The document provides an overview of NanoNickel Inc., a company focused on exploring for nickel-copper sulphide deposits in Greenland and Canada. Key points include: - NanoNickel has a flagship project in southwest Greenland with district-scale land holdings and drill intersections of nickel-copper mineralization. - Global nickel consumption is increasing and half is used in China, while production is shifting to higher-cost laterite sources as sulfide deposits deplete. - NanoNickel has an experienced management team with expertise in nickel exploration and operations. - The company aims to become a supplier of nickel from sulfide deposits to help meet growing demand.

1. Maniitsoq NiManiitsoq Ni-Maniitsoq Ni-Cu Sulphide Project,Maniitsoq NiManiitsoq NiManiitsoq Ni Cu Sulphide Project,Cu Sulphide Project,Cu Sulphide Project,
SW GreenlandSW Greenland
June 2015

2. 2
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements
This document contains certain "forward-looking statements" and "forward-looking information" under applicable securities laws concerning the
business, operations and financial performance and condition of the Company. Forward-looking statements and forward-looking information include, but
are not limited to, statements with respect to the ability to complete the port assignment, the ability of the Company to realize upon the benefit of owning
the port, impact of mineralogy, estimation of mineral resources at mineral projects of the Company; economics of production; success of exploration
activities; the future economics of minerals including nickel and copper; synergies and financial impact facilities; the benefits of the development
potential of the properties of the Company and currency exchange rate fluctuations. Except for statements of historical fact relating to the Company,
certain information contained herein constitutes forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are frequently characterized by words such as
"plan," "expect," "project," "intend," "believe," "anticipate", "estimate" and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or
"will" occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are based
on a number of assumptions and subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ
materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Many of these assumptions are based on factors and events that are not within the
control of the Company and there is no assurance they will prove to be correct. Factors that could cause actual results to vary materially from results
anticipated by such forward-looking statements include difficulties realized in completion of the assignment, barriers to the assignment, difficulties in
development of the assets and suitability of the port in relation to development of the assets of the Company, variations in metal grades, changes in
market conditions, variations in recovery rates, risks relating to international operations, fluctuating metal prices and currency exchange rates, and other
risks of the mining industry, including but not limited to the failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated. The Company cautions that
the foregoing list of important factors is not exhaustive. Investors and others who base themselves on forward-looking statements should carefully
consider the above factors as well as the uncertainties they represent and the risk they entail. The Company believes that the expectations reflected in
those forward-looking statements are reasonable, but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct and such forward-
looking statements included in this document should not be unduly relied upon. These statements speak only as of the date of this document. The
Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or management's estimates or opinions should change except
as required by applicable securities laws.
Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those
described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended.
Statements concerning mineral reserve and resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent they involve
estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the property is developed.
Statements about the Company's future expectations and all other statements in this document other than historical facts are "forward looking
statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and as that term
defined in the Private Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company intends that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbours created
thereby. Since these statements involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change at any time, the Company's actual results may differ materially
from the expected results.

3. 3
COMPANY OVERVIEW
Exploring for nickel-copper sulphides in Greenland and Canada
Prospector and Developer of the Year 2015 Award; Government of Greenland
 Company listed on the TSX-V in May 2011
 Corporate head office in Vancouver, Canada
 Flagship Maniitsoq exploration project in SW
Greenland with district scale land position with
significant greenfields Ni-Cu drill intersections
 Experienced management, board and advisors
with technical and operational nickel expertise
Well financed with strong cornerstone investor
CAPITAL STRUCTURE (As at June 2015)
Issued & Outstanding: 177,476,427
Warrants: ($0.21 - $1.00) 12,960,000
Options: 13,273,000
Fully Diluted: 203,709,427
52 Week High/Low $0.65/$0.18
Current Price $0.185
Market Cap $32 million
Cash $5.4 million
SIGNIFICANT SHAREHOLDERS
Sentient Group 46%
VMS Ventures 16.9%

