Global	
  Cobalt	
  Corp.	
  	
  
	
  
	
  
“Powered	
  by	
  Cobalt”	
  
	
  
	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  	
  
TSXV:GCO,	
  OTCBB:GLBCF,	
  FRA:3P0	
  
DEVELOPING	
  	
  
VALUE	
  
Regarding	
  Forward-­‐Looking	
  Statements	
  
This	
  presentaJon	
  includes	
  certain	
  “forward-­‐looking	
  statements”	
  and	
  “forward-­‐looking	
  informaJon”	
  within	
  the	
  meaning	
  of	
  applicable	
  securiJes	
  laws,	
  concerning	
  the	
  business,	
  operaJons	
  and	
  
financial	
  performance	
  and	
  condiJon	
  of	
  the	
  Company.	
  	
  All	
  statements,	
  other	
  than	
  statements	
  of	
  historical	
  fact,	
  are	
  forward-­‐looking	
  statements.	
  	
  Forward-­‐looking	
  statements	
  are	
  frequently,	
  but	
  
not	
  always,	
  idenJfied	
  by	
  words	
  such	
  as	
  “plans”,	
  “expects”,	
  “anJcipates”,	
  “believes”,	
  “intends”,	
  “esJmates”,	
  “potenJal”,	
  “possible”	
  and	
  similar	
  expressions,	
  or	
  statements	
  that	
  events,	
  condiJons	
  
or	
  results	
  “will”,	
  “may”,	
  “could”,	
  or	
  “should”	
  occur	
  or	
  be	
  achieved.	
  	
  Forward-­‐looking	
  statements	
  contained	
  in	
  this	
  presentaJon	
  include	
  statements	
  with	
  respect	
  to:	
  expectaJons	
  regarding	
  the	
  
potenJal	
  mineralizaJon	
  and	
  geological	
  merits	
  of	
  the	
  Company’s	
  projects,	
  including	
  the	
  Karakul	
  Project	
  and	
  the	
  Werner	
  Lake	
  Project;	
  the	
  Company’s	
  goals	
  regarding	
  development	
  of	
  the	
  Karakul	
  
Project	
  and	
  regarding	
  raising	
  capital	
  and	
  conducJng	
  further	
  exploraJon	
  and	
  development	
  of	
  its	
  projects;	
  the	
  Company’s	
  proposed	
  plans	
  for	
  advancing	
  its	
  projects,	
  including	
  drilling	
  and	
  other	
  
exploraJon	
  work;	
  expectaJons	
  regarding	
  the	
  conJnuity	
  of	
  mineral	
  deposits,	
  including	
  in	
  relaJon	
  to	
  adjacent	
  or	
  other	
  properJes	
  (including	
  producing	
  or	
  past-­‐producing	
  properJes)	
  that	
  are	
  in	
  the	
  
vicinity	
  or	
  same	
  region	
  as	
  the	
  Company’s	
  projects;	
  expectaJons	
  regarding	
  any	
  environmental	
  issues	
  that	
  may	
  affect	
  planned	
  or	
  future	
  exploitaJon	
  and	
  exploraJon	
  programs;	
  mineral	
  exploitaJon	
  
and	
  exploraJon	
  program	
  cost	
  esJmates;	
  statements	
  with	
  respect	
  to	
  the	
  future	
  price	
  of	
  cobalt	
  and	
  other	
  metals;	
  Jming	
  and	
  compleJon	
  of	
  geological	
  studies	
  and	
  reports;	
  receipt	
  and	
  Jming	
  of	
  the	
  
necessary	
  exploitaJon	
  permits	
  and	
  other	
  third	
  party	
  approvals;	
  and	
  government	
  regulaJon	
  of	
  mineral	
  exploraJon	
  and	
  development	
  operaJons	
  in	
  Russia.	
   	
  EsJmates	
  of	
  mineral	
  resources	
  and	
  
mineral	
  reserves	
  may	
  also	
  consJtute	
  forward-­‐looking	
  statements	
  and	
  informaJon	
  in	
  that	
  they	
  represent	
  esJmates	
  of	
  mineralizaJon	
  that	
  may	
  be	
  encountered	
  if	
  mining	
  is	
  commenced,	
  and/or	
  
economic	
  viability	
  of	
  such	
  mineralizaJon.	
  
Forward-­‐looking	
  statements	
  involve	
  various	
  risks	
  and	
  uncertainJes.	
  	
  There	
  can	
  be	
  no	
  assurance	
  that	
  such	
  statements	
  will	
  prove	
  to	
  be	
  accurate,	
  and	
  actual	
  results	
  and	
  future	
  events	
  could	
  differ	
  
materially	
  from	
  those	
  anJcipated	
  in	
  such	
  statements.	
  	
  Important	
  factors	
  that	
  could	
  cause	
  actual	
  results	
  to	
  differ	
  materially	
  from	
  our	
  expectaJons	
  include	
  the	
  uncertainJes	
  involving	
  the	
  need	
  for	
  
addiJonal	
  financing	
  to	
  explore	
  and	
  develop	
  properJes	
  and	
  availability	
  of	
  financing	
  in	
  the	
  debt	
  and	
  capital	
  markets;	
  uncertainJes	
  involved	
  in	
  the	
  interpretaJon	
  of	
  drilling	
  results	
  and	
  geological	
  
tests	
  and	
  the	
  esJmaJon	
  of	
  reserves	
  and	
  resources;	
  the	
  need	
  for	
  cooperaJon	
  of	
  government	
  agencies	
  and	
  naJve	
  groups	
  in	
  the	
  development	
  and	
  operaJon	
  of	
  properJes;	
  the	
  need	
  to	
  obtain	
  
permits	
   and	
   governmental	
   approvals;	
   risks	
   of	
   construcJon	
   and	
   mining	
   projects	
   such	
   as	
   accidents,	
   equipment	
   breakdowns,	
   bad	
   weather,	
   non-­‐compliance	
   with	
   environmental	
   and	
   permit	
  
requirements,	
  unanJcipated	
  variaJon	
  in	
  geological	
  structures,	
  ore	
  grades	
  or	
  recovery	
  rates;	
  unexpected	
  cost	
  increases;	
  fluctuaJons	
  in	
  metal	
  prices	
  and	
  currency	
  exchange	
  rates;	
  the	
  impact	
  of	
  
economic	
  sancJons	
  on	
  companies	
  conducJng	
  business	
  in	
  Russia;	
  and	
  other	
  risk	
  and	
  uncertainJes	
  disclosed	
  in	
  reports	
  and	
  documents	
  filed	
  by	
  the	
  Company	
  with	
  applicable	
  securiJes	
  regulatory	
  
authoriJes	
  from	
  Jme	
  to	
  Jme.	
  	
  The	
  forward-­‐looking	
  statements	
  made	
  herein	
  reflect	
  the	
  Company’s	
  beliefs,	
  opinions	
  and	
  projecJons	
  on	
  the	
  date	
  the	
  statements	
  are	
  made.	
  	
  Except	
  as	
  required	
  by	
  
law,	
  the	
  Company	
  assumes	
  no	
  obligaJon	
  to	
  update	
  the	
  forward-­‐looking	
  statements	
  of	
  beliefs,	
  opinions,	
  projecJons,	
  or	
  other	
  factors,	
  should	
  they	
  change.	
  
	
  
Regarding	
  Historical	
  Resources	
  
Note	
  that	
  the	
  C1	
  and	
  C2	
  	
  resource	
  esJmates	
  shown	
  are	
  historical	
  in	
  nature	
  and	
  do	
  not	
  use	
  categories	
  defined	
  in	
  Canadian	
  NaJonal	
  Instrument	
  43-­‐101	
  Standards	
  of	
  Disclosure	
  for	
  Mineral	
  Projects	
  
(“NI	
  43-­‐101”)	
  and	
  accordingly	
  are	
  not	
  compliant	
  with	
  NI	
  43-­‐101	
  or	
  Canadian	
  InsJtute	
  of	
  Mining,	
  Metallurgy	
  and	
  Petroleum	
  (“CIM”)	
  standards.	
  	
  [The	
  exact	
  date	
  of	
  these	
  es=mates	
  is	
  unknown].	
  
Historical	
  resource	
  esJmates	
  are	
  based	
  on	
  the	
  Russian	
  reserve	
  system	
  and	
  based	
  primarily	
  on	
  trench	
  and	
  prospecJng	
  samples	
  only.	
  	
  These	
  resources	
  are	
  considered	
  historical	
  in	
  nature	
  under	
  NI	
  
43-­‐101	
  and	
  a	
  qualified	
  person	
  under	
  NI	
  43-­‐101	
  has	
  not	
  done	
  sufficient	
  work	
  to	
  classify	
  the	
  historical	
  esJmate	
  as	
  current	
  mineral	
  resources.	
  	
  The	
  Company	
  is	
  not	
  treaJng	
  the	
  historical	
  esJmate	
  as	
  
current	
  mineral	
  resources.	
  
	
  
Regarding	
  Mineral	
  Reserve	
  and	
  Resource	
  Es=mates	
  
Unless	
  otherwise	
  indicated,	
  all	
  reserve	
  and	
  resource	
  esJmates	
  included	
  in	
  this	
  presentaJon	
  have	
  been	
  prepared	
  in	
  accordance	
  with	
  NI	
  43-­‐101	
  and	
  CIM	
  standards.	
  	
  Canadian	
  standards,	
  including	
  
NI	
   43-­‐101,	
   differ	
   significantly	
   from	
   the	
   requirements	
   of	
   the	
   United	
   States	
   SecuriJes	
   and	
   Exchange	
   Commissions	
   ,	
   and	
   reserve	
   and	
   resource	
   informaJon	
   in	
   this	
   presentaJon	
   may	
   not	
   be	
  
comparable	
  to	
  similar	
  informaJon	
  disclosed	
  by	
  U.S.	
  companies.	
  	
  In	
  parJcular,	
  and	
  without	
  limiJng	
  the	
  generality	
  of	
  the	
  foregoing,	
  the	
  term	
  “resource”	
  does	
  not	
  equate	
  to	
  the	
  term	
  “‘reserves”.	
  	
  
Under	
   U.S.	
   standards,	
   mineralizaJon	
   may	
   not	
   be	
   classified	
   as	
   a	
   “reserve”	
   unless	
   the	
   determinaJon	
   has	
   been	
   made	
   that	
   the	
   mineralizaJon	
   could	
   be	
   economically	
   and	
   legally	
   produced	
   or	
  
extracted	
  at	
  the	
  Jme	
  the	
  reserve	
  determinaJon	
  is	
  made.	
  
	
  
Qualified	
  Person	
  
Mr.	
  Paul	
  Sarjeant,	
  P.	
  Geo.,	
  is	
  a	
  Qualified	
  Person	
  as	
  defined	
  by	
  NI	
  43-­‐101.	
  	
  Mr.	
  Sarjeant	
  is	
  the	
  Company’s	
  Vice	
  President	
  ExploraJon,	
  and,	
  unless	
  otherwise	
  indicated,	
  has	
  prepared	
  or	
  supervised	
  
the	
  preparaJon	
  of	
  the	
  technical	
  informaJon	
  contained	
  in	
  this	
  presentaJon	
  and/or	
  reviewed	
  and	
  approved	
  such	
  disclosure.	
  	
  For	
  more	
  informaJon,	
  see	
  the	
  individual	
  technical	
  reports	
  and	
  news	
  
releases	
  available	
  under	
  the	
  Company’s	
  profile	
  at	
  www.sedar.com	
  	
  
	
  
All	
  monetary	
  amounts	
  in	
  this	
  presentaJon	
  are	
  in	
  Canadian	
  dollars	
  unless	
  otherwise	
  indicated.	
  
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
2	
  
Explore market
opportunities as they
emerge in various sectors
of the strategic metals
sector with emphasis on
those metals, such as
cobalt, used in the
rechargeable battery
space.
3
STRATEGY OVERVIEW
3	
  
MARKET CAPITALIZATION
4	
  
Global	
  Cobalt	
  Corp.	
   TSX-­‐V:GCO	
  
Issued	
  &	
  Outstanding	
   93,758,888	
  
Warrants	
   14,394,659	
  
OpJons	
   4,555,000	
  
Fully	
  Diluted	
   112,708,547	
  
52	
  Week	
  High/Low	
   $0.14/$0.03	
  
Market	
  Cap.	
   $5M	
  
Warrants	
  
Expiry	
  Date	
   Issued	
   Price	
  	
   Warrant	
  
Descrip=on	
  
Sept.	
  19,	
  2015	
   1,812,060	
   $0.073	
   Private	
  
Placement	
  
Nov.	
  6,	
  2015	
   4,181,000	
   $0.070	
   Private	
  
Placement	
  
Nov.	
  25,	
  2016	
   2,284,200	
   $0.065	
   Private	
  
Placement	
  
Jan.	
  27,	
  2017	
   6,117,399	
   $0.35	
   Private	
  
Placement	
  
Stock	
  Op=ons	
  
Expiry	
  Date	
   Issued	
   Price	
  	
   Value	
  
CAD	
  $	
  
Dec.	
  9,	
  2018	
   4,555,000	
   $0.10	
   $455,500	
  
IMHL	
  
30%	
  
MANAGEMENT	
  
10%	
  
INSTITUTIONAL	
  
10%	
  
RETAIL	
  
50%	
  
Ownership	
  Structure	
  
“POWERED BY COBALT”
EsJmated	
  values	
  given	
  43-­‐101	
  non-­‐compliant	
  	
  C1+C2	
  Soviet	
  Resource	
  in	
  addiJon	
  to	
  	
  historic	
  	
  equivalent	
  of	
  10%	
  of	
  the	
  P1	
  Soviet	
  defined	
  resource.	
  	
  
5	
  
LOW	
  PRICE	
  +	
  SUPPLY	
  RISK	
  +	
  GROWING	
  DEMAND	
  	
  
=	
  OPPORTUNITY	
  IN	
  COBALT	
  
Renewable	
  
	
  Energy	
  	
  
	
  
•  Solar	
  panel	
  technology	
  
•  Wind	
  generaJon	
  
(turbines)	
  
•  Energy	
  storage	
  
Aerospace	
  
Technology	
  &	
  
Hardened	
  Steel	
  
•  Jet	
  engine	
  turbines	
  &	
  
military	
  technology	
  
•  Wear	
  resistant	
  &	
  high	
  
strength	
  steel	
  alloys	
  
•  High	
  speed	
  steels	
  	
  
•  Magnets	
  
Hybrid	
  Electric	
  
Vehicle	
  (HEV)	
  
Baueries	
  	
  
•  EssenJal	
  component	
  
in	
  growing	
  
rechargeable	
  bauery	
  
sector	
  
•  Diminishes	
  demand	
  
for	
  fossil	
  fuels	
  and	
  
reduces	
  air	
  polluJon	
  
Digital
Revolution and
Electronics
•  Mobile phones &
smartphones
•  Computers & other
electronic goods
including iPods &
iPads
•  Integrated circuits 5	
  
COBALT & RECHARGEABLE
BATTERIES
EsJmated	
  values	
  given	
  43-­‐101	
  non-­‐compliant	
  	
  C1+C2	
  Soviet	
  Resource	
  in	
  addiJon	
  to	
  	
  historic	
  	
  equivalent	
  of	
  10%	
  of	
  the	
  P1	
  Soviet	
  defined	
  resource.	
  	
  
6	
  
FACT:	
  Cobalt	
  chemicals	
  are	
  a	
  criJcal	
  component	
  for	
  rechargeable	
  baueries	
  
•  The	
  rechargeable	
  bauery	
  market	
  is	
  experiencing	
  rapid	
  growth	
  due	
  to	
  the	
  conJnued	
  proliferaJon	
  of	
  
portable	
  electronic	
  devices.	
  	
