The Controversy:
SITE of the First Mass
READINGS IN PHILIPPINE HISTORY 1
Where is the First Mass?
•Butuan (Masao) in Agusan Del Norte
•Limasawa in Southern Leyte
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 2
Limasawa, Southern
Leyte
3
Butuan City, Agusan
Del Norte
4
WHY BUTUAN?
• It was a tradition believed by many from 17th to 19th
Century;
• Father Francisco Collin S.J. – published Labor
Evangelica in 1663
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 5
WHY BUTUAN?
• Father Francisco
Combres S.J. (1620-1665)
– published Historia de
Mindanao y Jolo in 1667)
• Gave somewhat a
different version of the
route
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 6
WHY BUTUAN?
• Continuation…
• Did not
mentioned of the
First Mass
• Both Colin and
Combres had
strong influence
over the next
writers
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 7
COLIN VS. COMBRES ACCOUNTS
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 8
C O L I N
Homonhon Butuan Limasawa Cebu
C O M B E S
Limasawa Butuan Limasawa Cebu
WHY BUTUAN?
• By 18th Century, one of the passage in Colin’s book
was misunderstood; perceived that Magellan
entered PH waters through Siargao Strait,
concluded that:
Magellan must have come by the southern route
• These errors repeated the errors and influenced
many writers by the later 18th and the 19th Century
• By 19th Century, the site of the first mass was
“taken for granted” mentioned and copied writer
after writer, copying from the previous and copied
by those who came after.
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 9
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 10
Set of Evidences Presented for
BUTUAN
Considered in the Panel Examination and study of NHCP led by Dr. Resil Mojares
• 1581 Edict of Bishop Domingo Salazar, the Anales ecclesiasticos de Filipinas 1574-
1683;
• 1886 Breve reseña de diocesis de Cebu
• Fr. Francisco Colin’s Labor evangélica: Ministerios apostolicos de los obreros de la
Compaña de Jesus (1663);
• Fr. Francisco Combés’ Historia de Mindanao y Jolo (1667);
• Fray Gaspar de San Agustin’s Conquistas de las Islas Filipinas (1698);
• 1872 monument in Magallanes, Agusan del Norte;
• and a few other accounts written by American authors in the early part of the
20th century.
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 11
1872 Butuan Marker
12
Bernad, Miguel A. S.J. - “Butuan or Limasawa? The Site of the First Mass in the Philippines:
A Reexamination of the Evidences”
Scott, William Henry - “Why then the Butuan Tradition?”
• Butuan tradition was the result of the reliance of early historians
on Gian Battista Ramusio’s 3-volume Delle navigationi et viaggi
(1550) and Maximilianus Transylvanus’ De Moluccis Insulis.
• Ramusio and Transylvanus recounted the voyage of the Magellan-
Elcano expedition based on the accounts of the survivors;
became the most dominant and authoritative source of
information aused as basis of recounting some events connected
to the first circumnavigation of the world
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 13
Shift to Limasawa
• The shift was caused by the rediscovery of the
Pigafetta and Albo’s Accounts
• Trinidad Pardo de Tavera – wrote El Comercio on 31
March 1895; stated that the Butuan tradition was a
mistake.
• Pablo Pastells, SJ – while working on Colin’s work,
studied Pigafetta and Albo’s notes; wrote:
“Magellan did not go to Butuan. Rather, from the
island of Limasawa he proceeded to Cebu.”
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 14
Shift to Limasawa
• Emma Blair and James Alexander Robertson’s
translation of Pigafetta’s Accounts (written on the
55 Volume The Philippine Island) - wrote that
according to Pigafetta, the 1521 Easter Sunday
mass was held in an island called Mazaua; provided a
footnote that the present name of the place is
Limasawa.
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 15
Examining the Site of
the First Mass
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• Pigafetta’s Accounts
• Albo’s Accounts
• The question of omission
• Limasawa has no spices?
• Mazaua Coordinates
• Other confirmatory evidences
16
Pigafetta’s Accounts
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
Date Event Location
March 16, 1521 Reached the isle of Zamal. Samar
March 17, 1521 Landed on another
uninhabited Island.
Homonhon
March 18, 1521 Natives came with a boat
of nine men and the chief;
exchange of goods
Homonhon
(Humunu);
Acquad da li buoni
Segnialli (The
Watering-place of
Good Signs)
March 22, 1521 Natives came back,
bringing more goods
17
Pigafetta’s Accounts
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• Magellan’s fleet stayed EIGHT DAYS at Homonhon:
from March 17, to March 25;
• March 25 – Left Homonhon towards the west
southwest, between four islands: namely, Cenalo,
Hiunanghan, Ibusson and Albarien.
• Bernad (1981) clarifies:
• Cenalo – misspelled in the Italian manuscript,
referring to Ceilon (Leyte)
• Hiunanghan – Hinunangan, perceived as a
separate ishand
• Ibusson – Hibuson, southern tip of Leyte
18
Pigafetta’s Accounts
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• Thursday, 28 March –anchored off and island where
the previous night they had seen a light or a
bonfire;
• “lies in a latitude of nine and two-thirds towards
the Artic Pole (i.e. North) and in a longitude of one
hundred and sixty-two degrees from the line of
demarcation. It is 25 leagues from the Acquada,
and is called MAZAUA
19
Pigafetta’s Accounts
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• Friday, March 29 – sent the slave interpreter
ashore in a small boat to ask the king if he could
provide the expedition with food supplies, and to
say that they had come as friends and not as
enemies; in reply the king himself came in a boat
with six or eight men, and this time went up
Magellan’s ship and the two men embraced.
Another exchange of gifts was made. The native
king and his companions returned ashore, bringing
with them two members of Magellan’s expedition
as guests for the night
20
Pigafetta’s Accounts
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• Saturday, March 30 – Pigafetta and his companions
had spent the previous evening feasting and
drinking with the native king and his son. Pigafetta
deplored the fact that, although it was Good
Friday, they have to eat meat. The following
morning (Saturday), Pigafetta and his companion
took leave of their host and returned to the ships.
21
Pigafetta’s Accounts
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
Early on the morning of Sunday, the last of March, and Easter-day, the
captain- general sent the priest with some men to prepare the place where
mass was to be said; together with the interpreter to tell the king that we
were not going to land in order to dine with him, but to say mass.
Therefore, the king sent us two swine that he had had killed. When the hour
for mass arrived, we landed with about fifty men, without our body armor,
but carrying our other arms, and dressed in our best clothes. Before we
reached the shore with our boats, six pieces were discharged as a sign of
peace. We landed; the two kings embraced the captain-general, and placed
him between them. We went in marching order to the place consecrated,
which was not far from the shore.
22
Pigafetta’s Accounts
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
Before the commencement of mass, the captain sprinkled the entire bodies
of the two kings with musk water. The mass was offered up. The kings went
forward to kiss the cross as we did, but they did not offer the sacrifice.
When the body of our Lord was elevated, they remained on their knees and
worshiped Him with clasped hands. The ships fired all their artillery at
once when the body of Christ was elevated, the signal having been given
from the shore with muskets. After the conclusion of mass, some of our men
took communion.
23
Pigafetta’s Accounts
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
Then he had a cross carried in and the nails and a crown, to which
immediate reverence was made. He told the kings through the interpreter
that they were the standards given to him by the emperor his sovereign, so
that wherever he might go he might set up those his tokens. [He said] that
he wished to set it up in that place for their benefit, for whenever any of
our ships came, they would know that we had been there by that cross, and
would do nothing to displease them or harm their property If any of their
men were captured, they would be set free immediately on that sign being
shown. It was necessary to set that cross on the summit of the highest
mountain, so that on seeing it every morning, they might adore it; and if
they did that, neither thunder, lightning, nor storms would harm them in
the least.
