The document argues against the compatibility of theistic evolution with biblical scripture, asserting that evolutionary principles contradict key biblical tenets such as the creation timeline, the nature of death, and the origin of Adam and Eve. It emphasizes that the days of creation in Genesis are literal 24-hour periods and contests that death existed before sin as stated in biblical teachings. The document claims that accepting evolution undermines the authority of scripture and poses challenges to the interpretation of Christian beliefs.

1. The Bible and Evolution
Are they compatible?

2. Present logical and intellectual evidence for a
biblical faith, in terms that are easy to understand
 Theistic Evolution is not biblical
1. 24 Days
2. Death before sin
3. No meat eaters
4. Bloodshed NOT GOOD
5. Creation of Adam & Eve
6. Testimony of Jesus
7. God would have said it
8. Re-writing scripture
 Evolution is scientifically
impossible
 It does not stand the test of
scientific scrutiny
1. Does not pass test of scientific
law, Laws of Thermodynamics
2. Does not pass test of
mathematical possibility
3. Does not have evidence from
fossil record

3. Define Vocabulary
 Evolution: The common descent of all life on earth from a single
ancestor via undirected mutation and natural selection (textbook Def
Neodarwinism)
 Theistic Evolution: Belief that God used the process of Evolution, that
the Earth is billions of years old, that evolution is true and that God
guided this process.
 The Days of Creation in Genesis were not literal 24 hour days, but long eons
of time
 Life began in the oceans, gradually evolved into living creatures, that evolved
into different species resulting in Adam and Eve

4. Theistic Evolution
Not compatible with the Bible

5. #1 The Bible’s Description of a Day
 Days recorded in Genesis are not long eons of time
 They refer to only a 24 hour period
 “And there was evening, and there was morning, the first day”
 “And there was evening and there was morning, the second day”
 Hebrew word used for day in Genesis is: yowm
 When used in combination with a number, like first or second; it
means Yowm can only be interpreted as a literal 24 hour period

6. The Bible’s Description of a Day
 If God created through long spans of time, other words in Hebrew would
have conveyed it
 Yamin, alone or with evening and morning, would’ve meant it was ‘days’ of
evening and morning
 Kadem, ‘and it was form days of old’
 Olam, with days ‘and it was days of old’
 If God intended to communicate long periods of time, the words existed to
convey that message, but God didn’t use those words
 Dor, ‘and it was generations’ of days and night
 Tamid, with days and nights or evening and morning, ‘and it was the
continuation’ of days
 Yam-Rob, a long day

7. The Bible
 Romans 5:12 ‘Therefore, just as sin
entered the world through one
man, and death through sin, and in
this way death came to all people,
because all sinned—
 Death entered the world through sin
 When did sin enter the world? The
Garden of Eden
 At that point death came into the
world
Theistic Evolution
 If Theistic Evolution is true, death
would have been going on for
millions and millions of years
through the evolutionary process:
 survival of the fittest
 Animals eating each other as part
of a food chain
 Death would have been happening
for millions of years before Adam
and Eve sinned in the garden of
Eden.
#2 Death Before Sin

8. Death Before Sin? “The wolf will live with the lamb, the
leopard will lie down with the goat,
the calf and the lion and the yearling
together; and a little child will lead
them. The cow will feed with the
bear, their young will lie down
together, and the lion will eat straw
like the ox.”
“The wolf and the lamb will feed
together, and the lion will eat straw
like the ox, and dust will be the
serpent’s food. They will neither harm
nor destroy on all my holy mountain,”
says the LORD.”
Isaiah 11:6-7
When Christ returns to the
earth and sets up the Kingdom
of God
Specifically told animals will
not be eating each other
Isaiah 65:25
Vision of world without sin
Total harmony in nature
If you believe that God used
Evolution, how do you explain
death occurring for millions of
years on this planet before sin?

9. #3 No Meat Eaters
 The diet in Genesis 1 for both humans and animals was plants
 Genesis 1:29-30
 Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the
face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed
in it. They will be yours for food. And to all the beasts of the
earth and all the birds in the sky and all the creatures that
move along the ground—everything that has the breath of
life in it—I give every green plant for food.” And it was so.
 Reflects the ideal world vision in Isaiah
 Animals are not part of the food chain

10. The Bible
Day 6 of Creation,
animals are not allowed
to eat other animals
Theistic Evolution
 If theistic evolution is true,
then Genesis chapter 1 is
wrong
 Animals have been eating
each other for millions of
years
No Meat Eaters?

11. #4 Death and
Bloodshed Good?
 Genesis 1:20-21 (Day 5) And God said, “Let the
water teem with living creatures, and let birds
fly above the earth across the vault of the sky.”
So God created the great creatures of the sea
and every living thing with which the water
teems and that moves about in it, according to
their kinds, and every winged bird according to
its kind. And God saw that it was good.
 Genesis 1:24-25 (Day 6) And God said, “Let the
land produce living creatures according to their
kinds: the livestock, the creatures that move
along the ground, and the wild animals, each
according to its kind.” And it was so. God made
the wild animals according to their kinds, the
livestock according to their kinds, and all the
creatures that move along the ground
according to their kinds. And God saw that it
was good.
 31 God saw all that he had made, and it was
very good. And there was evening, and there
was morning—the sixth day.
Painful, brutal process of
death and bloodshed…would
be considered ‘good’ to God
Birds and fish eating each
other for millions of years
God would look at that and
say that it was good?
Would God think that in light
of what we saw in Isaiah 65?
Isaiah: no sin, animals not
eating each other complete
harmony in nature, no
bloodshed

12. The Bible
 Genesis 1:24-25 (Day 6) And God said,
“Let the land produce living creatures
according to their kinds: the livestock,
the creatures that move along the
ground, and the wild animals, each
according to its kind.” And it was so.
God made the wild animals according
to their kinds, the livestock according
to their kinds, and all the creatures
that move along the ground according
to their kinds. And God saw that it
was good.
 Animals created as they were, and
reproduced only their kind (species)
 (Gen 1:11-12 plants)
Theistic Evolution
 Evolution teaches animals
evolved into different kinds of
animals
 Didn’t reproduce according to
their kind
 Evolved into higher forms of life,
into more complex, different
kinds (species) completely
 A rabbit producing a chicken is
not reproducing after it’s own
kind
#5 Reproducing According to Their own Kinds

17. Cavemen and Neanderthals?
 Caveman = Hollywood creation
 Neanderthal skull? Looks different then human skull today, Thicker brown ridge and
longer cranium
 Dr Jack Cuozzo, www.jackcuozzo.com Uses Cephalometric Radio Graph to
extrapolate what jaw will look like in future years of age based on pictures 6 months
apart
 Human skulls continue to change shape as we get older, cranium gets longer and
brow ridge gets thicker, especially for people who eat a lot of meat (eat meat puts
pressure above eyes)
 Took images of 20 to 80 year old skull, to develop known growth pattern of human
skull, what would it look like after several hundred years?
 Is it not possible, ‘Neanderthal’ skulls proof people used to live for hundred of years
as bible says?
 People had unique look, just not around today (dwarves)

18. Ape/Human or Just Human?

19. Transitional fossils are the remains of those creatures
which should be found ‘in-between’ one kind of creature
and another kind. For example, evolutionists have long
sought the ‘missing link’ between ape and human—some
sort of half human/half ape intermediate form. None has
ever been found, though many candidates have come and
gone. Amplified, no doubt, by the lure of prestige, fame
and fortune, the desire to discover such a fossil has led
some even to fabricate evidence, such as with the famous
Piltdown Man hoax. In that case, though the perpetrator
has never been definitively identified, a human skull was
‘planted’ with an ape’s jaw which was crudely ‘doctored’.
The result fooled the world for decades into thinking this
was proof of human evolution.

20. #6 Creation of Adam and Eve
 Theistic Evolution teaches man, Homo Sapiens, evolved great Apes
called Hominids.
 Adam was part of an evolutionary chain
 Eventually Adam was produced, born from part Hominid, part human
parents.
 Adam would have evolved in the womb through genetic mutation in
his part human, part hominid mother.
 He would have been a little bit different from his parents
 When he matured God placed him into the Garden of Eden.

21. Creation of Adam and Eve
 ‘Theistic evolution typically postulates a point at which a population
of hominids who had (or may have) evolved by a process of natural
evolution acquired souls and thus (with their descendants) became
fully human in theological terms.’ Wikipedia.org

22. Adam
 Genesis 2:7 “Then the LORD God formed a manfrom the dust of
the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and
the man became a living being.”
 The bible is very clear, so which is it?
 Was Adam created by God from the dust of the ground? Or was
Adam created as a fertilised egg in the womb of his part hominid,
part human mother?
 At what point did God breathe into Adam’s nostrils? Was he not
alive before he was born?
 Why would God tell Moses that he formed Adam from the dust of
the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breathe of life, if he in
fact developed in the womb and went through the birth process as
we know it today?

23. Eve
 Genesis 2:21-23 “So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a
deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s
ribs and then closed up the place with flesh. Then the LORD God
made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he
brought her to the man. The man said, “This is now bone of my
bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called ‘woman,’ for she
was taken out of man.”
 If TE is true, Eve was part of an evolutionary chain, would have
been born from part human, part Ape/Hominid parents same as
Adam
 Can that be reconciled to Genesis 2?
 Theistic Evolution teaches that Eve did not come from Adams side

24. Eve
 1 Corinthians 11:8 “For man did not come from woman, but woman
from man” Apostle Paul.
 If Theistic Evolution is true, Eve came from women (her mother, a part
monkey)
 Does this mean that Paul just didn’t understand Darwinian
Evolution/Science?

25. Side Note, Creation of the Animals
 Genesis 2:19 “Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all
the wild animals and all the birds in the sky.”
 Theistic Evolution teaches that life began in the oceans billions of
years ago
 How is it that God started life in the oceans, then turns around and
tells Moses that he started life from the dust of the ground?

26. #6 The Testimony of
Jesus Regarding
Creation
 Theistic Evolution teaches each of the
days of creation were actually long eons
of time, they spanned millions and
millions of years
 Adam and eve came along at the very
end of the evolutionary process, they
came at the end of day six
 So through millions, and billions of years
of creation, Adam and eve came along at
the very end of all of the creative
process
 If TE is true, God created the universe 15
billion years ago
 Adam and eve evolved just about 30 to
40 000 years ago, that is at the very END
of creation
Mark 10:6 “But at the beginning of
creation God ‘made them male
and female’. For this reason a man
will leave his father and mother
and be united to his wife and the
two will become one flesh.’
Did Jesus just not quite understand
science? Did Jesus not have the
capacity to understand Darwinian
Evolution?
99.9998% through all of creation is
when Adam and Eve came along,
but Jesus says at the beginning

27. #7 God Would Have Just Stated it
 If God truly used evolution to create, why didn’t he just tell that to
Moses?
 Moses would have believed him, Moses would not have been
offended in the slightest
 Moses would not have thought anything negative about that at all
 Today we would consider Evolution to be a Godly thing
 Fact is, God told Moses that he didn’t use evolution. He told Moses
that he created things as they were, after their own kind

28. God Would Have Stated It
 It would have been simple for God to tell Moses that he used
Evolution
 ‘Well, Moses wasn’t a scientist’
 God would not have to explain the science of Evolution, He
would just convey the basic concepts

29. God Would Have Stated It
 Creation of the sun
 God didn’t go into all the intricate scientific details explaining
the sun
 ‘I set a great light in the expanse of the sky’
 God could have simplified the Evolutionary process to Moses
just the same

30. God Would Have Stated It
“I created life in the oceans too small to see, and over a
long time they grew larger and more detailed until they
became man, and woman, and all the plants and animals
of the earth, and it was good.”
Why didn’t God just tell that to Moses?
Problem is, that’s not what God told Moses
Why would God have worded creation the way that He
did in Genesis when he could have easily worded it
another way that would have been more truthful?

31. #8 Waters Down the Authority of Scripture
 Big problem, big concern with Theistic Evolution
 “What’s the big deal if I choose to believe God used
Evolution? Why does it matter? So what?”
 One of the biggest battles bible believers face today is re-
writing of scripture
 People don’t want to believe what the bible actually says

32. Waters Down Scriptural Authority
 John 14:6 “Jesus answered, ‘I am the way and the truth and the life.
No one comes to the Father except through me.’
 Today, ‘all paths lead to God’ ‘All religions lead to God’
 We are seeing Jesus being re-written/re-defined before our very eyes
 People are believing what they want to believe
 Believe in Jesus = fan of Jesus, nice guy

33. Waters Down the Authority of Scripture
 People are buying into the argument that Evolution is
scientifically true
 Since they believe the dominantly atheistic scientific
community that says there is not God, Darwinian Evolution is
what happened, and here is the supposed evidence
 Since Christians are believing that there is scientific evidence
for Evolution (succumbing to pressure and propaganda) they
are assuming that the bible must be interpreted incorrectly
 Twisting the bible to fit what they think science has taught
them is true

34. The Bible
 Adam came from dust of the
ground
 Eve came from the dust of the
ground and Adam’s rib
 Animals were created from the
dust of the ground
 Death entered the world
through Adam sin
Theistic Evolution
 Adam and Eve came from part
hominid (Ape), part human
parents
 Animals evolved from Amoeba's
in the oceans
 Death was happening for
millions of years before sin
But we’re really supposed to interpret that to
mean…

35. The Bible
 Animals did not kill and eat each
other until after Adam’s sin
 Adam became a living being when
God breathed into his nostrils
 Jesus said that Adam and Eve were
made at the beginning of creation
Theistic Evolution
 Animals DID kill and eat each other
for millions of year before Adam
 Adam was already a living being in
his mother’s womb before he had
nostrils
 Adam and Eve were actually born
billions of years after creation
But we’re really supposed to interpret that to
mean…

36. Why Trust any Scripture?
 If that’s how were really supposed to interpret the creation record of
scripture, then why trust anything scripture says?
 Well sure, the bible says that Jesus walked on water, but what does that
really mean? How should we really interpret that?
 Yeah, the bible says that Jesus rose from the dead, but who knows what
that really means?
 If you can twist the interpretation of the creation accounts to believe in
Theistic Evolution, you can do the very same thing about anything in
scripture
 Give yourself that license, to take anything in scripture that you don’t like,
anything you don’t agree with: ‘Well I’m sure that’s just supposed to be
interpreted a different way’

37. It’s Either/Or
 Adam either came from the dust of the ground, or a part monkey mother
 Eve either came from Adam’s rib, or she came from a half monkey mother
 Women either came from Man, as Apostle Paul said, or woman came from
her mom
 Animals either did not kill and eat each other and die before sin, or they
did kill and eat and die before sin
 Etc, etc, etc
 You cannot have both, you cannot have it both ways…There is no way to
reconcile Theistic Evolution with scripture

38. Why has Theistic Evolution
become Prevalent Today?
Many of evolutions top supporters have switched from defending evolution, to
attacking religion
Richard Dawkins is the best example of this…

39. Evolution is Scientifically
Impossible
It does not stand the test of scientific, mathematical or archaeological scrutiny

40. #1 The Laws of Thermodynamics
 1st law of Thermodynamics: a conservation of energy law, in the
universe everything is made up of matter and energy.
 The matter can convert into energy, the energy can convert into
matter, everything in the Universe is made of matter and energy
 However much matter and energy there is, there can never be more,
and there can never be less
 You cannot create something out of nothing, you cannot go from
nothing to suddenly the creation of matter and energy.
 Scientific law just like the law of gravity

41. 1st Law of Thermodynamics
 How did we go from nothing in the universe to something in the universe?
 where did everything come from? Where did all the stuff come from?
 How do we have a violation of the first law of thermodynamics by the
creation of matter and energy in the closed system of the universe?
 No scientific explanation…
 Being called God, who operated outside of physical law, and has ability to
violate laws of physics, has the ability to create something out of nothing
 Scientific conclusion there must be a God who created everything because
there is no scientific model without him that allows matter and energy to
be created from nothing

42. 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
 Everything in a closed system will tend toward a state of equilibrium
 Entropy: things will tend to decay, degrade, go from order to chaos
 Key principle, things will not increase in complexity and design, they
will decrease, break down, physical law.

43. Violation of Laws of
Thermodynamics
Evolution: big bang explosion 15 billion
years ago, complexity and design started to
develop on its own, then life developed on
its own, and that life grew in more
complexity, more design, and more order
Violates the second law of thermodynamics
We get radiation from the sun (random)
We get hit by asteroids (random) = increase
entropy, increase degradation process
Evolution: supposed to believe everything
has gone opposite to the laws of
thermodynamics
Laws violated all through history until today
we don’t see it violated any more…not
logical

44. Wisdom from Richard Dawkins

45. Evolution, How Did Life Begin?

46. #2 Mathematical Probability of Life Developing
Over Time
 Time + chance means anything is possible (very slow process)
 Evolution: Life started developing about 3 billion years ago
 Is that enough time?
 Rather then giving 3 billion years, really generous multiply
that by 10, 30 billion years
 The simplest protein molecule has 400 linked amino acids in a
very distinct order
 Is 30 billion years enough time to solve the puzzle of the
simplest protein molecule?

47. Not Mathematically Possible
 Simplify it even further…
 Picture simple 100 piece puzzle
 100 arranged in a specific sequence, how many different combination
options are possible?
 Use a factorial (100 x 99x 98 x 97, etc)
 Total number of different combinations options available?
 10 to the 158th power…1 with 158 zeroes behind it, there are not that
many atoms on the earth!
 “If I have 15 billion or 30 billion years that’s enough time to eventually
stumble upon the right sequence, right?”

48. Not Mathematically Possible
 Is it really?
 Do you know that 30 billion years only has 10 to the 18th power
number of seconds in it.
 Divide 10 to the 158th power (# of combination options) by 10 to the
18th power (# seconds there are in 30 billion years)
 = 10 to the 140th power
 10 to the 140th power combination changes that would have to take
place, every second on the second for 30 billions years to randomly
get the right combination!

49. Not Mathematically Possible
 Keep in mind, the simplest protein molecule has 400 linked
amino acids in a very distinct order
 I don’t see how 30 billion years is enough time mathematically
for life to evolve…let alone 3 billion years
 The evolutionists still have to explain how life came into
existence from non-living matter
 Something evolutionists believe in but there’s no scientific
basis for it at all.

51. #3 The Fossil Record: No ‘Transition’ Fossils
 Evolution teaches that everything we see today evolved from a common
ancestor
 One type of animal that slowly progressive steps evolved into a different
animal
 Lets say a rat evolved into a bat…
 Predictions; science, forming a hypothesis…If Evolution is true, we should
be able to find in the ground a few bones of rats, a few bones of bats, but
the overwhelming majority of fossils should be the long series of
evolutionary transition
 However if creation I true, I predict what we should find are bones of rats,
bones of bats, and no transitionary fossils in-between

52. No Transition Fossils
 Guess what we find in the ground? Fossils of all animals in their
completed form, but no transitional fossils in-between
 Logic demands that these animals were created as we see them
 There will be claims of transition fossils…nothing more then a deformity,
we see all the time cows with six legs, animals with two heads, etc
 There is no logical reason for me to conclude that the cow is evolving
from a spider
 We look around the world today, see a very small percentage of animals
that are deformed, so we should be able to predict that in the fossil
record the vast majority of fossils will be wholly formed, and a very small
percentage of fossils of animals with a deformity...that is exactly what we
find

53. Deformities
 2003, baby born in India with a 6 inch tail
 Is anyone going to believe that these people are the last remnants of
evolution from a cat or a dog or an animal with a tail?
 2005, the Mermaid Baby, Lima Peru, legs fused together
 No evolutionist is going to claim that the baby is a link between a
fish to a human
 BUT what if that baby was born a thousands of years ago?
 The cyclops kitty, 2006..would anyone claim this was evolution
happening?
 If that very same fossil were born today, everyone would understand
its just a deformity, so why isn't it just a deformity when it was born
that way back then?

54. Fossils of Unique Extinct Animals
 2006 fish like creature, stubby lobe fins
 Might be strong enough to allow the fish to drag itself along the
ground or along shallow water
 Claim this is proof of Evolution, where fish started to evolve and
develop legs, setting stage for them to come out of the water and
crawl along the ground, 375 million years ago
 What if Tiktaalik was nothing more then a regular kind of fish that
went extinct a couple of hundred years ago?
 Isn't it possible its nothing more than a fish that had stubby fins that
allowed it to move along the sand in shallow water?

55. ‘Living Fossils’
 Coelacanth, same stubby lobed fins
 390 million to 70 million years ago dated fossils
 1938, a fisherman caught a life Selicanth
 Selicanth today look identical to fossils of Selicanth that supposedly died
out 70 million years ago and were proof of fish evolving into land creatures
(same time prediction as dinosaurs)
 Find the bones of an extinct animal, since its unique to anything alive today
claim it’s a transition fossil
 So now it’s a ‘Living Fossil’ (oxymoron)
 Why isn't this just evidence that they were wrong?
 Think about the Penguin? Or Platypus?

56. The Dating Methods Just Don’t Work
 Carbon Dating; when something dies it releases Carbon (C14), it has less and
less and less Carbon in it over time (5730 years, half life)
 Willard Libby (1949 Nobel Prize) developed/invented Carbon dating,
documented that after about 50 000 years all the Carbon is gone
 Assumes constant rate of decay, closed system, known amount of Carbon in
the organism.
 A fresh seal skin was carbon dated to be 1300 years old (www.drdino.com)
 A living mollusk was dated to be 2300 years old (www.drdino.com)
 What about Uranium238, Potassium40? (Half life’s of more than million
years)
 Unfortuntely these elements don’t exist in dinosaur bones themselves, nor in
the sedimentary rock around them – Go looking for igneous rock nearby

57. So How do They Date a Bone?
 Most common way of dating a bone: Date the rocks around them, look at
the layer on the Geological chart: uniformitarianism
 Nowhere on earth see example of the layers as they are on the chart
(man made invention/ideal on paper)…instead all mixed up, layers look
more like shuffled deck of cards
 Bottom of Grand Canyon is lava bed dated 1.1 billion years old, the lava
bed at the top dated to 2.6 billion years old…upside down? Layers not
uniform.
 Take a bone, look for neighboring igneous rock, send press release saying
bone is 85 million years old…Did they actually date the bone? No
 Lava: Potassium will decay into Argon…look down for lava bed, date the
rock (5 million years old) anything else in this same layer of ground were
also going to say is 5 million years old.

60. Dating Rocks?
 Mt Saint Helens, erupted in 1980’s (Washington State)
 1990’s Creation scientists took 5 chunks of igneious rock and sent it to
Geochron Labratories at Stanford University to be dated
 340 000, 350 000, 900 000, 1.7 mill, 2.8 million years old (all less then 10
years old)
 11 samples from volcano in New Zealand (about 40 years old); Hundreds of
thousands of years to 3.5 million years old
 Volcano in Hawaii, eruption from 1800’s, about 200 years old dated up to
1.41 billion years old
 Never has a piece of igneous rock or any rock been dated to the correct age
when we know the age

62. Stephen J Gould, Evolutionary
Scientist, Professor of Geology
and Palentology at Harvard
University
“The absence of fossil evidence
for intermediary stages between
major transitions and organic
design, indeed our inability even
in our imagination, to construct
functional intermediates, in so
many cases has been a persistent
and nagging problem for
gradualist accounts of evolution
Harvard University Paleo-Biology
Journal, Page 127, January 1st
1980.

63. Do All Scientists Believe in Evolution?
 Real scientists with real credentials who believe in creation: rattle off some
names that believe Evolution is false (notice different disciplines)
 Dwayne Gish PHD biochemistry, John Morse PHD Geological Engineering,
Ken Cumming PHD in Biology (Harvard), John Bumgardener PHD
Geophysics space physics (UCLA), Robert Gentry Nuclear Physicist, Steve
Austin PHD Geology, David DeWitt PHD Neuroscience, Larry Vartimun PHD
Atmospheric Science, Jay While PHD Nuclear Chemistry, Russel Humphries
PHD Physics, David Phillips PHD Paleantology, Burt Thompson PHD
Microbiology, David Mentum PHD Cell Biology, Danny Faulner PHD
Astronomy and Astrophysics, Alexander Molonov PHD Geology, Kurt Weiss
PHD Paleontology (Harvard)

64. Test?
 Mona Lisa, are you open to the possibility that
that painting came together on its own from
random energy and action?
 It’s too complex (logical)
 What's more complex, that two dimensional
painting or the three dimensional person
looking at you in the mirror?