  	
  
•  In	
  addiJon	
  the	
  emergence	
  of	
  electric	
  vehicles	
  is	
  anJcipated	
  to	
  further	
  boost	
  the	
  demand	
  for	
  cobalt	
  in	
  
baueries	
  
•  Bauery	
  is	
  the	
  single	
  largest	
  use	
  of	
  cobalt	
  accounJng	
  for	
  42%	
  of	
  cobalt	
  demand	
  and	
  is	
  the	
  primary	
  
driver	
  of	
  the	
  cobalt	
  market	
  
LITHIUM	
  COBALT	
  BATTERIES:	
  Advanced,	
  Higher	
  Energy	
  Density,	
  Lighter	
  
Is	
  	
  
Lithium	
  Cobalt	
  Oxide	
  (LCO)	
  
Lithium	
  Nickel	
  Manganese	
  Cobalt	
  Oxide	
  (NMC)	
  
Lithium	
  Nickel	
  Cobalt	
  Aluminum	
  Oxide	
  (NCA)	
  
60%	
  
Cobalt	
  by	
  Weight	
  
10-­‐20%	
  
Cobalt	
  by	
  Weight	
  
9%	
  
Cobalt	
  by	
  Weight	
  
By	
  the	
  Year	
  
2020	
  COBALT	
  
use	
  in	
  bauery	
  
applicaJons	
  is	
  
esJmated	
  to	
  be	
  
greater	
  than	
  the	
  
current	
  enJre	
  
world	
  market	
  for	
  
refined	
  cobalt	
  
Source:	
  Roskill	
  
DRIVING THE DEMAND
EsJmated	
  values	
  given	
  43-­‐101	
  non-­‐compliant	
  	
  C1+C2	
  Soviet	
  Resource	
  in	
  addiJon	
  to	
  	
  historic	
  	
  equivalent	
  of	
  10%	
  of	
  the	
  P1	
  Soviet	
  defined	
  resource.	
  	
  
7	
  
Ba`ery	
  Usage	
  Accounts	
  	
  
for	
  42%	
  of	
  Cobalt	
  Demand	
  
Nickel-­‐Metal	
  Hydride	
  
Ba`eries	
  
Lithium-­‐Ion	
  
Ba`eries	
  
Bauery	
  
Usage,	
  
42%	
  
Other,	
  
39%	
  
Super	
  
Alloys,	
  
19%	
  
61%	
  of	
  mined	
  cobalt	
  is	
  sourced	
  from	
  the	
  geo-­‐
poliJcally	
  unstable	
  D.R.	
  Congo	
  
China	
  refines	
  43%	
  of	
  the	
  world’s	
  cobalt	
  
Cobalt	
  is	
  recognized	
  as	
  strategically	
  important	
  by	
  
both	
  the	
  USA	
  and	
  EU	
  as	
  it	
  is	
  criJcal	
  to	
  a	
  number	
  
metallurgical	
  and	
  chemical	
  products	
  and	
  is	
  
suscepJble	
  to	
  supply	
  concerns	
  
1-­‐4kg	
  of	
  Cobalt	
  
in	
  a	
  Car	
  Bauery	
  
2-­‐8kg	
  of	
  Cobalt	
  
in	
  a	
  Car	
  Bauery	
  
15%	
   60%	
  15%	
  Cobalt	
  by	
  
Weight	
  
60%	
  Cobalt	
  by	
  
Weight	
  
Cobalt	
  
Demand	
  
Source:	
  Roskill	
  
PRICED AT HISTORIC LOWS
EsJmated	
  values	
  given	
  43-­‐101	
  non-­‐compliant	
  	
  C1+C2	
  Soviet	
  Resource	
  in	
  addiJon	
  to	
  	
  historic	
  	
  equivalent	
  of	
  10%	
  of	
  the	
  P1	
  Soviet	
  defined	
  resource.	
  	
  
8	
  
Price forecasts…
Roskill price forecasts to 2018 ($/lb)
Source: Roskill
0
5
10
15
20
25
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
MB prices Roskill forecasts
! An export ban on DRC
concentrates
! New mining code in DRC
! Power disruptions in Africa
! Lower than expected
demand in key sectors and
applications
! World economic markets
falter
16/05/2014
Cobalt free market in warehouse monthly average prices (US$ per lb)
Source: Metal Bulletin
Historical cobalt prices…
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
Jan-97
Sep-97
May-98
Jan-99
Sep-99
May-00
Jan-01
Sep-01
May-02
Jan-03
Sep-03
May-04
Jan-05
Sep-05
May-06
Jan-07
Sep-07
May-08
Jan-09
Sep-09
May-10
Jan-11
Sep-11
May-12
Jan-13
Sep-13
May-14
Low Price High Price
Source:	
  Roskill	
  presentaJon	
  delivered	
  at	
  the	
  Cobalt	
  Development	
  InsJtute	
  Cobalt	
  Conference	
  May	
  21st,	
  2014	
  	
  
THE PROJECT PORTFOLIO
EsJmated	
  values	
  given	
  43-­‐101	
  non-­‐compliant	
  	
  C1+C2	
  Soviet	
  Resource	
  in	
  addiJon	
  to	
  	
  historic	
  	
  equivalent	
  of	
  10%	
  of	
  the	
  P1	
  Soviet	
  defined	
  resource.	
  	
  
“Develop	
  ExisJng	
  Resources	
  and	
  Expand	
  Our	
  Asset	
  
Porvolio	
  &	
  Footprint	
  in	
  the	
  Strategic	
  Metals	
  Sector,	
  
Regionally	
  and	
  Worldwide”	
  
9	
  
10
•  The	
  Werner	
  Lake	
  Project	
  consists	
  of	
  the	
  historic	
  Werner	
  Lake	
  and	
  Werner	
  Lake	
  
West	
  cobalt-­‐copper-­‐gold	
  mines	
  
•  The	
  project	
  lies	
  within	
  the	
  Werner	
  Lake	
  Belt,	
  that	
  also	
  hosts	
  the	
  historic	
  Gordon	
  
Lake	
  copper-­‐nickel	
  mine	
  
•  	
  The	
  present	
  day	
  Werner	
  Lake	
  Project	
  hosts	
  the	
  two	
  former	
  cobalt	
  producers	
  
and	
  several	
  other	
  auracJve	
  exploraJon	
  targets	
  
•  The	
  Werner	
  Lake	
  Mine	
  produced	
  146,386	
  lbs	
  of	
  cobalt	
  from	
  1940	
  to	
  1944	
  	
  
•  The	
  Werner	
  Lake	
  West	
  Mine	
  produced	
  approximately	
  10,000	
  tonnes	
  of	
  cobalt	
  
ore	
  between	
  1996	
  and	
  1997	
  under	
  the	
  direcJon	
  of	
  Canmine	
  Resources	
  
CorporaJon	
  
•  Significant	
  opportunity	
  to	
  increase	
  exisJng	
  resource	
  with	
  planned	
  exploraJon	
  
and	
  extension	
  program	
  
*The	
  historical	
  resource	
  esJmates	
  at	
  Werner	
  Lake	
  are	
  not	
  being	
  treated	
  as	
  a	
  mineral	
  reserve	
  or	
  mineral	
  resource.	
  	
  Key	
  assumpJons,	
  parameters,	
  and	
  methods	
  used	
  to	
  prepare	
  the	
  historical	
  esJmates	
  are	
  not	
  known.	
  	
  
A	
  qualified	
  person	
  has	
  not	
  done	
  sufficient	
  work	
  to	
  classify	
  the	
  historical	
  esJmate	
  as	
  a	
  mineral	
  resource	
  or	
  mineral	
  reserve.	
  	
  AddiJonal	
  drilling	
  and	
  tesJng	
  is	
  required	
  to	
  determine	
  a	
  current	
  classificaJon	
  as	
  a	
  mineral	
  
resource	
  or	
  mineral	
  reserve.	
  	
  The	
  Company	
  is	
  not	
  treaJng	
  the	
  historical	
  informaJon	
  as	
  a	
  current	
  mineral	
  resource	
  or	
  mineral	
  reserve	
  and	
  the	
  reader	
  is	
  cauJoned	
  to	
  not	
  rely	
  upon	
  this	
  data.	
  	
  Please	
  refer	
  to	
  the	
  
“Werner	
  Lake	
  Mineral	
  Belt	
  ProperJes	
  Technical	
  Report”	
  by	
  Gerald	
  Harper,	
  Ph.D.,	
  P.Geo.	
  (On),	
  dated	
  March	
  22,	
  2011	
  and	
  revised	
  June	
  23,	
  2011	
  as	
  filed	
  on	
  SEDAR.	
  
WERNER LAKE – PRIMARY
COBALT IN CANADA
Drill	
  Rig	
  at	
  Werner	
  
Core	
  from	
  Werner	
  
Tonnes	
   Cobalt	
  (%)	
   Copper	
  (%)	
   Gold	
  (opt)	
  
Proven	
  Reserves*	
   140,031	
   0.47	
   0.26	
   0.008	
  
Probable	
  Reserves*	
   40,829	
   0.25	
   0.43	
   0.030	
  
Total*	
   180,860	
   0.42	
   0.30	
   0.013	
  
Indicated	
  Resources*	
   51,456	
   0.13	
   0.20	
   0.003	
  
Inferred	
  Resources*	
   869,378	
   0.29	
   0.28	
   0.011	
  
11
WERNER LAKE PROJECT
LOCATION
	
  
	
  
	
  
Lake
Winnipeg
Lake of the
Woods
Winnipeg
Lac du Bonnet
Kenora
ONTARIO
MANITOBA
MINNESOTA
WERNER LAKE
PROJECT
Caribou
Falls
Grassy
Narrows
10 10 20 30 40 50020
KILOMETRES
Minaki
Canadian Pacific Railway
Canadian Pacific RailwayCanadian National Railway
12
71
315
1
Werner Lake Project
Kenora Mining District, NW Ontario
12
WERNER LAKE MINERAL BELT
PHASE I & II DRILL RESULTS
Completed:	
  
•  1.21%	
  cobalt	
  over	
  12.30	
  metres	
  
•  High-­‐grade	
  intercept	
  of	
  over	
  12%	
  cobalt	
  over	
  0.90	
  metres	
  
•  High-­‐grade	
  intercepts	
  associated	
  with	
  anomalous	
  Cu,	
  Ni	
  and	
  Au	
  
values	
  
•  Over	
  12%	
  Co	
  returned	
  in	
  hole	
  WL10-­‐004	
  showing	
  a	
  zone	
  of	
  more	
  
than	
  5%	
  sulphides	
  in	
  peridoJte	
  with	
  porJons	
  that	
  carry	
  from	
  5	
  to	
  
45%	
  sulphides	
  
•  Discovery	
  of	
  high	
  grade	
  eastern	
  extension	
  of	
  800	
  metres	
  from	
  
Werner	
  Lake	
  cobalt	
  deposit	
  
•  7,565m	
  of	
  drilling	
  in	
  31	
  holes	
  over	
  the	
  winter	
  and	
  spring	
  of	
  
2009-­‐2010	
  
Next	
  Steps:	
  
•  Evaluate	
  Werner	
  Lake	
  with	
  a	
  goal	
  to	
  resume	
  the	
  work	
  necessary	
  to	
  
finalize	
  the	
  already	
  iniJated	
  NI	
  43-­‐101	
  compliant	
  resource	
  report	
  
13
LOCATION OF MINERAL
DEPOSITS IN THE WERNER LAKE BELT
	
  
	
  
	
  
Granitoid Rocks (undivided)
Mafic Gneiss & ultramafic-mafic intrusions
Metasedimentary migmatite assemblage
Werner-Rex Lake Fault
Magmatic Ni-Cu-Cr-PGE deposits
Co-Cu and Co skarnoid deposits
Remobilised sulphide deposits
Werner Lake Mine
Gordon Lake Mine
Norpax
Deposit East Werner
Lake
km
40
Location of Mineral Deposits in the Werner Lake Belt
Proposed Airborne Geophysics Survey
Eastern Shallows AREA OF PROPOSED
AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICS
14
SIMPLIFIED GEOLOGY, MINE SITES
AND SHOWINGS
	
  
	
  
	
  
Metasedimentary Rocks
Granitoid Intrusions
Tonalite-Trondhjemite-
Granodiorite Intrusions
Ultramafic Rocks
Migmatites
Amphibolite & Alteration
Roads
Co-Cu-Au Mineralisation
Fault
km
2500
Limit of Mapping
Limit of Mapping
Werner Lake Project
Simplified Geology, Mine Sites and Showings
Werner Lake West
Old Mine Site
East Zone
15
*The	
  historical	
  resource	
  esJmates	
  at	
  Werner	
  Lake	
  are	
  not	
  being	
  treated	
  as	
  a	
  mineral	
  reserve	
  or	
  mineral	
  resource.	
   	
  Key	
  assumpJons,	
  parameters,	
  and	
  methods	
  used	
  to	
  
prepare	
  the	
  historical	
  esJmates	
  are	
  not	
  known.	
  	
  A	
  qualified	
  person	
  has	
  not	
  done	
  sufficient	
  work	
  to	
  classify	
  the	
  historical	
  esJmate	
  as	
  a	
  mineral	
  resource	
  or	
  mineral	
  reserve.	
  	
  
AddiJonal	
   drilling	
   and	
   tesJng	
   is	
   required	
   to	
   determine	
   a	
   current	
   classificaJon	
   as	
   a	
   mineral	
   resource	
   or	
   mineral	
   reserve.	
   	
   The	
   Company	
   is	
   not	
   treaJng	
   the	
   historical	
  
informaJon	
  as	
  a	
  current	
  mineral	
  resource	
  or	
  mineral	
  reserve	
  and	
  the	
  reader	
  is	
  cauJoned	
  to	
  not	
  rely	
  upon	
  this	
  data.	
   	
  Please	
  refer	
  to	
  the	
  “Werner	
  Lake	
  Mineral	
  Belt	
  
ProperJes	
  Technical	
  Report”	
  by	
  Gerald	
  Harper,	
  Ph.D.,	
  P.Geo.	
  (On),	
  dated	
  March	
  22,	
  2011	
  and	
  revised	
  June	
  23,	
  2011	
  as	
  filed	
  on	
  SEDAR.	
  
