The document outlines an assignment for a paper on improving a system of transition of care from hospitals to skilled nursing facilities. It instructs the student to identify a transition of care, describe key stakeholders and leadership strategies, and explain how systems thinking would inform an improvement plan. It provides feedback from a previous assignment and asks the student to incorporate that feedback into an annotated bibliography on their selected transition of care.
Standardized Bedside ReportingOne of the goals of h.docxwhitneyleman54422
Standardized Bedside Reporting
One of the goals of healthcare is to ensure that the patients get the best service possible while not compromising on the satisfaction and goodwill of the nurses and other healthcare professionals. A key aspect of ensuring quality healthcare is the consistent handling of patient information from nurse to nurse during shifts; information handled wrongly can jeopardize the patients’ health (Baker, 2010). It is important to implement procedures that ensure consistent and smooth handling of patient information from nurse to nurse to increase patient safety and improve nurse satisfaction. This paper will explore the merits of standardized bedside reporting as opposed to board reporting in ensuring a positive outcome and consistent quality healthcare.
Change model overview
A key aspect in determining whether bedside shift reporting has any merits over board reporting is the John Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Process (JHNEBP). The John Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Process is a framework for guiding the translation and synthesis of evidence into valid healthcare practice. JHNEBP has three cornerstones that include research, education, and practice; the framework ensures that research evidence is the basis of clinical decision-making. (Dearholt & Dang, 2012) The implementation of the John Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Process has three key phases, the first phase is the identification of an important question, the second phase involves the systematic review of research evidence, and the third phase is translating the results into action. Nurses should use the JHNEBP process because it provides a clear way for healthcare professionals to translate research results into healthcare practice.
Practice Question
The team includes several key stakeholders who will benefit greatly from my research. Among the team members include myself as ER nurse, charge nurse, ERT ( Emergency room tech), nurse case manager, nurse supervisor, physician and hospital manager.
The evidence-based practice question that the team members will explore is "Does the use of a standardized bedside report versus board reporting help increase patient safety, nurse satisfaction, and positive outcome?" The evidence-based practice question assesses the ability of bedside shift reporting to improve healthcare provision. The practice area of the question is clinical. The practice issue came about because of assessing risk management concerns in ensuring good health practices. To answer the question, the team members gathered evidence from patient preferences, peer-reviewed journals, and clinical guidelines. The team members searched peer-reviewed journal databases to gather relevant information from previous research that could affect the results.
Understanding the merits of bedside shift reporting as opposed to board reporting is important as most healthcare organization use either strategy in collecting and passin.
Standardized Bedside ReportingOne of the goals of h.docxwhitneyleman54422
Standardized Bedside Reporting
One of the goals of healthcare is to ensure that the patients get the best service possible while not compromising on the satisfaction and goodwill of the nurses and other healthcare professionals. A key aspect of ensuring quality healthcare is the consistent handling of patient information from nurse to nurse during shifts; information handled wrongly can jeopardize the patients’ health (Baker, 2010). It is important to implement procedures that ensure consistent and smooth handling of patient information from nurse to nurse to increase patient safety and improve nurse satisfaction. This paper will explore the merits of standardized bedside reporting as opposed to board reporting in ensuring a positive outcome and consistent quality healthcare.
Change model overview
A key aspect in determining whether bedside shift reporting has any merits over board reporting is the John Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Process (JHNEBP). The John Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Process is a framework for guiding the translation and synthesis of evidence into valid healthcare practice. JHNEBP has three cornerstones that include research, education, and practice; the framework ensures that research evidence is the basis of clinical decision-making. (Dearholt & Dang, 2012) The implementation of the John Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Process has three key phases, the first phase is the identification of an important question, the second phase involves the systematic review of research evidence, and the third phase is translating the results into action. Nurses should use the JHNEBP process because it provides a clear way for healthcare professionals to translate research results into healthcare practice.
Practice Question
The team includes several key stakeholders who will benefit greatly from my research. Among the team members include myself as ER nurse, charge nurse, ERT ( Emergency room tech), nurse case manager, nurse supervisor, physician and hospital manager.
The evidence-based practice question that the team members will explore is "Does the use of a standardized bedside report versus board reporting help increase patient safety, nurse satisfaction, and positive outcome?" The evidence-based practice question assesses the ability of bedside shift reporting to improve healthcare provision. The practice area of the question is clinical. The practice issue came about because of assessing risk management concerns in ensuring good health practices. To answer the question, the team members gathered evidence from patient preferences, peer-reviewed journals, and clinical guidelines. The team members searched peer-reviewed journal databases to gather relevant information from previous research that could affect the results.
Understanding the merits of bedside shift reporting as opposed to board reporting is important as most healthcare organization use either strategy in collecting and passin.
113DNP Prospectus Comment by Cynthia Fletcher Th.docxherminaprocter
1
13
DNP Prospectus Comment by Cynthia Fletcher: This is a good beginning Ann Marie. There are many areas that we will discuss at our meeting to improve clarity and congruence with a DNP Project.
Educating Inpatient Nurses to use Standardized Care Plans
Anne Marie Wouapet
Doctor of Nursing Practice – Nursing Informatics
A00505587
Prospectus: Educating Inpatient Nurses to use Standardized Care Plans
Problem Statement
Standardized care plans can be described as the pre-determined menu of interventions which are used for different patient situations (Monsen, Swenson & Kerr, 2016). Evidence-based care is the conscientious use of the most recent evidence to make decisions on the care of individual patients or in the delivery of health care services (Murdaugh, Parsons & Pender, 2018). The current best evidence is the most recent information which has been obtained from valid and relevant research about the effects of different types of healthcare, the accuracy of diagnostic tests, the potential for harm from exposure to different agents, or predictive power of prognostic factor (Schmidt & Brown, 2017). Standardized care plans form the main basis for the implementation of evidence-based care directly in practice and for the improvement of patient outcomes (Nussbaum et al., 2015; Yehuda & Hoge, 2016). A health care facility recently transitioned to the use of a new and better electronic health record system. The facility also purchased standardized care plans to increase efficiency in their operations. However, the compliance with using the standardized care plans was only 40 percent among the inpatient nurses. Comment by Cynthia Fletcher: ?Comment by Cynthia Fletcher: Questionable purpose.Comment by Cynthia Fletcher: Was it different for those who were not inpatient nurses?
Accordingly, the facility recently had a visit from the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and received a negative rating because the nurses were not adding care plans based on the patients' primary problem or diagnosis in the patients' charts upon admission. This presents several specific problems in the healthcare facility. There is poor compliance from the nurses concerning the addition of standardized care plans to the charts of patients based on their diagnosis or primary problem(s). The system which the facility invested in was not being used for the improvement of patient outcomes and quality of care delivered. The focus of this project is the failure of inpatient nurses to make use of standardized care plans. The gap in nursing is the failure of delivery of evidence-based practice using the standardized care plans which result in poor patient outcomes and quality of life. One of the areas of knowledge that has not yet been explored is the cause of low rates of adoption of standardized care plans by nurses. Another gap is the lack of studies on nurses’ perception of the standardized care plans and how they affect their use in .
E V I D E N C E S Y N T H E S I SModels of care in nursing.docxmadlynplamondon
E V I D E N C E S Y N T H E S I S
Models of care in nursing: a systematic reviewjbr_287 324..337
Ritin Fernandez RN MN (Critical Care) PhD,1,2 Maree Johnson RN BAppSci MAppSci PhD,3,4
Duong Thuy Tran BMed (Vietnam) MIPH (USyd)5 and Charmaine Miranda BPsycholgy6
1School of Nursing, Midwifery and Indigenous Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, 2Centre for Research in Nursing and
Health, St George Hospital, Kogarah, 3Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Sydney South West Area Health Service, 4School of Nursing
and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, 5School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, and 6Centre for Positive
Psychology and Education, School of Education, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Abstract
Objective This review investigated the effect of the various models of nursing care delivery using the diverse levels
of nurses on patient and nursing outcomes.
Methods All published studies that investigated patient and nursing outcomes were considered. Studies were
included if the nursing delivery models only included nurses with varying skill levels. A literature search was
performed using the following databases: Medline (1985–2011), CINAHL (1985–2011), EMBASE (1985 to current)
and the Cochrane Controlled Studies Register (Issue 3, 2011 of Cochrane Library). In addition, the reference lists of
relevant studies and conference proceedings were also scrutinised. Two reviewers independently assessed the
eligibility of the studies for inclusion in the review, the methodological quality and extracted details of eligible studies.
Data were analysed using the RevMan software (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark).
Results Fourteen studies were included in this review. The results reveal that implementation of the team nursing
model of care resulted in significantly decreased incidence of medication errors and adverse intravenous outcomes,
as well as lower pain scores among patients; however, there was no effect of this model of care on the incidence of
falls. Wards that used a hybrid model demonstrated significant improvement in quality of patient care, but no
difference in incidence of pressure areas or infection rates. There were no significant differences in nursing outcomes
relating to role clarity, job satisfaction and nurse absenteeism rates between any of the models of care.
Conclusions Based on the available evidence, a predominance of team nursing within the comparisons is
suggestive of its popularity. Patient outcomes, nurse satisfaction, absenteeism and role clarity/confusion did not differ
across model comparisons. Little benefit was found within primary nursing comparisons and the cost effectiveness
of team nursing over other models remains debatable. Nonetheless, team nursing does present a better model for
inexperienced staff to develop, a key aspect in units where skill mix or experience is diverse.
Key words: evidence-based practice, nursing, systemat ...
E V I D E N C E S Y N T H E S I SModels of care in nursing.docxkanepbyrne80830
E V I D E N C E S Y N T H E S I S
Models of care in nursing: a systematic reviewjbr_287 324..337
Ritin Fernandez RN MN (Critical Care) PhD,1,2 Maree Johnson RN BAppSci MAppSci PhD,3,4
Duong Thuy Tran BMed (Vietnam) MIPH (USyd)5 and Charmaine Miranda BPsycholgy6
1School of Nursing, Midwifery and Indigenous Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, 2Centre for Research in Nursing and
Health, St George Hospital, Kogarah, 3Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Sydney South West Area Health Service, 4School of Nursing
and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, 5School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, and 6Centre for Positive
Psychology and Education, School of Education, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Abstract
Objective This review investigated the effect of the various models of nursing care delivery using the diverse levels
of nurses on patient and nursing outcomes.
Methods All published studies that investigated patient and nursing outcomes were considered. Studies were
included if the nursing delivery models only included nurses with varying skill levels. A literature search was
performed using the following databases: Medline (1985–2011), CINAHL (1985–2011), EMBASE (1985 to current)
and the Cochrane Controlled Studies Register (Issue 3, 2011 of Cochrane Library). In addition, the reference lists of
relevant studies and conference proceedings were also scrutinised. Two reviewers independently assessed the
eligibility of the studies for inclusion in the review, the methodological quality and extracted details of eligible studies.
Data were analysed using the RevMan software (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark).
Results Fourteen studies were included in this review. The results reveal that implementation of the team nursing
model of care resulted in significantly decreased incidence of medication errors and adverse intravenous outcomes,
as well as lower pain scores among patients; however, there was no effect of this model of care on the incidence of
falls. Wards that used a hybrid model demonstrated significant improvement in quality of patient care, but no
difference in incidence of pressure areas or infection rates. There were no significant differences in nursing outcomes
relating to role clarity, job satisfaction and nurse absenteeism rates between any of the models of care.
Conclusions Based on the available evidence, a predominance of team nursing within the comparisons is
suggestive of its popularity. Patient outcomes, nurse satisfaction, absenteeism and role clarity/confusion did not differ
across model comparisons. Little benefit was found within primary nursing comparisons and the cost effectiveness
of team nursing over other models remains debatable. Nonetheless, team nursing does present a better model for
inexperienced staff to develop, a key aspect in units where skill mix or experience is diverse.
Key words: evidence-based practice, nursing, systemat.
FAMILY-CENTERED CARE DURING OUTPATIENT SURGERY1FAMILY-CENTERED ChereCheek752
FAMILY-CENTERED CARE DURING OUTPATIENT SURGERY1
FAMILY-CENTERED CARE DURING OUTPATIENT SURGERY2
This sample paper gives students an idea of how to address the content of the CAP. Please be sure to focus on the content and not the formatting. This paper has not been updated to reflect the 7th edition APA rules! See Prof. Piccinini’s side notes in the margins.
Family-Centered Communication in Day Surgery
Three Quality of Care key drivers for Our Lady of the Resurrection (OLR) Medical Center’s Surgical Services department are measured quarterly. The Surgical Services Department has met or exceeded targets for two of the three key drivers. However, for the past six months, the department has not met the goal for a third key driver: explanations provided about progress following surgery. Meeting the goal for the third key driver is dependent on effective communication processes from staff and surgeons to patients and their families. A communication process exists, but by looking at areas in which the process is broken, relatively easy and effective fixes can be put into place. Comment by Carina Piccinini: Topic introduction, overview of issue, choice of topic.
The charge nurse for preoperative and recovery care has identified difficulty in adhering to the current process due to difficulty in locating family members if they leave the waiting room and due to the volume and acuity of patients that enter the recovery area. The nurse manager has also identified meeting the third key driver as a priority for the institution and supports the project.Comment by Carina Piccinini: Pertinence of issue to the unit and preceptor and unit manager buy-in
Increasing patient satisfaction—and thereby increasing the likelihood of returning to the facility for healthcare needs—can benefit the unit and the organization by increasing revenues. The profession of nursing can also benefit by increasing staff and improving technologies for patient care with additional revenues.Comment by Carina Piccinini: Benefit to the unit/organization
Literature Review of Problem
Much research on factors influencing patient satisfaction in perioperative care has been conducted. A driving factor identified is communication to patients and families during care.
Yellen (2003) surveyed ambulatory surgery patients to determine the influence of the nurse-sensitive variables of age, gender, culture, previous hospital admissions, nurse communication, pain, and satisfaction with pain management on overall patient satisfaction. Results showed that nurse communication was the most significant indicator of patient satisfaction, and satisfaction with pain management was the second most significant indicator. Furthermore, patients who were satisfied with nurse communication also reported satisfaction with pain management.
Fry and Warren (2005) conducted a qualitative study to determine the needs of family members in the waiting room of a critical care unit. Results showed that all pa ...
Showcases digital health implementation in Ontario
hospitals.
Each story is focused around a key challenge,
an explanation of the process taken to address it, and
a reflection on the impact
113DNP Prospectus Comment by Cynthia Fletcher Th.docxherminaprocter
1
13
DNP Prospectus Comment by Cynthia Fletcher: This is a good beginning Ann Marie. There are many areas that we will discuss at our meeting to improve clarity and congruence with a DNP Project.
Educating Inpatient Nurses to use Standardized Care Plans
Anne Marie Wouapet
Doctor of Nursing Practice – Nursing Informatics
A00505587
Prospectus: Educating Inpatient Nurses to use Standardized Care Plans
Problem Statement
Standardized care plans can be described as the pre-determined menu of interventions which are used for different patient situations (Monsen, Swenson & Kerr, 2016). Evidence-based care is the conscientious use of the most recent evidence to make decisions on the care of individual patients or in the delivery of health care services (Murdaugh, Parsons & Pender, 2018). The current best evidence is the most recent information which has been obtained from valid and relevant research about the effects of different types of healthcare, the accuracy of diagnostic tests, the potential for harm from exposure to different agents, or predictive power of prognostic factor (Schmidt & Brown, 2017). Standardized care plans form the main basis for the implementation of evidence-based care directly in practice and for the improvement of patient outcomes (Nussbaum et al., 2015; Yehuda & Hoge, 2016). A health care facility recently transitioned to the use of a new and better electronic health record system. The facility also purchased standardized care plans to increase efficiency in their operations. However, the compliance with using the standardized care plans was only 40 percent among the inpatient nurses. Comment by Cynthia Fletcher: ?Comment by Cynthia Fletcher: Questionable purpose.Comment by Cynthia Fletcher: Was it different for those who were not inpatient nurses?
Accordingly, the facility recently had a visit from the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and received a negative rating because the nurses were not adding care plans based on the patients' primary problem or diagnosis in the patients' charts upon admission. This presents several specific problems in the healthcare facility. There is poor compliance from the nurses concerning the addition of standardized care plans to the charts of patients based on their diagnosis or primary problem(s). The system which the facility invested in was not being used for the improvement of patient outcomes and quality of care delivered. The focus of this project is the failure of inpatient nurses to make use of standardized care plans. The gap in nursing is the failure of delivery of evidence-based practice using the standardized care plans which result in poor patient outcomes and quality of life. One of the areas of knowledge that has not yet been explored is the cause of low rates of adoption of standardized care plans by nurses. Another gap is the lack of studies on nurses’ perception of the standardized care plans and how they affect their use in .
E V I D E N C E S Y N T H E S I SModels of care in nursing.docxmadlynplamondon
E V I D E N C E S Y N T H E S I S
Models of care in nursing: a systematic reviewjbr_287 324..337
Ritin Fernandez RN MN (Critical Care) PhD,1,2 Maree Johnson RN BAppSci MAppSci PhD,3,4
Duong Thuy Tran BMed (Vietnam) MIPH (USyd)5 and Charmaine Miranda BPsycholgy6
1School of Nursing, Midwifery and Indigenous Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, 2Centre for Research in Nursing and
Health, St George Hospital, Kogarah, 3Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Sydney South West Area Health Service, 4School of Nursing
and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, 5School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, and 6Centre for Positive
Psychology and Education, School of Education, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Abstract
Objective This review investigated the effect of the various models of nursing care delivery using the diverse levels
of nurses on patient and nursing outcomes.
Methods All published studies that investigated patient and nursing outcomes were considered. Studies were
included if the nursing delivery models only included nurses with varying skill levels. A literature search was
performed using the following databases: Medline (1985–2011), CINAHL (1985–2011), EMBASE (1985 to current)
and the Cochrane Controlled Studies Register (Issue 3, 2011 of Cochrane Library). In addition, the reference lists of
relevant studies and conference proceedings were also scrutinised. Two reviewers independently assessed the
eligibility of the studies for inclusion in the review, the methodological quality and extracted details of eligible studies.
Data were analysed using the RevMan software (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark).
Results Fourteen studies were included in this review. The results reveal that implementation of the team nursing
model of care resulted in significantly decreased incidence of medication errors and adverse intravenous outcomes,
as well as lower pain scores among patients; however, there was no effect of this model of care on the incidence of
falls. Wards that used a hybrid model demonstrated significant improvement in quality of patient care, but no
difference in incidence of pressure areas or infection rates. There were no significant differences in nursing outcomes
relating to role clarity, job satisfaction and nurse absenteeism rates between any of the models of care.
Conclusions Based on the available evidence, a predominance of team nursing within the comparisons is
suggestive of its popularity. Patient outcomes, nurse satisfaction, absenteeism and role clarity/confusion did not differ
across model comparisons. Little benefit was found within primary nursing comparisons and the cost effectiveness
of team nursing over other models remains debatable. Nonetheless, team nursing does present a better model for
inexperienced staff to develop, a key aspect in units where skill mix or experience is diverse.
Key words: evidence-based practice, nursing, systemat ...
E V I D E N C E S Y N T H E S I SModels of care in nursing.docxkanepbyrne80830
E V I D E N C E S Y N T H E S I S
Models of care in nursing: a systematic reviewjbr_287 324..337
Ritin Fernandez RN MN (Critical Care) PhD,1,2 Maree Johnson RN BAppSci MAppSci PhD,3,4
Duong Thuy Tran BMed (Vietnam) MIPH (USyd)5 and Charmaine Miranda BPsycholgy6
1School of Nursing, Midwifery and Indigenous Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, 2Centre for Research in Nursing and
Health, St George Hospital, Kogarah, 3Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Sydney South West Area Health Service, 4School of Nursing
and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, 5School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, and 6Centre for Positive
Psychology and Education, School of Education, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Abstract
Objective This review investigated the effect of the various models of nursing care delivery using the diverse levels
of nurses on patient and nursing outcomes.
Methods All published studies that investigated patient and nursing outcomes were considered. Studies were
included if the nursing delivery models only included nurses with varying skill levels. A literature search was
performed using the following databases: Medline (1985–2011), CINAHL (1985–2011), EMBASE (1985 to current)
and the Cochrane Controlled Studies Register (Issue 3, 2011 of Cochrane Library). In addition, the reference lists of
relevant studies and conference proceedings were also scrutinised. Two reviewers independently assessed the
eligibility of the studies for inclusion in the review, the methodological quality and extracted details of eligible studies.
Data were analysed using the RevMan software (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark).
Results Fourteen studies were included in this review. The results reveal that implementation of the team nursing
model of care resulted in significantly decreased incidence of medication errors and adverse intravenous outcomes,
as well as lower pain scores among patients; however, there was no effect of this model of care on the incidence of
falls. Wards that used a hybrid model demonstrated significant improvement in quality of patient care, but no
difference in incidence of pressure areas or infection rates. There were no significant differences in nursing outcomes
relating to role clarity, job satisfaction and nurse absenteeism rates between any of the models of care.
Conclusions Based on the available evidence, a predominance of team nursing within the comparisons is
suggestive of its popularity. Patient outcomes, nurse satisfaction, absenteeism and role clarity/confusion did not differ
across model comparisons. Little benefit was found within primary nursing comparisons and the cost effectiveness
of team nursing over other models remains debatable. Nonetheless, team nursing does present a better model for
inexperienced staff to develop, a key aspect in units where skill mix or experience is diverse.
Key words: evidence-based practice, nursing, systemat.
FAMILY-CENTERED CARE DURING OUTPATIENT SURGERY1FAMILY-CENTERED ChereCheek752
FAMILY-CENTERED CARE DURING OUTPATIENT SURGERY1
FAMILY-CENTERED CARE DURING OUTPATIENT SURGERY2
This sample paper gives students an idea of how to address the content of the CAP. Please be sure to focus on the content and not the formatting. This paper has not been updated to reflect the 7th edition APA rules! See Prof. Piccinini’s side notes in the margins.
Family-Centered Communication in Day Surgery
Three Quality of Care key drivers for Our Lady of the Resurrection (OLR) Medical Center’s Surgical Services department are measured quarterly. The Surgical Services Department has met or exceeded targets for two of the three key drivers. However, for the past six months, the department has not met the goal for a third key driver: explanations provided about progress following surgery. Meeting the goal for the third key driver is dependent on effective communication processes from staff and surgeons to patients and their families. A communication process exists, but by looking at areas in which the process is broken, relatively easy and effective fixes can be put into place. Comment by Carina Piccinini: Topic introduction, overview of issue, choice of topic.
The charge nurse for preoperative and recovery care has identified difficulty in adhering to the current process due to difficulty in locating family members if they leave the waiting room and due to the volume and acuity of patients that enter the recovery area. The nurse manager has also identified meeting the third key driver as a priority for the institution and supports the project.Comment by Carina Piccinini: Pertinence of issue to the unit and preceptor and unit manager buy-in
Increasing patient satisfaction—and thereby increasing the likelihood of returning to the facility for healthcare needs—can benefit the unit and the organization by increasing revenues. The profession of nursing can also benefit by increasing staff and improving technologies for patient care with additional revenues.Comment by Carina Piccinini: Benefit to the unit/organization
Literature Review of Problem
Much research on factors influencing patient satisfaction in perioperative care has been conducted. A driving factor identified is communication to patients and families during care.
Yellen (2003) surveyed ambulatory surgery patients to determine the influence of the nurse-sensitive variables of age, gender, culture, previous hospital admissions, nurse communication, pain, and satisfaction with pain management on overall patient satisfaction. Results showed that nurse communication was the most significant indicator of patient satisfaction, and satisfaction with pain management was the second most significant indicator. Furthermore, patients who were satisfied with nurse communication also reported satisfaction with pain management.
Fry and Warren (2005) conducted a qualitative study to determine the needs of family members in the waiting room of a critical care unit. Results showed that all pa ...
Showcases digital health implementation in Ontario
hospitals.
Each story is focused around a key challenge,
an explanation of the process taken to address it, and
a reflection on the impact
Similar to System of Transition of Care Part 2 Paper.pdf (20)
Show drafts
volume_up
Empowering the Data Analytics Ecosystem: A Laser Focus on Value
The data analytics ecosystem thrives when every component functions at its peak, unlocking the true potential of data. Here's a laser focus on key areas for an empowered ecosystem:
1. Democratize Access, Not Data:
Granular Access Controls: Provide users with self-service tools tailored to their specific needs, preventing data overload and misuse.
Data Catalogs: Implement robust data catalogs for easy discovery and understanding of available data sources.
2. Foster Collaboration with Clear Roles:
Data Mesh Architecture: Break down data silos by creating a distributed data ownership model with clear ownership and responsibilities.
Collaborative Workspaces: Utilize interactive platforms where data scientists, analysts, and domain experts can work seamlessly together.
3. Leverage Advanced Analytics Strategically:
AI-powered Automation: Automate repetitive tasks like data cleaning and feature engineering, freeing up data talent for higher-level analysis.
Right-Tool Selection: Strategically choose the most effective advanced analytics techniques (e.g., AI, ML) based on specific business problems.
4. Prioritize Data Quality with Automation:
Automated Data Validation: Implement automated data quality checks to identify and rectify errors at the source, minimizing downstream issues.
Data Lineage Tracking: Track the flow of data throughout the ecosystem, ensuring transparency and facilitating root cause analysis for errors.
5. Cultivate a Data-Driven Mindset:
Metrics-Driven Performance Management: Align KPIs and performance metrics with data-driven insights to ensure actionable decision making.
Data Storytelling Workshops: Equip stakeholders with the skills to translate complex data findings into compelling narratives that drive action.
Benefits of a Precise Ecosystem:
Sharpened Focus: Precise access and clear roles ensure everyone works with the most relevant data, maximizing efficiency.
Actionable Insights: Strategic analytics and automated quality checks lead to more reliable and actionable data insights.
Continuous Improvement: Data-driven performance management fosters a culture of learning and continuous improvement.
Sustainable Growth: Empowered by data, organizations can make informed decisions to drive sustainable growth and innovation.
By focusing on these precise actions, organizations can create an empowered data analytics ecosystem that delivers real value by driving data-driven decisions and maximizing the return on their data investment.
Opendatabay - Open Data Marketplace.pptxOpendatabay
Opendatabay.com unlocks the power of data for everyone. Open Data Marketplace fosters a collaborative hub for data enthusiasts to explore, share, and contribute to a vast collection of datasets.
First ever open hub for data enthusiasts to collaborate and innovate. A platform to explore, share, and contribute to a vast collection of datasets. Through robust quality control and innovative technologies like blockchain verification, opendatabay ensures the authenticity and reliability of datasets, empowering users to make data-driven decisions with confidence. Leverage cutting-edge AI technologies to enhance the data exploration, analysis, and discovery experience.
From intelligent search and recommendations to automated data productisation and quotation, Opendatabay AI-driven features streamline the data workflow. Finding the data you need shouldn't be a complex. Opendatabay simplifies the data acquisition process with an intuitive interface and robust search tools. Effortlessly explore, discover, and access the data you need, allowing you to focus on extracting valuable insights. Opendatabay breaks new ground with a dedicated, AI-generated, synthetic datasets.
Leverage these privacy-preserving datasets for training and testing AI models without compromising sensitive information. Opendatabay prioritizes transparency by providing detailed metadata, provenance information, and usage guidelines for each dataset, ensuring users have a comprehensive understanding of the data they're working with. By leveraging a powerful combination of distributed ledger technology and rigorous third-party audits Opendatabay ensures the authenticity and reliability of every dataset. Security is at the core of Opendatabay. Marketplace implements stringent security measures, including encryption, access controls, and regular vulnerability assessments, to safeguard your data and protect your privacy.
Adjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTESSubhajit Sahu
Graph algorithms, like PageRank Compressed Sparse Row (CSR) is an adjacency-list based graph representation that is
Multiply with different modes (map)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector multiply.
2. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector multiply.
Sum with different storage types (reduce)
1. Performance of vector element sum using float vs bfloat16 as the storage type.
Sum with different modes (reduce)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector element sum.
2. Performance of memcpy vs in-place based CUDA based vector element sum.
3. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (memcpy).
4. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
Sum with in-place strategies of CUDA mode (reduce)
1. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
As Europe's leading economic powerhouse and the fourth-largest hashtag#economy globally, Germany stands at the forefront of innovation and industrial might. Renowned for its precision engineering and high-tech sectors, Germany's economic structure is heavily supported by a robust service industry, accounting for approximately 68% of its GDP. This economic clout and strategic geopolitical stance position Germany as a focal point in the global cyber threat landscape.
In the face of escalating global tensions, particularly those emanating from geopolitical disputes with nations like hashtag#Russia and hashtag#China, hashtag#Germany has witnessed a significant uptick in targeted cyber operations. Our analysis indicates a marked increase in hashtag#cyberattack sophistication aimed at critical infrastructure and key industrial sectors. These attacks range from ransomware campaigns to hashtag#AdvancedPersistentThreats (hashtag#APTs), threatening national security and business integrity.
🔑 Key findings include:
🔍 Increased frequency and complexity of cyber threats.
🔍 Escalation of state-sponsored and criminally motivated cyber operations.
🔍 Active dark web exchanges of malicious tools and tactics.
Our comprehensive report delves into these challenges, using a blend of open-source and proprietary data collection techniques. By monitoring activity on critical networks and analyzing attack patterns, our team provides a detailed overview of the threats facing German entities.
This report aims to equip stakeholders across public and private sectors with the knowledge to enhance their defensive strategies, reduce exposure to cyber risks, and reinforce Germany's resilience against cyber threats.
Levelwise PageRank with Loop-Based Dead End Handling Strategy : SHORT REPORT ...Subhajit Sahu
Abstract — Levelwise PageRank is an alternative method of PageRank computation which decomposes the input graph into a directed acyclic block-graph of strongly connected components, and processes them in topological order, one level at a time. This enables calculation for ranks in a distributed fashion without per-iteration communication, unlike the standard method where all vertices are processed in each iteration. It however comes with a precondition of the absence of dead ends in the input graph. Here, the native non-distributed performance of Levelwise PageRank was compared against Monolithic PageRank on a CPU as well as a GPU. To ensure a fair comparison, Monolithic PageRank was also performed on a graph where vertices were split by components. Results indicate that Levelwise PageRank is about as fast as Monolithic PageRank on the CPU, but quite a bit slower on the GPU. Slowdown on the GPU is likely caused by a large submission of small workloads, and expected to be non-issue when the computation is performed on massive graphs.
Levelwise PageRank with Loop-Based Dead End Handling Strategy : SHORT REPORT ...
System of Transition of Care Part 2 Paper.pdf
1. Assignment: System of Transition of Care Part 2 Paper
Assignment: System of Transition of Care Part 2 Paper ON Assignment: System of
Transition of Care Part 2 PaperI have attached the part I-Module 2 assignment which I
completed. The following assignment must use the references which are in part I that I have
attached.To prepare:Review feedback on your Module 2 Assignment 1 (from Week 4). You
should incorporate your Instructor’s feedback and continue to add to and refine your
annotated bibliography for your selected transition of care.Consider the nurse leader’s role
in achieving the IHI Quadruple Aim for this transition of care. (Hint: Draw from resources
on systems thinking and nurse leaders’ ability to influence innovation and
change.)Assignment (5–6 pages, not including title and reference page):Write a paper in
which you address the following:Identity your selected example of a transition of
care.Describe the key stakeholders that might be involved in this transition of care and the
leadership strategies you would use to engage and influence them.Explain how you, as a
nurse leader along with your healthcare team, would apply systems thinking when
providing a transition of care aligned with the IHI Quadruple Aim framework in order to
improve it. Explain the fourth aim and strategy you would use and why.Explain how
systems thinking would inform your improvement plan for the specific transition of care
you selected.Be sure your paper includes a title page and a reference page. You should also
resubmit your refined Annotated Bibliography.-The response clearly and accurately
identifies a transition of care.-The response clearly, accurately, and with appropriate detail
describes key stakeholders who may be involved in the transition of care. Leadership
strategies for engaging and influencing stakeholders are appropriate, clear, and thoroughly
described.-The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how to apply systems
thinking when providing a transition of care aligned with the IHI Quadruple Aim framework
in order to improve it. The fourth aim and strategy are appropriate, clear, and justified.-The
response accurately and thoroughly explains how systems thinking would inform the
improvement plan for the transition of care.md02assgn1broomes.d.6201_3.docUnformatted
Attachment Preview1 Annotated Bibliography on Transition of Care from Hospitals to
Skilled Nursing Facilities Dana Broomes Walden University NURS 6201 Section 3
Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare March 20, 2020 2 Introduction There are many
factors toward improving the quality of care for chronically ill older adults, enhancing
transitions within acute hospital settings, and improving patient handoffs to and from acute
care hospitals. The research indicates that there are existing gaps in care for these patients
and their caregivers during critical transitions that can lead to adverse events, unmet needs,
2. low satisfaction with care, and high rehospitalization rates (Naylor & Keating, 2008).
Studies also show that there are key elements to improving these transitions of care and
enhancing the of family caregivers which are to remain focused on the patients’ and family
caregivers’ needs, preferences, and goals, to utilize interdisciplinary teams guided by
evidence-based protocols, to improve communication among patients, caregivers, and
providers, and to use information systems to monitor care and outcomes (Naylor & Keating,
2008).The research suggests that comprehensive assessments of patients’ and caregivers’
needs should be performed at the time of the patients’ admissions to the hospital, since they
often lack the knowledge, skills, and resources to properly manage their follow-on home
health care (Naylor & Keating, 2008). The following annotated bibliography summarizes
five scholarly articles that address different components in the transition of care that nurse
leaders must focus on to safely manage patients’ continuity of care from acute care hospitals
to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). Annotated Bibliography Dizon, M., Zaltsmann, R., &
Reinking, C. (2017). Partnerships in Transitions: Acute Care to Skilled Nursing Facility.
Professional Case Management, 22(4), 163–173. Retrieved from https://doi-
org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1097/ncm.0000000000000199 The purpose of this
collaborative study was to describe the efforts and results of the work done to address the
need to identify patients at high risk for unplanned readmission to hospitals 3 after being
discharged to skilled nursing (SNFs). According to the study, in 2004, 34% of Medicare
patients were readmitted to the hospital within 90 days of discharge, which resulted in an
estimated cost of $17.4, and older adults discharged to SNFs have higher rates of unplanned
readmissions due to their multiple comorbidities and complex inpatient care. Therefore,
Dizon, Zaltsmann, & Reinking conducted a comprehensive review to identify the unmet
needs of patients and caregivers that could ensure smooth transitions, educate patients and
caregivers, and facilitate communication between acute care facilities and SNFs. The
leadership teams of an acute care hospital in Northern California and eleven SNFs worked
together to focus on collaboration, communication, and competency by identifying problem
areas, objectives to address them, and actions necessary to achieve their established goals.
Assignment: System of Transition of Care Part 2 PaperThey conducted monthly meetings to
review unplanned readmissions that were evaluated by the hospital’s NP and SNF clinical
staff to identify trends and action items. These reviews helped to identify gaps in care and
opportunities for improvement. Two case studies were also presented in the article that
identified the major problem that the hospital was not consistent in providing correct
information to the SNFs which resulted in the formulation of three objectives of the
hospital-SNF partnership: the creation of standardized forms for transferring patients,
including checklists for hospital to SNF and SNF to ED transfers, incorporating transitions
work in the role of NPs to communicate directly with the bedside nurse with follow-up calls
post transfers, and enhanced communication by video conferencing. The case studies also
identified that end-of-life and palliative care was not adequately addressed by either agency
which led to more thorough assessments of patients’ and caregivers’ needs and more
collaborative communication with consistent messaging regarding end of life care options. 4
The multidisciplinary work between the hospital and contributing SNFs resulted in shared
accountability, better communication based on teambuilding, enabled smooth transitions,
3. and improved patient care. It involved bed-side staff and executive with shared decision-
making among facilities to improve workflow and communication between care settings.
The study also identified future work that can be done, such as including provider to
provider handoffs, collaboration with home health agencies, and the use of standardized
protocols at SNFs to improve patient care while decreasing healthcare costs. Hirschman, K.,
Shaid, E., McCauley, K., Pauly, M., & Naylor, M. (2015). Continuity of Care: The Transitional
Care Model.Online Journal Of Issues In Nursing, 20(3), 1. Retrieved from https://eds-b-
ebscohost-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/eds/detail/detail? vid= 1&sid=7fe09b20-b81d-
4202-8043-157089ce5a1e%40sessionmgr103&bdata=JnNpd
GU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=26882510&db=mnh This article by
Hirschman, Shaid, McCauley, and Naylor presents the Transitional Care Model (TCM), which
is an evidence-based, a nurse-led intervention focused on older adults at risk for poor
outcomes as they transfer between healthcare settings and attending providers. The TCM
focuses on the Triple Aim, improving care, enhancing outcomes for patients and family
caregivers, and reducing healthcare costs for chronically ill, older adults. Randomized
clinical trials have demonstrated the success of the TCM to improve acutely ill patients’
experiences, health, and quality of life outcomes with reduced rehospitalization rates and
overall healthcare costs of the chronically ill. The authors summarize the model’s core
components, which are screening, staffing, maintaining relationships, engaging patients and
family caregivers, assessing and managing risks and symptoms, educating and promoting
self-management, collaborating, promoting continuity, 5 and fostering coordination which
are interconnected and part of a holistic care process. The staffing used in the TCM uses
APRNs who are leading the care for their patients transitioning from acute hospital care and
have been identified as high risk for poor outcomes. The APRNs maintain the responsibility
for the daily delivery of transitional care services as well as overseeing other healthcare
team members. Assignment: System of Transition of Care Part 2 PaperThey screen patients,
conduct comprehensive assessments, establish trusted relationships with patients and
caregivers, educating them and promoting self-management to keep them engaged in their
healthcare plans. The APRNs also lead the way, promoting communication and connections
between hospital, post-acute, and community-based staff to facilitate the transfer of
essential information using secure email systems and electronic health records. The APRNs
engaged with patients, caregivers, and other team members work to ensure that patients
have smooth transitions of care with comprehensive treatment plans. The research team
established metrics to benchmark adherence and measure the program’s outcomes. There
is an ongoing study to help identify how health systems in America are adapting the TCM’s
core components to improve continuity of care through transitions. The article states that,
according to the Coalition for Evidence Based Policy, the TCM (2014) has been recognized
as a “top-tiered, evidence-based approach” that could have a significant positive effect on
Medicare beneficiaries transitioning from hospital to home. By adopting one or more of the
TCM’s core components to local practices, nurse leaders can implement this care
management approach to improve outcomes and assure that patients and their caregivers
have the and resources needed to help manage their care. Jusela, C., Struble, L., Gallagher,
N. A., Redman, R., & Ziemba, A. (2017). Communication 6 Between Acute Care Hospitals and
4. Skilled Nursing Facilities During Care Transitions. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 43(3),
19–28. Retrieved from https://doi-org.ezp. waldenulibrary.org/10.3928/00989134-
20161109-03 The findings of the research conducted by Jusela, Struble, Gallagher, Redman,
and Ziemba also the need for improved TCMs and better communication of information
between acute care settings and SNFs for transitioning patients. The article cited an
Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s study from 2014 that reported poor communication
of medical information accounts for nearly 50% of errors during care transitions. These
transitions have been identified as “vulnerable exchange points,” and care plans from one
setting are often not communicated to the next care team. The study was a retrospective
convenience sample chart audit, and all patients admitted to the SNF from an acute care
hospital were examined. The checklist was based on local and national standards. It
revealed the following discrepancies: transferring physician contact information was
missing in 65%, medication lists were missing from 1%, steroid tapering instructions
missing from 42%, antiarrhythmic instructions missing from 38%, duration/indication of
anticoagulant medications missing from 25%, and antibiotic medications missing from 22%
of the patient charts. The accuracy and completeness of the discharging providers’
instructions also affect patients’ transitions. There were multiple implications based on the
results of this study. The data suggests the need for education and training of HCPs in both
SNF and acute care settings, including developing standardized forms, designating
leadership roles for accountability, and conducting quality improvement projects. The
researchers also suggested cross-continuum team meetings and the creation of policies and
procedures that allow for monitoring and collecting feedback 7 about discharge planning
processes, including information transfer, clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, patient
understanding, and input from the provider and/or next care setting. Jusela, Struble,
Gallagher, Redman, and Ziemba identified nurse leaders as positioned to identify
recommended elements of data transfer for optimal patient outcomes and capable of
making recommendations for policy reform and quality improvement projects, removing
barriers to care. They suggest the creation of additional educational workshops that would
create awareness of institutional capabilities and/or barriers and would also facilitate
smoother transitions in care. Healthcare providers must be able to communicate effectively
and provide patients and caregivers with the resources that will enable them to be engaged
in their care plans. King, B. J., Gilmore-Bykovskyi, A. L., Roiland, R. A., Polnaszek, B. E.,
Bowers, B. J., & Kind, A. J. H. (2013). The consequences of poor communication during
transitions from hospital to skilled nursing facility: a qualitative study. Journal Of The
American Geriatrics Society, 61(7), 1095–1102. Retrieved from: https://doi-
org.ezp.waldenu library.org/10.1111/jgs.12328 According to King et al., there are multiple
inadequacies of hospital discharge information, including regular problems with medication
orders, little psychosocial or functional history, and inaccurate information regarding the
current health status of patients when patients are transferring to SNFs. Assignment:
System of Transition of Care Part 2 PaperThese inadequacies create delays in care,
increased SNF staff stress, frustrated patients and family members, and increased risk of
rehospitalization. With all the deficiencies identified in hospital?to?SNF transitions, poor
discharge communication was listed as the primary barrier to safe and effective transitions.
5. The article reports more than five million patients transition from hospitals to SNFs every
year, and nurses are primarily responsible for receiving and initiating these individuals’
care. 8 The objective of this study was to examine the patients’ transitions of care, the
barriers nurses experience, and the outcomes associated with variations in the quality of
transitions by analyzing detailed information obtained in focus groups and interviews with
practicing SNF nurses. The research suggests that high?quality, complete discharge
communication is crucial to safe and effective hospital–SNF transitions, and a lack of
transitional care training among health professionals might contribute to poor?quality
discharge communication since accreditation guidelines for physician and nursing training
programs are vague. Kerstenetzky, L., Birschbach, M. J., Beach, K. F., Hager, D. R., & Kennelty,
K. A. (2018). Improving medication information transfer between hospitals, skilled-nursing
facilities, and long-term-care pharmacies for hospital discharge transitions of care: A
targeted needs assessment using the Intervention Mapping framework. Research In Social &
Administrative Pharmacy: RSAP, 14(2), 138–145. Retrieved from
https://wwwsciencedirect-
com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/science/article/pii/S155174111630374 6?via%3Dihub A
patients’ transition from a hospital to a SNF introduces the likelihood of medication errors.
According to this study, three-fourths of hospital to SNF admissions had at least one
medication discrepancy, and approximately 40% of medication errors are thought to be a
result of inadequate medication reconciliation procedures during transitions, with 20% of
these errors are believed to cause patient harm. This study reports on the development of a
logic model used to explore methods for minimizing patient medication delays and errors
while further improving handoff communication from hospital to SNF pharmacy staff to
improve the quality of care for patients transitioning from hospital to SNF. 9
Communication handoff for patients discharging to SNFs is an interdisciplinary effort
between providers, nurses, pharmacists, and social workers/case managers, but this
process is not standardized across disciplines. The study identified a common theme among
SNF staff of onedirectional discharge communication from the hospital with little
opportunity for feedback on patient care concerns. It was also determined that certain
communications are expected to occur as typical workflow, while some only occur if
clarifications are necessary. It was determined that the handoff process for hospital
discharge teams should be formalized, and the admitting SNF will receive handoff education
about the contents of the hospital discharge packet to eliminate gaps in transitional care.
Conclusion This annotated bibliography summarized five scholarly articles that address
different components in the transition of care that nurse leaders must focus on to safely
manage patients’ continuity of care from acute care hospitals to skilled nursing facilities
(SNFs). The studies identified key elements in improving these transitions of care and
enhancing the of family caregivers. Since multidisciplinary teams are involved when
transferring patient care, each member of the health care team must communicate clearly
with each other, patients, and their family members to comprehensively manage care
transitions to reduce healthcare costs, improve outcomes, and meet the needs of patients
and their caregivers. Reference: Naylor, M., & Keating, S. A. (2008). Transitional Care. AJN
6. American Journal of Nursing, 108(9), 58–63. Retrieved from https://doi-
org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1097/