The MAAL and proposed diverted profits tax both target multinational groups over $1b in income. The MAAL applies to schemes reducing Australian tax, while the diverted profits tax applies if a transaction reduces Australian tax and increases related-party foreign tax by less than 80%. The diverted profits tax rate is 40% and applies regardless of arrangement date, while the MAAL rate is 30% and considers activities/substance. Both regimes calculate attributed income similarly but the diverted profits tax sits unclear in legislation, potentially facing double tax treaty issues.
This document provides an overview of tax havens, including definitions, criteria, characteristics, types, examples, effects, and approaches taken by governments and organizations like the OECD. It discusses what constitutes a tax haven according to the OECD and other sources. It outlines the major tax haven locations around the world and different types of tax havens. It also summarizes the responses by governments and regulatory bodies to promote transparency and exchange of information between jurisdictions.
Multinationals are challenged by changing tax laws, accounting practices, valuation methods and penalties as administrations around the world clamp down on tax avoidance
The document summarizes the key changes to the Texas franchise tax, including moving from a tax on capital and earned surplus to a gross margin tax. It explains what entities are taxable and outlines the calculations and rates for the new gross margin tax, including allowances for cost of goods sold, compensation, and different tax rates for retail/wholesale entities. Discounts are available for smaller businesses. Methods for filing extensions and returns are also covered.
The document defines tax evasion as illegally avoiding paying true tax liability through intentional omissions or falsifications. Those caught face criminal charges and penalties. Tax avoidance refers to legally reducing taxes owed by taking advantage of deductions, credits, and loopholes within tax laws. While tax avoidance is legal, tax evasion is never legal and carries criminal consequences if caught. The document provides examples of common tax evasion and avoidance practices and clarifies the key difference that tax avoidance operates within legal tax frameworks, whereas tax evasion does not.
The UAE will introduce a federal corporate tax on business profits starting June 1, 2023. The tax will be 0% for taxable income up to AED 375,000 and 9% for income above that threshold. Large multinationals may face different rates. The tax applies to corporate profits but not personal income or salaries. Free zone incentives will continue for compliant businesses not operating in the mainland. The new law aims to increase government revenues while continuing to support small businesses and foreign investment.
Tax is a crucial revenue stream for administrations across the world.
While many agencies have already established processes for compliance and enforcement, a combination of avoidance and error is still costing governments billions.
Detection and Prevention measures provide the key to tackling these challenges
An individual, company, trust or superannuation fund can use this guide to work out their CGT obligations.
Individuals may prefer to use the shorter, simpler Personal investors guide to capital gains tax 2016 (NAT 4152) if, during 2015–16, they only:
sold some shares
sold some units in a managed fund, or
received a distribution of a capital gain from a managed fund.
A company, trust or superannuation fund may be required to complete and lodge a Capital gains tax (CGT) schedule 2016 (NAT 3423) (CGT schedule) as explained in Part C.
If you have a small business, you should get the publication Capital gains tax concessions for small business 2016.
This guide does not deal fully with the CGT position of:
an individual or entity that is not an Australian resident for tax purposes
a company that is the head company of a consolidated group. The rules that apply to members of a consolidated group modify the application of the CGT rules. For more information about the consolidation rules, see Consolidation.
This guide does not cover individuals or entities whose gains or losses are not subject to CGT but are covered under other tax law; for example, gains or losses from:
carrying on a business of share trading; see Carrying on a business of share trading
property renovation activities.
This document provides an overview of tax havens, including definitions, criteria, characteristics, types, examples, effects, and approaches taken by governments and organizations like the OECD. It discusses what constitutes a tax haven according to the OECD and other sources. It outlines the major tax haven locations around the world and different types of tax havens. It also summarizes the responses by governments and regulatory bodies to promote transparency and exchange of information between jurisdictions.
Multinationals are challenged by changing tax laws, accounting practices, valuation methods and penalties as administrations around the world clamp down on tax avoidance
The document summarizes the key changes to the Texas franchise tax, including moving from a tax on capital and earned surplus to a gross margin tax. It explains what entities are taxable and outlines the calculations and rates for the new gross margin tax, including allowances for cost of goods sold, compensation, and different tax rates for retail/wholesale entities. Discounts are available for smaller businesses. Methods for filing extensions and returns are also covered.
The document defines tax evasion as illegally avoiding paying true tax liability through intentional omissions or falsifications. Those caught face criminal charges and penalties. Tax avoidance refers to legally reducing taxes owed by taking advantage of deductions, credits, and loopholes within tax laws. While tax avoidance is legal, tax evasion is never legal and carries criminal consequences if caught. The document provides examples of common tax evasion and avoidance practices and clarifies the key difference that tax avoidance operates within legal tax frameworks, whereas tax evasion does not.
The UAE will introduce a federal corporate tax on business profits starting June 1, 2023. The tax will be 0% for taxable income up to AED 375,000 and 9% for income above that threshold. Large multinationals may face different rates. The tax applies to corporate profits but not personal income or salaries. Free zone incentives will continue for compliant businesses not operating in the mainland. The new law aims to increase government revenues while continuing to support small businesses and foreign investment.
Tax is a crucial revenue stream for administrations across the world.
While many agencies have already established processes for compliance and enforcement, a combination of avoidance and error is still costing governments billions.
Detection and Prevention measures provide the key to tackling these challenges
An individual, company, trust or superannuation fund can use this guide to work out their CGT obligations.
Individuals may prefer to use the shorter, simpler Personal investors guide to capital gains tax 2016 (NAT 4152) if, during 2015–16, they only:
sold some shares
sold some units in a managed fund, or
received a distribution of a capital gain from a managed fund.
A company, trust or superannuation fund may be required to complete and lodge a Capital gains tax (CGT) schedule 2016 (NAT 3423) (CGT schedule) as explained in Part C.
If you have a small business, you should get the publication Capital gains tax concessions for small business 2016.
This guide does not deal fully with the CGT position of:
an individual or entity that is not an Australian resident for tax purposes
a company that is the head company of a consolidated group. The rules that apply to members of a consolidated group modify the application of the CGT rules. For more information about the consolidation rules, see Consolidation.
This guide does not cover individuals or entities whose gains or losses are not subject to CGT but are covered under other tax law; for example, gains or losses from:
carrying on a business of share trading; see Carrying on a business of share trading
property renovation activities.
This document summarizes the income tax implications for unit holders of mutual funds in India. It outlines the tax rates on dividend income and capital gains for equity oriented schemes, debt oriented schemes, and other schemes. The tax rates vary depending on whether the unit holder is an individual, Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), domestic company, or non-resident Indian (NRI). Capital gains tax rates on long term and short term gains are also provided.
Tax Evasion and Methods of Avoiding TaxAnkit Kumar
This document discusses tax evasion and avoidance. It provides data on various individuals' PTP scores and ways that people evade taxes such as smuggling, submitting false returns, and claiming personal expenses as business expenses. It also lists penalties for tax evasion ranging from 100-300% of unpaid taxes to Rs. 5000 for not filing returns. The document identifies limitations of the Indian tax structure that contribute to evasion, such as high taxation rates, corruption, and frequent changes in government. It defines tax avoidance as the legal exploitation of tax regulations to minimize taxes owed.
This document discusses different methods taxpayers can use to reduce their tax liability: tax evasion, tax avoidance, and tax planning. Tax evasion involves illegally hiding income or falsifying records. Tax avoidance aims to reduce taxes through legal but questionable loopholes. In contrast, tax planning makes legitimate use of exemptions, deductions, and other provisions in the tax code to lower tax burden. Proper tax planning is an encouraged way for taxpayers to minimize their liability within the law.
ethical issues in tax evasion. In business, theres always a situation where one has to choose one of the 2 things:
1) ethics 2) profits
one has to decide whether profits are more important than ethics
Tax fraud occurs when an individual or entity underreports income or overstates deductions on a tax return to reduce the amount of taxes owed. In India, major areas of tax fraud include falsification of invoices, unreported income, and bribery of tax officials. The Indian government estimates an annual loss of 14 trillion rupees from tax evasion. Recent government efforts to curb fraud include new laws targeting undisclosed foreign assets, a proposed nationwide goods and services tax, and increased use of technology in tax administration. However, tax fraud remains a significant problem in India due to complex tax laws, weak enforcement, and corruption. Simplification of the tax system and improved monitoring are needed to further reduce the prevalence of tax evasion.