24
Pigafetta’s Accounts
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• Sunday, March 31 – While on the summit of the
highest hill, Magellan asked the two kings which
ports he should go to obtain more abundant
supplies of food; they replied that there were three
ports to choose from: Ceylon, Zubu and Calagan. Of
the three, Zubu was the port with the most trade.
Magellan then said that he wished to go to Zubu
and to depart the following morning.
• Thursday, 4 April. – they left Mazaua, bound for
Cebu. They were guided thither by the king of
Mazaua who sailed in his own boat. Their route
took them past five “islands”: namely, Ceylon,
Bohol, Canighan, Baibai and Gatignan.”
25
ALBO’s Account
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• March 16 - sailed in a westerly course from the
Ladrones, saw land towards the northwest; but
owing to many shallow places they did not
approach; its name was Yungan.
• went instead southwards to another small island
named Suluan, and there they anchored. There
they saw some canoes but these fled at the
Spaniard’s approach. This island was at 9 and two
thirds degrees North Altitude.
Bernad, Miguel A. (1981)
26
Francisco Albo
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• Francisco Albo was one of the 18 survivors of
the Magellan-Elcano Expedition.
• He was the contramaestre or pilot of the
ship, Trinidad, which was the flagship of
Ferdinand Magellan.
• He had kept a log book of their expedition
which bad also accounted their travels in
the Philippines.
27
ALBO’s Account
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• Departing from those two islands, they sailed
westwards to an uninhabited island of “Gada”
where they took in a supply of wood and water.
The sea around that island was free from shallows.
• Albo does not give the latitude of this island, but
from Pigafetta’s testimony, this seems to be the
“Acquada” or Homonhon, at 10 degrees North
latitude.
Bernad, Miguel A. (1981)
28
ALBO’s Account
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• From that island, they sailed westwards towards a
large island named Seilani, which was inhabited and
was known to have gold. (Seilani - or, as Pigafetta
calls it, “Ceylon” – was the island of Leyte)
• Sailing southwards along the coast of that large
island of Seilani, they turned southwest to a small
island called “Mazava”. That island is also at a
latitude of 9 and two-thirds degrees North.
Bernad, Miguel A. (1981)
29
ALBO’s Account
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• The people of that island of Mazava were very
good. There the Spaniards planted a cross upon a
mountain-top, and from there they were shown
three islands to the west and southwest, where
they were told there was much gold. “They
showed us how the gold was gathered, which came
in small pieces like peas and lentils.”
Bernad, Miguel A. (1981)
30
ALBO’s Account
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• From Mazava, they sailed northwards again
towards Seilani. They followed the coast of Seilani
in a northwesterly direction, ascending up to 10
degrees of latitude where they saw three small
islands.
• From there they sailed westwards some the
leagues, and there they saw three islets, where
they dropped anchor for the night.
Bernad, Miguel A. (1981)
31
Summary of Pigafetta and ALBO’s
Account
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
1. Magellan’s expedition entered PH waters where south of
the island od Samar and dropped anchor at Homonhon they
stayed a week. Then they sailed westward towards Leyte
and then southwards parallel to the eastern coast of that
island and that of the adjoining island of Panaon. Rounding
the southern tip of the latter, they anchored off the
eastern shore of a small island called Mazaua. There they
stayed a week, during which on Easter Sunday they
celebrated Mass and planted a cross on the summit of the
highest hill.
Bernad, Miguel A. (1981)
32
Summary of Pigafetta and ALBO’s
Account
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
2. The island of Mazaua lies at a latitude of 9 2/3 degress
North. Its position (south of Leyte) and its latitude
correspond to the position and latitude of the island of
Limasawa, whose southern tip lies at 9 degress and 54
minutes North.
