7. zycnzj.com/ www.zycnzj.com
-712- 心理科学进展 2009 年
Unpublished Doctorial Dissertation, The Chinese University of metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Educational
Hong Kong. Psychology, 97(4), 723–731.
Chen, Q. S., & Shiu, L. P. (2007, May). Two senses of Maki, R. H., Willmon, C., & Pietan, A. (in press). Basis of
metacomprehension monitoring. Paper presented at 19th annual metamemory judgments for text with multiple-choice, essay
convention of the Association for Psychological Science (APS), and recall tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology.
Washington, DC. Matlin, M. W. (2005). Cognition (6th ed.). New York: John Wiley
Dunlosky, J., Baker, J. M. C., Rawson, K. A., & Hertzog, C. & Sons Miesner, M. T., & Maki, R. H. (2007). The role of test
(2006). Does aging influence people's metacomprehension? anxiety in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy.
Effects of processing ease on judgments of text learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4-5), 650–670.
Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 390–400. Moore, D., Lin, L. A., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2005). A source of
Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief metacomprehension inaccuracy. Reading Psychology, 26(3),
history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in 251–265
Psychological Science, 16(4), 228–232. Mulligan, N. W., & Lozito, J. P. (2006). An asymmetry between
Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Why does rereading memory encoding and retrieval: Revelation, generation, and
improve metacomprehension accuracy? Evaluating the transfer-appropriate processing. Psychological Science, 17(1),
levels-of-disruption hypothesis for the rereading effect. 7–11.
Discourse Processes, 40 (1), 37–55. Nelson, T. O., Narens, L., & Dunlosky, J. (2004). A revised
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., & Middleton, E. L. (2005). What methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment recall
constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? and monitoring (PRAM). Psychological Methods, 9(1), 53–69.
Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2002). Are performance
hypotheses. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), predictions for text based on ease of processing? Journal of
551–565. Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
Gillström, Å., & Rönnberg, J. (1995). Comprehension calibration 28(1), 69–80
and recall prediction accuracy of texts: Reading skill, reading Rawson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (2005). Rereading effects depend
strategies, and effort. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), on time of test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1),
545–558. 70–80.
Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2003). Summarizing can
comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 15(1), 84–93. improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary
Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2008). Individual Educational Psychology, 28(2), 129–160.
differences, rereading, and self-explanation: Concurrent Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003).
processing and cue validity as constraints on Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts.
metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 36(1), Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 66–73.
93–103 Thiede, K. W., Dunlosky, J., Griffin, T. D., & Wiley, J. (2005).
Jee, B., Wiley, J., & Griffin, T. D. (2006). Expertise and the Understanding the delayed-keyword effect on
illusion of comprehension. Proceedings of the Annual metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Experimental
Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 387–392. Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6),
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. 1267–1280.
New York: Cambridge University Press. Thomas, A. K., & McDaniel, M. A. (2007a). Metacomprehension
Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s knowledge during study: A for educationally relevant materials: Dramatic effects of
cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of encoding-retrieval interactions. Psychonomic Bulletin &
Experimental Psychology: General, 126(4), 349–370. Review, 14(2), 212–218.
Lin, L. M., & Zabrucky, K. M. (1998). Calibration of Thomas, A. K., & McDaniel, M. A. (2007b). The negative
comprehension: Research and implications for education and cascade of incongruent generative study-test processing in
instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(4), memory and metacomprehension. Memory & Cognition, 35(4),
345–391. 668–678.
Maki, R. H., & McGuire, M. J. (2002). Metacognition for text: Weaver, C. A., III, & Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring of
Findings and implications for education. In T. J. Perfect, & B. comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for
L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 39–67). narrative and expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23(1),
Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 12–22.
Maki, R. H., Shields, M., Wheeler, A., E., & Zacchilli, T. L. Weaver, C. A., III, & Kelemen, W. L. (2003). Processing
(2005). Individual differences in absolute and relative similarity does not improve metamemory: Evidence against
zycnzj.com/http://www.zycnzj.com/
8. zycnzj.com/ www.zycnzj.com
第 17 卷第 4 期 读者的元理解监测为什么不精确？ -713-
transfer-appropriate monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 132(4), 408–428.
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), Wiley, J., Thiede, K. W., & Griffin, T. D. (2007, April). What does
1058–1065. it mean to learn from and understand science text? Paper
Wiley, J., Griffin, T. D., & Thiede, K. W. (2005). Putting the presented at the 2007 annual meeting of the American
comprehension in metacomprehension. Journal of General Education Research Association (AERA), Chicago, IL.
Which Factors Constrain the Accuracy of Metacomprehension
Monitoring?
CHEN Qi-Shan1,2, CHANG Rui3
(1 Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)
(2 Department of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)
(3 Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority, Hong Kong, China)
Abstract: Accurate metacomprehension monitoring is crucial to effective metacomprehension control and reading
comprehension. However, previous research has showed that metacomprehension monitoring accuracy is far less
impressive. Hence, the key issues were addressed in our paper: what factors constrain the accuracy of
metacomprehension monitoring. Variables that affected the accuracy of metacomprehension monitoring include that
the characters of texts, the orienting activity that may provide cues for the monitoring judgment, and the types of
criterion tests. Finally, we made some suggestions and presented new ideas in terms of the research of
metacomprehension monitoring accuracy. In particular, we proposed that concordance among monitoring judgment
forms, monitoring cues, and criterion test is the key for accurate metacomprehension monitoring.
Keyword: metacomprehension monitoring; judgment forms; monitoring cues; criterion test; accuracy
zycnzj.com/http://www.zycnzj.com/
