this data shows a statistical result between the performance of student who manage their time wisely and those who do not manage their time properly

1. The Effect of Time Management
on academic performances
JOHN MYLES DANQUAH

2. INTRODUCTION
• According to Wasan (2017) time management is a vital role which
helps improve upon students academic performances. This is because
any student would be able to acheieve academic excellent if they
spend time studying. Therefore the purpose of the research is to
understand how the way a student spends his/her time has a great
influence on the performance academically.

3. Hypothesis
HO Time management affect academic performance
H1 Time management does not affect academic performance

4. Methods
• My research included a sample of 24 participant who were students
of various university in Vilnius. And the participant included 13 males
and 11 females. Also I had 2 age groups ranging from 19-25 and 26
above.
• Moreover, I used an online questionnaire using google forum to
collect my data. Also I used the likert scale to measure my data.

5. Descriptives
Gender Age Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
N 24 24 24 24 24 24 24
Mean 2.88 1.75 2.33 2.38 1.50
Median 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Mode 2.00 ᵃ 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Sum 69 42 56 57 36
Standar
d
deviatio
n
1.23 1.26 0.761 1.06 1.06
Minimu
m
1 1 1 1 1
Maximu
m
5 5 4 5 5
ᵃ More than one mode exists, only the first is reported
Results
Descriptives 1.Strongly Agree
2.Agree
3.Neutral
4.Disagree
5.Strongly
Disagree

6. Group Descriptives
Group N Mean Median SD SE
Q1
Fem
ale
11 3.09 3.00 1.30
0.39
2
Mal
e
13 2.69 3.00
1.18
2
0.32
8
Q2
Fem
ale
11 1.73 1.00 1.19
0.35
9
Mal
e
13 1.77 1.00
1.36
3
0.37
8
Q4
Fem
ale
11 2.36 2.00 1.03
0.31
0
Mal
e
13 2.38 2.00
1.12
1
0.31
1
Q5
Fem
ale
11 1.91 1.00 1.38
0.41
5
Mal
13 1.15 1.00
0.55 0.15
Results
Independent Samples T-Test
Where
Q1- I manage my time daily by listing
the things I have to do daily
Q2-I see positive changes in my
academic performance when I plan my
time well

7. Independent Samples T-Test
Statistic df p
Q1 Student's t 0.7864 22.0 0.440
Mann-
Whitney U
59.0 0.474
Q2 Student's t -0.0795 22.0 0.937
Mann-
Whitney U
65.5 0.712
Q4 Student's t -0.0475 22.0 0.963
Mann-
Whitney U
70.5 0.975
Q5 Student's t 1.8188 ᵃ 22.0 0.083
Mann-
Whitney U
45.0 0.047
Note. Hₐ μ Female ≠ μ Male
ᵃ Levene's test is significant (p < .05), suggesting a violation of the assumption of equal variances

8. Binomial Test
Level Count Total Proportion p
MT 1 10 10 1.000 0.002
MMT 1 7 7 1.000 0.016
Note. Hₐ is proportion ≠ 0.5
Where MT represent the participant who managed their time
Whiles MMT represent the participant that mismanaged their time

9. Conclusion
• We can how students who are able to plan and use their time wisely
have a higher chance of performing academically better than
students who do not manage their time properly.