The student generates designs for a problem, plans how to create a solution, and produces a product. Higher scores are earned by more thoroughly investigating the problem, designing multiple feasible solutions, planning with detailed logical steps, and competently creating the solution while justifying any design modifications. The highest scores require critically evaluating information, designs, and plans as well as broadly testing the solution against the original specifications.
Technology assessment criteria of 7th grade02Toño Medina
The document outlines technology assessment criteria for a 7th grade class. It includes 6 levels of achievement across 4 criteria: A) Investigate, B) Design, C) Plan, and D) Create. For each criteria, it describes the tasks and level of detail expected to receive higher point values, with 6 points requiring the most comprehensive work that critically analyzes information and fully justifies decisions.
This document outlines a 5-day lesson plan on scientific notation for the first quarter. The goal is for learners to understand and apply scientific notation. Key concepts include expressing big and small quantities in scientific notation and using it to solve real-life problems. Learners will demonstrate their understanding by formulating problems involving scientific notation from disciplines like astronomy and solving them. A performance task involves designing a scale model of the solar system using scientific notation to express planetary distances. The lesson uses introduction, interaction with resources, and integration to address the essential question of why scientific notation is used.
Assessment model in consideration of self selection in building design perfor...ar_mahdi
This document outlines a research proposal to assess consideration of self-selection in building design performance. The research aims to investigate building design performance criteria and metrics of self-selection, evaluate the correlation between self-selection and building design criteria, and establish an assessment model. A literature review and data collection methods like surveys and discussions are proposed. The significance is that it could introduce new building design criteria and provide an assessment model of self-selection in building design.
Value chain analysis describes how a business is divided into primary and support activities and how these activities contribute to competitive advantage. Primary activities directly involve creating and delivering a product or service, like operations, marketing, and service. Support activities indirectly support primary activities, like procurement, human resources, and technology development. Michael Porter's model of value chain analysis provides a framework to examine how each activity creates value and where a business has competitive advantages or disadvantages.
The document discusses State Bank of India, the largest nationalized commercial bank in India. It provides information on SBI's headquarters, employees, delivery channels, marketing and sales activities, revenue streams, supporting activities like human resource management and technology deployment. It also presents a SWOT analysis, highlighting strengths like its brand name and distribution network, weaknesses such as high non-performing assets, opportunities in financial inclusion and rural India, and threats from increased competition.
The Value of Critique and Integrating it into Your Design ProcessAdam Connor
Slides from my presentation with Alla Zollers at Boston UPA's 2010 Conference
Foe an updated version of this presentation please see: http://www.slideshare.net/adamconnor/ready-set-critique
The document discusses critique as a way to provide structured feedback on designs. It defines critique as feedback focused on what works and doesn't work in a design and why, from the perspective of users and goals. Critique is valuable for designers as it helps them examine designs objectively and get new ideas. When incorporated into the design process, critique allows for collaboration and helps establish frameworks for discussion. The document provides tips for planning and running effective critique sessions, such as setting clear goals and time limits. It also discusses incorporating critique into both traditional and agile project lifecycles.
The document provides instructions for students to complete a video blogging assignment. It outlines the design cycle process they must follow, including investigating existing video blogs, planning their own blog, creating it, and evaluating it. Key requirements are that the video blog be instructional, use only original content and footage shot by the student, and be edited using specified software. Production equipment, timeline, and assessment criteria are also outlined.
Technology assessment criteria of 7th grade02Toño Medina
The document outlines technology assessment criteria for a 7th grade class. It includes 6 levels of achievement across 4 criteria: A) Investigate, B) Design, C) Plan, and D) Create. For each criteria, it describes the tasks and level of detail expected to receive higher point values, with 6 points requiring the most comprehensive work that critically analyzes information and fully justifies decisions.
This document outlines a 5-day lesson plan on scientific notation for the first quarter. The goal is for learners to understand and apply scientific notation. Key concepts include expressing big and small quantities in scientific notation and using it to solve real-life problems. Learners will demonstrate their understanding by formulating problems involving scientific notation from disciplines like astronomy and solving them. A performance task involves designing a scale model of the solar system using scientific notation to express planetary distances. The lesson uses introduction, interaction with resources, and integration to address the essential question of why scientific notation is used.