- The document discusses how African governments have failed to collect sufficient tax revenue from mining companies during recent commodity price booms, despite large profits for mining companies. This is due to excessive tax subsidies/concessions and aggressive tax avoidance strategies by mining companies.
- It recommends that African governments revise mining tax regimes to collect fairer royalties and taxes, and increase transparency by requiring financial reporting of payments by country. International standards should also require multinational mining companies to publish financial reports by country.
- Increased transparency, elimination of secret tax exemptions in contracts, and capacity building for tax authorities are needed to ensure governments and citizens can monitor mining revenue and its use.
Taxation of dividends – Get informed about whether you have to pay taxes or n...UWU Solutions, Lda.
Over the past years “Profit and Gains Ltd.” has been having a great performance. This company based in Portugal since 2009 has been expanding its business into international markets, taking advantage from the growth of some emerging markets through means of local partnerships. The international dimension is part of its DNA, since its four founding partners are of different nationalities. João is Portuguese, Carlos is Angolan, Alfonso is from Spain and Walter from Belgium. Each one of them hold 25% of the company’s capital.
For the first time, and due to the company’s good results, the four members are considering to start distributing dividends. However, their doubts about how much taxes they will pay are preventing them to go ahead with the decision. In addition to their different nationalities, João and Walter’s share of the “Profit and Gains Ltd.” capital is done through other companies they have created, so that they could invest in other companies.
In order to help these four investors and to clarify all their doubts about taxation of dividends, we will begin by analysing the overall framework of this issue, so that we can then apply the rules to the actual case.
- Learn more at http://bit.ly/1w3QYF8
This seminar discusses tax havens and their problems and potential solutions. It begins by defining tax havens as countries that offer little to no tax liability and financial transparency to attract foreign businesses and individuals. It then lists several well-known tax havens and notes that some have signed agreements to provide more financial information to foreign governments. The presentation outlines the factors used to rank jurisdictions on the Financial Secrecy Index, and provides the top 10 rankings. It then discusses problems caused by tax havens, such as depriving governments of revenue, enabling criminal activity, and increasing inequality. Potential solutions proposed include country-by-country reporting of multinational taxes, unitary taxation, automatic information exchange, public registers of company owners, and
This document discusses tax evasion from the perspective of a forensic expert. It begins by defining tax evasion and tax avoidance, noting that the latter involves legally minimizing taxes while the former involves illegal means. Next, it compares tax evasion and avoidance and examines reasons for the tax gap in the UK. It then looks at global tax evasion by profession and discusses long-term remedies like tax planning and management. The document outlines ways that tax evasion occurs and who is responsible in India. It also examines some attempts at tax evasion during India's demonetization and concludes by emphasizing the importance of tax planning to curb evasion.
This document discusses zero tax companies. It defines a zero tax company as a business that shows profits but pays no taxes. In India in the 1990s, conflicting business laws allowed many companies to report book profits but pay no income tax. The document also discusses how large corporations like Verizon avoid paying taxes by using offshore subsidiaries in low tax countries, harvesting tax losses, and taking advantage of accounting rules like accelerated depreciation. India introduced a minimum alternate tax to ensure profitable companies pay a minimum amount of corporate tax.
Tax fraud involves deliberately underpaying taxes owed through dishonest means such as underreporting income, overstating deductions, or providing false information. Common methods of tax fraud include suppressing personal expenses, deliberately omitting income from business transactions, making false entries in books to hide unreported income or inflate expenses, and concealing receipt of income by not recording transactions. Large corporations may also commit tax fraud through practices like improper transfer pricing or window dressing financial reports. Individual tax fraud usually stems from rationalizations of high taxes and opportunities created by complex tax systems.
India loses over $314 billion annually to tax evasion, including $314 billion from uncollected income taxes and $800 billion from corporate tax incentives. Tax evasion occurs through weak enforcement systems, corruption, complex laws, and methods like overstating expenses and underreporting income. While some large companies and trusts have been caught evading taxes, overall tax evasion remains a major problem as only about 36 million of India's 1.3 billion people pay income taxes. Efforts to curb evasion through new laws and whistleblower rewards have had limited success.
The FASB met Wednesday, Jan. 10, 2018, and discussed how companies should account for the effects of the new tax law, introduced as H.R. 1 (Tax Cuts and Jobs Act). The discussion addressed six different financial reporting issues related to the new tax law and has already resulted in the issuance of a FASB Staff Q&A.
Year-End Tax and Financial Planning by myStockOptions.comBruce Brumberg
This presentation provides a timely overview of year-end financial-planning and tax topics for stock compensation, including points of importance for employee education and for financial advisors. Special attention is given to issues involving tax-rate increases. While each annual edition features planning concerns specific to that year-end, the general ideas presented here are perennially useful.
There are two videos in PPT, where are black slides:
Video1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxW8GP59Sq8
Video 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcZF_DxQ5cU
Tax avoidance is legal minimization of taxes through approved means like RRSP contributions or incorporating a business. Tax evasion is illegal non-reporting of income. People engage in both up to the point where marginal benefits equal marginal costs, taking advantage of techniques like postponing taxes, arbitraging across income streams and individuals. While avoidance diverts resources, evasion undermines the tax system and fairness. Higher taxes and penalties reduce evasion, while audits are also deterrent but costly.
The document provides an overview of helpful tax tips and savings opportunities for the 2016 tax season, presented by Monica Silwanowicz. It discusses limitations on itemized deductions, personal exemptions, and the alternative minimum tax. It also covers opportunities like donating appreciated assets to charity, qualified charitable distributions from IRAs, and potential impacts of tax reform proposals on businesses, individuals, itemized deductions, and estate taxes. The document aims to help taxpayers maximize deductions and plan effectively for the upcoming tax year.
Direct Oil and Gas Investing offers powerful tax deductions to investors. Up to 80% of the investment can be deducted in the year the investment is made as long as you use the proper investment strategy
Tax planning involves legally arranging one's financial affairs to minimize tax liability, while complying with all applicable tax laws. Tax avoidance uses artificial or dubious methods to reduce taxes in a manner that defeats the intent of tax statutes. Tax evasion illegally avoids taxes through actions like knowingly making untrue statements or omitting required information. The line between tax planning and avoidance is thin, with avoidance including an element of mala fide intent or use of "colorable devices" to circumvent the spirit of tax laws.
This document provides a summary of transfer pricing regulations and guidelines for several countries in the Asia Pacific region, including Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan. For each country, it outlines the key transfer pricing legislation, documentation requirements, audit practices, advance pricing arrangements, dispute resolution procedures, and other issues like service charges, loans, and penalties.
This document summarizes the following:
1) It introduces the monthly publication "International Tax News" which provides updates and analysis on international tax developments authored by PwC specialists.
2) It highlights several key international tax law changes and proposals in countries such as Cyprus, Brazil, Switzerland, the UK, Canada, Hong Kong, Italy and more.
3) It specifically outlines proposed changes in Cyprus regarding the introduction of a notional interest deduction on new corporate equity and proposals for tax neutral treatment of foreign exchange differences.
This document summarizes the income tax implications for unit holders of mutual funds in India. It outlines the tax rates on dividend income and capital gains for equity oriented schemes, debt oriented schemes, and other schemes. The tax rates vary depending on whether the unit holder is an individual, Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), domestic company, or non-resident Indian (NRI). Capital gains tax rates on long term and short term gains are also provided.
Tax Evasion and Methods of Avoiding TaxAnkit Kumar
This document discusses tax evasion and avoidance. It provides data on various individuals' PTP scores and ways that people evade taxes such as smuggling, submitting false returns, and claiming personal expenses as business expenses. It also lists penalties for tax evasion ranging from 100-300% of unpaid taxes to Rs. 5000 for not filing returns. The document identifies limitations of the Indian tax structure that contribute to evasion, such as high taxation rates, corruption, and frequent changes in government. It defines tax avoidance as the legal exploitation of tax regulations to minimize taxes owed.