4. 4
NAN: FOCUSED NiS STRATEGY
 Nickel consumption globally in 2014
was estimated as 1.92Mt, which is
forecast to increase in 2015 to
1.98Mt, and by a further 2.7% in
2016 to 2.04Mt
 This is the equivalent of consuming
10 10MT-2% nickel orebodies every
year
 Approximately half of the primary
nickel consumption will take place in
China. China is currently consuming
approx. 900,000t nickel per annum
 Approximately 18% of the total
world’s nickel production comes from
Indonesia
Source: CRU, Wood Mackenzie

5. NICKEL INDUSTRY C1 CASH COST CURVE 2015
5
 Depletion of low cost sulphide deposits; supply shifting to higher cost laterite sources
Flexed 2015 $ data 2014 $
Sources: Wood Mackenzie (Feb 2015), Mirabela Nickel Limited (February 15, 2015), First Quantum Minerals Ltd (March 31, 2015),
Lundin Mining Corporation (May 25, 2015), Sherritt International Corporation (May 12, 2015), Cliffs Natural Resources (April 2015)

6. NICKEL SULPHIDE vs NICKEL LATERITE
 73% of the world’s known nickel resources are found in laterite deposits
 Nickel sulphide deposits are being mined faster than they can be discovered
NICKEL SULPHIDE NICKEL LATERITE
Lower unit energy cost Unit energy costs 2 - 5 times higher
Well established, conventional extraction process Complex extraction process
Lower cash cost to produce Higher cash cost to produce
Lower environmental impact Increased environmental impact during production
and processing with higher carbon dioxide
emissions and land disruption
Few known, undeveloped high grade nickel
sulphide deposits
Many known and undeveloped nickel laterite
deposits
Source: Mudd, GM, 2009 Nickel Sulphide Versus Laterite: The Hard Sustainability Challenge Remains
6

7. 7
MANAGEMENT & TECHNICAL TEAM
Keith Morrison, P. Geo. – Chief Executive Officer
Over 35 years of international experience in the resources sector with an accomplished background in strategy, finance,
exploration, technology, global operations, capital markets and corporate development. Formerly, Mr. Morrison co-founded
two significant Canadian-based success stories, Quantec and QGX
Mark Fedikow, HBSc., M.Sc., Ph.D., P.Eng., P. Geo., C.P.G. - President
40 years of industry and government experience; Fellow of Assoc. of Applied Geochemists; former Chief Geologist,
Mineral Deposits Section, Manitoba Geological Survey
Cheryl Messier, CGA - Chief Financial Officer
Over 15 years in finance with last 7 years as CFO or controller in various public companies
Neil Richardson, P. Geo. - Chief Operating Officer
Over 26 years in mineral exploration (base metals, nickel and gold) and mining operations in Canada and globally;
extensive experience in resource-reserve estimations and operations primarily with Hudbay and Murgor
Patricia Tirschmann, P. Geo., HBSc., M.Sc. – Vice President, Exploration
26 years specializing in magmatic nickel-copper sulphide exploration in Canada and globally including 18 years with
Falconbridge Limited; most recently Vice President Exploration for Continental Nickel Limited
Jim Sparling, P. Geo., B.Sc., MBA - Project Manager
Over 25 years exploring for base metals, gold and nickel; member of Hudbay team that discovered four economic ore
bodies in the Flin Flon-Snow Lake belts; recently COO for Snip Gold and Exploration Manager for StrataGold

8. 8
DIRECTORS
John Sabine - Non-executive Chairman
Senior Counsel to Bennett Jones LLP with over 40 years of legal expertise in mining, corporate reorganizations, securities,
financings and mergers and acquisitions
Keith Morrison, – Chief Executive Officer
Douglas Ford - Director
27 years working in public markets, serving as CFO and board member for a number of junior companies; extensive experience in
corporate finance, financial reporting, compliance, public and media relations and operations
Mark Fedikow, - President
Gilbert Clark - Director
Geologist with more than 13 years of industry experience principally in mining and international resource developments; currently
an Investment Advisor with The Sentient Group, an independent private equity investment firm specializing in the global resources
industry
Jim Clucas - Director
Former Chief Financial Officer of Inco’s Canadian operations and involved in the development of several mineral deposits including
the Snow Lake Mine (High River Gold Mines), Montana Tunnels (Pegasus Mining) and the Fenix Project in Guatemala; founder of
International Nickel Ventures Inc.; currently President and CEO of Search Minerals
Edward Ford - Director
Chartered accountant and specialist in venture capital and bridge financing; over 40 years experience creating and implementing
financial development plans for client enterprises in Canada and the US
John Roozendaal - Director
20 years of mineral exploration experience; founding director, Interim CEO and President of VMS Ventures Inc.; directly involved in
the Reed Copper discovery

