COMMUNITY HERITAGE GRANT
PROGRAM
SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT
TANIA CLEARY
DO’S
• PREPARATION
• ASSESSOR
• ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
• REPORT
• SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
• OUTCOMES
• DON’TS
PREPARATION
• DEFINE THE PURPOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT
• UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPTS AND CRITERIA
• IDENTIFY & ISOLATE THE MATERIAL
• GATHER DOCUMENTATION
• CONTACT PEOPLE TO ASSIST
• PREPARE WORKSPACE
• CHOOSE SUITABLE ASSESSOR
ASSESSOR
SEEK EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE
SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS INCLUDE:
• MUSEUMS AUSTRALIA
• AUSTRALIAN COUNCIL OF PROFESSIONAL
HISTORIANS
• AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF ARCHIVISTS
• AUSTRALIAN LIBRARY AND INFORMATION
ASSOCIATION
• COMMUNITY HERITAGE GRANT COORDINATOR
PRIMARY AND COMPARATIVE
CRITERIA
SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT REPORTS
SOMETIMES DEMONSTRATE INADEQUATE
UNDERSTANDING AND USE OF THE
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
THE SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT MUST INCLUDE
DISCUSSION OF BOTH THE PRIMARY AND
COMPARATIVE CRITERIA
THE SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT
REPORT
FOLLOW THE CHG REPORT TEMPLATE:
http://www.nla.gov.au/chg/significance-
assessments
THE RESULTS OF THE SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT
SHOULD BE VALID AND RELIABLE
THE REPORT WILL BE SCRUTINISED FOR PROCESS
LOGIC AND RIGOUR
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
THE SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT SHOULD CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHY THE
COLLECTION IS SIGNIFICANT. THE BASIS OF ANY STATEMENT IS COMPARATIVE
ASSESSMENT
POOR
THE COLLECTION HAS LOCAL, STATE, NATIONAL AND PERHAPS
INTERNATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE
BETTER
THE COLLECTION HAS LOCAL, STATE AND NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE BECAUSE:
IT CONTAINS RARE AND UNIQUE MATERIAL OF HIGH RESEARCH VALUE, IT
PROVIDES MATERIAL EVIDENCE OF THE COMMUNITY, IT DOCUMENTS THE
HISTORY OF THE ORGANISATION
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
BETTER STILL
THE WHOLE COLLECTION IS HISTORICALLY
SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE IT RECORDS THE
CONTRIBUTION MADE BY ‘X’ TO ‘Y’.
THE COLLECTION COMPRISES RARE PRIMARY AND
SECONDARY SOURCE MATERIALS THAT ARE
CULTURALLY, SOCIALLY AND SPIRITUALLY
SIGNIFICANT TO THE ‘X’ COMMUNITY.
NATIONALLY SIGNIFICANT MATERIALS DOCUMENT
THE DEVELOPMENT OF/ THE IMPORTANCE OF / THE
ROLE OF …
OUTCOMES
SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENTS ENABLE ORGANISATIONS
TO:
• CONSIDER THE COLLECTION IN NEW WAYS
• REAPPRAISE THE COLLECTION’S POTENTIAL
• THINK LONG TERM
• THINK STRATEGICALLY
• REDIRECT RESOURCES INTO MORE EFFICIENT AND
EFFECTIVE COLLECTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS
DONT’S
• DON’T EMPLOY A FRIEND, ASSOCIATE OR
COLLEAGUE AS THE ASSESSOR
• DON’T ACCEPT GENERALISED OR MAYBE
STATEMENTS ABOUT THE SIGNIFICANCE OF
THE COLLECTION
• DON’T UNCONDITIONALLY ACCEPT A REPORT
• DON’T IGNORE THE RECOMMENDATIONS

Significance assessment process - Tania Cleary - 2015

  • 1.
  • 2.
    DO’S • PREPARATION • ASSESSOR •ASSESSMENT CRITERIA • REPORT • SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT • OUTCOMES • DON’TS
  • 3.
    PREPARATION • DEFINE THEPURPOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT • UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPTS AND CRITERIA • IDENTIFY & ISOLATE THE MATERIAL • GATHER DOCUMENTATION • CONTACT PEOPLE TO ASSIST • PREPARE WORKSPACE • CHOOSE SUITABLE ASSESSOR
  • 4.
    ASSESSOR SEEK EXPERIENCE ANDEXPERTISE SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS INCLUDE: • MUSEUMS AUSTRALIA • AUSTRALIAN COUNCIL OF PROFESSIONAL HISTORIANS • AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY OF ARCHIVISTS • AUSTRALIAN LIBRARY AND INFORMATION ASSOCIATION • COMMUNITY HERITAGE GRANT COORDINATOR
  • 5.
    PRIMARY AND COMPARATIVE CRITERIA SIGNIFICANCEASSESSMENT REPORTS SOMETIMES DEMONSTRATE INADEQUATE UNDERSTANDING AND USE OF THE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA THE SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT MUST INCLUDE DISCUSSION OF BOTH THE PRIMARY AND COMPARATIVE CRITERIA
  • 6.
    THE SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT FOLLOWTHE CHG REPORT TEMPLATE: http://www.nla.gov.au/chg/significance- assessments THE RESULTS OF THE SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT SHOULD BE VALID AND RELIABLE THE REPORT WILL BE SCRUTINISED FOR PROCESS LOGIC AND RIGOUR
  • 7.
    SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT THE SIGNIFICANCESTATEMENT SHOULD CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHY THE COLLECTION IS SIGNIFICANT. THE BASIS OF ANY STATEMENT IS COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT POOR THE COLLECTION HAS LOCAL, STATE, NATIONAL AND PERHAPS INTERNATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE BETTER THE COLLECTION HAS LOCAL, STATE AND NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE BECAUSE: IT CONTAINS RARE AND UNIQUE MATERIAL OF HIGH RESEARCH VALUE, IT PROVIDES MATERIAL EVIDENCE OF THE COMMUNITY, IT DOCUMENTS THE HISTORY OF THE ORGANISATION
  • 8.
    SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT BETTER STILL THEWHOLE COLLECTION IS HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE IT RECORDS THE CONTRIBUTION MADE BY ‘X’ TO ‘Y’. THE COLLECTION COMPRISES RARE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SOURCE MATERIALS THAT ARE CULTURALLY, SOCIALLY AND SPIRITUALLY SIGNIFICANT TO THE ‘X’ COMMUNITY. NATIONALLY SIGNIFICANT MATERIALS DOCUMENT THE DEVELOPMENT OF/ THE IMPORTANCE OF / THE ROLE OF …
  • 9.
    OUTCOMES SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENTS ENABLEORGANISATIONS TO: • CONSIDER THE COLLECTION IN NEW WAYS • REAPPRAISE THE COLLECTION’S POTENTIAL • THINK LONG TERM • THINK STRATEGICALLY • REDIRECT RESOURCES INTO MORE EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE COLLECTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS
  • 10.
    DONT’S • DON’T EMPLOYA FRIEND, ASSOCIATE OR COLLEAGUE AS THE ASSESSOR • DON’T ACCEPT GENERALISED OR MAYBE STATEMENTS ABOUT THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE COLLECTION • DON’T UNCONDITIONALLY ACCEPT A REPORT • DON’T IGNORE THE RECOMMENDATIONS