The document summarizes the issues surrounding the European debt crisis and austerity measures. It discusses how the crisis was sparked by government budget deficits in Greece, Portugal, Spain, and Ireland. In response, the EU and IMF created a $1 trillion stabilization fund to provide financial support with strict conditions of austerity through spending cuts and tax increases. While this may stabilize the situation short-term, the long-term challenges of economic recovery in Europe and budget deficits globally were not fully addressed.
Two clouds hung over the financial markets in the late summer: worries about a European financial crisis and concerns that the U.S. economy might be tipping back into recession. Real GDP rose at a 2.5% annual rate in the advance estimate for 3Q11, which should put to rest fears that the U.S. economy has already entered recession. However, there are still some important uncertainties in the growth outlook for 2012. European leaders dodged a bullet last week, with the agreement on Greek debt (failure would have triggered a more immediate crisis). However, they did not put a number of problems to bed completely. So, how long will the good feelings last?
One of the key themes for investors in early 2011 is likely to be a shifting economic picture. For the stock market, things tend to be all or none. That is, either the economy is booming or it’s falling apart – there’s not much ground in the middle. Investors seem to struggle with moderate and uneven economic growth. The tax cut package has taken the double-dip recession scenario off the table, but the data for the next few months are likely to be mixed, suggesting strong growth in one set of figures and more moderate growth in another. That back and forth should create some opportunities for investors.
Higher oil prices have raised new concerns about the strength of the economic recovery. If sustained, the rise in gasoline prices will restrain the pace of economic growth noticeably, but does not appear to be large enough (so far) to derail the expansion. Meanwhile, a federal government shutdown looms as lawmakers bicker over the future path of expenditures. Austerity at all levels of government is well-intentioned, but is not advisable at this point in the economic recovery.
High levels of government debt are a big concern for investors both here and abroad. Efforts must be made eventually to reduce deficits. However, acting too soon will weaken the economic recovery. Looking ahead, there are no easy solutions.
Later this month, the government will release the advance estimate of 3Q11 GDP growth. There are uncertainties in that estimate – inventories and foreign trade make up a relatively small part of the economy, but account for much of the quarterly variation in GDP growth. We already have a good idea regarding the “meat and potatoes” of that report. Consumer spending and business fixed investment expanded further in the third quarter, suggesting no recession in the near term. However, the economic outlook for 2012 is a lot less clear.
The first part of December is a busy time for economists. People want to know what’s going to happen in the coming year. However, nobody’s clairvoyant. Forecasts are certain to be wrong. We can only tell you what to expect. The outlook for 2011 has been especially challenging, as the ground has been shifting under our feet. The tax proposal, the rout in bonds, and simmering concerns about Europe would seem to have significant impacts on the growth outlook, and they do. However, as with any economic recovery, positive forces battle it out with negative forces, with the positive force eventually dominating. Along the way, the pace is typically uneven across time and across sectors. That implies some volatility in the markets as investors debate the strength of the recovery.
The recent economic data have been disappointing, but hardly a disaster. The broad range of indicators suggest a slowing in the pace of growth – not a contraction. One month does not a trend make, but the data have generated some anxieties about whether the current slow patch could be a lot longer lasting or turn into something more severe.
Two clouds hung over the financial markets in the late summer: worries about a European financial crisis and concerns that the U.S. economy might be tipping back into recession. Real GDP rose at a 2.5% annual rate in the advance estimate for 3Q11, which should put to rest fears that the U.S. economy has already entered recession. However, there are still some important uncertainties in the growth outlook for 2012. European leaders dodged a bullet last week, with the agreement on Greek debt (failure would have triggered a more immediate crisis). However, they did not put a number of problems to bed completely. So, how long will the good feelings last?
One of the key themes for investors in early 2011 is likely to be a shifting economic picture. For the stock market, things tend to be all or none. That is, either the economy is booming or it’s falling apart – there’s not much ground in the middle. Investors seem to struggle with moderate and uneven economic growth. The tax cut package has taken the double-dip recession scenario off the table, but the data for the next few months are likely to be mixed, suggesting strong growth in one set of figures and more moderate growth in another. That back and forth should create some opportunities for investors.
Higher oil prices have raised new concerns about the strength of the economic recovery. If sustained, the rise in gasoline prices will restrain the pace of economic growth noticeably, but does not appear to be large enough (so far) to derail the expansion. Meanwhile, a federal government shutdown looms as lawmakers bicker over the future path of expenditures. Austerity at all levels of government is well-intentioned, but is not advisable at this point in the economic recovery.
High levels of government debt are a big concern for investors both here and abroad. Efforts must be made eventually to reduce deficits. However, acting too soon will weaken the economic recovery. Looking ahead, there are no easy solutions.
Later this month, the government will release the advance estimate of 3Q11 GDP growth. There are uncertainties in that estimate – inventories and foreign trade make up a relatively small part of the economy, but account for much of the quarterly variation in GDP growth. We already have a good idea regarding the “meat and potatoes” of that report. Consumer spending and business fixed investment expanded further in the third quarter, suggesting no recession in the near term. However, the economic outlook for 2012 is a lot less clear.
The first part of December is a busy time for economists. People want to know what’s going to happen in the coming year. However, nobody’s clairvoyant. Forecasts are certain to be wrong. We can only tell you what to expect. The outlook for 2011 has been especially challenging, as the ground has been shifting under our feet. The tax proposal, the rout in bonds, and simmering concerns about Europe would seem to have significant impacts on the growth outlook, and they do. However, as with any economic recovery, positive forces battle it out with negative forces, with the positive force eventually dominating. Along the way, the pace is typically uneven across time and across sectors. That implies some volatility in the markets as investors debate the strength of the recovery.
The recent economic data have been disappointing, but hardly a disaster. The broad range of indicators suggest a slowing in the pace of growth – not a contraction. One month does not a trend make, but the data have generated some anxieties about whether the current slow patch could be a lot longer lasting or turn into something more severe.
Last week, the federal government breached the current debt ceiling, $14.284 trillion. The Treasury had begun taking evasive action the week before, but warned that it couldn’t do so beyond early August – and Congress would have to raise the debt ceiling before then. Will the government default? The strong betting is that it won’t. The bond market doesn’t seem to be worried. However, the increased rhetoric could have a bigger impact on the equity and currency markets.
The recent data have been mixed, consistent with a slower rate of economic growth in the near term. The economy faced a number of headwinds in the first half of the year. Some of those headwinds are likely to be temporary. Others will linger. Growth should pick up in the second half of the year, but the pace seems unlikely to be especially strong
The Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed’s policymaking arm, will meet on November 2-3. Clearly, there are some differences of opinion among senior Fed officials regarding the appropriate path for monetary policy. However, the dissenters (those wanting to do less) are a small minority. The FOMC will come together with a somewhat less troublesome near-term economic outlook (no recession in the near term), but there are more concerns about growth in 2012.
Senior Fed officials meet next week amid what is widely seen as a slow patch in economic growth. A key question for investors, as well as for monetary policymakers, is whether this slowing will be temporary. Most likely, growth should pick up in the second half of the year. However, there are downside risks in the near term. Moreover, monetary policy appears to be handcuffed and fiscal policy is set to go in the wrong direction.
Financial institutions face both domestic and international regulatory uncertainty. Learn what we think you should prepare for in 2017 and how EAI can help.
The Economic Outlook – In A Holding PatternJeff Green
Recent economic figures have been consistent with the view of lackluster-to-moderate growth in the near term – not a recession, although the risk of a renewed downturn remains. Whether the U.S. slips back into recession depends on a number of factors: gasoline prices, developments in Europe, and policies that may or may not come out of Washington, D.C.
Inflation Expectations, Budget DecisionsJeff Green
On the surface, the February Employment Report was strong, but the details suggest more moderate improvement in the labor market. Still, new hiring is likely to pick up in the spring. Higher oil prices threaten the outlook for jobs and the overall economy. The Fed appears to be in a tough spot, but should keep monetary policy accommodative for some time.
Commodity prices have moved sharply higher over the last several months, leading to increased worries that the Fed is “behind the curve,” “debasing the currency,” or “monetizing the debt.” Such fears are based on a poor understanding of the inflation process and how the Fed conducts monetary policy.
Commodity prices have moved sharply higher over the last several months, leading to increased worries that the Fed is “behind the curve,” “debasing the currency,” or “monetizing the debt.” Such fears are based on a poor understanding of the inflation process and how the Fed conducts monetary policy.
Later this month, Fed Chairman Bernanke will hold his first post-FOMC meeting press conference. Officially, the press conference is meant “to present the Federal Open Market Committee's current economic projections and to provide additional context for the FOMC's policy decisions.” However, the real goal is to reclaim the narrative. The Fed was caught off guard by the amount of criticism and second-guessing it received in 2010. Fed Chairman Bernanke tried hard to counter that, appearing on 60 Minutes, speaking to trade groups, and so on. These press conferences should help clear things up regarding monetary policy – not that we’ll receive clear signals of future Fed policy moves – rather, we’ll get important information on how the Fed will decide what to do.
On the surface, the February Employment Report was strong, but the details suggest more moderate improvement in the labor market. Still, new hiring is likely to pick up in the spring. Higher oil prices threaten the outlook for jobs and the overall economy. The Fed appears to be in a tough spot, but should keep monetary policy accommodative for some time.
The recent economic data have been generally weaker than expected, casting some doubt on the prospects for the recovery. However, economic recoveries are not usually associated with steady growth across sectors. Growth is inherently uneven. That means that some economic reports will be strong and some weak – and that is especially true in the current environment, where the economy has to deal with a number of serious headwinds. Economic statistics are also subject to seasonal adjustment difficulties and, as we’re likely to see in much of the February data, the peculiarities of the weather. Bad February weather will not cause a double dip, but it may add to the unease in the financial markets in the near term.
The June Employment Report was disappointing. Nonfarm payrolls rose less than expected. Figures for April and May were revised lower. Average weekly hours declined. Temp-help employment fell. There were no bright spots. That doesn’t mean that the economy won’t recover in the second half, but headwinds will prevent growth from being a lot stronger.
Research on past recessions shows that downturns that are caused by financial crises tend to be more severe, longer lasting, and with more gradual recoveries than a typical recession. The current recovery is playing out largely as anticipated. The economy is improving, although the labor market remains weak. That should be no surprise to anyone.
A year ago, in a sharply weakening economy, deflation seemed a credible threat. However, a rebound in energy prices has boosted the Consumer Price Index over the last 12 months. Improvement in the global economy has led to a firming in commodity prices. Despite the diminished threat of deflation, core inflation at the consumer level has trended lower, thanks in large part to weakness in rents (a consequence of residential housing troubles).
The advance estimate of fourth quarter GDP growth was relatively close to expectations. However, two major components, net exports and the change in inventories, were much larger than anticipated (net exports added to GDP, slower inventory accumulation subtracted). Underlying domestic demand was roughly as anticipated, but the inventory story (assuming that it holds up in revisions) implies stronger growth in the near term. Instead of GDP growth of 3.0% to 3.5% in 2011 (4Q-over-4Q), it now appears more like 3.5% to 4.0%
Faster than a speeding tortoise, more powerful than suntan lotion, unable to leap small objects in a single bound – the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction (aka “the super committee”) is stumbling toward its November 23 deadline.
The debt ceiling crisis heated up last week, as Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s threatened to lower the credit rating on U.S. debt. The financial markets appeared not to notice or to care, but may simply be expressing a confidence that the debt ceiling will be raised in time. After all, we’ve been here before. As dysfunctional as Washington is, lawmakers aren’t foolish enough to cause a self-inflicted financial calamity. Or are they?
Last week, the federal government breached the current debt ceiling, $14.284 trillion. The Treasury had begun taking evasive action the week before, but warned that it couldn’t do so beyond early August – and Congress would have to raise the debt ceiling before then. Will the government default? The strong betting is that it won’t. The bond market doesn’t seem to be worried. However, the increased rhetoric could have a bigger impact on the equity and currency markets.
The recent data have been mixed, consistent with a slower rate of economic growth in the near term. The economy faced a number of headwinds in the first half of the year. Some of those headwinds are likely to be temporary. Others will linger. Growth should pick up in the second half of the year, but the pace seems unlikely to be especially strong
The Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed’s policymaking arm, will meet on November 2-3. Clearly, there are some differences of opinion among senior Fed officials regarding the appropriate path for monetary policy. However, the dissenters (those wanting to do less) are a small minority. The FOMC will come together with a somewhat less troublesome near-term economic outlook (no recession in the near term), but there are more concerns about growth in 2012.
Senior Fed officials meet next week amid what is widely seen as a slow patch in economic growth. A key question for investors, as well as for monetary policymakers, is whether this slowing will be temporary. Most likely, growth should pick up in the second half of the year. However, there are downside risks in the near term. Moreover, monetary policy appears to be handcuffed and fiscal policy is set to go in the wrong direction.
Financial institutions face both domestic and international regulatory uncertainty. Learn what we think you should prepare for in 2017 and how EAI can help.
The Economic Outlook – In A Holding PatternJeff Green
Recent economic figures have been consistent with the view of lackluster-to-moderate growth in the near term – not a recession, although the risk of a renewed downturn remains. Whether the U.S. slips back into recession depends on a number of factors: gasoline prices, developments in Europe, and policies that may or may not come out of Washington, D.C.
Inflation Expectations, Budget DecisionsJeff Green
On the surface, the February Employment Report was strong, but the details suggest more moderate improvement in the labor market. Still, new hiring is likely to pick up in the spring. Higher oil prices threaten the outlook for jobs and the overall economy. The Fed appears to be in a tough spot, but should keep monetary policy accommodative for some time.
Commodity prices have moved sharply higher over the last several months, leading to increased worries that the Fed is “behind the curve,” “debasing the currency,” or “monetizing the debt.” Such fears are based on a poor understanding of the inflation process and how the Fed conducts monetary policy.
Commodity prices have moved sharply higher over the last several months, leading to increased worries that the Fed is “behind the curve,” “debasing the currency,” or “monetizing the debt.” Such fears are based on a poor understanding of the inflation process and how the Fed conducts monetary policy.
Later this month, Fed Chairman Bernanke will hold his first post-FOMC meeting press conference. Officially, the press conference is meant “to present the Federal Open Market Committee's current economic projections and to provide additional context for the FOMC's policy decisions.” However, the real goal is to reclaim the narrative. The Fed was caught off guard by the amount of criticism and second-guessing it received in 2010. Fed Chairman Bernanke tried hard to counter that, appearing on 60 Minutes, speaking to trade groups, and so on. These press conferences should help clear things up regarding monetary policy – not that we’ll receive clear signals of future Fed policy moves – rather, we’ll get important information on how the Fed will decide what to do.
On the surface, the February Employment Report was strong, but the details suggest more moderate improvement in the labor market. Still, new hiring is likely to pick up in the spring. Higher oil prices threaten the outlook for jobs and the overall economy. The Fed appears to be in a tough spot, but should keep monetary policy accommodative for some time.
The recent economic data have been generally weaker than expected, casting some doubt on the prospects for the recovery. However, economic recoveries are not usually associated with steady growth across sectors. Growth is inherently uneven. That means that some economic reports will be strong and some weak – and that is especially true in the current environment, where the economy has to deal with a number of serious headwinds. Economic statistics are also subject to seasonal adjustment difficulties and, as we’re likely to see in much of the February data, the peculiarities of the weather. Bad February weather will not cause a double dip, but it may add to the unease in the financial markets in the near term.
The June Employment Report was disappointing. Nonfarm payrolls rose less than expected. Figures for April and May were revised lower. Average weekly hours declined. Temp-help employment fell. There were no bright spots. That doesn’t mean that the economy won’t recover in the second half, but headwinds will prevent growth from being a lot stronger.
Research on past recessions shows that downturns that are caused by financial crises tend to be more severe, longer lasting, and with more gradual recoveries than a typical recession. The current recovery is playing out largely as anticipated. The economy is improving, although the labor market remains weak. That should be no surprise to anyone.
A year ago, in a sharply weakening economy, deflation seemed a credible threat. However, a rebound in energy prices has boosted the Consumer Price Index over the last 12 months. Improvement in the global economy has led to a firming in commodity prices. Despite the diminished threat of deflation, core inflation at the consumer level has trended lower, thanks in large part to weakness in rents (a consequence of residential housing troubles).
The advance estimate of fourth quarter GDP growth was relatively close to expectations. However, two major components, net exports and the change in inventories, were much larger than anticipated (net exports added to GDP, slower inventory accumulation subtracted). Underlying domestic demand was roughly as anticipated, but the inventory story (assuming that it holds up in revisions) implies stronger growth in the near term. Instead of GDP growth of 3.0% to 3.5% in 2011 (4Q-over-4Q), it now appears more like 3.5% to 4.0%
Faster than a speeding tortoise, more powerful than suntan lotion, unable to leap small objects in a single bound – the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction (aka “the super committee”) is stumbling toward its November 23 deadline.
The debt ceiling crisis heated up last week, as Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s threatened to lower the credit rating on U.S. debt. The financial markets appeared not to notice or to care, but may simply be expressing a confidence that the debt ceiling will be raised in time. After all, we’ve been here before. As dysfunctional as Washington is, lawmakers aren’t foolish enough to cause a self-inflicted financial calamity. Or are they?
It's no secret that what's happening in Europe is driving financial markets worldwide. Even if you have a sound asset allocation strategy and a well-diversified portfolio, it's hard to ignore the fact that this summer seems to have the potential for turbulence. Markets dislike uncertainty, and at this point uncertainty is high, particularly in advance of the June 17 elections scheduled in Greece.
Loan growth plays a key role in economic expansion. Simply put: no loan growth, no economic growth. However, there’s a downside. Debt doesn’t matter until it does. Debt has played a key part in the economic downturn and in the gradual recovery. Europe’s sovereign debt crisis has continued to escalate, with no easy way out. In the U.S., the government has borrowed more, but the markets have not punished it for doing so. There’s no sign that that is going to change anytime soon.
The November Employment Report was disappointing. The stock market had set its sights high, anticipating stronger growth in nonfarm payrolls and a steady unemployment rate. Moreover, market participants seemed to be hoping for an upside surprise relative to the consensus forecast. The holiday shopping season apparently got off to a strong start, but that failed to translate into a corresponding jump in retail employment (at least, on a seasonally adjusted basis). Manufacturing jobs were soft. State and local government continued to shed jobs, reflecting budget strains. What’s in store for 2011? The November jobs data aren’t encouraging, but the recovery is likely to remain on track.
It’s well known that recessions that are caused by financial crises are much more severe, are longer lasting, and are followed by gradual recoveries. Another lesson from history is that during these recoveries, policies are often tightened too soon. In 1937, efforts to balance the budget led to a recession within the Great Depression. It’s said that those who don’t remember the past are doomed to repeat it.
Is there a fate worse than debt? If there is, it seems to be not dealing with the debt. When there is too much leverage in the system, there is always a risk that things go wrong quickly and unexpectedly. Ken Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart have an op-ed piece on Bloomberg today about the debt overhang and its implications for economic growth. They are among the few commentators who have been consistently correct about the path of the financial crisis, probably because they are among the few who have studied the actual data.
After all the debate in recent weeks over issues related to raising the nation's debt limit, it's hard to know exactly what might happen after August 2. Borrowing represents more than 40% of the nation's expenses, and any default on the country's obligations would be unprecedented.
The advance figure for fourth quarter growth surprised to the upside, although the story was largely as anticipated. The GDP data will be revised at the end of February and again in late March (and in perpetuity, in annual benchmark revisions). Don’t get too wedded to the numbers. However, the story is unlikely to change much in revision.
In the last few months, some have taken to calling the current economic period, “the Lesser Depression” (instead of “the Great Recession”). There’s no precise definition of “a depression” (and as it is, the definition of “a recession” is rather vague). Most economists would say a depression is a lengthy period of elevated unemployment. That’s exactly what we may be staring out now. Monetary and fiscal policy could provide further support for growth, but there’s a lot of resistance.
What is the "fiscal cliff"? It's the term being used by many to describe the unique combination of tax increases and spending cuts scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2013. The ominous term reflects the belief by some that, taken together, higher taxes and decreased spending at the levels prescribed have the potential to derail the economy. Whether we do indeed step off the cliff at the end of the year, and what exactly that will mean for the economy, depends on several factors.
Commodity prices have moved sharply higher over the last several months, leading to increased worries that the Fed is “behind the curve,” “debasing the currency,” or “monetizing the debt.” Such fears are based on a poor understanding of the inflation process and how the Fed conducts monetary policy.
The Federal Open Market Committee will meet on Tuesday to set monetary policy. The Fed is widely expected to leave short-term interest rates unchanged and the wording of the economic assessment should be largely the same as in the previous statement. However, we could see another round of asset purchases or some changes to the Fed’s communications.
The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012Jeff Green
The new year began with some political drama, as last-minute negotiations attempted to avert sending the nation over the "fiscal cliff." Technically, we actually did go over the cliff, however briefly, as a host of tax provisions and automatic spending cuts took effect at the stroke of midnight on December 31, 2012.
Time Running Out for Large Gifts in 2012Jeff Green
Currently, the exemptions for federal gift tax, estate tax, and generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax are at historic highs, and the gift, estate, and GST tax rates are at historic lows. But, in 2013, the exemptions are scheduled to substantially decrease, and the tax rates are scheduled to substantially increase. This raises the question of whether 2012 might be a good time to make large gifts that take advantage of the current large exemptions while they are still available.
What Does the Supreme Court Ruling on the Health-Care Reform Law Mean for You?Jeff Green
On June 28, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled, in a landmark decision, that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), including the provision that most Americans carry health insurance or pay a penalty, is constitutional.
The S&P 500 (SPX) has tested 1366 on the upside twice, and not had any success even hanging around this level, as it’s been pushed down quickly both times. This doesn’t bode well for an upside resolution in the near term, but it’s certainly a possibility.
Background
As 401(k) plans have become more popular, plan participants have become increasingly responsible for making their own retirement savings decisions. The Department of Labor (DOL) has become concerned that participants in self-directed 401(k) plans (those that allow participants to direct the investment of their own accounts) might not have access to, or might not be considering, information critical to making informed decisions about the management of their accounts--particularly information on investment choices, fees, and expenses.
A positive sign that has come as a result of the back and forth action in the markets over the past couple of weeks is the emergence of a triangle pattern in the S&P 500 (SPX). A triangle pattern, in and of itself, is neither a bullish pattern nor a bearish pattern until the pattern has completed.
At this time last year, income tax planning was particularly challenging. Several tax deductions had already expired, and significant changes, including new, higher income tax rates, were scheduled to take effect at the end of the year. Legislation passed in mid-December, however, hit the "reset" button, reinstituting already-expired deductions, and extending major tax provisions--including lower rates--for an additional one to two years.
The Fed Outlook: Uncertainty and ReluctanceJeff Green
The Federal Open Market Committee policy statement and Chairman Bernanke’s post-meeting press conference held few surprises. Monetary policy is still accommodative – and still on hold. There’s also apparently little will at the Fed to do more to help the recovery along. Fortunately for the Fed and the consumer, we can catch a break if oil prices continue to decline.
1. 6363 Woodway Dr. Suite 870
Houston, TX 77057
Phone: 713-244-3030
Fax: 713-513-5669
Securities are offered through
RAYMOND JAMES
FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Member FINRA / SIPC
Green Financial Group
An Independent Firm
Weekly Commentary by Dr. Scott Brown
The Age Of Austerity
May 24 – 28, 2010
The European debt crisis encompasses many issues, including problems in the construction of the monetary union.
However, the main catalyst has been concerns about government budget deficits (Greece, Portugal, Spain, Ireland). The
solution, which should be considered a least-worse alternative, is austerity – cuts in government spending and tax
increases for specific countries. Such moves dampen the pace of economic recovery and, in some cases, may lead to
recession. The U.S. is not Greece. The U.S. budget deficit is currently very high (roughly 10% of GDP), but should
decline as the economy recovers and temporary spending (the bank rescue and the fiscal stimulus) fade. The bigger
problem for the U.S. federal budget deficit lies 10 to 20 years out, as Medicare expenditures are projected to surge. At
the state and local level, budget deficits are leading to tax increases and cuts in government services. The trick will be
to trim deficits without dampening growth too much.
Concerns about Greece’s budget situation have been simmering for several months, but reached a boiling point toward
the end of April. Rating downgrades of the sovereign debt of Greece, Portugal, and Spain contributed to a widening in
spreads in government bonds relative to German bunds and ignited worries that one or more countries could exit the
euro. Fear begets more fear. A lack of clear, strong leadership seemed to make matters worse. Greece’s external debt is
relatively small in the grand scheme of things. The bigger worry has been the risk of contagion. After Greece would
come Portugal, then Spain, Ireland, and Italy. These last three represent a much more substantial risk to the big banks in
Germany, France, and the United Kingdom.
On May 9, European finance ministers agreed to a stabilization fund, worth up to €500 billion, to be supplemented by
an additional €250 billion from the International Monetary Fund (which brings the total size to roughly $1 trillion).
Swap lines between the U.S. Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the Bank of England, the Bank of Canada,
and the Swiss National Bank were reopened. These moves and the size of the EU/IMF stabilization fund caught
speculators off guard – at least, for a day. A lack of details and the realization that the problems were still there soon
sent global equity markets down again. The EU/IMF plan has merely bought some time. The challenge will be to use
that time wisely. The response from global investors does not appear to be optimistic.
Aid to Greece was conditional on severe austerity moves, cuts in government pensions and wages. This led to protests
in the streets – and the television images of these protests generated more concerns, particularly among U.S. investors.
Austerity is also being self-imposed by the potential problem economies.
These countries are recovering from the global financial crisis. The last thing you want to see in a fledging recovery is
tighter fiscal policy (higher taxes, cuts in government spending). That weakens the recovery. However, the prescription
here is seen as the least-worse alternative. Financial conditions, and in turn, long-term economic growth, would be
worse if these budget problems were not addressed. The bottom line is that we’re looking at a slower pace of recovery
in Europe in the near term.
Budget issues aside, some of the worries about the euro go back to its construction. With its own currency, a country
2. could devalue, making it more competitive. With a common currency, that’s not possible. In the U.S., fiscal policy can
address downturns that are more severe in some states, but not in Europe. We could ultimately see a strong fiscal
authority in Europe, but that’s not expected anytime soon.
In general, the level of exchange rates is not a major worry for policymakers. The key issue is the speed of adjustment.
Sharp moves in the currency markets discourage global trade and investment. Intervention could provide temporary
restraint on currency movements, but would have to be a coordinated effort. Interestingly, rumors about possible
intervention were enough to check the dollar’s rise last week.
So how does the U.S. budget situation compare to Greece? Greece’s budget deficit had been projected to rise even
further as a percentage of GDP in the years ahead. In contrast, the U.S. budget deficit is expected to fall to about 3.5%
of GDP in four or five years, as the economic recovery leads to a rebound in revenues and temporary spending fades.
Longer term projections are more worrisome. Demographic issues (the retirement of the baby-boom generation) may
require minor adjustments to Social Security, but Medicare spending is projected to rise sharply (and this is nothing
new, we’ve know about the problem for many years). We need a credible plan on how to deal with the situation in the
years ahead.
State and local budgets in the U.S. remain under enormous strain, leading to tax increases and cuts in government
services (which have subtracted a few tenths of a percent from GDP growth in the last two quarters). Revenues should
improve as the economy recovers, but tough choices will have to be made over time regarding taxes and spending at
every level of government. This implies that the pace of economic growth will be somewhat lower than it would be
otherwise.
The European debt crisis is largely regional. There will be positive and negative effects on the U.S. economy – some
weakness in exports to Europe, but the flight to safety has already lowered long-term interest rates and reduced oil
prices, both of which will help aid the U.S. economic recovery.