Living in a world of constant change, we tend to celebrate those who are fast to provide the results. But rushing for a quick fix we tend to forget that problem framing defines the array of possible solutions. When problem is determined too broadly solving it resembles looking for a needle in a haystack. On the contrary, too narrow definition leave the best solution outside of the frame. Meanwhile, a properly defined problem is already partially solved.
I don’t know what would be your solution, but most of the people
Have anyone thought about that? Turns out, that wouldn’t work
Danker repeated the same test with a new group, EXCEPT this time…
In other words, a properly determined problem is already partially solved.
We already heard about Problems from Kyle today. Now I want to go deeper into that subject and talk about how to frame them.
When a problem is determined too …
…too narrow definition leaves the best answers…
This means that this is the problem all across the world.
For example, most of us never thought of using an iron for cooking.
One of the most common biases that we all suffer from
hard to eliminate, but being aware of it, and constantly ask for feedback would help to reduce it’s impact
In environments where even the smallest change…
Apparently, anything that presented along with a problem often perceived as necessary condition for successful solution.
So what did the team the winner team do?