Assessment model in consideration of self selection in building design perfor...ar_mahdi
This document outlines a research proposal to assess consideration of self-selection in building design performance. The research aims to investigate building design performance criteria and metrics of self-selection, evaluate the correlation between self-selection and building design criteria, and establish an assessment model. A literature review and data collection methods like surveys and discussions are proposed. The significance is that it could introduce new building design criteria and provide an assessment model of self-selection in building design.
Value chain analysis describes how a business is divided into primary and support activities and how these activities contribute to competitive advantage. Primary activities directly involve creating and delivering a product or service, like operations, marketing, and service. Support activities indirectly support primary activities, like procurement, human resources, and technology development. Michael Porter's model of value chain analysis provides a framework to examine how each activity creates value and where a business has competitive advantages or disadvantages.
The document discusses State Bank of India, the largest nationalized commercial bank in India. It provides information on SBI's headquarters, employees, delivery channels, marketing and sales activities, revenue streams, supporting activities like human resource management and technology deployment. It also presents a SWOT analysis, highlighting strengths like its brand name and distribution network, weaknesses such as high non-performing assets, opportunities in financial inclusion and rural India, and threats from increased competition.
The Value of Critique and Integrating it into Your Design ProcessAdam Connor
Slides from my presentation with Alla Zollers at Boston UPA's 2010 Conference
Foe an updated version of this presentation please see: http://www.slideshare.net/adamconnor/ready-set-critique
The document discusses critique as a way to provide structured feedback on designs. It defines critique as feedback focused on what works and doesn't work in a design and why, from the perspective of users and goals. Critique is valuable for designers as it helps them examine designs objectively and get new ideas. When incorporated into the design process, critique allows for collaboration and helps establish frameworks for discussion. The document provides tips for planning and running effective critique sessions, such as setting clear goals and time limits. It also discusses incorporating critique into both traditional and agile project lifecycles.
The document provides instructions for students to complete a video blogging assignment. It outlines the design cycle process they must follow, including investigating existing video blogs, planning their own blog, creating it, and evaluating it. Key requirements are that the video blog be instructional, use only original content and footage shot by the student, and be edited using specified software. Production equipment, timeline, and assessment criteria are also outlined.
This rubric evaluates students on critical thinking skills in four areas: analyze, compare and contrast, problem solving, and evaluation. For each area, students can perform at an unsatisfactory, proficient, or advanced level. At the proficient level, students use models and explanations to analyze systems, identify relationships, compare similarities and differences, apply knowledge to solve problems, and evaluate work based on criteria. At the advanced level, students differentiate concepts, determine reasons for similarities and differences, consider cross-curricular knowledge, identify significant questions, and provide detailed feedback. The rubric is used to assess student performance on a scale from 0 to 10.
Designing and Conducting Summative EvaluationsTenmiles
The document discusses summative evaluation, which is used to make "go-no-go" decisions about instructional materials and judge their impact. Summative evaluations typically have two main phases - an expert judgment phase where experts analyze the materials' congruence with organizational needs, content, design, and feasibility, and a field trial phase where the materials' effectiveness is tested with target learners. The document contrasts summative evaluations, which are usually conducted by external evaluators, with formative evaluations, which aim to improve instruction and are conducted by internal evaluators.
Standards Based Assessment for the CTE Classroomccpc
Karen Nelson
Assistant Director, Curriculum & Instruction
Los Angeles County ROP
Downey, CA
Sarah Vielma
Consultant, Business Occupations
Los Angeles County ROP
Downey, CA
Herb Smith
Graphics Instructor
La Crescenta High School
La Crescenta, CA
Linking teaching and learning to test scores is of critical importance as career technical education demonstrates standards based instruction and support of academic standards through assessment. This workshop will provide an overview of a process to increase student achievement through instructional change.
This document outlines the assessment criteria for the MYP Technology program. It describes 6 criteria (A-F) that students will be assessed on: Investigate, Design, Plan, Create, Evaluate, and Attitudes. Each criterion includes achievement levels from 0-6 and level descriptors explaining the requirements to achieve each level. The highest levels require more independence, breadth, depth, and rigor in researching problems, designing solutions, planning projects, creating products, evaluating outcomes, and demonstrating positive attitudes.
The document outlines the six assessment criteria for a technology project in MYP 3: Investigation, Design, Plan, Creation, Evaluation, and Attitudes in Technology. Each criterion is assigned a maximum score of 6 and described at varying levels of achievement from 0 to 6. The criteria focus on the stages of the project including investigating problems, designing solutions, planning production, creating an end product, and evaluating the process and results.