3. From there, the expedition sailed northwestwards through
the Canigao channel between Bohol and Leyte, then
northwards parallel to the eastern coast of this latter
island, then they sailed westwards to the Camotes Group
and from there southwestwards to Cebu.
Bernad, Miguel A. (1981)
33
Summary of Pigafetta and ALBO’s
Account
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
4. At no point in that itinerary did the Magellan expedition go
to Butuan or any other point on the Mindanao coast. The
survivors of the expedition did go to Mondanao later, but
after Magellan’s death.
Bernad, Miguel A. (1981)
34
Magellan’s
Route
Limasawa
Butuan
35
Intentional Concealing?
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• Dr. Potenciano Malvar - argued that Pigafetta’s
recorded latitude measurement (9°2/3’N) was part
of a plan of Magellan and King Charles I to conceal
the site of the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass to ensure
that the newly-discovered route to the Moluccas
would remain hidden from other explorers.
• The panel argued that if it’s true, the part of the
route that should remain secret should be the
coordinates from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific
Ocean via the southern tip of South America. and
not that of the Philippines.
NHCP’s Latest Ruling on the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass Controversy, Escalante
36
Limasawa has no Spices?
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• Pro-Butuan proponents argued that Limasawa was
a remote island and cannot sustain the daily needs
of the members of the expedition. Butuan, on the
other hand, is a highly civilized settlement as
proven by a lot of archeological discoveries in this
part of Mindanao.
• point out that Limasawa did not have the
necessary provisions that could sustain the
expedition for seven days
NHCP’s Latest Ruling on the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass Controversy, Escalante
37
Limasawa has no Spices?
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• Villalobos Expedition – said It stayed in Limasawa
for two months and there are no accounts that
they had problems while waiting to be connected
with the fleet. This only suggests that 16th
century Limasawa was prosperous enough to host
foreign visitors.
• The panel also asked “if Butuan was the place
where the First Mass was celebrated and it was
highly civilized during the 16th century, how come
it did not become the prime destination of the
expeditions that followed Magellan?”
NHCP’s Latest Ruling on the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass Controversy, Escalante
38
Mazaua Coordinates
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• The panel scrutinized the coordinates of
Mazaua given by the eyewitnesses and
compared them with contemporary
measurements.
• Pigafetta (9 2/3 or 9º40’N latitude)
• Albo (9 1 /3 or 9º20’N latitude)
• Genoese Pilot (9 or 9º00’N latitude)
NHCP’s Latest Ruling on the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass Controversy, Escalante
39
Mazaua Coordinates
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
• A study presented in the 16th International
Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference
(Bulgaria, 2016) compared Pigafetta’s
coordinates to the present coordinate
system; Result was 9⁰56’ N latitude or only a
0⁰16’ difference against Pigafetta’s
• Noted that even these coordinates were
estimates, it was still closer to Limasawa
than to Butuan which, using the modern
coordinates, was located at 8°56’ N latitude.
NHCP’s Latest Ruling on the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass Controversy, Escalante
40
Final Verdict
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
“…that Limasawa Island, Southern
Leyte, be sustained as the site of the
1521 Easter Sunday Mass.”
NHCP’s Latest Ruling on the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass Controversy, Escalante
41
42
43
Resources:
The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS
Alporha, V. C. (2018). Readings in Philippine History (First ed.). Manila: Rex Book
Store.
Bernad, M. A. (2002). Butuan or Limasawa: The Site of the First Mass in the
Philippines: A Reexaminationof the Evidence. Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and
Culture, 5, 133-166. Retrieved from
https://journals.ateneo.edu/ojs/index.php/budhi/article/view/582/579
Escalante, R. R. (2020). NHCP’s Latest Ruling on the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass
Controversy. National Historical Commission of the Philippines. Retrieved from
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mExTClwb_z7AMjS3Hvpds75WLoKLNnYh/view
History. (2018). Retrieved from New World Encyclopedia:
https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/History
44

The_Site_of_the_First_Mass_in_Philippines.pdf

  • 1.
