The document is a technical assistance feedback form that rates the quality of assistance provided in areas such as timeliness, relevance, and friendliness using a scale from 1 to 5. It includes definitions for each rating level to guide users in providing their feedback. The form is intended for educational providers in the Philippines to enhance the effectiveness of support services.

2. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FEEDBACK FORM
Name of Technical Assistance Provider:
Date:
Purpose:
Instructional Supervision / Classroom Observation
Coaching and Mentoring
School Learning Action Cell (SLAC)
Collegial Meetings / Focus Group Discussion
Others:
Please specify:
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE RATING
(Note: The highest score is 5 and the lowest score is 1.)
Timeliness
1 2 3 4 5
Relevance
1 2 3 4 5
Friendliness
1 2 3 4 5
COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS:
Signature Over Printed Name
Position:
Republika ng Pilipinas
Kagawaran ng Edukasyon
REHIYON V- BICOL
TANGGAPANG PANSANGAY NG CATANDUANES
San Miguel South District
KATIPUNAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

3. Timeliness:
1: Very Low (Unacceptable)
The assistance was significantly delayed, causing major inconvenience or hindrance in progress.
2: Low (Below Expectations)
The assistance was slow and delayed, impacting the efficiency of the support provided.
3: Moderate (Met Expectations)
The assistance was delivered in a reasonable timeframe, meeting basic expectations.
4: High (Above Expectations)
The assistance was prompt and timely, contributing positively to the resolution of the issue.
5: Very High (Exceptional)
The assistance was extremely quick and timely, enabling a swift resolution and minimizing disruption.
Relevance:
1: Very Low (Unrelated)
The assistance provided was completely irrelevant to the issue or question.
2: Low (Not Helpful)
The assistance had limited relevance and did not effectively address the issue or question.
3: Moderate (Partially Helpful)
The assistance had some relevance but needed further improvement to fully address the issue or question.
4: High (Relevant and Useful)
The assistance was relevant and useful in addressing the issue or question, although minor improvements
could enhance relevance.
5: Very High (Highly Relevant and Useful)
The assistance was highly relevant and extremely useful in precisely addressing the issue or question.
Friendliness:
1: Very Low (Rude and Unprofessional)
The interaction was hostile, rude, or extremely unprofessional.
2: Low (Unfriendly)
The interaction lacked warmth and friendliness, affecting the overall experience negatively.
3: Moderate (Neutral)
The interaction was neutral in terms of friendliness, not particularly friendly but not rude either.
4: High (Friendly and Polite)
The interaction was friendly, polite, and courteous, contributing positively to the experience.
5: Very High (Exceptionally Friendly and Warm)
The interaction was exceptionally friendly, warm, and welcoming, making the overall experience highly
pleasant.