PREPARED BY: MOHAMMED BHARMAL
             NR INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
             AHMEDABAD
• Larsen & Toubro   • Grasim Industries
  Cement
• The first player in this battle was Reliance
  Industries Limited (RIL), in the late 1980’s.
• Armed with 10.05 percentage stake in L&T
  was aspiring to acquire as a whole.
• For L&T it was life and death issue. But then
  L&T was successful to fought back tooth and
  nail.
• At that time major stake holder of L&T were
  LIC and UTI.
• This was not all over.
• On November 18, 2001 the threat again raised for
  L&T when RIL sold its entire stake to Grasim (A. V.
  Birla group) at 46 percent higher price than
  market.
• On October 13, 2002 Grasim made a public
  announcement of open offer to acquire 20 percent
  stake in L&T at Rs.190 per share.
• On November 8, 2002 the SEBI asked not to
  proceed with this offer since it wanted to
  investigate the matter.
• Further, on January 27, 2003 Grasim made a
  counter proposal of vertical de-merger of cement
  business to L&T board.
• Grasim valued L&T’s cement business at Rs.
  130/- per share and make open offer to acquire
  control the cement business / company.
• By April 2003, the SEBI came to conclusion
  that Grasim had not violated Takeover
  Code, and that its offer was valid subject to
  making some additional disclosures.
• However Grasim had got only 0.38 percent
  stake in open offer.
• But wit the help of its subsidiary co. it
  managed to get 15.73 percent of L&T equity
  capital.
• Thereafter, in June 2003 itself the L&T
  management and Birla’s hammered out a
  deal to carry out a structured de-merger of
  cement business of L&T .
• It was decided that post de-merger, Grasim
  will acquire the control of the resultant
  cement company.
• However, L&T managed to retain certain key
  assets like L&T brand, ready mix cement
  (RMC) business, the gas power plant in
  Andhra Pradesh, and the entire residential
  and office property of the cement division.
• As a part of the scheme of de-merger L&T
  was allotted 20 percent of UlraTech’s equity.
• The open offer by Grasim was meant for not
  only taking control of UltraTech, but to give a
  chance to FIs to bring down their stake, in the
  process making hefty capital gains.
• In acquiring L&T’s cement business, Birla had a simple
  motive of ‘growth through acquisition’
• After acquisition the combined capacity of Grasim and
  UltraTech went up to 31 mn. tones, making Grasim the
  largest producer in India and the eighth largest in the world.
• While Grasim was strong in the Southern markets, L&T
  was strong in the rest of India. L&T’s strong distribution
  network was very vital to Grasim to push its own brands
  also.
• L&T was also considered as a premium brand and used to
  fetch higher price. Though this brand would not be
  available to Grasim in the long run, L&T allowed Grasim to
  use it for more than a year post acquisition.
• On July 6 Larsen & Toubro and Grasim
  Industries announced the completion of
  the scheme of demerger L&T’s cement
  division with Grasim having acquired a
  majority stake in it.
                             Ramnath Subbu
                             The Hindu
                             Mumbai, 6 July 2004
Takeover battle between grasim and l&t

Takeover battle between grasim and l&t

  • 1.
    PREPARED BY: MOHAMMEDBHARMAL NR INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AHMEDABAD
  • 2.
    • Larsen &Toubro • Grasim Industries Cement
  • 3.
    • The firstplayer in this battle was Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), in the late 1980’s. • Armed with 10.05 percentage stake in L&T was aspiring to acquire as a whole. • For L&T it was life and death issue. But then L&T was successful to fought back tooth and nail. • At that time major stake holder of L&T were LIC and UTI. • This was not all over.
  • 4.
    • On November18, 2001 the threat again raised for L&T when RIL sold its entire stake to Grasim (A. V. Birla group) at 46 percent higher price than market. • On October 13, 2002 Grasim made a public announcement of open offer to acquire 20 percent stake in L&T at Rs.190 per share. • On November 8, 2002 the SEBI asked not to proceed with this offer since it wanted to investigate the matter. • Further, on January 27, 2003 Grasim made a counter proposal of vertical de-merger of cement business to L&T board. • Grasim valued L&T’s cement business at Rs. 130/- per share and make open offer to acquire control the cement business / company.
  • 5.
    • By April2003, the SEBI came to conclusion that Grasim had not violated Takeover Code, and that its offer was valid subject to making some additional disclosures. • However Grasim had got only 0.38 percent stake in open offer. • But wit the help of its subsidiary co. it managed to get 15.73 percent of L&T equity capital. • Thereafter, in June 2003 itself the L&T management and Birla’s hammered out a deal to carry out a structured de-merger of cement business of L&T .
  • 6.
    • It wasdecided that post de-merger, Grasim will acquire the control of the resultant cement company. • However, L&T managed to retain certain key assets like L&T brand, ready mix cement (RMC) business, the gas power plant in Andhra Pradesh, and the entire residential and office property of the cement division. • As a part of the scheme of de-merger L&T was allotted 20 percent of UlraTech’s equity. • The open offer by Grasim was meant for not only taking control of UltraTech, but to give a chance to FIs to bring down their stake, in the process making hefty capital gains.
  • 7.
    • In acquiringL&T’s cement business, Birla had a simple motive of ‘growth through acquisition’ • After acquisition the combined capacity of Grasim and UltraTech went up to 31 mn. tones, making Grasim the largest producer in India and the eighth largest in the world. • While Grasim was strong in the Southern markets, L&T was strong in the rest of India. L&T’s strong distribution network was very vital to Grasim to push its own brands also. • L&T was also considered as a premium brand and used to fetch higher price. Though this brand would not be available to Grasim in the long run, L&T allowed Grasim to use it for more than a year post acquisition.
  • 8.
    • On July6 Larsen & Toubro and Grasim Industries announced the completion of the scheme of demerger L&T’s cement division with Grasim having acquired a majority stake in it. Ramnath Subbu The Hindu Mumbai, 6 July 2004