MW2011: Cope, A., Authority Records, Future Computers and Other Unfinished Hi...museums and the web
What becomes the role for institutions and scholars charged with the study and safe-keeping of the past and the near-future when traditional methodologies like "authority records" are forced to compete with automated data collection, machine learning, the now suddenly practical reality of "big data" and the rise of broad communities of participation?
The breadth and reach of the Internet and the availability of alternative data sources, whether they are harvested programmatically or fashioned by amateur communities of interest has created a world where both the conceptual and financial economics of traditional scholarship are rapidly being undermined. Further, in the absence of a way for non-experts to feel as though they can participate in the discourse outside of established venues and vocabularies the opinions and assumed meritocracies of experts are increasingly being overlooked entirely.
What would it mean to change the role of digital preservation and scholarly interpretation from one where it looks and feels, to those the outside, like castle walls to be more like a rough guide composed of road signs and fence-posts? To consider a project whose goal is no longer to weave elaborate tapestries of the past facts but to produce textiles, and patterns, to be fashioned into reflections of the present?
A presentation from Museums and the Web 2011.
Using Web 2 0 Tools To "Enliven" Projects Nov 20Anna Koval
anna koval (me) and marie slim presented this at the 2009 california school library association conference. =)
for a hyperlinked, clickable version, please go to: http://bit.ly/5MSlsv
Researchers, Discovery and the Internet: What Next?David Smith
A web2.0 issues and implications overview I put together for the Research Information Network as part of their workshop on researchers and discovery services.
http://www.rin.ac.uk/discovery-services-workshop
Scanned and Delivered: How the DHLab made remote research workYHRUploads
This interview with DHLab Director Peter Leonard, Program Manager Catherine DeRose, and Director of Communications for the Library Patricia Carey comprises The Stacks, a conversation series published by The Yale Historical Review.
Are you being served? How knowing digital users can help you improve access to your alderman and notary archives and loads of other stuff (Südwestdeutscher Archivtag, Konstanz, Germany, 24 May 2014)
This conversation with Jana Krentz, Curator for Latin American and Iberian Collections at Yale, comprises The Stacks, a conversation series published by The Yale Historical Review.
Slides from a talk given by Stacy Allison-Cassin and William Denton, of York University, at the Ontario Library Association 2009 Super Conference, 29 January 2009.
Available under a Creative Commons license.
http://hdl.handle.net/10315/2501
Introduction to the International Image Interoperability FrameworkIIIF_io
A presentation given at the International Image Interoperability Framework event held at the Museum of Modern Art in New York City on May 10, 2016.
Tom Cramer
Stanford University Libraries
A presentation at the workshop "Rich and loonely or poor and popular?" at the Dublin Core conference in Lisbon on September 4th, 2013. The main hypothesis is that when publishing (linked) data, the main criteria should not be richness and poorness, but suitability for purpose, granularity and adherence to agreed-on models.
MW2011: Cope, A., Authority Records, Future Computers and Other Unfinished Hi...museums and the web
What becomes the role for institutions and scholars charged with the study and safe-keeping of the past and the near-future when traditional methodologies like "authority records" are forced to compete with automated data collection, machine learning, the now suddenly practical reality of "big data" and the rise of broad communities of participation?
The breadth and reach of the Internet and the availability of alternative data sources, whether they are harvested programmatically or fashioned by amateur communities of interest has created a world where both the conceptual and financial economics of traditional scholarship are rapidly being undermined. Further, in the absence of a way for non-experts to feel as though they can participate in the discourse outside of established venues and vocabularies the opinions and assumed meritocracies of experts are increasingly being overlooked entirely.
What would it mean to change the role of digital preservation and scholarly interpretation from one where it looks and feels, to those the outside, like castle walls to be more like a rough guide composed of road signs and fence-posts? To consider a project whose goal is no longer to weave elaborate tapestries of the past facts but to produce textiles, and patterns, to be fashioned into reflections of the present?
A presentation from Museums and the Web 2011.
Using Web 2 0 Tools To "Enliven" Projects Nov 20Anna Koval
anna koval (me) and marie slim presented this at the 2009 california school library association conference. =)
for a hyperlinked, clickable version, please go to: http://bit.ly/5MSlsv
Researchers, Discovery and the Internet: What Next?David Smith
A web2.0 issues and implications overview I put together for the Research Information Network as part of their workshop on researchers and discovery services.
http://www.rin.ac.uk/discovery-services-workshop
Scanned and Delivered: How the DHLab made remote research workYHRUploads
This interview with DHLab Director Peter Leonard, Program Manager Catherine DeRose, and Director of Communications for the Library Patricia Carey comprises The Stacks, a conversation series published by The Yale Historical Review.
Are you being served? How knowing digital users can help you improve access to your alderman and notary archives and loads of other stuff (Südwestdeutscher Archivtag, Konstanz, Germany, 24 May 2014)
This conversation with Jana Krentz, Curator for Latin American and Iberian Collections at Yale, comprises The Stacks, a conversation series published by The Yale Historical Review.
Slides from a talk given by Stacy Allison-Cassin and William Denton, of York University, at the Ontario Library Association 2009 Super Conference, 29 January 2009.
Available under a Creative Commons license.
http://hdl.handle.net/10315/2501
Introduction to the International Image Interoperability FrameworkIIIF_io
A presentation given at the International Image Interoperability Framework event held at the Museum of Modern Art in New York City on May 10, 2016.
Tom Cramer
Stanford University Libraries
A presentation at the workshop "Rich and loonely or poor and popular?" at the Dublin Core conference in Lisbon on September 4th, 2013. The main hypothesis is that when publishing (linked) data, the main criteria should not be richness and poorness, but suitability for purpose, granularity and adherence to agreed-on models.
Web Archives at the Nexus of Good Fakes and Flawed OriginalsMichael Nelson
Michael L. Nelson
Old Dominion University
Web Science & Digital Libraries Research Group @WebSciDL, @phonedude_mln
Drexel CCI IS Department Distinguished Speaker Series, 2020-03-09
Data by itself is simply a collection of numbers. It only becomes meaningful when we weave it through context. A context of relevance that creates information - provides insight, creates solutions and solves problems. The Web gives us a fabric of connectedness, but if the data isn't substantiated semantically, the information we create isn't very useful. By building effective web assets using platforms like Drupal, we build ways to solve problems across the spectrum from local to global. We not only build the Web the way it was meant to be, but we also build it to support a commons across community, enterprise and government for generations to come.
Using the conversion of Taxonomic Literature II as an example, I discuss in this high-level presentation some things to keep in mind while creating a linked open data set.
Also I present a few examples and links to LOD data sets and more information.
Lecture for LIS 644 "Digital Trends, Tools, and Debates." Not my strong point, so I won't swear there are no errors. If you reuse, please respect the CC-BY-NC-SA license on the photo.
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Tobias Schneck
As AI technology is pushing into IT I was wondering myself, as an “infrastructure container kubernetes guy”, how get this fancy AI technology get managed from an infrastructure operational view? Is it possible to apply our lovely cloud native principals as well? What benefit’s both technologies could bring to each other?
Let me take this questions and provide you a short journey through existing deployment models and use cases for AI software. On practical examples, we discuss what cloud/on-premise strategy we may need for applying it to our own infrastructure to get it to work from an enterprise perspective. I want to give an overview about infrastructure requirements and technologies, what could be beneficial or limiting your AI use cases in an enterprise environment. An interactive Demo will give you some insides, what approaches I got already working for real.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams.
Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
Search and Society: Reimagining Information Access for Radical FuturesBhaskar Mitra
The field of Information retrieval (IR) is currently undergoing a transformative shift, at least partly due to the emerging applications of generative AI to information access. In this talk, we will deliberate on the sociotechnical implications of generative AI for information access. We will argue that there is both a critical necessity and an exciting opportunity for the IR community to re-center our research agendas on societal needs while dismantling the artificial separation between the work on fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics in IR and the rest of IR research. Instead of adopting a reactionary strategy of trying to mitigate potential social harms from emerging technologies, the community should aim to proactively set the research agenda for the kinds of systems we should build inspired by diverse explicitly stated sociotechnical imaginaries. The sociotechnical imaginaries that underpin the design and development of information access technologies needs to be explicitly articulated, and we need to develop theories of change in context of these diverse perspectives. Our guiding future imaginaries must be informed by other academic fields, such as democratic theory and critical theory, and should be co-developed with social science scholars, legal scholars, civil rights and social justice activists, and artists, among others.
3. DOROTHEA SALO
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
SOYLENT SEM-WEB
It’s the year 2013... Data are still the same.
We’ll do anything to make sense of them.
And for that we need PEOPLE.
4. DOROTHEA SALO
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
SOYLENT SEM-WEB PLE!
EO
P
IS
It’s the year 2013... Data are still the same.
We’ll do anything to make sense of them.
And for that we need PEOPLE.
5. SOYLENT SEM-WEB
It’s the year 2013... Data are still the same.
We’ll do anything to make sense of them.
And for that we need LIBRARIANS.
31. 3:
01
T2
SIS
t Auced)
e areprod
lid not
a sl slide
on (actua
en
Se
“RDF is built from XML.”
It’s the year 2013... RDF is still the same.
Why do people who should know better
still believe RDF is based on XML?
32. Rex Pe, “student teacher” CC-BY
http://www.flickr.com/photos/goldendragon613/250121512/
75. Vielen dank!
Dorothea Salo
salo@wisc.edu
This presentation is available under a
Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution
United States license.
Please respect CC licenses on photos if you reuse.