1) An inspector is interrogating a suspect who has provided 4 different alibis for the same time, making them impossible. The suspect claims they were at a bar but the inspector does not believe them. 2) When the inspector mentions finding the victim Mikey in Morristown, the woods, the suspect had not mentioned this location before, indicating they may have been involved. 3) The inspector grows frustrated with the suspect for not being truthful and claims they know the suspect was somewhere else, in the woods, at the time of the crime.

1. "The Interrogation"
written by
Arthur Piel
Based on the 180 rule scene in "Training Day"
arthur.piel@tts.edu.sg

2. Created using Celtx
1 INT. INTERROGATION ROOM - NIGHT
SUSPECT
(Troubled)
I- I- I was there. You can ask Mikey.
INSPECTOR
(Frustrated)
Mikey's dead.
They both sit in silence.
SUSPECT
I didn't do it.
The INSPECTOR stands up and starts pacing around the room.
INSPECTOR
(Aggressively)
It's been 3 hours and you've given me
4 different alibi's, each one of them
being in 4 different places at the
same time, how is this possible?
SUSPECT
(Troubled)
I-I just can't right now.
INSPECTOR
Listen, I know you did it. I just want
to know why?
SUSPECT
(Shyly)
I was at the bar.
The INSPECTOR sits back down
INSPECTOR
(Aggressively)
What I don't want is for me to give
you respect and for you to treat me
like a dumb***. You can't even sit up
and look at me.
(Pause)
We know you weren't at the bar, you
were somewhere else. I know that you
went into the woods.
SUSPECT
I was not in Morristown. I was at the

3. 2.
Created using Celtx
bar I already told you.
INSPECTOR
(Curiously)
Morristown? That's where we found
Mikey. Who else would know where we
found him but the killer?