This document discusses Zionism and argues that it aims to establish a New World Order global government by destabilizing sovereign nations and religions. It claims that Zionism views the US and Israel as "Jewish" states and that Israel will provoke World War 3 in the Middle East to further this agenda. It attributes all major wars since 1776 to Zionist influence and international Zionist bankers profiting from conflicts. It argues that Zionism defends itself with charges of anti-Semitism while denying other nations sovereignty and perpetrating discrimination.
Four years after the invasion of Iraq. Hizb ut-Tahrir report released a report entitled "Iraq: A New Way Forward", which was widely circulated amongst thinkers, academics, journalists, columnists, politicians and think tanks.
The report comprehensively refutes the false justifications for the continued foreign intervention in Iraq - including the need for foreign forces to referee Iraq's sectarian conflict, the idea that more chaos would arise if troops left and the notion that Western governments have the moral authority for nation building. The report also argues that "any discussion of withdrawal from only Iraq will not serve to end the legacy of Western colonialism in the Middle East" because "for the long term stability of the region it is essential that foreign troops withdraw from the entire region, for their meddling has led to almost a century of tyrannical rule, brutal occupation and instability."
The report advocates the withdrawal of all foreign military personnel in Iraq and the wider region, an end to the West's support of dictatorial leaders in the region, allowing the Muslim world to decide its own political destiny without interference, freeing the region's vast energy reserves from the control of monarchies and multinationals, recognition of the illegality of the occupation of Palestine and an end to double standards over nuclear power in the region.
In this short yet timely essay, leading Libyan theologian, Aref Ali Nayed, discusses the legacy of fascism and totalitarianism in Libya. He calls for a national effort at healing, rehabilitation, rejuvenation, and renewal so that Libya can actualize all human possibilities, both individual and communal, and avoid a regress to fascism and totalitarianism.
Four years after the invasion of Iraq. Hizb ut-Tahrir report released a report entitled "Iraq: A New Way Forward", which was widely circulated amongst thinkers, academics, journalists, columnists, politicians and think tanks.
The report comprehensively refutes the false justifications for the continued foreign intervention in Iraq - including the need for foreign forces to referee Iraq's sectarian conflict, the idea that more chaos would arise if troops left and the notion that Western governments have the moral authority for nation building. The report also argues that "any discussion of withdrawal from only Iraq will not serve to end the legacy of Western colonialism in the Middle East" because "for the long term stability of the region it is essential that foreign troops withdraw from the entire region, for their meddling has led to almost a century of tyrannical rule, brutal occupation and instability."
The report advocates the withdrawal of all foreign military personnel in Iraq and the wider region, an end to the West's support of dictatorial leaders in the region, allowing the Muslim world to decide its own political destiny without interference, freeing the region's vast energy reserves from the control of monarchies and multinationals, recognition of the illegality of the occupation of Palestine and an end to double standards over nuclear power in the region.
In this short yet timely essay, leading Libyan theologian, Aref Ali Nayed, discusses the legacy of fascism and totalitarianism in Libya. He calls for a national effort at healing, rehabilitation, rejuvenation, and renewal so that Libya can actualize all human possibilities, both individual and communal, and avoid a regress to fascism and totalitarianism.
The Dialectics of Black Revolution, by Chairman Omali YeshitelaRBG Communiversity
"The Dialectics of Black Revolution: The Struggle to Defeat the Counterinsurgency in the U.S." by Omali Yeshitela, Chairman of the African People s Socialist Party,
National Humanities Center Resource Toolbox
The Making of African American Identity: Vol. III, 1917-1968
Stokely Carmichael.Toward Black Liberation The Massachusetts Review Autumn 1966 Excerpt*
Presentation prepared for lectures on Fascism for PS 240 Introduction to Political Theory at the University of Kentucky, Spring 2007. Dr. Christopher S. Rice, Instructor.