The document outlines the six assessment criteria for a technology project in MYP 3: Investigation, Design, Plan, Creation, Evaluation, and Attitudes in Technology. Each criterion is assigned a maximum score of 6 and described at varying levels of achievement from 0 to 6. The criteria focus on the stages of the project including investigating problems, designing solutions, planning production, creating an end product, and evaluating the process and results.
Business acl ii _core_hr_&_tm_assignment_asabyasachiroy
The document is an assignment for an HR executive at Marigold, an Indian FMCG company. [1] The company wants to increase soap sales by 5% and detergent sales by 5% for the coming year. [2] To achieve this, Marigold plans to recruit 30 new salespeople, including 6 senior managers and 24 middle to junior executives. [3] The assignment tasks the HR executive with designing a manpower plan, recruitment plan, and initial screening matrix to hire the new salespeople by Diwali to maximize profits.
The document outlines the six assessment criteria for a technology project in MYP 3:
1) Investigation, which evaluates a student's investigation of the problem and sources.
2) Design, which evaluates a student's generation and justification of design(s).
3) Plan, which evaluates a student's production and evaluation of a project plan.
4) Creation, which evaluates a student's implementation of techniques, equipment, and plan.
5) Evaluation, which evaluates a student's objective evaluation of the product/solution and own performance.
6) Attitudes in technology, which evaluates a student's attitudes toward technology.
Standards-based instruction focuses on content and performance standards that define what students should know and be able to do at each grade level. Content standards provide broad statements about skills, while performance standards provide specific grade-level expectations and examples. In a standards-based classroom, essential questions are posed related to the standards, a variety of resources are used by both teachers and students, and students are actively engaged in performance tasks directly linked to real-world applications of the standards. Standards-based instruction changes assessment practices to be more authentic and uses assessments to guide lesson planning and differentiate instruction. High-achieving schools that implement standards-based instruction have attributes like high expectations, personalized learning, respect and responsibility, collaboration time, performance-
Technology assessment criteria of 9th grade03Toño Medina
This document outlines the criteria and scoring rubric for assessing 9th grade students' technology projects. It evaluates students on 6 criteria: investigating problems, designing solutions, planning projects, creating products, evaluating outcomes, and displaying proper attitudes. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to define performance levels from 1 to 6 points. The highest levels involve thorough, critical thinking at each stage and justify choices made. The rubric aims to holistically assess the design process and students' personal engagement and teamwork skills.
Storytelling: Rhetoric of heuristic evaluationUX Firm, LLC
This document discusses the history and evolution of the author's approach to heuristic evaluation. It began with strictly following Nielsen's 10 heuristics, then incorporated more descriptive findings using tables, screenshots and recommendations. The author's terminology and perspective shifted to more of a user experience focus over time, using concepts like user frustration in findings. The approach also began incorporating direct user comments and feedback to enhance the evaluations.
The document outlines the six assessment criteria for a MYP 3 technology project: investigation, design, plan, creation, evaluation, and attitudes in technology. Each criterion is scored from 0 to 6, with descriptors provided for performance levels 1-2, 3-4, and 5-6 to describe what is required to achieve that score. The criteria focus on stages of the project including investigating problems, designing solutions, planning production, creating an outcome, and evaluating the results and process.
This document provides an overview of prototyping for software development. It defines prototyping as using simplified models to explore design ideas, requirements, and functionality. Prototyping benefits include verifying assumptions, clarifying requirements, identifying issues early, and minimizing risks. The document outlines best practices for prototyping, including following a process of planning, preparation, design, results, and deployment. This process involves verifying requirements, defining users, developing task flows, determining prototype characteristics, and reviewing and validating the design.
This document discusses learning goals and success criteria. It defines learning goals as clearly identifying what students are expected to know and be able to do, while success criteria describe what successful attainment of the learning goals looks like. Success criteria are co-constructed with students based on examples of strong student work and are used to provide descriptive feedback to help students improve. The document emphasizes establishing learning goals and success criteria, identifying student progress, and adapting instruction based on assessment.
Storytelling the Results of Heuristic EvaluationUXPA Boston
This interactive talk focuses on the UX tool of heuristic evaluation (or expert review) and best practices for designing and reporting the results of this review. Audience members will be prompted to share their experiences in conducting reviews and reporting them. A straw poll will indicate how many follow a standard set of heuristics and how many do something else. Discussion of the whys and why nots will set the stage for focusing on how to report the results. A brief walk through the evolution of reporting from the checklist to the narrative will be reviewed with examples from reports to prompt audience stories of their process and its effectiveness. New UX practitioners and students, as well as seasoned veterans, will have the chance to defend their approach or perhaps be persuaded to change.