9. GREENLAND: OPEN FOR BUSINESS
POPULATION: 59,900
Capital: Nuuk
 Government: Greenland is a democratic country
with a transparent regulatory system,
competitive mining tax regime and no land
claims issues
 Pro Mining: Committed to resource extraction
 A number of mining projects in the exploitation
permitting process and one in construction
phase.
 Government 100% land ownership
 Tax and Royalty Rates: Effective Corporate Tax
Rate: 31.8% (same for Greenlandic and foreign
companies); royalty: 5.5% (mining)
9

10. 10
LOCATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
 Located on the southwest coast of Greenland, which is
pack ice free year-round
 Mild climate allows for year round mining & shipping of
concentrate
 Modern, well serviced container ports and European
standard logistical support and coastal re-supply services
Maniitsoq harbour looking east
towards the Maniitsoq project on the mainland

11. ACCESS GLOBAL MARKETS: SEQI PORT
 Situated on the south
boundary of the project
 Designed to accommodate
Panamax vessels up to
55,000 tonnes dry weight.
 Nearest nickel processing
facility is Vale’s Long
Harbour Processing Plant
(LHPP) in Newfoundland.
 Long Harbour is a state-of-
the-art hydrometallurgical
plant designed to process
concentrate into finished
nickel and associated
copper and cobalt products.
Approximately 2000
kilometres distance.
11

12. SEQI PORT ASSIGNMENT
12
 March 2015 NAN Executes Seqi
Assignment Agreement
 Benefits include
 ownership of key infrastructure
 reduced exploration logistical
costs
 reduced project capital
requirements and time-lines
 Costs include
 maintenance
 environmental monitoring
 de-commissioning bond

13. 13
OVERVIEW
 District scale property covering 2,954 sq km in SW
Greenland. 100% Owned
 Property covers 75km x 15km Greenland Norite Belt
(GNB) hosting numerous mineralized intrusions
 Greenfields project with significant Ni-Cu sulphide
intersections at widely spaced regional targets and
high grade Ni-Cu sulphides at the Imiak Hill Complex
(locally > 7% Ni)
 Systematic exploration benefits from high percentage
of outcrop and modern geophysical technologies

14. 14
DISTRICT SCALE
PROPERTY
Nova
MANIITSOQ
SUDBURY
FRASER
RANGE
0 10
km Ni mines
IHC
Pingo
P-053
P-030
P-013
P-058

15. 15
NAN - MANIITSOQ PROJECT HISTORY AND
CORPORATE FINANCING
Apr-Sept 2014
Field Program 3
incl. SPEM and gravity
surveys & 8,773m drilling
Sept-Oct 2011
SkyTEM survey
flown June-Sept 2012
Field Program 1
incl. VTEM survey &
1,550m drilling
May 2011
NAN listed
on TSXV;
Raises $3.2M
Aug 2011
Maniitsoq
Expl. License
Acquired
May 2012
$3.4M private
placement
June 2013
$7.05M private
placement
June-Sept 2013
Field Program 2
incl. VTEM survey &
4,266m drilling
May 2014
$9.38M private
placement
2011 2012 2013 2014
123.9m @ 0.81% Ni &
0.21% Cu
18.6m @ 4.31% Ni &
0.62% Cu
16.35m @ 2.51% Ni &
0.77% Cu

