Sustainable development requires multiple transitions across many domains including energy, mobility, food systems, resource use, corporate behavior, governance, knowledge production, lifestyles, and individual mindsets. Achieving sustainability involves balancing economic, social and environmental concerns through complex tradeoffs. Transformative innovation is needed to develop alternative systems, but this faces resistance from incumbent actors and requires changes in both technologies and human values over long periods. Governance must support experimentation while controlling unsustainable practices.
Eng.Dr. Adam M. Sebbit
The East Africa Masterclass at Terrat focused on the village level experience of off-grid energy. We have invited local leaders and rural energy providers from Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, Malawi and Tanzania.
We were keen for village headmen and headwomen to share their village experiences of energy provision and to tell us about the outcomes and impacts of productive energy use in relation to standards of living, education, heath and employment in the village.
The workshop heard from the off grid energy providers about their achievements and challenges in bringing off-grid energy to villages and how they have worked with village leaders and the village community.
David Tyfield: Game-changing Innovation in China STEPS Centre
David Tyfield, Lancaster University.
Presentation to the UK-China Innovation Workshop for Sustainable and Equitable Development, Tsinghua University, 19 March 2010, co-organised by China Institute for Science and Technology Policy (CISTP) at Tsinghua University and the STEPS Centre.
http://anewmanifesto.org/news/china-workshop-presentationschina-workshop-presentations/
Beyond WCEF2017: The European Union advancing a global circular economy in Brussels on 11th of October 2017.
Co-chair UNEP International Resource Panel (IRP), Partner Systemiq
My presentation for the LCS-Rnet and ISAP conference in Yokohama on the need to open up the low carbon agenda, develop more transformative science and new tools
Eng.Dr. Adam M. Sebbit
The East Africa Masterclass at Terrat focused on the village level experience of off-grid energy. We have invited local leaders and rural energy providers from Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, Malawi and Tanzania.
We were keen for village headmen and headwomen to share their village experiences of energy provision and to tell us about the outcomes and impacts of productive energy use in relation to standards of living, education, heath and employment in the village.
The workshop heard from the off grid energy providers about their achievements and challenges in bringing off-grid energy to villages and how they have worked with village leaders and the village community.
David Tyfield: Game-changing Innovation in China STEPS Centre
David Tyfield, Lancaster University.
Presentation to the UK-China Innovation Workshop for Sustainable and Equitable Development, Tsinghua University, 19 March 2010, co-organised by China Institute for Science and Technology Policy (CISTP) at Tsinghua University and the STEPS Centre.
http://anewmanifesto.org/news/china-workshop-presentationschina-workshop-presentations/
Beyond WCEF2017: The European Union advancing a global circular economy in Brussels on 11th of October 2017.
Co-chair UNEP International Resource Panel (IRP), Partner Systemiq
My presentation for the LCS-Rnet and ISAP conference in Yokohama on the need to open up the low carbon agenda, develop more transformative science and new tools
Session 20 comparing the nexus along the mekong gangaCPWF Mekong
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy 2013. Presentation from Session 20: Is the Nexus Secure … and for Whom?: Unpacking Nexus Discourses on Food, Water, and Energy Security in South and Southeast Asia
R&D investment in developing countries to address social challengesJosé Guimón
Why should developing countries invest in R&D and innovation? How can developing countries better align their R&D efforts towards societal needs? How to combine “grand challenge” with “small challenge” initiatives in social innovation? What lessons can be learnt from recent experiences in international R&D cooperation to address societal challenges?
Winner, Best Paper, United States Assoc. for Small Business & Entrepreneurship, usasbe.org Philadelphia 2017. Abstract: Entrepreneurial activity may be inconsistent with the need to conserve the planet and prevent environmental damage. This article provides the theoretical basis for Biosphere Entrepreneurship, which goes beyond business and social entrepreneurship. It theoretically justifies entrepreneurial activity that adds value to Earth. Extending the work of Kuratko, Morris, and Schindehutte on ontological frameworks (2000; 2001; 2015), we combine entrepreneurship, climate change economics, and sustainability research in an attempt to build a theoretical base for biosphere entrepreneurship. In the Implications, we ask, what can educators do to help biosphere entrepreneurs address the existential and catastrophic risks facing humanity?