    The Controversy: SITE ofthe First Mass READINGS IN PHILIPPINE HISTORY 1
  • 2.
    Where is theFirst Mass? •Butuan (Masao) in Agusan Del Norte •Limasawa in Southern Leyte The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 2
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
    WHY BUTUAN? • Itwas a tradition believed by many from 17th to 19th Century; • Father Francisco Collin S.J. – published Labor Evangelica in 1663 The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 5
  • 6.
    WHY BUTUAN? • FatherFrancisco Combres S.J. (1620-1665) – published Historia de Mindanao y Jolo in 1667) • Gave somewhat a different version of the route The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 6
  • 7.
    WHY BUTUAN? • Continuation… •Did not mentioned of the First Mass • Both Colin and Combres had strong influence over the next writers The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 7
  • 8.
    COLIN VS. COMBRESACCOUNTS The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 8 C O L I N Homonhon Butuan Limasawa Cebu C O M B E S Limasawa Butuan Limasawa Cebu
  • 9.
    WHY BUTUAN? • By18th Century, one of the passage in Colin’s book was misunderstood; perceived that Magellan entered PH waters through Siargao Strait, concluded that: Magellan must have come by the southern route • These errors repeated the errors and influenced many writers by the later 18th and the 19th Century • By 19th Century, the site of the first mass was “taken for granted” mentioned and copied writer after writer, copying from the previous and copied by those who came after. The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 9
  • 10.
    The Controversy: SITEOF THE FIRST MASS 10
  • 11.
    Set of EvidencesPresented for BUTUAN Considered in the Panel Examination and study of NHCP led by Dr. Resil Mojares • 1581 Edict of Bishop Domingo Salazar, the Anales ecclesiasticos de Filipinas 1574- 1683; • 1886 Breve reseña de diocesis de Cebu • Fr. Francisco Colin’s Labor evangélica: Ministerios apostolicos de los obreros de la Compaña de Jesus (1663); • Fr. Francisco Combés’ Historia de Mindanao y Jolo (1667); • Fray Gaspar de San Agustin’s Conquistas de las Islas Filipinas (1698); • 1872 monument in Magallanes, Agusan del Norte; • and a few other accounts written by American authors in the early part of the 20th century. The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 11
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Bernad, Miguel A.S.J. - “Butuan or Limasawa? The Site of the First Mass in the Philippines: A Reexamination of the Evidences” Scott, William Henry - “Why then the Butuan Tradition?” • Butuan tradition was the result of the reliance of early historians on Gian Battista Ramusio’s 3-volume Delle navigationi et viaggi (1550) and Maximilianus Transylvanus’ De Moluccis Insulis. • Ramusio and Transylvanus recounted the voyage of the Magellan- Elcano expedition based on the accounts of the survivors; became the most dominant and authoritative source of information aused as basis of recounting some events connected to the first circumnavigation of the world The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 13
  • 14.
    Shift to Limasawa •The shift was caused by the rediscovery of the Pigafetta and Albo’s Accounts • Trinidad Pardo de Tavera – wrote El Comercio on 31 March 1895; stated that the Butuan tradition was a mistake. • Pablo Pastells, SJ – while working on Colin’s work, studied Pigafetta and Albo’s notes; wrote: “Magellan did not go to Butuan. Rather, from the island of Limasawa he proceeded to Cebu.” The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 14
  • 15.
    Shift to Limasawa •Emma Blair and James Alexander Robertson’s translation of Pigafetta’s Accounts (written on the 55 Volume The Philippine Island) - wrote that according to Pigafetta, the 1521 Easter Sunday mass was held in an island called Mazaua; provided a footnote that the present name of the place is Limasawa. The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 15
  • 16.