This document provides assessment criteria for achieving excellence in a level 3 photography portfolio. To meet the criteria, a student must:
1. Use drawing as the central means to purposefully generate a range and depth of ideas to analyze, clarify and regenerate options.
2. Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of established photography processes, materials, and techniques, and apply these skills fluently and purposefully.
3. Systematically relate, evaluate, and synthesize a range of ideas and methods in producing original work.
4. Understand and build upon a depth of ideas and methods through multiple references, and use these insights to produce innovative and distinctive photographic works.
The document assigns four teams to research and report on the classroom guidelines of different European and North American countries, with Team 1 studying Switzerland and Norway, Team 2 examining Denmark and the Netherlands, Team 3 investigating Italy and France, and Team 4 looking into the classroom guidelines of Canada and Portugal.
The document lists the names of 10 people divided into 5 teams. Team 1 includes Selene María Luisa Artola Acevedo, Eder Fernando Delgado Martínez, and Bertha Alicia Guajardo Martinez. Team 2 includes Andrea De León Chapa, José Manuel Escobedo Pérez, and Debanhi Jimenez Reyes. Team 3 includes Isidro de Jesus Garcia Rodriguez, Gabriela Elizabeth Almanza Castillo, and Andrés Flores Quintanilla. Team 4 includes Emmitt A. Velazquez Velazquez, Alondra Jazmín Caballero Olivares, and Aldo Treviño Cabrera. Team 5 includes Carolina Yá
Este documento lista los nombres de 10 equipos de 5 personas cada uno para un total de 50 nombres. Los equipos están enumerados del 1 al 5 con los nombres de cada miembro del equipo en una fila separada debajo del número y título del equipo correspondiente.
Este documento presenta la composición de 6 equipos de trabajo. Cada equipo está compuesto por 4 personas y se enumeran sus nombres completos. Los equipos están numerados del 1 al 6 y cada miembro se lista debajo con su nombre y apellidos.
El documento lista los nombres de los integrantes de 5 equipos diferentes. El Equipo 1 está formado por Miguel Cervera Sánchez, Edna Chapa Quezada y Brenda Lozano Lozano. El Equipo 2 incluye a Imelda Coronado Garza, Sofía Fernanda Cuevas Méndez y Gerardo Farías Gonzalez.
More Related Content
Similar to Technology assessment criteria of 8th grade03
This rubric evaluates students on critical thinking skills in four areas: analyze, compare and contrast, problem solving, and evaluation. For each area, students can perform at an unsatisfactory, proficient, or advanced level. At the proficient level, students use models and explanations to analyze systems, identify relationships, compare similarities and differences, apply knowledge to solve problems, and evaluate work based on criteria. At the advanced level, students differentiate concepts, determine reasons for similarities and differences, consider cross-curricular knowledge, identify significant questions, and provide detailed feedback. The rubric is used to assess student performance on a scale from 0 to 10.
Designing and Conducting Summative EvaluationsTenmiles
The document discusses summative evaluation, which is used to make "go-no-go" decisions about instructional materials and judge their impact. Summative evaluations typically have two main phases - an expert judgment phase where experts analyze the materials' congruence with organizational needs, content, design, and feasibility, and a field trial phase where the materials' effectiveness is tested with target learners. The document contrasts summative evaluations, which are usually conducted by external evaluators, with formative evaluations, which aim to improve instruction and are conducted by internal evaluators.
Standards Based Assessment for the CTE Classroomccpc
Karen Nelson
Assistant Director, Curriculum & Instruction
Los Angeles County ROP
Downey, CA
Sarah Vielma
Consultant, Business Occupations
Los Angeles County ROP
Downey, CA
Herb Smith
Graphics Instructor
La Crescenta High School
La Crescenta, CA
Linking teaching and learning to test scores is of critical importance as career technical education demonstrates standards based instruction and support of academic standards through assessment. This workshop will provide an overview of a process to increase student achievement through instructional change.
This document outlines the assessment criteria for the MYP Technology program. It describes 6 criteria (A-F) that students will be assessed on: Investigate, Design, Plan, Create, Evaluate, and Attitudes. Each criterion includes achievement levels from 0-6 and level descriptors explaining the requirements to achieve each level. The highest levels require more independence, breadth, depth, and rigor in researching problems, designing solutions, planning projects, creating products, evaluating outcomes, and demonstrating positive attitudes.
The document outlines the six assessment criteria for a technology project in MYP 3: Investigation, Design, Plan, Creation, Evaluation, and Attitudes in Technology. Each criterion is assigned a maximum score of 6 and described at varying levels of achievement from 0 to 6. The criteria focus on the stages of the project including investigating problems, designing solutions, planning production, creating an end product, and evaluating the process and results.
The document outlines the six assessment criteria for a technology project in MYP 3: Investigation, Design, Plan, Creation, Evaluation, and Attitudes in Technology. Each criterion is assigned a maximum score of 6 and described at varying levels of achievement from 0 to 6. The criteria focus on the stages of the project including investigating problems, designing solutions, planning production, creating an end product, and evaluating the process and results.
Business acl ii _core_hr_&_tm_assignment_asabyasachiroy
The document is an assignment for an HR executive at Marigold, an Indian FMCG company. [1] The company wants to increase soap sales by 5% and detergent sales by 5% for the coming year. [2] To achieve this, Marigold plans to recruit 30 new salespeople, including 6 senior managers and 24 middle to junior executives. [3] The assignment tasks the HR executive with designing a manpower plan, recruitment plan, and initial screening matrix to hire the new salespeople by Diwali to maximize profits.
The document outlines the six assessment criteria for a technology project in MYP 3:
1) Investigation, which evaluates a student's investigation of the problem and sources.
2) Design, which evaluates a student's generation and justification of design(s).
3) Plan, which evaluates a student's production and evaluation of a project plan.
4) Creation, which evaluates a student's implementation of techniques, equipment, and plan.
5) Evaluation, which evaluates a student's objective evaluation of the product/solution and own performance.
6) Attitudes in technology, which evaluates a student's attitudes toward technology.
Standards-based instruction focuses on content and performance standards that define what students should know and be able to do at each grade level. Content standards provide broad statements about skills, while performance standards provide specific grade-level expectations and examples. In a standards-based classroom, essential questions are posed related to the standards, a variety of resources are used by both teachers and students, and students are actively engaged in performance tasks directly linked to real-world applications of the standards. Standards-based instruction changes assessment practices to be more authentic and uses assessments to guide lesson planning and differentiate instruction. High-achieving schools that implement standards-based instruction have attributes like high expectations, personalized learning, respect and responsibility, collaboration time, performance-
Technology assessment criteria of 9th grade03Toño Medina
This document outlines the criteria and scoring rubric for assessing 9th grade students' technology projects. It evaluates students on 6 criteria: investigating problems, designing solutions, planning projects, creating products, evaluating outcomes, and displaying proper attitudes. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to define performance levels from 1 to 6 points. The highest levels involve thorough, critical thinking at each stage and justify choices made. The rubric aims to holistically assess the design process and students' personal engagement and teamwork skills.
Storytelling: Rhetoric of heuristic evaluationUX Firm, LLC
This document discusses the history and evolution of the author's approach to heuristic evaluation. It began with strictly following Nielsen's 10 heuristics, then incorporated more descriptive findings using tables, screenshots and recommendations. The author's terminology and perspective shifted to more of a user experience focus over time, using concepts like user frustration in findings. The approach also began incorporating direct user comments and feedback to enhance the evaluations.
The document outlines the six assessment criteria for a MYP 3 technology project: investigation, design, plan, creation, evaluation, and attitudes in technology. Each criterion is scored from 0 to 6, with descriptors provided for performance levels 1-2, 3-4, and 5-6 to describe what is required to achieve that score. The criteria focus on stages of the project including investigating problems, designing solutions, planning production, creating an outcome, and evaluating the results and process.
This document provides an overview of prototyping for software development. It defines prototyping as using simplified models to explore design ideas, requirements, and functionality. Prototyping benefits include verifying assumptions, clarifying requirements, identifying issues early, and minimizing risks. The document outlines best practices for prototyping, including following a process of planning, preparation, design, results, and deployment. This process involves verifying requirements, defining users, developing task flows, determining prototype characteristics, and reviewing and validating the design.
This document discusses learning goals and success criteria. It defines learning goals as clearly identifying what students are expected to know and be able to do, while success criteria describe what successful attainment of the learning goals looks like. Success criteria are co-constructed with students based on examples of strong student work and are used to provide descriptive feedback to help students improve. The document emphasizes establishing learning goals and success criteria, identifying student progress, and adapting instruction based on assessment.
Storytelling the Results of Heuristic EvaluationUXPA Boston
This interactive talk focuses on the UX tool of heuristic evaluation (or expert review) and best practices for designing and reporting the results of this review. Audience members will be prompted to share their experiences in conducting reviews and reporting them. A straw poll will indicate how many follow a standard set of heuristics and how many do something else. Discussion of the whys and why nots will set the stage for focusing on how to report the results. A brief walk through the evolution of reporting from the checklist to the narrative will be reviewed with examples from reports to prompt audience stories of their process and its effectiveness. New UX practitioners and students, as well as seasoned veterans, will have the chance to defend their approach or perhaps be persuaded to change.
This document provides assessment criteria for achieving excellence in a level 3 photography portfolio. To meet the criteria, a student must:
1. Use drawing as the central means to purposefully generate a range and depth of ideas to analyze, clarify and regenerate options.
2. Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of established photography processes, materials, and techniques, and apply these skills fluently and purposefully.
3. Systematically relate, evaluate, and synthesize a range of ideas and methods in producing original work.
4. Understand and build upon a depth of ideas and methods through multiple references, and use these insights to produce innovative and distinctive photographic works.
Similar to Technology assessment criteria of 8th grade03 (16)
The document assigns four teams to research and report on the classroom guidelines of different European and North American countries, with Team 1 studying Switzerland and Norway, Team 2 examining Denmark and the Netherlands, Team 3 investigating Italy and France, and Team 4 looking into the classroom guidelines of Canada and Portugal.
The document lists the names of 10 people divided into 5 teams. Team 1 includes Selene María Luisa Artola Acevedo, Eder Fernando Delgado Martínez, and Bertha Alicia Guajardo Martinez. Team 2 includes Andrea De León Chapa, José Manuel Escobedo Pérez, and Debanhi Jimenez Reyes. Team 3 includes Isidro de Jesus Garcia Rodriguez, Gabriela Elizabeth Almanza Castillo, and Andrés Flores Quintanilla. Team 4 includes Emmitt A. Velazquez Velazquez, Alondra Jazmín Caballero Olivares, and Aldo Treviño Cabrera. Team 5 includes Carolina Yá
Este documento lista los nombres de 10 equipos de 5 personas cada uno para un total de 50 nombres. Los equipos están enumerados del 1 al 5 con los nombres de cada miembro del equipo en una fila separada debajo del número y título del equipo correspondiente.
Este documento presenta la composición de 6 equipos de trabajo. Cada equipo está compuesto por 4 personas y se enumeran sus nombres completos. Los equipos están numerados del 1 al 6 y cada miembro se lista debajo con su nombre y apellidos.
El documento lista los nombres de los integrantes de 5 equipos diferentes. El Equipo 1 está formado por Miguel Cervera Sánchez, Edna Chapa Quezada y Brenda Lozano Lozano. El Equipo 2 incluye a Imelda Coronado Garza, Sofía Fernanda Cuevas Méndez y Gerardo Farías Gonzalez.
Este documento lista los nombres de 10 equipos de estudiantes divididos en 5 grupos. Cada equipo contiene de 2 a 5 estudiantes con sus nombres completos.
Your blog is personalized and has completed all activities. It has a picture of you from Gravatar, an "About Me" page with information and another picture. All activities from the session are uploaded in the same "Technology Bim. 1" entry and categorized as "Assessment". The PowerPoint, videos, Excel file and self-evaluation are uploaded as posts with required attributes. Your comment on the assessment page includes all needed information and the assessment was finished in under 50 minutes.
Your blog is personalized and has completed all activities. It has a picture of you from Gravatar, an "About Me" page with information and another picture. All activities from the session are uploaded in the same "Technology Bim. 1" entry and categorized as "Assessment". The PowerPoint, videos, Excel file and self-evaluation are uploaded as posts with required attributes. Your comment on the assessment page includes all needed information and the assessment was finished in under 50 minutes.
Your blog is personalized and has completed all activities. It has a picture of you from Gravatar, an "About Me" page with information and another picture. All activities from the session are uploaded in the same "Technology Bim. 1" entry and categorized as "Assessment". The PowerPoint, videos, Excel file and self-evaluation are uploaded as individual posts with required attributes. Your comment on the assessment page includes all needed information and the assessment was finished in under 50 minutes.
Your blog is personalized and has completed all activities. It has a picture of you from Gravatar, an "About Me" page with information and another picture. All activities from the session are uploaded in the same "Technology Bim. 1" entry and categorized as "Assessment". The PowerPoint, videos, Excel file and self-evaluation are uploaded as posts with required attributes. Your comment on the assessment page includes all needed information and the assessment was finished in under 50 minutes.
Your blog is personalized and has completed all activities. It has a picture of you from Gravatar, an "About Me" page with information and another picture. All activities from the session are uploaded in the same "Technology Bim. 1" entry and categorized as "Assessment". The PowerPoint is uploaded as the first post with full presentation features. Videos are the second post in order and properly sized. The Excel file is the third post without links or changes. Your self-evaluation and comment were also posted and your assessment finished in under 50 minutes.
Your blog is personalized and has completed all activities. It has a picture of you from Gravatar, an "About Me" page with information and another picture. All activities from the session are uploaded in the same "Technology Bim. 1" entry and categorized as "Assessment". The PowerPoint, videos, Excel file and self-evaluation are uploaded as posts with required attributes. Your comment on the assessment page includes all needed information and the assessment was finished in under 50 minutes.
Your blog is personalized and has completed all activities. It has a picture of you from Gravatar, an "About Me" page with information and another picture. All activities from the session are uploaded in the same "Technology Bim. 1" entry and categorized as "Assessment". The PowerPoint, videos, Excel file and self-evaluation are uploaded as posts with required attributes. Your comment on the assessment page includes all needed information and the assessment was finished in under 50 minutes.
Your blog is personalized and has completed all activities. It has a picture of you from Gravatar, an "About Me" page with information and another picture. All activities from the session are uploaded in the same "Technology Bim. 1" entry and categorized as "Assessment". The PowerPoint, videos, Excel file and self-evaluation are uploaded as posts with required attributes. Your comment on the assessment page includes all needed information and the assessment was finished in under 50 minutes.
Your blog is personalized and has completed all activities. It has a picture of you from Gravatar, an "About Me" page with information and another picture. All activities from the session are uploaded in the same "Technology Bim. 1" entry and categorized as "Assessment". The PowerPoint, videos, Excel file and self-evaluation are uploaded as posts with required attributes. Your comment on the assessment page includes all needed information and the assessment was finished in under 50 minutes.
Your blog is personalized and has completed all activities. It has a picture of you from Gravatar, an "About Me" page with information and another picture. All activities from the session are uploaded in the same "Technology Bim. 1" entry and categorized as "Assessment". The PowerPoint, videos, Excel file and self-evaluation are uploaded as posts with required attributes. Your comment on the assessment page includes all needed information and the assessment was finished in under 50 minutes.
Your blog is personalized and has completed all activities. It has a picture of you from Gravatar, an "About Me" page with information and another picture. All activities from the session are uploaded in the same "Technology Bim. 1" entry and categorized as "Assessment". The PowerPoint, videos, Excel file and self-evaluation are uploaded as posts with required attributes. Your comment on the assessment page includes all needed information and the assessment was finished in under 50 minutes.
Your blog is personalized and has completed all activities. It has a picture of you from Gravatar, an "About Me" page with information and another picture. All activities from the session are uploaded in the same "Technology Bim. 1" entry and categorized as "Assessment". The PowerPoint is uploaded as the first post with full presentation features. Videos are the second post in order and properly sized. The Excel file is the third post without links or changes. Your self-evaluation and comment were also posted and your assessment was completed in under 50 minutes.
Your blog is personalized and has completed all activities. It has a picture of you from Gravatar, an "About Me" page with information and another picture. All activities from the session are uploaded in the same "Technology Bim. 1" entry and categorized as "Assessment". The PowerPoint, videos, Excel file and self-evaluation are uploaded as posts with required attributes. Your comment on the assessment page includes all needed information and the assessment was finished in under 50 minutes.
1. Technology assessment criteria of 8th grade
Criteria 1 points 2 Points 3 points 4 points 5 Points 6 Points
The student explains the
The student describes the The student explains the problem, discussing its
problem, mentioning its problem, mentioning its relevance and critically
The student states the The student describes the relevance and investigates the relevance and critically investigates the problem,
problem and investigates problem, mentioning its problem, selecting and investigates the problem, evaluating information from a
The student states the
the problem, collecting relevance and investigates analyzing information from evaluating information from broad range of appropriate,
A: Investigate problem and investigates
information from sources the problem, selecting some acknowledged sources some acknowledged acknowledged sources. The
the problem. student describes detailed
and lists some information from some and describes a test to sources and describes a
specifications. acknowledged sources. evaluate the product/solution test to evaluate the methods for appropriate testing
against the design product/solution against the to evaluate the
specification. design specification. product/solution against the
design specification.
The student generates a
The student generates a The student generates range of feasible designs, The student generates a range
The student generates The student generates a of feasible designs, each
few designs, justifying the some designs, justifying each evaluated against the
one design, and makes range of designs, justifying evaluated against the design
choice of one design and the choice of one design design specification,
B: Design some attempt to justify
makes some attempt to and makes some attempt
the choice of one design and
justifying the chosen design
specification and justifies the
this against the design evaluates it fully this against chosen design and evaluates
justify this against the to justify this against the and evaluates it fully this it fully and critically against the
specification. the design specification.
design specification. design specification. against the design design specification.
specification.
The student produces a plan The student produces a plan
The student produces a plan that contains a number of
The student produces a The student produces a that contains a number of
The student produces a that contains a number of detailed, logical steps that
plan that contains some plan that contains a number logical steps that describe
plan that contains a few logical steps that describe the describe the use of resources
C: Plan details of the steps and/or
details of the steps and of logical steps that
use of resources and time, and
the use of resources and
and time. The student critically
includes resources and describe the use of time, evaluating the plan
the resources required. makes some attempt to evaluates the plan and justifies
time. resources and time. and justifying any any modifications to the
evaluate the plan.
modifications to the design. design.
2. Criteria 1 points 2 Points 3 points 4 points 5 Points 6 Points
The student uses The student uses appropriate The student competently The student competently
The student considers the appropriate techniques and techniques and equipment, uses appropriate techniques uses appropriate techniques
and equipment. The student
The student considers the plan and uses appropriate equipment, and follows the and follows the plan, and equipment and follows
follows the plan and justifies
D: Create plan and creates at least techniques and equipment plan and mentions any justifying any modifications the plan, justifying any
any modifications made,
part of a product/solution. to create a modifications made, made, resulting in a modifications made, resulting resulting in a product/solution
product/solution. resulting in a product/solution of good in a product/solution of of appropriate quality using
product/solution. quality. appropriate quality. the resources available.
The student evaluates the
success of the
The student evaluates
The student evaluates the product/solution in an
product/solution in an
The student evaluates the product/solution in an objective objective manner based on
objective manner based on
product/solution and his or manner based on the results of the results of testing, and the
The student evaluates the The student evaluates the the results of testing, and the
her own performance, and testing, and provides an views of the intended users,
product/solution or his or product/solution and his or views of the intended users,
suggests ways in which evaluation of his or her own providing an evaluation of his
E: Evaluate her own performance and her own performance, and
these could be improved, performance, and provides an
providing an evaluation of his
or her own performance, and
makes some attempt to makes some attempt to test or her own performance, and
testing the product/solution appropriate evaluation of the suggests improvements,
test the product/solution. the product/solution. suggests improvements,
to evaluate it against the impact of the product/solution providing an appropriate
providing an appropriate
design specification. on life, society and/or the evaluation of the impact of
evaluation of the impact of
environment. the product/solution on life,
the product/solution.
society and/or the
environment.
The student rarely
The student occasionally The student sometimes The student frequently The student consistently
displays a satisfactory The student often displays a
displays a satisfactory displays a satisfactory displays a satisfactory displays a satisfactory
standard in personal satisfactory standard in
standard in personal standard in personal standard in personal standard in personal
engagement (motivation, personal engagement
engagement (motivation, engagement (motivation, engagement (motivation, engagement (motivation,
F: Attitudes in independence, general
independence, general independence, general independence, general
(motivation, independence,
independence, general
Technology positive attitude) or in general positive attitude) and
positive attitude) or in team positive attitude) and in positive attitude) and in team positive attitude) and in team
team work (attitudes in team work (attitudes
work (attitudes towards team work (attitudes work (attitudes towards safety, work (attitudes towards
towards safety, towards safety, cooperation
safety, cooperation and towards safety, cooperation cooperation and respect for safety, cooperation and
cooperation and respect and respect for others).
respect for others). and respect for others). others). respect for others).
for others).
Average: