The document discusses media framing of the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings, analyzing how 10 news articles from major US newspapers and CNN portrayed America's victimhood and the identity of the perpetrators in the days after the attack. On the first day when the perpetrators were unknown, some articles implicitly connected the bombings to Islamic terrorism through references to 9/11. The articles also constructed an emotive narrative of American patriotism and victimhood through vivid imagery and historical references. After the suspects were identified as Chechen brothers, coverage shifted to framing them as foreign enemies from the Caucasus region.
The costs and consequences of drone warfare MICHAEL J. BOYLE*MYO AUNG Myanmar
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2346.12002/epdf
file:///C:/Users/aung/Downloads/BOYLE-2013-International_Affairs.pdf
On 21 June 2010, Pakistani American Faisal Shahzad told a judge in a Manhattan
federal court that he placed a bomb at a busy intersection in Times Square as
payback for the US occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq and for its worldwide use
of drone strikes. When the judge asked how Shahzad could be comfortable killing
innocent people, including women and children, he responded: ‘Well, the drone
hits in Afghanistan and Iraq, they don’t see children, they don’t see anybody. They
kill women, children, they kill everybody. It’s a war and in war, they kill people.
They’re killing all Muslims.’1
In a videotape released after his arrest, Shahzad
revealed that among his motives for the attack on New York City was revenge
for the death of Baitullah Mehsud, a Pakistani Taliban leader killed in a drone
strike in August 2009.2
While his comments were reported in the American press,
the Obama administration never acknowledged that it was revulsion over drone
strikes—which Shahzad was rumoured to have seen at first hand when training
with militant groups in Pakistan—that prompted his attack.3
In his official statement
on the attack, President Obama fell back on language reminiscent of his
predecessor to describe Shahzad as just another of those ‘who would attack our
citizens and who would slaughter innocent men, women and children in pursuit
of their murderous agenda’ and ‘will stop at nothing to kill and disrupt our way of
life’.4
That the Times Square attack was blowback from the growing use of drone
strikes in Afghanistan, Pakistan and elsewhere was never admitted.
Binary Discourse in U.S. Presidential Speeches from FDR to Bush IIIOSR Journals
The contemporary study of American Presidential rhetoric is of great significance. Politics is very largely the use of language. Presidential speech and action increasingly reflect the opinion that speaking is governing. In fact, the power of the presidency depends on its ability to persuade. The application of power is often legitimized through rhetorical persuasion; and, in the case of American Presidents, such power, and its associated rhetoric, becomes the fulcrum upon which many global issues turn
This document summarizes a study examining public attitudes towards balancing civil liberties and security measures in response to terrorism across five European countries: Norway, England, Poland, Bulgaria, and Ukraine. It finds that while the threat of terrorism is most visible and direct in England, perceptions of risk more than religion directly influence attitudes about sacrificing civil liberties for security. Focus group discussions in England showed high visibility of past and present terrorism but an externalization of blame onto atypical outsiders, including some born in England.
Violence between the united states and iraqKeith Cavalli
The United States invasion of Iraq destabilized the country and created an environment conducive to violence and terrorism. Insurgents gained valuable combat experience fighting US forces, establishing Iraq as a training ground for terrorists. The US policy of targeted drone strikes against terrorists may have completed a self-reinforcing cycle of violence by creating new militants seeking retribution. Destroyed infrastructure and cultural sites in Iraq serve as constant reminders of fragility and death, strengthening support for violent ideologies. Experienced insurgents from Iraq have spread to other conflicts, and the cycle of US targeted killings and terrorist creation could continue indefinitely.
The U.S. Military Industrial Complex: A Diagrammatic Representationelegantbrain
This document provides an overview of President Eisenhower's concept of the "military industrial complex" and how it has grown significantly since his warning. It describes the military industrial complex as a conglomerate of weapons manufacturers, suppliers, and intelligence agencies that influence policy and budget priorities through political lobbying. While initially dismissed, Eisenhower's warning has become increasingly relevant as the complex continues expanding and influencing foreign policy decisions and budgets, to the detriment of domestic priorities and quality of life. The document also discusses how U.S. militarism and interventions abroad have negatively impacted people in other countries and can result in "blowback" such as terrorist attacks on U.S. soil.
How to Reverse the Tide of War. A Global People’s Movement. Say No to Nuclear...Chris Helweg
- The document discusses the need for a legitimate anti-war movement that challenges the propaganda and lies used to justify wars. It argues that an effective movement must: 1) Fully expose the lies and complicity of governments in terrorist attacks like 9/11 that are used as pretexts for war. 2) Question the legitimacy of political leaders rather than just protest their policies. 3) Work to undermine the propaganda that sustains public support for wars by spreading truthful information. A movement funded or influenced by those who profit from war will not succeed in preventing war.
This document provides a summary of terrorism and hijackings throughout history. It discusses how terrorism has existed for as long as civilization and how the modern age of terrorism began in 1968 with the hijacking of an Israeli plane. While hijackings declined in the US after security measures in the 1970s, they still occurred elsewhere in the world throughout the 1990s. The document also examines the differences between hijackings and terrorist attacks, noting that not all hijackings have political motives. Finally, it provides context on the relative risk of death from terrorism compared to other causes.
In this summary, the document analyzes a 2005 speech by former U.S. President George W. Bush given at Fort Bragg, NC to justify continuing the war in Iraq. The analysis finds that Bush's language employs linguistic mechanisms of coercion, dissimulation, and legitimization/delegitimization. Specifically, Bush uses vague terms like "freedom" and "radicalism" to portray the war as necessary for security. He also frequently distinguishes between "we" as the moral American people and "they" as the dehumanized, irrational enemy in order to garner patriotic support for the war and delegitimize resistance. The analysis concludes the speech reflects the American cultural context and effectively appeals to patriotic
The costs and consequences of drone warfare MICHAEL J. BOYLE*MYO AUNG Myanmar
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2346.12002/epdf
file:///C:/Users/aung/Downloads/BOYLE-2013-International_Affairs.pdf
On 21 June 2010, Pakistani American Faisal Shahzad told a judge in a Manhattan
federal court that he placed a bomb at a busy intersection in Times Square as
payback for the US occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq and for its worldwide use
of drone strikes. When the judge asked how Shahzad could be comfortable killing
innocent people, including women and children, he responded: ‘Well, the drone
hits in Afghanistan and Iraq, they don’t see children, they don’t see anybody. They
kill women, children, they kill everybody. It’s a war and in war, they kill people.
They’re killing all Muslims.’1
In a videotape released after his arrest, Shahzad
revealed that among his motives for the attack on New York City was revenge
for the death of Baitullah Mehsud, a Pakistani Taliban leader killed in a drone
strike in August 2009.2
While his comments were reported in the American press,
the Obama administration never acknowledged that it was revulsion over drone
strikes—which Shahzad was rumoured to have seen at first hand when training
with militant groups in Pakistan—that prompted his attack.3
In his official statement
on the attack, President Obama fell back on language reminiscent of his
predecessor to describe Shahzad as just another of those ‘who would attack our
citizens and who would slaughter innocent men, women and children in pursuit
of their murderous agenda’ and ‘will stop at nothing to kill and disrupt our way of
life’.4
That the Times Square attack was blowback from the growing use of drone
strikes in Afghanistan, Pakistan and elsewhere was never admitted.
Binary Discourse in U.S. Presidential Speeches from FDR to Bush IIIOSR Journals
The contemporary study of American Presidential rhetoric is of great significance. Politics is very largely the use of language. Presidential speech and action increasingly reflect the opinion that speaking is governing. In fact, the power of the presidency depends on its ability to persuade. The application of power is often legitimized through rhetorical persuasion; and, in the case of American Presidents, such power, and its associated rhetoric, becomes the fulcrum upon which many global issues turn
This document summarizes a study examining public attitudes towards balancing civil liberties and security measures in response to terrorism across five European countries: Norway, England, Poland, Bulgaria, and Ukraine. It finds that while the threat of terrorism is most visible and direct in England, perceptions of risk more than religion directly influence attitudes about sacrificing civil liberties for security. Focus group discussions in England showed high visibility of past and present terrorism but an externalization of blame onto atypical outsiders, including some born in England.