    Examining the Siteof the First Mass The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • Pigafetta’s Accounts • Albo’s Accounts • The question of omission • Limasawa has no spices? • Mazaua Coordinates • Other confirmatory evidences 16
  • 17.
    Pigafetta’s Accounts The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS Date Event Location March 16, 1521 Reached the isle of Zamal. Samar March 17, 1521 Landed on another uninhabited Island. Homonhon March 18, 1521 Natives came with a boat of nine men and the chief; exchange of goods Homonhon (Humunu); Acquad da li buoni Segnialli (The Watering-place of Good Signs) March 22, 1521 Natives came back, bringing more goods 17
  • 18.
    Pigafetta’s Accounts The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • Magellan’s fleet stayed EIGHT DAYS at Homonhon: from March 17, to March 25; • March 25 – Left Homonhon towards the west southwest, between four islands: namely, Cenalo, Hiunanghan, Ibusson and Albarien. • Bernad (1981) clarifies: • Cenalo – misspelled in the Italian manuscript, referring to Ceilon (Leyte) • Hiunanghan – Hinunangan, perceived as a separate ishand • Ibusson – Hibuson, southern tip of Leyte 18
  • 19.
    Pigafetta’s Accounts The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • Thursday, 28 March –anchored off and island where the previous night they had seen a light or a bonfire; • “lies in a latitude of nine and two-thirds towards the Artic Pole (i.e. North) and in a longitude of one hundred and sixty-two degrees from the line of demarcation. It is 25 leagues from the Acquada, and is called MAZAUA 19
  • 20.
    Pigafetta’s Accounts The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • Friday, March 29 – sent the slave interpreter ashore in a small boat to ask the king if he could provide the expedition with food supplies, and to say that they had come as friends and not as enemies; in reply the king himself came in a boat with six or eight men, and this time went up Magellan’s ship and the two men embraced. Another exchange of gifts was made. The native king and his companions returned ashore, bringing with them two members of Magellan’s expedition as guests for the night 20
  • 21.
    Pigafetta’s Accounts The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • Saturday, March 30 – Pigafetta and his companions had spent the previous evening feasting and drinking with the native king and his son. Pigafetta deplored the fact that, although it was Good Friday, they have to eat meat. The following morning (Saturday), Pigafetta and his companion took leave of their host and returned to the ships. 21
  • 22.
    Pigafetta’s Accounts The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS Early on the morning of Sunday, the last of March, and Easter-day, the captain- general sent the priest with some men to prepare the place where mass was to be said; together with the interpreter to tell the king that we were not going to land in order to dine with him, but to say mass. Therefore, the king sent us two swine that he had had killed. When the hour for mass arrived, we landed with about fifty men, without our body armor, but carrying our other arms, and dressed in our best clothes. Before we reached the shore with our boats, six pieces were discharged as a sign of peace. We landed; the two kings embraced the captain-general, and placed him between them. We went in marching order to the place consecrated, which was not far from the shore. 22
  • 23.
    Pigafetta’s Accounts The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS Before the commencement of mass, the captain sprinkled the entire bodies of the two kings with musk water. The mass was offered up. The kings went forward to kiss the cross as we did, but they did not offer the sacrifice. When the body of our Lord was elevated, they remained on their knees and worshiped Him with clasped hands. The ships fired all their artillery at once when the body of Christ was elevated, the signal having been given from the shore with muskets. After the conclusion of mass, some of our men took communion. 23
  • 24.
    Pigafetta’s Accounts The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS Then he had a cross carried in and the nails and a crown, to which immediate reverence was made. He told the kings through the interpreter that they were the standards given to him by the emperor his sovereign, so that wherever he might go he might set up those his tokens. [He said] that he wished to set it up in that place for their benefit, for whenever any of our ships came, they would know that we had been there by that cross, and would do nothing to displease them or harm their property If any of their men were captured, they would be set free immediately on that sign being shown. It was necessary to set that cross on the summit of the highest mountain, so that on seeing it every morning, they might adore it; and if they did that, neither thunder, lightning, nor storms would harm them in the least. 24
  • 25.
