Department of Transportation Fiscal Year 2012 Budget HighlightsPorts-To-Plains Blog
The President’s FY 2012 budget request includes a total of $129 billion for the
Department of Transportation. A key element of this request is the inclusion of a $556 billion six-year surface transportation reauthorization proposal to improve the
Country’s highways, transit, and rail infrastructure and to ensure that these systems
are safe.
Managing California's Incremental Intercity Passenger Rail HSIPR in Support of the CHSR project. A survey of Caltrain Intercity rail corridor HSIPR and their 2025 Electrification Plan for Supporting CHSR Connectivity.
Failure to Act: The economic impact of current Investment Trends in surface ...Ports-To-Plains Blog
This report seeks to provide an objective analysis of the economic implications of the United States’ continued underinvestment in infrastructure. The Report Card for America’s Infrastructure, published every four years by the American Society of Civil Engineers, grades the current state of 15 national infrastructure categories on a scale from A through D for gradations of excellent to poor, and F for failing. This report answers the question “So what?” In terms of economic performance, what does a D mean? What does an F mean?
Department of Transportation Fiscal Year 2012 Budget HighlightsPorts-To-Plains Blog
The President’s FY 2012 budget request includes a total of $129 billion for the
Department of Transportation. A key element of this request is the inclusion of a $556 billion six-year surface transportation reauthorization proposal to improve the
Country’s highways, transit, and rail infrastructure and to ensure that these systems
are safe.
Managing California's Incremental Intercity Passenger Rail HSIPR in Support of the CHSR project. A survey of Caltrain Intercity rail corridor HSIPR and their 2025 Electrification Plan for Supporting CHSR Connectivity.
Failure to Act: The economic impact of current Investment Trends in surface ...Ports-To-Plains Blog
This report seeks to provide an objective analysis of the economic implications of the United States’ continued underinvestment in infrastructure. The Report Card for America’s Infrastructure, published every four years by the American Society of Civil Engineers, grades the current state of 15 national infrastructure categories on a scale from A through D for gradations of excellent to poor, and F for failing. This report answers the question “So what?” In terms of economic performance, what does a D mean? What does an F mean?
Carolyn Flowers, executive director and CEO of the Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS), updates attendees at the 2011 Charlotte Chamber Transportation Summit.
Presentation by Kevin Page, Chief Operating Officer, Rail and Public Transportation, to the Jan. 9 meeting of the Virginia-North Carolina High Speed Compact
First of three presentations done for Public Relations course. Presentation served to introduce company that group would be representing for the semester.
Carolyn Flowers, executive director and CEO of the Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS), updates attendees at the 2011 Charlotte Chamber Transportation Summit.
Presentation by Kevin Page, Chief Operating Officer, Rail and Public Transportation, to the Jan. 9 meeting of the Virginia-North Carolina High Speed Compact
First of three presentations done for Public Relations course. Presentation served to introduce company that group would be representing for the semester.
How to Improve Amtrak - America's Railroaddurangokid123
This is a small presentation about how to improve the government operated, for profit company Amtrak. Amtrak is our nation's passenger rail provider and has been in operation since 1970.
A graph is a data structure composed of vertices/dots and edges/lines. A graph database is a software system used to persist and process graphs. The common conception in today's database community is that there is a tradeoff between the scale of data and the complexity/interlinking of data. To challenge this understanding, Aurelius has developed Titan under the liberal Apache 2 license. Titan supports both the size of modern data and the modeling power of graphs to usher in the era of Big Graph Data. Novel techniques in edge compression, data layout, and vertex-centric indices that exploit significant orders are used to facilitate the representation and processing of a single atomic graph structure across a multi-machine cluster. To ensure ease of adoption by the graph community, Titan natively implements the TinkerPop 2 Blueprints API. This presentation will review the graph landscape, Titan's techniques for scale by distribution, and a collection of satellite graph technologies to be released by Aurelius in the coming summer months of 2012.
As New Federal Fiscal Year Begins, the Clock
Ticks Toward Another Highway Trust Fund Crisis
Coalition Officials Continue Focus on
Transportation Funding, Long-Term Legislation
Final Project RubricCriteria Exceeds Standards Meets Standar.docxvoversbyobersby
Final Project Rubric
Criteria
Exceeds Standards
Meets Standards
Developing
Points
Project Naming, Organization, and Submission
Project named correctly, subdirectories are used to organize the files associated with the project, and project submitted per instructions.
Project not named as requested, files not organized in subdirectories effectively, or project not submitted per instructions.
5
Site Hierarchy
All required pages are located correctly according to hierarchical structure given.
Some required pages are not located correctly according to hierarchical structure given.
5
Color Palate and Fonts
Color scheme and font styles represent the conservative company scenario, are consistently applied, and not under or over used
Color scheme and/or font styles do not represent the conservative company scenario and/or include too much or too little variation
10
Graphics
Graphics are included and are appropriately and consistently formatted, sized and implemented. Branding is present and consistent across the site.
Graphics are included, but are inappropriately and/or inconsistently formatted, sized and implemented. Branding is not consistently across site.
10
Navigation Functionality
All navigational links work as expected.
One or more navigational link is coded incorrectly.
10
Main Page
CSS used extensively to professionally style site. Advanced understanding of various types of selector rules and more advanced CSS properties.
Includes content, functionality, navigational components, branding and footer information requested; internal documentation included; titled appropriately.
Files validate per HTML5 and CSS standards.
CSS used extensively to professionally style the site. A clear understanding of best practices in the formation of rules is demonstrated.
Includes requested content, functionality, navigational components, branding and footer information requested; internal documentation included; titled appropriately.
Files validate per HTML5 and CSS standards.
CSS is used to style the site, but student does not demonstrate full understanding of rule selection/formation and relies on only the more basic CSS properties.
Includes most content, functionality, navigational components, branding and footer information requested; internal documentation not always present; not titled appropriately.
10
About Us Page & Subtopic Pages
20
Services Page
10
Contact Page & Subtopic Page
15
Accessibility
All pages provide full use of accessibility features to accommodate all users.
All pages include some accessibility features to accommodate all users.
Some pages include some accessibility features to accommodate all users.
5
TOTAL
Total Score:
/100
7/14/2015 Let’s Do Some Railing - The New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/28/opinion/gail-collins-lets-do-some-railing.html?_r=0 1/4
http://nyti.ms/1HNyAFu
The Opinion Pages | O P - E D C O L U M N I S T
Let’s Do Some Railing
MAY 28, 2015
Gail Collins ...
The Hydrogen Super Highway elevated rail system proposal for the West Cost of the United States.
Tri-State proposal for California, Oregon and Washington on I5.
Sustainable Development at the highest level of infrastructure development. Also known as the Motor City Maglev, because we take Transportation and Safety to a Higher Level.
Rebuilding America’s Infrastructure The Road Ahead for Transportation Enginee...online Marketing
Apply for engineering careers. Find engineering vacancies with LVI Associates, the leading engineering recruiters. For more information, please visit: https://www.lviassociates.com/
Similar to The Amtrak Funding Debate:Why Amtrak Should Continue to Receive Federal Subsidies (20)
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptxtanyjahb
A personal brand exploration presentation summarizes an individual's unique qualities and goals, covering strengths, values, passions, and target audience. It helps individuals understand what makes them stand out, their desired image, and how they aim to achieve it.
Explore our most comprehensive guide on lookback analysis at SafePaaS, covering access governance and how it can transform modern ERP audits. Browse now!
Falcon stands out as a top-tier P2P Invoice Discounting platform in India, bridging esteemed blue-chip companies and eager investors. Our goal is to transform the investment landscape in India by establishing a comprehensive destination for borrowers and investors with diverse profiles and needs, all while minimizing risk. What sets Falcon apart is the elimination of intermediaries such as commercial banks and depository institutions, allowing investors to enjoy higher yields.
Putting the SPARK into Virtual Training.pptxCynthia Clay
This 60-minute webinar, sponsored by Adobe, was delivered for the Training Mag Network. It explored the five elements of SPARK: Storytelling, Purpose, Action, Relationships, and Kudos. Knowing how to tell a well-structured story is key to building long-term memory. Stating a clear purpose that doesn't take away from the discovery learning process is critical. Ensuring that people move from theory to practical application is imperative. Creating strong social learning is the key to commitment and engagement. Validating and affirming participants' comments is the way to create a positive learning environment.
Remote sensing and monitoring are changing the mining industry for the better. These are providing innovative solutions to long-standing challenges. Those related to exploration, extraction, and overall environmental management by mining technology companies Odisha. These technologies make use of satellite imaging, aerial photography and sensors to collect data that might be inaccessible or from hazardous locations. With the use of this technology, mining operations are becoming increasingly efficient. Let us gain more insight into the key aspects associated with remote sensing and monitoring when it comes to mining.
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern BusinessesSynapseIndia
Stay ahead of the curve with our premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions. Our expert developers utilize MongoDB, Express.js, AngularJS, and Node.js to create modern and responsive web applications. Trust us for cutting-edge solutions that drive your business growth and success.
Know more: https://www.synapseindia.com/technology/mean-stack-development-company.html
Cracking the Workplace Discipline Code Main.pptxWorkforce Group
Cultivating and maintaining discipline within teams is a critical differentiator for successful organisations.
Forward-thinking leaders and business managers understand the impact that discipline has on organisational success. A disciplined workforce operates with clarity, focus, and a shared understanding of expectations, ultimately driving better results, optimising productivity, and facilitating seamless collaboration.
Although discipline is not a one-size-fits-all approach, it can help create a work environment that encourages personal growth and accountability rather than solely relying on punitive measures.
In this deck, you will learn the significance of workplace discipline for organisational success. You’ll also learn
• Four (4) workplace discipline methods you should consider
• The best and most practical approach to implementing workplace discipline.
• Three (3) key tips to maintain a disciplined workplace.
Enterprise Excellence is Inclusive Excellence.pdfKaiNexus
Enterprise excellence and inclusive excellence are closely linked, and real-world challenges have shown that both are essential to the success of any organization. To achieve enterprise excellence, organizations must focus on improving their operations and processes while creating an inclusive environment that engages everyone. In this interactive session, the facilitator will highlight commonly established business practices and how they limit our ability to engage everyone every day. More importantly, though, participants will likely gain increased awareness of what we can do differently to maximize enterprise excellence through deliberate inclusion.
What is Enterprise Excellence?
Enterprise Excellence is a holistic approach that's aimed at achieving world-class performance across all aspects of the organization.
What might I learn?
A way to engage all in creating Inclusive Excellence. Lessons from the US military and their parallels to the story of Harry Potter. How belt systems and CI teams can destroy inclusive practices. How leadership language invites people to the party. There are three things leaders can do to engage everyone every day: maximizing psychological safety to create environments where folks learn, contribute, and challenge the status quo.
Who might benefit? Anyone and everyone leading folks from the shop floor to top floor.
Dr. William Harvey is a seasoned Operations Leader with extensive experience in chemical processing, manufacturing, and operations management. At Michelman, he currently oversees multiple sites, leading teams in strategic planning and coaching/practicing continuous improvement. William is set to start his eighth year of teaching at the University of Cincinnati where he teaches marketing, finance, and management. William holds various certifications in change management, quality, leadership, operational excellence, team building, and DiSC, among others.
The world of search engine optimization (SEO) is buzzing with discussions after Google confirmed that around 2,500 leaked internal documents related to its Search feature are indeed authentic. The revelation has sparked significant concerns within the SEO community. The leaked documents were initially reported by SEO experts Rand Fishkin and Mike King, igniting widespread analysis and discourse. For More Info:- https://news.arihantwebtech.com/search-disrupted-googles-leaked-documents-rock-the-seo-world/
The Amtrak Funding Debate:Why Amtrak Should Continue to Receive Federal Subsidies
1. The Amtrak Funding Debate:
Why Amtrak Should Continue To
Receive Federal Subsidies
Adam R. Schott
BUS 378.01
2. Amtrak Funding Debate 2
In February 2005, President George W. Bush announced that his Fiscal Year 2006
Budget for the United States would include no funding for Amtrak - the only intercity
passenger railroad in the nation. This paper will analyze the implications of eliminating
federal subsidization of Amtrak from the perspective of the business-government-society
relationship.
Background
Amtrak’s official name is the National Railroad Passenger Corporation; it was
created by Congress in 1970 “to take over the money-losing passenger rail service
previously operated by private freight railroad companies” (Amtrak Website, 2005). The
idea was that “it would rapidly become a for-profit, self-sustaining entity” (“No Way to
Run a Railroad”, 2005). In its thirty-year life, Amtrak has received over $30 billion in
federal subsidies, compared to $1.89 trillion to air and highway modes. Amtrak is
dependent on these subsidies and “is constantly threatened by under-investment, lack of a
clearly articulated federal rail policy, and an uncertain future” (Amtrak Website, 2005).
Business – Government Relationship
No intercity passenger rail system in the world operates without some form of
government subsidization (Amtrak Website, 2005). European passenger rail systems,
though much smaller, receive much more government support. The British government
invests over $14.5 billion in the British Rail System (“The Amtrak Funding Scandal”,
2005). The most Amtrak has ever received from the government is $1.6 billion in fiscal
years 1998 through 2000 (“No Way to Run a Railroad”, 2005). See Appendix A
3. Amtrak Funding Debate 3
Congress created the National Railroad Passenger Corporation to ensure that there
would be an intercity passenger railroad; yet it does not commit the necessary resources to
allow it to succeed. Now the President wants t intentionally send it into bankruptcy.
o
As Sarkar states, “federal subsidies account for $1.2 billion of Amtrak’s overall
budget of $3 billion this fiscal year. Without it, the company – already saddled with $3.8
billion in debt – would be forced into bankruptcy, leaving courts to decide how to
restructure it” (2005).
President Bush and Norman Y. Mineta, the United States Secretary of
Transportation, allege that Amtrak has not made significant progress towards financial
independence and stability and has not kept up with the times (Mineta, 2005). In Railway
Age, Mineta is quoted as calling the zero-funding proposal “a wake-up call” for Congress
to address a system that “cannot even support the existing service, much less expand in the
way that it needs to.” He also said that Amtrak is “dying, and everyone knows it”
(“Amtrak under siege”, 2005).
In his February 2005 Annual Report to Congress, David M. Laney, the Chairman of
the Board of Directors of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation, rebuts that Amtrak
has made significant progress in recent years.
Under the leadership of David Gunn, Amtrak is finally headed toward greater
financial independence and profitability. Since May 2002, when he took over as President
and CEO of Amtrak, Gunn has made the following changes:
The development of accounting and financial reporting systems
A reduction in personnel by almost 5,000
The development of a detailed and prioritized five-year capital plan focused
on restoring the Northeast Corridor to necessary levels of reliability and
safety, and on restoration of an aging fleet of rolling stock used throughout
the system
Termination of the mail and express operatio n
Elimination or truncation of three long-distance routes
4. Amtrak Funding Debate 4
No new borrowings, and the scheduled repayment of the $100 million
Department of Transportation loan over a five year period begun in 2004
Increased ridership from 22.5 million in 2000 to 25.1 million in 2004
Containment of the cash operating requirement at or below $570 million
(Laney, 2005)
Laney also points out that sending Amtrak into bankruptcy will have the exact
opposite effect that Bush and Mineta desire. He states:
Needed reforms will likely result in higher front-end restructuring costs.
(Route elimination, for instance, will often incur substantially greater labor-
related costs in the early years than would route continuation; but such costs
can be carefully phased and managed.) And for passenger rail to have any
chance of succeeding under Amtrak’s auspices or in others’ hands,
legislative action is essential to remove constraints that will otherwise
permanently undercut its performance in an increasingly competitive
environment. (2005)
Progress at Amtrak
The five-year capital investment program has been instrumental in reducing
operating costs and making Amtrak more efficient and is the key to Amtrak’s future
progress; but it cannot continue without adequate funding. The following excerpts from
David L. Gunn’s memo to David M. Laney highlight how the plan has Amtrak heading on
the track to success:
The capital program is grounded in a “production line” approach to ensure
plant and equipment are rebuilt making the most efficient use of labor and
materials, rather than the previous approach of repairing assets as they fail. In
spite of the challenges inherent in ramping up such a program from essentially
nothing and with less federal funding than needed to meet the plan, we have
made steady progress in rebuilding plant and equipment …
…Amtrak has contained its operating costs and operating cash subsidy
requirements for two straight years – in spite of inflationary pressures in health
care, fuel prices and other areas. In fact, our core operating expenses were
slightly lower in FY04 than they were in FY00. We have done this while
covering over $250 million per year in debt service from earlier borrowing and
without assuming any new debt…
Amtrak’s decision to exit the mail and express business … removed a number
of road locomotives and switch engines from service, thus lowering
maintenance costs. (2005)
5. Amtrak Funding Debate 5
National Outcry: The Government – Society Relationship
The Bush Administration plans on reintroducing the Passenger Rail Investment
Reform Act, which Congress voted down in 2003 (“Amtrak under siege”, 2005). This act
transfers Amtrak funding from the federal government to the states. Under the plan, the
federal government would help out state governments – up to 50% of the funding – but
only to states that come up with their share (“Amtrak under siege”, 2005).
Senators from all over the nation are outraged at the Bush Administration’s Amtrak
plans. Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois told the Chicago Tribune “The most basic inquiry
would have told the Administration that the State of Illinois is not in a position to pickup
the subsidy of Amtrak: (“Amtrak under siege”, 2005). New Jersey Senator Frank
Lautenberg decried “President Bush is willing to spend billions to send a couple of people
to Mars, but not one dime for Amtrak’s 25 million annual travelers, who want better rail
service to destinations on this planet” (“Amtrak under siege”, 2005).
Minnesota Representative Jim Oberstar said of the budget: “Never have I seen one
so harsh or crass as this…It would cause widespread disruption and hardship” (“US
House”, 2005).
Senators Robert Byrd, Hillary Clinton, Edward M. Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy
co-sponsored an amendment to the 2006 budget bill that would provide Amtrak with $1.4
billion to save it from bankruptcy (“Senator Clinton”, 2005 / Wirzbicki, 2005).
Unfortunately the amendment failed in a 52-46 vote (Bush, 2005). It is now up to the
House of Representatives to restore this crucial funding.
6. Amtrak Funding Debate 6
Business – Society Relationship
Amtrak provides a valuable service to many states and communities. The railroad
provides jobs and tourist revenue to the cities it serves. It also allows citizens to travel from
city-to-city for much less than an airline and in less time than a bus service.
Over twenty-five million passengers rode on Amtrak in 2003 and 2004.
Approximately sixty-eight thousand passengers travel on Amtrak daily (Amtrak Website).
Appendix B shows how many people used the twenty busiest Amtrak stations in fiscal year
2004.
Senator Hillary Clinton points out that losing Amtrak would have a devastating
effect on New York. “Amtrak is an essential component of our transportation network that
provides irreplaceable capacity and mobility to New York and the nation. / Slashing
Amtrak’s federal funding would eliminate critical rail service to millions of New Yorkers
and others who ride our rails. It would throw our commuter rail lines into chaos and would
have catastrophic economic consequences for the state and the region” (“Senator Clinton”,
2005).
Massachusetts residents are also concerned about the fate of Amtrak - they depend
on the high-speed Acella Express for travel to New York and Washington (Ross, 2005).
As Ross states: “Despite troubles with delays, millions of people use the services every
year and would be forced to rely on increasingly crowded buses and air travel” (2005).
Losing Amtrak in California would undermine the economies that have been built
around the stations that serve 9.3 million passengers a year (Sarkar, 2005).
Amtrak’s growth is not just in the major cities “but also on long-distance trains that
serve hundreds of cities and rural communities” (Parcells, 2005)
7. Amtrak Funding Debate 7
According to the Louisiana Association of Railroad Passengers, “Amtrak employed
a total of 363 Louisiana residents and 102 Mississippi residents over the course of the year,
with a payroll of $18,804,934, while spending a total of $5 million for Louisiana and
Mississippi goods and services” (“La. rail passenger group”, 2005). If Amtrak is forced
into bankruptcy these jobs, and the revenue generated as a result of rail travel in
Mississippi and Louisiana will likely be lost.
Eliminating federal funding for Amtrak would severely hurt communities in
Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Arkansas Representative Marion Berry states that
“Infrastructure is the lifeblood of rural America. We cannot expect to eliminate
transportation options for growing areas of this country and expect their economies to
continue to expand” (“Proposed Cut”, 2005).
The job of the federal government is “to promote the general Welfare”
(Constitution of the United States of America, Preamble, 1787) – that is, to ensure that the
needs of its citizens are met. In the case of intercity rail transit this is done through the
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, a government agency that took over for private
railroads that were losing money. Congress had hoped that Amtrak could be completely
privatized but this is not the case: It depends on government subsidies to continue
operations.
The job of private business is to make a profit, to increase shareholder wealth, and
to act in the best interest of stakeholders. There is no privately owned intercity passenger
railroad system any more because none could be operated profitably.
It is very clear that this country needs a national intercity rail system. If the federal
government does cut all funding for Amtrak, it will not be serving the best interests of its
citizens and will jeopardize the welfare of many communities and regions.
8. Amtrak Funding Debate 8
As Liz Boyd, spokeswoman for Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm, states “our
hope is that Congress would also recognize the economic and quality-of-life value of
interstate rail” (Heming, 2005). It is very doubtful that a private business will take over
intercity passenger rail service should Amtrak disappear. Congress must commit to
funding Amtrak – it is the socially responsible thing to do.
10. Amtrak Funding Debate 10
APPENDIX B
Top Twenty Busiest Amtrak Stations, 2004
Rank Code City/Station Boardings Alightings Total
1 NYP New York, NY 4,367,553 4,356,679 8,724,232
2 WAS Washington, DC 1,888,459 1,856,251 3,744,710
3 PHL Philadelphia, PA 1,844,887 1,845,733 3,690,620
4 CHI Chicago, IL 1,179,955 1,166,793 2,346,748
5 NWK Newark, NJ 684,050 693,004 1,377,054
6 LAX Los Angeles, CA 644,845 641,077 1,285,922
7 TRE Trenton, NJ 499,399 519,388 1,108,787
8 BOS Boston, MA 488,912 498,000 986,912
9 PJC Princeton Jct., NJ 449,608 482,653 932,261
10 BAL Baltimore, MD 455,059 463,565 918,624
11 SAC Sacramento, CA 443,827 427,571 871,398
12 SAN San Diego, CA 398,720 381,575 780,295
13 WIL Wilmington, DE 372,104 376,275 748,379
14 ALB Albany-Rensselaer, NY 323,160 325,579 648,739
15 NHV New Haven, CT 309,268 308,370 617,638
16 BWI BWI Airport, MD 296,466 293,854 590,610
17 SEA Seattle, WA 299,466 290,575 590,610
18 PVD Providence, RI 239,209 245,305 484,514
19 IRV Irvine, CA 236,090 238,035 474,125
20 EMY Emeryville, CA 237,766 233,545 471,311
(Source: Amtrak Website)
11. Amtrak Funding Debate 11
WORKS CITED
“Amtrak: Background & Facts.” Amtrak Website. Accessed 28 March, 2005.
<http://www.amtrak.com>
“Amtrak Facts.” Amtrak Website. <http://www.amtrak.com> Accessed 28 March, 2005.
“The Amtrak Funding Scandal.” The Travel Insider.
<http://www.thetravelinsider.info/2002/0628.htm> Accessed 6 April, 2005
“Amtrak Under Siege – Again.” Railway Age. March 2005, 19.
Bush, Rudolf. “Senate Blocks $1 Billion To Fund Amtrak.” Chicago Tribune. 17 Mar.
2005 <http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/>. Accessed 4/9/2005.
Heming, Julia. “Bush wants to shift Amtrak funding to states.” The Michigan Daily. 22
Feb. 2005. <http://www.michigandaily.com> Accessed 25 Mar. 2005.
“La. rail passenger group aims to halt Amtrak cuts.” BizNewOrleans:News.
<http://bizneworleans.com/109+M5 b0cc37a0dd.html> Accessed 8 April 2005.
Laney, David M. “Annual Report to Congress”. 17 Feb. 2005.
<http://www.amtrak.com/pdf/AnnualReportCongres s021705.pdf>
Mineta, Norman Y. “Starving Amtrak to Save It.” The New York Times. 23 Feb. 2005.
<http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/23/23mineta.html>
“No Way to Run a Railroad” The Wall Street Journal. 10 Feb. 2005. A12
“Unfairly, Amtrak Is Held to a Different Standard.” The Wall Street Journal. 23 Feb. 2005.
A17
“Proposed Cut In US Funding For Amtrak Draws Arkansas Ire.” The Wall Street Journal
Online. 8 Feb. 2005.
<http://online.wsj.com/artcle_print/0,,BT_CO_20050208_009 588,00.html>.
Accessed 25 Feb. 2005
Ross, Casey. “Bush plan off track: Cuts may derail Amtrak.” BostonHerald.com. 24 Feb.
2005.
<http://news.bostonherald.com/politics/view.bg?articleid=70104&format=text>
Accessed 25 Feb. 2005.
Sarkar, Pia. “Riding the rails: Amtrak has its fans, but Bush wants to cut the budget again.”
San Francisco Chronicle. 25 Feb. 2005. <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-
bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/02/05/BUGJUBGM861.DTL> Accessed 25 Feb. 2005.
“Senator Clinton Co-Sponsors Legislation to Help Save Amtrak.” Senator Hillary Rodham
Clinton Website. <http://clinton.senate.gov/~clinton/news/2005/2005315C10.html>
Accessed 7 April 2005
“US House Democrats Vow Fight To Protect Amtrak Funding.” The Wall Street Journal
Online. 8 Feb. 2005.
<http://online.wsj.com/article_print/0,,BT_CO_20050208_009994,00.html>
Accessed 25 Feb. 2005.
Wirzbicki, Alan. “Democrats’ bid to save Amtrak funding loses steam in Senate: Effort to
restore federal dollars fails by close vote:” The Boston Globe.
<http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/03/17/democrats_b
id_to_save_amtrak_funding_loses_steam_in_senate/> Accessed 6 Apr. 2005.