Violence between the united states and iraqKeith Cavalli
The United States invasion of Iraq destabilized the country and created an environment conducive to violence and terrorism. Insurgents gained valuable combat experience fighting US forces, establishing Iraq as a training ground for terrorists. The US policy of targeted drone strikes against terrorists may have completed a self-reinforcing cycle of violence by creating new militants seeking retribution. Destroyed infrastructure and cultural sites in Iraq serve as constant reminders of fragility and death, strengthening support for violent ideologies. Experienced insurgents from Iraq have spread to other conflicts, and the cycle of US targeted killings and terrorist creation could continue indefinitely.
The U.S. Military Industrial Complex: A Diagrammatic Representationelegantbrain
This document provides an overview of President Eisenhower's concept of the "military industrial complex" and how it has grown significantly since his warning. It describes the military industrial complex as a conglomerate of weapons manufacturers, suppliers, and intelligence agencies that influence policy and budget priorities through political lobbying. While initially dismissed, Eisenhower's warning has become increasingly relevant as the complex continues expanding and influencing foreign policy decisions and budgets, to the detriment of domestic priorities and quality of life. The document also discusses how U.S. militarism and interventions abroad have negatively impacted people in other countries and can result in "blowback" such as terrorist attacks on U.S. soil.
How to Reverse the Tide of War. A Global People’s Movement. Say No to Nuclear...Chris Helweg
- The document discusses the need for a legitimate anti-war movement that challenges the propaganda and lies used to justify wars. It argues that an effective movement must: 1) Fully expose the lies and complicity of governments in terrorist attacks like 9/11 that are used as pretexts for war. 2) Question the legitimacy of political leaders rather than just protest their policies. 3) Work to undermine the propaganda that sustains public support for wars by spreading truthful information. A movement funded or influenced by those who profit from war will not succeed in preventing war.
This document provides a summary of terrorism and hijackings throughout history. It discusses how terrorism has existed for as long as civilization and how the modern age of terrorism began in 1968 with the hijacking of an Israeli plane. While hijackings declined in the US after security measures in the 1970s, they still occurred elsewhere in the world throughout the 1990s. The document also examines the differences between hijackings and terrorist attacks, noting that not all hijackings have political motives. Finally, it provides context on the relative risk of death from terrorism compared to other causes.
In this summary, the document analyzes a 2005 speech by former U.S. President George W. Bush given at Fort Bragg, NC to justify continuing the war in Iraq. The analysis finds that Bush's language employs linguistic mechanisms of coercion, dissimulation, and legitimization/delegitimization. Specifically, Bush uses vague terms like "freedom" and "radicalism" to portray the war as necessary for security. He also frequently distinguishes between "we" as the moral American people and "they" as the dehumanized, irrational enemy in order to garner patriotic support for the war and delegitimize resistance. The analysis concludes the speech reflects the American cultural context and effectively appeals to patriotic
A Review on Hinnebusch's Article "American Invasion of Iraq: causes and Conse...Atam Motufoua
This review highlights some of the main arguments in the journal article "American invasion of Iraq: Causes and consequences". It also include personal comments.
This document discusses the rise of Islamophobia in America since 9/11. It defines Islamophobia as the fear of Islam and Muslims, and argues that American media, policies, and public perception have become increasingly Islamophobic since the 2001 terrorist attacks. Specifically, 9/11 caused American fears of foreign threats to rise to the forefront and influenced both media coverage and national security policies in anti-Muslim ways. While Islamophobia has existed in America since its founding, 9/11 marked a significant shift that has perpetuated stereotypes of Muslims and limited their rights and acceptance within American communities.
This document discusses the problem of homegrown terrorism and self-radicalization in the United States. It notes that since 9/11, nearly half of terrorist plots against the US have been carried out by American citizens or residents who became radicalized in the US. While domestic attacks cause fear, they result in far fewer deaths than international terrorism. However, terrorist organizations see value in recruiting and radicalizing Americans due to their ability to move freely within the US and between countries. The document examines past cases of self-radicalization and discusses the process of becoming radicalized through consuming terrorist propaganda online and communicating with terrorist recruiters. It argues that homegrown terrorism remains a threat and more must be done to identify and stop self-
The document discusses the ethics of hibakusha victims of nuclear weapons and argues that their narrative of "nuclear universalism" and calls for reconciliation over aggression challenge the realpolitik framework of nation-states. It analyzes how collective memories are shaped by symbols and narratives that are selectively promoted to legitimize political stances. The hibakusha ethics perspective contends that nuclear weapons affect all humanity and advocates non-violent approaches, but this view has not entered mainstream international discourse dominated by justifications for state power.
The document provides a detailed summary of the book "Imperial Overstretch" which argues that George W. Bush fundamentally changed America's place in the world for the worse during his presidency. It discusses how the book claims Bush used 9/11 as an opportunity to extend American imperialism globally rather than a tragedy. The summary also examines how the book argues the US government and media have historically manipulated information and education to promote imperialism and war. It concludes by noting the book was written in 2004 and so does not cover recent changes to the war on terrorism, suggesting a more updated text may be more relevant now.
Democratic Great Power Support for Contested Autocracy: Understanding the U.S...Jason Fasano
Undergraduate honors thesis investigating the role homophily (ideological similarity) and expected utility play in US foreign policy formation, utilizing empirical evidence from the 2011 Arab Uprisings in Bahrain, Syria, Egypt, and Libya.
This document discusses the complex relationship between the media and the government during times of war. It provides several examples from different conflicts to illustrate how the media's role has changed over time and been influenced by the level of censorship and information control imposed by the government. While the media aims to act as a watchdog, it often relies too heavily on official sources, limiting its ability to independently question government policy. The document also analyzes how both the government and opposition parties seek to characterize media coverage and criticism of war policy as being unpatriotic or aiding the enemy.
The document discusses the role of media in times of war from a normative and empirical perspective. It analyzes media coverage and the relationship between the media and government during WWII, Vietnam, Grenada, Gulf War I, and the Iraq War. It notes that the media often relies on official government sources and is restricted in what it can report during wars. The media's role often shifts from watchdog to being more aligned with the government perspective.
Topic: Sociology on terror: How does violence turn the body into a sign?
Order type: Term Paper
Subject: Sociology
Academic level: Undergraduate
Style: CU Harvard
Language: English US
Pages: 6 (double spaced, Times New Roman, 12 Font)
Sources: 6
Surname 1 namecourseinstitutiondatewill the spread of mayank272369
Democratic peace theory proposes that democracies rarely go to war with each other due to institutional constraints and shared democratic values of restraint and nonviolence. However, critics argue that the theory has drawbacks. It does not adequately explain why democracies are peaceful or define key terms. Some evidence suggests economic interdependence between wealthy democracies, not democracy itself, prevents conflict. The theory has also been used to justify foreign policy that promotes democracy through force, which can undermine self-determination and be viewed as imperialism. Elected governments supported by democracies may not always pursue democratic and peaceful agendas.
The Arab Spring from a Counter-Terrorism PerspectivePLETZ.com -
This document summarizes a presentation on the Arab Spring and counter-terrorism given by Dr. Boaz Ganor. In 3 sentences:
Dr. Ganor argues that there is a war within Islam between radical Islamic culture and the rest of the world, including most Muslims. He warns that Islamist groups are gaining power and influence across the Middle East, strengthening the Iranian axis. The West should establish an economic support program similar to the Marshall Plan to help pragmatic regimes in the region and promote moderate interpretations of Islam.
PaperHive Conversations_ Greg McLaughlin - PaperHive MagazineManuel Sierra Alonso
Greg McLaughlin is a sociologist and writer who has authored several books on media coverage of significant events. This interview discusses two key changes in war media coverage between editions of his book The War Correspondent: the rise of embedded journalists which allows military control over reporting, and the impact of social media which provides immediate information but also propaganda risks. McLaughlin believes citizens must seek alternative sources of information to get a more complete picture beyond the official narratives presented by corporate media sources.
S chapter1 theidiot’sguidetocriticalracetheomayank272369
This summary provides an overview of the key points in the document:
1) Critical race theory examines how racism is embedded within systems of power and how it shapes political, economic, and social structures and policies.
2) The document introduces concepts from critical race theorists like Charles Mills who argue that white supremacy creates a system that channels resources to white people and is maintained through ignorance about systemic racism.
3) It discusses how education in the US often fails to teach about systemic racism and links between past and present, leading many to deny that racism still exists or impacts society. The election of Obama was used by some to argue racism is no longer a serious problem.