WERNER LAKE MINERAL BELT
IDEALIZED LONGITUDINAL SECTION
	
  
	
  
	
  
350 m
150 m
50 m
Werner Lake Idealised Longitudinal Section
(Looking North)
200m
250 m
West East
Surface
Werner West Zone
Old Mine Site
Historic Resource Area
Recent Drill Hole
10-019
0.028, 0.507
3.3
0.120, 0.560
1.4
0.05, 0.46
0.80
1.21, 0.22
12.3
09-001
10-005
09-002
10-004
10-003
10-006
10-008
10-012
10-007
10-01910-023
10-020
10-011
10-009
10-010
10-028
10-018
10-021
10-025 10-027
10-030
10-026
10-032
10-024
10-022
10-013 10-017
10-015
10-016
10-029
10-033
10-031B
10-014
0.14, 0.38
3.1
0.124, 4.346
1.2
0.04, 0.20
1.9
0.012, 0.323
0.4
0.102, 0.266
2,4
0.10, 0.37
4.3
0.011, 0.382
0.9
0.053, 0.159
1.2
0.122, 0.241
0.9
0.377, 0.135
1.6
NSR
NSR
NSR
0.011, 0.431
1.3
0.020, 0.234
0.9
NSR
0.025, 2.43
4.9
0.289, 0.096
4.7
0.288, 0.156
1.1
NSR
NSR
NSR
0.279, 0.085
2.7
0.039, 0.422
1.4
0.007, 0.142
1.0
0.017, 0.274
3.0
0.196, 0.145
2.8
NSR
% Co, % Cu
m
16
PHASE 1: WERNER LAKE
GOALS, PROJECTIONS &
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS
TASK	
   STATUS	
   FUNDING	
  
REQUIREMENT	
  
Project	
  Management	
  /	
  Data	
  CompilaJon	
   2015	
  Q1-­‐Q4	
   $90,000	
  
Land	
  AcquisiJon	
  –	
  Staking	
   2015	
  Q1	
   $60,000	
  
Geophysics	
   2015	
  Q1-­‐Q2	
   $175,000	
  
Geology	
  /	
  Geochemistry	
   2015	
  Q1-­‐Q4	
   $330,000	
  
LogisJcs	
  &	
  Admin	
  Support	
   2015	
  Q1-­‐Q4	
   131,500	
  
Diamond	
  Drilling	
   2015	
  Q2-­‐Q3	
   $0	
  
ConJngency	
  (10%)	
   2015	
  Q1-­‐Q4	
   $78,650	
  
TOTAL	
   $865,150	
  
17
PHASE 2: WERNER LAKE
GOALS, PROJECTIONS &
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS
TASK	
   STATUS	
   FUNDING	
  
REQUIREMENT	
  
Project	
  Management	
  /	
  Data	
  CompilaJon	
   2016	
  Q1-­‐Q4	
   $90,000	
  
Land	
  AcquisiJon	
  –	
  Staking	
   -­‐	
   $0	
  
Geophysics	
   2016	
  Q1-­‐Q2	
   $55,000	
  
Geology	
  /	
  Geochemistry	
   2016	
  Q3-­‐Q4	
   $236,000	
  
LogisJcs	
  &	
  Admin	
  Support	
   2016	
  Q2-­‐Q3	
   $87,000	
  
Diamond	
  Drilling	
   2016	
  Q2-­‐Q3	
   $1,400,000	
  
ConJngency	
  (10%)	
   2016	
  Q1-­‐Q4	
   $186,800	
  
TOTAL	
   $2,054,800	
  
18
A FOOTHOLD IN THE
FAMED IDAHO COBALT BELT
	
  
	
  
	
  
•  The	
  Iron	
  Creek	
  project	
  provides	
  Global	
  Cobalt	
  
with	
  a	
  foothold	
  in	
  the	
  Idaho	
  Cobalt	
  Belt,	
  the	
  
most	
  prolific	
  belt	
  of	
  cobalt	
  mineralisaJon	
  in	
  the	
  
United	
  States.	
  
•  Consists	
  of	
  seven	
  patented	
  mining	
  claims	
  of	
  
approximately	
  118	
  acres	
  located	
  in	
  Lemhi	
  
County	
  about	
  26	
  miles	
  southwest	
  of	
  the	
  town	
  
of	
  Salmon,	
  Idaho.	
  	
  
•  Discovered	
  in	
  the	
  1940’s	
  as	
  a	
  possible	
  iron	
  
deposit,	
  past	
  work	
  by	
  previous	
  operators	
  
idenJfied	
  several	
  zones	
  of	
  cobalt-­‐copper	
  
mineralisaJon.	
  	
  	
  
•  Extensive	
  drilling,	
  sampling,	
  and	
  geologic	
  work	
  
was	
  completed	
  on	
  two	
  of	
  the	
  most	
  promising	
  
areas.	
  	
  
•  Numerous	
  other	
  exploraJon	
  targets	
  have	
  been	
  
idenJfied	
  on	
  the	
  property	
  that	
  have	
  yet	
  to	
  be	
  
fully	
  evaluated.	
  
“The	
  addi)on	
  of	
  Iron	
  Creek	
  into	
  our	
  cobalt	
  project	
  por8olio	
  is	
  exci)ng	
  and	
  diversifies	
  our	
  project	
  mix	
  at	
  
a	
  )me	
  when	
  cobalt	
  is	
  becoming	
  increasingly	
  important	
  in	
  the	
  baAery	
  sector.”	
  
Entrance	
  to	
  ExisJng	
  Adit	
  at	
  Iron	
  Creek	
  
19
IRON CREEK PROJECT
LOCATION
	
  
	
  
	
  
Salmon River Montana
Idaho
Lemhi
County
Custer County
Hwy 75
Hwy 93
Hwy 28
Hwy 93
Challis
Macay
Bear Track
Blackbird
Yellowjacket
Salmon
Cobalt
Miles
200
Iron Creek
Project
Idaho Cobalt
Project
Idaho USA
20
IRON CREEK PROJECT
HIGHLIGHTS
	
  
	
  
	
  
•  The	
  Iron	
  Creek	
  project	
  provides	
  Global	
  Cobalt	
  with	
  a	
  foothold	
  in	
  the	
  Idaho	
  
Cobalt	
  Belt,	
  the	
  most	
  prolific	
  belt	
  of	
  cobalt	
  mineralisaJon	
  in	
  the	
  United	
  
States.	
  
•  Approximately	
  30,000	
  feet	
  of	
  diamond	
  drilling	
  and	
  1,500	
  feet	
  of	
  underground	
  
driying	
  has	
  been	
  completed	
  exploring	
  the	
  project	
  by	
  previous	
  operators.	
  
•  Historic	
  literature	
  defines	
  "two	
  disJnct	
  lenses	
  of	
  cobalt	
  mineralizaJon."	
  	
  
•  The	
  first	
  lens	
  esJmated	
  to	
  contain	
  1,050,000	
  tons	
  grading	
  0.61%	
  cobalt	
  and	
  
0.3%	
  copper	
  and	
  having	
  a	
  strike	
  length	
  of	
  about	
  750	
  feet.	
  	
  
•  A	
  second	
  lens	
  of	
  high-­‐grade	
  cobalt	
  mineralizaJon	
  of	
  	
  229,000	
  tons	
  extends	
  
for	
  600	
  feet	
  of	
  strike	
  length,	
  is	
  deeper	
  than	
  the	
  first	
  lens,	
  and	
  averages	
  about	
  
0.48%	
  Co	
  and	
  0.24%	
  Cu.	
  
•  Historic	
  met	
  work	
  indicates	
  that	
  the	
  project	
  has	
  low	
  arsenic	
  levels	
  that	
  
disJnguishes	
  the	
  project	
  from	
  others	
  in	
  the	
  belt	
  	
  
•  	
  A	
  posiJve	
  as	
  it	
  make	
  potenJal	
  process	
  handling	
  easier	
  and	
  less	
  costly	
  
	
  
*The	
   historical	
   resource	
   esJmates	
   at	
   the	
   Iron	
   Creek	
   Project	
   are	
   not	
   being	
   treated	
   as	
   a	
   mineral	
   reserve	
   or	
   mineral	
   resource.	
   	
   Key	
   assumpJons,	
   parameters,	
   and	
  
methods	
  used	
  to	
  prepare	
  the	
  historical	
  esJmates	
  are	
  not	
  known.	
   	
  A	
  qualified	
  person	
  has	
  not	
  done	
  sufficient	
  work	
  to	
  classify	
  the	
  historical	
  esJmate	
  as	
  a	
  mineral	
  
resource	
  or	
  mineral	
  reserve.	
  	
  AddiJonal	
  drilling	
  and	
  tesJng	
  is	
  required	
  to	
  determine	
  a	
  current	
  classificaJon	
  as	
  a	
  mineral	
  resource	
  or	
  mineral	
  reserve.	
  	
  The	
  Company	
  is	
  
not	
  treaJng	
  the	
  historical	
  informaJon	
  as	
  a	
  current	
  mineral	
  resource	
  or	
  mineral	
  reserve	
  and	
  the	
  reader	
  is	
  cauJoned	
  to	
  not	
  rely	
  upon	
  this	
  data	
  
21
IRON CREEK PROPERTY
GEOLOGICAL COMPILATION
	
  
	
  
	
  
Quartzite
Argillite
Quartzite
Argillite
10 W20 W30 W40 W50 W
0 500
feet
Underground Workings
Drill Hole
Geological Contact
Limits of Sulphide Zone
Tertiary Challis Volcanics
Proterozoic Yellowjacket Fm
Mineralisation
Modified from Ristorcelli 1988
Iron Creek Property
Geological Compilation with Drill Holes
No Name Zone
22
IRON CREEK PROJECT
SIGNIFICANT DRILL INTERCEPTS
	
  
	
  
	
  
7,000 EL
6,600 EL
6,200 EL
Iron Creek Property
Lemhi County, Idaho
No Name Zone: Section 12
Looking West
Significant Drill Intercepts
W-1
0.32% Co, 0.37% Cu
54.0 ft
0.40% Co, 0.30% Cu
85.0 ft
0.25% Co, 0.07% Cu
45.0 ft
0.25% Co, 0.86% Cu
80.0 ft
B-1
IC-16
Phyllite
Quartzite
143’
180’
608’
23
IRON CREEK
GOALS, PROJECTIONS &
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS
TASK	
   STATUS	
   FUNDING	
  
REQUIREMENT	
  
(Es=mated)	
  
CompilaJon	
  of	
  historic	
  data	
  into	
  Technical	
  Report	
   Q4	
  2014/Q1	
  2015	
   $100,000	
  
	
  
Geological	
  Analysis	
  with	
  Supervision	
  	
  
•  Enhance	
  the	
  understanding	
  of	
  the	
  geology	
  and	
  possible	
  
mineralizaJon	
  	
  
Q1	
  2015	
   $100,000	
  
	
  
Geophysical	
  Survey	
  
•  Airborne	
  
•  Ground	
  
Q1	
  2015	
   $250,000	
  
Diamond	
  Drilling	
  
•  IniJal	
  recommendaJon	
  of	
  +/-­‐	
  7,000m	
  to	
  replicate	
  
historical	
  drilling	
  work	
  effort	
  
Q2	
  2015	
   $1,750,000	
  
THE ALTAI: A PRO-MINING
REGION
Kazakhstan	
   Mongolia	
  
China	
  
KARAKUL,	
  Altai	
  Republic	
  
24	
  
Altai	
  Republic,	
  
Russia	
  
THE KARAKUL COBALT
PROJECT
EsJmated	
  values	
  given	
  43-­‐101	
  non-­‐compliant	
  	
  C1+C2	
  Soviet	
  Resource	
  in	
  addiJon	
  to	
  	
  historic	
  	
  equivalent	
  of	
  10%	
  of	
  the	
  P1	
  Soviet	
  defined	
  resource.	
  	
  
•  The	
  Karakul	
  deposit	
  is	
  a	
  
hydrothermal	
  polymetallic	
  
sulphide	
  deposit	
  with	
  elevated	
  
content	
  of	
  cobalt,	
  copper,	
  
tungsten,	
  bismuth	
  and	
  silver	
  
•  At	
  least	
  five	
  parallel	
  north-­‐
south	
  trending	
  structurally	
  
controlled	
  sulphide	
  zones	
  are	
  
delineated	
  by	
  historical	
  
exploraJon	
  works,	
  including	
  
the	
  Western,	
  Eastern,	
  
Southwestern,	
  Northeastern	
  
and	
  Malachite	
  Zones	
  
25
The	
  Karakul	
  Camp	
  
KARAKUL COBALT PROJECT
EARN-IN BY GLOBAL COBALT
EsJmated	
  values	
  given	
  43-­‐101	
  non-­‐compliant	
  	
  C1+C2	
  Soviet	
  Resource	
  in	
  addiJon	
  to	
  	
  historic	
  	
  equivalent	
  of	
  10%	
  of	
  the	
  P1	
  Soviet	
  defined	
  resource.	
  	
  
•  Global	
  Cobalt	
  has	
  an	
  opJon	
  from	
  Imperial	
  
Mining	
  Holding	
  Limited	
  (“IMHL”)	
  to	
  earn	
  
100%	
  of	
  five	
  mineral	
  resource	
  projects	
  
including	
  the	
  following:	
  	
  
•  Karakul	
  Cobalt	
  Project	
  	
  
•  Altai	
  Sister	
  properJes:	
  
o  Kuruozek;	
  Yantau;	
  Toshtuozek	
  and	
  
Olendzhular	
  
•  Enables	
  greater	
  control	
  over	
  a	
  robust	
  project	
  
porvolio	
  
•  Ability	
  to	
  leverage	
  itself	
  for	
  future	
  
opportuniJes	
  
•  ConsideraJon	
  for	
  the	
  OpJon	
  in	
  the	
  
ProperJes	
  includes:	
  
•  ObligaJon	
  to	
  incur	
  minimum	
  cumulaJve	
  
expenditures	
  (up	
  to	
  $15M)	
  by	
  December	
  
31,	
  2015	
  to	
  earn	
  up	
  to	
  a	
  74.9%	
  interest	
  
in	
  the	
  properJes	
  
26
Drill	
  Rig	
  at	
  Karakul	
  
27
YEAR ROUND ACCESS
KARAKUL ESTIMATES
28	
  
The	
  current	
  size,	
  scale	
  and	
  potenJal	
  of	
  Karakul	
  makes	
  it	
  one	
  of	
  the	
  largest	
  
known	
  primary	
  sources	
  of	
  the	
  strategic	
  metal	
  cobalt	
  globally.	
  	
  
Global Cobalt Corporation
NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Karakul Property and Adjacent Satellite Occurrences, Republic of Altai,
Russian Federation
Table 1.1: Summary of Karakul Mineral Resource Statement – By Mineralised Zone, Cut-off Grade of 0.05% Cobalt Equivalent
WAI (June 30, 2014)
Western Zone
Resource
Classification
Rock Type
Tonnes
(Kt)
Density
Co
(%)
Bi
(%)
Cu
(%)
WO3
(%)
Ag
(g/t)
CoEq
(%)
Contained Metal
CoEq (t)
Co (t) Bi (t) Cu (t) WO3 (t) Ag (t)
Indicated Oxide 981.01 2.56 0.024 0.068 0.269 0.096 0.87 0.257 230.88 664.67 2,640.99 940.51 0.85 2,525.87
Indicated Sulphide 17,156.33 2.96 0.113 0.057 0.362 0.056 3.13 0.318 19,449.50 9,753.72 62,146.50 9,629.98 53.71 54,480.66
Total Indicated Oxide+Sulphide 18,137.34 0.109 0.057 0.357 0.058 3.01 0.314 19,680.38 10,418.39 64,787.49 10,570.49 54.56 57,006.53
Inferred Oxide 17.82 2.56 0.007 0.001 0.067 0.037 0.00 0.069 1.19 0.22 12.00 6.57 0.00 12.34
Inferred Sulphide 2,915.63 3.11 0.096 0.107 0.325 0.053 4.48 0.326 2,792.06 3,131.74 9,467.09 1,532.24 13.07 9,509.79
Total Inferred Oxide+Sulphide 2,933.45 0.095 0.107 0.323 0.052 4.46 0.325 2,793.25 3,131.96 9,479.09 1,538.81 13.07 9,522.13
Eastern Zone
Inferred Oxide 147.26 2.56 0.034 0.061 0.211 0.102 3.08 0.261 49.54 89.36 311.16 150.84 0.45 384.91
Inferred Sulphide 5,971.10 2.89 0.078 0.066 0.218 0.045 1.80 0.237 4,636.72 3,939.70 13,001.47 2,690.20 10.73 14,167.84
Total Inferred Oxide+Sulphide 6,118.36 0.077 0.066 0.218 0.046 1.83 0.238 4,686.26 4,029.07 13,312.63 2,841.04 11.18 14,552.75
Notes:
1. Mineral Resources are not reserves until they have demonstrated economic viability based on a feasibility study or pre-feasibility study;
2. Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of any reserves;
3. Grade represents estimated contained metal in the ground and has not been adjusted for metallurgical recovery;
4. No additional mining factors applied and;
5. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
6. Co Equivalent calculated based on the following parameters assuming 100% recovery:
Metals US$/lb (USD$/0z) US$/tonne CoEq factor
Co 13.608 30,000 1
Cu 3.266 7,200 0.2400
Bi 9.888 21,800 0.7267
WO3 16.783 37,000 1.2333
Ag 20 0.6430 0.0021
Conversion Factor
lb/kg g/troy oz
2204.623 31.10348
Factor
22.0462
DISTRICT STRATEGY
29	
  
•  Proximity	
  of	
  Altai	
  Sister	
  ProperJes	
  to	
  
Karakul	
  adds	
  the	
  possibility	
  of	
  addiJonal	
  
resources	
  within	
  20km	
  of	
  Karakul	
  
•  Provides	
  significant	
  upside	
  to	
  the	
  
creaJon	
  of	
  a	
  new	
  mining	
  jurisdicJon	
  in	
  
the	
  Altai	
  region	
  
•  Kuruozek:	
  	
  
•  Extension	
  of	
  the	
  Karakul	
  
mineralizing	
  system	
  less	
  than	
  5km	
  
from	
  the	
  adit	
  area	
  
•  Olendzhular	
  &	
  Toshtuozek:	
  
•  Excellent	
  tungsten	
  values	
  and	
  
copper	
  mineralizaJon	
  exposed	
  in	
  
surface	
  trenching	
  
•  Yantau:	
  	
  
•  Preliminary	
  sampling	
  idenJfied	
  two	
  
areas	
  of	
  anomalous	
  silver	
  over	
  
Eastern	
  Zone	
   29	
  
JUNIOR RESOURCE COMPANY
WITH MAJOR PARTNERS
EsJmated	
  values	
  given	
  43-­‐101	
  non-­‐compliant	
  	
  C1+C2	
  Soviet	
  Resource	
  in	
  addiJon	
  to	
  	
  historic	
  	
  equivalent	
  of	
  10%	
  of	
  the	
  P1	
  Soviet	
  defined	
  resource.	
  	
