequacy in
forestalling and destroying illness, routine youth vaccine take-up remains problematic. Parent
refusal of immunizations has added to flare-ups of vaccine preventable infections, for example,
measles and pertussis (Maglione, 2014). Late episodes of measles in the United Kingdom and
United States have awoken reestablished worry about vaccination dismissal. The rate of
vaccination take-up has fallen. Individuals' view of vaccine protection and effectiveness has
appeared to be an imperative factor for immunization take-up that, in the meantime, can spread
between people (Medus, 2014).
Research has shown that guardians' frames of mind ...
Running head PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 1 .docx
Running head: PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 1
Perceived Benefits and Barriers about the MMR Vaccine among the Parents of a Pediatric
Population in South Florida
Florida International University
PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 2
Background
According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), about 1 in 4 people
in the United States will be hospitalized and one out of every 1,000 people with measles will
develop brain swelling that could lead to brain damage. Given the possible severity when
obtaining Measles, the CDC recommends to protect children against measles by obtaining a
vaccine that provides enduring insurance against all strains of measles (Measles, 2018). The
Measles, Mumps, and Rubella vaccine (MMR) is administered in two doses in order to prevent
an individual from obtaining one of those diseases. The first dose was given to children when
they are about 13 months old, which offers 90 to 95% protection against those diseases. The
second dose increases those protection odds to become 99%, which is administered before a
child turns five years old. In order for the vaccine to be immune in our system, we need to
achieve at least 95% of immunity to those diseases (Gardner, 2010).
Side effects of MMR vaccine
There is for all intents and purposes no medication without reactions. Gentle symptoms of MMR
vaccine include the following: fever, mild rash, and swelling of the glands in the cheeks or neck.
Moderate reactions include: febrile seizures, brief joint inflammation, and impermanent
thrombocytopenia. Serious side effects of MMR vaccine are amazingly uncommon, but can
include serious allergic responses. Other serious side effects are rare to the point that it is
difficult to recognize whether they are caused by the vaccine, which includes: deafness, long-
term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness, and lasting brain damage (Mahmić-Kaknjo, 2017).
PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 3
Barriers
Obtaining immunization has been viewed as one of the best general wellbeing accomplishments
of the twentieth century for their job in killing smallpox and controlling polio, measles, rubella,
and different irresistible ailments in the United States. Regardless of their adequacy in
forestalling and destroying illness, routine youth vaccine take-up remains problematic. Parent
refusal of immunizations has added to flare-ups of vaccine preventable infections, for example,
measles and pertussis (Maglione, 2014). Late episodes of measles in the United Kingdom and
United States have awoken reestablished worry about vaccination dismissal. The rate of
vaccination take-up has fallen. Individuals' view of vaccine protection and effectiveness has
appeared to be an imperative factor for immunization take-up that, in the meantime, can spread
between people (Medus, 2014).
Research has shown that guardians' frames of mind .
Potential of social media as a tool to combat foodborne illness
Abstract
The use of social media platforms, such as Facebook and Twitter, has been increasing
substantially in recent years and has affected the way that people access information online.
Social media rely on high levels of interaction and user-generated context shared through
established and evolving social networks. Health information providers must know how to
successfully participate through social media in order to meet the needs of these online
audiences. This article reviews the current research on the use of social media for public health
communication and suggests potential frameworks for developing social media strategies. The
extension to food safety risk communication is explored, considering the potential of social
media as a tool to combat foodborne illness.
13 Assessing Current Approaches to Childhood Immunizatio
13
Assessing Current Approaches to Childhood Immunizations
Department of Psychology, Grand Canyon University
PSY-550: Research Methods
Dr. Shari Schwartz
May 19, 2021
Introduction
Immunization is the process in which an individual is protected against disease, and it is done via vaccination. On the other hand, vaccination is the action of a vaccine being introduced into the body to produce immunity to a particular disease. A vaccine is a product that arouses the immune system of an individual, thus the production of immunity to a particular disease. The immunity thus protects the individual from that disease. Immunity is the protection from a disease that is infectious. Child immunization is the primary public health approach in the reduction of child mortality and morbidity. Assessment of the current approaches that are linked to the immunization of a child is essential. Globally, primary immunization is estimated to prevent approximately 2.5 million childhood deaths annually from tetanus, diphtheria, measles, and pertussis (Dube et al., 2013). Immunization succession is always accompanied by rejection of public health practices, and reasons for these have never been straightforward. Some of the motivations are religious, scientific, or even political. To reduce the incidence and prevalence of vaccine-preventable diseases, vaccination programs depend on a high uptake level. Vaccination offers protection for vaccinated individuals. When there are high vaccination coverage rates, the indirect protection rate is stimulated for the overall community (Dube et al., 2013).Literature Review
Despite this massive use, immunization coverage in countries still developing has been reported to be still low. If mothers were educated on the importance of these vaccine services to their children, all the children would receive immunization as per the Expanded Program on the Immunization schedule, hence preventing mortality and morbidity. According to Thapar et al., in 2014, approximately an 18.7million children could not get the third dose of the Diphtheria-Pertussis-Tetanus (DPT3) vaccine. The total percentage of children who are one year and below and have to receive their dosses of DPT3 vaccine is seen as a proxy indicator regarding full immunization. The DPT3 estimates assess the health system performance and measure the immunization program effectiveness regarding service delivery. These strategies are thus used in the implementation of strategies for the elimination and eradication of diseases. According to Thapar et al., the global coverage for DPT1 and DPT3 was 90% and 86%, respectively, while that of measles first dose at 86%.