This document discusses different methods taxpayers can use to reduce their tax liability: tax evasion, tax avoidance, and tax planning. Tax evasion involves illegally hiding income or falsifying records. Tax avoidance aims to reduce taxes through legal but questionable loopholes. In contrast, tax planning makes legitimate use of exemptions, deductions, and other provisions in the tax code to lower tax burden. Proper tax planning is an encouraged way for taxpayers to minimize their liability within the law.
ethical issues in tax evasion. In business, theres always a situation where one has to choose one of the 2 things:
1) ethics 2) profits
one has to decide whether profits are more important than ethics
Tax fraud occurs when an individual or entity underreports income or overstates deductions on a tax return to reduce the amount of taxes owed. In India, major areas of tax fraud include falsification of invoices, unreported income, and bribery of tax officials. The Indian government estimates an annual loss of 14 trillion rupees from tax evasion. Recent government efforts to curb fraud include new laws targeting undisclosed foreign assets, a proposed nationwide goods and services tax, and increased use of technology in tax administration. However, tax fraud remains a significant problem in India due to complex tax laws, weak enforcement, and corruption. Simplification of the tax system and improved monitoring are needed to further reduce the prevalence of tax evasion.
- The document discusses how African governments have failed to collect sufficient tax revenue from mining companies during recent commodity price booms, despite large profits for mining companies. This is due to excessive tax subsidies/concessions and aggressive tax avoidance strategies by mining companies.
- It recommends that African governments revise mining tax regimes to collect fairer royalties and taxes, and increase transparency by requiring financial reporting of payments by country. International standards should also require multinational mining companies to publish financial reports by country.
- Increased transparency, elimination of secret tax exemptions in contracts, and capacity building for tax authorities are needed to ensure governments and citizens can monitor mining revenue and its use.
Taxation of dividends – Get informed about whether you have to pay taxes or n...UWU Solutions, Lda.
Over the past years “Profit and Gains Ltd.” has been having a great performance. This company based in Portugal since 2009 has been expanding its business into international markets, taking advantage from the growth of some emerging markets through means of local partnerships. The international dimension is part of its DNA, since its four founding partners are of different nationalities. João is Portuguese, Carlos is Angolan, Alfonso is from Spain and Walter from Belgium. Each one of them hold 25% of the company’s capital.
For the first time, and due to the company’s good results, the four members are considering to start distributing dividends. However, their doubts about how much taxes they will pay are preventing them to go ahead with the decision. In addition to their different nationalities, João and Walter’s share of the “Profit and Gains Ltd.” capital is done through other companies they have created, so that they could invest in other companies.
In order to help these four investors and to clarify all their doubts about taxation of dividends, we will begin by analysing the overall framework of this issue, so that we can then apply the rules to the actual case.
- Learn more at http://bit.ly/1w3QYF8
This seminar discusses tax havens and their problems and potential solutions. It begins by defining tax havens as countries that offer little to no tax liability and financial transparency to attract foreign businesses and individuals. It then lists several well-known tax havens and notes that some have signed agreements to provide more financial information to foreign governments. The presentation outlines the factors used to rank jurisdictions on the Financial Secrecy Index, and provides the top 10 rankings. It then discusses problems caused by tax havens, such as depriving governments of revenue, enabling criminal activity, and increasing inequality. Potential solutions proposed include country-by-country reporting of multinational taxes, unitary taxation, automatic information exchange, public registers of company owners, and
This document discusses tax evasion from the perspective of a forensic expert. It begins by defining tax evasion and tax avoidance, noting that the latter involves legally minimizing taxes while the former involves illegal means. Next, it compares tax evasion and avoidance and examines reasons for the tax gap in the UK. It then looks at global tax evasion by profession and discusses long-term remedies like tax planning and management. The document outlines ways that tax evasion occurs and who is responsible in India. It also examines some attempts at tax evasion during India's demonetization and concludes by emphasizing the importance of tax planning to curb evasion.
This document discusses zero tax companies. It defines a zero tax company as a business that shows profits but pays no taxes. In India in the 1990s, conflicting business laws allowed many companies to report book profits but pay no income tax. The document also discusses how large corporations like Verizon avoid paying taxes by using offshore subsidiaries in low tax countries, harvesting tax losses, and taking advantage of accounting rules like accelerated depreciation. India introduced a minimum alternate tax to ensure profitable companies pay a minimum amount of corporate tax.
Tax fraud involves deliberately underpaying taxes owed through dishonest means such as underreporting income, overstating deductions, or providing false information. Common methods of tax fraud include suppressing personal expenses, deliberately omitting income from business transactions, making false entries in books to hide unreported income or inflate expenses, and concealing receipt of income by not recording transactions. Large corporations may also commit tax fraud through practices like improper transfer pricing or window dressing financial reports. Individual tax fraud usually stems from rationalizations of high taxes and opportunities created by complex tax systems.
India loses over $314 billion annually to tax evasion, including $314 billion from uncollected income taxes and $800 billion from corporate tax incentives. Tax evasion occurs through weak enforcement systems, corruption, complex laws, and methods like overstating expenses and underreporting income. While some large companies and trusts have been caught evading taxes, overall tax evasion remains a major problem as only about 36 million of India's 1.3 billion people pay income taxes. Efforts to curb evasion through new laws and whistleblower rewards have had limited success.
The FASB met Wednesday, Jan. 10, 2018, and discussed how companies should account for the effects of the new tax law, introduced as H.R. 1 (Tax Cuts and Jobs Act). The discussion addressed six different financial reporting issues related to the new tax law and has already resulted in the issuance of a FASB Staff Q&A.
Year-End Tax and Financial Planning by myStockOptions.comBruce Brumberg
This presentation provides a timely overview of year-end financial-planning and tax topics for stock compensation, including points of importance for employee education and for financial advisors. Special attention is given to issues involving tax-rate increases. While each annual edition features planning concerns specific to that year-end, the general ideas presented here are perennially useful.
There are two videos in PPT, where are black slides:
Video1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxW8GP59Sq8
Video 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcZF_DxQ5cU
Tax avoidance is legal minimization of taxes through approved means like RRSP contributions or incorporating a business. Tax evasion is illegal non-reporting of income. People engage in both up to the point where marginal benefits equal marginal costs, taking advantage of techniques like postponing taxes, arbitraging across income streams and individuals. While avoidance diverts resources, evasion undermines the tax system and fairness. Higher taxes and penalties reduce evasion, while audits are also deterrent but costly.
The document provides an overview of helpful tax tips and savings opportunities for the 2016 tax season, presented by Monica Silwanowicz. It discusses limitations on itemized deductions, personal exemptions, and the alternative minimum tax. It also covers opportunities like donating appreciated assets to charity, qualified charitable distributions from IRAs, and potential impacts of tax reform proposals on businesses, individuals, itemized deductions, and estate taxes. The document aims to help taxpayers maximize deductions and plan effectively for the upcoming tax year.
Direct Oil and Gas Investing offers powerful tax deductions to investors. Up to 80% of the investment can be deducted in the year the investment is made as long as you use the proper investment strategy
Tax planning involves legally arranging one's financial affairs to minimize tax liability, while complying with all applicable tax laws. Tax avoidance uses artificial or dubious methods to reduce taxes in a manner that defeats the intent of tax statutes. Tax evasion illegally avoids taxes through actions like knowingly making untrue statements or omitting required information. The line between tax planning and avoidance is thin, with avoidance including an element of mala fide intent or use of "colorable devices" to circumvent the spirit of tax laws.
This document provides a summary of transfer pricing regulations and guidelines for several countries in the Asia Pacific region, including Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan. For each country, it outlines the key transfer pricing legislation, documentation requirements, audit practices, advance pricing arrangements, dispute resolution procedures, and other issues like service charges, loans, and penalties.
This document summarizes the following:
1) It introduces the monthly publication "International Tax News" which provides updates and analysis on international tax developments authored by PwC specialists.
2) It highlights several key international tax law changes and proposals in countries such as Cyprus, Brazil, Switzerland, the UK, Canada, Hong Kong, Italy and more.
3) It specifically outlines proposed changes in Cyprus regarding the introduction of a notional interest deduction on new corporate equity and proposals for tax neutral treatment of foreign exchange differences.
The document summarizes tax issues in Vietnam discussed by the We Taxation and Transfer Pricing Sector Committee. It addresses five key areas: 1) VAT-related issues regarding VAT rates for export services and non-VAT clawbacks for failed oil and gas projects. 2) Restricted deductibility of advertising and promotional expenses. 3) Issues with tax treaty claims and treatment of capital transfers in real estate companies. 4) Foreign contractor withholding tax treatment related to warranties and distribution rights. 5) Simplifying documentation for foreign tax credits. Recommendations are provided for each area to improve tax regulations and create a more competitive investment environment.
This document discusses international taxation for multinational corporations. It covers key topics like how taxes affect investment decisions, different tax rates and types of taxes across countries, and strategies to minimize double taxation. The objective for multinational companies is to minimize worldwide taxes by taking advantage of differences in tax laws and rates between countries where they operate.
This document summarizes the issue of high-net-worth taxpayers becoming subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) even when they do not have traditional preference items. It develops an analytical framework to predict the probability a taxpayer will be subject to the AMT based solely on the percentage of total income from long-term capital gains and the state tax rate. The key factors are that state taxes are deductible for regular tax but not AMT, and the declining difference between regular and AMT rates exacerbates this issue. The framework is then applied to examples comparing regular tax liability to AMT liability at different income levels and capital gains percentages.
The way to Tax Multinational Corporations?Howie Thomas
John Woodward is an Australian Accountant who has invented a simplified way of Taxing Multinational Corporations globally. It's simplicity is such that you stop and think why has nobody done this before?
Diverted Profits Tax (a) Google Tax: United Kingdom’s combat against tax evasionThangadurai Punithan
The government of the UK (United Kingdom) has enacted a measure – Diverted Profits Tax (‘DPT’) – in its Finance Act, 2015, to penalize the corporations who have diverted their profits elsewhere to dodge their tax payouts in UK.
Tax Amnesty-A Step on the ladder out of Recession by Gabriel FatokunboFatokunbo Gabriel
1) The document discusses implementing a Tax Amnesty Program (TAP) in Nigeria to help address the country's economic recession by generating additional tax revenue.
2) TAP would allow tax defaulters to pay defined amounts to settle past tax liabilities in exchange for forgiveness from prosecution or penalties.
3) The document reviews how TAP has worked in other countries like Ireland and the US, generating substantial tax revenue, and the potential benefits it could provide for Nigeria's economy if implemented properly.
VIETNAM TAXATION – OUTLOOK ON THE EUROPEAN UNION VIETNAM FREE TRADE AGREEMENT...Dr. Oliver Massmann
The document discusses several issues with Vietnam's taxation system and opportunities presented by the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EVFTA). It identifies inconsistencies between central government policies and local tax department practices, contradictory regulations, and complexity in VAT calculation and refund rules that create difficulties for businesses. Implementation of clearer rules and guidelines is needed to resolve tax payment issues, properly apply incentives, and avoid penalties from changing interpretations. The EVFTA is expected to boost investment and trade but also influence Vietnam to adopt more fixed and determined tax rules for greater certainty.
Consolidations and Accounting – Traps and Opportunities_TIA PaperBelinda Harrison
This document discusses the interaction between tax consolidation rules and tax effect accounting in Australia. When entities join or exit a tax consolidated group, their deferred tax liabilities (DTL) and deferred tax assets (DTA) are affected.
On entry, an entity's DTL is included in calculating its allocable cost amount (ACA), which resets the tax values of its assets. However, the ACA process may eliminate some of the DTL, as tax values are stepped up. To address this, the law includes a provision to modify the DTL amount. On exit, an entity's DTL remains with the group, but its DTA is transferred to the exiting entity at its book value. This interaction between tax
This document provides a summary of the Electronic Bulletin of Australian Tax Developments. It discusses several key topics from the issue, including:
1) The proposed investment allowance which provides tax deductions for businesses that invest in new depreciating assets or improve existing assets, in an effort to boost capital expenditure.
2) Key details businesses should be aware of regarding the investment allowance, such as the deadlines for entering arrangements and using/installing qualifying assets.
3) Ways businesses can utilize GST rules and cash flow planning to reduce costs and access refunds, including options for changing reporting periods and claiming credits in different circumstances.
4) Tax implications that may arise from asset impairment given current economic conditions
Corporate tax will be levied for all businesses(extraction of natural resources is excluded) and commercial activities across all the emirates in the UAE.
VIETNAM TAX ISSUES – OUTLOOK ON THE EUROPEAN UNION VIETNAM FREE TRADE AGREEME...Dr. Oliver Massmann
The document discusses several issues related to Vietnam's tax system and opportunities under the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EVFTA). It notes inconsistencies in how local tax departments apply tax incentives for businesses and calls for clearer guidance. It also points out complexities for enterprises in complying with the declarations and incentives across different documents. Additionally, it raises concerns about discrimination in value-added tax refunds for businesses with output VAT at 5% compared to exporters. Overall, it advocates for simplifying regulations and ensuring fair and consistent treatment of businesses under Vietnam's tax system.
The document summarizes recent changes to UK taxation of carried interest for non-domiciled individuals working in asset management. Key points include:
- New rules since 2015 remove some tax protections for carried interest, subjecting more of it to UK tax. Carried interest may be taxed as income up to 47% rather than capital gains.
- Legislation differentiates between carried interest from funds held over 40 months versus shorter periods, and employment-related versus other structures.
- From 2017, non-doms deemed UK domiciled after 15+ years will pay UK tax on worldwide income and gains, eliminating remittance basis protections.
- US citizens face potential double taxation as carried interest
Permanent Establishment May Not Be So Permanent (Prepare for Change)Accounting_Whitepapers
The document summarizes the UK's new Diverted Profits Tax (DPT), which seeks to tax profits from UK economic activity that currently avoid UK corporate tax through arrangements deemed "contrived." The 25% DPT will apply to arrangements designed to avoid a UK permanent establishment or that create an "effective tax mismatch." Additionally, proposed changes to permanent establishment definitions in OECD's BEPS Action 7 may also expand the scope of countries' taxing rights. Multinational companies should review their structures and arrangements for potential DPT or BEPS Action 7 impacts and consider establishing a formal UK taxable presence to avoid the DPT.
This document provides an overview of international tax issues and reforms for foreign businesses investing in Australia. It discusses current issues like Australia's thin capitalization rules, dividend exemptions, and changes to the capital gains tax rules. It also covers updates on the OECD's Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project and how foreign tax law changes in countries like the UK and France could impact the Australian tax system. The document is meant to accompany a presentation on these topics and provide context, but not give comprehensive tax advice. It also does not address all potential Australian tax issues relevant for foreign investors.
Submission to the International Monetary Fund's Consultation on Economic "Spi...Dr Lendy Spires
This document provides recommendations from ActionAid International to the IMF's consultation on international tax spillovers. Key points include:
1) International tax reforms should consider macroeconomic impacts and inter-nation equity, not just domestic revenue impacts. Broader effects on financial stability, debt management, and development policy coherence should be analyzed.
2) The IMF is well-placed to develop methodologies for quantifying tax spillovers between countries from changes to domestic tax regimes. Baseline measurements of the international distribution of the corporate tax base would aid future assessments.
3) Reforms aimed at preventing base erosion and profit shifting should explicitly protect lower-income countries' tax bases and rights. Measures permitting source-based
- Accounting for income taxes under AASB 112 requires a balance sheet approach, recognizing deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between an asset or liability's tax base and carrying amount. There is controversy around determining the appropriate tax base, particularly for indefinite life or non-depreciable assets. This impacts whether a deferred tax liability or asset is recognized.
- Upcoming changes in IAS 12 could fundamentally change how Australian entities account for income taxes. This will introduce new rules, procedures, and analysis requirements. The transition will also be challenging.
- There are currently significant practical challenges in preparing and auditing the accounting for income taxes due to the complexity of integrating tax and accounting requirements. This area requires
US desk quarterly newsletter - December 2016 editionVesko Petkov
This document summarizes tax law changes and initiatives across several European countries. It discusses proposed changes to dividend withholding tax rules and hybrid mismatch rules in the Netherlands. For Ireland, it outlines the new Knowledge Development Box tax regime. For Luxembourg, it discusses corporate tax rate reductions and increased transparency requirements around country-by-country reporting and transfer pricing rules. For Germany, it previews potential amendments to tax laws around real estate entities and losses. The UK section forecasts tax implications for multinationals from its upcoming autumn statement.
The document discusses rebalancing the Northern Ireland economy through possible devolution of corporation tax rate setting powers. It outlines the unique economic circumstances of Northern Ireland and potential benefits of lower tax rates in attracting investment. However, it also notes costs and complexities, such as meeting EU state aid rules. The consultation paper seeks input on costs and benefits to better understand the implications of giving Northern Ireland autonomy over its corporation tax rate.
Similar to The MAAL and the proposed Diverted Profits Tax - a comparative (20)
The document discusses tax valuations and market value in the Australian tax system. It provides background on why tax valuations are important, examines contexts where market value is relevant for taxes like capital gains tax and thin capitalization. It discusses the meaning of market value, the ATO's guidelines, and provides examples of how market value applies in contexts like CGT rules, scrip for scrip transactions, and the market value substitution rule.
This document summarizes a corporate governance seminar on tax risk management policies. The seminar will cover why boards need a tax risk management policy, the top three reasons for having one, and international developments in countries like Australia, the UK, and OECD related to tax transparency and risk reporting. It will also discuss New Zealand's tax authority position, the top five tips for an effective tax risk management policy, how to test a policy's effectiveness, and take questions. Contact information is provided for the two partners presenting from MinterEllison.
The document provides an overview of market value and its relevance in the Australian tax system. It discusses when market value is considered, relevant definitions and resources, commonly used valuation methods, and tips for obtaining robust market value evidence. Specifically:
- Market value is relevant for items like asset purchase price allocations, capital gains tax, thin capitalization, and more.
- Key definitions and guidelines come from case law, the ATO Market Valuation Guidelines, and the International Valuation Standards Council.
- Common valuation methods include income, market, cost, and asset-based approaches.
- Practical examples are provided for purchase price allocations, small business CGT relief qualifications, and taxable Australian property calculations.
Australian Tax Law Bulletin - Tax Issues for digital business - Part I - dome...Joanne Dunne
This document provides a case study about an Australian fashion business called It's The New Black (ITNB) that is transitioning to have a digital presence. ITNB operates through an Australian company and generates over $1.7 million in annual revenue. It plans to launch a website to expand its customer base nationally. The document discusses various tax issues that may arise for ITNB, including whether website development costs can be deducted or claimed through other tax offsets. Recurring website costs are generally deductible, while upfront development costs may be capital in nature. The tax treatment of off-the-shelf software, computer hardware, and intellectual property rights associated with the website are also examined.
2015 case review: High ATO auccess rate continuesJoanne Dunne
This document summarizes tax judgments from the Federal Court, Full Federal Court, and High Court of Australia from January to December 2015. It shows that the ATO was highly successful in 2015, winning 76.5% of cases, continuing an improving trend over the past five years due to stronger case selection and management. The summary also analyzes key cases, particularly in financial services, and notes some cases where taxpayers appealed decisions.
Tax Issues for Digital Business - 2016 National Convention paperJoanne Dunne
- ITNB is an Australian fashion business that provides personal shopping and styling services. It wants to expand its business by establishing an online presence in Australia and potentially overseas.
- ITNB is developing a website that will allow clients to get outfit recommendations, fashion advice, and search/request particular designer fashion from their inventory partners. The website will also live stream fashion shows.
- ITNB is negotiating agreements with overseas fashion weeks and has entered contracts with Australian designers, stores, and service providers to operate its digital business. It needs to consider the various Australian and international tax issues that arise from having a digital presence both in Australia and overseas.
Tax issues for Digital Business - 2016 National Convention presentationJoanne Dunne
This document discusses tax issues for digital businesses operating in Australia and globally. It presents a case study of an Australian clothing retailer that expands its operations online and internationally. Key tax issues addressed include income characterization, deductions, GST, permanent establishment rules, controlled foreign corporations, transfer pricing, and the potential future impacts of OECD's BEPS initiatives. The document also briefly covers the ATO's stance on bitcoin transactions and provides tips for structuring digital business operations to manage tax risks and compliance.
The document summarizes recent Australian and foreign tax cases from 2015. Statistically, the ATO won 76.5% of 51 total Australian tax cases in 2015, continuing an upward trend in success rates since 2011. Notable Australian cases included ElecNet, where the Full Court clarified the definition of a "unit trust", and Orica, where the scheme's dominant purpose was found to be obtaining tax deductions. Cases to watch in 2016 include appeals of Chevron, Tech Mahindra, and Financial Synergy Holdings. Foreign cases discussed Trustpower from New Zealand, where feasibility expenditure was found to be capital, and BP Canada Energy, where tax accrual working papers were found to be compellable.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
The MAAL and the proposed Diverted Profits Tax - a comparative
1. The MAAL and the diverted
profits tax - a comparative
by Joanne Dunne, CTA, Partner, MinterEllison, Melbourne
COVER
A diverted profits tax was proposed by the federal government in the 2016-17 Budget. A multinational
anti-avoidance law (MAAL) was enacted in late 2015. Both the MAAL and the diverted profits tax focus on
multinationals that derive $1b or more in group income. The diverted profits tax is proposed to be applicable for
income years following 1 July 2017, but to arrangements whenever they were entered into. This means that the
development of the diverted profits tax should be closely monitored and risk mitigation should be considered.
This article compares the MAAL and the diverted profits tax to demonstrate where they intersect and the
differences between them, and to highlight how these regimes provide a new framework for multinational
taxation in Australia. The article also considers example structures to demonstrate where the MAAL and
proposed diverted profits tax provide the ATO with two additional avenues to attack structures which concern it.
Comparison between the MAAL and the diverted profits tax
Issue
Who it
applies to
MAAL
Sianificant global entities, re entities with
annual global income or consolidated
oroup inCome of ,S1b or more.
Proposed diverted profits tax
The consultation paper' issued by
Treasury on 3 May 2016 states that the
purpose of the diverted profits tax is:
• to provide the ATO with greater
powers to deal with taxpayers who
transfer profits, assets or risks
to offshore related parties using
artificial or contrived arrangements
to avoid Australian tax and who do
not cooperate with the ATO; and
• to ensure that entities operating in
Australia cannot avoid Australian
taxation by transferring profits,
assets or risks offshore through
related party transactions that
lack economic substance, and
to discourage multinationals from
delaying the resolution of transfer
pricing disputes.
The consultation paper suggests
that integrity measures such as the
MAAL were difficult to enforce where a
taxpayer was not cooperative; hence
the need for a diverted profits tax.
Significant global entities, ie entities '.5th
global income or consolidated group
income of Sib or more .andi
Comrnent
The consultation paper on the diverted
profits tax suggests that there is
intentional intersection with the MAAL
to some degree. However, the diverted
profits tax seems to be a proposal
designed to incentivise multinationals
to agree to adjustments under other
provisions, such as the MAAL or
transfer pricing provisions.
both regimes are intended to
apply only to significant global entities,
some differences arise.
Purpose The explanatory memorandum to the
Tax Laws Amendment (Combating
Multinational Avoidance) Bill 2015
(0th) states that the purpose of the
multinational anti-avoidance law
(MAAL) is to counter the erosion of the
Australian tax base by multinational
entities using artificial or contrived
arrangements to avoid the attribution of
business profits to Australia through a
taxable presence in Australia.
• that are Australian tax residents
or have an Australian permanent
establishment: and
• that have Australian turnover
of S25m or more — unless the
Australian turnover is less than $
because income is ar tifici:* hooked
offshore rather than in Australia.
The, diverted protits tax only applies
vvnere there are Australian operations
which have a S25m or greater Australian
tumoi,,,er, and the consultation paper
states that this threshold is intended to
identify taxpayers of lower risk, and to
align i,vith other thresholds. such as the
S2f5m threshold applying to provide for
simplified transfer pricing
TAXATION IN AUSTRALIA I VOL 51(1) 21
2. COVER
Comment
record-keeping requirernents.2 It is also
notable that there is intended to be an
"artificiality" test to be applied by the
ATO when determining whether that
Australian turnover level is breached.
No further detail is provided.
Proposed diverted profits tax
Date in effect ' 1 January 2016
0When it can The MAAL can apply where:
eapply
is there is a scheme under which a
• the foreign entity obtains ordinary
-income or statutory income from the
supply;
is some or all of that income is
not attributable to an Australian
permanent establishment of the
foreign entity; and
• it can be concluded that the scheme
was entered into for the principal
purpose or a principal purpose
of enabling a taxpayer to reduce
Australian taxes or reduce Australian
and foreign taxes (with a deferral
of foreign tax being relevant unless
there are reasonable commercial
grounds for the deferral). The
specified factors taken into account
include the extent of activities
performed in Australia and outside
of Australia relating to the supply.
foreign entity in the group supplies
goods and/or services (other than
equity interests, debt interests or
options over equity or debt interests)
to unrelated Australian customers;
la activities are undertaken in Australia
directly in connection with the
supply;
the Australian activities are
undertaken in whole or in part by an
associated Australian entity or an
Australian permanent establishment
of the foreign entity, or by an
unassociated Australian entity that
is commercially dependent on the
foreign entity;
Proposed to be effective for income
years on or after 1 July 2017 but can
apply to arrangements whenever they
were entered into. There is no legislation
as yet.
The diverted profits tax can apply Some differences arise.
The MAAL is focused on multinational
• there is an effective tax mismatch, ie: groups which may or may not have
• there is a transaction between the associated Australian operations. The
Australian taxpayer and a related MAAL focuses on transactions with
unrelated Australian customers and
considers what part an associated
Australian operation or unassociated
Australian operation (where there is
commercial dependence) plays in the
transactions with those customers.
The MAAL does not have a de minim's
Australian turnover threshold before
..
applicable. The
taxpayer's Australian tax liability, a principal purpose test which is a
For example, if there is a $100 different test to the remainder of Pt IVA
reduction in the Australian of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
taxpayer's Australian tax liability (Cth) (ITAA36).
as a result of a deductible fee,
but the related party only pays
The diverted profits tax focuses on
$60 of tax on the fee income
multinational groups which definitely
in its jurisdiction, there is an
have Australian operations, where those
operations derive Australian turnover
above a $25m de minim's level. It is
focused on transactions between the
Australian taxpayer and a related party
in the multinational group. The diverted
profits tax does not include a purpose
test, rather it applies a "design" test.
there is insufficient economic As is demonstrated by the structure
substance, le it can be reasonably examples below, there are situations
concluded based on the information where the MAAL and diverted profits
available to the ATO that the tax can both be applicable, but the
transaction at issue or structure at diverted profits tax is of potentially wider
issue was designed to secure a tax application •
reduction.
When considering the insufficient
economic substance test, if it can be
shown that the non-tax ficancial benefits
exceed the financial benefit of the tax
reduction, then there may be economic
substance, and the diverted profits tax
may not be applicable.
where:
party cross-border;
the transaction reduces the
Australian taxpayer's Australian
tax; and -
the transaction increases the
related party's tax, but by less
than 80% of the corresponding
reduction in the Australian
effective tax mismatch. Note:
factors which might cause that
tax mismatch to arise, such as
the application of tax relief in a
foreign jurisdiction, are not taken
into account when considering if
a mismatch arises; and
22 TAXATION IN AUSTRALIA I JULY 2016
3. COVER
MAAL
The MAAL applies at the corporate tax
rate (30%)* on Australian income that
ought to have been returned in Australia
(the Commissioner will determine the
arm's length profits attributable to
Australia) plus an additional potential
penalty of 100% of unpaid taxes,— and
interest.
It is possible for the MAAL to apply
to a small Australian business that
is part of a multinational group —
potentially at the small business tax
rate of 28.5% (or 27.5% if the 2016-17
Budget measures are passed).
** Penalties can be up to 120% if
aggravating factors arise, such as
obstructing an ATO officer. The
100% penalty can be reduced if it
can be shown that the taxpayer's
position was reasonably arguable.
Proposed diverted profits tax_ _
The diverted profits tax applies at 40%.
Interest will also be imposed from the
date any amount would have been
subject to income tax to the date of
the provisional diverted profits tax
assessment. While it is not mentioned
directly in the consultation paper,
depending on taxpayer behaviour,
penalties may be applicable as well.
The diverted profits tax can apply
in situations where income arising
between offshore entities is attributed
to Australia. The consultation paper
suggests that in that scenario, when
determining the diverted profits amount
on which the diverted profits tax will .
apply, the ATO may take into account
Australian tax regimes that would have
applied had the profits at issue been
brought to tax in Australia.
For instance, to use a simple example
referred to in the consultation paper:
• Foreign Co is equity funded by
Foreign Parent Co and uses the
funding ($300m) to acquire an asset;
• a related Australia Co leases the
asset from Foreign Co, and claims a
deduction in Australia for the lease
costs of $30m; and
• assume that the ATO takes the
view that the diverted profits tax
tests (effective tax mismatch and
insufficient economic substance)
are satisfied.
The diverted profits tax operates in
this example if the ATO concluded that
absent the above structure, Foreign
Parent Co would have equity funded
Australia Co and Australia Co would
have held the asset. The diverted profits
amount would be calculated as $30m
(being the lease payment made, which
Comment
, The diverted profits tax rate is
: deliberately penal in nature.
The consultation paper states that
the rate has been set "to encourage
•taxpayers to pay the lower corporate tax
rate through complying with Australia's
tax rules".
•It is also notable that the diverted
profits tax sets out an expanded
seven-year statutory time bar (like the
transfer pricing time bar period), strict
timeframes for response by taxpayers
•to a provisional diverted profits tax
. assessment, and then cut-down
timeframes for the ATO to conclude its
diverted profits tax assessment. This
assessment process is further explained
in detail in the consultation paper.
The MAAL assessment process is
consistent with Pt IVA assessment
•processes, and the MAAL does
not have any specifically designed
assessment process. The MAAL gives
the ATO the option of either attributing
income to an Australian related
subsidiary, or deeming a permanent
establishment of the offshore entity to
•arise, and attributing income to that
deemed permanent establishment.
There is some degree of similarity
between the regimes in relation to the
calculation of income — particularly in
focusing on what would have been the ,
position had the scheme or transaction
at issue not occurred.
Issue
The rate of
tax
How the As the MAAL is an anti-avoidance
fr,income that . measure, the ATO has powers under
P.
subject Pt IVA to reconstruct the scheme to
to the tax is counter the tax benefit obtained.
t calculated
The ATO will assume that the foreign
entity had a permanent establishment
in Australia and that some or all of
the activities of the foreign entity were
undertaken by and attributable to that
deemed permanent establishment, and
apply tax to that attributed amount.
In its MAAL client experience roadrnap3
and in LOG 2015/2,4 the ATO suggests
that when determining the income to
which the MAAL could apply, it is for the
taxpayer to prepare a functional analysis
and profit attribution as it would under
the transfer pricing regime. This may of
course allocate deductible expenses
that would have been applicable
to any such deemed permanent
establishment. LCG 2015/2 also
states that compensating adjustments
can be requested by a taxpayer and
determined by the Commissioner under
s 177F(1) ITAA36 to take into account
tax deductions or benefits that would
have been available had the scheme not
been entered into.
TAXATION IN AUSTRALIA I VOL 51(1) 23
4. Where the
regime
sits in the
income tax
legislation
In Pt IVA.
COVER
Issue MAAL Proposed diverted profits tax
represents diverted profits) less an
amount representing the depreciation
that Australia Co would have claimed.
40% tax would be calculated by the
ATO on that net amount.
It should be noted that the diverted
profits tax can apply widely, including
as-an adjunct to the transfer pricing
rules to attack excessive expenses
paid to related parties. In this event, the
diverted profits amount on which the tax
is applied would be the tax benefit from
the excessive expense (le (generally)
30% of the excessive expense).
The diverted profits tax will not provide
a credit for any foreign tax paid, but a
credit may be available for Australian
tax paid on any diverted profits amount
brought to Australian tax (eg under the
controlled foreign company rules).
Not clear yet.
Comment
This is an important issue when
considering Australia's double tax
treaty obligations. While the MAAL is
not an issue in this respect as it sits in
Pt IVA and s 4(2) of theInternational
Tax Agreements Act 1953 (Cth) gives
primacy to Pt IVA, it is not clear where
the diverted profits tax will sit in the
income tax legislation. Given the
manner in which it is described in the
consultation paper, it does not seem
the diverted profits tax will be part of
Pt IVA although, in the absence of actual
•legislation, that is uncertain at this
stage.
, The diverted profits tax can seek to
, impose tax in relation to business profits
derived by an entity resident in another
contracting state. This is in the scenario
where profits are derived between two
•foreign entities in a multinational group,
and the ATO seeks to use the diverted
profits tax to reconstruct the transaction
and attribute some of that income to
Australia. The business profits article
' in an applicable double tax treaty
. may be applicable to provide relief
from the diverted profits tax in those
circumstances. The issue is whether the
. diverted profits tax is a tax that could be
covered by a double tax treaty.
In a number of Australia's double
tax treaties (eg NZ-Australia Treaty,
US-Australia Treaty), "tax" is defined
in art 3 as excluding "any penalty or
interest imposed under the law of
either contracting state relating to its
tax". It may be that Australia seeks to
maintain that despite its title as a "tax",
the diverted profits tax is a "penalty".
This would mean that those double tax
treaties would not affect Australia's right
to impose the diverted profits tax.
24 TAXATION IN AUSTRALIA I JULY 2016
5. Issue MAAL
Where the
regime
sits in the
income tax
legislation
In Pt IVA.
COVER
Proposed diverted profits tax
represents diverted profits) less an
amount representing the depreciation
that Australia Co would have claimed.
40% tax would be calculated by the
ATO on that net amount.
It should be noted that the diverted
profits tax can apply widely, including
as an adjunct to the transfer pricing
rules to attack excessive expenses
paid to related parties. In this event, the
diverted profits amount on which the tax
is applied would be the tax benefit from
the excessive expense fie (generally)
30% of the excessive expense).
The diverted profits tax will not provide
a credit for any foreign tax paid, but a
credit may be available for Australian
r tax paid on any diverted profits amount
brought to Australian tax (eg under the
controlled foreign company rules).
, _
Not clear yet.
Comment
This is an important issue when
considering Australia's double tax
treaty obligations. While the MAAL is
not an issue in this respect as it sits in
Pt IVA and s 4(2) of theInternational
Tax Agreements Act 1953 (Cth) gives
primacy to Pt IVA, it is not clear where
the diverted profits tax will sit in the
income tax legislation. Given the
manner in which it is described in the
consultation paper, it does not seem
, the diverted profits tax will be part of
Pt IVA although, in the absence of actual
legislation, that is uncertain at this
stage.
The diverted profits tax can seek to
impose tax in relation to business profits
derived by an entity resident in another
contracting state. This is in the scenario
. where profits are derived between two
foreign entities in a multinational group,
and the ATO seeks to use the diverted
profits tax to reconstruct the transaction
and attribute some of that income to
Australia. The business profits article
in an applicable double tax treaty
may be applicable to provide relief
from the diverted profits tax in those
circumstances. The issue is whether the
diverted profits tax is a tax that could be
covered by a double tax treaty.
In a number of Australia's double
tax treaties (eg NZ-Australia Treaty,
US-Australia Treaty), "tax" is defined
in art 3 as excluding "any penalty or
interest imposed under the law of
either contracting state relating to its
tax". It may be that Australia seeks to
maintain that despite its title as a "tax",
the diverted profits tax is a "penalty".
This would mean that those double tax
treaties would not affect Australia's right
to impose the diverted profits tax.
24 TAXATION IN AUSTRALIA JULY 2016
6. Unrelated Australian
customers
Cloud Computing
Sub Australia
(5) Sales revenue
Singapore Cloud
Computing Co
(3) Marketing and negotiating
bespoke contracts including
price with customers
(2) Fee
(1) Marketing services
COVER
Issue MAAL Proposed diverted profits tax Comment
In Australia's older treaties (eg
Singapore—Australia Treaty), that penalty
exclusion is not explicit, and instead
the treaty provides that it applies to
Australia's income tax or "any identical
or substantially similar taxes". In
relation to those treaties, it may be that
Australia seeks to maintain that the
diverted profits tax is not an "income
tax" and is also not substantially similar
to an income tax, but is a new tax or a
penalty that is not an "income tax". That
was the position taken by HM Revenue
& Customs in the United Kingdom
when it enacted its own diverted profits
tax (to some criticism). This argument
could support the view that those older
double tax treaties would not affect
Australia's right to impose the diverted
profits tax.
This issue will need to be clarified prior
to the enactment of the proposed
diverted profits tax.
Example structures
1. Sales revenue booked offshore: MAAL and diverted profits tax intersect, both potentially applicable
(4) Finalise sale,
sign contract
MAAL
The MAAL could apply in this
circumstance. This is because Cloud
Computing Sub Australia carries out most
of the functions to secure the contracts
with the unrelated Australian customer,
including contract negotiation, pricing
and bespoke terms. Little real activity
could be perceived to occur in Singapore
where the contracts are concluded. It
could be concluded that the principal
purpose of the arrangement is to ensure
that Australian tax is not paid on the profits
from Australian sales. The multinational is
at risk of the MAAL applying. If the MAAL
applied, profits from Australian sales
could be attributed to Cloud Computing
Sub Australia or to a deemed permanent
establishment of Singapore Cloud
Computing Co, with that attributed income
subject to Australian tax at 30%.
Diverted profits tax
Assuming that the tax rate applicable
in Singapore is less than 80% of
Australia's rate, the issue will be whether
the arrangement with Singapore Cloud
Computing Co has insufficient economic
substance. The issue will be whether the
information available to the ATO might
lead it to conclude that the structure was
designed to secure a tax reduction in
Australia. It will also be critical to consider
the non-tax financial benefits of the
structure and compare those to the value
of the tax reduction. The diverted profits
tax could subject Australian sales income
to tax at 40%.
TAXATION IN AUSTRALIA I VOL 51(1) 25
7. (3) Loan from
Parent(1) Administrative
services
(2) Fee
Cloud Computing
Sub Australia
(4) Interest payment
COVER
2. Sales revenue booked offshore: MAAL may not be applicable, diverted profits tax may still apply
Singapore Cloud
Computing Co (1) Marketing/customer solicitation service
(4)Negotiate and
conclude contracts,
including price
(6)Sales revenue
AND (2) Fee
(5)Finalise Unrelated Australian
customers
Cloud Computing
Sub Australia
(3) Marketing — providing
introduction to Singapore
Cloud Computing Co — no
involvement in contract
provision, finalisation or
negotiation
MAAL
Example 3.6 and example 3.8 in the
explanatory memorandum to the Tax Laws
(Combating Multinational Avoidance) Bill
2015 (Cth) suggest that the MAAL should
not be applicable in this situation as it
cannot be concluded that the scheme was
entered into for the or a principal purpose
of enabling a taxpayer to reduce Australian
taxes. This is because of the lack of any
involvement by Cloud Computing Sub
Australia in concluding sales contracts with
Australian customers.
Diverted profits tax
It seems possible for the diverted profits
tax to nonetheless be applicable — even
where the MAAL does not apply. Assuming
that tax rate applicable in Singapore is less
than 80% of Australia's rate, the issue will
be whether Singapore Cloud Computing
Co has insufficient economic substance.
The issue will be whether the information
available to the ATO might lead it to
conclude that the structure was designed
to secure a tax reduction in Australia, and
whether any non-tax financial benefits can
be shown to exceed the tax benefits from
the structure. It will be important to ensure
that the ATO has sufficient information so
that it does not reach that conclusion. It
seems most likely that where the MAAL
does not apply the diverted profits tax
ought not apply either. The point to note
is that the diverted profits tax imposes a
lower standard, there is no purpose test,
and the ATO may be able to use the tax in
circumstances where Pt IVA requirements
may be more onerous.
3. Deductible payment between related parties: MAAL is not applicable, diverted profits tax could apply
Singapore Cloud
Computing Co
Hong Kong Parent
Cloud Computing Co
MAAL
The MAAL is not relevant to this example.
There is no supply of goods and services
to unrelated Australian customers.
Diverted profits tax
The diverted profits tax can apply.
The fee paid for administrative services
could be deductible to Cloud Computing
Sub Australia and, assuming Singapore's
applicable tax rate is less than 80% of
Australia's rate, there is an effective tax
mismatch. In terms of whether there is
insufficient economic substance, the value
of the services to Cloud Computing Sub
Australia commercially will need to exceed
the financial benefit of the tax reduction.
This may be difficult to establish. The
consultation paper states that the diverted
profits amount will be 30% of the fee
(being the tax benefit obtained from the
deductible fee), and the 40% tax will be
imposed on that amount.
The administrative fee example
demonstrates clear intention to use the
diverted profits tax as a mechanism to
enforce the transfer pricing rules. The ATO
will be able to strategically impose the
diverted profits tax where it is not satisfied
as to compliance with transfer pricing
documentation requirements and with the
amount of a fee. Agreeing to a transfer
pricing adjustment instead leads to a lower
rate of tax (30%) being applied than the
40% diverted profits tax.
The diverted profits tax could also apply
to the loan. Again, this assumes an
interest deduction for Cloud Computing
Sub Australia, and the applicable tax rate
in Hong Kong being less than 80% of
Australia's rate. It also assumes that the
ATO can conclude that there is insufficient
economic substance to the structure —
particularly that the commercial benefits
do not outweigh the benefit of the tax
26 TAXATION IN AUSTRALIA I JULY 2016
8. COVER
2. Sales revenue booked offshore: MAAL may not be applicable, diverted profits tax may still apply
Singapore Cloud
Computing Co (1) Marketing/customer solicitation service
(4)Negotiate and
conclude contracts,
including price
(6)Sales revenue
AND (2) Fee
(5)Finalise Unrelated Australian Cloud Computing
customers Sub Australia
(3) Marketing - providing
introduction to Singapore
Cloud Computing Co - no
involvement in contract
provision, finalisation or
negotiation
MAAL
Example 3.6 and example 3.8 in the
explanatory memorandum to the Tax Laws
(Combating Multinational Avoidance) Bill
2015 (Cth) suggest that the MAAL should
not be applicable in this situation as it
cannot be concluded that the scheme was
entered into for the or a principal purpose
of enabling a taxpayer to reduce Australian
taxes. This is because of the lack of any
involvement by Cloud Computing Sub
Australia in concluding sales contracts with
Australian customers.
Diverted profits tax
It seems possible for the diverted profits
tax to nonetheless be applicable — even
where the MAAL does not apply. Assuming
that tax rate applicable in Singapore is less
than 80% of Australia's rate, the issue will
be whether Singapore Cloud Computing
Co has insufficient economic substance.
The issue will be whether the information
available to the ATO might lead it to
conclude that the structure was designed
to secure a tax reduction in Australia, and
whether any non-tax financial benefits can
be shown to exceed the tax benefits from
the structure. It will be important to ensure
that the ATO has sufficient information so
that it does not reach that conclusion. It
seems most likely that where the MAAL
does not apply the diverted profits tax
ought not apply either. The point to note
is that the diverted profits tax imposes a
lower standard, there is no purpose test,
and the ATO may be able to use the tax in
circumstances where Pt IVA requirements
may be more onerous.
3. Deductible payment between related parties: MAAL is not applicable, diverted profits tax could apply
Singapore Cloud
Computing Co
Hong Kong Parent
Cloud Computing Co
1
(2) Fee
(1) Administrative
services
(3) Loan from
Parent
(4) Interest payment
Cloud Computing
Sub Australia
MAAL
The MAAL is not relevant to this example.
There is no supply of goods and services
to unrelated Australian customers.
Diverted profits tax
The diverted profits tax can apply.
The fee paid for administrative services
could be deductible to Cloud Computing
Sub Australia and, assuming Singapore's
applicable tax rate is less than 80% of
Australia's rate, there is an effective tax
mismatch. In terms of whether there is
insufficient economic substance, the value
of the services to Cloud Computing Sub
Australia commercially will need to exceed
the financial benefit of the tax reduction.
This may be difficult to establish. The
consultation paper states that the diverted
profits amount will be 30% of the fee
(being the tax benefit obtained from the
deductible fee), and the 40% tax will be
imposed on that amount.
The administrative fee example
demonstrates clear intention to use the
diverted profits tax as a mechanism to
enforce the transfer pricing rules. The ATO
will be able to strategically impose the
diverted profits tax where it is not satisfied
as to compliance with transfer pricing
documentation requirements and with the
amount of a fee. Agreeing to a transfer
pricing adjustment instead leads to a lower
rate of tax (30%) being applied than the
40% diverted profits tax.
The diverted profits tax could also apply
to the loan. Again, this assumes an
interest deduction for Cloud Computing
Sub Australia, and the applicable tax rate
in Hong Kong being less than 80% of
Australia's rate. It also assumes that the
ATO can conclude that there is insufficient
economic substance to the structure —
particularly that the commercial benefits
do not outweigh the benefit of the tax
26 TAXATION IN AUSTRALIA I JULY 2016
9. 24TH NO.OSA. .
TAX INTENSIVE
The SME Operating Theatre
— Is a Check-up Sufficient or
Do You Need Radical Surgery?
Those in the profession of giving tax advice to SME clients
urgently need to mark the 10th and llth of November
in your diaries to attend the 24th Noosa Tax Intensive.
You won't want to miss the compelling line-up of speakers
and valuable networking opportunities, all presented
to you in the incomparable surrounds of Noosa.
10-11 November 2016
Sofitel Noosa Pacific Resort
THE TAX INSTITUTE
PROGRAM To register your interest contact
AVAILABLE Carlie Lemon on 07 3225 5200 or
SOON carlielemon@taxinstitute.com.au
COVER
reduction in Australia. The consultation
paper states that the loan falls within thin
capitalisation safe harbours that protects
the amount of debt, but the diverted
profits tax could still apply to the "pricing
of the debt" — presumably the interest
rate. Again, it seems that the diverted
profits tax is a back up to transfer pricing
provisions in this regard. The consultation
paper suggests that the actual amount of
debt could also be challenged assuming
thin capitalisation safe harbours are not
met; again, a back up to transfer pricing
adjustment provisions as well as to the
thin capitalisation regime. However, if thin
capitalisation safe harbours are not met,
there may be no interest deduction and
it is hard to see what the tax reduction is
in Australia giving rise to an effective tax
mismatch. The point to note is that diverted
profits tax potentially has a wide reach,
particularly given the UK's diverted profits
tax carves out most loans, in main part on
the basis that its thin capitalisation and
transfer pricing rules effectively manage
the issue.
Joanne Dunne, CTA
Partner
MinterEllison, Melbourne
References
1 Treasury,Implementing a diverted profits tax,
consultation paper, 3 May 2016.
2 ATO, "Simplifying transfer pricing record keeping",
ATO guide, January 2016. Available at www.ato.gov.
au/business/international-tax-for-busIness/in-detail/
transfer-pricing/simplifying-transfer-pricing-record-
keeping/.
3 ATO,MAAL client experience roadmap, a guide to
assist taxpayers transition to compliance with the
new MAAL provisions, 12 January 2016. Available
at www.ato.gov.au/law/view/pdf/cgl/maal_client_
experience_roadmap.pdf.
4 LCG 2015/2. Available at www.ato.gov.au/law/view/
yiew.htm?srcehs&pit=99991231235958&aro=false&s
tart.18.pageSize=108,total=1&num=0&docid-COG%
2FLCG20152%2FNAT%2FATO%2F00001&dc=false&t
m=and-basic-Icg 2015%2F2#P29.
TAXATION IN AUSTRALIA VOL 51(1) 27