  
30	
  
“Con$nue	
  to	
  build	
  a	
  significant	
  enterprise	
  in	
  coopera$on	
  with	
  
influen$al	
  and	
  strong	
  partners”	
  
Beijing	
  General	
  Research	
  Ins$tute	
  of	
  Mining	
  &	
  Metallurgy	
  (BGRIMM):	
  will	
  act	
  as	
  
engineering,	
  procurement	
  and	
  construcJon	
  contractor	
  and	
  develop	
  a	
  project	
  
assessment	
  for	
  markeJng	
  solely	
  in	
  the	
  China	
  
Beijing	
  Easpring	
  Material	
  &	
  Technology	
  Co.	
  (Easpring):	
  preliminary	
  off-­‐take	
  
agreement	
  in	
  place	
  with	
  Easpring,	
  a	
  leading	
  specialized	
  supplier	
  of	
  cathode	
  
material	
  for	
  lithium-­‐ion	
  baueries	
  to	
  industry	
  giants	
  such	
  as	
  Samsung,	
  Sony,	
  
Panasonic,	
  and	
  BYD	
  
CITIC	
  Merchant	
  Bank:	
  provide	
  relaJonships	
  into	
  CITIC	
  Capital	
  and	
  other	
  Chinese	
  
SOEs	
  
European	
  Bank	
  for	
  Reconstruc$on	
  and	
  Development	
  (EBRD):	
  is	
  a	
  current	
  
shareholder	
  of	
  Global	
  Cobalt	
  and	
  will	
  conJnue	
  to	
  provide	
  vital	
  financial	
  and	
  
poliJcal	
  input	
  
The	
  Russian	
  Federa$on:	
  approved	
  the	
  foreign	
  bid	
  for	
  a	
  strategic	
  asset,	
  granted	
  an	
  
open	
  pit	
  permit,	
  and	
  commiued	
  along	
  with	
  the	
  Altai	
  Republic	
  CDN	
  $440M	
  for	
  
local	
  infrastructure	
  with	
  Karakul	
  as	
  the	
  pilot	
  project	
  
31
Ms.	
  Erin	
  Chu`er,	
  President	
  &	
  CEO,	
  Director	
  
•  President	
  and	
  CEO	
  of	
  Global	
  Cobalt;	
  founded	
  as	
  Puget	
  Ventures	
  in	
  2007.	
  
•  Prior	
  to	
  founding	
  Puget,	
  Ms.	
  Chuuer	
  worked	
  for	
  PlaJnum	
  Group	
  Metals,	
  Mag	
  Silver,	
  West	
  Timmins	
  Mining.	
  
•  ExperJse	
  in	
  management,	
  finance,	
  M&A,	
  strategy	
  and	
  operaJons.	
  
•  From	
   1992-­‐2001,	
   Ms.	
   Chuuer	
   held	
   various	
   posiJons	
   for	
   federal	
   and	
   provincial	
   government	
   officials,	
   including	
   the	
   Leader	
   of	
   the	
   federal	
  	
  
OpposiJon,	
  Minister	
  of	
  Indian	
  Affairs	
  and	
  Minister	
  of	
  Defence.	
  
•  Ms.	
  Chuuer	
  sits	
  on	
  the	
  Boards	
  of	
  the	
  Canadian	
  Taxpayer's	
  FederaJon	
  and	
  the	
  MacDonald	
  Laurier	
  InsJtute,	
  and	
  is	
  the	
  Chair	
  of	
  the	
  Canada	
  
Eurasian	
  Russia	
  Business	
  AssociaJon,	
  Vancouver	
  Chapter.	
  	
  	
  
•  Ms.	
  Chuuer	
  was	
  recognized	
  with	
  a	
  2011	
  Business	
  in	
  Vancouver	
  “Top	
  40	
  Under	
  40”	
  achievement	
  award.	
  
Mr.	
  Oleg	
  Scherbina,	
  Chief	
  Financial	
  Officer	
  
•  Mr.	
  Scherbina	
  is	
  a	
  financial	
  manager	
  with	
  experience	
  in	
  all	
  aspects	
  of	
  accounJng	
  and	
  financial	
  management.	
  
•  He	
  has	
  direct	
  experience	
  within	
  the	
  mining,	
  construcJon	
  and	
  oil/gas	
  sectors	
  and	
  has	
  been	
  involved	
  with	
  numerous	
  mining	
  companies,	
  
including	
  Uranium	
  One,	
  Eureka	
  Mining	
  Plc	
  and	
  Bema	
  Gold	
  CorporaJon.	
  
•  Currently,	
  Mr.	
  Scherbina	
  is	
  responsible	
  for	
  the	
  development	
  of	
  the	
  accounJng	
  system	
  for	
  the	
  parent	
  company	
  and	
  subsidiary	
  companies	
  of	
  
Global	
  Cobalt,	
  as	
  well	
  as	
  for	
  day-­‐to-­‐day	
  financial	
  operaJons	
  of	
  the	
  company,	
  including	
  contract	
  review,	
  payroll,	
  budgeJng	
  and	
  financial	
  
control	
  development.	
  
•  Mr.	
  Scherbina	
  is	
  fluent	
  in	
  English,	
  Russian	
  and	
  Ukrainian	
  and	
  as	
  such	
  played	
  an	
  important	
  role	
  in	
  the	
  coordinaJon	
  and	
  execuJon	
  of	
  all	
  
finance-­‐related	
   acJviJes	
   of	
   the	
   Bema	
   Gold	
   and	
   Eureka	
   Mining	
   operaJons	
   in	
   Russia,	
   while	
   also	
   managing	
   administraJve	
   and	
   human	
  
resources	
  funcJons.	
  
Mr.	
  Paul	
  Sarjeant,	
  P.Geo,	
  VP	
  Explora=on	
  
•  Mr.	
  Sarjeant,	
  P.	
  Geo,	
  has	
  extensive	
  exploraJon,	
  project	
  evaluaJon	
  and	
  acquisiJon	
  experience	
  both	
  in	
  Canada	
  and	
  internaJonally	
  and	
  has	
  
developed	
  a	
  solid	
  background	
  in	
  company	
  management	
  through	
  various	
  execuJve	
  management	
  posiJons	
  with	
  several	
  publicly	
  traded	
  junior	
  
resource	
  companies.	
  	
  
•  Mr.	
  Sarjeant	
  began	
  his	
  career	
  with	
  Echo	
  Bay	
  Mines	
  Ltd.	
  as	
  a	
  project	
  geologist	
  working	
  on	
  projects	
  in	
  the	
  NWT,	
  Archean	
  greenstone	
  belts,	
  
Lupin	
  Mine	
  peripheral	
  project,	
  and	
  skarn	
  properJes	
  in	
  BC	
  and	
  Ecuador.	
  	
  
•  He	
  was	
  appointed	
  Senior	
  Geologist,	
  InternaJonal	
  ExploraJon	
  Group,	
  responsible	
  for	
  project	
  evaluaJon	
  outside	
  of	
  North	
  America,	
  including	
  
precious	
  and	
  base	
  metals	
  projects	
  in	
  South	
  America,	
  East	
  Africa,	
  South	
  East	
  Asia,	
  Russia,	
  Mongolia,	
  Australia,	
  New	
  Zealand	
  and	
  Europe.	
  
	
  
	
  
FOCUSED & MOTIVATED
32
Mr.	
  Mitchell	
  Smith,	
  Corporate	
  Development	
  
•  Mr.	
  Smith	
  has	
  over	
  10	
  years	
  of	
  experience	
  in	
  senior	
  management	
  roles	
  encompassing	
  markeJng,	
  sales,	
  shareholder	
  relaJons,	
  corporate	
  
communicaJons,	
  public	
  relaJons	
  and	
  business	
  development.	
  	
  
•  Mr.	
  Smith	
  began	
  his	
  career	
  in	
  the	
  mining	
  sector	
  in	
  2007,	
  tenured	
  with	
  the	
  Petaquilla	
  Group	
  of	
  Companies	
  (Petaquilla	
  Minerals	
  TSX:PTQ	
  and	
  
Petaquilla	
   Copper	
   (TSX:PTC))	
   (nowFirst	
   Quantum’s	
   Cobre	
   Panama	
   project)	
   where	
   he	
   worked	
   in	
   shareholders	
   relaJons	
   and	
   managed	
  
communicaJons	
  between	
  the	
  Vancouver	
  and	
  Panama	
  headquarters.	
  
•  Mr.	
  Smith	
  is	
  responsible	
  for	
  developing,	
  implemenJng	
  and	
  execuJng	
  all	
  aspects	
  of	
  Global	
  Cobalt’s	
  corporate	
  development	
  acJviJes	
  in	
  its	
  
transformaJon	
  from	
  Puget	
  Ventures	
  Inc.	
  
•  Mr.	
  Smith	
  sits	
  on	
  the	
  Editorial	
  Board	
  of	
  the	
  AssociaJon	
  of	
  Mineral	
  ExploraJon	
  BriJsh	
  Columbia	
  (AMEBC),	
  an	
  industry	
  advocate	
  organizaJon	
  
for	
  successful	
  and	
  responsible	
  mineral	
  exploraJon	
  &	
  development	
  and	
  the	
  predominant	
  voice	
  of	
  mineral	
  exploraJon	
  and	
  development	
  in	
  
BriJsh	
  Columbia.	
  
	
  	
  	
  
Mr.	
  Graham	
  Abbo`,	
  Shareholder	
  Rela=ons	
  
•  Mr.	
  Abbou	
  has	
  12	
  years	
  of	
  corporate	
  experience	
  with	
  Telus,	
  with	
  involvement	
  in	
  business	
  sales,	
  operaJons	
  and	
  team	
  management	
  and	
  
responsibility	
  for	
  mulJ-­‐million	
  dollar	
  transacJons.	
  
•  In-­‐depth	
  experience	
  with	
  long-­‐cycle	
  corporate	
  deal	
  development	
  and	
  complex	
  relaJonship	
  management.	
  
•  Involvement	
  with	
  several	
  public	
  companies	
  in	
  business	
  and	
  corporate	
  development	
  (both	
  strategic	
  and	
  financial),	
  operaJons	
  management	
  
and	
  shareholders	
  relaJons	
  acJviJes.	
  
•  Key	
  member	
  of	
  team	
  responsible	
  for	
  consolidaJng	
  and	
  finalizing	
  the	
  Salares	
  Lithium	
  property	
  package	
  into	
  the	
  publicly	
  listed	
  company	
  that	
  
became	
  Talison	
  Lithium.	
  Talison	
  Lithium	
  was	
  acquired	
  for	
  over	
  $750M	
  in	
  the	
  first	
  quarter	
  2013.	
  
	
  	
  
Mr.	
  Jaime	
  Stallwood,	
  Shareholder	
  Rela=ons	
  
•  30	
  years	
  entrepreneurial	
  experience	
  managing	
  companies	
  from	
  early	
  stage	
  development	
  to	
  mulJ-­‐million	
  dollar	
  NASDAQ	
  listed	
  companies	
  
on	
  both	
  the	
  operaJons	
  and	
  corporate	
  levels.	
  
•  Managed	
  a	
  naJonal	
  sales	
  force	
  in	
  excess	
  of	
  200	
  salespeople	
  for	
  a	
  naJonal	
  Telecom	
  Provider	
  while	
  at	
  the	
  same	
  Jme	
  implemenJng	
  naJonal	
  
consumer	
  markeJng	
  and	
  iniJaJves.	
  
•  Key	
  involvement	
  with	
  LML	
  Payment	
  Systems	
  (a	
  NASDAQ	
  listed	
  company)	
  that	
  was	
  sold	
  for	
  $110M	
  in	
  first	
  quarter	
  of	
  2013.	
  
•  Has	
  parJcipated	
  in	
  numerous	
  M&A	
  transacJons	
  as	
  well	
  as	
  subsequent	
  integraJon,	
  uJlizaJon	
  and	
  markeJng	
  acJviJes.	
  
	
  
	
  
FOCUSED & MOTIVATED
33
BOARD	
  OF	
  DIRECTORS:	
  	
  	
  
Mr.	
  Gaston	
  Reymenants,	
  Director	
  Global	
  Cobalt	
  
•  DisJnguished	
  career	
  in	
  mining,	
  smelJng,	
  refining	
  and	
  metal	
  trading	
  spans	
  over	
  forty	
  years,	
  during	
  which,	
  he	
  was	
  also	
  responsible	
  for	
  the	
  financing	
  of	
  
several	
  off-­‐take	
  projects	
  in	
  Australia,	
  China	
  and	
  the	
  Americas.	
  	
  	
  
•  Served	
  over	
  20	
  years	
  with	
  Falconbridge	
  InternaJonal	
  in	
  various	
  managerial	
  posiJons	
  and	
  was	
  part	
  of	
  the	
  joint	
  venture	
  with	
  Norilsk	
  Kombinat.	
  	
  	
  
•  Was	
  managing	
  director	
  of	
  Kola	
  InternaJonal	
  Murmansk,	
  and	
  held	
  director	
  and/or	
  senior	
  managerial	
  posiJons	
  with	
  several	
  companies	
  with	
  cobalt	
  assets	
  
including	
  Baja	
  Mining,	
  Polymet	
  Mining	
  and	
  KCM.	
  
•  Mr.	
  Reymenants’s	
  wealth	
  of	
  knowledge	
  in	
  the	
  cobalt	
  and	
  industrial	
  metals	
  sectors	
  will	
  prove	
  an	
  excellent	
  resource	
  to	
  Global	
  Cobalt.	
  
	
  	
  
Mr.	
  Jean-­‐Pierre	
  Colin,	
  Director	
  Global	
  Cobalt	
  
•  Mr.	
   Colin	
   is	
   a	
   mining	
   execuJve	
   who	
   provides	
   corporate	
   strategy	
   consulJng	
   services	
   to	
   boards	
   and	
   shareholders	
   of	
   high	
   profile	
   internaJonal	
   mining	
  
companies	
  and	
  was	
  was	
  an	
  investment	
  banker,	
  leading	
  corporate	
  finance	
  and	
  M&A	
  departments	
  of	
  several	
  securiJes	
  brokerage	
  houses	
  in	
  Canada.	
  
•  He	
  is	
  a	
  Director	
  of	
  Premier	
  Gold	
  Mines	
  (TSX:PG),	
  Director	
  of	
  Xmet	
  Inc.	
  (TSX.V:XME)	
  and	
  is	
  special	
  advisor	
  to	
  the	
  ExecuJve	
  Chairman	
  and	
  Board	
  of	
  BlackRock	
  
Metals	
  Inc.	
  
•  He	
  is	
  the	
  former	
  Faculty	
  of	
  Arts	
  Co-­‐Chair	
  of	
  the	
  Waterloo	
  Advisory	
  Council,	
  founder	
  of	
  Caratax	
  Management	
  Ltd.,	
  a	
  manager	
  of	
  public	
  flow-­‐through	
  share	
  
limited	
  partnerships,	
  and	
  a	
  former	
  director	
  of	
  Wolfden	
  Resources	
  Inc.,	
  Pelangio	
  Mines	
  Inc.,	
  Virginia	
  Gold	
  Mines	
  Inc.,	
  and	
  NIM	
  Management,	
  the	
  manager	
  
of	
  over	
  $730	
  million	
  of	
  flow-­‐through	
  funds.	
  	
  
•  Mr.	
  Colin	
  is	
  a	
  Member	
  of	
  the	
  Bar	
  of	
  the	
  Province	
  of	
  Quebec	
  and	
  holds	
  a	
  Master	
  of	
  Business	
  AdministraJon	
  from	
  the	
  University	
  of	
  Western	
  Ontario,	
  a	
  Civil	
  
Law	
  Degree	
  from	
  the	
  University	
  of	
  Ouawa	
  and	
  a	
  CerJficate	
  in	
  ComparaJve	
  Law	
  from	
  the	
  University	
  of	
  Manitoba.	
  
	
  	
  
Mr.	
  Alexander	
  Ordanian,	
  Director	
  Global	
  Cobalt	
  
•  Mr.	
   Ordanian's	
   experience	
   in	
   the	
   mineral,	
   construcJon	
   development	
   and	
   investment	
   industry,	
   specializing	
   in	
   corporate	
   finance,	
   capital	
   markets	
   and	
  
private	
  business,	
  spans	
  well	
  over	
  twenty	
  years.	
  	
  
•  He	
  has	
  a	
  vast	
  experience	
  with	
  emerging	
  markets	
  parJcularly	
  in	
  the	
  Russian	
  FederaJon	
  and	
  CIS	
  countries	
  as	
  well	
  as	
  in	
  Central	
  and	
  Eastern	
  Europe.	
  
•  He	
  has	
  operated	
  and	
  been	
  associated	
  with	
  various	
  board	
  and	
  senior	
  management	
  teams,	
  and	
  successfully	
  managed	
  the	
  chief	
  execuJve	
  funcJon	
  for	
  a	
  
holding	
  group	
  of	
  companies	
  with	
  mulJple	
  business	
  streams.	
  
•  During	
  his	
  highly	
  respected	
  career	
  he	
  worked	
  on	
  key	
  merger	
  and	
  acquisiJon	
  transacJons	
  with	
  a	
  number	
  of	
  major	
  internaJonal	
  companies	
  including	
  Mobil,	
  
BriJsh	
  Petroleum	
  and	
  Shell.	
  	
  
•  Currently,	
  Mr.	
  Ordanian	
  is	
  a	
  member	
  of	
  the	
  Board	
  of	
  Directors	
  of	
  Imperial	
  Mining	
  Holding	
  Limited	
  and	
  one	
  of	
  the	
  directors	
  of	
  a	
  North	
  American	
  merchant	
  
services	
  company.	
  
	
  
DEDICATED & EXPERIENCED
34
BOARD	
  OF	
  DIRECTORS	
  CONTINUED:	
  	
  	
  
	
  	
  
Mr.	
  Peter	
  Reynolds,	
  Director	
  Global	
  Cobalt	
  
•  Mr.	
  Reynolds	
  is	
  engaged	
  by	
  EBRD	
  to	
  carry	
  out	
  reviews	
  of	
  EBRD's	
  investments	
  for	
  several	
  projects	
  in	
  Mongolia	
  and	
  Russia	
  and	
  was	
  previously	
  the	
  EBRD's	
  nominated	
  
Director	
  on	
  the	
  Board	
  of	
  IMHL.	
  
•  Nearly	
  40	
  years	
  in	
  the	
  minerals	
  industry,	
  with	
  high-­‐level	
  experience	
  at	
  various	
  mines	
  including	
  being	
  former	
  Manager	
  of	
  OperaJons	
  Planning	
  &	
  Mine	
  Projects/Manager	
  
Mine	
  Business	
  Improvement	
  at	
  Olympic	
  Dam	
  and	
  was	
  former	
  Managing	
  Director	
  Marlborough	
  Resources	
  as	
  well	
  as	
  Mining	
  Engineer	
  Normandy	
  Mining.	
  
	
  
Mr.	
  Ray	
  Castelli,	
  Director	
  Global	
  Cobalt	
  
•  Mr.	
  Castelli	
  was	
  appointed	
  CEO	
  of	
  Weatherhaven,	
  one	
  of	
  the	
  world's	
  leading	
  manufacturers	
  of	
  redeploy	
  able	
  camps	
  and	
  shelter	
  systems,	
  in	
  January	
  2008.	
  
•  Weatherhaven	
  has	
  grown	
  to	
  become	
  a	
  key	
  supplier	
  to	
  the	
  Canadian,	
  US,	
  Australian	
  and	
  NATO	
  armed	
  forces,	
  numerous	
  resource	
  exploraJon	
  companies	
  as	
  well	
  as	
  the	
  
United	
  NaJons	
  and	
  other	
  disaster	
  and	
  humanitarian	
  relief	
  agencies.	
  
•  Mr.	
  Castelli	
  was	
  co-­‐founder	
  and	
  Senior	
  Vice	
  President	
  of	
  Quadrem,	
  a	
  Dallas-­‐based	
  global	
  supply	
  chain	
  and	
  e-­‐procurement	
  company,	
  serving	
  19	
  of	
  the	
  world's	
  largest	
  
natural	
  resource	
  companies,	
  including	
  Rio	
  Tinto,	
  BHP	
  Billiton,	
  Alcan	
  and	
  Inco.	
  His	
  role	
  was	
  to	
  build	
  the	
  global	
  organizaJon	
  and	
  product	
  set	
  for	
  this	
  e-­‐business	
  pioneer.	
  
•  Mr.	
  Castelli	
  joined	
  Alcan	
  in	
  1995	
  following	
  business	
  school	
  in	
  Europe.	
  He	
  was	
  promoted	
  to	
  Alcan's	
  Montreal	
  headquarters	
  in	
  1997	
  as	
  Director	
  of	
  Strategic	
  Planning.	
  
	
  	
  
Mr.	
  Kamen	
  Zahariev,	
  Director	
  Global	
  Cobalt	
  
•  Mr.	
  Zahariev	
  is	
  a	
  highly	
  respected	
  and	
  experienced	
  internaJonal	
  debt	
  and	
  equity	
  finance	
  and	
  investment	
  professional	
  with	
  parJcular	
  emphasis	
  on	
  Emerging	
  Markets	
  and	
  
Central	
  and	
  Eastern	
  Europe.	
  	
  
•  Currently,	
  Mr.	
  Zahariev	
  is	
  a	
  member	
  of	
  the	
  investment	
  commiuee	
  at	
  CEE	
  Special	
  SituaJon	
  Fund	
  and	
  is	
  a	
  Director	
  overseeing	
  the	
  team	
  responsible	
  for	
  European	
  Bank	
  for	
  
ReconstrucJon	
  and	
  Development's	
  (the	
  EBRD)	
  significant	
  porvolio	
  of	
  restructuring	
  projects	
  throughout	
  Central	
  and	
  Eastern	
  Europe.	
  	
  	
  
•  He	
  has	
  extensive	
  experience	
  as	
  non-­‐execuJve	
  member	
  of	
  the	
  board	
  of	
  investee	
  companies	
  and	
  senior	
  advisor	
  of	
  investment	
  funds	
  in	
  the	
  region.	
  
•  In	
  the	
  last	
  15	
  years	
  Kamen	
  Zahariev	
  has	
  parJcipated	
  in	
  over	
  50	
  significant	
  transacJons	
  including	
  project	
  finance,	
  M&A,	
  private	
  equity	
  and	
  workouts.	
  
•  He	
  is	
  member	
  on	
  the	
  supervisory	
  board	
  at	
  Prista	
  Oil	
  B.V.	
  	
  Group,	
  is	
  a	
  member	
  of	
  the	
  BriJsh	
  InsJtute	
  of	
  Directors	
  and	
  is	
  also	
  associated	
  with	
  several	
  business	
  organizaJons	
  
with	
  interests	
  in	
  Eastern	
  Europe.	
  
Mr.	
  Marc	
  Thomas,	
  Director	
  Global	
  Cobalt	
  
•  Mr.	
  Thomas,	
  P.Eng	
  is	
  an	
  EU	
  NaJonal	
  who	
  is	
  fluent	
  in	
  Russian	
  and	
  has	
  worked	
  and	
  traveled	
  extensively	
  throughout	
  Russia	
  &	
  the	
  former	
  CIS	
  countries	
  for	
  the	
  past	
  15	
  years.	
  
•  He	
  is	
  currently	
  the	
  General	
  Director	
  and	
  Partner	
  in	
  IST,	
  a	
  technology	
  company	
  represenJng	
  European	
  and	
  American	
  industrial	
  equipment	
  in	
  the	
  Russian	
  marketplace	
  and	
  
serves	
  as	
  Director	
  at	
  Imperial	
  Mining	
  Holding	
  Limited.	
  
•  He	
  has	
  served	
  in	
  a	
  series	
  of	
  leadership	
  roles	
  of	
  increasing	
  responsibility	
  and	
  is	
  a	
  high	
  performing	
  leader,	
  with	
  strategic	
  and	
  commercial	
  acumen	
  obtained	
  from	
  start-­‐ups	
  
and	
  business	
  development	
  in	
  blue	
  chip	
  and	
  fast	
  growth	
  Russian	
  companies.	
  
•  Mr.	
  Thomas	
  has	
  also	
  been	
  involved	
  with	
  three	
  corporate	
  re-­‐structurings	
  in	
  the	
  natural	
  resource	
  sector.	
  He	
  holds	
  an	
  MBA	
  from	
  INSEAD	
  (France)	
  and	
  a	
  BSc.,	
  Engineering	
  
from	
  the	
  Colorado	
  School	
  of	
  Mines.	
  
	
  
DEDICATED & EXPERIENCED
SUMMARY
EsJmated	
  values	
  given	
  43-­‐101	
  non-­‐compliant	
  	
  C1+C2	
  Soviet	
  Resource	
  in	
  addiJon	
  to	
  	
  historic	
  	
  equivalent	
  of	
  10%	
  of	
  the	
  P1	
  Soviet	
  defined	
  resource.	
  	
  
35	
  
VISION:	
  	
  Achieve	
  growth	
  as	
  a	
  leading	
  strategic	
  metals	
  group	
  and	
  
enhance	
  overall	
  value	
  for	
  shareholders	
  
STRATEGY:	
  Balanced	
  and	
  flexible	
  combinaJon	
  of	
  enhancing	
  exisJng	
  
assets,	
  organic	
  growth	
  and	
  strategic	
  acquisiJons	
  
PARTNERSHIPS:	
  ConJnue	
  to	
  build	
  a	
  significant	
  enterprise	
  in	
  
cooperaJon	
  with	
  influenJal	
  and	
  strong	
  partners	
  
ASSETS:	
  Develop	
  exisJng	
  resources	
  and	
  expand	
  asset	
  porvolio	
  &	
  
footprint	
  in	
  the	
  natural	
  resources	
  sector,	
  regionally	
  and	
  worldwide	
  
LEADERSHIP:	
  Engaged	
  to	
  the	
  central	
  vision	
  of	
  advancing	
  the	
  porvolio	
  
of	
  quality	
  assets	
  to	
  ensure	
  corporate	
  growth	
  &	
  valuaJon	
  
36	
  
Global Cobalt Corporation
TSX.V:GCO
OTCBB:GLBCF
FRA: 3P0
Suite 1501-128 West Pender Street
Vancouver, BC,V6B 1R8, Canada
T. (604) 688-4219
F. (604) 688-4215
info@globalcobaltcorp.com
www.GlobalCobaltCorp.com
Twitter @GlobalCobalt
“Powered	
  by	
  Cobalt”	
  
36	
  
EXPLORE	
  
DEVELOP	
  
ACQUIRE	
  
LEAD	
   37	
  

TSXV:GCO Corporate Presentation March 2015

  • 1.
        Global  Cobalt  Corp.         “Powered  by  Cobalt”                                 TSXV:GCO,  OTCBB:GLBCF,  FRA:3P0   DEVELOPING     VALUE  
  • 2.
    Regarding  Forward-­‐Looking  Statements   This  presentaJon  includes  certain  “forward-­‐looking  statements”  and  “forward-­‐looking  informaJon”  within  the  meaning  of  applicable  securiJes  laws,  concerning  the  business,  operaJons  and   financial  performance  and  condiJon  of  the  Company.    All  statements,  other  than  statements  of  historical  fact,  are  forward-­‐looking  statements.    Forward-­‐looking  statements  are  frequently,  but   not  always,  idenJfied  by  words  such  as  “plans”,  “expects”,  “anJcipates”,  “believes”,  “intends”,  “esJmates”,  “potenJal”,  “possible”  and  similar  expressions,  or  statements  that  events,  condiJons   or  results  “will”,  “may”,  “could”,  or  “should”  occur  or  be  achieved.    Forward-­‐looking  statements  contained  in  this  presentaJon  include  statements  with  respect  to:  expectaJons  regarding  the   potenJal  mineralizaJon  and  geological  merits  of  the  Company’s  projects,  including  the  Karakul  Project  and  the  Werner  Lake  Project;  the  Company’s  goals  regarding  development  of  the  Karakul   Project  and  regarding  raising  capital  and  conducJng  further  exploraJon  and  development  of  its  projects;  the  Company’s  proposed  plans  for  advancing  its  projects,  including  drilling  and  other   exploraJon  work;  expectaJons  regarding  the  conJnuity  of  mineral  deposits,  including  in  relaJon  to  adjacent  or  other  properJes  (including  producing  or  past-­‐producing  properJes)  that  are  in  the   vicinity  or  same  region  as  the  Company’s  projects;  expectaJons  regarding  any  environmental  issues  that  may  affect  planned  or  future  exploitaJon  and  exploraJon  programs;  mineral  exploitaJon   and  exploraJon  program  cost  esJmates;  statements  with  respect  to  the  future  price  of  cobalt  and  other  metals;  Jming  and  compleJon  of  geological  studies  and  reports;  receipt  and  Jming  of  the   necessary  exploitaJon  permits  and  other  third  party  approvals;  and  government  regulaJon  of  mineral  exploraJon  and  development  operaJons  in  Russia.    EsJmates  of  mineral  resources  and   mineral  reserves  may  also  consJtute  forward-­‐looking  statements  and  informaJon  in  that  they  represent  esJmates  of  mineralizaJon  that  may  be  encountered  if  mining  is  commenced,  and/or   economic  viability  of  such  mineralizaJon.   Forward-­‐looking  statements  involve  various  risks  and  uncertainJes.    There  can  be  no  assurance  that  such  statements  will  prove  to  be  accurate,  and  actual  results  and  future  events  could  differ   materially  from  those  anJcipated  in  such  statements.    Important  factors  that  could  cause  actual  results  to  differ  materially  from  our  expectaJons  include  the  uncertainJes  involving  the  need  for   addiJonal  financing  to  explore  and  develop  properJes  and  availability  of  financing  in  the  debt  and  capital  markets;  uncertainJes  involved  in  the  interpretaJon  of  drilling  results  and  geological   tests  and  the  esJmaJon  of  reserves  and  resources;  the  need  for  cooperaJon  of  government  agencies  and  naJve  groups  in  the  development  and  operaJon  of  properJes;  the  need  to  obtain   permits   and   governmental   approvals;   risks   of   construcJon   and   mining   projects   such   as   accidents,   equipment   breakdowns,   bad   weather,   non-­‐compliance   with   environmental   and   permit   requirements,  unanJcipated  variaJon  in  geological  structures,  ore  grades  or  recovery  rates;  unexpected  cost  increases;  fluctuaJons  in  metal  prices  and  currency  exchange  rates;  the  impact  of   economic  sancJons  on  companies  conducJng  business  in  Russia;  and  other  risk  and  uncertainJes  disclosed  in  reports  and  documents  filed  by  the  Company  with  applicable  securiJes  regulatory   authoriJes  from  Jme  to  Jme.    The  forward-­‐looking  statements  made  herein  reflect  the  Company’s  beliefs,  opinions  and  projecJons  on  the  date  the  statements  are  made.    Except  as  required  by   law,  the  Company  assumes  no  obligaJon  to  update  the  forward-­‐looking  statements  of  beliefs,  opinions,  projecJons,  or  other  factors,  should  they  change.     Regarding  Historical  Resources   Note  that  the  C1  and  C2    resource  esJmates  shown  are  historical  in  nature  and  do  not  use  categories  defined  in  Canadian  NaJonal  Instrument  43-­‐101  Standards  of  Disclosure  for  Mineral  Projects   (“NI  43-­‐101”)  and  accordingly  are  not  compliant  with  NI  43-­‐101  or  Canadian  InsJtute  of  Mining,  Metallurgy  and  Petroleum  (“CIM”)  standards.    [The  exact  date  of  these  es=mates  is  unknown].   Historical  resource  esJmates  are  based  on  the  Russian  reserve  system  and  based  primarily  on  trench  and  prospecJng  samples  only.    These  resources  are  considered  historical  in  nature  under  NI   43-­‐101  and  a  qualified  person  under  NI  43-­‐101  has  not  done  sufficient  work  to  classify  the  historical  esJmate  as  current  mineral  resources.    The  Company  is  not  treaJng  the  historical  esJmate  as   current  mineral  resources.     Regarding  Mineral  Reserve  and  Resource  Es=mates   Unless  otherwise  indicated,  all  reserve  and  resource  esJmates  included  in  this  presentaJon  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  NI  43-­‐101  and  CIM  standards.    Canadian  standards,  including   NI   43-­‐101,   differ   significantly   from   the   requirements   of   the   United   States   SecuriJes   and   Exchange   Commissions   ,   and   reserve   and   resource   informaJon   in   this   presentaJon   may   not   be   comparable  to  similar  informaJon  disclosed  by  U.S.  companies.    In  parJcular,  and  without  limiJng  the  generality  of  the  foregoing,  the  term  “resource”  does  not  equate  to  the  term  “‘reserves”.     Under   U.S.   standards,   mineralizaJon   may   not   be   classified   as   a   “reserve”   unless   the   determinaJon   has   been   made   that   the   mineralizaJon   could   be   economically   and   legally   produced   or   extracted  at  the  Jme  the  reserve  determinaJon  is  made.     Qualified  Person   Mr.  Paul  Sarjeant,  P.  Geo.,  is  a  Qualified  Person  as  defined  by  NI  43-­‐101.    Mr.  Sarjeant  is  the  Company’s  Vice  President  ExploraJon,  and,  unless  otherwise  indicated,  has  prepared  or  supervised   the  preparaJon  of  the  technical  informaJon  contained  in  this  presentaJon  and/or  reviewed  and  approved  such  disclosure.    For  more  informaJon,  see  the  individual  technical  reports  and  news   releases  available  under  the  Company’s  profile  at  www.sedar.com       All  monetary  amounts  in  this  presentaJon  are  in  Canadian  dollars  unless  otherwise  indicated.   CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS 2  
  • 3.
    Explore market opportunities asthey emerge in various sectors of the strategic metals sector with emphasis on those metals, such as cobalt, used in the rechargeable battery space. 3 STRATEGY OVERVIEW 3  
  • 4.
    MARKET CAPITALIZATION 4   Global  Cobalt  Corp.   TSX-­‐V:GCO   Issued  &  Outstanding   93,758,888   Warrants   14,394,659   OpJons   4,555,000   Fully  Diluted   112,708,547   52  Week  High/Low   $0.14/$0.03   Market  Cap.   $5M   Warrants   Expiry  Date   Issued   Price     Warrant   Descrip=on   Sept.  19,  2015   1,812,060   $0.073   Private   Placement   Nov.  6,  2015   4,181,000   $0.070   Private   Placement   Nov.  25,  2016   2,284,200   $0.065   Private   Placement   Jan.  27,  2017   6,117,399   $0.35   Private   Placement   Stock  Op=ons   Expiry  Date   Issued   Price     Value   CAD  $   Dec.  9,  2018   4,555,000   $0.10   $455,500   IMHL   30%   MANAGEMENT   10%   INSTITUTIONAL   10%   RETAIL   50%   Ownership  Structure  
  • 5.
    “POWERED BY COBALT” EsJmated  values  given  43-­‐101  non-­‐compliant    C1+C2  Soviet  Resource  in  addiJon  to    historic    equivalent  of  10%  of  the  P1  Soviet  defined  resource.     5   LOW  PRICE  +  SUPPLY  RISK  +  GROWING  DEMAND     =  OPPORTUNITY  IN  COBALT   Renewable    Energy       •  Solar  panel  technology   •  Wind  generaJon   (turbines)   •  Energy  storage   Aerospace   Technology  &   Hardened  Steel   •  Jet  engine  turbines  &   military  technology   •  Wear  resistant  &  high   strength  steel  alloys   •  High  speed  steels     •  Magnets   Hybrid  Electric   Vehicle  (HEV)   Baueries     •  EssenJal  component   in  growing   rechargeable  bauery   sector   •  Diminishes  demand   for  fossil  fuels  and   reduces  air  polluJon   Digital Revolution and Electronics •  Mobile phones & smartphones •  Computers & other electronic goods including iPods & iPads •  Integrated circuits 5  
  • 6.
    COBALT & RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES EsJmated  values  given  43-­‐101  non-­‐compliant    C1+C2  Soviet  Resource  in  addiJon  to    historic    equivalent  of  10%  of  the  P1  Soviet  defined  resource.     6   FACT:  Cobalt  chemicals  are  a  criJcal  component  for  rechargeable  baueries   •  The  rechargeable  bauery  market  is  experiencing  rapid  growth  due  to  the  conJnued  proliferaJon  of   portable  electronic  devices.       •  In  addiJon  the  emergence  of  electric  vehicles  is  anJcipated  to  further  boost  the  demand  for  cobalt  in   baueries   •  Bauery  is  the  single  largest  use  of  cobalt  accounJng  for  42%  of  cobalt  demand  and  is  the  primary   driver  of  the  cobalt  market   LITHIUM  COBALT  BATTERIES:  Advanced,  Higher  Energy  Density,  Lighter   Is     Lithium  Cobalt  Oxide  (LCO)   Lithium  Nickel  Manganese  Cobalt  Oxide  (NMC)   Lithium  Nickel  Cobalt  Aluminum  Oxide  (NCA)   60%   Cobalt  by  Weight   10-­‐20%   Cobalt  by  Weight   9%   Cobalt  by  Weight   By  the  Year   2020  COBALT   use  in  bauery   applicaJons  is   esJmated  to  be   greater  than  the   current  enJre   world  market  for   refined  cobalt   Source:  Roskill  
  • 7.
    DRIVING THE DEMAND EsJmated  values  given  43-­‐101  non-­‐compliant    C1+C2  Soviet  Resource  in  addiJon  to    historic    equivalent  of  10%  of  the  P1  Soviet  defined  resource.     7   Ba`ery  Usage  Accounts     for  42%  of  Cobalt  Demand   Nickel-­‐Metal  Hydride   Ba`eries   Lithium-­‐Ion   Ba`eries   Bauery   Usage,   42%   Other,   39%   Super   Alloys,   19%   61%  of  mined  cobalt  is  sourced  from  the  geo-­‐ poliJcally  unstable  D.R.  Congo   China  refines  43%  of  the  world’s  cobalt   Cobalt  is  recognized  as  strategically  important  by   both  the  USA  and  EU  as  it  is  criJcal  to  a  number   metallurgical  and  chemical  products  and  is   suscepJble  to  supply  concerns   1-­‐4kg  of  Cobalt   in  a  Car  Bauery   2-­‐8kg  of  Cobalt   in  a  Car  Bauery   15%   60%  15%  Cobalt  by   Weight   60%  Cobalt  by   Weight   Cobalt   Demand   Source:  Roskill  
  • 8.
    PRICED AT HISTORICLOWS EsJmated  values  given  43-­‐101  non-­‐compliant    C1+C2  Soviet  Resource  in  addiJon  to    historic    equivalent  of  10%  of  the  P1  Soviet  defined  resource.     8   Price forecasts… Roskill price forecasts to 2018 ($/lb) Source: Roskill 0 5 10 15 20 25 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 MB prices Roskill forecasts ! An export ban on DRC concentrates ! New mining code in DRC ! Power disruptions in Africa ! Lower than expected demand in key sectors and applications ! World economic markets falter 16/05/2014 Cobalt free market in warehouse monthly average prices (US$ per lb) Source: Metal Bulletin Historical cobalt prices… $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 Jan-97 Sep-97 May-98 Jan-99 Sep-99 May-00 Jan-01 Sep-01 May-02 Jan-03 Sep-03 May-04 Jan-05 Sep-05 May-06 Jan-07 Sep-07 May-08 Jan-09 Sep-09 May-10 Jan-11 Sep-11 May-12 Jan-13 Sep-13 May-14 Low Price High Price Source:  Roskill  presentaJon  delivered  at  the  Cobalt  Development  InsJtute  Cobalt  Conference  May  21st,  2014    
  • 9.
    THE PROJECT PORTFOLIO EsJmated  values  given  43-­‐101  non-­‐compliant    C1+C2  Soviet  Resource  in  addiJon  to    historic    equivalent  of  10%  of  the  P1  Soviet  defined  resource.     “Develop  ExisJng  Resources  and  Expand  Our  Asset   Porvolio  &  Footprint  in  the  Strategic  Metals  Sector,   Regionally  and  Worldwide”   9  
  • 10.
    10 •  The  Werner  Lake  Project  consists  of  the  historic  Werner  Lake  and  Werner  Lake   West  cobalt-­‐copper-­‐gold  mines   •  The  project  lies  within  the  Werner  Lake  Belt,  that  also  hosts  the  historic  Gordon   Lake  copper-­‐nickel  mine   •   The  present  day  Werner  Lake  Project  hosts  the  two  former  cobalt  producers   and  several  other  auracJve  exploraJon  targets   •  The  Werner  Lake  Mine  produced  146,386  lbs  of  cobalt  from  1940  to  1944     •  The  Werner  Lake  West  Mine  produced  approximately  10,000  tonnes  of  cobalt   ore  between  1996  and  1997  under  the  direcJon  of  Canmine  Resources   CorporaJon   •  Significant  opportunity  to  increase  exisJng  resource  with  planned  exploraJon   and  extension  program   *The  historical  resource  esJmates  at  Werner  Lake  are  not  being  treated  as  a  mineral  reserve  or  mineral  resource.    Key  assumpJons,  parameters,  and  methods  used  to  prepare  the  historical  esJmates  are  not  known.     A  qualified  person  has  not  done  sufficient  work  to  classify  the  historical  esJmate  as  a  mineral  resource  or  mineral  reserve.    AddiJonal  drilling  and  tesJng  is  required  to  determine  a  current  classificaJon  as  a  mineral   resource  or  mineral  reserve.    The  Company  is  not  treaJng  the  historical  informaJon  as  a  current  mineral  resource  or  mineral  reserve  and  the  reader  is  cauJoned  to  not  rely  upon  this  data.    Please  refer  to  the   “Werner  Lake  Mineral  Belt  ProperJes  Technical  Report”  by  Gerald  Harper,  Ph.D.,  P.Geo.  (On),  dated  March  22,  2011  and  revised  June  23,  2011  as  filed  on  SEDAR.   WERNER LAKE – PRIMARY COBALT IN CANADA Drill  Rig  at  Werner   Core  from  Werner   Tonnes   Cobalt  (%)   Copper  (%)   Gold  (opt)   Proven  Reserves*   140,031   0.47   0.26   0.008   Probable  Reserves*   40,829   0.25   0.43   0.030   Total*   180,860   0.42   0.30   0.013   Indicated  Resources*   51,456   0.13   0.20   0.003   Inferred  Resources*   869,378   0.29   0.28   0.011  
  • 11.
    11 WERNER LAKE PROJECT LOCATION       Lake Winnipeg Lake of the Woods Winnipeg Lac du Bonnet Kenora ONTARIO MANITOBA MINNESOTA WERNER LAKE PROJECT Caribou Falls Grassy Narrows 10 10 20 30 40 50020 KILOMETRES Minaki Canadian Pacific Railway Canadian Pacific RailwayCanadian National Railway 12 71 315 1 Werner Lake Project Kenora Mining District, NW Ontario
  • 12.
    12 WERNER LAKE MINERALBELT PHASE I & II DRILL RESULTS Completed:   •  1.21%  cobalt  over  12.30  metres   •  High-­‐grade  intercept  of  over  12%  cobalt  over  0.90  metres   •  High-­‐grade  intercepts  associated  with  anomalous  Cu,  Ni  and  Au   values   •  Over  12%  Co  returned  in  hole  WL10-­‐004  showing  a  zone  of  more   than  5%  sulphides  in  peridoJte  with  porJons  that  carry  from  5  to   45%  sulphides   •  Discovery  of  high  grade  eastern  extension  of  800  metres  from   Werner  Lake  cobalt  deposit   •  7,565m  of  drilling  in  31  holes  over  the  winter  and  spring  of   2009-­‐2010   Next  Steps:   •  Evaluate  Werner  Lake  with  a  goal  to  resume  the  work  necessary  to   finalize  the  already  iniJated  NI  43-­‐101  compliant  resource  report  
  • 13.
    13 LOCATION OF MINERAL DEPOSITSIN THE WERNER LAKE BELT       Granitoid Rocks (undivided) Mafic Gneiss & ultramafic-mafic intrusions Metasedimentary migmatite assemblage Werner-Rex Lake Fault Magmatic Ni-Cu-Cr-PGE deposits Co-Cu and Co skarnoid deposits Remobilised sulphide deposits Werner Lake Mine Gordon Lake Mine Norpax Deposit East Werner Lake km 40 Location of Mineral Deposits in the Werner Lake Belt Proposed Airborne Geophysics Survey Eastern Shallows AREA OF PROPOSED AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICS
  • 14.
    14 SIMPLIFIED GEOLOGY, MINESITES AND SHOWINGS       Metasedimentary Rocks Granitoid Intrusions Tonalite-Trondhjemite- Granodiorite Intrusions Ultramafic Rocks Migmatites Amphibolite & Alteration Roads Co-Cu-Au Mineralisation Fault km 2500 Limit of Mapping Limit of Mapping Werner Lake Project Simplified Geology, Mine Sites and Showings Werner Lake West Old Mine Site East Zone
  • 15.
    15 *The  historical  resource  esJmates  at  Werner  Lake  are  not  being  treated  as  a  mineral  reserve  or  mineral  resource.    Key  assumpJons,  parameters,  and  methods  used  to   prepare  the  historical  esJmates  are  not  known.    A  qualified  person  has  not  done  sufficient  work  to  classify  the  historical  esJmate  as  a  mineral  resource  or  mineral  reserve.     AddiJonal   drilling   and   tesJng   is   required   to   determine   a   current   classificaJon   as   a   mineral   resource   or   mineral   reserve.     The   Company   is   not   treaJng   the   historical   informaJon  as  a  current  mineral  resource  or  mineral  reserve  and  the  reader  is  cauJoned  to  not  rely  upon  this  data.    Please  refer  to  the  “Werner  Lake  Mineral  Belt   ProperJes  Technical  Report”  by  Gerald  Harper,  Ph.D.,  P.Geo.  (On),  dated  March  22,  2011  and  revised  June  23,  2011  as  filed  on  SEDAR.   WERNER LAKE MINERAL BELT IDEALIZED LONGITUDINAL SECTION       350 m 150 m 50 m Werner Lake Idealised Longitudinal Section (Looking North) 200m 250 m West East Surface Werner West Zone Old Mine Site Historic Resource Area Recent Drill Hole 10-019 0.028, 0.507 3.3 0.120, 0.560 1.4 0.05, 0.46 0.80 1.21, 0.22 12.3 09-001 10-005 09-002 10-004 10-003 10-006 10-008 10-012 10-007 10-01910-023 10-020 10-011 10-009 10-010 10-028 10-018 10-021 10-025 10-027 10-030 10-026 10-032 10-024 10-022 10-013 10-017 10-015 10-016 10-029 10-033 10-031B 10-014 0.14, 0.38 3.1 0.124, 4.346 1.2 0.04, 0.20 1.9 0.012, 0.323 0.4 0.102, 0.266 2,4 0.10, 0.37 4.3 0.011, 0.382 0.9 0.053, 0.159 1.2 0.122, 0.241 0.9 0.377, 0.135 1.6 NSR NSR NSR 0.011, 0.431 1.3 0.020, 0.234 0.9 NSR 0.025, 2.43 4.9 0.289, 0.096 4.7 0.288, 0.156 1.1 NSR NSR NSR 0.279, 0.085 2.7 0.039, 0.422 1.4 0.007, 0.142 1.0 0.017, 0.274 3.0 0.196, 0.145 2.8 NSR % Co, % Cu m
  • 16.
    16 PHASE 1: WERNERLAKE GOALS, PROJECTIONS & FUNDING REQUIREMENTS TASK   STATUS   FUNDING   REQUIREMENT   Project  Management  /  Data  CompilaJon   2015  Q1-­‐Q4   $90,000   Land  AcquisiJon  –  Staking   2015  Q1   $60,000   Geophysics   2015  Q1-­‐Q2   $175,000   Geology  /  Geochemistry   2015  Q1-­‐Q4   $330,000   LogisJcs  &  Admin  Support   2015  Q1-­‐Q4   131,500   Diamond  Drilling   2015  Q2-­‐Q3   $0   ConJngency  (10%)   2015  Q1-­‐Q4   $78,650   TOTAL   $865,150  
  • 17.
    17 PHASE 2: WERNERLAKE GOALS, PROJECTIONS & FUNDING REQUIREMENTS TASK   STATUS   FUNDING   REQUIREMENT   Project  Management  /  Data  CompilaJon   2016  Q1-­‐Q4   $90,000   Land  AcquisiJon  –  Staking   -­‐   $0   Geophysics   2016  Q1-­‐Q2   $55,000   Geology  /  Geochemistry   2016  Q3-­‐Q4   $236,000   LogisJcs  &  Admin  Support   2016  Q2-­‐Q3   $87,000   Diamond  Drilling   2016  Q2-­‐Q3   $1,400,000   ConJngency  (10%)   2016  Q1-­‐Q4   $186,800   TOTAL   $2,054,800  
  • 18.
    18 A FOOTHOLD INTHE FAMED IDAHO COBALT BELT       •  The  Iron  Creek  project  provides  Global  Cobalt   with  a  foothold  in  the  Idaho  Cobalt  Belt,  the   most  prolific  belt  of  cobalt  mineralisaJon  in  the   United  States.   •  Consists  of  seven  patented  mining  claims  of   approximately  118  acres  located  in  Lemhi   County  about  26  miles  southwest  of  the  town   of  Salmon,  Idaho.     •  Discovered  in  the  1940’s  as  a  possible  iron   deposit,  past  work  by  previous  operators   idenJfied  several  zones  of  cobalt-­‐copper   mineralisaJon.       •  Extensive  drilling,  sampling,  and  geologic  work   was  completed  on  two  of  the  most  promising   areas.     •  Numerous  other  exploraJon  targets  have  been   idenJfied  on  the  property  that  have  yet  to  be   fully  evaluated.   “The  addi)on  of  Iron  Creek  into  our  cobalt  project  por8olio  is  exci)ng  and  diversifies  our  project  mix  at   a  )me  when  cobalt  is  becoming  increasingly  important  in  the  baAery  sector.”   Entrance  to  ExisJng  Adit  at  Iron  Creek  
  • 19.
    19 IRON CREEK PROJECT LOCATION       Salmon River Montana Idaho Lemhi County Custer County Hwy 75 Hwy 93 Hwy 28 Hwy 93 Challis Macay Bear Track Blackbird Yellowjacket Salmon Cobalt Miles 200 Iron Creek Project Idaho Cobalt Project Idaho USA
  • 20.
    20 IRON CREEK PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS       •  The  Iron  Creek  project  provides  Global  Cobalt  with  a  foothold  in  the  Idaho   Cobalt  Belt,  the  most  prolific  belt  of  cobalt  mineralisaJon  in  the  United   States.   •  Approximately  30,000  feet  of  diamond  drilling  and  1,500  feet  of  underground   driying  has  been  completed  exploring  the  project  by  previous  operators.   •  Historic  literature  defines  "two  disJnct  lenses  of  cobalt  mineralizaJon."     •  The  first  lens  esJmated  to  contain  1,050,000  tons  grading  0.61%  cobalt  and   0.3%  copper  and  having  a  strike  length  of  about  750  feet.     •  A  second  lens  of  high-­‐grade  cobalt  mineralizaJon  of    229,000  tons  extends   for  600  feet  of  strike  length,  is  deeper  than  the  first  lens,  and  averages  about   0.48%  Co  and  0.24%  Cu.   •  Historic  met  work  indicates  that  the  project  has  low  arsenic  levels  that   disJnguishes  the  project  from  others  in  the  belt     •   A  posiJve  as  it  make  potenJal  process  handling  easier  and  less  costly     *The   historical   resource   esJmates   at   the   Iron   Creek   Project   are   not   being   treated   as   a   mineral   reserve   or   mineral   resource.     Key   assumpJons,   parameters,   and   methods  used  to  prepare  the  historical  esJmates  are  not  known.    A  qualified  person  has  not  done  sufficient  work  to  classify  the  historical  esJmate  as  a  mineral   resource  or  mineral  reserve.    AddiJonal  drilling  and  tesJng  is  required  to  determine  a  current  classificaJon  as  a  mineral  resource  or  mineral  reserve.    The  Company  is   not  treaJng  the  historical  informaJon  as  a  current  mineral  resource  or  mineral  reserve  and  the  reader  is  cauJoned  to  not  rely  upon  this  data  
  • 21.
    21 IRON CREEK PROPERTY GEOLOGICALCOMPILATION       Quartzite Argillite Quartzite Argillite 10 W20 W30 W40 W50 W 0 500 feet Underground Workings Drill Hole Geological Contact Limits of Sulphide Zone Tertiary Challis Volcanics Proterozoic Yellowjacket Fm Mineralisation Modified from Ristorcelli 1988 Iron Creek Property Geological Compilation with Drill Holes No Name Zone
  • 22.
    22 IRON CREEK PROJECT SIGNIFICANTDRILL INTERCEPTS       7,000 EL 6,600 EL 6,200 EL Iron Creek Property Lemhi County, Idaho No Name Zone: Section 12 Looking West Significant Drill Intercepts W-1 0.32% Co, 0.37% Cu 54.0 ft 0.40% Co, 0.30% Cu 85.0 ft 0.25% Co, 0.07% Cu 45.0 ft 0.25% Co, 0.86% Cu 80.0 ft B-1 IC-16 Phyllite Quartzite 143’ 180’ 608’
  • 23.
    23 IRON CREEK GOALS, PROJECTIONS& FUNDING REQUIREMENTS TASK   STATUS   FUNDING   REQUIREMENT   (Es=mated)   CompilaJon  of  historic  data  into  Technical  Report   Q4  2014/Q1  2015   $100,000     Geological  Analysis  with  Supervision     •  Enhance  the  understanding  of  the  geology  and  possible   mineralizaJon     Q1  2015   $100,000     Geophysical  Survey   •  Airborne   •  Ground   Q1  2015   $250,000   Diamond  Drilling   •  IniJal  recommendaJon  of  +/-­‐  7,000m  to  replicate   historical  drilling  work  effort   Q2  2015   $1,750,000  
  • 24.
    THE ALTAI: APRO-MINING REGION Kazakhstan   Mongolia   China   KARAKUL,  Altai  Republic   24   Altai  Republic,   Russia  
  • 25.
    THE KARAKUL COBALT PROJECT EsJmated  values  given  43-­‐101  non-­‐compliant    C1+C2  Soviet  Resource  in  addiJon  to    historic    equivalent  of  10%  of  the  P1  Soviet  defined  resource.     •  The  Karakul  deposit  is  a   hydrothermal  polymetallic   sulphide  deposit  with  elevated   content  of  cobalt,  copper,   tungsten,  bismuth  and  silver   •  At  least  five  parallel  north-­‐ south  trending  structurally   controlled  sulphide  zones  are   delineated  by  historical   exploraJon  works,  including   the  Western,  Eastern,   Southwestern,  Northeastern   and  Malachite  Zones   25 The  Karakul  Camp  
  • 26.
    KARAKUL COBALT PROJECT EARN-INBY GLOBAL COBALT EsJmated  values  given  43-­‐101  non-­‐compliant    C1+C2  Soviet  Resource  in  addiJon  to    historic    equivalent  of  10%  of  the  P1  Soviet  defined  resource.     •  Global  Cobalt  has  an  opJon  from  Imperial   Mining  Holding  Limited  (“IMHL”)  to  earn   100%  of  five  mineral  resource  projects   including  the  following:     •  Karakul  Cobalt  Project     •  Altai  Sister  properJes:   o  Kuruozek;  Yantau;  Toshtuozek  and   Olendzhular   •  Enables  greater  control  over  a  robust  project   porvolio   •  Ability  to  leverage  itself  for  future   opportuniJes   •  ConsideraJon  for  the  OpJon  in  the   ProperJes  includes:   •  ObligaJon  to  incur  minimum  cumulaJve   expenditures  (up  to  $15M)  by  December   31,  2015  to  earn  up  to  a  74.9%  interest   in  the  properJes   26 Drill  Rig  at  Karakul  
  • 27.
  • 28.
    KARAKUL ESTIMATES 28   The  current  size,  scale  and  potenJal  of  Karakul  makes  it  one  of  the  largest   known  primary  sources  of  the  strategic  metal  cobalt  globally.     Global Cobalt Corporation NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Karakul Property and Adjacent Satellite Occurrences, Republic of Altai, Russian Federation Table 1.1: Summary of Karakul Mineral Resource Statement – By Mineralised Zone, Cut-off Grade of 0.05% Cobalt Equivalent WAI (June 30, 2014) Western Zone Resource Classification Rock Type Tonnes (Kt) Density Co (%) Bi (%) Cu (%) WO3 (%) Ag (g/t) CoEq (%) Contained Metal CoEq (t) Co (t) Bi (t) Cu (t) WO3 (t) Ag (t) Indicated Oxide 981.01 2.56 0.024 0.068 0.269 0.096 0.87 0.257 230.88 664.67 2,640.99 940.51 0.85 2,525.87 Indicated Sulphide 17,156.33 2.96 0.113 0.057 0.362 0.056 3.13 0.318 19,449.50 9,753.72 62,146.50 9,629.98 53.71 54,480.66 Total Indicated Oxide+Sulphide 18,137.34 0.109 0.057 0.357 0.058 3.01 0.314 19,680.38 10,418.39 64,787.49 10,570.49 54.56 57,006.53 Inferred Oxide 17.82 2.56 0.007 0.001 0.067 0.037 0.00 0.069 1.19 0.22 12.00 6.57 0.00 12.34 Inferred Sulphide 2,915.63 3.11 0.096 0.107 0.325 0.053 4.48 0.326 2,792.06 3,131.74 9,467.09 1,532.24 13.07 9,509.79 Total Inferred Oxide+Sulphide 2,933.45 0.095 0.107 0.323 0.052 4.46 0.325 2,793.25 3,131.96 9,479.09 1,538.81 13.07 9,522.13 Eastern Zone Inferred Oxide 147.26 2.56 0.034 0.061 0.211 0.102 3.08 0.261 49.54 89.36 311.16 150.84 0.45 384.91 Inferred Sulphide 5,971.10 2.89 0.078 0.066 0.218 0.045 1.80 0.237 4,636.72 3,939.70 13,001.47 2,690.20 10.73 14,167.84 Total Inferred Oxide+Sulphide 6,118.36 0.077 0.066 0.218 0.046 1.83 0.238 4,686.26 4,029.07 13,312.63 2,841.04 11.18 14,552.75 Notes: 1. Mineral Resources are not reserves until they have demonstrated economic viability based on a feasibility study or pre-feasibility study; 2. Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of any reserves; 3. Grade represents estimated contained metal in the ground and has not been adjusted for metallurgical recovery; 4. No additional mining factors applied and; 5. Numbers may not add due to rounding. 6. Co Equivalent calculated based on the following parameters assuming 100% recovery: Metals US$/lb (USD$/0z) US$/tonne CoEq factor Co 13.608 30,000 1 Cu 3.266 7,200 0.2400 Bi 9.888 21,800 0.7267 WO3 16.783 37,000 1.2333 Ag 20 0.6430 0.0021 Conversion Factor lb/kg g/troy oz 2204.623 31.10348 Factor 22.0462
  • 29.
    DISTRICT STRATEGY 29   • Proximity  of  Altai  Sister  ProperJes  to   Karakul  adds  the  possibility  of  addiJonal   resources  within  20km  of  Karakul   •  Provides  significant  upside  to  the   creaJon  of  a  new  mining  jurisdicJon  in   the  Altai  region   •  Kuruozek:     •  Extension  of  the  Karakul   mineralizing  system  less  than  5km   from  the  adit  area   •  Olendzhular  &  Toshtuozek:   •  Excellent  tungsten  values  and   copper  mineralizaJon  exposed  in   surface  trenching   •  Yantau:     •  Preliminary  sampling  idenJfied  two   areas  of  anomalous  silver  over   Eastern  Zone   29  
  • 30.
    JUNIOR RESOURCE COMPANY WITHMAJOR PARTNERS EsJmated  values  given  43-­‐101  non-­‐compliant    C1+C2  Soviet  Resource  in  addiJon  to    historic    equivalent  of  10%  of  the  P1  Soviet  defined  resource.     30   “Con$nue  to  build  a  significant  enterprise  in  coopera$on  with   influen$al  and  strong  partners”   Beijing  General  Research  Ins$tute  of  Mining  &  Metallurgy  (BGRIMM):  will  act  as   engineering,  procurement  and  construcJon  contractor  and  develop  a  project   assessment  for  markeJng  solely  in  the  China   Beijing  Easpring  Material  &  Technology  Co.  (Easpring):  preliminary  off-­‐take   agreement  in  place  with  Easpring,  a  leading  specialized  supplier  of  cathode   material  for  lithium-­‐ion  baueries  to  industry  giants  such  as  Samsung,  Sony,   Panasonic,  and  BYD   CITIC  Merchant  Bank:  provide  relaJonships  into  CITIC  Capital  and  other  Chinese   SOEs   European  Bank  for  Reconstruc$on  and  Development  (EBRD):  is  a  current   shareholder  of  Global  Cobalt  and  will  conJnue  to  provide  vital  financial  and   poliJcal  input   The  Russian  Federa$on:  approved  the  foreign  bid  for  a  strategic  asset,  granted  an   open  pit  permit,  and  commiued  along  with  the  Altai  Republic  CDN  $440M  for   local  infrastructure  with  Karakul  as  the  pilot  project  
  • 31.
    31 Ms.  Erin  Chu`er,  President  &  CEO,  Director   •  President  and  CEO  of  Global  Cobalt;  founded  as  Puget  Ventures  in  2007.   •  Prior  to  founding  Puget,  Ms.  Chuuer  worked  for  PlaJnum  Group  Metals,  Mag  Silver,  West  Timmins  Mining.   •  ExperJse  in  management,  finance,  M&A,  strategy  and  operaJons.   •  From   1992-­‐2001,   Ms.   Chuuer   held   various   posiJons   for   federal   and   provincial   government   officials,   including   the   Leader   of   the   federal     OpposiJon,  Minister  of  Indian  Affairs  and  Minister  of  Defence.   •  Ms.  Chuuer  sits  on  the  Boards  of  the  Canadian  Taxpayer's  FederaJon  and  the  MacDonald  Laurier  InsJtute,  and  is  the  Chair  of  the  Canada   Eurasian  Russia  Business  AssociaJon,  Vancouver  Chapter.       •  Ms.  Chuuer  was  recognized  with  a  2011  Business  in  Vancouver  “Top  40  Under  40”  achievement  award.   Mr.  Oleg  Scherbina,  Chief  Financial  Officer   •  Mr.  Scherbina  is  a  financial  manager  with  experience  in  all  aspects  of  accounJng  and  financial  management.   •  He  has  direct  experience  within  the  mining,  construcJon  and  oil/gas  sectors  and  has  been  involved  with  numerous  mining  companies,   including  Uranium  One,  Eureka  Mining  Plc  and  Bema  Gold  CorporaJon.   •  Currently,  Mr.  Scherbina  is  responsible  for  the  development  of  the  accounJng  system  for  the  parent  company  and  subsidiary  companies  of   Global  Cobalt,  as  well  as  for  day-­‐to-­‐day  financial  operaJons  of  the  company,  including  contract  review,  payroll,  budgeJng  and  financial   control  development.   •  Mr.  Scherbina  is  fluent  in  English,  Russian  and  Ukrainian  and  as  such  played  an  important  role  in  the  coordinaJon  and  execuJon  of  all   finance-­‐related   acJviJes   of   the   Bema   Gold   and   Eureka   Mining   operaJons   in   Russia,   while   also   managing   administraJve   and   human   resources  funcJons.   Mr.  Paul  Sarjeant,  P.Geo,  VP  Explora=on   •  Mr.  Sarjeant,  P.  Geo,  has  extensive  exploraJon,  project  evaluaJon  and  acquisiJon  experience  both  in  Canada  and  internaJonally  and  has   developed  a  solid  background  in  company  management  through  various  execuJve  management  posiJons  with  several  publicly  traded  junior   resource  companies.     •  Mr.  Sarjeant  began  his  career  with  Echo  Bay  Mines  Ltd.  as  a  project  geologist  working  on  projects  in  the  NWT,  Archean  greenstone  belts,   Lupin  Mine  peripheral  project,  and  skarn  properJes  in  BC  and  Ecuador.     •  He  was  appointed  Senior  Geologist,  InternaJonal  ExploraJon  Group,  responsible  for  project  evaluaJon  outside  of  North  America,  including   precious  and  base  metals  projects  in  South  America,  East  Africa,  South  East  Asia,  Russia,  Mongolia,  Australia,  New  Zealand  and  Europe.       FOCUSED & MOTIVATED
  • 32.
    32 Mr.  Mitchell  Smith,  Corporate  Development   •  Mr.  Smith  has  over  10  years  of  experience  in  senior  management  roles  encompassing  markeJng,  sales,  shareholder  relaJons,  corporate   communicaJons,  public  relaJons  and  business  development.     •  Mr.  Smith  began  his  career  in  the  mining  sector  in  2007,  tenured  with  the  Petaquilla  Group  of  Companies  (Petaquilla  Minerals  TSX:PTQ  and   Petaquilla   Copper   (TSX:PTC))   (nowFirst   Quantum’s   Cobre   Panama   project)   where   he   worked   in   shareholders   relaJons   and   managed   communicaJons  between  the  Vancouver  and  Panama  headquarters.   •  Mr.  Smith  is  responsible  for  developing,  implemenJng  and  execuJng  all  aspects  of  Global  Cobalt’s  corporate  development  acJviJes  in  its   transformaJon  from  Puget  Ventures  Inc.   •  Mr.  Smith  sits  on  the  Editorial  Board  of  the  AssociaJon  of  Mineral  ExploraJon  BriJsh  Columbia  (AMEBC),  an  industry  advocate  organizaJon   for  successful  and  responsible  mineral  exploraJon  &  development  and  the  predominant  voice  of  mineral  exploraJon  and  development  in   BriJsh  Columbia.         Mr.  Graham  Abbo`,  Shareholder  Rela=ons   •  Mr.  Abbou  has  12  years  of  corporate  experience  with  Telus,  with  involvement  in  business  sales,  operaJons  and  team  management  and   responsibility  for  mulJ-­‐million  dollar  transacJons.   •  In-­‐depth  experience  with  long-­‐cycle  corporate  deal  development  and  complex  relaJonship  management.   •  Involvement  with  several  public  companies  in  business  and  corporate  development  (both  strategic  and  financial),  operaJons  management   and  shareholders  relaJons  acJviJes.   •  Key  member  of  team  responsible  for  consolidaJng  and  finalizing  the  Salares  Lithium  property  package  into  the  publicly  listed  company  that   became  Talison  Lithium.  Talison  Lithium  was  acquired  for  over  $750M  in  the  first  quarter  2013.       Mr.  Jaime  Stallwood,  Shareholder  Rela=ons   •  30  years  entrepreneurial  experience  managing  companies  from  early  stage  development  to  mulJ-­‐million  dollar  NASDAQ  listed  companies   on  both  the  operaJons  and  corporate  levels.   •  Managed  a  naJonal  sales  force  in  excess  of  200  salespeople  for  a  naJonal  Telecom  Provider  while  at  the  same  Jme  implemenJng  naJonal   consumer  markeJng  and  iniJaJves.   •  Key  involvement  with  LML  Payment  Systems  (a  NASDAQ  listed  company)  that  was  sold  for  $110M  in  first  quarter  of  2013.   •  Has  parJcipated  in  numerous  M&A  transacJons  as  well  as  subsequent  integraJon,  uJlizaJon  and  markeJng  acJviJes.       FOCUSED & MOTIVATED
  • 33.
    33 BOARD  OF  DIRECTORS:       Mr.  Gaston  Reymenants,  Director  Global  Cobalt   •  DisJnguished  career  in  mining,  smelJng,  refining  and  metal  trading  spans  over  forty  years,  during  which,  he  was  also  responsible  for  the  financing  of   several  off-­‐take  projects  in  Australia,  China  and  the  Americas.       •  Served  over  20  years  with  Falconbridge  InternaJonal  in  various  managerial  posiJons  and  was  part  of  the  joint  venture  with  Norilsk  Kombinat.       •  Was  managing  director  of  Kola  InternaJonal  Murmansk,  and  held  director  and/or  senior  managerial  posiJons  with  several  companies  with  cobalt  assets   including  Baja  Mining,  Polymet  Mining  and  KCM.   •  Mr.  Reymenants’s  wealth  of  knowledge  in  the  cobalt  and  industrial  metals  sectors  will  prove  an  excellent  resource  to  Global  Cobalt.       Mr.  Jean-­‐Pierre  Colin,  Director  Global  Cobalt   •  Mr.   Colin   is   a   mining   execuJve   who   provides   corporate   strategy   consulJng   services   to   boards   and   shareholders   of   high   profile   internaJonal   mining   companies  and  was  was  an  investment  banker,  leading  corporate  finance  and  M&A  departments  of  several  securiJes  brokerage  houses  in  Canada.   •  He  is  a  Director  of  Premier  Gold  Mines  (TSX:PG),  Director  of  Xmet  Inc.  (TSX.V:XME)  and  is  special  advisor  to  the  ExecuJve  Chairman  and  Board  of  BlackRock   Metals  Inc.   •  He  is  the  former  Faculty  of  Arts  Co-­‐Chair  of  the  Waterloo  Advisory  Council,  founder  of  Caratax  Management  Ltd.,  a  manager  of  public  flow-­‐through  share   limited  partnerships,  and  a  former  director  of  Wolfden  Resources  Inc.,  Pelangio  Mines  Inc.,  Virginia  Gold  Mines  Inc.,  and  NIM  Management,  the  manager   of  over  $730  million  of  flow-­‐through  funds.     •  Mr.  Colin  is  a  Member  of  the  Bar  of  the  Province  of  Quebec  and  holds  a  Master  of  Business  AdministraJon  from  the  University  of  Western  Ontario,  a  Civil   Law  Degree  from  the  University  of  Ouawa  and  a  CerJficate  in  ComparaJve  Law  from  the  University  of  Manitoba.       Mr.  Alexander  Ordanian,  Director  Global  Cobalt   •  Mr.   Ordanian's   experience   in   the   mineral,   construcJon   development   and   investment   industry,   specializing   in   corporate   finance,   capital   markets   and   private  business,  spans  well  over  twenty  years.     •  He  has  a  vast  experience  with  emerging  markets  parJcularly  in  the  Russian  FederaJon  and  CIS  countries  as  well  as  in  Central  and  Eastern  Europe.   •  He  has  operated  and  been  associated  with  various  board  and  senior  management  teams,  and  successfully  managed  the  chief  execuJve  funcJon  for  a   holding  group  of  companies  with  mulJple  business  streams.   •  During  his  highly  respected  career  he  worked  on  key  merger  and  acquisiJon  transacJons  with  a  number  of  major  internaJonal  companies  including  Mobil,   BriJsh  Petroleum  and  Shell.     •  Currently,  Mr.  Ordanian  is  a  member  of  the  Board  of  Directors  of  Imperial  Mining  Holding  Limited  and  one  of  the  directors  of  a  North  American  merchant   services  company.     DEDICATED & EXPERIENCED
  • 34.
    34 BOARD  OF  DIRECTORS  CONTINUED:           Mr.  Peter  Reynolds,  Director  Global  Cobalt   •  Mr.  Reynolds  is  engaged  by  EBRD  to  carry  out  reviews  of  EBRD's  investments  for  several  projects  in  Mongolia  and  Russia  and  was  previously  the  EBRD's  nominated   Director  on  the  Board  of  IMHL.   •  Nearly  40  years  in  the  minerals  industry,  with  high-­‐level  experience  at  various  mines  including  being  former  Manager  of  OperaJons  Planning  &  Mine  Projects/Manager   Mine  Business  Improvement  at  Olympic  Dam  and  was  former  Managing  Director  Marlborough  Resources  as  well  as  Mining  Engineer  Normandy  Mining.     Mr.  Ray  Castelli,  Director  Global  Cobalt   •  Mr.  Castelli  was  appointed  CEO  of  Weatherhaven,  one  of  the  world's  leading  manufacturers  of  redeploy  able  camps  and  shelter  systems,  in  January  2008.   •  Weatherhaven  has  grown  to  become  a  key  supplier  to  the  Canadian,  US,  Australian  and  NATO  armed  forces,  numerous  resource  exploraJon  companies  as  well  as  the   United  NaJons  and  other  disaster  and  humanitarian  relief  agencies.   •  Mr.  Castelli  was  co-­‐founder  and  Senior  Vice  President  of  Quadrem,  a  Dallas-­‐based  global  supply  chain  and  e-­‐procurement  company,  serving  19  of  the  world's  largest   natural  resource  companies,  including  Rio  Tinto,  BHP  Billiton,  Alcan  and  Inco.  His  role  was  to  build  the  global  organizaJon  and  product  set  for  this  e-­‐business  pioneer.   •  Mr.  Castelli  joined  Alcan  in  1995  following  business  school  in  Europe.  He  was  promoted  to  Alcan's  Montreal  headquarters  in  1997  as  Director  of  Strategic  Planning.       Mr.  Kamen  Zahariev,  Director  Global  Cobalt   •  Mr.  Zahariev  is  a  highly  respected  and  experienced  internaJonal  debt  and  equity  finance  and  investment  professional  with  parJcular  emphasis  on  Emerging  Markets  and   Central  and  Eastern  Europe.     •  Currently,  Mr.  Zahariev  is  a  member  of  the  investment  commiuee  at  CEE  Special  SituaJon  Fund  and  is  a  Director  overseeing  the  team  responsible  for  European  Bank  for   ReconstrucJon  and  Development's  (the  EBRD)  significant  porvolio  of  restructuring  projects  throughout  Central  and  Eastern  Europe.       •  He  has  extensive  experience  as  non-­‐execuJve  member  of  the  board  of  investee  companies  and  senior  advisor  of  investment  funds  in  the  region.   •  In  the  last  15  years  Kamen  Zahariev  has  parJcipated  in  over  50  significant  transacJons  including  project  finance,  M&A,  private  equity  and  workouts.   •  He  is  member  on  the  supervisory  board  at  Prista  Oil  B.V.    Group,  is  a  member  of  the  BriJsh  InsJtute  of  Directors  and  is  also  associated  with  several  business  organizaJons   with  interests  in  Eastern  Europe.   Mr.  Marc  Thomas,  Director  Global  Cobalt   •  Mr.  Thomas,  P.Eng  is  an  EU  NaJonal  who  is  fluent  in  Russian  and  has  worked  and  traveled  extensively  throughout  Russia  &  the  former  CIS  countries  for  the  past  15  years.   •  He  is  currently  the  General  Director  and  Partner  in  IST,  a  technology  company  represenJng  European  and  American  industrial  equipment  in  the  Russian  marketplace  and   serves  as  Director  at  Imperial  Mining  Holding  Limited.   •  He  has  served  in  a  series  of  leadership  roles  of  increasing  responsibility  and  is  a  high  performing  leader,  with  strategic  and  commercial  acumen  obtained  from  start-­‐ups   and  business  development  in  blue  chip  and  fast  growth  Russian  companies.   •  Mr.  Thomas  has  also  been  involved  with  three  corporate  re-­‐structurings  in  the  natural  resource  sector.  He  holds  an  MBA  from  INSEAD  (France)  and  a  BSc.,  Engineering   from  the  Colorado  School  of  Mines.     DEDICATED & EXPERIENCED
  • 35.
    SUMMARY EsJmated  values  given  43-­‐101  non-­‐compliant    C1+C2  Soviet  Resource  in  addiJon  to    historic    equivalent  of  10%  of  the  P1  Soviet  defined  resource.     35   VISION:    Achieve  growth  as  a  leading  strategic  metals  group  and   enhance  overall  value  for  shareholders   STRATEGY:  Balanced  and  flexible  combinaJon  of  enhancing  exisJng   assets,  organic  growth  and  strategic  acquisiJons   PARTNERSHIPS:  ConJnue  to  build  a  significant  enterprise  in   cooperaJon  with  influenJal  and  strong  partners   ASSETS:  Develop  exisJng  resources  and  expand  asset  porvolio  &   footprint  in  the  natural  resources  sector,  regionally  and  worldwide   LEADERSHIP:  Engaged  to  the  central  vision  of  advancing  the  porvolio   of  quality  assets  to  ensure  corporate  growth  &  valuaJon  
  • 36.
    36   Global CobaltCorporation TSX.V:GCO OTCBB:GLBCF FRA: 3P0 Suite 1501-128 West Pender Street Vancouver, BC,V6B 1R8, Canada T. (604) 688-4219 F. (604) 688-4215 info@globalcobaltcorp.com www.GlobalCobaltCorp.com Twitter @GlobalCobalt “Powered  by  Cobalt”   36  
  • 37.