The document discusses the relationship between the Pentagon and Hollywood, and the extent of Pentagon influence over how the US military is portrayed in films. It notes that the Pentagon provides military resources and assistance to films in exchange for having input and approval over scripts and characters. While this has resulted in some very patriotic films, it has also led to criticisms that the Pentagon pressures Hollywood to present an overly positive image of the US military and to make historical events seem more compatible with the Pentagon's views. The relationship and Pentagon influence continues today whenever films seek the Pentagon's cooperation.
This document discusses how global jihadist groups have tactically adopted terrorism as an insurgent tactic. It argues that the US needs to redefine these groups as radical Islamic insurgencies using terrorist tactics, rather than solely terrorist groups. The document examines the differences between insurgency and terrorism, and how groups have adopted terrorist tactics for their coercive effects. It recommends that the US improve its understanding of why groups adopt different tactics and view them as strategic choices based on factors like resources and environment, rather than fixed labels, to better counter future insurgent threats.
The document discusses how media can help terrorists achieve their goals of spreading fear and influencing public perception. It argues that media sometimes plays a negative role by exaggerating the scale of terrorism, misinforming the public, provoking overreactions, legitimizing terrorist acts, and romanticizing terrorists. The document provides examples showing how extensive media coverage of terrorist incidents can make the problem seem larger than it is statistically. It also suggests that media should adopt policies to limit exaggerated or misleading coverage that could further terrorists' objectives.
This document provides a critical analysis of the difference between jihad and terrorism. It discusses that terrorism refers to a group that develops terror in opposition to something, while jihad essentially means to fight against sin. Terrorism targets governments, religions, or societies, while jihadists typically threaten ruling systems and governments. The document then examines different types of terrorism and jihadists, the harms they cause, and how to determine if a jihadist group is justified or not. It concludes that powerful nations often label jihadist groups like Al-Qaeda as anti-religious to turn public opinion against them, but their actions show they are fighting for national freedom rather than being anti-religious.
The document discusses the role of media framing and propaganda in shaping public perceptions of war, using the 2003 Iraq War and Al-Jazeera as case studies. It explores how the US military embedded journalists to control the narrative and open their operations to reduce perceptions of spin. In contrast, Al-Jazeera's independent reporting from Iraq provided alternative perspectives that countered the Western narrative and gave voice to Iraqi civilians. The document questions whether global news can be fit for purpose or if alternatives like Al-Jazeera are needed to balance hegemonic media versions of reality.
Threats, risks, conflicts and human securitySinead Smith
This essay aspires to analyse a particular terrorist attack through the application of a critical perspective on terrorism as described by Jackson, Smyth and Gunning (2010).
Terrorism has become a global phenomenon with a 61% increase in the number of people killed in terrorist attacks over the last year. The 2014 Global Terrorism Index provides a fact-based understanding of terrorism and its impact.
There is an urgent need for world community to fight terrorism together. There can not be good terrorist and bad terrorist A terrorist is a terrorist
A Review on Hinnebusch's Article "American Invasion of Iraq: causes and Conse...Atam Motufoua
This review highlights some of the main arguments in the journal article "American invasion of Iraq: Causes and consequences". It also include personal comments.
This document discusses the rise of Islamophobia in America since 9/11. It defines Islamophobia as the fear of Islam and Muslims, and argues that American media, policies, and public perception have become increasingly Islamophobic since the 2001 terrorist attacks. Specifically, 9/11 caused American fears of foreign threats to rise to the forefront and influenced both media coverage and national security policies in anti-Muslim ways. While Islamophobia has existed in America since its founding, 9/11 marked a significant shift that has perpetuated stereotypes of Muslims and limited their rights and acceptance within American communities.
This document discusses the problem of homegrown terrorism and self-radicalization in the United States. It notes that since 9/11, nearly half of terrorist plots against the US have been carried out by American citizens or residents who became radicalized in the US. While domestic attacks cause fear, they result in far fewer deaths than international terrorism. However, terrorist organizations see value in recruiting and radicalizing Americans due to their ability to move freely within the US and between countries. The document examines past cases of self-radicalization and discusses the process of becoming radicalized through consuming terrorist propaganda online and communicating with terrorist recruiters. It argues that homegrown terrorism remains a threat and more must be done to identify and stop self-
The document discusses the ethics of hibakusha victims of nuclear weapons and argues that their narrative of "nuclear universalism" and calls for reconciliation over aggression challenge the realpolitik framework of nation-states. It analyzes how collective memories are shaped by symbols and narratives that are selectively promoted to legitimize political stances. The hibakusha ethics perspective contends that nuclear weapons affect all humanity and advocates non-violent approaches, but this view has not entered mainstream international discourse dominated by justifications for state power.
The document provides a detailed summary of the book "Imperial Overstretch" which argues that George W. Bush fundamentally changed America's place in the world for the worse during his presidency. It discusses how the book claims Bush used 9/11 as an opportunity to extend American imperialism globally rather than a tragedy. The summary also examines how the book argues the US government and media have historically manipulated information and education to promote imperialism and war. It concludes by noting the book was written in 2004 and so does not cover recent changes to the war on terrorism, suggesting a more updated text may be more relevant now.
Democratic Great Power Support for Contested Autocracy: Understanding the U.S...Jason Fasano
Undergraduate honors thesis investigating the role homophily (ideological similarity) and expected utility play in US foreign policy formation, utilizing empirical evidence from the 2011 Arab Uprisings in Bahrain, Syria, Egypt, and Libya.
This document discusses the complex relationship between the media and the government during times of war. It provides several examples from different conflicts to illustrate how the media's role has changed over time and been influenced by the level of censorship and information control imposed by the government. While the media aims to act as a watchdog, it often relies too heavily on official sources, limiting its ability to independently question government policy. The document also analyzes how both the government and opposition parties seek to characterize media coverage and criticism of war policy as being unpatriotic or aiding the enemy.
The document discusses the role of media in times of war from a normative and empirical perspective. It analyzes media coverage and the relationship between the media and government during WWII, Vietnam, Grenada, Gulf War I, and the Iraq War. It notes that the media often relies on official government sources and is restricted in what it can report during wars. The media's role often shifts from watchdog to being more aligned with the government perspective.
Topic: Sociology on terror: How does violence turn the body into a sign?
Order type: Term Paper
Subject: Sociology
Academic level: Undergraduate
Style: CU Harvard
Language: English US
Pages: 6 (double spaced, Times New Roman, 12 Font)
Sources: 6
Surname 1 namecourseinstitutiondatewill the spread of mayank272369
Democratic peace theory proposes that democracies rarely go to war with each other due to institutional constraints and shared democratic values of restraint and nonviolence. However, critics argue that the theory has drawbacks. It does not adequately explain why democracies are peaceful or define key terms. Some evidence suggests economic interdependence between wealthy democracies, not democracy itself, prevents conflict. The theory has also been used to justify foreign policy that promotes democracy through force, which can undermine self-determination and be viewed as imperialism. Elected governments supported by democracies may not always pursue democratic and peaceful agendas.
The Arab Spring from a Counter-Terrorism PerspectivePLETZ.com -
This document summarizes a presentation on the Arab Spring and counter-terrorism given by Dr. Boaz Ganor. In 3 sentences:
Dr. Ganor argues that there is a war within Islam between radical Islamic culture and the rest of the world, including most Muslims. He warns that Islamist groups are gaining power and influence across the Middle East, strengthening the Iranian axis. The West should establish an economic support program similar to the Marshall Plan to help pragmatic regimes in the region and promote moderate interpretations of Islam.
PaperHive Conversations_ Greg McLaughlin - PaperHive MagazineManuel Sierra Alonso
Greg McLaughlin is a sociologist and writer who has authored several books on media coverage of significant events. This interview discusses two key changes in war media coverage between editions of his book The War Correspondent: the rise of embedded journalists which allows military control over reporting, and the impact of social media which provides immediate information but also propaganda risks. McLaughlin believes citizens must seek alternative sources of information to get a more complete picture beyond the official narratives presented by corporate media sources.
S chapter1 theidiot’sguidetocriticalracetheomayank272369
This summary provides an overview of the key points in the document:
1) Critical race theory examines how racism is embedded within systems of power and how it shapes political, economic, and social structures and policies.
2) The document introduces concepts from critical race theorists like Charles Mills who argue that white supremacy creates a system that channels resources to white people and is maintained through ignorance about systemic racism.
3) It discusses how education in the US often fails to teach about systemic racism and links between past and present, leading many to deny that racism still exists or impacts society. The election of Obama was used by some to argue racism is no longer a serious problem.