16. 16
GEOLOGY
Nickeliferous Mafic-Ultramafic
Intrusions
 Concentrated in a 75 x 15km curvilinear belt known
as the Greenland Norite Belt
 Norites, leuco-norites, pyroxenites & peridotites with
surface gossans
 Range in size from small dykes and plugs to
elongated bodies covering up to 8 km2
 Hybridized margins and xenoliths of partially
resorbed country rock are common
 Age dates of ~ 3.0 Ga
Country Rocks
 Mesoarchean gneisses of the North Atlantic Craton
 Mainly trondhjemitic-tonalitic-granodioritic (TTG)
and granitic gneisses
 Amphibolite and meta-sedimentary supracrustal
rocks
 Strongly deformed & metamorphosed

17. 17
EXPLORATION HISTORY (GNB) 1959 - 2000
1959 – 1973: Kryolitselskabet Øresund (KØ)
 Systematic prospecting from the air, shallow-looking
surface geophysics (< 50m) and diamond drilling (avg. <55 m)
 Surface nickel occurrences and nickel intersections in drilling:
 Fossilik II: 12.89m @ 2.24% Ni & 0.63% Cu
 Imiak Hill: 9.85m @ 2.67% Ni & 0.60% Cu
 Quagssuk: 4.95m @ 1.97% Ni & 0.43% Cu
No airborne EM, modern ground EM surveys
or borehole EM
1995: GEUS
 Commissioned Geoterrex to fly fixed wing GeoTEM survey
1995 – 1996: Cominco
 ground follow-up of airborne EM picks
 limited ground geophysics
1996 – 1998: Platinova and Monopros
 Diamond exploration incl. DIGHEM survey
1999 – 2000: Falconbridge Limited
 Prospecting & re-analysis of historical
drill core to confirm high grade assays and
establish nickel tenors
 Limited ground geophysics
No drilling by either Cominco or Falconbridge
= Selected Ni-Cu occurrence= Ni-Cu occurrence = Selected Ni
(See slide 31 for information about historical findings)

18. 18
PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGY
Helicopter-borne TDEM
Borehole TDEM
Surface EM & Gravity
The Past
 Prospecting, fixed wing airborne EM and shallow
surface geophysical surveys
 Successful at locating outcropping mineralization
but airborne EM surveys hampered by rugged
terrain
 Historical drilling was shallow and did not include
borehole EM
The Present
 Helicopter-borne EM surveys mantle the terrain
and can detect conductors not seen by historical
airborne EM surveys
 Surface gravity surveys potentially outline mafic-
ultramafic intrusions in the sub-surface
 Borehole EM increases “search radius” of drill
holes and helps target follow-up drilling
 14,589m of drilling: 2/3 at Imiak Hill 1/3 Regional
TDEM = Time Domain Electromagnetics

19. NEW GEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATIONS - SRK STUDY
New Structural & Lithological Interpretation
Goal was to define the structural framework of the project area to help understand the controls on the
property-scale distribution of the norite intrusions and, more locally, nickel sulphide mineralization.
19
1:500,000 Scale Geology Map

20. 20
NICKEL DEPORTMENT – QEMSCAN STUDIES
Majority of nickel resides in pentlandite:
 95.5 to 96.3% of all the nickel in the IHC samples
 90.1 to 93.1% of all nickel in the regional samples
Total potentially floatable pentlandite ranges from:
 96.3 to 97.6% in the IHC samples
 96.1 to 97.2% in the regional samples
QEMSCAN Image, P-30
Source: In-house Reports for NAN by SGS Lakefield Research Limited (June 2013 & Feb. 2015). See NAN website.
Scale bar = 1mm
 Results from IHC and regional samples support potential for high Ni recoveries
using conventional mineral processing methods:
QEMSCAN Image, Imiak Hill

21. 21
MANIITSOQ DRILLING HIGHLIGHTS:
P-149 (“Pingo”)
P-146 Imiak Hill Complex (IHC):
11.00m @ 3.07% Ni, 0.53% Cu
Incl. 3.25m @ 6.48% Ni, 0.29% Cu
P-058P-058
P-136
P-004
P-013
 High grade nickel sulphides at the
Imiak Hill Complex (IHC):
• Imiak Hill
• Mikissoq
• Spotty Hill
 Mineralized norite intersected at
8 regional locations ( ) in 2014
spanning entire length of norite belt
 Disseminated to massive
sulphides (Po-Pn-Cp-Py)
 High Ni tenors ranging from 4-12%
(in 100% sulphides)
P-053 P-030
8 regional locations ( ) in 2014
(See slide 31 for commentary on significant
technical information)

22. 22
IMIAK HILL COMPLEX (IHC)
TPM = Total Precious Metals (Pt+Pd+Au)
MQ-13-029:
9.99 m @ 4.65% Ni, 0.33% Cu
MQ-14-073:
61.35 m @ 0.63% Ni, 0.18% Cu
Incl. 6.56 m @ 1.59% Ni, 0.22% Cu
MQ-14-062:
66.00 m @ 0.61% Ni, 0.16% Cu, 0.22 g/t TPM
Incl. 8.55 m @ 2.98% Ni, 0.59% Cu, 0.86 g/t TPM
MQ-12-005:
24.2 m @ 1.75% Ni, 0.34% Cu, 0.52 g/t TPM
MQ-12-005:
24.2 m @ 1.75% Ni, 0.34% Cu, 0.52 g/t TPM
MQ-14-072 (Zone 10):
16.35 m @ 2.51% Ni, 0.77% Cu
MQ-13-026 (Zone 30):
18.62 m @ 4.31% Ni, 0.62% Cu
(See slide 31 for commentary on significant technical information)

23. 23
IHC SULPHIDE MINERALIZATION
 Sulphides range from
disseminated to net-textured to
semi-massive & massive
 Evidence of remobilization of
SMS and MS (breccias, veins,
stringers)
 Consists of pyrrhotite (Po), pentlandite (Pn),
chalcopyrite (Cp) and pyrite
 Often coarse-grained, possibly recrystallized
 Nickel primarily in pentlandite (95-96%)
MQ-14-037, Imiak Hill
11.03 m @ 3.07% Ni, 0.53% Cu, 0.08% Co
Incl. 3.25 m @ 6.48% Ni, 0.29% Cu, 0.17% Co
Po
Cp
Pn

24. 24
MANIITSOQ DRILLING HIGHLIGHTS:
P-149 (“Pingo”)
P-146
P-058 (“Fossilik”):
5.58m @ 1.72% Ni, 0.26% Cu
P-136
P-004
P-013:
11.00m @ 1.31% Ni, 0.15% Cu
Incl. 5.85m @ 2.07% Ni, 0.12% Cu
P-030:
20.10m @ 0.63% Ni, 0.20% Cu, 0.18 g/t TPM
 High grade nickel sulphides at the
Imiak Hill Complex (IHC):
• Imiak Hill
• Mikissoq
• Spotty Hill
 Mineralized norite intersected at
8 regional locations ( ) in 2014
spanning entire length of norite belt
 Disseminated to massive
sulphides (Po-Pn-Cp-Py)
 High Ni tenors ranging from 4-12%
(in 100% sulphides)
TPM = Total Precious Metals (Pt+Pd+Au)
Legend as in Slide #21
P-053:
3 high conductance off-hole
EM anomalies
(0.24m @ 0.85% Ni, 1.80% Cu)
Imiak Hill Complex
(IHC)
8 regional locations ( ) in 2014
(See slide 31 for commentary on significant
technical information)

25. 25
P-013
MQ-14-066
5.85m @ 2.07%Ni & 0.12% Cu
MQ-14-068
15.85m @ 0.87% Ni & 0.27% Cu
Incl. 3.40m @ 2.07% Ni & 0.34% Cu

26. MQ-14-071MQ
44,607S
10,206S
8,902S
194m
26
P-053
High Priority Regional Drilling Target
BHEM Survey Results
150ms fluxgate survey
 3 high conductance
BHEM anomalies
 Correlated with
mineralized norite
intersected in hole
MQ-14-071
0.24m @ 0.85% Ni & 1.80% Cu
Cpy-rich
Looking North

27. 27
2015 EXPLORATION PLAN
 OBJECTIVES
 Carry out systematic exploration of prospective norite trends
 Identify mineralized zones with tonnage potential
 Complete helicopter-borne EM surveying over target stratigraphy to develop new
regional targets
 DRILLING
 Follow-up of existing mineralization
 Down plunge extensions at Spotty and Mikissoq
 P-053, P-013, P-30, P-058 incl. borehole EM anomalies from 2014
 Test prioritized regional targets
 SYSTEMATIC EXPLORATION
Remote Sensing – Helicopter-borne VTEM – Surface Geophysics – Field Geology
 Planned satellite data acquisition to aid assessment of entire property
 Field checking of untested VTEM anomalies to prioritize drill targets
 Surface TDEM and gravity surveys over selected targets and mineralized intrusions
 Mapping, prospecting and sampling program

28. 28
PLANNED 2015
DRILLING
~ 6,000m, 1 Drill
June – September
Proposed 2015 Drill Targets
Mineralized norite
Norite
Other lithology or unknown
association
Legend
Legend

29. 29
PLANNED 2015
GEOPHYSICS
~ 6,700 line km of VTEM
~ 95 line km of Surface TDEM
Gravity Survey
June – July
Proposed 2015 Geophysics
Surface TDEM
2015 Helicopter VTEM Blocks
Current Helicopter VTEM Coverage
Legend
Legend

30. 30
SUMMARY: ADVANCED CAMP-SCALE NiS EXPLORATION
 FLAGSHIP ASSET - MANIITSOQ
 District scale property with widespread NiS
mineralization & high Ni tenors
 Located in south-west Greenland
 Seqi Port could provide deep water shipping access
 SYSTEMATIC EXPLORATION PROCESS
 Objective: Identify mineralized zones with tonnage
potential
 Refining exploration model & methodologies
 Large multi-component exploration and drill program
planned for 2015
 Continued exploration of entire property
 PEOPLE
 Experienced management & technical team
 In-house Ni sulphide expertise
 Strong cornerstone investor

31. 31
Scientific and Technical Information
Qualified Person
All technical information in this document has been reviewed by Patricia Tirschmann, P.Geo, V.P. Exploration, North American
Nickel Inc., who is the Qualified Person for the Company.
Further Information
For further information about the drilling results described herein, please see the press releases of the Company dated
November 17, 2014, titled "North American Nickel Reports High Grade Nickel Sulphides at Imiak Hill"; November 11, 2014,
titled "North American Nickel Reports New Nickel Sulphide-Discoveries From Southern Coastal Zone at Maniitsoq";
November 3, 2014, titled "North American Nickel Reports New Multiple and Significant Nickel Sulphide Intersections
at Maniitsoq"; October 20, 2014, titled "North American Nickel Reports Assays of 2.98% Ni, 0.59% Cu & 0.86 g/t PGM Over
8.55 Metres at Spotty Hill"; and September 29, 2014, titled "North American Nickel Reports Assays From New Discoveries“;
October 23, 2013, titled “North American Nickel Inc.: Discovery of High Grade Nickel Sulphide Mineralization at Imiak Hill;
October 10, 2013, titled “ North American Nickel Inc.: High Grade Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Sulphides Confirmed at Imiak Hill;
December 3, 2014, titled “North American Nickel Inc.: New Discovery of High Grade Nickel Copper Cobalt PGM
Sulphide Mineralization at the Maniitsoq Project in Greenland”.
Historic Data
Certain historic drilling data is summarized in this document. This data related to surface nickel occurrences in drilling
conducted between 1959 and 1973 (Kryolitselsabet Øresund A/S Prospektering, Report on the Exploration Work in Søndre
Isortoq Area, 1968 by J. Kurki and S. Turkka, GEUS Report File no. 20158). The Company has reviewed this prior work and
believes that it continues to be relevant and reliable as an indication of the potential for ongoing exploration efforts, but notes
that it does not constitute current drilling reporting and will be replaced entirely by drilling underway, including that recently
completed and referenced in this document.

32. 32
Contact Info: North American Nickel Inc.
500 – 200 W. Esplanade
North Vancouver, BC, Canada V7M 1A4
Phone: +1 604-986-202
Fax: +1 604-986-2021
Toll Free: 1-866-816-0118
info@northamericannickel.com