Executive Summary: This article combines entrepreneurship research with climate economics and sustainability to build a new theory of biosphere entrepreneurship. Going beyond business and social entrepreneurship, which add value to private and community domains, respectively, biosphere entrepreneurship is entrepreneurial activity that adds value to the biosphere and ecosystem services.
The purpose of this article is to devise mental models (frameworks) relating entrepreneurship and climate change to facilitate theory-building. Using images and visual depictions, the article envisions a theoretical model of entrepreneurial ecology or biosphere entrepreneurship showing how the Earth, humanity, and the economy are connected through negative entrepreneurship and positive entrepreneurship. It extends extant frameworks-- entrepreneurial risk and survival frameworks; financial and capital frameworks; entrepreneurial growth frameworks; business model frameworks; socio-cultural frameworks; and entrepreneurial opportunity frameworks—to theoretically justify entrepreneurial activity that adds value to Earth.
The article uses entrepreneurship ontology in the tradition of Kuratko, Morris, and Schindehutte (2000; 2001; 2015) to describe phenomena in a way to identify and classify concepts and relationships about which increasingly are reaching consensus. The purpose is to use ontological framework analysis to convert abstraction into order, prioritize variables, and identify relationships within a new field of biosphere entrepreneurship. We seek candidate frameworks combining the domains of entrepreneurship, climate economics, and sustainability to expand a theory of biosphere entrepreneurship.
The article concludes with implications for entrepreneurship education. If biosphere truly go beyond business entrepreneurs seeking private gain, and social entrepreneurs adding value to social communities, what are educators doing to help our young entrepreneurs see climate change as market failure, identify market opportunities, and come to grips with existential and catastrophic risk?
Session 20 comparing the nexus along the mekong gangaCPWF Mekong
3rd Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy 2013. Presentation from Session 20: Is the Nexus Secure … and for Whom?: Unpacking Nexus Discourses on Food, Water, and Energy Security in South and Southeast Asia
R&D investment in developing countries to address social challengesJosé Guimón
Why should developing countries invest in R&D and innovation? How can developing countries better align their R&D efforts towards societal needs? How to combine “grand challenge” with “small challenge” initiatives in social innovation? What lessons can be learnt from recent experiences in international R&D cooperation to address societal challenges?
Winner, Best Paper, United States Assoc. for Small Business & Entrepreneurship, usasbe.org Philadelphia 2017. Abstract: Entrepreneurial activity may be inconsistent with the need to conserve the planet and prevent environmental damage. This article provides the theoretical basis for Biosphere Entrepreneurship, which goes beyond business and social entrepreneurship. It theoretically justifies entrepreneurial activity that adds value to Earth. Extending the work of Kuratko, Morris, and Schindehutte on ontological frameworks (2000; 2001; 2015), we combine entrepreneurship, climate change economics, and sustainability research in an attempt to build a theoretical base for biosphere entrepreneurship. In the Implications, we ask, what can educators do to help biosphere entrepreneurs address the existential and catastrophic risks facing humanity?
Executive Summary: This article combines entrepreneurship research with climate economics and sustainability to build a new theory of biosphere entrepreneurship. Going beyond business and social entrepreneurship, which add value to private and community domains, respectively, biosphere entrepreneurship is entrepreneurial activity that adds value to the biosphere and ecosystem services.
The purpose of this article is to devise mental models (frameworks) relating entrepreneurship and climate change to facilitate theory-building. Using images and visual depictions, the article envisions a theoretical model of entrepreneurial ecology or biosphere entrepreneurship showing how the Earth, humanity, and the economy are connected through negative entrepreneurship and positive entrepreneurship. It extends extant frameworks-- entrepreneurial risk and survival frameworks; financial and capital frameworks; entrepreneurial growth frameworks; business model frameworks; socio-cultural frameworks; and entrepreneurial opportunity frameworks—to theoretically justify entrepreneurial activity that adds value to Earth.
The article uses entrepreneurship ontology in the tradition of Kuratko, Morris, and Schindehutte (2000; 2001; 2015) to describe phenomena in a way to identify and classify concepts and relationships about which increasingly are reaching consensus. The purpose is to use ontological framework analysis to convert abstraction into order, prioritize variables, and identify relationships within a new field of biosphere entrepreneurship. We seek candidate frameworks combining the domains of entrepreneurship, climate economics, and sustainability to expand a theory of biosphere entrepreneurship.
The article concludes with implications for entrepreneurship education. If biosphere truly go beyond business entrepreneurs seeking private gain, and social entrepreneurs adding value to social communities, what are educators doing to help our young entrepreneurs see climate change as market failure, identify market opportunities, and come to grips with existential and catastrophic risk?
what is the best method to sell pi coins in 2024DOT TECH
The best way to sell your pi coins safely is trading with an exchange..but since pi is not launched in any exchange, and second option is through a VERIFIED pi merchant.
Who is a pi merchant?
A pi merchant is someone who buys pi coins from miners and pioneers and resell them to Investors looking forward to hold massive amounts before mainnet launch in 2026.
I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi merchant to trade pi coins with.
@Pi_vendor_247
how can I sell pi coins after successfully completing KYCDOT TECH
Pi coins is not launched yet in any exchange 💱 this means it's not swappable, the current pi displaying on coin market cap is the iou version of pi. And you can learn all about that on my previous post.
RIGHT NOW THE ONLY WAY you can sell pi coins is through verified pi merchants. A pi merchant is someone who buys pi coins and resell them to exchanges and crypto whales. Looking forward to hold massive quantities of pi coins before the mainnet launch.
This is because pi network is not doing any pre-sale or ico offerings, the only way to get my coins is from buying from miners. So a merchant facilitates the transactions between the miners and these exchanges holding pi.
I and my friends has sold more than 6000 pi coins successfully with this method. I will be happy to share the contact of my personal pi merchant. The one i trade with, if you have your own merchant you can trade with them. For those who are new.
Message: @Pi_vendor_247 on telegram.
I wouldn't advise you selling all percentage of the pi coins. Leave at least a before so its a win win during open mainnet. Have a nice day pioneers ♥️
#kyc #mainnet #picoins #pi #sellpi #piwallet
#pinetwork
how to sell pi coins in South Korea profitably.DOT TECH
Yes. You can sell your pi network coins in South Korea or any other country, by finding a verified pi merchant
What is a verified pi merchant?
Since pi network is not launched yet on any exchange, the only way you can sell pi coins is by selling to a verified pi merchant, and this is because pi network is not launched yet on any exchange and no pre-sale or ico offerings Is done on pi.
Since there is no pre-sale, the only way exchanges can get pi is by buying from miners. So a pi merchant facilitates these transactions by acting as a bridge for both transactions.
How can i find a pi vendor/merchant?
Well for those who haven't traded with a pi merchant or who don't already have one. I will leave the telegram id of my personal pi merchant who i trade pi with.
Tele gram: @Pi_vendor_247
#pi #sell #nigeria #pinetwork #picoins #sellpi #Nigerian #tradepi #pinetworkcoins #sellmypi
What website can I sell pi coins securely.DOT TECH
Currently there are no website or exchange that allow buying or selling of pi coins..
But you can still easily sell pi coins, by reselling it to exchanges/crypto whales interested in holding thousands of pi coins before the mainnet launch.
Who is a pi merchant?
A pi merchant is someone who buys pi coins from miners and resell to these crypto whales and holders of pi..
This is because pi network is not doing any pre-sale. The only way exchanges can get pi is by buying from miners and pi merchants stands in between the miners and the exchanges.
How can I sell my pi coins?
Selling pi coins is really easy, but first you need to migrate to mainnet wallet before you can do that. I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi merchant to trade with.
Tele-gram.
@Pi_vendor_247
Yes of course, you can easily start mining pi network coin today and sell to legit pi vendors in the United States.
Here the telegram contact of my personal vendor.
@Pi_vendor_247
#pi network #pi coins #legit #passive income
#US
how to sell pi coins on Bitmart crypto exchangeDOT TECH
Yes. Pi network coins can be exchanged but not on bitmart exchange. Because pi network is still in the enclosed mainnet. The only way pioneers are able to trade pi coins is by reselling the pi coins to pi verified merchants.
A verified merchant is someone who buys pi network coins and resell it to exchanges looking forward to hold till mainnet launch.
I will leave the telegram contact of my personal pi merchant to trade with.
@Pi_vendor_247
Lecture slide titled Fraud Risk Mitigation, Webinar Lecture Delivered at the Society for West African Internal Audit Practitioners (SWAIAP) on Wednesday, November 8, 2023.
how to swap pi coins to foreign currency withdrawable.DOT TECH
As of my last update, Pi is still in the testing phase and is not tradable on any exchanges.
However, Pi Network has announced plans to launch its Testnet and Mainnet in the future, which may include listing Pi on exchanges.
The current method for selling pi coins involves exchanging them with a pi vendor who purchases pi coins for investment reasons.
If you want to sell your pi coins, reach out to a pi vendor and sell them to anyone looking to sell pi coins from any country around the globe.
Below is the contact information for my personal pi vendor.
Telegram: @Pi_vendor_247
USDA Loans in California: A Comprehensive Overview.pptxmarketing367770
USDA Loans in California: A Comprehensive Overview
If you're dreaming of owning a home in California's rural or suburban areas, a USDA loan might be the perfect solution. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) offers these loans to help low-to-moderate-income individuals and families achieve homeownership.
Key Features of USDA Loans:
Zero Down Payment: USDA loans require no down payment, making homeownership more accessible.
Competitive Interest Rates: These loans often come with lower interest rates compared to conventional loans.
Flexible Credit Requirements: USDA loans have more lenient credit score requirements, helping those with less-than-perfect credit.
Guaranteed Loan Program: The USDA guarantees a portion of the loan, reducing risk for lenders and expanding borrowing options.
Eligibility Criteria:
Location: The property must be located in a USDA-designated rural or suburban area. Many areas in California qualify.
Income Limits: Applicants must meet income guidelines, which vary by region and household size.
Primary Residence: The home must be used as the borrower's primary residence.
Application Process:
Find a USDA-Approved Lender: Not all lenders offer USDA loans, so it's essential to choose one approved by the USDA.
Pre-Qualification: Determine your eligibility and the amount you can borrow.
Property Search: Look for properties in eligible rural or suburban areas.
Loan Application: Submit your application, including financial and personal information.
Processing and Approval: The lender and USDA will review your application. If approved, you can proceed to closing.
USDA loans are an excellent option for those looking to buy a home in California's rural and suburban areas. With no down payment and flexible requirements, these loans make homeownership more attainable for many families. Explore your eligibility today and take the first step toward owning your dream home.
what is the future of Pi Network currency.DOT TECH
The future of the Pi cryptocurrency is uncertain, and its success will depend on several factors. Pi is a relatively new cryptocurrency that aims to be user-friendly and accessible to a wide audience. Here are a few key considerations for its future:
Message: @Pi_vendor_247 on telegram if u want to sell PI COINS.
1. Mainnet Launch: As of my last knowledge update in January 2022, Pi was still in the testnet phase. Its success will depend on a successful transition to a mainnet, where actual transactions can take place.
2. User Adoption: Pi's success will be closely tied to user adoption. The more users who join the network and actively participate, the stronger the ecosystem can become.
3. Utility and Use Cases: For a cryptocurrency to thrive, it must offer utility and practical use cases. The Pi team has talked about various applications, including peer-to-peer transactions, smart contracts, and more. The development and implementation of these features will be essential.
4. Regulatory Environment: The regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies is evolving globally. How Pi navigates and complies with regulations in various jurisdictions will significantly impact its future.
5. Technology Development: The Pi network must continue to develop and improve its technology, security, and scalability to compete with established cryptocurrencies.
6. Community Engagement: The Pi community plays a critical role in its future. Engaged users can help build trust and grow the network.
7. Monetization and Sustainability: The Pi team's monetization strategy, such as fees, partnerships, or other revenue sources, will affect its long-term sustainability.
It's essential to approach Pi or any new cryptocurrency with caution and conduct due diligence. Cryptocurrency investments involve risks, and potential rewards can be uncertain. The success and future of Pi will depend on the collective efforts of its team, community, and the broader cryptocurrency market dynamics. It's advisable to stay updated on Pi's development and follow any updates from the official Pi Network website or announcements from the team.
2. Sustainable development is
• a process of change in which
• the exploitation of resources,
• the directions of investments,
• the orientation of technological development,
• and institutional change
• are all in harmony
• and enhance both current and future potential
• to meet human needs and aspirations’
(WCED, 1987)
3. • Sustainable development ties together
concern for the carrying capacity of
natural systems with the social challenges
facing humanity (poverty, happiness, ..).
• It is about protection (of environmental
amenities) and creation (of well-being and
greater happiness)
4. SD as a balance between economy
environment and social issues
• Economic: An economically sustainable system must be able to
produce goods and services on a continuing basis, to maintain
manageable levels of government and external debt, and to avoid
extreme sectoral imbalances which damage agricultural or industrial
production.
• Environmental: An environmentally sustainable system must
maintain a stable resource base, avoiding over-exploitation of
renewable resource systems or environmental sink functions, and
depleting non-renewable resources only to the extent that investment is
made in adequate substitutes. This includes maintenance of
biodiversity, atmospheric stability, and other ecosystem functions not
ordinarily classed as economic resources.
• Social: A socially sustainable system must achieve distributional
equity, adequate provision of social services including health and
education, gender equity, and political accountability and participation.
(Jonathan M. Harris, June 2000)
5. SD as a moral obligation
• A just, more equitable world, in which hunger is
eleminated, people have access to basic services
(including education), are not excluded from decision-
making, in which income is distributed more equally,
in which there is an ethos of responsibility and
respect for others, including nature and animals.
6. Sustainability values
• Recognition of interdependence
• Self-determination
• Diversity and tolerance
• Compassion for others
• Upholding the principle of equity
• Recognition of the rights and interests of non-humans
• Respect for the integrity of natural systems
• Respect for the interests of future generations
(Porritt, 2007, p. 314)
7. Strong and weak sustainability
• SD as non-decreasing welfare (Pezzey 1989,
1992) )
• Environmental losses are accepted as long as
they are compensated by economic gains
(weak sustainability)
8. SD is subjective and normative
• Sustainable development derives from social
consensus on what we consider to be unsustainable
and what constitutes progress, something that will
differ across nations and localities.
• “SD is political concept, replete with governance
questions” (Farrell et al. 2005)
9. Domain definitions
• In the case of energy, there is a consensus that
renewable energy is sustainable (non renewable
energy is viewed as non-sustainable)
• There is no agreed definition of what sustainable
mobility is
• In the case of agro-food, we have disagreement
about organic farming being sustainable (having to
do with the larger land requirements).
10. Different valid viewpoints
• Climate change is happening / is an unproven scientific
theory
• Geo-engineering is an attractive / dangerous way of
dealing with climate change
• The risks of nuclear power are something to be
contained (through risk control) or avoided
• With time substitutes for depletable resources will be
found vs we should recycle materials
• We are working too much vs we are not working hard
enough
• …
12. Sustainable development
• Is a universalist notion
• Whose translation in practical action is
contested (because of practical implications
and different values)
13. Do we need the term SD?
• What does SD as a universalist and practically
contested concept add?
14. SD makes us reflect about
• Our needs and priorities
• The link between natural environment, economy
and society
• Long-term system effects
• Risks
• Whether gains in one area are achieved at the cost
of something else
• Reforms, principles for decision-making
15. My own argument
• There are no technological solutions to SD
(sustainable technologies do not exist!)
• SD is an ongoing process that requires multiple
transitions in:
– Energy, mobility and food systems
– Resource use
– Corporate behaviour
– Governance
– Knowledge production
– Hearts and minds of people
– People’s lifestyles
16. • For every complex problem, there is a solution
that is simple, neat, and wrong ... (attributed to H.
L. Mencken)
• “One has to make up his mind whether he wants
simple answers to his questions – or useful ones…
….you cannot have both” Joseph Schumpeter
17. About capitalism
• Capitalism is often viewed as the culprit of the
ecological crisis
– It is efficiently serving consumer needs, giving
people what they want, versus
– It is fuelling desire and is associated with
exploitation of nature and people
• What we need is a Capitalism as if the world
matters (Jonathan Porritt) and saner, more
sustainable forms of growth (Dani Rodrik)
19. What business is doing in terms
of SD
• Cleaner production
• Greener products
• Environmental management and auditing
systems (EMAS)
• Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
• Charity (community work)
20.
21. Figuur 1: Motivaties voor duurzaamheidsacties in bedrijven (Bron: McKinsey Global Survey
results How companies manage sustainability, p. 3)[1]
[1] https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/PDFDownload.aspx?ar=2558
Motivaties voor duurzaamheidsacties in bedrijven
Bron: McKinsey Global Survey results How companies manage sustainability, p. 3
22. CSR has been evaluated negatively
• The incremental approach of CSR has not made any impact on the
massive sustainability crises that the world faces, many of which are
worsening at a pace that far outstrips any CSR-led attempts at
improvement.
• CSR is usually a peripheral corporate function, even when a company
has a CSR manager or a CSR department. Shareholder-driven capitalism
is pervasive, and its goal of short-term financial measures of progress
contradicts the long-term stakeholder approach to capitalism that is
needed for CSR to have any meaningful results.
• Despite the rhetoric about the “business case for CSR, as practiced at
the beginning of the twenty-first century, CSR remains uneconomical.
Most of the difficult CSR changes that are needed to reverse the misery
of poverty and mass species extinction require strategic change and
massive investment. These necessary changes may be lucrative in the
long term and economically rational over a generation or two, but the
financial markets do not work this way—at least not yet.
Bron: Visser
26. Examples of “sustainability
transitions”
• In energy: moving to renewables (solar PV, CSP,
biofuels, geothermal, hydro, …
• In mobility: bicycles, modal shift, intermodality,
green cars, reducing the need for transport
• In waste management: waste prevention,
recycling and re-use
• Resource efficiency as a cross-cutting challenge
27. A typology of innovation
Adapted from Abernathy and Clark (1985)
28. Transformative innovation
• Is broad in scope and radical in character
• It is about the implementation of a system-wide
novelty (system innovation)
• It involves a wide diversity of actors and often takes
decades to move from margins to mainstream
• It is dynamic and non-standardised
• It is disruptive from the viewpoint of incumbent
actors (including users)
Source: Fred Steward, Breaking the Boundaries.Transformative change
for the Common Good, 2008
29. Possemarré (DE)
• Passive homes with heat exchange system (100 m
deep)
• New destination of old factory
• Located near public transport hubs to Dusseldorf
and Wuppertal
• Urban element in green environment (Neadertal)
• Different age groups
• Working and living
• KFW loans for eco-houses
30. DESERTEC
• Concentrating Solar Thermal Power (CSP)
plants in the Sahara-desert
• Parabolic mirrors heat oil in troughs to 500 C
• Clean electrical power that can be transmitted
via High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC)
transmission lines with relatively little
transmission loss to Europe (10-15%).
• Heat storage tanks (e.g., molten salt tanks)
• Waste heat may be used to desalinate sea water.
• An element in HVDC- supergrid across Europe
31.
32. Bike – train
integration (NL)
• Public bike at railway stations
• 3€ per day, 10 € subscription
• Bikes serviced and stalled
• 1 million trips in 2011, large share of business
trips
34. Mobility management
• Economic incentives and information
systems to reduce car traffic of workers
(no free parking place, public transport
subscription instead of a leased car, ..)
• Public-private covenants
• Flexible working hours
• Mobility budgets and cards, with
automatic billing
39. Sustainability gains may be found
within existing regimes and in
alternative regimes
• Fossil fuels use can be made more sustainable:
– Carbon capturing and sequestering
– Fuel efficient ICE cars
– Weatherproofing of homes
– ...
• But we should also explore alternative trajectories
in a prudent way
40. Themes about transformative
innovation
• They are about systems
• Sociotechnical elements
• Multiple configurations (non-standardised)
• There are dynamic
• Sustainability benefits have to be secured and not just
taken for granted
• From small steps to step change (hybrid forms,
branching, new combinations, ..)
41. Public bike
system
developments
• Mobility card option
• Company bikes
• Electric bikes, scooters widening the range of access
points
• From an alternative to public transport to an
alternative to cars
• Public bikes at P+R sites
• Smart phones to find public bike locations
• Effective ways to deal with thefts and vandalism
• …
42. Sustainable technologies do not exist!
• All technologies have “sustainability” problems;
the challenge for policy, business and society is to
find configurations that are least problematic
• Impacts are not technology-inherent but depend
on use and on what is being done with the product
that is displaced (example of refrigerator)
• There are rebound effects
43. • They require land, critical materials, create
dependencies,..
Renewables suffer from
sustainability problems
44. Sustainability transitions
include two challenges
1. A long-term change to alternative
technologies and infrastructures,
2. Ensuring that values and consumer
criteria change in the same move.
(Kemp and van Lente, 2011)
45. The first challenge
• Transformative change is disruptive, causing
resistance from powerful companies and users
• Regime-changing options compete with regime-
improving options in an unlevel playing field
– ETS favours the co-burning of biomass;
– consumers favour fuel-efficient cars over electric cars
for reasons of costs and range)
• Hybrid forms and fit-stretch patterns offer a way
out
46. The second challenge
• Renewables have their own set of problems: visual
intrusion (wind power), high costs (solar PV), energy
security (CSP from deserts), ..
• Better and more cheap public transport promotes mobility,
public bike compete with public transport, not with cars.
• Sustainable energy is about sustainable use of
renewables and sustainable mobility is about reducing car
mobility;
• The second challenge adds costs and difficulties to the
first challenge
47. Looking at different transitions
• In the transitions to modern sanitation and water
management, sustainability benefits were achieved but
also missed
• In the ongoing transition to sustainable mobility, the
issue of material-intensity of mobility and excessive
mobility are not being addressed
• It will be very difficult to address these: Efforts to
facilitate sustainable mobility may need to be
reconciled with rival societal aspirations such as the
pursuit of faster and more convenient forms of travel
(Cohen, 2010)
48. A transition in governance
• Alternative systems of provision require a change
in governance:
– New systems of provision as an orientation point for
governance actors (government, business, CSO)
– Less power for vested interests and less reliance on regime-
preserving solutions
– More reflexive forms of governance oriented towards
learning, experimentation and adaptation
– Firm control of what is not sustainable: to phase out what is
not sustainable and create space for alternatives
49. • Transformative innovation presents a difficult
issue for policy as it involves substantive risky
investments, conflicts between emergent and
incumbent actors and reconfiguring the traditional
sectoral and policy boundaries (Steward, 2008)
• At present neither innovation policy nor
sustainability policy are configured to allow a
serious pursuit of transformative innovation
50. • “Bij alle definities en omschrijvingen van duurzaamheid
(…) wordt voorbij gegaan aan moeilijke afwegingen en
keuzes. Er wordt gesproken in termen van een ´balans`,
het voldoen aan het een zonder dat dit ten koste gaat van
het ander, zoveel mogelijk positiefs en zo weinig mogelijk
negatiefs, enzovoorts. Duurzaamheid is een soort vredig
eindbeeld. Duurzame ontwikkeling daarentegen, het proces
om dichter bij dat eindbeeld te komen, draait om het
maken van prioriteiten, lastige afwegingen en pijnlijke
keuzes.”
(Flor Avelino)
51. A transition in values
• More responsible & communal
• Less materialistic
• Self-improvement
• Sufficiency
52. About materialistic values
• People who are highly focused on materialistic values have lower
personal well-being and psychological health than those who believe
that materialistic values are relatively unimportant.
• When needs for security, safety and sustenance are not satisfied,
people place a strong focus on materialistic values and desires.
Insecurity also makes it likely that people will pursue materialistic
aims, as both inner predispositions and external consumer culture
suggest that resources and purchase security.
• People with a strong materialistic orientation are likely to watch a lot
of television, compare themselves unfavourably with people whom
they see on television, be dissatisfied with their standard of living
and have low life satisfaction.
• People who hold materialistic aims as central tot heir values have
shorter, more conflicting relationships with friends and lovers.
• People believe in materialism because society is so materialistic, and
society is so materialistic because many people believe that
materialistic pursuits are a path to happiness.
(Kasser, 2002)
53. Sufficiency as a positive
• “In a society devoted to ever-greater consumption, it is
hard not to identify sufficiency with notions of sacrifice,
of ‘doing without’ or ‘giving things up’. Such
identifications are, however, misplaced. Certainly,
sufficiency implies relatively modest consumption and
simplicity in personal lifestyle. But these are not motivated
by abstract aestheticism or self-denial, but arise from a
perception that sufficiency in consumption permits a
greater emphasis to be placed on other aspects of
human experience, which are actually more personally
rewarding and fulfilling than consumption”
(Paul Ekins, 1998)
54. A transition in life styles and habits
• Slow time
• Eating less meat
• Refraining from high-mobility life
• Better work-family balance
• More mindful (less poverty of mind)
• Doing things that are meaningful
55. Going green: what we can usefully do
• Respect all life and renew your bond with nature and its
biodiversity (Self)
• Improve your environmental awareness and knowledge
(Self)
• Practise the 3 "Rs" - Reduce, Reuse, Recycle (Self)
• Spread the environmental message and influence others
(Family/Friends/School/Work/Group)
• Support local environmental initiatives and groups
(Community/Local Environment)
• Use your rights as citizens and consumers
(Community/Local Environment
Source: Jonathon Porritt
56. Conclusions
• Sustainable development as the “wholly grail” can never
be reached; it constitutes an ever-continuing quest
(struggle) for societies and for individuals
• SD as a progressive goal is a difficult concept for policy
because it is normative, elusive, and involves contradictory
requirements of support and control
• Innovation may help us get closer to sustainable
development goals but for sustainable development there
are no engineering solutions, nor are their management
principles through which sustainability development can
be achieved
57. A plea for guided evolution
Based on visions of progress but relying on
evolutionary change in the form of ‘darwinistic’
processes of variation and selection rather than
blueprints.
Sustainable development requires wishful
thinking but wishful thinking is also a
recipe for disappointment.