The document discusses the relationship between the Pentagon and Hollywood, and the extent of Pentagon influence over how the US military is portrayed in films. It notes that the Pentagon provides military resources and assistance to films in exchange for having input and approval over scripts and characters. While this has resulted in some very patriotic films, it has also led to criticisms that the Pentagon pressures Hollywood to present an overly positive image of the US military and to make historical events seem more compatible with the Pentagon's views. The relationship and Pentagon influence continues today whenever films seek the Pentagon's cooperation.
This document discusses how global jihadist groups have tactically adopted terrorism as an insurgent tactic. It argues that the US needs to redefine these groups as radical Islamic insurgencies using terrorist tactics, rather than solely terrorist groups. The document examines the differences between insurgency and terrorism, and how groups have adopted terrorist tactics for their coercive effects. It recommends that the US improve its understanding of why groups adopt different tactics and view them as strategic choices based on factors like resources and environment, rather than fixed labels, to better counter future insurgent threats.
The document discusses how media can help terrorists achieve their goals of spreading fear and influencing public perception. It argues that media sometimes plays a negative role by exaggerating the scale of terrorism, misinforming the public, provoking overreactions, legitimizing terrorist acts, and romanticizing terrorists. The document provides examples showing how extensive media coverage of terrorist incidents can make the problem seem larger than it is statistically. It also suggests that media should adopt policies to limit exaggerated or misleading coverage that could further terrorists' objectives.
This document provides a critical analysis of the difference between jihad and terrorism. It discusses that terrorism refers to a group that develops terror in opposition to something, while jihad essentially means to fight against sin. Terrorism targets governments, religions, or societies, while jihadists typically threaten ruling systems and governments. The document then examines different types of terrorism and jihadists, the harms they cause, and how to determine if a jihadist group is justified or not. It concludes that powerful nations often label jihadist groups like Al-Qaeda as anti-religious to turn public opinion against them, but their actions show they are fighting for national freedom rather than being anti-religious.
The document discusses the role of media framing and propaganda in shaping public perceptions of war, using the 2003 Iraq War and Al-Jazeera as case studies. It explores how the US military embedded journalists to control the narrative and open their operations to reduce perceptions of spin. In contrast, Al-Jazeera's independent reporting from Iraq provided alternative perspectives that countered the Western narrative and gave voice to Iraqi civilians. The document questions whether global news can be fit for purpose or if alternatives like Al-Jazeera are needed to balance hegemonic media versions of reality.
Threats, risks, conflicts and human securitySinead Smith
This essay aspires to analyse a particular terrorist attack through the application of a critical perspective on terrorism as described by Jackson, Smyth and Gunning (2010).
Terrorism has become a global phenomenon with a 61% increase in the number of people killed in terrorist attacks over the last year. The 2014 Global Terrorism Index provides a fact-based understanding of terrorism and its impact.
There is an urgent need for world community to fight terrorism together. There can not be good terrorist and bad terrorist A terrorist is a terrorist
Through the News Prism: Visions of Papua New Guinea in the British MediaAlice C Woodward
A study of British news coverage of Papua New Guinea over a 14-month period. The project utilises content analysis and elements of close textual analysis to examine British national newspapers and the BBC online in their coverage of the Pacific nation, aiming to determine the image that is portrayed. An interview with ABC's Papua New Guinea correspondent, Liam Fox, is also introduced to explore the reasons why the nation receives the coverage it does, and what this means for the future of international coverage.
Este documento presenta una lista de palabras en español con sus posibles traducciones o significados alternativos al inglés, incluyendo pronombres personales como "you", formas de "to be", "to know", verbos como "play" y "hurt", preposiciones como "for" y "that", conceptos gramaticales como sustantivos masculinos/femeninos, tiempos verbales como el pasado, modos como el subjuntivo e indicativo, y pronombres como "su", "her", "his", "your", "their".
The top 10 ways that spanish isn't specialJudy Hochberg
These core aspects of Spanish, which may seem peculiar to a native speaker of English, turn out to be surprisingly normal when considered in a broader linguistic context.
The West’s View on Islam/Muslims: Islamophobia?Amira Daghache
This research paper will take a deeper look at the West’s view of Islam and asks questions whether it’s all Islamophobia or something deeper. It details how it started, who’s encouraging it and why, who’s benefiting from it, how it’s viewed in other mediums, how it affected Muslims, who are the most prominent public figures fighting it and how it become different in recent years.
The document discusses media coverage of terrorism and the War on Terrorism. It provides examples of media coverage of 9/11 and the US response. On 9/11, media coverage was chaotic as events unfolded but lacked meaningful context. In subsequent days, media reported intelligence linking Al Qaeda to the attacks. When the US declared war on terrorism on September 20th, media editorials urged building allies but warned of strengthening terrorist groups through indiscriminate military action. As the US invaded Afghanistan, media initially supported the mission but cautioned the need for care in military targets and awareness of political consequences in the Islamic world.
This article was downloaded by [University of California, Ber.docxhowardh5
This document summarizes an article that explores how geospatial technologies like GIS can be used to tell the stories of Muslim women's experiences in the US after September 11, 2001. It discusses how a dominant anti-Muslim narrative portrayed all Muslims as terrorists and increased hostility and hate crimes against Muslims. While these experiences received little media attention, GIS allows integration of qualitative data to construct visual narratives that provide counterpoints to the dominant narrative and help articulate the emotional geographies of Muslim women during this period. The document uses the example of one Muslim woman from Columbus, Ohio to illustrate this approach.
The Bush era has seen remarkable change in the US foreign policy. After 9/ 11 attacks, President Bush (the son) initiated the Bush Doctrine and started his war on terror which had such implications as the invasion of Afghanistan in 2011, and the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Criminal subjects in the U.S. corporate media in the context of the "war on t...Robert Beshara
This document analyzes how criminal subjects are constructed discursively in mainstream U.S. media, specifically in the context of the "war on terror". It examines three recent events - the 2015 Charlie Hebdo shooting in Paris, the 2015 Chapel Hill shooting of three Muslim students, and the 2015 Germanwings plane crash - and how the media framed the causes and criminals differently. While the Charlie Hebdo shooting was labeled an act of "terrorism" committed by "terrorists", the other two events were portrayed as resulting from a "parking dispute" and "depression" rather than politically motivated attacks. The document argues this type of differential framing and language usage, especially the overuse of the word
This document provides an introduction and overview of the relationship between the American news media and the government in the aftermath of the September 11th attacks. It discusses how the news media largely accepted and disseminated the government's framing of the attacks and calls for military intervention without sufficient independent scrutiny or consideration of alternative viewpoints. The document traces how objectivity became an ideal of American journalism and how this limits the news media's ability to fulfill its watchdog role over the government, particularly during times of crisis when patriotism runs high. It argues the news coverage of 9/11 revealed the news media acting more as a lapdog than watchdog to the government.
Misconceptions about Islamic Religion in AmericaMehw.docxhelzerpatrina
Misconceptions about Islamic Religion in America
Mehwish Elahi
English 1A
Danielle Stokes
13 February 2020
Is Media Responsible for Rise of Islamophobia in America?
America is home to one of the most diverse Muslim inhabitants in the world. This includes people of nearly every cultural groups, country and school of thought. A significant proportion of Americans are of the opinion that Islam as a religion is incomparable with American values. Nathan Lean has stated that media plays a major role in the promotion of Islamophobia throughout the world. Reports have been observed where seven charitable foundations have spent 43 million dollars between 2001 to 2009 in order to support the spread of anti-Muslim rhetoric. Another factor was revealed which included 2010 Gallup poll win, which 43% of the Americans were, reported to feel a sense of prejudice against Muslims. Fox news has also been identified as the small component of Islamophobia in US media. Fox news has been found to retract false claims about Muslims. Various empirical evidences have been found to provide possible interactions between the latent Muslim feelings and media coverage.
However, since 2011, Muslims in the United States have been showing significant concern regarding extremism in the name of Islam across the world. Concurrently, majority are of the opinion that there is minimal support of extremism with Muslim community even though the general public differs (Spring 1,5). This has led to a rise in discernment and fear against Muslims in America. Such a social aversion and prejudice against Muslims in America has been gradually facilitating and continuing by vehement and uncivilized stereotypes exhibited in diverse forms of American media organization and political domains which instigate high level of prejudice, discrimination and exclusion of the Muslims. While some Americans believe Islamic religion promotes terrorism, this misconception is due to ignorance caused by media, but this could be solved by mandatory education about Islam in colleges.