An Introduction to Terrorism, by Professor Joel hayward
By the end of this lecture students should be able to:
Recognise some major forms of terrorism
Understand some basic motivations behind them
Understand the nature and scope of the threat to us
The Dialectics of Black Revolution, by Chairman Omali YeshitelaRBG Communiversity
"The Dialectics of Black Revolution: The Struggle to Defeat the Counterinsurgency in the U.S." by Omali Yeshitela, Chairman of the African People s Socialist Party,
National Humanities Center Resource Toolbox
The Making of African American Identity: Vol. III, 1917-1968
Stokely Carmichael.Toward Black Liberation The Massachusetts Review Autumn 1966 Excerpt*
Presentation prepared for lectures on Fascism for PS 240 Introduction to Political Theory at the University of Kentucky, Spring 2007. Dr. Christopher S. Rice, Instructor.
An Introduction to Terrorism, by Professor Joel hayward
By the end of this lecture students should be able to:
Recognise some major forms of terrorism
Understand some basic motivations behind them
Understand the nature and scope of the threat to us
Uno de los mejores libros REVISIONISTAS a nivel mundial, su autor un resistente francés, un enemigo de los nazis y que por tanto luchó contra Alemania, da a conocer en esta obra lo que fueron los campos de concentración de Buchenwald y Dora.
Paul Rassinier ha sido el primero en manifestar, con brillante forma literaria, la verdad sobre el régimen de vida y los horrores de ambos campos. A su impresionante relato le sigue, como segunda parte del libro, una dura crítica de los principales testimonios sobre los campos alemanes.
The fact is, the Holocaust is about money, legitimacy for Israel, and the total denial of any
moral failings (or evilness) in the Jewish people. Jews are outraged when it is mentioned that
many gypsies and Russians suffered the same fate as Jews, because to compare a sub-human
to a Jew is unspeakable. The Jewish scripture declares that the life of a Jew is the most
priceless thing to "god" and the life of a non-Jew or "goy" is worthless. The Jews have a
history of crying "holocaust."
PROPAGANDA DE ATROCIDADES CONTRA ALEMANIA
LA ENFERMEDAD DE NUESTRO TIEMPO
La influencia devastadora de la propaganda hace difícil a los seres humanos, también a los bienintencionados, reconocer y juzgar los sucesos reales del acontecer contemporáneo.
"Léeme o laméntalo"
El título es algo alarmante. Aún, estimado lector, si tú escudriñas este pequeño libro, verás por ti mismo cuán merecido es. El libro nos cuenta cómo salvarnos a nosotros mismos y a otros de un sufrimiento inenarrable. Algunos libros son buenos y algunos otros pueden ser de provecho. Otros son mejores y deben ser leídos sin falta.
Hay, sin embargo, libros de tan excelente mérito por razón de sus consejos, la convicción que acarrean y la acción urgente a la que nos impulsa, que sería cabalmente alocado no leerlos.
"léeme o laméntalo" pertenece a esa clase de libros. Es por tu mayor interés, estimado amigo, que lo leas y releas, para ponderarlo bien y profundamente en sus contenidos. Nunca te arrepentirás de ello, por el contrario, grande y amargo será tu arrepentimiento si tu fallas en estudiarlo en sus sustanciosas páginas.
Circulo de Estudios Revisionistas con América “CERCA”
El judío como lo tenemos hoy entre nosotros es el producto de su doctrina
milenaria. Él es el resultado encarnado de su educación talmúdica. Él puede
comportarse todo lo "moderno" que se quiera pero siempre pensará u obrará
talmúdicamente, consciente o inconscientemente. Su único fin siempre será, poner
en práctica lo que Moisés le ha prescrito en el Talmud; desde hace 3 ó 4 mil años
hasta hoy, el judío espera a su Mesías para ponga en práctica lo que Moisés
predijo. El judío, por lo tanto, no es nada más que una herramienta que trabaja
mecánicamente para conseguir el cumplimiento de sus doctrinas y profecías.
Presentado como líder de la modernidad y de los tiempos futuros, Einstein no fue más que un pequeño bribón.
Este último caso es de Albert Einstein. Reconocido hoy por el sistema dominante de valores como el adalid de la paz y de la bondad humana, y reputado por casi todos como el más grande de los sabios conocidos que en el mundo han sido, su aúreo brillo no es más que una vulgar apariencia.
Presentado como líder de la modernidad y de los tiempos futuros, Einstein no fue más que un pequeño bribón.
Circulo de Estudios Revisionistas con América “CERCA”
Prólogo
Este libro es esencial en los actuales momentos críticos que vive México.
La crisis económica está agravada por una solapada crisis política.
Una vez más Salvador Borrego nos aporta datos geométricamente trazados, y
diáfanamente expuestos, sobre el desplazamiento de la doctrina política llamada
Revolución Mexicana, en favor de una nueva doctrina llamada Neoliberalismo.
Muchos mencionan este nombre, pero no han explicado en qué consiste ni cómo
adquirió fuerza de huracán. El lector encontrará aquí una explicación clara y
pragmática.
También encontrará aquí la más congruente crónica acerca de la Democracia y
de eso que han llamado "Globalización", hacia la cual nos conduce el Neoliberalismo.
"Globalización" es una palabra suave, hiperbólica, que no define la meta que se
le ha trazado al mundo. Borrego habla sobre el particular con la precisión que le ha
caracterizado en todos sus libros.
Javier Martinez M.
La Kábala es la doctrina secreta de los judíos trasmitida en la sucesión de los siglos por los
grandes instructores a sus predilectos discípulos bajo la solemne promesa de secreto.
Sin embargo, en el siglo XII, un erudito rabino, Moisés de León, transcribió los principales
textos de la Kábala en el libro titulado Zohar, que contiene inagotables tesoros de mística
sabiduría en espera de que los escudriñe el inteligente estudiante.
Pero como el Zohar está escrito en hebreo caldaico, que pocos eruditos conocen, tropiezan con
esta grave dificultad los deseos de estudiar la Kábala.
Las doctas asambleas de antiguos tiempos en que los insignes Maestros de Israel declaraban
sus doctrinas fueron las fuentes originarias de las enseñanzas de estos últimos días.
Del mismo punto de deriva el ocultismo moderno, y cuando las paginas de la Sagrada Kábala
se muestren al lector estudioso, quedara tan admirado como complacido de encontrar riquísima
verdad oculta,
Los libros de la Kábala son manantiales de aguas vivas, y en épocas de intensa necesidad
espiritual como la presente, es doblemente bien venida la consoladora fortaleza que nos ofrecen
sus enseñanzas.
La mayor parte de mi vida he consagrado a este estudio y las enseñanzas que en este libro
expongo se fundan en la antigua sabiduría de los rabino
¿Qué hay entre Satanás y los judíos?, ¿trabajan por un mismo fin?, ¿son cosas diferentes, distanciadas o son padre e hijos?...
A primera vista parece que Satanás está en el fondo de los infiernos padeciendo y los judíos trabajando en la tierra por enriquecerse, pareciera que aunque son malos los dos, cada quien trabaja en su lugar.
la raza humana fue creada varón y mujer. No existe un tercer género.
Además, la civilización nos ha mostrado que la familia humana natural (padre, madre e
hijos), con todos sus defectos, es el mejor ambiente posible para la educación de
generaciones futuras. ¿En verdad nos hemos equivocado durante tantos cientos de
años? ¿Vamos a dejar de lado toda la historia en favor de los últimos shows de
televisión sobre las maravillas de la flexibilidad de género?
Como dice el Dr. Socarides, prominente psicoanalista: “En ninguna parte dicen
los padres: ‘No me importa si mi hijo es homosexual o heterosexual.’ ”2 Si se les da a
elegir, la mayoría de los padres preferiría que sus hijos no se viesen implicados en la
conducta homosexual.
En ciertos círculos intelectuales está de moda creer que los seres humanos no
tenemos “ley natural” innata y que la esencia del ser humano es la libertad para
redefinirnos a nosotros mismos como queramos. Pero, ¿qué bien puede traernos la
libertad si es utilizada como desafío de quienes somos?
Algunas cosas, argumentaríamos nosotros, no son redefinibles. Si de hecho la
normalidad es “que esta actúe según su diseño” –y creemos que es verdad- entonces
la naturaleza nos apela a realizar nuestros destinos como varón y mujer.
GUÍA PARA PADRES PARA LA PREVENCIÓN DE LA HOMOSEXUALIDAD.
The Zionist Agenda Part I
1. The Zionist Agenda Part I
Exclusive to Rense.com
Commentary By Ted Lang
1-14-7
Zionism can now be defined as the political movement which wraps
and camouflages itself in the Jewish faith, having as its primary
mission the destruction of all sovereign national governments, religions
and social structures with the objective of removing these obstacles to
the establishment of a one world global government: the "New World
Order."
Zionism is also the belief in the "Jewish" state, the primary one being
the United States, and of secondary significance, the state of Israel.
The latter will serve as the "trigger" to provoke World War III by
inciting belligerent political and religious interests in the Middle East
to war against each other. Thus, by taking advantage of the competing
hostile religious and political divides in the region, the military chaos
that could be launched and the horrific world war that would follow,
leaves but only one way out for the human race. Mankind will then
come to realize that its salvation can come only through a beneficent
New World Order government. Predecessors of the NWO are, of
course, The League of Nations and the UN.
The Zionist agenda can be attributed as the chief contributing causal
factors behind virtually every war on the planet since 1776, especially
those involving US. And although it was a revelation, when only a
short time ago I first came to realize the Zionist fingerprints all over
our very own American Revolution and nation's first war, I am now
aware of Zionism's continued and intensified involvement in our
second war, the War of 1812. In fact, all our wars after 1776 were not
only engineered by Zionists, but can also be shown to be
interconnected to each other via the cult of powerful international
Zionist bankers. The Zionist bankers, headed by the international
House of Rothschild-Rockefeller, have deliberately incited global
conflicts and then made astonishing profits funding both sides of the
conflicts they created.
Zionism can be shown to be a product of Jewish origin, and these
2. origins have been "thoroughly studied" by Professor Kevin
MacDonald, a psychologist at Cal-State. He briefly articulates the
origins of Zionism using the presently accepted and politically correct
euphemism of "neoconservatism." As MacDonald has offered in his
September 18, 2003 essay, written for V-Dare.com entitled, "Thinking
About Neoconservatism," he states, "there is nothing conservative
about their goals." I would hasten to add that there is nothing new
about their agenda either; nor is their agenda in any way shape or form
"American." It is called neoconservatism, but it is really one thing
only:
Zionism! And there is authoritative source material that offers viable
arguments that Zionist Jews aren't really Jews at all, but an Asiatic race
originating from a land formerly identified as Khazar in the country
known today as Georgia. The population was "converted" to Judaism
merely because their king had converted in 720 A.D.
Zionism, through its founder, Theodor Herzl, charges Jews with his
vision as offered in his book "The Jewish State" (1896): "We are one
people!" What is meant by this is that although Jewish people may
have divergent interests, backgrounds and goals, Zionism charges all
Jews to put their differences behind themrecognizing that they are
different from all other people. This serves to create the double-edge
sword that is Zionism; 1) all Jews are both Zionists and Jews; and 2)
Jews are a race, thereby justifying the charge of "racism" to be used
against anyone and everyone who questions Zionism. It justifies the
use of the racist term "anti-Semite."
But Zionism is not a religion; it is a political agenda. Political agendas
are normally the product of a state, or at least are intended to result in
state action. The latter characteristic approach launching political
agendas via state mandate is usually the product of a secret, or
powerful and possibly even a dangerous cabal that represents only the
interests of their own group. This is usually in conflict with the best
interests of either the national population, or possibly Mankind in
general.
Zionism defends itself against its critics with racist-based charges of
anti-Semitism purely because Zionists reserve for themselves the right
to hide behind their adopted sovereignty of being a "nation" of people
and the nation of "Israel." They offer that all Jews are a nation, but
when convenient or deemed necessary, they invoke their "religion" to
stave off criticism and analytical inquiry.
3. Are Jews BOTH a race and a religion? Is there such a thing as the
"Protestant Race," or the "Catholic Race"? Can there be, therefore,
such a thing as the "Jewish Race"? Depending upon the circumstances
or the nature of inquiry or criticism, Zionists will either cry "religious
persecution" or "racial discrimination" as a defense. These charges are
consistently offered after they, Zionists, first perpetrate the persecution
of others, and when it is they who first initiate racial discrimination
towards others, most notably in the form of mass murder and acts of
terrorism against the Palestinians and other Middle Eastern nations.
They then cry anti-Semitism when questioned, defending their
indefensible actions clearly recognized as such by the world. They
insist that their "nation" has a right to exist, as they deny other nations
that very same right.
Examining further MacDonald's V-Dare piece, he provides a hyperlink
promoting his book, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary
Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and
Political Movements. MacDonald promotes what I feel is the standard
refutation of the connectivity of a Zionist conspiracy, when he offers as
its basic defense the disparity of Jewish cultural and intellectual
diversity and the resultant conflicting points of view. To be fair, I have
not read either the book or any additional evaluation of the contents
therein; but I focus on this vignette to make the point of the common
error that is always resurrected to defeat the "conspiracy theory."
MacDonald writes: "There is no implication here of a unified Jewish
'conspiracy' to undermine gentile culture, as portrayed in the notorious
Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Since the Enlightenment, Judaism has
never been a unified, monolithic movement, and there has clearly been
a great deal of disagreement among Jews as to how to protect
themselves and attain their interests during this period. The movements
discussed in this volume (Boasian anthropology, political radicalism,
psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt School of Social Research, and the New
York Intellectuals) were advanced by relatively few individuals whose
views may not have been known or understood by the majority of the
Jewish community. The argument is that Jews dominated these
intellectual movements, that a strong sense of Jewish identity was
characteristic of the great majority of these individuals, and that these
individuals were pursuing a Jewish agenda in establishing and
participating in these movements."
MacDonald does not examine, at least as far as I am aware due to my
ignorance of his total efforts, the connection between Mayer
Rothschild, the patriarch of the Rothschild dynasty, and Adam
Weisshaupt, the founder of a satanic cult calling themselves the
4. "Illuminati." It is believed that Rothschild encouraged or plotted with
Weisshaupt for the Illuminati's infiltration of the Freemasons. Rank
and file Freemasons are unaware of the satanic aspect of their
organization, yet the connection between the rich and powerful
Rothschilds, Weisshaupt, the Freemasons and Zionism is foolish to
ignore. And although the connection has been brought to the fore by
such as Dr. Henry Makow, the term "Illuminati" is simply too mystical
and to colorful to believe, especially when denigrated by the towering
intellects "who don't believe in conspiracy theories." The term
"International Zionist bankers" offers a more believable base providing
easier investigation and analysis.
Any connections to these theories, even those supported by factual,
hard evidence, are then pounced upon by the Zionist network of liars,
frauds, dirt and smear mongers, journalistic charlatans and other
propagandists, and are decried as examples of "frauds" and "forgeries."
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are, but of course, a "forgery."
Never mind that they are on exhibit in the British Museum the curators
are obviously too stupid and have been duped. And "Hitler's bankers"
are another fraud. And Israel's attack on the U.S.S. Liberty never
happened, and 34 of our Navy personnel weren't really killed in that act
of war. Everybody else is lying, but never the Zionists. They never lie
or persecute or discriminate against anyone. That is why they need
"hate crimes" protection!
MacDonald seems to have fallen into the same Zionist trap that befalls
most critics of "Judaism." Let's think about that for a moment. Let's
reflect for a moment on Hitler's views of the "Jewish bankers" who
betrayed Germany via the Versailles Treaty. Let's reflect upon Mel
Gibson's outburst while in an inebriated state blaming all the world's
wars on "Jews." How about Henry Ford in his Zionist "451"-banned
book, The International Jew? It can be shown that "Jews" were clearly
identified as being heavily involved in both initiating World War I and
in cutting up all the pieces of the Versailles victory pie for themselves.
To be sure, "Jews" presided over both the beginnings of World War I,
as well as in its spoils, one of them being the guarantee of a "Jewish
state" in the captured Ottoman territory identified as Palestine. But
were these "Jews" really Jews, or were they in fact Zionists? Failing to
separate the two designations is what discredits Hitler, Ford, Gibson,
Lindbergh, Mearsheimer, Walt, Judt, Freedman, and now probably
even former President Jimmy Carter.
I fear that the genre of "conspiracy theory" dismissal rhetoric offered
by such as Professor MacDonald, misses badly on the real driver that
should be at the heart of any discussion involving the international