Saving Hinduism from the brink of extinction: Major General V S Karnik (Retd).

1 | P a g e
Why This Booklet?
This booklet is based on articles and e mails from all the Patriots,
who are, mostly very senior citizens of the Patriots Forum. The
contents of this booklet are for the information of all Hindus, in
general and young generation of Hindus, in particular, so that they
understand what happened to Hindus in the History, what
happened after Independence and what is happening now.
Hindus’ attitude is very casual to what wrong is happening around
them. Hindus’, attitude is generally, “Sab Chalta Hai”. With this,
very soon, it may so happen that Hindus may be obliterated from

2 | P a g e
this land, known as “Bharatvarsh”. It is high time we Hindus realize
this and corrective actions are taken.
It is our sincere request that the messages, given in this booklet,
are spread to all Hindus.
[Compiled and Edited by Major General (Dr) VS Karnik
(Veteran from Gorkha Rifles), PhD (Management)]
26 Jan 2018

3 | P a g e
Great Open War, by Muslims,
against Hindus of India.
Do you think that some of the Indian Muslims have already started
open war against Hindus of India?Some Hindus think so.In that case ,
such Indian Muslims’, likely Vision /Mission/ and Methodologies are
given in the succeeding paragraphs.
Vision ---To create India,as a Muslim country. (Dar al Islam---House of
Islam, where Muslims, prevail. )
Mission. ---
 To create demographic imbalance in India in such a way that Muslims
have 25 %of MP in Lok sabha and MLAs in states.
 To ensure Jihad against Hindus.
 To have terrorist organizations, function effectively at all levels from
district to National
 To create terror in the minds of Hindus by all means including promoting
ISIS activities.
 To deceive all Hindus to promote their vision.
 Take help of Pakistan and Bangladesh countries and other Muslim
countries to achieve the vision
 To ensure that all the teachings of Koran are made applicable throughout
India
Methodology---
1. Increase population of Muslims. Every family must have minimum eight
children. Ensure Hindus concept of “Love Jihad” is implement in all
rural and urban areas in all strata of the society.
2. Increase---Invite, protect and ensure settlement of Muslims especially
from Bangladesh and Pakistans in India. Encourage people like
Rohangiya Muslims to get them in India..
3. Madarsa: Ensure Madarsas are the training ground to propagate war
against Hindus. Madarsa be considered as fortress to hide weapons
and cash.
4. Infiltrate all organizations of Govt of India, Universities, Student unions
etc, including Armed forces and Police covertly and overtly. This can
be done by assuming Hindus name and hiding identity as Muslims.

4 | P a g e
5. Take help of Political parties like congress, TMC, SP, and Communist
who are already sympathetic to Muslims and becoming members of
such parties to eventually have political control of India.
6. Ensure we keep our vote bank intact.
7. Carry out terrorist activities by such organizations, as SIMI, IM
etc.Raise more such organization. Help ISIS. Create “sleeping cells
‘and “NO Go “Muslim areas.
8. Take help from Muslim Countries, financially, morally, and physically.
9. Keep all Government at National and state level, under pressure by
placing various demands for the community, like reservation, favorable
treatment to minorities etc.
10. Ensure show of strength by carrying out morchas, Bandhs, meetings in
big cities and thus indirectly terrorize Hindu population and the
government. This has been done successfully, in the past.
11. Celebrate Birth days and Death anniversaries of all Muslim
personalities of Indian History right from Mohamed Ghori to Kasab
Afzal, en mass to show Muslim solidarity and create fear of Muslim in
Hindus.
12. Contributing factors: -- Make use of history how we ruled India for
1000years.Use” modern Jaichands”, to our advantages. There are
plenty of modern Jaichands in India. Lure them to work for us by way
of “Sam, Dam, Dand and Bhed.”
13. Control Media, including social media. Use planned and effective
propaganda
14. Make use of constitution of India, which is favorable to minority and
quote/use it frequently, as there are lots of” holes”, in it.
---------------------------------------------------xxx----------------------------------------------
OUR HISTORY SINCE INVANSION OF MUSLIMS, BACKGROUND TO
THIS SITUATION AND HAPPENING AFTER INDIPENDENCE TILL DATE
AND OTHER ISSUES: Understand what happened, what is happening, and
why it is happening.
In the life of our nation, that is Bharat, Muslims have treated us brutally,
mentally and physically for nearly 900 years. They all came as invaders,
looted us, took our wealth, women and children, converted Hindus, forcibly
to Islam. They destroyed our cultural heritage, religious books and temples
and then on the broken temple sites, they built their monuments, like Babri
Masjid etc. Very few Hindus resisted them, effectively. These are historical
facts and documented.

5 | P a g e
The depth and the scope of holocaust, which befell upon, Hindus, are, so
staggering, that common human mind fails to understand this and goes
blank. Murderous Muslims laid siege to glorious Bharatvarsha almost 1400
years ago and by treacherous and totally subhuman techniques succeeded
in destruction and plunder of the greatest civilization that humanity has
known so far. The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest
story in history
The Muslim conquests were, for the Hindus, a pure struggle between life and
death. Entire cities were burnt down and their populations massacred. Each
successive.campaign brought hundreds of thousands of victims and similar
numbers were deported as slaves. Every new invader made often literally
“hill of Hindu skulls.” Thus, the conquestof Afghanistan in the year 1000 was
followed by the annihilation of the entire Hindu population there; indeed, the
region is still called Hindu Kush, 'Hindu slaughter'. The Bahmani sultans, in
central India made it a rule to kill 100 thousand Hindus a year. In 1399,
Teimur the lame, is said to have killed a 100,000 Hindus IN A SINGLE DAY
and that according to his own Muslim historians
The Hindu population decreased by 8O Million, between the year 1000 and
1525. We will never be able to assess the immense physical harm done to
India by the Muslim invasions. Even more difficult is to estimate the moral
and the spiritual damage done to Hindu India.
The Islamic invaders did not only destroy countless temples and
constructions but also suppressed cultural and religious practices, damaged
the heart of the Indian religion. The Hindus, suffered immense psychological
damage.
Unfortunately, though we were ruled by Muslims for over 900 years, Hindus
are still ignorant what is written in Koran, which is the guiding book for
massacre and conversion of Hindus. These are given below. If you notice,
the behaviorpattern of Muslims in India, individually, and collectively,
irrespective of, whether he is poor/rich, educated/uneducated, his
position in the society, are BASEED ON TEACHINGS OF KORAN:--
THE CONCEPT BEHIND MASS KILLING
Muslims ruled us for 1000 years thattoo ruthlessly; therefore, we must
know the reasons for such ruthlessness. The concept of such
atrocities and mass murder is found in the directions given in their
religious book Koran and Hadith. Unless we are aware of what it says,
we are living in fool’s paradise. These are given in succeeding

6 | P a g e
paragraphs and whererequired, references have been given, to prove
the authenticity
Muhammad is the author and founder of Islam. His book, the Quran, as
expanded in the traditions (Hadith) and codified in the legal code (Sharia)
provides a complete system for the governance of Muslims and for the
subjugation, exploitation, and persecution of infidels. The Mohammedan
conceptstarts first with the division of the world into two domains, the
Dar al Islam (House of Islam), where Muslims prevail, and the Dar al
Harb (House of War) where the infidels(Non-Muslims) prevail People
from Dar al Herb are to be converted to Islam or else attacked,
subdued, killed, enslaved. The ultimate goal, today, as fourteen centuries
ago, remains the same, namely all of mankind to be brought under the
dominion of Muhammad's god and its followers. His cosmology is marked
next with the division of mankind into two sorts - Muslims, "the best of
nations raised up for the benefitof men" (Surah 3: 110) and non-believers or
infidels, "the vilest of animals" (Surah 8: 55). Given this perspective of the
world and its inhabitants, the fate of all nonbelievers, follows its ordained
course - oblivion that from the Muslims' viewpoint is the natural order of the
universe and the ultimate good The Quran defines Muslims as "the best of
nations raised up to instruct all others". In Islam there is no equality
between Muslim and infidel.
Certain Quotes from Kuran
1. Slay the idolaters wherever you find them. 9:5
2. Those who submit and convert to Islam will be treated well. (Those who
don't submit will be killed. See previous verse.) 9:6
3. Don't make treaties with non-Muslims. They are all evildoers and should
not be trusted. 9:7-9
4. Treat converts to Islam well. (Kill those who refuse to convert. See 9:5)
9:11
5. Fight the disbelievers! Allah is on your side; he will give you victory.
9:12-14
6. Don't let idolaters tend the sanctuaries. Their works are in vain and they
will be burned in the Fire. 9:17
On Terror

7 | P a g e
1. We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they
set up with Allah that for which He has sent down no authority and their
abode is the fire, and evil is the abode of the unjust. 8:12
2. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike
off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.
On Unbelievers
1. And slay them wherever ye catch them. 9:191
2. Then fight in Allah’s cause - Thou art held responsible only for thyself -
and rouse the believers. It may be that Allah will restrain the fury of the
Unbelievers; for Allah is the strongest in might and in punishment.4:84
3. And never will Allah grant to the unbelievers a way (to triumphs) over
the believers. 4:141
4 I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their
necks and smite all their fingertips off them. 8:12
5 Prophet! Rouse the Believers to the fight. If there are twenty amongst
you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred: if a
hundred, they will vanquish a thousand of the Unbelievers. 8:65
6 Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that
forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor
acknowledge the religion of Truth.9:29
7 Unless ye go forth, (for Jihad) He will punish you with a grievous
penalty, and put others in your place; but Him ye would not harm in the
least.9:39
8 Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods;for
theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause,
and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the
Law, the Gospel, and the Quran.9:11
9 So obey not the disbelievers, but strive against them herewith with a
great endeavor.25:52
10 Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their
necks; At length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond
firmly (on them): thereafter (is the time for) either generosityor ransom:
Until the war lays down its burdens. 47:4

8 | P a g e
Hadith
The following quotes are from “SAHIH Al-Bukhari”.Al Bukhari is accepted by
most Muslims as the authentic words of Mohammad: ----
1.No Muslim should be killed for killing a kafir (infidel) Vol 9:50
2.The person who participates in (holy war) in Allah’s cause and
nothing compels him to do so expectbelief in Allah and his apostle, will
be compensated, by Allah either with reward or booty (if he survive) or
will be admitted in the paradise (if he is killed)—vol 1:35
3.Fight who believe not in Allah, nor the last day, nor acknowledge the
religion of truth of the people of the book until they pay Jizya (taxes)
with willing submission and feel themselves subdued’ :Surha 9:29
Certain Teaching and Beliefs of Islam;--
1. Muslim must abide by Islamic law irrespective which country he
belongs.
2. If laws are against saying of Koran and Hadith, and when the rulers are
not from Muslim nation, in that case, Muslim should not be loyal to that
nation.
3. In Islam Muslim community or society (Umma) has very important
place. Muslim community is more important than individuals and
Nation and it is Muslims duty to be loyal to Umma.
4. It is permitted in Islam to spread Muslim religion with the help of
“sword”.
5. Islam does not recognize nation’s border. Muslims loyalty is
towards the Islam society.
6. Muslims are proud of that nation which is ruled by Muslim.
Muslims loyalty is outside country. The other fallout of this is
there is no respectfor countries law. Muslim considers that their
law is bigger than countries law. Other belief is that Muslims are
always victorious.
7. Muslims hate idol worshippers. Idol worshipper (i.e. Hindus) are
considered greatest enemies of Islam.
8. Muslims,majority of them, desire to establish global Islamic rule
and it advocates jihad against kafirs or non-believers of Islam.

9 | P a g e
Jihad –It is a religious war against kafirs (those not Muslims are
kafirs)Jihad is every Muslims duty. Religious Islamic institutions
are (like Madarasa) ultimate truth.
9. As per Muslims, Islam, religion is beneficial to whole world
irrespective of nation –age-environment—situation
10. Islam is divided world in two parts, Dar-al-Islam (Land of Islam)
and Dar-al-Harb (Land of enemy)—Where Muslims are not ruling,
that land is considered as enemy land.In such land Muslims have
two choices. ---First is to leave that country (known as hizarat) or
secondly conduct Jihad, and establish Muslim ruler
11. Jews and christens are closer to Muslim (compare to Hindus) and are
known as Dhimmi (means protected people). Other non-Muslims are
Kafirs. Kafir has to choose between Koran and sword.
12. In Islam brotherhood is only for Muslims.
13. Muslims,do not regard themselves as conquerors of the lands of
the infidels, but their liberators. Thatis based on the premise that
the lands,people and property of the entire world belong to Allah
and his followers and that they are merely taking possession of
what is rightfully theirs.
14. The author, Bat Ye'or, states the case well, in her book, “Islam
and Dhimmitude,” as follows:
The general basic principles according to the Koran are as follows:
(a) The pre-eminence of Islam over all other religions [Surah 9: 33];
(b) Islam is the true religion of Allah [Surah 3; 17] and it should reign
over all mankind [Surah 34; 27];
(c) The umma forms the party of Allah and is perfect [Surah 3; 6],
having been chosen above all peoples on earth, it alone is
qualified to rule, and thus elected by Allah to guide the world
[Surah 35; 37]. The pursuit of jihad, until this goal will be
achieved, is an obligation [Surah 8; 40].
(d) Islamic Waqf means a charitable trustor foundation,the assets of
which consistof land and other property,which are designated in
perpetuity for the benefit of the named class of Muslim
beneficiaries. Muslim believe that the entire world, its people, land
and assets, as the property of Allah and his followers. Accordingly,
when Muslims conquer any territory of infidels, they are merely

10 | P a g e
asserting rightful ownership of that which is already theirs. The land is
impressed with an Islamic WAQF or trust for the benefit of the umma
for all time. Thus the property rights of the conquered infidels,devolves
from legal and equitable ownership of Muslims. The purpose of these
constraints is today what it has always been, namely 1) to transfer
wealth from infidels to the umma, 2) to pressure the infidels to convert
to Islam, or 3) to encourage the infidels' departure from the House of
Islam. If the conquered land is once again recovered by its inhabitants,
it still remains Islamic waqf, forever, even though the Muslims are no
longer in control.
(e) Lands such as Israel, southeastern Europe, Sicily, Sardinia,
Russia and India - all formerly under Muslim dominion - remain
subject to Islamic waqf and the Muslims have the moral duty to
seek to re-conquer such lands. The doctrine of Islamic WAQF is
the basis of Islamic neo-imperialism.
(f) Between the two abodes of mankind Dar-al-Islam (Land of
Islam)and Dar-al-Harb (Land of enemy)— perpetual war called
jihad reigns. All Muslims are called to jihad as a moralmandate to
subdue the House of War and establish the universal rule of
Islam, Khilafah.
(g) All Muslim society everywhere is contained in the "Umma", the
universalbrotherhoodof Muslims.In the early centuriesfollowing
Muhammad the Umma was led by the "Khalifa", the Commander
of the Faithful, as the successor of Muhammad, in whom all
matters of religion and state were combined.
(h) Islam, then as now, sees no distinction between the religion and
the state.
(i) Islam does not acknowledge civil rights.
----------------------------------------------xxx---------------------------------------------
BRITISH RULE AND AFTER INDEPENDENCE
1. There was NO combined resistance by Hindus as there was NO unity
amongst them. Disunity amongst, Hindus was the main reason for our
defeats after defeats.

11 | P a g e
2. Then came Britishers and they ruled us for two hundred years. They did
the same what Muslims did, to us. They robbed our nation, converted
Hindus to Christianity, destroyed our culture, introduced new education
system to ensure that we were their slaves, massacred us during the
war of Independence,1857.They created famine situation in Bengal
during WWII, and lakhs of people died. They divided our country into
India and Pakistan, with more land given to Pakistan, with connivance
with some congress Indian leaders and we, Hindus, as slaves mentality,
meekly accepted.
3. It is amazing that:
(a) Pakistan was created for Muslims, but many Muslims stayed
(requested to stay!!) in India, after partition. Hindus were forced out
of Pakistan, after looting and raping them, by Muslims, during
partition. Hindus never objected.
(b) Government of India nurtured Muslims for the last 70 years, like a
small child is nurtured. . Hindus never objected
(c) Muslims were given special treatment by the Government of India
.Hindus never objected.
(d) Muslims were given special privileges .Hindus never objected.
(e) Muslims are still being nurtured. Muslims are still being given
special treatment by the Government of India. Muslims are still,
been given special privileges. Hindus are still not objecting.
4. Muslims, who were given shelter, in India, by Hindus, now have started
considering themselves as privileged class and treating Hindus, like
slaves, and Hindus are accepting it and NOT objecting.
5. After Independence we were ruled for nearly 65 years by Muslim
dynasty, known as Nehru and Gandhi (Indira etc.) family--- and
Congress party .Congress party and its Muslim leaders and politicians
deliberately allowed crores of Bangladeshi Muslims to infiltrate into India
and were allowed to settle them formally by issuing documents. This
was to create vote bank. The Indian constitution made by Congress
party is suspect.
6. During partition, Hindus who were in Pakistan were persuaded by M K
Gandhi and Nehru to remain in Pakistan, clearly knowing that eventually
this Hindu population will be eliminated. This happened.

12 | P a g e
7.Perusing and requesting by MKG and Nehru that Muslim population
should stay in Indian , instead of migrating to Pakistan, the country they
demanded ,knowing well that eventually Muslims( as per teachings of
Islam) will dominate in affairs of India and Hindus, which is happening.
8. Other reasons to substantiate the claim that we were ruled by Muslims,
and Muslim favoring Congress party, and favored Pakistan, after
partition/independence, are as under:
 Nehru, took the J & K issue to UNO, in spite of Indian Army was
winning and Indian Army, wanted just one month more, to capture
whole of J & K . Result is that this problem is still on our back.
a) During 1971 war, Indira Gandhi returned one lakh Pakistan PWO
just on a platter, instead of hard bargaining.
b) Terrorist were released in exchange of abducted Muslims related
VIP Muslim Politicians. This was stage managed. Terrorist were
also released as a good will gesture towards Pakistan.
c) Indo Pak water treaty was heavily skewed towards benefit of
Pakistan.
(Thus Nehru, Indira Gandhi helped Pakistan. )
d) Laws were passed favoring Muslim. Appointment of Sachhar
committee was aimed to help Muslims to show their “plight”, and
then showering on Muslim various financial grants.
e) Flourishing of Madarsas, legal and illegal, aided by foreign
countries, were ignored by Congress government, even it was
known that illegal anti national lessons were taught to the
students.
f) Prominent Hindu political leaders were harassed / jailed/
eliminated, like Savarkar, Shama Prasad Mukerjee, Modi ets.
Even Hindu leaders from Congress party, who were threat to
Muslim Gandhi family, were eliminated.
g) Looted our wealth .The examples being G2 and so many
corruption scams. This includes Bofor scam, which is now
connected with favores and help from Pakistan by the then, PM
Rajiv Gandhi. Crores of rupees were offered to keep Gandhi family
name out of bofor scam. This is the latest revelation.( Source—
Republic TV news since 17 Oct 2017)
h) Officially announcing that minorities (Muslims and Christians) have
first right to the resourses of India, by then PM , Manmohan Singh,
who was puppet of Sonia Gandhi.

13 | P a g e
i) Passing law that Hindu temples will be managed by govt and the
income from temple was used for helping in running madarasa
and subsidizing Haj.
j) Allowing having many radical Muslims pockets, as localities, as
“No Go Areas” in Major cities of India known as “Mini Pakistan”.
k) Generally assisting Muslims and Christian, particularly Muslims, to
spread their religion, to increase their voters. The methods allowed
were conversion of Hindus by force/coercion or bribing them, and
allowing illegal Muslim migrants into India, and assisting them to
settle them in India
l) Ignoring offensive utterances of Muslim political leaders and
Muslim religious leaders, against India, Hindu Gods, and Hindu
culture. At times utterance was “to eliminate Hindus and making
this country a Muslim country.”
m) Allowing Muslim population to increase by various means.
n) Favoring Muslim festivals for their celebrations and curbing
celebrating Hindus festivals by various methods, by passing illegal
laws and orders
o) Not taking firm action against Muslim anti Indian Muslin
organization on some pretext. The main excuse put forward is “
the law will take its own course”. At times, the Judiciary
institutions are also favoring Muslims unwarranted cause.
p) Granting favors financially or otherwise to Muslims.
t) Congress leaders( Rahul Gandhi, Mani Shankar Aier, Ex Vice
President of India, who is Muslim, Ex foreign Minister of India who
is Muslim,Home Minister Shinde, all from Congress party,)
publically stated that Hindus are greater threat than Muslim
Terrorist and Naxilites.
t) Congress govt never restored demolished Hindu temples, never
changed Muslim names of cities and streets.
u) Congress and Muslim dynasty (Nehru and Indira Gandhi) fudged
the correct history of our nation.
v) Draft bill prepared by Sonia Gandhi and congress party, known as
w) Prevention of communal and Targeted violence bill(PCTV Bill,
which was most dangerous bill for Hindus. Luckily it got shelved
due to election. Please read the Appx regarding this bill.
(There are so many more instances that Nehru, Gandhi family and
Congress party favored Muslims)

14 | P a g e
9. At this stage it is relevant to mention that conversation of Hindus to
Muslim and Christianity is continuing systematically, with, planned
deliberations and efforts. The examples are in W Bengal and, Kerala.
NE states are completely converted into Christianity.( Nehru was
instrument in creating “inner Line “for the NE states thus depriving NE
people from joining main stream of the nation. Mass conversion to
Christianity, in NE Region, was ignored.)This has happened when
congress was ruled by Muslims leaders and Christian leaders (Sonia
Gandhi). In this connection, a relevant remark, stated by Swami
Vivekananda is worth remembering. Swami Vivekananda had rightly
said, “For every convert, that is lost to Hinduism, it is not just one lost,
but one more enemy to Hinduism.”.
10. Indian Muslim loyalty is first to Mecca and Indian Christian first loyalty is
to Rome. This is true. We all are experiencing it.
11. The tenets of Islam is that, their religion is superior to other religion and
hence other religion must be destroyed. If one reads Koran, all teaching
indicate that they are against Hindus and they want to have Islam state
in India, that is Dar –a- Islam(Land of Islam)
12. Hindus must understand that, if this country is taken over by Muslim, or
Congress, in a democratic way( majority of votes) this nation will suffer
as under:--
(a) There will be no more democracy.
(b) India will be ruled by Sharyat law. ISIS and Caliphate will rule India.
Hindus will be slaves again.
(c) Hindu/Hindu culture will be destroyed (as happened in Pakistan and
Bangladesh) and Hindus will be treated as they were treated in
History, by Muslims and Christians..
(d) All Hindu women(YOUR MOTHER,WIFE,SISTER and DAUGHTER)
will be treated as sex slaves.
(e) There will be no Human Right activities as HR activities will be
eliminated
(g) The so called “intellectuals, think tanks, reformers, liberals,
communists, and secularists” will Not exist, as they will be
eliminated. No one will exist to conduct “Award vapasi.”All will be
silenced.
(h) Judiciary will be committed to Islamic law.
(i) Prevention of communal and Targeted violence bill(PCTV Bill),
which was most dangerous bill for Hindus, will be introduced on

15 | P a g e
priority. Then Hindus will be really slaves. (Read the appx on this
bill.)
13. Do Hindus want this to happen?
14. Grand plans were/are already on drawing board to convert this nation
into Islam by Nehru and Gandhi family (who were Muslim and now half
Muslim and half Christian—which is more dangerous). They are
supported by, Indian Muslim leaders/politicians, pro Muslim, political
parties, and personalities sympathetic to Muslim and Christian, with
foreign connection and financial and moral support from them. Certain
political parties like, Congress, TMC, and Communist, have already
started condemning and defaming Indian Defenses forces. These
parties are aware that only this institution will be standing against their
design.
--------------------------------------------xxx-------------------------------------------

16 | P a g e
WHAT IS GOING WRONG WITH HINDUS?
1. Hindus were always afraid of Muslim minorities for no reason. It was
collective psychological effect and Hindus used to appease them for
vote banks. This Muslim vote bank was important as Hindus were
divided based on cast and regionalism. Pakistan, Bangladesh China,
Nepal, and Myanmar have a grand strategy to strangulate India without
waging an open war. India is aware of it but has no prospective plan.
Indians are only making noise and carrying on with the dull life, as seen
after terrorists’ bomb blasts, throughout the country.
2. All government attitudes irrespective of which party is in power is to
retain power and, for which, even “selling their mothers, sisters, wives
daughters, is acceptable. Hindu men are impotent and their aim is to
amass wealth. Hindus have no sense of nationalism and have no
character.
3. There was too much tolerance by the Hindus. Vasudev Kutumbakam,(
the world is one family) is Hindus motto, and they allowed Bangladeshis
en mass to come and settle in India. They are used as vote bank, in
spite of its repercussion on national security and National interest
.Tolerance without any discrimination lead to confusion. Ahimsa without
any military might is counter productive. Mahatma’s ahimsa was
practiced to such an extent, during partition, that when Hindu women
were raped, the blood of Hindus did not boil but they (Hindu men)
pleaded that Hindu women should be treated with respect. More Hindu
women were raped. Hindus were driven out of Pakistan and
Bangladesh. Hindus were mute witness.. Hindus gave special privileges
to minority but none to majority. Hindus banned anything, which
offended Muslims, but did not ban anything, which offended Hindus.
Hindus make fun of their own culture and Gods and glorify other
religions. Hindus are worried about not offending Muslims and thereby
controlled by Muslims. Hindus are more mindful of offending sentiments
of Muslims than are of Hindu or Sikh. If Hindus go outside with tikka on
the forehead, they are criticized, by Hindus, as fundamentalist, but when
Muslims are out with their skull cap they are appreciated. Hindus
celebrate id and Hindu politicians celebrate ifthar parties but Muslims
refuse to celebrate any festivals of Hindus,

17 | P a g e
4. Majority of Indian TV channels and print media are controlled by Muslim
and Christian countries. These countries, especially, Muslim countries,
are controlling what news is to be fed to Hindus. They have the money
power. They have purchased prominent media personalities and
politicians for “psychological warfare “that anything Hindus do and think
is wrong, including Hindu Gods.
5. No one sympathized with Kar sevaks burnt at Godhra. India is a “ weak
soft state”.The people generally do not have national interest in mind
and have no future perspective plan for the safety of the nation, Indians
have no vision .Imagine, politicians and so called intellectuals, have a
strange opinion that a strong and stable Pakistan is in India’s interest.
When opportunities were available, India did not finish off Pakistan. India
did not learn the attitude of Pakistan in spite of experiences. Indian
political leaders only react to a situation and do not take any proactive
action.
6. Hindus are not proud of Hindu religion and issues connected with
Hinduism. The pseudo –secularist are not supporting Hindus, whereas
every country in the world is proud of its own religion. Hindus are too
apologetic, submissive about their religion and tend to protect any
person/community/ religion, who, give kick to Hindu religion or make fun
of Hindu religion. This attitude, is helping Muslim activities to their
benefit and cause. Unfortunately majority of Hindus has neither read nor
understood Muslim religion.
7. Hindus do not teach their children about their forefathers, scriptures,
Vedas etc. All countries teach their religion to their children. But Hindus
do not. Indians fail to understand that, power respects power, meek
remains weak and is kicked around. India is a secular country because
Hindus are in majority but Hindus do not assert their majority by uniting.
The Hindu policy should have been “tooth for tooth and eye for eye”, as
far as Pakistan and Bangladesh were concerned. Hindus have never
geared up to save the Nation, Hindu religion and culture.
8. Hindus are too casual people, indifferent and with “Sab Chalta Hai”
attitude. Indian cities were bombed 100 times,and India absorbed each
recurrent blow, quivered and did nothing but pronounced to the world
“India is vibrant”.

18 | P a g e
9. The young Hindu generation has no interest in nationalism, religion or
culture. Elder people are tired to do anything. Middle class people are
trying to get into rich category and rich into super rich. Villagers are
trying to survive and exist. Intellectuals are trying to get Padma Bhushan
(if not Noble peace award) awards. Politicians are different breed, of
which less said is better. Muslims and other countries have evil eye on
India and we keep on, just singing the song “Ai Mere vatan ke logo jara
Aakhome bhar lo Pani”.
10. The leaders are impotent corrupts, old and foreigners whose loyalties
are to their religion/county of birth.
11. The famous religious temples trust are controlled by Muslims and
Christian to which Hindus have no objections. The history taught in
schools is glorifying Muslim and foreign rulers. .No nationalism is
encouraged. People are materialistic. There is no respect for the
security forces and this may lead to indifference within security forces..
11. Study of Hindu scriptures and, adherence to Hindu culture is
discouraged. Even song “Vande Mataram” is not practiced, as it is
thought, that it is hurting the sentiments of Muslims.
12. Not knowing teaching of Islam and therefore wrongly understanding
Islam as religion of Bhaichara (Brotherhood). Not understanding the
meaning of Dar-al-Harb “and “Dar-al“, Jihad, Ulma, Islam etc, and how it
was used against Hindus by all Muslims irrespective of their position and
standing in the society. Ignoring the history and experiences and
lessons learned from , how Hindus were badly treated and massacred
by the foreign rulers. There is no uniform civil code applicable.
13. Lack of self discipline. The attitude and understanding, that,“If I and my
family are safe let, anything happen to others and the country, let
anyone rule the country, how does it matter to me.”.
------------------------------------xxxx---------------------------------------------.
WHY HINDUS LOST TO INVADERS
1. Repetitive defeats and consequential enslavement of Hindus of the
Indian sub-continent by Islamic invaders is a long and dreadful narrative.
The ferocious attacks by invaders and the losing wars fought by the

19 | P a g e
Hindus Rajas for nine centuries make it a disheartening tale of
ignominy.
2. Starting with the invasion of Sind by Muhammad bin Qasim in 712 A.D.
the next nine hundred years witnessed a relentless onslaught by hordes
of invaders pouring in through Khyber and Bolan passes. Among the
barbaric murderers and freebooters were Mahmud Ghazanvi,
Muhammad Ghauri, Babur, Ahmad Shah Abdali and Nadir Shah, etcl.
Why Hindus failed to defeat the beastly predators has remained a
troubling chapter of Indian history which needs a bold, no-holds-barred,
discussion.
3. The most important key to repetitive victory of alien invaders was their
use of savagery as a powerful ‘force multiplier’. Hindu rulers failed to
realize that the doctrine of jihad was based on the use of gross savagery
for killing the kaffirs(Hindus) and plundering their hearths and homes.
4. In Babur Vani Guru Nanak has given a vivid description of the
atrocities committed by Babur on the hapless Hindus of Punjab and
north-western India.
5. There was an utter lack of strategic vision and a pathetic obsession
with petty fights with each other. The Hindu Rajas remained divided.
While invaders were busy savaging northern part of the sub-continent,
the Hindu Rajas, and the Hindu masses doped by the Buddhist cult of
‘ahimsa’, or non-violence, remained indifferent to the disaster likely to
overwhelm and ruin them.
----------------------------------------------------xxx------------------------
All religions are not same.
1. PLEASE HINDUS, DON’T SAY“ALL RELIGIONS ARE THE SAME”
2. Please teach this to our children. Our children hear a lot about
Christianity and Islam and how good these religions are. We don’t want
to offend anyone, so we teach very little about Hinduism and what we
teach is only about superficial things, like festivals and customs and not
about the deep philosophy and scientific insights which would portray
Hinduism in a good light and might irritate other religions.”
3. Hindus must ensure that Christianity and Islam respect Hinduism.
4. Hindus also say, “all religions teach the human being to be virtuous and
good and lead him to God”. Christianity and Islam do not say this.

20 | P a g e
5. Hindus attend Inter faith dialogues and try to find the commonalities.
Christianity and Islam do not do this.
6. Christianity and Islam have left a trail of bloodshed in history. But Hindus
choose to ignore it. ‘Why provoke unnecessarily? They might feel.” Thus
still having a psyche, wounded by thousand years of oppression.
----------------------------------------------------xxx------------------------------------
FIFTH COLOMUNIST
Some highly derogatory utterances made by Akbaruddin Owaisi against the
country and Hindus during a provocative public speech on December 24,
2012, are enumerated below.
i) Owaisi claimed that the Muslims had ruled over Hindustan for 1000
years and left our landmark symbols. Taj Mahal, Red Fort, Agra Fort,
Qutub Minar, Charminar, Golkonda and hundreds of other symbols. The
world comes to Hindustan to see our symbols.No one comes to see the
temples of Ram or Krishna.
ii) Muslims of India are the progeny of the invaders and conquerors. When
Muslims ruled over India, they were not even one crore. Now we
Muslims happen to be 25 crores. Not long ago every Pandit and Pujari
used to salute us. The four minars of Charminar show that the East-
West-North-South were dominated by us, i.e., by Muslims.
iii) He reasoned that terror attacks which were happening were wrong. But
Oh Hindustan if Hindus had not allowed destruction of Babri Masjid, then
the bomb blasts at Mumbai would also not have happened. Every action
has a reaction. We will think about secularism only after Babri masjid is
rebuilt. “
iv) Owaisi condemned the hanging of Ajmal Kasab and questioned his
hanging, especially when in Gujarat no criminal case was filed against
the the person who killed 2000 Muslims. He further argued, that if there
was any law in this country, then the way you hanged Kasab, you must
hang Modi, too. This Muslims of Andhra give a call that if all Muslims
unite then Modi will also be hanged.”
v) Heaping scorn on Hindus Owaisi proclaimed that this country belonged
to Muslims and will remain a property of Muslims. Victors like Babar,
Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb had ruled over India and that today’s
Muslims of India were their followers). And if Muslims were made to go
away from India they we will take Taj, Qutub Minar and Red Fort with

21 | P a g e
them. Only dilapated Ram Mandir of Ayodhya and the nude paintings of
Ajanta-Ellora will remain behind. When a Muslim dies, he is are buried
because of his love for the land. When Hindus die, they are cremated
so as to be mix with the nature like vagabonds.
vi) He ranted that there are many Modis who have come and gone. Let
Modi, come to Hyderabad once and we will show you. Tasleema
Nasreen came Hyderabad once. But she was made to run away. The
same will happen to Modi.
vii) Giving a call to Muslims to kill Hindus he raved and ranted saying ‘O
Hindustan we are 25 crores, you are 100 crores. Remove the police for
15 minutes and we will show you who has more courage and
strength. (Crowd rises up in standing ovation) Why are you afraid?
When something happens (meaning riots), I get phone calls. Nobody
calls and tells me- “This happened and I did this and now you take care”.
Take action – don’t fear. Today, I have this mike in front of me. If
tomorrow I hold something else, then there will be so much of bloodshed
in this country which this country has not seen in the last 1000 years.”
viii) He said that in Ayodhya , there are three mandirs where people claim
that Ram was born here. In Haryana, Kaushalyapuram there are places
where people say Ram was born here. Oh Vajpayee, Oh Advani, tell us
where all did Ram’s mother go. They say Ram was born 15 Lakhs years
ago. How do they know what happened so many lakhs of years when
we are unable to track even 200 years of history ?”
ix) He shouted that “there are many pujas that they ( Hindus) do. Rama,
Lakshman, Durga, and how many more?. I knew Lakshmi but who is
Bhagyalakshmi? What sort of names are these? I dont want to spoil the
atmopshere of this pious program by taking this manhoos (ill-fated)
names – (e.g. the names of Hindu gods and goddesses) ”
Needless to mention that Akbaruddin Owaisi and all his twenty five
thousand admirers are traitors and fifth columnists of the first order who
will do anything at the bidding of the ISI to wreck and ruin this country.
Yet another example of the unabashed fury of the fifth columnists planted
by the ISI in India was seen on August 10, 2012, at Mumbai, when a mob
of thirty thousand jihadis gathered in response to a call for demonstration at
Azad Maidan by the notorious fundamentalists of the Raza Academy.
Thousands of Muslim mobsters demonstrating in Azad Maidan to protest
against the so-called persecution of Muslims in Myanamar and Assam. The

22 | P a g e
demonstration, comprising nearly thirty thousand mobsters, was organized
by a Mumbai-based radical outfit known as the Raza Academy. The
rowdies tried to molest and misbehave with a posse of police personnel
detailed on duty to control the demonstrators.
Some Pakistan analysts claime that if the ISI could only manage to
brainwash just one percent of the Muslims of India to rise in rebellion and
take up arms, the estimated 1.5 million strong retinue of indoctrinated local
Muslims will be able to destabilize India and destroy its Hindu identity. The
ISI has been working overtime to pull a plug on the Hindu civilization by
organizing an extensive network of spies, fifth columnists , and
indoctrinating a vast retinue of Indian politicians, including some purblind
intellectuals, knowingly or unknowingly functioning as factotums of the ISI.
The ultimate goal of ISI, SIMI, Indian Mujahideen and innumerable fellow-
travellers of jihadis is in trying to pull the plug on Indian democracy and
undermining the mechanism of governance. Their well-planned mission is
to raise within India an Islamic army of 15 to 20 lakh active fifth columnists
and insurgents to debilitate and destroy India.
----------------------------------------xxx----------------------------------------
History of AIMIM Party
The party has roots back to the days of the princely State of Hyderabad. It
was founded and shaped by Nawab Mahmood Nawaz Khan Qiledar of
Hyderabad State with the "advice" of Nawab Mir Osman Ali Khan, the Nizam
of Hyderabad and in the presence of Ulma-e-Mashaeqeen in 1927 as a pro-
Nizam party.
Then it was only Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM) and the first meeting
was held in the house of Nawab Mahmood Nawaz Khan on November 12,
1927. The MIM advocated the set up of a "Muslim dominion" rather than
integration with India. In 1938, Bahadur Yar Jung was elected "president" of
the MIM which had a "cultural" and religious manifesto. It soon acquired
political complexionand, alongside the Muslim League, were collaborators of
British-occupied India forces. After the death of Bahadur Yar Jang in 1944,
Kasim Rizvi was elected as the leader.
The Razakars, led by Kasim Razvi, were a violent, anti-Hindu Islamist
paramilitary organizationof self-styled "volunteers" formed,ostensibly,
to "resist merger" with India. The Razakars operated as "storm troopers"
for the MIM. The 150,000 Razakar "soldiers", supposedly "mobilized" to

23 | P a g e
"fight against the Indian Union" for the "independence" of Hyderabad State,
were in reality responsible for large-scale action against the state's Hindu
majority of unarmed and desperately poor peasants. After the Indian
annexation of Hyderabad State, the MIM was banned in 1948. Qasim
Rizvi was jailed from 1948 to 1957, and was released on the condition
that he would go to Pakistan where he was granted an asylum.
Before leaving, Kasim Rizvi handed over the responsibility of whatever
remained of the Ittehadul Muslimeen, to Abdul Wahid Owaisi, a lawyer
(Grandfather of Asudin Owaisi, MP from Hydrabad). Abdul Wahed Owaisi
restructured the Party and organized it into All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul
Muslimeen.(AIMIM) .After Abdul Wahed Owaisi, his son Sultan Salahuddin
Owaisi( Father of Asudin Owaisi) took control of AIMIM in 1975 and was
referred to as Salar E Millat (commander of the community). Asudin Owaisi
is the president of AIMIM.(Please note that to the original party name of MIM
only. All India is added)
----------------------------------------------xxx------------------------------------------------
MUSLIM “BHAICHARA”
Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, former President of India, during his term as a
Congress Minister in Assam, had reportedly played a pioneering role in
getting thousands of Muslims from erstwhile East Pakistan (now
Bangladesh) to settle in Assam. The barrister who represented Babri Masjid
Action Committee and former Congress Chief Minster of West Bengal, Mr
Siddhartha Shankar Ray, had reportedly helped thousands of Bihari Muslims
from Bangladesh, who had collaborated with the Pakistanis in the 1971 war
for Bangladeshi liberation, to settle in West Bengal. So, did Ghani Khan
Chowdhury in Malda, and many others.
MoinulHuq Choudhury, (the Private Secretary of Jinnah and also a
prominent leader of the youth wing ofAIML, till partition, joined Congress
party along with the supporters of Pakistan en-mass. who later became a
Minister in the Union Cabinet of Indira Gandhi Government and former
President of India Fakharuddin Ali Ahmad were widely known for being
instrumental in the settlement of illegal Muslim immigrants. On the eve of
partition, he was shaky whether to opt for Pakistan or stay back in India .He
was however told by Jinnah, "wait for ten years, I shall present Assam
on a silver plate to you" (Politics of Alienation in Assam by Bhawani Singh,
1984, Page 72). Jinnah died in1948 but the Congress Party fulfilled his
promise by inducting Chaudhary in the Cabinet of Congress Government led
by Gopi Nath Bordoloi. It is often alleged that Chaudhary stayed back in

24 | P a g e
Assam on the advice of Jinnah and other Pakistani leaders to help the
immigrantsfrom Pakistan for their settlement in Assam.” What we see in
Assam today appears to be a fulfilment of Jinnah's promise. The events that
followed also indicated that Maniul Haq Choudhary did stay back in India as
a part of strategy to separate Assam.
Mr Mohammad Hamid Ansari, ex Vice President of India, just before his end
of the tenure said that Muslims are not safe in India. We are also aware, his
refusal to salute National flag as it was against his religion.
Recently he took part in a function organized by Popular Front of India (PFI)
at Kozhikode, in Kerala. PFI is linked with SIMI as per the established facts,
reports from Kerala police report. PFI also organizes converting Hindus to
Muslim and is a fanatic Muslim organization.
These incidents show that “Bhaichara” is only amongst Muslims.
---------------------------------------------------xxx---------------------------------------------
Anti-Hinduism is an industry
1. Certain section of the Hindus and Pro Muslim parties, found/find it
profitable to abuse Hindu culture and society.
2. This narrative morphed into an industry after Independence. Gandhi’s
assassination gave Nehru an excuse to stifle all opposition, particularly
the nationalists. Under Indira Gandhi and Education Minister Nural
Hasan, anti-Hinduism became firmly entrenched in academia and
media. Its steady growth and dominance in the electronic and print
media became unchallengeable.
3. UPA-2 was more confident. There was a determinedand coordinated
attack on Hindu culture and society as a whole. Textbooks were
changed. Nationalist bloggers were jailed. New Bills were introduced or
changes were made to the existing ones, to the detriment of the majority
community. Many new magazines, newspapers and online media
outlets, which had a clearly anti-Hindu bent, were floated. Their hold on
institutions strengthened. They were gearing for a final push to silence
the nationalist opposition once and for all.New magazines and media
houses were opened to further the goal of anti-Hinduism. These were
more rabidly anti-Hindu than anything India had ever seen before.
Their views bordered on racism aimed at entire Hindu society and
culture, reminiscent of the colonial era.

25 | P a g e
--------------------------------------------------xxx-----------------------
Unholy Alliance of Radical Islam and the Global Left
1. In India the Lefthad always beenaligned with Islamism in a bid to divide
the majority by uniting and supporting the minorities.Duringthe reign of
UPA-2, this alliance became more radical than any time before.
2.. The Left began a determined and sustained effort to attack Hindu
society and became open supporters for Islamic crimes of the past and
present through various media houses and online sites.In these
websites, every aspect of Hindu civilization was derided; every national
hero was slandered and every villain glorified.
3.. Left-liberalism and anti-Hinduism became mainstream, since Indira
Gandhi’s tryst with the communists. Almost every major newspaper
sports some anti-Hindu propaganda almost on a daily basis.However,
after the 2014 General Elections, while most of the mainstream media
has become cautious, there are many magazines and websites which
are solely devoted to churning out anti-Hindu material some of which
borders on propaganda.
-------------------------------------------------------xxx------------------------------------------
WRONG perception of the Hindus.(Only few have been listed)
1. The majority of Hindus, still think that present Gandhi family are
decedents of (Mahatma!!)M K Gandhi and therefore (like M K
Gandhi)they can do no wrong
2. We, Hindus, still consider that MK Gandhi was equivalent to God and is
Mahatma
3. Pundit Nehru, was real Pundit, therefore highly learned Hindu. Being
“Pundit” he could do no wrong. He is still considered as “Chacha”, a very
affectionate and respected word, which shows relationship amongst
Hindu family members, among Hindus, whereas Hindus are NOT aware
that the Nehru family is Muslim, Nehru himself was manipulater.
4. Present history, written by Muslims, Congress and Communist is
authentic.
-------------------------------------------------------------xxx------------------------------------
Demographic Threat Facing Indian Civilization

26 | P a g e
Unfortunately a majority of middle class Hindu elite and opinion-makers do
not understand the weird phenomenon of demographic decimation which
destroyed the secular and multicultural ethos solely due to fast growth of
Muslims.
To understand the long term implications of fast-paced demographic
changes, it is necessary to consider the following facts, gleaned from the
data of last six censuses held in India since 1951:
1. Since independence in percentage terms there has been a relentless
increase in the population of only one community, i.e., the Muslims,
2. Census 2001 disclosed that the decadal growth rate of Muslims was
around 36 percent, while the Hindu growth rate had declined from 23
percent to 20 percent. It led to an unseemly political controversy on the
ground that no census had taken place in J. & K. state in 1991. It led to
a very clumsy fudging of census 2001, by omitting from the census 3.67
crore people living in Jammu & Kashmir and Assam, the 2 states having
high Muslim population.
3. The fertility of Muslims, which was about 10 per cent higher than that of
Hindus before independence, is now 25 to 30 per cent higher than the
Hindu rate.
4. The acceptance of family planning by Muslims is lower at least by 25
percentthan Hindus and other communities. The real reason is 'religion'.
5. The fact that in non-Muslim countries there is a general trend towards
higher growth rate of Muslim populations.
6. In 50 years time Europe is likely to become a Muslim majority continent.
And this warning has alerted most countries of the continent. Some
enterprising futurologists have re-named Europe as ‘EURABIA’. And
that appears to be coming true even in India where the Hindu birth rate
is fast approaching the European average.
It is time that the Indian middle class and opinion makers understood the
long term consequences of the existential demographic crisis writ large
across the Indian horizon.
. The foregoing cold facts should ring a loud alarm bell to wake up all
those who want to ensure long term survival of secularism in India. The
problem has global dimensions, too. It is unfortunate that while the world
has woken up to the threat of rapidly changing demography, we
Indians have remained unconcerned.

27 | P a g e
--------------------------------------------------xx-------------------------------------------------
M US L IM “ NO G O ” ZO NE S
The global experience is that the growth of jihadi militancy in any State or
area, is invariably preceded by certain tell-tale marks the most
importantamong which is the growth of pockets of “No-Go” areas. The
experience of police forces tells us that these pockets gradually develop into
extensive ‘No-Go’ Zones where the entry of police is resisted by rowdy
gangs of criminals and anti-national goons. This important development in
any country, city or town signifies the growth of lawlessness to subvert
governance which must be dealt with effectively by the police.
Over a period of time, a number of ‘No-Go’ zones were created in West
Bengalby the illegal infiltrators from Bangladesh duly aided by hundreds
of ISI-embedded spy-modules nurtured by the radical outfits operating
from Bangladesh like Jamaat- e- Islami Bangladesh , Chhatra Shibir,
Jamat-ul- Mujahideen Bangladesh, etc. There is no denying the fact that
the complexities created by the partisan politics of West Bengal have added
grist to the mill of the jihadi explosion in that State. But the fact remains
that there has been a massive increase in ‘no-go’ areas across West Bengal
due to the collapse of police patrolling—mostly due to political interference.
There are hundreds of villages where the writ of the State government does
not run and the police are unable to enter due to fear of violent resistance
by anti-national groups aided by political dadas.
Islamic extremists were stepping up the creation of “no-go” areas in several
cities that are off-limits to non-Muslims and law enforcement
officers. Many “no-go”zones are functioning as microstates governed
by Sharia.The governmentshave lostcontrolin ‘no-go’zones.The “no-
go” areas are the logical consequences of the growth of Islamic ghettos
and the inability of police to patrol those areas due to the organized
resistance offered by mobsters.Muslims have been allegedly accused of
“ethnic cleansing” the locality by harassing non-Muslims to the point that
many of them move out of Muslim-dominated neighborhoods.
--------------------------------------------------xxx----------------------------------------
Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence Bill (PCTV Bill)
Sonia Khans Efforts to put Final Nail in the Hindus’ Coffin

28 | P a g e
The draft bill is biased and against Majority ie Hindus. Many educated
people are not aware of this bill( Are you one of them?) The UPA II was very
keen to pass this bill during this winter session 2013.
Comments on Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence Bill
(PCTV)(written in the present tense) ( IF THIS BILL IS PASSED HINDUS
WILL BE TREATED AS CRIMINALS WORLD WIDE) KEY POINTS
1. A Hindu against whom any Muslim/Christian/ minority, make any
complaint, shall be presumed by law to be guilty by Police & Courts till
that Hindu proves his innocence (Sec70, 71& 73)
2. An accused Hindu shall have to be immediately arrested, as all
offences under this bill, are non-bail able & cognizable (Sec 56)
3. This law can be invoked only by a minority against Hindus.
4. Accused Hindu shall not be informed who has complained against him
(Sec 38) but police has to inform complainant progress of the case.
5. A minority is not required to give any evidence to support his
complaints against Hindus (Sec 70, 71 & 72)
6. A Hindu refusing to do business with any minority ,shall be immediately
arrested [Sec 3 (f) (i)]. Taking advantage of such anti – Hindu laws a
minority can force a Hindu to sell /rent his property and even surrender
his daughters to minorities.
7. A minority cannot be punished for making even false complaints/
statement against Hindus (Sec 40)
8. The PCTV Bill (56 pages) is based on presumption that all Hindus are
criminals and communal riots are always committed only by Hindus and
never by minorities. This law can be invoked only against Hindus by
minorities. Muslims, Christians called “the Group” in the bill (sec 3.e). If
they commit violence and hate against Hindus they cannot be booked
under this new law, as they are exempt from it.
9. Under the PCTV Bill, a Hindu against whom a Muslim including a
Bangaladeshi Muslim infiltrator, a jehadi terrorist Muslim or a Christian
or any minority makes a complaint, the Hindu shall be presumed ab
initio, to be guilty of crimes; that Hindu shall have to be arrested as all
crimes under this Bill are cognizable and non-bail able [Clause 56 of
may 2011 version]; that Hindu shall have to prove his innocence before
a Court; that the Muslim or Christian making complaint is not required to
give any proof or evidence to support charge against that Hindu; that

29 | P a g e
Hindu shall not be informed as to who has made complaint against him
[Section 38]. During the pendency of the case the court can attach
property of the accused Hindu even before he is found guilty [Sec 80,
81]. After this bill is passed any donation for religious charity made by a
Hindu industrialist will invite great penalty and legal action against him.
10. If a minority woman complains of rape against a Hindu, he shall be
arrested and he shall have to prove that charge against him is false and
that Hindu will not know which woman has made complaint. But if a
Hindu woman is raped by a minority male then she has to prove charge
of rape against that Muslim etc and her identity shall be told to her
rapist. (Ind. Exp. 12.1.12)
11. Taking advantage of this bill a religious minority can force a Hindu to sell
his property to him or rent his property to him; can force a Hindu to write
off debts a minority owes to him. If a Hindu landlord evicts his Muslim
tenant ,then he can be sent to jail by a false complaint of that tenant. If a
Hindu factory owner suspends a Muslim employee for bad work he can
be sent to jail by a false complaint of that employee in which no proof
required. If a Muslim applies for a job, the Hindu industrialist cannot
refuse him. A minority can blackmail a Hindu industrialist and collectlacs
of rupees from him. This bill will encourage Terrorist elements and pave
the ground for Civil War in India. This is Anti-national, Anti-secular, Anti-
Harmony, Anti- Democracy, Anti-Constitution, Anti-People and Anti
Business.This bill is a violation of human rights of 95 crore Hindu hence
we should appeal to the United Nations. Yet Mulayam Singh is
supporting this will.
12. This Bill if enacted as a law shall give a legal weapon to every minority
to send to jail for 10 years or more any Hindu. (Indian Express 12/1/12)
The question arises why there is so much hatred against peace loving
innocent Hindus. All this is because there is Muslim unity (Muslim Vote
Bank) but No Hindu unity (Hindu Vote Bank).
13. Congress wanted to pass this bill because this bill will create permanent
hatred between majority and minorities.
14. Many minority institutions including Jemait-e-Ulema Hind are forcing
congress for passing this bill. Hence congress will pass this bill saliently
to win 2014 election with Muslim votes. Gulam Navi Azad said that govt.
is committed to pass this bill.
-------------------------------------------xxx----------------------------------------------

30 | P a g e
Psyche of Modern Hindu Indians
1. A defeatist tendency exists in the psyche of modern Indians perhaps
unparalleled in any other country today. The main effort of its cultural
leaders appears to be to pull the country down or remake it in a foreign
image, as if little Indian and certainly nothing Hindu was worthy of
preserving or even reforming.
2. The elite of India suffer from a fundamental alienation from the
traditions and culture of the land that would not be less poignant had
they been born and raised in a hostile country. The ruling elite appears
to be little more than a native incarnation of the old colonial rulers who
haughtily lived in their separate cantonments, neither mingling with the
people nor seeking to understand their customs. This new English-
speaking aristocracy prides itself in being disconnected from the very
soil and people that gave it birth.
3. It has becomea national pastime among its educated class to denigrate
its own culture and history, however great that has been over the many
millennia of its existence.
4. The majority religion and its institutions are taxed and regulated while
minority religions receive tax benefits and have no regulation or even
monitoring. While the majority religion is carefully monitored and limited
as to what it can teach, minority religions can teach what they want,
even if anti-national or backward in nature. Books are banned that
offend minority religious sentiments but praised if they cast insults on
majority beliefs.
5. Caste and family loyalties are more important than the national interest,
even among those who claim to be democratic, socialist or caste
reformers. Political parties exist not to promote a national agenda but to
sustain one region or group of people in the country at the expense of
the whole
6. In the guise of removing caste, a new castism has arisen where one’s
caste is more important than one’s qualifications either in gaining
entrance into a school or in finding a job when one graduates. Anti-
Brahminism has often become the most virulent form of castist
thinking. People view the government not as their own creation but as a
welfare state from whom should take the maximum personal benefit,
regardless of the consequences for the country as a whole.

31 | P a g e
7. Political parties in India see gaining power as a means of amassing
personal wealth and robbing the nation. deference to the more
numerous corrupt leaders who often have a stranglehold on the
bureaucracy.
8. Politicians divide the country into warring vote banks and place one
community against another.
9. To further their ambitions, Indian politicians will manipulate the foreign
press to denigrate their opponents, even if it means spreading lies and
rumors and making the country an anathema in the eyes of the outside
world. Petty conflicts in India are blown out of proportion in the foreign
media, not by foreign journalists but by Indians seeking to use the media
to score points against their own opponents in the country. The Indians
who are responsible for the news of India, in the foreign press, spread
venom and distortion about their own country, perhaps better than any
foreigner who dislikes the culture of India..
10. The Congress Party, the oldest in this predominantly Hindu nation, has
given its leadership to an Italian Catholic woman simply because as the
widow of the last Gandhi prime minister.She carries the family torch, as
if family loyalty were still the main basis of political credibility in the
country. And such a leader and a party are deemed progressive!
11. Yet the irony is that rather than embracing its own great traditions, the
modern Indian psyche prefers to slavishly imitate worn out trends in
western intellectual thought like Marxism or even to write apologetics for
Christian and Islamic missionary aggression. Though living in India, in
proximity to temples, yogis and great festivals, most modern Indian
intellectuals are oblivious to the soul of the land. They might as well be
living in England or China for all they know of their own country.
--------------------------------------------------------xx-------------------------------------------
NON VOILANCE
अह िंसा परमो धममः, धममह िंसा तदैव च: l
अर्थात - अह िंसथ मनुष्य कथ परम धमा ै और धमा की रक्षथ के लिए ह िंसथ करनथ
उस से भी श्रेष्ठ ै.
1."Ahimsa Paramo Dharma" is Sanskrit phrase that was popularized by
Mahatma Gandhi and is often repeated by many Indian leaders to
demonstrate the universality of Ahimsa. Looselytranslated,”,Ahimsa Paramo

32 | P a g e
Dharma” means that non-violence is the topmost duty to the extent that it
supersedes all other duties. For someone who holds this true, it means that
there is no selective application of ahimsa,it must be applied in every case
and in all matters. This universal sense leads to an unconditional and
unilateral abandonment of violent resistance, under any and all
circumstances (as in the philosophy of Buddhists and Jains, and teaching by
M K Gandhi).
. 2. Gandhi made ahimsa (non-violence) the cornerstone of his philosophy
and practice and spoke of it as constituting the essence of Hinduism. We
Hindus, always miss the second sentence that is धममह िंसा तदैव च: l(To protect
Dharma violence is more important)
3. While Gandhi championed the ethic of ahimsa, there are ancient traditions
within Hinduism which sanction violence under certain circumstances and
that ahimsa and himsa (violence) have coexisted in Hinduism for centuries.
Therefore,Gandhi’s representation of Hinduism must be questioned,and are
being questioned.
4. Vedic society in ancient India did not scrupulously adhere to ahimsa as its
highest value. Two of the most popular epics in the Hindu tradition, the
Ramayana and the Mahabharata culminate in lengthy and violent battles.
The Mahabharata war is referred to, in the Bhagavad-Gita, as a dharma
yuddha. A dharma yuddha is a war fought in defence of justice and
righteousness and for the security and well being of Nation. The final
characteristic ofa dharma yuddha is, that violence is justified as a last
resort and only after peaceful methods of conflict resolution are
exhausted. It is clear, therefore, that there are influential traditions
within Hinduism which justify the use of violence under certain
circumstances.
5. “Ahimsa paramodharma" is not mentioned in the Bhagavad Gita as
is frequently cited. The Gita begins with Arjuna telling Krishna that he is
despondent and unwilling to fight the war. In this discussion, Lord Krishna
repeatedly tells Arjuna get up and fight. One such statement is: “If, however,
you do not fight this religious war, then you will certainly incur sins for
neglecting your duties and thus lose your reputation as a fighter.”
6. Had the Lord Krishna, said 'Ahimsa paramo dharma' then the war
would have ended before it began because he would have effectively

33 | P a g e
been stating that there is no need to fight because the greater dharma
is non-violence.
7."Ahimsa Paramo Dharma" cannot be strictly practiced by
householders. If someone enters the house and molests a lady, a
householdercannotkeep quiet. But M K Gandhi taught us differently.
Also in one of his writing he advised women not to resist the rapist and
suffer the rape willingly!! Similarly, in a war, a soldier cannot put down his
weapons.( Our judiciary, dictating us how to fight and which weapons to be
used against terrorists!!). In either case, practicing ahimsa would be
adharma, not dharma. Similarly, a king must protect his subjects even if it
requires violence to punish criminals or going to war with neighboring nation.
Lord Krishna. Clearly states that ahimsa, while highly regarded, is not the
highest dharma for everyone and certainly not for Arjuna on the
battlefield of Kurukshetra.
8. The question also arises why Hindu Gods have all types of weapons in
their hands?
9. In the early days of the mankind, men had weapons to take the power
over the animals they were hunting. So weapons gave them Power. To
Protect the Powerless they have to be "Powered". When Hindus, wanted
their God, and Goddess, to be more powerful than them, and protect them,
they equipped God, and Goddess with the weapons.
10 Next time if someone tells you “अह िंसथ परमो धमाः”( अह िंसा मनुष्य का
परम धमम ै ), your immediate answer must be, “धमाह िंसथ तदैव च: “ धमा की रक्षथ के
लिए ह िंसथ करनथ उस से भी श्रेष्ठ ै.
11. Let’s teach our children and grand children about” धमाह िंसथ
तदैव च: l”
------------------------------------------------xxx----------------------------

34 | P a g e
WE, THE FOOLISH AND DULL HINDUS OF INDIA
One of the British’s most senior military strategists has warned, (Times of
India, Mumbai edition13 Jun 2006) that the world faces three threats, in par
with barbarian invasion that destroyed some civilizations of the world in the
past. In an apocalyptic vision of security dangers, Rear Admiral Chris Parry,
said that the first threat will be of future migration, which he called, an
invasion. The immigrant communities with little allegiance to their host
country will have effectof,a “reverse colonization”. The second threat will be
environmental destruction and population explosion. The third is radical
Islam. Parry’s analysis is based on forecasts and statistics drawn up by
international organizations. All the three dangers are applicable to India.
Before dwelling on these issues, a quick look about what history tell us, and
where we went wrong.
A nation that has no consciousness of its past has no future. A nation that
does not understand and learn from its history is doomed. History attaches
more importance to the exposition of principles than to mere narrative. A
nation must develop its capacity, not only of claiming a past but also of
knowing how to use it for the furtherance of its future. We must take a
rational view of our history.
Our early civilization shows that we were a giant when other nations,
especially western world, were “pigmies”. Ours was known as the “golden
age” and in our ancient land “milk and honey” used to flow. We have taught
the world about almost all spheres of life--- science, art, warfare,
mathematics, astrology, medicine, proper governanance of state etc. We
were very much proud of our history. But let us also be ashamed of our
history. First, we, as a people, were not united. Right from the
Mahabharata days, there was no unity between brothers, father and son,
amongst clans, kings, relatives and the neighbors. Not only there was no
unity, there were traitors too. The foreign invaders took advantage of our
disunity and treason and ruled over us.
Second, since we had plenty of resources, we never attacked our
neighbors for wealth. Foreigners came and attacked us to plunder our
wealth. The conquering forces came frequently through the mountain passes
from Central Asia. And we, as a nation, absorbed each recurrent blow,
quivered and lay still. We became indifferent to such attacks, to the extent,
that we never stopped our enemy in the enemy’s territory and, that too, near
important cities. We never had an offensive spirit. We always had a “slave”

35 | P a g e
mentality or attitude, we tolerated foreign rulers and our collective psyche
was always to “look up” to the foreign ruler.
Third, By and large, loyalty to one’s own caste or sub-caste was the
primary loyalty-other loyalties- to the country, were secondary. There
was very little social contact betweenthe people of various castes, who lived
in separate residential areas and even had separate wells. Quite a
population was dubbed as untouchables, and they were treated worse than
animals.
Fourth, we were over-tolerant and liberal with our enemies. Even after
defeating and capturing our enemy, we let them go. This was considered as
“generosity and bravery” on our part, but obviously it was the most unwise
thing to do. The same enemy, who was left unharmed, when he conquered
us, made sure that he wiped out the whole state. Example is Prithviraj
Chouhan and Mohammed Ghouri. We had no idea about our national
security and had no concern for its future. We never thought of the future of
our country, people and religion. If Prithviraj Chouhan had the concept of
national- security, concern for the future for his country, the people or
religion, he would not have pardoned Mohammed Ghouri many times.
PrithvirajChouhanwas blinded and killed by Mohammed Ghouri when
Prithviraj Chouhan lost to him
Fifth, we were tolerant in the matter of religion, whereas others were
not. We as a nation and people of this country are still adhering to
above five points
Now let’s talk about Islam and Muslims who ruled us for 1000 years, before
discussing the radical elements of Islam.
India’s end came slowly from “golden era”, she was completely devoured
from the 8th century onwards by Islamic foreign powers. From the 8th
century until the 18th century, the Turks, Afghans, Arabs and Mughals {all
Muslim invaders} came one after another and held on to large parts of India
for 1,000 years. During this Islamic period, Hindu structures were forcefully
destroyed or converted into Mosques and other Islamic structures. To fully
appreciate this, lets see some quotes and judgments from prominent
personalities, who have examined the history of Islam in India.,
Quotes On Muslims In India
” The most heinous crimes which the followers of Mohammad called as
Jihadis or to use a more euphemistic term, Muslims, perpetrated was on

36 | P a g e
peace loving Hindus in India. The entire civilization of Hindus called as
Saraswati Civilization was decapitated and reduced to dust. The depth and
the scope of holocaust, which befell Hindus, is so staggering that common
human mind fails to understand this and goes blank. Vedic India, originally
called as Bharatvarsha, stretched from Afghanistan all the way to Japan.
Murderous Muslims laid siege to glorious Bharatvarsha almost 1400 years
ago and by treacherous and totally subhuman techniques succeeded in
destruction and plunder of the greatest civilization that humanity has
known so far. “
(From Book-- Rape of a Civilization, by Kuldeep Razdan, September 4th, 1999.)
"The Mohammedan conquestof India is probablythe bloodiest story in
history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a
precious thing, whose delicate complex of order and liberty, culture and
peace may at any time be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or
multiplying from within."
(- W. Durant, "Story of Civilization")
“In other parts of Asia and Europe, the conquered nations quickly opted for
conversion to Islam rather than death. But in India, because of the staunch
resistance of the 4000-year-old Hindu faith, the Muslim conquests were for
the Hindus a pure struggle between life and death. Entire cities were burnt
down and their populations massacred. Each successive campaign brought
hundreds of thousands of victims and similar numbers were deported as
slaves. Every new invader often made literally his hill of Hindu skulls. Thus
the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the
annihilation of the entire Hindu population there; indeed, the region is still
called Hindu Kush, 'Hindu slaughter'. The Bahmanisultans in centralIndia
made it a rule to kill 100 thousand Hindus a year. In 1399, Teimur the
lame is said to have killed a 100,000 Hindus IN A SINGLE DAY and that
accordingto his own Muslim historians. Koenraad Elst quotes Professor
K.S. Lal's "Growth of Muslim population in India", who writes that according
to his calculations, the Hindu population decreased by 8O MILLION,
between the year 1000 and 1525. ...We will never be able to assess the
immense physical harm done to India by the Muslim invasions.Even more
difficult is to estimate the moral and the spiritual damage done to
Hindu India.
Islamic invaders did not only destroy countless temples and
constructions but also suppressed cultural and religious practices,

37 | P a g e
damagedthe heartof the Indian religion.The Hindus suffered immense
psychological damage.
PARTITION OF BANGAL
Between the pledges of safety being offered by the Muslim leaders and the
urging of Gandhi, thirteen million non-Muslims-Hindus, Buddhists and
Christians chose to stay in East Pakistan. In 1950, nearly half a million
Hindus were slaughtered in East Pakistan. And the slaughter was
accomplished with horrendous brutality. About 4.5 million East Pakistanis
crossed into India but eventually the "Secular" Indian government
prevented refugees from crossing into its territory to prevent
"communal" violence between the Hindus and the Muslims in India
itself. Eight million Hindus were left behind living in constant fear for
their safety.
In 1971 a civil war was fought and an independent Bangladesh came into
existence. In the process, however, three million Hindus , were massacred
by the Pakistani Muslims who were being urged to kill the kaffir Hindu.As the
Pakistani Major-General Sawkat Reza remarked: "We have undertaken this
noble work in the name of our religion....” .
THE CONCEPT BEHIND MASS KILLING (PLESAE REFER TO PAGES
NUMBER FROM 5 TO 10 UNDER SAME HEADING)
How do we explain these
Local Islamic fundamentalist forces are helping ISI of Pakistan in all
their activities. ISI has their bases, with the help of local antinational
Muslims, in most of the states, especially in UP, Bihar, Assam and
Maharashtra. But we are ignoring them for the sake of vote bank.
A new breed of Islamic political activity—otherwise known as Salafi or
Wahhbi are crude literalists in matter of religious interpretation are thriving.
The myth that Muslims youth are turning to terrorism due to their
economically backwardness is exposed when we find educated youth
as doctors, computer engineers are helping terrorist, after getting
training from Pakistan, and are their sympathizers. Mushrooming of
Madarsas, where essence of Koran is taught, to young Muslim

38 | P a g e
generation is a clear sign of what is going to happen in India, within
next 50 to 100 years.
It is very interesting to see that very few liberal or educated Muslims
stand up against terrorist activities or on the issues of fatwa, for the
simple reason, which we are aware of. They are mute spectators
because for the obvious reasons.
Certain Stunning Facts
Fundamentalist Islam groups all over world openly ask for donation so that
they can come to India and convert Hindus to their religion. They not only
promote or propagate their religion but also attack Hinduism. Hindus not only
not oppose but also tolerate it and are mute witnesses. Some Hindu”
intellectuals” have observed that Naxlites pose more danger to India quoting
that” Naxlites are active in 136 districts out of about 525 district.” But Hindu”
intellectuals” fail to see the motive behind Muslim collective psychic. Naxlites
aims are different. Muslims aims are according to the teaching of Koran.
Islamic fundamentalist poses greatest danger to India
Have we ever given a serious thought why Muslim call themselves
Muslim Indian rather than Indian Muslims. Some Muslim leaders did not
want Pakistan (they were committed nationalist) but they wanted whole of
India for “Islamization”. It was a prominent Muslim leader and a CM of
Assam, who started encouraging Muslims from Bangladesh to come and
settle in India and gave them legal status. Unfortunately this is still
continuing.
This time the aim of Muslims is not another partition but Islamization of whole
India. Jihad encompasses whole of India, Pakistan is trying something like
Creation of Greater Pakistan, which includes complete India. Pakistan does
not see (as its bigger vision) Kashmir as disputed territory but as a war
between Islam and Hindus. This is a real clash of civilization
Muslims are of the view that their Prophetsingled out India (Hindus) as
especial target for jihad. Slowly and studiedly some groups like SIMI are
openly joining this type of campaign. National Develop Front (NDF) and PFI
in Kerala, and its affiliates in southern states, Jamiat Ulma in Assam, Sipah-
e-Sahaba, in Hydrabad Al Jihad and Harkat-ul-Mujahideen in western UP
are some of the active anti national Muslim terrorist organizations are
operating All are Wahabi organization and are supported by ISI. If certain
“enlighten” politicians, political parties and intellectuals of India, protect such

39 | P a g e
organization, for whatsoever reasons.There will be more such organizations,
to fulfill the grand design of Pakistan.
Islam intellectuals always talk that “Islam is all about Aman (Peace),
Bhaichara (Brotherhood) (and we Hindus accept it)–but they have proved it,
otherwise.( Aman and Bhaichara is within Ummah.) They talk highly about
Indian secularism but same people will demolish secularism once they get
some power. As soon as they get 1/10 of the Lok Sabha seats, they will start
dictating their terms and conditions on the majority party. This will last till
they become a party to play power with. We must understand that India is in
between jaws of two Islamic countries (Pakistan and Bangladesh) and they
are trying to smash us
We, Hindus, are ignorant about what is written in Koran and therefore
our opinion is formed by what Muslims tell us. The so called
intellectuals and pseudo – secularisthave leastidea of Muslim religion,
what is written in Koran and Hadiatand above all the bloody history of
Islam. They mustread,read, and re read and study literature on these
issues.
Here is another evidence of our stupid ideas. Government issued a
protective order to protect all mosques from being destroyed in a similar
manner to expose the Hindu temples underneath. Do you think, any Islamic
country in this world will reciprocate, and offer such protection for non-
Islamic places of worship; and this is in spite of the Hindu temple being
buried under the Mosque and many others converted to Mosques in India
according to annals of Hindu documents?
There is a distinct dangerof another Muslim country,speaking Bengali
predominantly, emerging in the Eastern part of East India in near
future. It is not migration but invasion. 20 million Bangladeshis is enough
majorities to control states like W Bengal and Assam. Every 10th resident in
West Bengal and Assam is Bangladeshi. Muslims are already asking a
separate Muslim state in western UP.
Muslims readily betray their motherland for the sake of their Ummah.
Muslims apparently do not have a concept of nationalism but only of the
Ummah. They do not have any allegiance to a motherland or fatherland.
Muslims always claim to be willing to do anything for Islam, but apparently
not much for either humanity or the nation where they may live.
For thirteen centuries the Hindus have withstood, with breaks here and there
and with varying degrees of success,attempts to Islamize the sub-continent.

40 | P a g e
. At the moment, Islamic efforts seem confined to fighting the jihad through
terrorism, and in swelling the Muslim population of the Republic of India by
over a 100 million by infiltration (During 2005 the Indian supreme court
describedthe influx of illegal immigrantsof Bangladeshis as “external
aggression”).
Islam sees India as an "unfinished business" and it has been often
declared as part of Dar-ul-Islam. Oil-rich Muslim countries such as
SaudiArabia are spending millions trying to convert and subvert India
to Islam.
Chanakya in his book “Arthasharsta” prorogated the concept of, “Sama,
Dam, Dand Bhed “. The Pakistan is trying it on us. Very few Indians
(including Defense Services) are aware that “ Arthasharstra “ is compulsory
reading for all military officers, in Pakistan.
Where and how we (Hindus) are going wrong
There is too much tolerance with Hindus. Tolerance without any
discrimination leads to confusion. We are giving special privileges to
minority but none to majority. We ban anything, which offends
Muslims, but do not ban anything, which offends Hindus (for ex-- M F
Hussein’s nude painting of Sita, Hanuman and Bharatmata.) Indian
Muslims getoffended on minor issues, but Muslims of other countries
do not. Hindus make fun of our culture and Gods and glorify other
religions.
We are worried about not offending Muslims and thereby start getting
controlled by them (examples –reservation, demands, changing constitution)
Hindus do not mind shifting their Idols from the temples or demolishing part
of temple walls if the town plan requires widening the roads. However, same
if tried in case of mosques, or their land, then there is huge uproar from the
Muslim community, i.e. Bhivandi is the latest example. We are more mindful
of offending sentiments of Muslims than we are of Hindu, Sikh or Christens.
The article titled “Invisible Border” written by famous intellectual of media; Ms
Barkha Dutt in HT dated 29 Jul 2006 should be an eye opener. It is
worthwhile to quote few sentences from it “1---There is no doubt that,
ultimately war against terror is a war of mind; extremism can only grow roots
in soil that has been under water and undernourished. 2 Our cities are
collapsing into ghettos,with invisible borderdividing our people. 3 ---And the
statistics tell their own sorry story. Less than 4 percent of India’s police force
is Muslim, no more than 2 percent of India’s bureaucracy is Muslim and
Muslim are 5 percentage behind national literacy rate, making them the most

41 | P a g e
educationally backward religious community. Yet if government appointed
committee, attempts to gather data on just how representative our political
and military institution are we accuse it of formatting communalism 4 ---If the
Indian Muslim remains in the margin of development isn’t there a good
chance that he will remain on the periphery in every other way as well.? It’s
this imbalance, the sense of being outsider, a person with no stake in the
system that could provide the perfect breeding ground for terror. So next
time, don’t just stare at the bearded man with the skullcap. Look beyond and
look within (this is obviously meant for Hindus) “. So the majority
community is ,indirectly, blamed for the terrorist acts. What is written,
in this article,” about Indian Hindu intellectual and pseudo –secularist
“, again has been proved.
Hindus are second-class citizens. No one sympathized with Kar sevaks
burnt at Godhra.
We have to teach our children aboutour forefathers, scriptures, Vedas
etc. All Muslim countries teach Koran, and Christens, Bible. Why not, we
teach our religious scriptures to children. USA is a secular country but also a
Christian majority country.
We are failing to understand that, Power respects power, meek remains
weak and is kicked around
We are not proud of Hindu religion and issues connected with it. Every
country in the world, including USA, is proud of its own religion. We
are too apologetic submissive about our Hinduism. The pseudo –
secularistkick any one supportingHindu religion and protectany other
religion giving kick to Hindu religion or make fun of Hindu religion.
This attitude is helping Muslim activities to their benefit and cause.
Unfortunately majority of Hindus have neither reads nor understood Muslim
religion. Ask any educated Hindu what is “Dar-al-Harb “and “Dar-al– Islam “
and they will show their ignorance. Indian Muslim are having two identity, as
part of wider India and second as part of the pan -Islamic community, that
includes other global Muslim societies “(read Muslim countries. The
Pakistanis say “Larke liya Pakistan – Has ke leyange Hindustan.” (We got
Pakistan after fighting, but we will get Hindustan easily) They are proving this
and the “secularists” (present days Jaichands) are assisting in a big way
(reservation for Muslims, extras considerations shown to them on so many
occasions)
Muslim religion do not recognize any international border. Their first loyalty is
to the religion and not to the country, where they were born (Enough

42 | P a g e
examples are available in the world and Indian history. Our experience with
Bangladesh, the nation whom we gave birth, is now our enemy--- based on
their religion)
India is a secular country because Hindus are in majority but we are
not asserting our majority by uniting.
The Hindu policy should be “tooth for tooth and eye for eye” as far as
Pakistan and Bangladeshare concerned.Basically, all Indian Muslims’
forefathers were Hindus, but, under certain circumstances were
convertedto Islam. We should aim to educate Indian Muslim on certain
issues, if they want to stay in harmony with Hindus .Otherwise they
should be ready to face Hindu backlash.We should gear up to save our
Bharatmata, Hindu religion and culture.
------------------------------------------------xxx-------------------------------------------------
POINTS TO NOTE
Here is something, worth studying and given a serious thought.
There are nearly 52 Muslim countries, in the world.
1. Show one Muslim country, which provides Haj subsidy.(now
discontinued)
2. Show one Muslim country where Hindus are extended the special
rights that Muslims are accorded in India?
3. Show one Muslim country, which has/had a Non-Muslim as its
President or Prime Minister.
4. Show one Mullah or Maulvi who has declared a 'fatwa' against
terrorists.
5. Hindu-majority Maharashtra,Bihar,Kerala, Pondicherry, etc. have,
in the past elected Muslims as CM's.Can you ever imagine a Hindu
becoming the CM of Muslim majority J&K?
6. In 1947,When India was partitioned, the Hindu population in
Pakistan was about 24%. Today it is not even 1%. In 1947, the
Hindu population in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) was 30%.
Today it is about 7%. What happened to the missing Hindus? Do
Hindus have human rights? In contrast,in India, Muslim population
has gone up from 10.4% in1951 to about14% today; whereas Hindu
population has come down from 87.2% in 1951 to 85% in 1991. Do
you still think that Hindus are fundamentalists?

43 | P a g e
7. In India today Hindus are majority. If Hindus are intolerant, how
come Masjids and madrasas are thriving? How come Muslims are
offering Namaz on the road?
8. How come Muslimsare proclaiming 5 times a day on loud speakers
that there is no God except Allah?
9. When Hindus gave to Muslims 30% of Bharat for a song, why
should Hindus, now beg for their sacred places at Ayodhya,
Mathura and Kashi?
10. Why Gandhiji objected to the decision of the cabinet and insisted
that Somnath Temple should be reconstructed out of public fund,
not governmentfunds.When in January1948 he pressurized Nehru
and Patel to carry on renovation of the Mosques of Delhi at
government expenses?
11. Why Gandhisupported Khilafat Movement (nothing to do with our
freedom movement).
12. If Muslims & Christians are minorities in Maharashtra, UP, Bihar
etc, are Hindus not minorities in J&K, Mizoram, Nagaland,
ArunachalPradesh, Meghalaya etc? Why Hindus are denied
minority rights in these states?
13. When Haj pilgrims are given subsidy, why Hindu pilgrims to
Amaranth, Sabarimalai & Kailash Mansarovar are taxed?
14. When Christian and Muslim schools can teach Bible and Quran,
why Hindus cannot teach Gita or Ramayan in our schools?
15. Do you admit that Hindus do have problems that need to be
recognized? Or do you think that those who call themselves
“Hindus” are themselves The problem?
16. Why post- Godhrais blown out of proportion,when no one talks of
the ethnic cleansing of 4 lakh Hindus from Kashmir?
17. Do you consider that - Sanskrit is communal and Urdu is secular,
Mandir is Communal and Masjid is Secular, Sadhu is Communal
and Imamis secular, BJP is communal and Muslim league is
Secular, Dr.Praveeni Togadia is antinational, and Bhukari is
Secular, Vande Matharam is communal and Allah-O-Akbar is
secular, Hinduism is Communal and Islam is Secular, Hindutva is
communaland Jihadism is secular.Bharatis communaland Italy is
Secular?

44 | P a g e
18. Why temple funds are spent for the welfare of Muslims and
Christians, when they are free to spend their money in any way
they like?
19. When uniform is made compulsory for school children, why there
is no Uniform Civil Code for citizens? In what way, J&K is different
from Maharashtra,Tamilnadu or UttarPradesh,to have Article 370?
20. Abdul Rehman Antuley (earlier one of the CMs of Maharashtra)was
made a trustee of the famous SiddhiVinayakTemple in Prabhadevi,
Mumbai.Cana Hindu - say Mulayam or Laloo ever become a trustee
of a Masjid or Madrasa?
21. Dr. Praveen Togadia has been arrested many times on flimsy
grounds. Has the Shahi Imam of Jama Masjid, Delhi, Ahmed
Bhukari been arrested for claiming to be an ISI agent and
advocating partition of Bharat?”
We are a rare breed, who believes in the slogan “sab chalta hai “. Let
Bombay be bombed 100 times, we will absorb each recurrent blow,
quiver and do nothing but pronounced to the world “Bombay is
vibrant”. Something is going wrong somewhere.
---------------------------------------------------------xxx----------------------------------------
SAVDHAN INDIA AND DASTAK
(All that is necessary for evil to succeed is, for good men to do
nothing---Edmund Burke.)
1. Two TV serials, based on real crime stories in India, there names being
“Sawadhan India” and “Dastak. “, show real crime cases of India. The
meaning of “Sawadhan India” is to alert people, as somewhere crime is
taking place. “Dastak” means that, a criminal, before actually committing
a crime, gives some indications about the impending crime, by his
pattern of behaviour. Dastak is equivalent to indications of what is going
to happen. These real stories and the headings should keep Hindus
thinking and worrying, which are related to bigger issues for India.
2. For the past few year’s happenings, in India, were startling. First, the
riot like situation at the Azad maidan in Mumbai, where lakhs of Muslims
gather to show their support to Muslims of Assam. The photographs

45 | P a g e
published, showed the autocracies committed against Muslims from
Assam. This caused, riot like situation.(However, the fact came out that
the photographs were taken in Burma.) During the demonstration, the
demonstrators, destroyed national monument, connected with war,
stripped a woman police officer, attacked police station and personnel.
The mob had weapons like AK 47. The state government failed to take
any action against the defaulters.(or did NOT take action intentially) The
media did not give adequate coverage and quickly the matter was
forgotten. Secondly, a prominent Muslim MP from Hyderabad,
publically, in his public meeting at Hyderabad, said that if police are
withdrawn for 15 minutes we (the Muslim) will wipe out Hindus. Some
more utterances in public by prominent Muslim leaders are attached as
APPENDIX A. (MUST READ. These are factual). Thirdly, Four
educated Muslim youth went to Iraq and 90 from Kerala and AP went to
Syria to fight for ISIS(Islamic State of Iraq and Syria).ISIS has set up
Caliphate, .Fourthly, Maulana Salman Nakvis,(An Indian) has written an
open letter to Saudi Arabia, asking to receive an army of five lakh Indian
Sunni youth, to fight Shiites in Iraq. Fifthly, riots between Muslim and
Sikh, about the ownership of land at Saharanpur on religious ground.
Sixthly, prominence given in all print and electronic media, regarding
absence of Iftar parties, by NDA ministers and PM, amounting to as if,
great sin has been committed. Seventhly, flags of ISIS started
appearing in Kashmir valley.
Other Dastaks.
3. First, Sachhar committee findings were absolutely pro Muslims.
Second, Even Ex PM Dr MM Singh had said, while he was the PM, that
the first right to Indian recourses is of minorities (especially Muslim,) as
they are major of the minorities. Third, anti riot bill proposed by UPA
and Mrs S Gandhi was anti Hindus. It is an eye opening, how a minority
appeasing government can go to any extent to destroy this nation and
Hindus. Fourthly, watching and listening national debates on major TV
news channels. It all ends up in supporting minorities and blaming
majority. Fifthly, rise of Wahabi Islam in India (especially in Kerala, AP,
MP, Chhattisgarh and Maharashtra). A decade ago, Wahabies were 10
% of Muslim population of Muslims of India, now it is 28%. This
assessment is from IB. Wahabies preaches hardest form of Islam.
Sixthly, Wahabi’s (Saudi’s) are building madaras all over India for
making Muslims into militant Islam. Seventhly, ongoing invasion by
Bangladeshis, from Bangladesh..

46 | P a g e
Mahatma Gandhi and Muslims.
4. At this stage it is relevant to point out roles played by the prominent
national leaders, in the past. Mahatma Gandhi’s policies towards the
Muslims in India were of appeasement, in an effort to keep them within
united India. He believed that love begets love and that concessions to
Muslims would be reciprocated. His appeasement policies led nowhere
and failed miserably. In spite the country was divided on religion basis,
Gandhi begged Muslim residing in parts of India not to go to Pakistan
and remain in India, without realising the consequences. He even asked
Hindus to surrender before Muslims. Gandhi favoured Jawaharlal Nehru
and Nehru family, for obvious reasons. (Please see the documentary
evidence available in public domain).There were more able people than
Nehru to lead the nation. Jawaharlal Nehru’s, policies, towards the
Muslims, in India, were, of appeasement. The story about marriage of
Indira Gandhi to Firoz Khan and subsequent, change of name to Firoz
Gandhi is well known. Mahatma Gandhi helped them to change their
name to Gandhi. (This was ethically wrong). The people of India
(uneducated,and educated)think,that the members of the present
Gandhi family, are decedents of Mahatma Gandhi. Rajiv Gandhi
converted to Christianity and of course Sonia Gandhi is Christian. Thus
we were ruled by Muslims and Christian dynasties, after independence,
up till now.
5. Gandhi made Hindus impotent by his teaching. We are under wrong
impression that Gandhi gave us freedom and he “drove away” British. In
this connection, it is worth to read following:
“Apart from revisionist historians, it was none other than Lord Clement
Atlee himself, the British Prime Minister responsible for conceding
independence to India, who gave a shattering blow to the myth sought to
be perpetuated by court historians, that Gandhi and his movement had
led the country to freedom. Chief Justice P.B. Chakrabarty of Calcutta
High Court, who had also served as the acting Governor of West Bengal
in India, disclosed the following in a letter addressed to the publisher of
Dr. R.C. Majumdar’s book --A History of Bengal. The Chief Justice
wrote: ‘ My direct question to him (Atlee) was that since Gandhi’s “Quit
India” movement had tapered off quite some time ago and in 1947 no
such new compelling situation had arisen that would necessitate a hasty
British departure, why did they have to leave? In his reply, Atlee cited
several reasons, the principal among them being the erosion of

Saving Hinduism from the brink of extinction: Major General V S Karnik (Retd).

Saving Hinduism from the brink of extinction: Major General V S Karnik (Retd).

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (19)

Similar to Saving Hinduism from the brink of extinction: Major General V S Karnik (Retd).

Similar to Saving Hinduism from the brink of extinction: Major General V S Karnik (Retd). (20)

More from Upananda Bramhachari

More from Upananda Bramhachari (15)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Saving Hinduism from the brink of extinction: Major General V S Karnik (Retd).