The effect of media, chiefly mass news media as well as technology, in influencing Islamophobia has been increasing concern from the time of the 9/11 attacks. Several standpoints tend to problematize the way the media through numerous avenues related to news and film as well as nonfiction destructively depict, racialize and demonize Muslim-American identities. The impression of these edifices of Arabs and Muslims on unconstructive typecasts as well as events of marginalization amongst Muslim-American communities are apprehended in many academic domains. Considine in his study of Muslim portrayal in the United States during late 1980s and early 1990s have found that Muslims have been depicted negatively in news reporting since then. Moreover, majority of the narrations which mentioned Muslims to be intrinsically related to terrorism and war did not find sufficient evidence of more generalized negative prejudice. Howe.
IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP) e-ISSN 2278-48.docxchristiandean12115
IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAP)
e-ISSN: 2278-4861. Volume 5, Issue 2 (Nov. - Dec. 2013), PP 25-36
www.iosrjournals.org
www.iosrjournals.org 25 | Page
Binary Discourse in U.S. Presidential Speeches from FDR to Bush
II
Dr. Wassim Daghrir,
The University of Sousse, Tunisia
I. Introduction
The contemporary study of American Presidential rhetoric is of great significance. Politics is very largely the
use of language. Presidential speech and action increasingly reflect the opinion that speaking is governing. In
fact, the power of the presidency depends on its ability to persuade. The application of power is often
legitimized through rhetorical persuasion; and, in the case of American Presidents, such power, and its
associated rhetoric, becomes the fulcrum upon which many global issues turn.
Manichaeism: a Definition
The term Manichean refers in its most literal sense to a religion founded in the third century by the
Persian prophet Manes. The movement attracted large numbers of followers, who were drawn to its simplicity
and moral clarity. Its central guideline was that the entire world could be plainly divided into two opposing
spheres –God and Satan in the world of the eternal, and a corresponding dualistic battle of Good and Evil
playing out on Earth. World events were all driven by, were all the product of, an ongoing, endless conflict
between the forces of Good and the forces of Evil. One‘s moral duty was to maintain adherence to God‘s will by
siding with Good and battling against the forces of Evil.
II. Rhetorical Devices and Manipulations
At the heart of the American presidential discourse exists a coherent worldview, one several presidents
have applied with remarkable consistency and uncompromising conviction. This view holds that the global
arena can be understood as a conflict between the forces of Good and Evil, and that America is ―called upon‖ to
defend the former from the latter. By definition, this premise requires the identification of Evil, which is the
enemy –an enemy that is pure in its Evil and that, by its very nature, cannot be engaged, offered compromises,
negotiated with, understood, managed, contained, or ignored. It can only be hated, attacked, and destroyed. One
way of achieving this is by using ‗legitimizing language‘ -language that will positively represent the favored
worldview or the approved approach to global phenomenon as well as those who support this view or approach.
The use of legitimizing language is usually accompanied by the use of its counterpart, ‗delegitimizing language‘
-language which negatively depicts the opposing worldview or approach as well as those who hold these
different opinions and values. Therefore, binary conceptualizations frequently take on the form of a polarization
between a legitimized insider group (‗us‘) and a delegitimized outsider group (‗them.
Muslims in the Media: Room for Moderation?Heather Risley
This document summarizes research on media representations of Muslims. It discusses qualitative research that argues Western media often depicts Muslims and Islam negatively through stereotypes. It reviews literature on how increased engagement with the Muslim world after 9/11 has not changed public opinion, which remains skeptical of Islam. The document also summarizes quantitative content analysis studies that empirically examined news coverage, generally finding it to be more negative and focused on crises. It discusses the need for more quantitative research to test assumptions from qualitative studies.
Essay on Islam and Terrorism
Essay on Terrorism
Essay on Terrorism
Terrorism Essay
Essay on terrorism
Essay on Terrorism
Essay on History of Terrorism
Essay on Solutions for Terrorism
Essay On State Sponsored Terrorism
This document discusses definitions of terrorism from various government and international organizations. It notes that there is no universally agreed upon definition. The US Department of Defense, FBI, and Department of State each have their own definitions that focus on unlawful violence or threats of violence intended to create fear and coerce for political, religious or ideological goals. The UN and British government also have their own definitions. The document examines key elements of terrorism, such as it being a tactic to influence audiences beyond the immediate victims, and how terrorists seek publicity through violence. Experts note challenges in defining terrorism given its politically charged nature.
This document presents a case study analysis of media coverage of Faisal Shahzad, the perpetrator of a failed car bombing in Times Square in 2010. The study examines how newspapers represented Shahzad's identity as both a Pakistani immigrant and U.S. citizen. It finds that unlike previous coverage of non-Muslim attackers, newspapers frequently identified Shahzad as a U.S. citizen and emphasized his American characteristics. This reflects the emergence of a "homegrown terrorism" narrative that relies on the duality of being both homegrown and a terrorist threat hiding in plain sight. The study uses this case to explore theoretical frameworks around representations of immigrants, Muslims, and the "Other" in media.
Similar to The Enemy Within: United States news framing of the Boston bombings (13)
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptxPragencyuk
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu BiographyVoterMood
Pema Khandu, born on August 21, 1979, is an Indian politician and the Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh. He is the son of former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu. Pema Khandu assumed office as the Chief Minister in July 2016, making him one of the youngest Chief Ministers in India at that time.
The Enemy Within: United States news framing of the Boston bombings
1. Alice C Woodward
1
The Enemy Within: United States news framing of the Boston bombings
Introduction
On 15 October 2010, Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade asserted on the 9/11 attacks: “It wasn’t just
one person, it was one religion. Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are
Muslims”1
. Following the attacks on 11 September 2001, Islam has become stigmatised for
anti-Americanism and a hatred for Western values. Meanwhile, domestic terrorism from the
far-right is downplayed, and rarely acknowledged under the same label (Chermak and
Gruenewald 2006; Shane 2011). Kilmeade’s comment is indicative of a wider belief that is
promulgated in the media, which culminated in the emergence of the ‘Islamic Threat’ as the
propaganda theme of the 1990s (Ibrahim 2010:112).
On 15 April 2013, two bombs exploded at the finish line of the Boston Marathon, killing 3
people and injuring an estimated 2642
. This research will study coverage of the Boston
bombings, utilising a close textual analysis to study ten articles across six top American
newspapers and the CNN’s online news. The research aims to investigate how the framing of
the event varied from the day following the initial attacks to the day after the identities of the
suspects were revealed to the public. The study seeks to highlight assumptions about the
identity of the perpetrators, and the techniques used to portray America’s collective
victimhood.
Literature Review
The literature review will explore the main topics relevant to the study: approaches to
reporting terrorism; US news framing of terrorism; and domestic versus international
terrorism.
1
Berrier, J. 2010. Kilmeade “misspoke” about “all Muslims” being “terrorists” – twice. Media Matters for
America [Online] 18 October 2010. Available at: http://mediamatters.org/research/2010/10/18/kilmeade-
misspoke-about-all-terrorists-being-mu/172077 [Accessed: 20th
April 2013].
2
Kotz, D. 2013. Injury toll from Marathon bombs reduced to 264. The Boston Globe [Online] 24 April 2013.
Available at: http://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/2013/04/23/number-injured-marathon-
bombing-revised-downward/NRpaz5mmvGquP7KMA6XsIK/story.html [Accessed: 20th
April 2013].
2. Alice C Woodward
2
WESTERN APPROACHES TO REPORTING TERRORISM
It has been argued that the news media are a primary medium through which the public learn
about terrorism (Chermak and Gruenewald 2006; Barnett and Reynolds 2009; Spencer 2012).
How the news frames terrorism is therefore paramount in impacting public perception.
The different approaches of British and American media in their framing of terrorism have
been widely acknowledged. The inquiry into the London 7/7 bombings was treated as a
criminal investigation rather than a military affair, contrasting to America’s warlike
framework (Barnett and Reynolds 2009). Similarly, following both 9/11 and 7/7, British
news tended to focus on the dissemination of important, factual information, whereas the US
was recognised as fear-inducing (ibid).