    Pigafetta’s Accounts The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • Sunday, March 31 – While on the summit of the highest hill, Magellan asked the two kings which ports he should go to obtain more abundant supplies of food; they replied that there were three ports to choose from: Ceylon, Zubu and Calagan. Of the three, Zubu was the port with the most trade. Magellan then said that he wished to go to Zubu and to depart the following morning. • Thursday, 4 April. – they left Mazaua, bound for Cebu. They were guided thither by the king of Mazaua who sailed in his own boat. Their route took them past five “islands”: namely, Ceylon, Bohol, Canighan, Baibai and Gatignan.” 25
  • 26.
    ALBO’s Account The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • March 16 - sailed in a westerly course from the Ladrones, saw land towards the northwest; but owing to many shallow places they did not approach; its name was Yungan. • went instead southwards to another small island named Suluan, and there they anchored. There they saw some canoes but these fled at the Spaniard’s approach. This island was at 9 and two thirds degrees North Altitude. Bernad, Miguel A. (1981) 26
  • 27.
    Francisco Albo The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • Francisco Albo was one of the 18 survivors of the Magellan-Elcano Expedition. • He was the contramaestre or pilot of the ship, Trinidad, which was the flagship of Ferdinand Magellan. • He had kept a log book of their expedition which bad also accounted their travels in the Philippines. 27
  • 28.
    ALBO’s Account The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • Departing from those two islands, they sailed westwards to an uninhabited island of “Gada” where they took in a supply of wood and water. The sea around that island was free from shallows. • Albo does not give the latitude of this island, but from Pigafetta’s testimony, this seems to be the “Acquada” or Homonhon, at 10 degrees North latitude. Bernad, Miguel A. (1981) 28
  • 29.
    ALBO’s Account The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • From that island, they sailed westwards towards a large island named Seilani, which was inhabited and was known to have gold. (Seilani - or, as Pigafetta calls it, “Ceylon” – was the island of Leyte) • Sailing southwards along the coast of that large island of Seilani, they turned southwest to a small island called “Mazava”. That island is also at a latitude of 9 and two-thirds degrees North. Bernad, Miguel A. (1981) 29
  • 30.
    ALBO’s Account The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • The people of that island of Mazava were very good. There the Spaniards planted a cross upon a mountain-top, and from there they were shown three islands to the west and southwest, where they were told there was much gold. “They showed us how the gold was gathered, which came in small pieces like peas and lentils.” Bernad, Miguel A. (1981) 30
  • 31.
    ALBO’s Account The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • From Mazava, they sailed northwards again towards Seilani. They followed the coast of Seilani in a northwesterly direction, ascending up to 10 degrees of latitude where they saw three small islands. • From there they sailed westwards some the leagues, and there they saw three islets, where they dropped anchor for the night. Bernad, Miguel A. (1981) 31
  • 32.
    Summary of Pigafettaand ALBO’s Account The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 1. Magellan’s expedition entered PH waters where south of the island od Samar and dropped anchor at Homonhon they stayed a week. Then they sailed westward towards Leyte and then southwards parallel to the eastern coast of that island and that of the adjoining island of Panaon. Rounding the southern tip of the latter, they anchored off the eastern shore of a small island called Mazaua. There they stayed a week, during which on Easter Sunday they celebrated Mass and planted a cross on the summit of the highest hill. Bernad, Miguel A. (1981) 32
  • 33.
    Summary of Pigafettaand ALBO’s Account The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 2. The island of Mazaua lies at a latitude of 9 2/3 degress North. Its position (south of Leyte) and its latitude correspond to the position and latitude of the island of Limasawa, whose southern tip lies at 9 degress and 54 minutes North. 3. From there, the expedition sailed northwestwards through the Canigao channel between Bohol and Leyte, then northwards parallel to the eastern coast of this latter island, then they sailed westwards to the Camotes Group and from there southwestwards to Cebu. Bernad, Miguel A. (1981) 33
  • 34.
    Summary of Pigafettaand ALBO’s Account The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS 4. At no point in that itinerary did the Magellan expedition go to Butuan or any other point on the Mindanao coast. The survivors of the expedition did go to Mondanao later, but after Magellan’s death. Bernad, Miguel A. (1981) 34
  • 35.
  • 36.
    Intentional Concealing? The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • Dr. Potenciano Malvar - argued that Pigafetta’s recorded latitude measurement (9°2/3’N) was part of a plan of Magellan and King Charles I to conceal the site of the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass to ensure that the newly-discovered route to the Moluccas would remain hidden from other explorers. • The panel argued that if it’s true, the part of the route that should remain secret should be the coordinates from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean via the southern tip of South America. and not that of the Philippines. NHCP’s Latest Ruling on the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass Controversy, Escalante 36
  • 37.
    Limasawa has noSpices? The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • Pro-Butuan proponents argued that Limasawa was a remote island and cannot sustain the daily needs of the members of the expedition. Butuan, on the other hand, is a highly civilized settlement as proven by a lot of archeological discoveries in this part of Mindanao. • point out that Limasawa did not have the necessary provisions that could sustain the expedition for seven days NHCP’s Latest Ruling on the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass Controversy, Escalante 37
  • 38.
    Limasawa has noSpices? The Controversy: SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • Villalobos Expedition – said It stayed in Limasawa for two months and there are no accounts that they had problems while waiting to be connected with the fleet. This only suggests that 16th century Limasawa was prosperous enough to host foreign visitors. • The panel also asked “if Butuan was the place where the First Mass was celebrated and it was highly civilized during the 16th century, how come it did not become the prime destination of the expeditions that followed Magellan?” NHCP’s Latest Ruling on the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass Controversy, Escalante 38
  • 39.
    Mazaua Coordinates The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • The panel scrutinized the coordinates of Mazaua given by the eyewitnesses and compared them with contemporary measurements. • Pigafetta (9 2/3 or 9º40’N latitude) • Albo (9 1 /3 or 9º20’N latitude) • Genoese Pilot (9 or 9º00’N latitude) NHCP’s Latest Ruling on the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass Controversy, Escalante 39
  • 40.
    Mazaua Coordinates The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS • A study presented in the 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference (Bulgaria, 2016) compared Pigafetta’s coordinates to the present coordinate system; Result was 9⁰56’ N latitude or only a 0⁰16’ difference against Pigafetta’s • Noted that even these coordinates were estimates, it was still closer to Limasawa than to Butuan which, using the modern coordinates, was located at 8°56’ N latitude. NHCP’s Latest Ruling on the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass Controversy, Escalante 40
  • 41.
    Final Verdict The Controversy:SITE OF THE FIRST MASS “…that Limasawa Island, Southern Leyte, be sustained as the site of the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass.” NHCP’s Latest Ruling on the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass Controversy, Escalante 41
  • 42.
  • 43.
  • 44.
    Resources: The Controversy: SITEOF THE FIRST MASS Alporha, V. C. (2018). Readings in Philippine History (First ed.). Manila: Rex Book Store. Bernad, M. A. (2002). Butuan or Limasawa: The Site of the First Mass in the Philippines: A Reexaminationof the Evidence. Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and Culture, 5, 133-166. Retrieved from https://journals.ateneo.edu/ojs/index.php/budhi/article/view/582/579 Escalante, R. R. (2020). NHCP’s Latest Ruling on the 1521 Easter Sunday Mass Controversy. National Historical Commission of the Philippines. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mExTClwb_z7AMjS3Hvpds75WLoKLNnYh/view History. (2018). Retrieved from New World Encyclopedia: https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/History 44