The above estimates thus do not replicate the seen differences in vaccine coverage. The coverage of DPT1 and DPT3 varied from 84% and 76% in Africa and 97% and 94% in the European countries. In India, the routine has been lower than in the rest of the countries. Following the 2013 outbreak in Israel, many paren ...
Similar to USF.VaccineLink.FPHA.poster.final.8.18.15 (20)
Social media in health--what are the safety concerns for health consumers?
Social media in health--what are the safety concerns for health consumers?
Running Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docx
Running Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docx
Running Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docx
Running Head SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASESSEXUALLY TRANSMIT.docx
1. Are there relationships between personal (hygiene, eating habits.docx
1. Are there relationships between personal (hygiene, eating habits.docx
Running head PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 1 .docx
Running head PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 1 .docx
Running head PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 1 .docx
Running head PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 1 .docx
Running head PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 1 .docx
Running head PERCEIVED BENEFITS AND BARRIES ON MMR VACCINE 1 .docx
Potential of social media as a tool to combat foodborne illness
Potential of social media as a tool to combat foodborne illness
Achieving polio eradication a review of helth communication evidence and le...
Achieving polio eradication a review of helth communication evidence and le...
13 Assessing Current Approaches to Childhood Immunizatio
13 Assessing Current Approaches to Childhood Immunizatio
USF.VaccineLink.FPHA.poster.final.8.18.15
- 1. Objec&ves: Significance: Interven&on: Results: Jamie P. Morano, MD, MPH; Meghan Borysova, PhD; Arturo Rebellon-‐Guardado, MD, DrPH; Viviana Delgado; Coni Williams, MS; April Schenck, MBA; Mimi Ghosh, MPH; Dawood Sultan, PhD Ÿ Vaccine hesitancy among children and adults is rising in Florida and in the U.S. Ÿ Barriers to vaccina9on, especially among adult Hispanic and African Americans, are not en9rely understood Ÿ To use a community based par9cipatory research approach to assess and remedy barriers to the main adult vaccina9ons in Florida Hillsborough and Polk coun9es Ÿ To use innova9ve mobile tablet consent, survey, and instruc9onal technology to reduce barriers to vaccina9on Douglas Holt, MD, FACP; Ulyee Choe, DO; John SinnoK, MD, FACP; Abigail Wold; Veronica Estrella, MS; Jessica Alvarez, MD; Sharath TadisheO; Ogie Umasabor-‐Bubu, MD, MPH Ÿ Field vaccine health navigators conducted pre-‐ and post-‐interven9on using a revised Likert Scale (1-‐4) in community seIngs Ÿ “5A’s of Vaccina9on” educa9onal interven9on (either video or spoken) included “Awareness, Addi9ves, Au9sm Myth, Assist Others, and Accessibility” Table 1: Demographic characteris9cs of mobile table respondents, Hillsborough and Polk Coun9es, Florida, November 2014 to June 2015. (N=224) Figure 1: GIS Credit: Arturo Rebellon-‐Guardado, MD, DrPH Implica&ons: VACCINES GO ELECTRIC: U&lizing Mobile Tablet Technology with a Novel Bilingual “5A’s Interven&on Model” to Overcome Vaccina&on Barriers in Adult Florida Popula&ons Acknowledgements: Table 2 (cont’d): Pre-‐and Post-‐Interven9on Reponses along the “5 A’s”; Hillsborough and Polk Coun9es, Florida, November 2014 to June 2015. (N=224) Figure 2: Ÿ Community-‐based educa9onal interven9ons are effec9ve in improving percep9ons of vaccine safety and efficacy Ÿ Mobile technologies are an effec9ve way to reduce barriers to vaccina9on in communi9es Table 2: