Testimony by Christine Reilly, then executive director of the National Center for Responsible Gaming (NCRG), before the National Gambling Impact Study Commission (NGISC), November 11, 1998. The NGISC was created by federal legislation in 1996 to study the social and economic impacts of gambling in the U.S.
The National Center for Responsible Gaming's (NCRG) recommendations to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission, Feb. 9, 1999. The NGISC was created by federal legislation in 1996 to study the social and economic impacts of gambling in the U.S.
Testimony by Howard Shaffer, Ph.D., C.A.S., associate professor at Harvard Medical School and director of the Division on Addictions, before the National Gambling Impact Study Commission (NGISC) on January 22, 1998. The NGISC was created by federal legislation in 1996 to study the social and economic impacts of gambling in the U.S.
Presentation by Richard LaBrie, Ed.D., associate director for research and data analysis at the Division on Addictions at Cambrige Health Alliance. This presentation, “What Do Gaming Regulators Regulate? A Public Health Perspective on Disordered Gambling & Regulation,” was given at the North American Gaming Regulators Association (NAGRA) 2006 Annual Conference.
The National Center for Responsible Gaming's (NCRG) recommendations to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission, Feb. 9, 1999. The NGISC was created by federal legislation in 1996 to study the social and economic impacts of gambling in the U.S.
Testimony by Howard Shaffer, Ph.D., C.A.S., associate professor at Harvard Medical School and director of the Division on Addictions, before the National Gambling Impact Study Commission (NGISC) on January 22, 1998. The NGISC was created by federal legislation in 1996 to study the social and economic impacts of gambling in the U.S.
Presentation by Richard LaBrie, Ed.D., associate director for research and data analysis at the Division on Addictions at Cambrige Health Alliance. This presentation, “What Do Gaming Regulators Regulate? A Public Health Perspective on Disordered Gambling & Regulation,” was given at the North American Gaming Regulators Association (NAGRA) 2006 Annual Conference.
Screening Youth for Suicide Risk inMedical SettingsTime to.docxWilheminaRossi174
Screening Youth for Suicide Risk in
Medical Settings
Time to Ask Questions
Lisa M. Horowitz, PhD, MPH, Jeffrey A. Bridge, PhD, Maryland Pao, MD, Edwin D. Boudreaux, PhD
From the Intra
of Mental He
Pediatric Prac
dren’s Hospit
Columbus, Oh
ment of Psyc
(Boudreaux),
Massachusetts
Address co
Institute of Me
5362, Bethesda
0749-3797/
http://dx.do
S170 Am J
This paper focuses on the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention’s Research Prioritization
Task Force’s Aspirational Goal 2 (screening for suicide risk) as it pertains specifically to children,
adolescents, and young adults. Two assumptions are forwarded: (1) strategies for screening youth for
suicide risk need to be tailored developmentally; and (2) we must use instruments that were created
and tested specifically for suicide risk detection and developed specifically for youth. Recommen-
dations for shifting the current paradigm include universal suicide screening for youth in medical
settings with validated instruments.
(Am J Prev Med 2014;47(3S2):S170–S175) Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Journal of
Preventive Medicine
Introduction
Suicide remains a leading cause of death for youth
worldwide.1 Screening for risk of suicide and
suicidal behavior is an important and necessary
first step toward suicide prevention in young people.
Implementing effective screening programs involves
targeting high-risk populations in favorable settings.2
Medical settings have been designated as key venues to
screen for suicide risk and are therefore the focus of this
article.
The National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention
(Action Alliance) developed 12 Aspirational Goals as a
way of structuring a suicide prevention research agenda
aimed at decreasing suicides in the U.S. by 40% over the
next decade. Aspirational Goal 2 pertains to screening for
suicide risk: “to determine the degree of suicide risk
among individuals in diverse populations and in diverse
settings through feasible and effective screening and
assessment approaches.”3
As an adjunct to a separate article in this supplement
that proposes a paradigm shift for suicide screening
mural Research Program (Horowitz, Pao), National Institute
alth, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland; Center for Innovation in
tice (Bridge), The Research Institute at Nationwide Chil-
al and The Ohio State University College of Medicine,
io; and the Department of Emergency Medicine, Depart-
hiatry, and Department of Quantitative Health Sciences
University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester,
rrespondence to: Lisa M. Horowitz, PhD, MPH, National
ntal Health, Clinical Research Center, Building 10, Room 6-
MD 20892. E-mail: [email protected]
$36.00
i.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.06.002
Prev Med 2014;47(3S2):S170–S175 Published by E
instrument development and research aligned with this
Aspirational Goal,4 this paper focuses on suicide screen-
ing as it pertains specifically to children, adolescents, and
young adults. The aims of this paper are to desc.
Conclusions reached from my involvement with the Canadian criminal justice system. 2011.
amd- 2021
References of papers published by Dr Mansfield Mela, and others regarding FASD, PAE, Mental Health, and the Justice System.
Dr Mela is one of the very few Forensic Psychiatrists who understands and advocates for those with FASD.
Horticulture Therapy: Letting Nature Nurture
`
For more information, Please see websites below:
`
Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851214 ~
`
Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851079 ~
`
Free School Gardening Art Posters =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851348 ~
`
City Chickens for your Organic School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239850440 ~
`
Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851110 ~
50-percent of metro New York residents support legalizing recreational marijuana, but 74% expressed concern about people driving under the influence of it.
How to address privacy, ethical and regulatory issues: Examples in cognitive ...SharpBrains
How to address privacy, ethical and regulatory issues: Examples in cognitive enhancement, depression and ADHD
Dr. Karen Rommelfanger, Director of the Neuroethics Program at Emory University
Dr. Anna Wexler, Assistant Professor at the Perelman School of Medicine at UPenn
Jacqueline Studer, Senior VP and General Counsel of Akili Interactive Labs
Chaired by: Keith Epstein, Healthcare Practice Leader at Blue Heron
Slidedeck supporting presentation and discussion during the 2019 SharpBrains Virtual Summit: The Future of Brain Health (March 7-9th). Learn more at:
https://sharpbrains.com/summit-2019/
A Call to Action: Improving brain & mental health via digital platforms,...SharpBrains
(Session held at the 2014 SharpBrains Virtual Summit; October 28-30th, 2014)
8:15–9:45am. A Call to Action: Improving brain & mental health via digital platforms, neuroplasticity research and the White House BRAIN initiative
- Dr. Thomas Insel, Director of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Dr. Adam Gazzaley, Director of UCSF Neuroscience Imaging Center and Co-founder of Akili Interactive Labs
- Dr. Daphne Bavelier, Head of the Brain & Learning Lab at the University of Geneva & U. of Rochester
- Jack Young, Head of Qualcomm Life Fund
- Chair: Alvaro Fernandez, CEO of SharpBrains
Learn more here:
http://sharpbrains.com/summit-2014/agenda/
Prevalence and characteristics of adults with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder...BARRY STANLEY 2 fasd
Results
We identified a high rate of FASD (17.5, 95% CI [9.2, 25.8%]) in this sample, and this rate could have been as high as 31.2%
with confirmation of prenatal alcohol exposure. Most participants in this study presented with significant neurodevelopmental and cognitive deficits in at least two domains of functioning, irrespective of diagnosis, with only five of 80 participants (6.3%) demonstrating no cognitive impairment.
R
UNNING HEAD: JOURNAL3
Journal
Jailya Wooden
Walden University
RSCH 8360
December 17th, 2022
Since the previous entry, we have explored the evidence-based practice implementation process. “, we discussed the importance of conducting research, gathering relevant research results into actionable products, collaborating with expert opinion leaders and healthcare institutions, and transferring knowledge to end-users for adoption and implementation. We also discussed potential obstacles to adopting the evidence-based practice, such as a lack of understanding and ability to use study findings as evidence, poor time management, a lack of desire, resources, and inadequate training. We discussed ensuring that CBGT sessions are consistently held for patients suffering from a major depressive disorder.
I have faced a few challenges concerning the course and developing my research question and approach for my Final Project. For instance, one major challenge I have faced is ensuring that my research question is clearly defined and focused. It is essential to ensure that the research question is specific and that the research results are meaningful and applicable to the problem I am studying. Another challenge has been finding the right resources to use for my research. It is essential to ensure that the resources I use are reliable and up-to-date to ensure my research's accuracy and validity. Finally, I have found it challenging to keep up with the course material and ensure I am sufficiently prepared for each lesson.
The next challenge I am considering is developing a comprehensive research methodology appropriate for my research question. It is crucial to consider the scope of the research, the type of data collected, and the methods used to analyze the data (Johnson et al., 2020). I am also considering how my research project is evolving and which additional resources I need to consult to ensure the research is comprehensive and accurate. Finally, I am considering how to ensure that I stay on track and meet the deadlines for the project”.
Reference
Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D., & Chauvin, S. (2020). A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research.
American journal of pharmaceutical education,
84(1).
Week 4 discussion
Problem statement
Capital punishment is legal in the state of Texas. Since 1982, Texas has executed 578 people, with the most recent executions occurring this year (TCADP, 2022). In 2022 Texas executed 5 individuals. In the earlier years before 2004, the law permitted the execution of juveniles. However, with more controversies surrounding the execution of minors, the death penalty was revised only to affect adults – People aged 18 years and older (Holler, 2018). The impact of the death penalty on the affected parties has yet to be exhaustively researched. These include the immediate family members of the victims and other closely attached pa.
Screening Youth for Suicide Risk inMedical SettingsTime to.docxWilheminaRossi174
Screening Youth for Suicide Risk in
Medical Settings
Time to Ask Questions
Lisa M. Horowitz, PhD, MPH, Jeffrey A. Bridge, PhD, Maryland Pao, MD, Edwin D. Boudreaux, PhD
From the Intra
of Mental He
Pediatric Prac
dren’s Hospit
Columbus, Oh
ment of Psyc
(Boudreaux),
Massachusetts
Address co
Institute of Me
5362, Bethesda
0749-3797/
http://dx.do
S170 Am J
This paper focuses on the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention’s Research Prioritization
Task Force’s Aspirational Goal 2 (screening for suicide risk) as it pertains specifically to children,
adolescents, and young adults. Two assumptions are forwarded: (1) strategies for screening youth for
suicide risk need to be tailored developmentally; and (2) we must use instruments that were created
and tested specifically for suicide risk detection and developed specifically for youth. Recommen-
dations for shifting the current paradigm include universal suicide screening for youth in medical
settings with validated instruments.
(Am J Prev Med 2014;47(3S2):S170–S175) Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Journal of
Preventive Medicine
Introduction
Suicide remains a leading cause of death for youth
worldwide.1 Screening for risk of suicide and
suicidal behavior is an important and necessary
first step toward suicide prevention in young people.
Implementing effective screening programs involves
targeting high-risk populations in favorable settings.2
Medical settings have been designated as key venues to
screen for suicide risk and are therefore the focus of this
article.
The National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention
(Action Alliance) developed 12 Aspirational Goals as a
way of structuring a suicide prevention research agenda
aimed at decreasing suicides in the U.S. by 40% over the
next decade. Aspirational Goal 2 pertains to screening for
suicide risk: “to determine the degree of suicide risk
among individuals in diverse populations and in diverse
settings through feasible and effective screening and
assessment approaches.”3
As an adjunct to a separate article in this supplement
that proposes a paradigm shift for suicide screening
mural Research Program (Horowitz, Pao), National Institute
alth, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland; Center for Innovation in
tice (Bridge), The Research Institute at Nationwide Chil-
al and The Ohio State University College of Medicine,
io; and the Department of Emergency Medicine, Depart-
hiatry, and Department of Quantitative Health Sciences
University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester,
rrespondence to: Lisa M. Horowitz, PhD, MPH, National
ntal Health, Clinical Research Center, Building 10, Room 6-
MD 20892. E-mail: [email protected]
$36.00
i.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.06.002
Prev Med 2014;47(3S2):S170–S175 Published by E
instrument development and research aligned with this
Aspirational Goal,4 this paper focuses on suicide screen-
ing as it pertains specifically to children, adolescents, and
young adults. The aims of this paper are to desc.
Conclusions reached from my involvement with the Canadian criminal justice system. 2011.
amd- 2021
References of papers published by Dr Mansfield Mela, and others regarding FASD, PAE, Mental Health, and the Justice System.
Dr Mela is one of the very few Forensic Psychiatrists who understands and advocates for those with FASD.
Horticulture Therapy: Letting Nature Nurture
`
For more information, Please see websites below:
`
Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851214 ~
`
Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851079 ~
`
Free School Gardening Art Posters =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851348 ~
`
City Chickens for your Organic School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239850440 ~
`
Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851110 ~
50-percent of metro New York residents support legalizing recreational marijuana, but 74% expressed concern about people driving under the influence of it.
How to address privacy, ethical and regulatory issues: Examples in cognitive ...SharpBrains
How to address privacy, ethical and regulatory issues: Examples in cognitive enhancement, depression and ADHD
Dr. Karen Rommelfanger, Director of the Neuroethics Program at Emory University
Dr. Anna Wexler, Assistant Professor at the Perelman School of Medicine at UPenn
Jacqueline Studer, Senior VP and General Counsel of Akili Interactive Labs
Chaired by: Keith Epstein, Healthcare Practice Leader at Blue Heron
Slidedeck supporting presentation and discussion during the 2019 SharpBrains Virtual Summit: The Future of Brain Health (March 7-9th). Learn more at:
https://sharpbrains.com/summit-2019/
A Call to Action: Improving brain & mental health via digital platforms,...SharpBrains
(Session held at the 2014 SharpBrains Virtual Summit; October 28-30th, 2014)
8:15–9:45am. A Call to Action: Improving brain & mental health via digital platforms, neuroplasticity research and the White House BRAIN initiative
- Dr. Thomas Insel, Director of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Dr. Adam Gazzaley, Director of UCSF Neuroscience Imaging Center and Co-founder of Akili Interactive Labs
- Dr. Daphne Bavelier, Head of the Brain & Learning Lab at the University of Geneva & U. of Rochester
- Jack Young, Head of Qualcomm Life Fund
- Chair: Alvaro Fernandez, CEO of SharpBrains
Learn more here:
http://sharpbrains.com/summit-2014/agenda/
Prevalence and characteristics of adults with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder...BARRY STANLEY 2 fasd
Results
We identified a high rate of FASD (17.5, 95% CI [9.2, 25.8%]) in this sample, and this rate could have been as high as 31.2%
with confirmation of prenatal alcohol exposure. Most participants in this study presented with significant neurodevelopmental and cognitive deficits in at least two domains of functioning, irrespective of diagnosis, with only five of 80 participants (6.3%) demonstrating no cognitive impairment.
R
UNNING HEAD: JOURNAL3
Journal
Jailya Wooden
Walden University
RSCH 8360
December 17th, 2022
Since the previous entry, we have explored the evidence-based practice implementation process. “, we discussed the importance of conducting research, gathering relevant research results into actionable products, collaborating with expert opinion leaders and healthcare institutions, and transferring knowledge to end-users for adoption and implementation. We also discussed potential obstacles to adopting the evidence-based practice, such as a lack of understanding and ability to use study findings as evidence, poor time management, a lack of desire, resources, and inadequate training. We discussed ensuring that CBGT sessions are consistently held for patients suffering from a major depressive disorder.
I have faced a few challenges concerning the course and developing my research question and approach for my Final Project. For instance, one major challenge I have faced is ensuring that my research question is clearly defined and focused. It is essential to ensure that the research question is specific and that the research results are meaningful and applicable to the problem I am studying. Another challenge has been finding the right resources to use for my research. It is essential to ensure that the resources I use are reliable and up-to-date to ensure my research's accuracy and validity. Finally, I have found it challenging to keep up with the course material and ensure I am sufficiently prepared for each lesson.
The next challenge I am considering is developing a comprehensive research methodology appropriate for my research question. It is crucial to consider the scope of the research, the type of data collected, and the methods used to analyze the data (Johnson et al., 2020). I am also considering how my research project is evolving and which additional resources I need to consult to ensure the research is comprehensive and accurate. Finally, I am considering how to ensure that I stay on track and meet the deadlines for the project”.
Reference
Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D., & Chauvin, S. (2020). A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research.
American journal of pharmaceutical education,
84(1).
Week 4 discussion
Problem statement
Capital punishment is legal in the state of Texas. Since 1982, Texas has executed 578 people, with the most recent executions occurring this year (TCADP, 2022). In 2022 Texas executed 5 individuals. In the earlier years before 2004, the law permitted the execution of juveniles. However, with more controversies surrounding the execution of minors, the death penalty was revised only to affect adults – People aged 18 years and older (Holler, 2018). The impact of the death penalty on the affected parties has yet to be exhaustively researched. These include the immediate family members of the victims and other closely attached pa.
Similar to Testimony before the NGISC - Christine Reilly (20)
Presentation by Christine Reilly, then executive director of the Institute for Research on Gambling Disorders, at the North American Gaming Regulators Association (NAGRA) 2006 Annual Conference. Presentation focuses on research trends in the field of gambling disorders.
The Partnership for Excellence in Education and Responsible Gaming (PEER) is a one-of-a-kind program created by the National Center for Responsible Gaming (NCRG) to provide gaming entities with the tools and resources needed to develop a comprehensive and world-class responsible gaming program.
More from National Center for Responsible Gaming (9)
1. Testimony for
Christine Reilly
Executive Director
The National Center for Responsible Gaming
Before the
National Gambling Impact Study Commission
Las Vegas, Nevada
November 11, 1998
Madame Chairperson, members of the Commission, I appreciate having this
opportunity to appear before you today. Given the scope of the study assigned this body, I
believe it would be helpful for you to know what the National Center for Responsible
Gaming (NCRG) is about and how our work might be of use to you in your deliberations.
The National Center for Responsible Gaming was founded in 1996 to fund research on
problem, pathological and underage gambling. The NCRG is a division of the Gaming
Entertainment Research and Education Foundation (GEREF), a separately incorporated,
independent, nonprofit organization classified as a 501 (c) (3) by the IRS. It is affiliated
with the University of Missouri-Kansas City, which provides office space and services to
the NCRG.
Twenty-two casino operators and gaming suppliers and one foundation have pledged
$4.9 million to the NCRG, an unprecedented level of support for research on disordered
gambling behavior.i In fact, ours is the first national organization devoted exclusively to
funding scientific, peer-reviewed research on this disorder.
Major questions remain unanswered about the nature of gambling-related disorders:
Is pathological gambling a primary disorder? Or, is it sometimes a
consequence of the other mental health problems so frequently seen in
pathological gamblers?
Why is there a high rate of comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders
and addictions?
Are the current diagnostic and screening instruments accurate?
Does gambling at an early age predispose a person to have a gambling
problem in adulthood?
What role does genetics play in the onset of a pathological gambling
disorder?
Such fundamental questions must be answered before we can develop effective
prevention and treatment strategies. The NCRG’s mission is to provide the necessary
financial support to the institutions that have the resources and expertise to investigate
and resolve these questions. Because of the parallels often drawn with research sponsored
by the tobacco industry, I want to emphasize that the NCRG does not conduct its own
2. research. Our operations consist of a two-person administrative office that coordinates a
competitive grants program designed to attract proposals from the highest caliber
research universities and medical centers.
Before the establishment of the National Center for Responsible Gaming, there was no
funding source--no foundation, no research organization, and no federal agency--focused
on problem gambling research. Consequently, the field was under-funded and under-
developed. Moreover, much of the research that had been conducted on problem
gambling was not scientifically sound. It was not peer-reviewed and did not follow
rigorous standards in the collection and interpretation of data. That is why the NCRG is
dedicated to creating a field of disordered gambling research and a pool of outstanding
researchers committed to the pursuit of scientific excellence.
To that end, we have assembled a distinguished Board of Directors that includes
members such as Dr. Louis Sullivan, President of the Morehouse School of Medicine and
former U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services; Dr. Howard Shaffer, Director of
the Division on Addictions at Harvard Medical School; Carol O’Hare, Executive Director
of the Nevada Council on Problem Gambling; and Sue Cox, Executive Director of the
Texas Council on Problem and Compulsive Gambling. Our bylaws state that at least 50
percent of the governing board must represent sectors other than the gaming industry.
Furthermore, the Board of Directors does not select the research projects supported by
the NCRG. It has delegated this authority to peer review panels and the NCRG’s
Advisory Board. These independent bodies are composed of nationally recognized
scientists such as Dr. Fred Goodwin, former director of the National Institute of Mental
Health and the current director of the Center on Neuroscience, Medical Progress &
Society at George Washington University Medical Center; Dr. Richard Evans,
Distinguished University Professor of Psychology at the University of Houston; Dr. Mark
Appelbaum, Professor of Psychology at the University of California-San Diego and
editor of the journal Psychological Methods; and Dr. David Self, Assistant Professor of
Psychiatry at Yale University School of Medicine. These distinguished researchers follow
the high standards and peer review procedures of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
in evaluating grant proposals submitted to the NCRG.
In fact, we have modeled our organizational structure and decision-making procedures
on the NIH as you can see in the chart included in the packet of materials about the
NCRG.
Since its recent establishment, the NCRG has awarded 11 grants totaling nearly $1.5
million. These research projects are led by an outstanding group of scientists representing
the leading university and medical research centers in North America, including Harvard
Medical School and the City of Hope National Medical Center.
We hold a very high opinion of NCRG’s investigators, an opinion that is shared by
many of the most prestigious academic bodies in the country, including one employed by
the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. The National Research Council
(NRC) of the National Academy of Sciences has been engaged by the Commission to
study the social and economic impact of pathological gambling. This past year, the NRC
3. convened groups of leading experts in the field to address the committee. Ten of the
presenters selected by the NRC serve as key personnel on NCRG-funded research
projects: Robert Ladouceur, Universitie Laval; Peter Goyer and William Semple, VA
Medical Center Cleveland; Howard Shaffer, Harvard Medical School; Ken Winters,
University of Minnesota; David Comings, City of Hope National Medical Center; Randy
Stinchfield and Roger Svendsen, Minnesota Institute of Public Health; Tony Toneatto,
Addiction Research Foundation; and Lori Rugle, Trimeridian.
The National Research Council has drawn on the NCRG’s work in other ways. The
committee requested, and was granted, permission to use the database created by Harvard
Medical School for its study of the prevalence of disordered gambling. I believe that you
are aware of Dr. Howard Shaffer’s groundbreaking work, "Estimating the Prevalence of
Disordered Gambling Behavior in the United States and Canada: A Meta-analysis." The
Harvard study was the first research project supported by NCRG. It not only provided the
first reliable estimates of the prevalence of the disorder but also set new and more
rigorous standards for future prevalence studies. To date, NCRG has filled nearly 2,000
requests for copies of this study.
The NCRG’s Advisory Board determined at the outset that the complexity of
disordered gambling behavior requires investigations from a variety of disciplines and
established three main areas of inquiry for support: epidemiology, neuroscience, and
behavioral and social science.
Epidemiology is the scientific methodology for discerning the characteristics of a
disorder and the characteristics of those who suffer from the disorder. In this
domain, the NCRG continued the original grant to Harvard Medical School so
that researchers, public policy makers, and the public will have access to the most
up-to-date estimates of the prevalence of the disorder among both the adult
general population and special populations such as youth.
Neuroscience research in mental health is now exploring the role that
neurobiology plays in mood disorders and addictions through brain imaging, drug
trials and genetics studies. NCRG is currently funding neuroscience research
projects at the City of Hope National Medical Center, the Foundation for Clinical
Neuroscience Research and Education, the University of New Mexico, and the
University of Minnesota School of Medicine. The findings of such cutting-edge
research will have an enormous impact on how we define the disorder, how we
diagnose it, how we measure its prevalence, and how we treat it. It may also offer
clues to the roots of other addictive disorders. Perhaps most significantly, the
neuroscience research will reveal biological markers of the disorder that will give
us a gold standard against which the accuracy of screening and diagnostic
instruments can be measured. For example, we do not have independent
validation of the criteria used to diagnose pathological gambling in the American
Psychiatric Association’s DSM-IV. Neuroscience research will soon provide this
gold standard.
Recognizing that the environment also plays a crucial role in mental health
disorders, the NCRG has committed funds to research in the behavioral and
social sciences. We are currently financing experiments that will assess the
efficacy of various treatment programs such as cognitive therapy. Two projects are
4. looking at the dynamics of youth gambling, especially risk factors for developing
the disorder at an early age. One investigator is interested in whether young
people involved in gambling "mature-out" in the same way that most teenagers
move away from risky behaviors such as alcohol and drug abuse when they reach
adulthood. This research will serve as the foundation for future prevention
programs. I am sure that we all agree that prevention is ultimately the most
effective form of treatment.
The NCRG’s next round of grant competition will occur in the spring of 1999. The
Advisory Board recently reviewed 79 letters of intent and selected 49 projects to be
submitted as full proposals on January 4, 1999. We expect to award a minimum of $1.2
million during this next competition. The Request for Applications that solicited these
proposals emphasized our special interest in youth gambling, prevention, and
neuroscience.
One of our original objectives for the NCRG was to serve as a catalyst by encouraging
other funders to support disordered gambling research. We are very proud to have already
achieved this objective with the recent announcement of the first ever-funding initiative
on pathological gambling by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The NCRG played a
role in this development by demonstrating the enormous potential of the field for not only
understanding pathological gambling, but also for illuminating addictive disorders in
general.
Because continuing dialogue with NIH is vital to fulfilling our mandate, the NCRG
will cosponsor a one-day conference with George Washington University Medical Center
in Washington, D.C. on February 5, 1999. All of the NCRG’s investigators will convene,
for the first time, to discuss their research. The conference will feature a keynote address
by Dr. Alan Leshner, Director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, "Addiction is a
Brain Disease and It Matters." We believe that it is in the interest of both the NIH and
NCRG to discuss future collaboration and, therefore, have planned sessions for NCRG
investigators to converse with the staff from the NIH institutes involved in the
pathological gambling initiative. The conference will also introduce the work of the
NCRG to foundations that support mental health and addiction research and will feature
breakout session for special interests such as journalists who cover mental health,
science, and gambling issues.
Madame Chairperson, the National Center for Responsible Gaming is creating a field
of disordered gambling research that is gaining the respect and attracting the participation
of the scientific community. Earlier this year, pioneer gambling researcher, Dr. Rachel
Volberg, informed this Commission that,
Gambling researchers who have been in the field for a while have been calling for some
kind of effort to fund research for many years. The NCRG is the first effort that we've
seen, and I absolutely have to applaud the casino industry for coming up with that
particular method, it's a peer reviewed, scientifically sound way of getting research
done…ii
5. As we all know, valid, peer-reviewed, verifiable research and study conducted on
problem and pathological gambling is critical to informed policy development in the area
of gaming. Only the strongest science, not anecdotal evidence, should be accepted. We
need scientists of the highest caliber working on this problem to ensure that the most
rigorous science will guide our efforts to prevent and treat this disorder.
We are proud of the many contributions that NCRG has made and hope that the
National Gambling Impact Study Commission will use the NCRG as a resource. We are
pleased to extend a special invitation to the members and staff of the Commission to
participate in our conference on February 5, 1999. We look forward to such opportunities
for continuing this important dialogue.
Thank you for your attention. I will be pleased to answer any of your questions about
the NCRG.
i
The NCRG’s current donors include founding contributors Boyd Gaming Corporation and Station Casinos,
Inc.; and Caesars World, Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc., Grand Casinos, Inc. Hilton Hotels Corporation,
International Game Technology, the Lincy Foundation, and Mirage Resorts. Other donors include Aztar
Corporation, Boomtown, Inc., Casino Data Systems, Inc., Coast Resorts, Empress Riverboat Casinos, Inc.,
Harrah’s Entertainment, Harvey’s Resort, Hollywood Casino Corporation, Horseshoe Gaming, Mission
Industries, Rio Suite Hotel & Casino, Showboat, Inc., Shuffle Master Gaming, Inc. Southern Wine &
Spirits.
ii
Rachel Volberg, Public meeting of the National Gambling Impact Study Commission (January 22, 1998).