While the September 11 attacks caused a shift in the discourse of anti-Muslim racism from a
perceived cultural threat to a security threat, the 7/7 bombings were committed by UK
citizens, characterising the concept of ‘home-grown’ terrorism, and causing a further shift
from Islam as a global to an internal threat. It was from this that the concept of ‘the enemy
within’ emerged, and the ‘War on Terror’ gained momentum.
The editor of the BBC World Update noted that “it is the style of the BBC World Service to
call no one a terrorist, aware as we are that one man’s terrorist is another one’s freedom
fighter” (cited in Barnett and Reynolds 2009:40). However, the US has traditionally
embraced the t-word, in keeping with their approach to ‘the politics of fear’ that reinforces
the War on Terror as justified (Spencer 2012). Thus, while modes of representation shift and
the framework is adjusted, “the Manichaean frame – according to which ‘we’ are ‘defending’
our right and only good way of life – is never challenged” (Schiffer 2011:213).
UNITED STATES NEWS FRAMING OF TERRORISM
Altheide (2009:xv) argued that terrorism is often conveyed as a threat in news through the
employment of simple narratives, episodic moments, and drama and fear. This results in
events like 9/11 becoming charged with meanings and emotions “that are not only culturally
discomforting but politically consequential”; for example, establishing public support for the
invasions of Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003).
3. Alice C Woodward
3
Barnett and Reynolds (2009:130) identified that American coverage of 9/11 “focused on the
symbolism of the attacks, the ability of the American people to pull together and recover, and
expressions of patriotism and support for the government and its leaders”. This was
substantiated in the strong perceptual link that metaphorised terrorism as a war, justifying a
military response (Spencer 2012:16-17). This indicates the power news holds in
commanding public consent and support for government actions.
Kitch (2003:213) studied American newsmagazines coverage following 9/11, stating that
coverage contained elements of a funeral ritual, “creating a forum for national mourning and
playing a central role in civil religion” in which “vulnerability and fear were replaced by
heroism and patriotic pride”. Thus, reporters made sense of an event they couldn’t
understand by placing it within a grand narrative of resilience and progression (ibid).
Barnett and Reynolds (2009:5) identified that “terrorism is framed differently depending on
who is covering the story, where the story takes place, who the terrorist is, and who the
victims are”. According to the U.S. Army manual, terrorism is:
The calculated use of violence or threat of violence to attain goals that are
political, religious, or ideological in nature. This is done through intimidation,
coercion, or instilling fear (TRADOC cited in Chomsky 2003:236).
However, it has been acknowledged that this definition only applies to terrorism directed at
the West, and does not carry to Western inflictions on ‘the rest’ (Chomsky 2003).
DOMESTIC ‘LONE WOLF’ VERSUS INTERNATIONAL ‘ISLAMIC’ TERRORISM
Chermak and Gruenewald (2006) examined media coverage of domestic terrorism in the US
from 1980 up to the attacks in September 2001, and found that most cases received little or
no coverage. The Southern Poverty Law Center (2012) cites a total of 99 domestic terrorist
plots, conspiracies, and racist attacks that have occurred in America since the 1995 Oklahoma
City bombing, recognising a total of 1018 active hate groups in the US. Despite the
multitude of domestic terrorist groups, Islam has been staged as the primary threat to
American freedom and values (Schiffer 2011). This re-establishes the binary of “Orient vs
Occident, East vs West, them vs us, whereby vast geographical, cultural and political
expanses are reduced to two imagined cultural regions” (Fekete 2012:40).
4. Alice C Woodward
4
Amr and Singer (2008:214) theorised that the US may be on the verge of a “clash of
civilizations” (Huntington 1998), since many Muslims believe the war on terror is essentially
a war on Islam, fuelled by the acknowledgement that a codebook of coverage seems to have
emerged which stereotypically portrays Islam, Muslims and Arabs as “backward and violent”
(Schiffer 2011:211). This racial profiling was exemplified in the Oklahoma City bombings,
as CNN reporters referred several times to two Middle Eastern men leaving the scene in a
pickup, despite the FBI’s dismissal of the rumour (Barnett and Reynolds 2009).
Shane (2011) identified that the Oslo massacre of 2011 echoed the 1995 bombings in
Oklahoma City, which targeted a federal building, calling attention to the influence of right-
wing activists and anti-Muslim websites. Anders Breivik had closely followed the debate
over Islam, lacing his manifesto with quotations from American bloggers who warned of the
Islamic threat. The good versus evil dichotomy and ‘with us or against us’ outlook
demonises and increases fear of the unknown other (Spencer 2012:19). This research aims to
establish whether the labelling of Islam as a violent anti-American religion led to
speculations regarding the identity of the perpetrators of the Boston bombings.
Methodology
In order to examine the representation of America and portrayal of the perpetrators of the
Boston marathon bombings in the US news, a critical discourse analysis was carried out on
articles in six of America’s highest circulating newspapers and CNN online. A total of ten
articles composed the data set, taken from two dates to enable a comparative study. The
following research questions were investigated:
1. How is America’s victimhood constructed?
2. How is the identity of the perpetrators constructed?
3. How is terrorism framed?
Critical discourse analysis has “sought to show that there is a systematic ideological bias to
the media that is traceable to the kind of language we find there” (Matheson 2005:5). A key
principal of discourse analysis of news is that:
5. Alice C Woodward
5
News makes sense within a social context: if it acts at all as a mirror, it reflects
preoccupations within that society, and when it constructs a picture of the world,
that picture is often very close to what members of that society already know
(ibid:15).
Thus, critical discourse analysis acts to deconstruct and interpret power relations of society,
and expose social inequalities that are formed and reproduced in such texts. The method was
therefore utilised to examine the language used to form the narrative of the bombings, and
how the two parties involved were constructed.
In order to obtain a representative image of the US news, the study incorporated six of
America’s highest circulating print newspapers3
: USA Today; New York Times; Los Angeles
Times; New York Daily News; New York Post; and San Jose Mercury News. CNN’s online
news was also studied to obtain a more representative sample across media types, since it is
one of the world’s most popular news sites. The New York Daily News and New York Post
are tabloids, while the other print publications are disseminated in broadsheet format.
LexisNexis was used to conduct a search of the above titles. ‘Boston’ and ‘bomb’ were
entered as the search criteria, firstly for the date of 16th
April 2013, the day after the
bombings, and secondly for the 20th
April 2013, the day after Dzhokhar was captured, with
the identity of the suspects having been revealed to the public. Articles were selected that
appeared on the front page or as a lead story in the papers, and the first article published on
each date on the CNN online was selected. A total of ten articles were included; five from
each day.
Studying the two dates enabled a comparative analysis of patterns of representation in the US
news, to decipher how this differed from when the initial event occurred and the identity of
the perpetrators was unknown, and after their names and origin were revealed. Matheson
identified that critical discourse analysis is often used to unveil “ideologies at the heart of the
culture to which the language belongs” (2005:5), thus facilitating a study of the framing of
the perpetrators’ identity.
3
Cision Navigator. 2011. Top 10 U.S. Daily Newspapers. Cision Navigator [Online] 16 February 2011.
Available at: http://navigator.cision.com/Top-10-US-Daily-Newspapers.aspx [Accessed: 23rd
April 2013].
Circulation figures: USA Today 1,830,594; The New York Times 876,638; Los Angeles Times 600,449; New
York Daily News 512,500; New York Post 501,501; San Jose Mercury News 477,592.
6. Alice C Woodward
6
Findings
16 April 2013
On the day following the bombings, the print news unanimously presented a harrowing
narrative of how the events unfolded, making continual references to emphasise how the
Boston Marathon, and the date, are steeped in American history. Thus, the patriotic nature of
reporting reflected coverage following the September 11 attacks, consistent with Kitch’s
(2003:213) finding that following acts of terror the media create a “forum for national
mourning”. There was also evidence of racial profiling, despite the lack of information to
back up such suppositions. These two prominent themes will be explored in more detail.
ISLAMIC CONNECTIONS
A number of articles made references that indirectly connected the bombings with Islamic
fundamentalism. An article in USA Today carried the headline ‘That post-9/11 quiet? It’s
over; As Boston news sweeps America, nation’s worst fears are reawakened’. This opening
sentiment draws a connection to the September 11 attacks, making a further twelve references
to 9/11 throughout the article. This employs readers’ knowledge schema of the tragedy,
underpinning public expectation of who is responsible by echoing a past attack committed by
Islamic terrorists.
The concept of ‘the enemy within’ seemed evident, particularly in a CNN piece which
mentioned an article published in al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula’s (AQAP) online
magazine, Inspire, titled ‘How to Make a Bomb in Your Mom’s Kitchen’, which has
purportedly “been downloaded by Islamic militants plotting terrorist attacks in both the
United States and the U.K.”. This idea that Muslims living in Western nations present a
global threat has been fuelled by the media, yet Shane (2011) has identified that “the intense
spotlight on the threat from Islamic militants has unfairly vilified Muslim Americans while
dangerously playing down the threat of attacks from other domestic radicals.” This has not
prevented news from publicising a xenophobic outlook, evident in an article in the New York
Times, which mentioned that investigators were questioning a “Saudi citizen”, who “came
under scrutiny because of his injuries, his proximity to the blasts and his nationality”. This
acknowledgement of racial profiling inherent in society is reproduced through the media,
upholding power structures and maintaining the barrier between ‘us’ and ‘them’.
7. Alice C Woodward
7
The CNN article goes on to state that al Qaeda’s formula has been “adopted” by extreme
right-wing individuals, implying that the source of the damage remains with Islamic
extremists, who have “championed ‘do-it-yourself terrorism’ […] urging Muslims in the
West to take action”. There appears a façade of objectivity to conceal the underlying belief
that this was connected to al Qaeda.
The Middle Eastern nations become inextricably fused by a hatred of the West. This
discourse of ‘othering’ propagated in the news establishes support and justification for the
invasion of Iraq and the War on Terror, which has become a common framework for
differentiating “friends” from “enemies” (Barnett and Reynolds 2009:47). The New York
Post quoted a chief of emergency services: “This is like a bomb explosion we hear about in
Baghdad or Israel or other tragic points in the world”. These “tragic points” have been
framed as such in the media, so it is the news that has propagated these negative typecasts of
foreign nations.
FRAMING AMERICAN PATRIOTISM
All of the print articles constructed America through a movie-like narrative, weaving in
historic references, sub-plots of heroic individuals, and underlining a collective identity
epitomised by these elements of shared history and suffering. Nacos (2002:3) claimed:
“never was the news about acts of terrorism as bad and dramatic as it was on September 11,
2001, and thereafter”. America’s victimhood was thus constructed in a highly emotive
manner.
A descriptive style was evident across articles illustrating what had “begun as a perfect day
[…] with blue skies and temperatures just shy of 50 degrees” (New York Times), utilising
sensory imagery to paint a picture-perfect day, juxtaposing the ensuing devastation. New
York Daily News carried the headline ‘BLOODBATH IN BOSTON’, utilising alliteration to
create a dramatic headline evocative of war. The article goes on to liken the scene to “a
warzone of screaming fans and severed limbs”, evoking images of combat. The vivid
imagery of explosions that “tore limbs from bodies, staining the street bright red” is
reminiscent of the visual framing of 9/11.
8. Alice C Woodward
8
The USA Today article states that the blasts were “felt across the nation, shaking and
sometimes shattering a fragile hope”. The metaphor of “shattering” an intangible concept
weaves a narrative more conventional of fiction, and the word “hope” carries religious
connotations, portraying America as a spiritual nation, devastated by the actions of a
perceived ‘religion of hate’. The sentence emphasises the impact of the attack on the nation
as a whole, citing a psychologist who stated: “we’re all imprinted by what happened 12 years
ago”, constructing a collective identity among all Americans, which was common across all
of the articles.
A subheading in USA Today states: ‘More than just a race’, citing a former City Council
member claiming it’s a day when families come together; a “rite of passage” for Boston’s
young people, signifying a deeper meaning behind the event. Articles stated how the
marathon “drew runners from 50 nations” (Los Angeles Times), with participants attending
for the “18th
” or “21st
” time (USA Today), marking the event as emblematic of international
integration and tradition. Thus, attacking the marathon becomes not just an isolated event,
but symbolic of an attack on American values, and a repudiation of this unity.
All of the print articles made historic references to stress the significance of Patriots Day, and
the beginning of U.S. Independence, paralleling the reporting in the wake of the September 11
attacks, in which journalists “faced a public expecting a patriotic press” (Barnett and
Reynolds 2009:9). The USA Today article referred to Boston as “the Athens of America”,
making a historical comparison to the birthplace of the Olympics. The article also cited a
political historian–in keeping with the image of the nation the media want to perpetuate–
saying “we’ve been a calm island in a sea of trouble”, implying the nation is peaceful; a
victim of surrounding evils.
Barnett and Reynolds (2009:136) summarised that the lack of political context in American
coverage of the September 11 attacks was replaced with “oversimplification of terrorist goals,
intense elements of patriotism and national pride, and perhaps most significantly, unwavering
support for government”. This appears to hold true in the immediate coverage following the
Boston bombings, with the construction of a story-like narrative, unifying the nation with
patriotic references to America’s historical significance.
9. Alice C Woodward
9
20 April 2013
The day following the arrest of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, news framing of the perpetrators shifted
from the ‘Islamic threat’ to ‘the enemy within’, as it was revealed that the brothers had grown
up in America. The brothers’ connection to Islam was publicised, however the framework
shifted to present America as facing a new danger posed by immigrants who have obtained
citizenship. The portrayal of America similarly progressed from historically significant and
patriotic to heroic and fighting to protect itself, rallying support for the government’s ‘War on
Terror’, corroborating Barnett and Reynolds (2009) assertion that following 9/11, the news
media adopted the Bush administration’s ‘War on Terrorism’ framework.
THE ENEMY WITHIN
All of the articles referred to the suspects’ ethnicity as Chechen immigrants. CNN carried the
subheading ‘Immigrant dream to American nightmare’, drawing a distinction between ‘us’
and ‘them’, and inverting the iconic concept of the American dream to denigrate foreign
immigrants. This sentiment embodies Altheide’s (2009:xv) assertion that the War on Terror
speaks to: “a new era best characterized perhaps as the global migration of dreams and
nightmares”. Immigrants take on the role as ‘nightmares’, accepted in to the land of ‘dreams’
but turning on their adoptive Western nation.
The Los Angeles Times headline states they ‘appeared alienated from the U.S. despite years in
adoptive country’, turning on American values even though the US “had embraced them as
refugees”. This personification of the American nation welcoming immigrants accentuates
the victimisation of the country, and brands refugees and immigrants as a danger, not
figuratively, to American values, but literally, to American lives.
New York Daily News stated Tsarnaev was “described by friends and family as a pot-smoking
college student who immigrated to the U.S.”. The association of smoking illegal drugs and
immigration affixes a stigma to immigrants as not understanding or valuing the American
way of life. The San Jose Mercury News described how Tamerlan “bore none of the telltales
of an immigrant” and “did not hang with anybody in the school’s Muslim circle”, implying a
feigned identity.
10. Alice C Woodward
10
The juxtaposition of the “baby-faced terror suspect” and “boys next door before going rogue”
(New York Daily News) conjure an image of a deceptive disguise, invoking the notion of ‘the
enemy within’ referred to in the previous section. The San Jose Mercury News furthered this
ideology, stating “they dressed like typical American teenagers, enjoyed playing sports and
strived to fit in”. This opening statement elicits fear in the reader, emphasising the normality
of the boys, who expressed “little sign of radicalism”, playing up the idea of Muslims living
under a façade as all-American kids. Barnett and Reynolds (2009:5) argued that the
“nationality of the terrorist […] can impact how terrorist activity is framed”. Thus, the
ideology that anyone among ‘us’ could be a terrorist, no longer confined to the identifiable
Middle Eastern stereotypes, frames terrorism in a new light, revealing ‘they look just like us’.
The New York Post stated that the brothers “were devout Muslims”, while the San Jose
Mercury Times article specified that Chechnya, the brothers’ motherland, has become “the
focal point for simmering Islamist insurgency”, reinforcing the link to Islam. Three articles
referred to one of the brothers caching videos about Russians converting to Islam, and clips
of scholars who spoke about “how the religion inspires believers and cleanses them of their
sins” (Los Angeles Times). This seems aimed to shock readers and invoke anger at the
hypocrisy of a religion which is perceived by the West to absolve mass murder, further
homogenising and demonising Islam.
AMERICAN HEROES AND EASTERN ENEMIES
The war narrative appeared across many articles, as reports referred to “Tamerlan’s last
stand”, in which “explosions lit up the night sky, and gunfire tore holes in homes” (New York
Daily News); signifying it was not just people affected, but the white picket fences of
“typically sleepy Watertown” were torn down. The personification of place characterises the
charm of American suburbia, and the destruction wrought by a foreign immigrant.
A New York Post article bore the headline ‘Terror in Boston Twisted bond of brothers
*Fugitive sib busted after manhunt* Duo had touted jihad, radical cleric’, writing about the
Islamic connection as a matter of fact rather than speculation. The ‘twisted bond of brothers’
seems a parodic play on the television war series Band of Brothers, a recurrent theme in the
article which describes how the “AK-47-toting brothers” had “fired assault rifles and lobbed
pipe bombs and a grenade at pursuing police”, creating a warlike scene.
11. Alice C Woodward
11
Contrasting to the New York Post, in which the brothers assume the role of soldiers, CNN
presented a war tale from the perspective of the police. A police chief is quoted throughout,
referring to “our police officer”, expressing a sense of camaraderie among officers, who
“tended to their wounded colleague”, adopting a ‘leave no man behind’ war mentality, while
the “couple of thousand police officers on the scene” resemble an army. The officer recalls:
“he runs out of ammunition – the bad guy”, presenting a goodies versus baddies type
narrative, typical of Western movies. However, immigrants have replaced Native Americans
as the internal threat that must be extinguished. Schiffer (2011:213) stated that “frames and
complex metaphors, such as that of the altruistic hero fighting for human rights and freedom
(as in every Western movie), can be exploited for public relations purposes”. This appeared
inverted in the articles, with the ‘freedom fighters’ staged as the police, who acted to defend
their nation.
A number of articles stated the uncertainty surrounding the motive for the attacks, echoing
Bush’s rhetorical question: ‘Why do they hate us?’ No articles mentioned a possible political
motive behind the bombings; the most transparent assumption was that it was pure Islamic
hatred. This echoed Barnett and Reynolds (2009:10) argument that suspected terrorists are
profiled, and there is a tendency to “focus on individual impact rather than looking at the
broad political context in which terrorism occurs”; evident in the many anecdotal extracts
recounting individual experiences of the day, and the impact on families.
Conclusion
Despite the usual distinction between tabloid and broadsheet newspapers in their narrative
techniques, the press seemed to adopt a standardised framework to relay the events,
abandoning their watchdog role, as in the aftermath of 9/11 (Barnett and Reynolds 2009).
Kitch asserted that “the lasting story of September 11 was not one of terror, death, and
destruction, but one of courage, redemption, and patriotic pride” (2003:222). It appears this
narrative construction was echoed following the Boston bombings in the framing of
America’s history and the heroism of its people in times of crisis.
12. Alice C Woodward
12
The dramatic narrative in reporting unites the nation; however the shift away from factual
reporting in light of such events leads to a fear-inducing form of propaganda underpinning
coverage. Spencer (2012) acknowledged that terrorism must be reported, but argued that it
could be framed in a particular way so as to alleviate the psychological effects.
The Boston Marathon bombings were a tragic occurrence, yet the media propagandising
reflected in Kilmeade’s comment: “all terrorists are Muslims” deflects attention away from
the threat of domestic terrorism from the far-right. The weaving of a war narrative may
shape public perception, amplifying the threat of international terrorism to command support
for the ‘War on Terror’, justifying the invasion of Middle Eastern countries. The depiction of
Muslims as a homogenous group denies the democratic right of equality, and the ‘enemy
within’ framework identified in the study further ostracises Muslims and immigrants so that
they become resident aliens in the United States; the East versus West binary opposition
endures.
WORD COUNT: 3,994
13. Alice C Woodward
13
Bibliography
Altheide, D.L. 2009. Terror Post-9/11 and the Media. Oxford: Peter Lang Publishing
Amr, H. and Singer, P.W. 2008. To Win the “War on Terror,” We Must First Win the “War
of Ideas”: Here’s How. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social
Science 618(1), pp.212-222
Barnett, B. and Reynolds, A. 2009. Terrorism and the Press: An Uneasy Relationship.
Oxford: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
Berrier, J. 2010. Kilmeade “misspoke” about “all Muslims” being “terrorists” – twice. Media
Matters for America [Online] 18 October 2010. Available at:
http://mediamatters.org/research/2010/10/18/kilmeade-misspoke-about-all-terrorists-
being-mu/172077 [Accessed: 20th
April 2013]
Boehlert, E. 2013. Fox News’ Ugly, Selective War on Terror: Only Acts of Violence by
Muslims, Not Far-Right Extremists, Warrant Collective Blame. Media Matters for
America [Online] 26 April 2013 Available at:
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/04/26/fox-news-ugly-selective-war-on-terror/193789
[Accessed: 28 April 2013]
Chermak, S.M. and Gruenewald, J. 2006. The Media’s Coverage of Domestic Terrorism.
Justice Quarterly 23(4), pp.428-461
Chomsky, N. 2003. Middle East Illusions. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.
Eligon, J. and Cooper, M. 2013. Blasts at Boston Marathon Kill 3 and Injure 100. The New
York Times 16 April 2013, p.1
Fekete, L. 2012. The Muslim conspiracy theory and the Oslo massacre. Race & Class 53(3),
pp.30-47
Ford, B. et al. 2013. Bloodbath in Boston: Terror bombs hit race’s finish line, killing 3. Boy,
8, among the dead – many lose limbs. New York Daily News 16 April 2013, p.2
Gray, M. 2013. Police chief: Boston manhunt began with intense firefight in dark street. CNN
online 20 April 2013
Hampson, R. and Raasch, C. 2013. That post-9/11 quiet? It’s over.; As Boston news sweeps
America, nation’s worst fears are reawakened. USA Today 16 April 2013, p.1
Honan, E. and Schwartz, L. 2013. Boston bombing suspects wanted to fit in, friends say. San
Jose Mercury News 20 April 2013
Hennessy-Fiske, M. Bengali, S. and Gold, M. 2013. The Boston Bombings Investigation;
Boston siege is over; Brothers suspected in bombing appeared alienated from the U.S.
despite years in adoptive country. Los Angeles Times 20 April 2013, p.1
14. Alice C Woodward
14
Huntington, S. 1998. The clash of civilisations and the remaking of world order. New York:
Simon & Schuster
Ibrahim, D. 2010. The Framing of Islam on Network News Following the September 11th
Attacks. The International Communication Gazette 71(1), pp.111-125
Kitch, C. 2003. “Mourning in America”: ritual, redemption, and recovery in news narrative
after September 11. Journalism Studies 4(2), pp.213-224
Kotz, D. 2013. Injury toll from Marathon bombs reduced to 264. The Boston Globe [Online]
24 April 2013. Available at: http://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/health-
wellness/2013/04/23/number-injured-marathon-bombing-revised-
downward/NRpaz5mmvGquP7KMA6XsIK/story.html [Accessed: 20th
April 2013]
Lister, T. and Cruickshank, P. 2013. Boston Marathon bombs have hallmarks of ‘lone wolf’
devices, experts say. CNN online 16 April 2013
Matheson, D. 2005. Media Discourses: Analysing Media Texts. Maidenhead: Open
University Press
Morales, M. et al. 2013. Cops Seize 2nd Killer 1 fiend busted in boat Bro gunned down on
day of Mayhem. New York Daily News 20 April 2013, p.2
Rosario, F. Celona, L. and Mangan, D. 2013. Terror in Boston Twisted bond of brothers
*Fugitive sib busted after manhunt* Duo had touted jihad, radical cleric. The New York
Post 20 April 2013, p.2
Schiffer, S. 2011. Demonizing Islam before and after 9/11: Anti-Islamic spin – an important
factor in pro-war PR? Global Media and Communication 7(3), pp.211-214
Semuels, A. Tangel, A. and Serrano, R.A. 2013. Boston Marathon Explosions; Terror in
Boston; At least 3 killed, 140 hurt in twin bombings near marathon finish line; No
threat had been suspected. Los Angeles Times 16 April 2013, p.1
Shane, S. 2011. Killings in Norway Spotlight Anti-Muslim Thought in U.S. The New York
Times 24 July 2011
Southern Poverty Law Center. 2012. Terror From the Right: Plots, Conspiracies and Racist
Rampages Since Oklahoma City. Montgomery, Alabama: Southern Poverty Law Center
Spencer, A. 2012. Lessons Learnt: Terrorism and the Media. Swindon, Wiltshire: Arts and
Humanities Research Council