Can social media save
        Wikipedia from itself?
     A system bias influenced social media experience




Sarah Stierch - @sarah_stierch - Social Media Week Hamburg 2013 - #smw13
Can social media save
Wikipedia from itself?
      here are a few facts
9%
                                                                                    *


* Ranges from 9%-13% generally. I've even heard 23%. Regardless, it's depressing.
i'm too busy
                      overwhelming
              WHY?
tried and failed
                 too complex
    it's geeky & uncool
:(
>:(
Ladies <3 social media


●   Bloggers
●   Facebook users
●   Pinteresters
●   Instagramers

● Twitter
Wikipedia & social media
A few things to know:

● @Wikipedia
  ○ 82k followers
  ○ Not social
● Facebook
  ○ +1 million fans.
  ○ Not social
● Blog
  ○ Mainly male contributors
● None of these are used to attract new editors
● Open source means metrics challenges
WikiWomen's Collaborative
● Project inspired by women's
  rights movement of 19th &
  20th century
● Social media is where women
  are
● Social media is free!
● Provide a space for women to
  be themselves; interact with
  & inspire each other, new
  editors
Throw your hands up..
Phase 1

● October
● Focused on building likes &
  followers
● Finding volunteers
● Writing content for social media
  & blog
● Creating a space on meta & logo
● Promoting
Phase 2

● November-January
● Two main goals:
  ○ More new editors
  ○ Make project sustainable
    ■ More multilingual
    ■ WWC + WMF
● Ask a WikiWoman event
● Meta makeover
● New roles for volunteers
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiWomen's_Collaborative
#askawikiwoman
THIS WAS HARD
WikiWomen's Collaborative

● Hard to attract new editors
    ○ PR campaign?
● But, experienced editors like it!
    ○ Majority of Facebook users are editors
    ○ More new potentials on Twitter
●   500+ likes on Facebook!!
●   600+ on Twitter
●   Lots of great blogs
●   Small group of volunteers - more needed
    ○ Hard to crowdsource volunteers
WWC Survey

● Small sample (24)
● Majority active editors
● Majority felt:
  ○ WWC made them feel more connected to community
    (women and general)
  ○ Participants more excited about mission
  ○ Participants more aware of gender gap & how to help
  ○ More like to edit Wikipedia & projects
● But did they?
YES!




 WWC participants started editing more in
              September.

       WWC launched in September.
Mind the gap - reflections
● Social media has helped to
  build a community of
  women who might not
  always communicate on
  wiki
● Culture change can be
  more powerful than tool
  change.
● Women want to socialize
  & create together
● Outreach does matter &
  make a difference
● Not sure if the gap can be
  closed anytime soon.
BE BOLD
Can social media save
        Wikipedia from itself?
     A system bias influenced social media experience
                       Thank you John & Christoph!


                        This entire presentation is:




Sarah Stierch - @sarah_stierch - Social Media Week Hamburg 2013 - #smw13

Can social media save Wikipedia from itself? - Sarah Stierch - Social Media Week Hamburg 2013

  • 1.
    Can social mediasave Wikipedia from itself? A system bias influenced social media experience Sarah Stierch - @sarah_stierch - Social Media Week Hamburg 2013 - #smw13
  • 7.
    Can social mediasave Wikipedia from itself? here are a few facts
  • 8.
    9% * * Ranges from 9%-13% generally. I've even heard 23%. Regardless, it's depressing.
  • 9.
    i'm too busy overwhelming WHY? tried and failed too complex it's geeky & uncool
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 16.
    Ladies <3 socialmedia ● Bloggers ● Facebook users ● Pinteresters ● Instagramers ● Twitter
  • 17.
    Wikipedia & socialmedia A few things to know: ● @Wikipedia ○ 82k followers ○ Not social ● Facebook ○ +1 million fans. ○ Not social ● Blog ○ Mainly male contributors ● None of these are used to attract new editors ● Open source means metrics challenges
  • 18.
    WikiWomen's Collaborative ● Projectinspired by women's rights movement of 19th & 20th century ● Social media is where women are ● Social media is free! ● Provide a space for women to be themselves; interact with & inspire each other, new editors
  • 19.
  • 21.
    Phase 1 ● October ●Focused on building likes & followers ● Finding volunteers ● Writing content for social media & blog ● Creating a space on meta & logo ● Promoting
  • 26.
    Phase 2 ● November-January ●Two main goals: ○ More new editors ○ Make project sustainable ■ More multilingual ■ WWC + WMF ● Ask a WikiWoman event ● Meta makeover ● New roles for volunteers
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
    WikiWomen's Collaborative ● Hardto attract new editors ○ PR campaign? ● But, experienced editors like it! ○ Majority of Facebook users are editors ○ More new potentials on Twitter ● 500+ likes on Facebook!! ● 600+ on Twitter ● Lots of great blogs ● Small group of volunteers - more needed ○ Hard to crowdsource volunteers
  • 31.
    WWC Survey ● Smallsample (24) ● Majority active editors ● Majority felt: ○ WWC made them feel more connected to community (women and general) ○ Participants more excited about mission ○ Participants more aware of gender gap & how to help ○ More like to edit Wikipedia & projects ● But did they?
  • 32.
    YES! WWC participantsstarted editing more in September. WWC launched in September.
  • 33.
    Mind the gap- reflections ● Social media has helped to build a community of women who might not always communicate on wiki ● Culture change can be more powerful than tool change. ● Women want to socialize & create together ● Outreach does matter & make a difference ● Not sure if the gap can be closed anytime soon.
  • 34.
  • 36.
    Can social mediasave Wikipedia from itself? A system bias influenced social media experience Thank you John & Christoph! This entire presentation is: Sarah Stierch - @sarah_stierch - Social Media Week Hamburg 2013 - #smw13