The document discusses guidelines for recording finds and objects in a database. It provides examples of the types of information to include such as image descriptions, findspots, dates, materials, and measurements. It also discusses writing clear and unambiguous descriptions, backing claims with evidence, and including extra details. The document offers tips on quoting parallels and guidance on what to record after 1700 AD, focusing on objects that tell a story or help identify other finds.
What’s Missing?
To utilise resources in the most efficient way, one must understand the issues that these resources are trying to address. Gathering the information required to make informed decisions is perhaps the best way to deal with the next step in Portable Antiquities, their place in academic research and public heritage value.
Exploring the UK systems and preconceptions, this paper deals with the realities in the field and uses the authors previously gathered information along with statistical analysis that compares the two main processes of artefact collection – detecting and commercial archaeology.
Drawing on a wealth of recent analysis and fieldwork, the purpose will be to reassess the directions taken, and argue for a focussed approach that acknowledges both the benefits and harsh realities when it comes to dealing with portable antiquities collection, sale and recording in the UK.
The final consideration will be to find ways in which to ensure the maximum recoverable knowledge - which includes the views of the primary source of these items; the detecting community, with proactive contact with all relevant bodies and groups to gain a first hand insight, rather than unworkable impositions.
What’s Missing?
To utilise resources in the most efficient way, one must understand the issues that these resources are trying to address. Gathering the information required to make informed decisions is perhaps the best way to deal with the next step in Portable Antiquities, their place in academic research and public heritage value.
Exploring the UK systems and preconceptions, this paper deals with the realities in the field and uses the authors previously gathered information along with statistical analysis that compares the two main processes of artefact collection – detecting and commercial archaeology.
Drawing on a wealth of recent analysis and fieldwork, the purpose will be to reassess the directions taken, and argue for a focussed approach that acknowledges both the benefits and harsh realities when it comes to dealing with portable antiquities collection, sale and recording in the UK.
The final consideration will be to find ways in which to ensure the maximum recoverable knowledge - which includes the views of the primary source of these items; the detecting community, with proactive contact with all relevant bodies and groups to gain a first hand insight, rather than unworkable impositions.
Portable X-ray Fluorescence (PXRF) for Compositional Analysis of Early Americ...Olympus IMS
Handheld XRF analyzers are used worldwide to provide highly specific material chemistry for rapid and accurate identification of alloys and metals. Industrial requirements for quality control, plant maintenance, and profit/loss have prompted portable XRF manufacturers to minimize measurement times, ruggedize analyzer housings, simplify operation, extend the elemental range and detection limits, and improve the accuracy (correctness) and precision (reproducibility) of the results.
The nuances of archaeological, conservational, and collectible metalware analyses are similar to those for industry. The objectives of the analysis, the representativeness of the sample measurements, and the condition of the sample are all important considerations. Part of a private early American metalware collection in Salem, Massachusetts, was made available to illustrate the versatility of portable, handheld XRF measurements.
Contact us: http://bit.ly/1rDmq94
Sign up for our newsletter: http://bit.ly/1j5FOTy
Historical inquiry for s1 workshop notes (anthropology, archaeology and accou...Lloyd Yeo
These are a set of notes form a workshop conducted for S1 History Teachers on how to interpret Singapore History in pre-modern times (14th century to 15th century) using the historical lenses of archaeology, anthropology and historical accounts.
More Related Content
Similar to Talk to the PAS Volunteer Recording Conference, 8 Jan 2011, slideshare version
Portable X-ray Fluorescence (PXRF) for Compositional Analysis of Early Americ...Olympus IMS
Handheld XRF analyzers are used worldwide to provide highly specific material chemistry for rapid and accurate identification of alloys and metals. Industrial requirements for quality control, plant maintenance, and profit/loss have prompted portable XRF manufacturers to minimize measurement times, ruggedize analyzer housings, simplify operation, extend the elemental range and detection limits, and improve the accuracy (correctness) and precision (reproducibility) of the results.
The nuances of archaeological, conservational, and collectible metalware analyses are similar to those for industry. The objectives of the analysis, the representativeness of the sample measurements, and the condition of the sample are all important considerations. Part of a private early American metalware collection in Salem, Massachusetts, was made available to illustrate the versatility of portable, handheld XRF measurements.
Contact us: http://bit.ly/1rDmq94
Sign up for our newsletter: http://bit.ly/1j5FOTy
Historical inquiry for s1 workshop notes (anthropology, archaeology and accou...Lloyd Yeo
These are a set of notes form a workshop conducted for S1 History Teachers on how to interpret Singapore History in pre-modern times (14th century to 15th century) using the historical lenses of archaeology, anthropology and historical accounts.
Similar to Talk to the PAS Volunteer Recording Conference, 8 Jan 2011, slideshare version (20)
21. LIN-AC7FF0 There are four ring-and-dot motifs on each side – or is there one on each side, and four on the front and back? Edges can also be a problem….
22.
23. Medieval animal-head mount with each image oriented correctly Lead die with Roman numerals – the images are not oriented correctly
24.
25. Quoting parallels – in order of usefulness 1. Excavated parallels from dated archaeological contexts give solid evidence for date (e.g. Museum of London finds books) 2. Unstratified archaeological finds or the PAS database do not have dates, but have good findspots and often evidence for other parallels which eventually lead you back to a date 3. Books with lots of pictures, identifications and dates, but no evidence backing this up are the worst.
30. In practice – things you will record Complete objects that help us understand or identify incomplete and difficult objects These things used to be a puzzle – were they Roman spoon handles?
31. No, they were 18 th - or 19 th -century… what? Candlestick elements, drawer handles, curtain tie-back handles have all been suggested. NCL-775DF4 SOM-6B52C5 NMS-FA74E3