This document discusses the use of total elbow arthroplasty as a salvage procedure for nonunion or malunion of distal humeral fractures. It summarizes that distal humeral fractures are challenging to treat due to the complex anatomy and common comminution. Nonunion or malunion can occur in 2-10% of cases after open reduction and internal fixation and result in pain, instability and loss of function. Total elbow arthroplasty can be considered for cases with poor bone stock or articular destruction when revision fixation is not possible. The document presents results from 12 patients who underwent total elbow arthroplasty with generally good pain relief, range of motion and function, though complication rates were high.
Russian Call Girls in Pune Riya 9907093804 Short 1500 Night 6000 Best call gi...
Total Elbow Arthroplasty As The Salvage procedure of Nonunion or Malunion of Distal Humeral Fracture
1. 彰基骨科
Total Elbow Arthroplasty As The
Salvage procedure of Nonunion or
Malunion of Distal Humeral Fracture
JUI-KUO HUNG MD.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Changhua Christian Hospital, Taiwan
2. 彰基骨科
Distal Humeral Fracture
• 1~2% of adult fractures
• 1/3 of humeral fractures
– Low energy trauma in elderly
– High energy trauma in young
• Treatment challenge
– Complex anatomy and common comminution
• Anatomic reduction: therapeutic goal
– Splinting, casting
– Open reduction and internal fixation
4. 彰基骨科
Nonunion and Malunion
• 2% ~10% after open reduction and internal
fixation
• Causes
– Complex fracture, poor bone quality, soft tissue
lesions, bad patient and implants selection
• Resulting
– Marked instability, pain, strength loss and
significant functional limitation
5. 彰基骨科
Nonunion and Malunion
-- Management --
• Open reduction and internal fixation with
bone-grafting
– Most often recommended
• Allograft reconstruction
• Distraction arthroplasty
• Total elbow arthroplasty
– Poor bone stock
– Severe destruction of articular surface
6. 彰基骨科
Total Elbow Arthroplasty
• Poor results with highly constrained or
custom joint implants
• Modern linked semiconstrained implants
– Undisturbed extensor mechanism
– Reliably restored stability
– Predictable range of motion
– Minimal pain and limited motion
13. 彰基骨科
Mayo Elbow Performance Score
(MEPS)
• ≧90 Excellent
• 75~89 Good
• 60~74 Fair
• <60 Poor
Function Point
Pain 45
Daily functional activities 25
Motion 20
Stability 10
14. 彰基骨科
Implant Loosening
Type 0
A radiolucent line <1mm thick, involves < 50% of the interface
Type 1
A radiolucent line is 1 mm thick, involves < 50% of the interface
Type 2
A radiolucent line >1mm thick, involves > 50% of the interface
Type 3
A radiolucent line >2mm thick, involves 100% of the interface
Type 4
Gross loosening
16. 彰基骨科
Complication
• Transient ulnar paresthesia
– 6 patients, remission 3~6 months
• Superficial wound infection
– 3 patients
– Improved after wound care and debridement
• Well implant position
• Inadequate cement infiltration
– 4 patient
• 1 had type 4 septic loosening one year later
• No implant-related complication
19. 彰基骨科
One Patient with Gross Loosening
• 72 Y/O, male
• Deep infection 1 year later
• Post-OP 13 months
• Humeral stem loosening
due to infection
• Management
– Revision TEA at other
clinic
25. 彰基骨科
Management of Nonunion and Malunion
• ORIF with bone-grafting
– Most often recommended
– Difficulty in poor bone stock patients
• Allograft reconstruction
– Graft resorption, infection, nonunion
• Distraction arthroplasty
– Technically demanding
– High rate of complication
– Inconsistent outcome
• Total elbow arthroplasty
– Increase success rate with new designed implants
26. 彰基骨科
Open Reduction and Internal
Fixation with Bone-Grafting
• Most recommended
method
• Long term disability
– Residual elbow
stiffness and pain
• Improved outcome
– New designed fixation
implants
– Elbow capsulectomy
• Helfet et al. JBJSB 2003
• 52 Nonunion/Malunion
• 98% union rate
• Union time 6 months
• 94° ROM
• 15 (29%)
– Reoperation
– Prominent hardware
27. 彰基骨科
Total Elbow Arthroplasty
• Poor bone stock and destruction of joint
• Modern linked semiconstrained implants
• Advantages
– Undisturbed extensor mechanism
– Reliably restored stability
– Predictable range of motion
– Minimal pain and limited motion
• Disadvantage
– Implant-related complications
– Limit use of the upper extremity
28. 彰基骨科
Implants Loosening and
Component Fracture
• Infection
• Poor implants position
• Inadequate cementing technique
• Use of pre-coated ulnar component
• Patient’s in-cooperation about weight-lifting
restriction
– Increase bushing wear
– Components fracture
29. 彰基骨科
Linked Elbow Replacement: A Salvage
Procedure for Distal Humeral Nonunion
• Akin Cil, Bernard F. Morrey. et al JBJSA 2008
• 1982~2003, 92 patients, 65Y/O (22~84)
• 85% with excellent/good MEPS
• 74% no pain or mild pain
• 23 (25%) with revision TEA or removal of
implant
– Comparable with ORIF-patients
30. 彰基骨科
Linked Elbow Replacement: A Salvage
Procedure for Distal Humeral Nonunion
• Risk factors of implant failure
– Age < 65Y/O
– > 2 prior surgical procedures
– History of infection
• Rate of prosthesis survival
F/U Years Survival
2 years 96%
5 Years 82%
10~15 Years 65%
31. 彰基骨科
Distal Humerus Nonunion after Failed Internal Fixation:
Reconstruction with Total Elbow Arthroplasty
• LaPorte et al. AM J Orthop. 2008
• 12 patients, 63 months F/U
• 11 patients with good pain relief
• Mean total arc 117 °
• 75% complication rate
– Most are soft tissue problems
– No need for revision TEA
32. 彰基骨科
Total Elbow Arthroplasty as Primary Treatment for
Distal Humeral Fractures in Elderly Patients
• Ray P.S. et al. Injury 2000
• 7 patients, 81.7Y/O, 48 months F/U
• 6 patients with no pain, one had mild pain
• Mean arc 20-130 °
• MEPS 5 is excellent, 2 is good
• 1 patients had superficial infection
• No need re-operatoion
• Conclusion
– Good short-term results
– For selected comminuted distal humeral fracture
33. 彰基骨科
Summary
• Treatment challenge
• ORIF with bone-grafting
– Treatment of choice if possible
• Total elbow arthroplasty
– Poor bone stock and joint destruction
– Good short-term result, long term result?
– High complication rate
– Patient selection is crucial