Former Senator Rick Santorum argued that Indiana's original religious freedom law was a good bill that should not have been changed. He believes tolerance needs to be a two-way street, and businesses should not be forced to participate in activities they disagree with for religious reasons. However, others say such laws could allow discrimination against various groups including LGBT individuals, religious minorities, and racial groups. Major tech companies are expected to publicly advocate for laws preventing discrimination against gays and lesbians. Santorum has not yet decided if he will run for president in 2016.
LGBT is a huge issue in a country like India. One one side where people are fighting for the bill to be passed on the other side the people falling in category of LGBT is not given proper rights to live life accordingly. In this scenario the question arises , Are We Ready To Accept the LGBT Rights?
What is a sex crime and how do you know the charges you are facing are related to a sex crime? When do you call a lawyer?
There are so many questions when accused of any sexual crime at any time.
LGBT is a huge issue in a country like India. One one side where people are fighting for the bill to be passed on the other side the people falling in category of LGBT is not given proper rights to live life accordingly. In this scenario the question arises , Are We Ready To Accept the LGBT Rights?
What is a sex crime and how do you know the charges you are facing are related to a sex crime? When do you call a lawyer?
There are so many questions when accused of any sexual crime at any time.
Get your quality homework help now and stand out.Our professional writers are committed to excellence. We have trained the best scholars in different fields of study.Contact us now at premiumessays.net and place your order at affordable price done within set deadlines.We always have someone online ready to answer all your queries and take your requests.
Get your quality homework help now and stand out.Our professional writers are committed to excellence. We have trained the best scholars in different fields of study.Contact us now at premiumessays.net and place your order at affordable price done within set deadlines.We always have someone online ready to answer all your queries and take your requests.
Essay on Same Sex Marriage
Same Sex Marriage
Essay On Same Sex Marriage
Same Sex Marriage Essay
Essay on Same Sex Marriages
In Favor of Same Sex Marriage Essay examples
Ethics of Same Sex Marriage Essay
Essay about Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage
Same-Sex Marriage Essays
Essay On Same Sex Marriage
1 P a g e FINAL EXAM Policy Formulation and Implem.docxhoney725342
1 | P a g e
FINAL EXAM
Policy Formulation and Implementation - PA 6302 A1
Summer 2017
INSTRUCTIONS
The controversy over “Sanctuary Cities” has been a point in the changing immigration landscape
that has stirred much debate and emotion. Please be prepared to discuss the pertinent issues
surrounding the sanctuary cities issue, the current legal requirements that law enforcement
officers must currently abide and any pending or potential legislation on this matter.
After understanding the background, please discuss the practical ramifications to the US
immigration policy, its impact (fiscal and otherwise) and discuss the impact and responsibilities
of federal, state and local governments in this issue.
Also, policy evaluation is important aspect of our discussion, so please discuss in some depth a
process by which consensus—either for or against—may be reached on this issue. How do we
know it will work? And what should we prepared to do if it does not?
Due Date and time: please email your responses to me in MS Word or PDF format at
[email protected] by our class time, 6:30PM, on Wednesday, June 28.
EXAM FORMAT
I would like your response in an essay format. Please keep your responses concise and to the
point, but also thorough. Please maintain the following headings or sections to your response:
1. Issue History and Relevant Facts: in this section, please outline the relevant facts and
brief history as it relates to this issue. Be sure to highlight the point of controversy, or
debate regarding this issue. Please do not provide political commentary but rather
thoughtful analysis of this issue.
2. Potential Areas for Consensus or Resolution: I am interested to know that you have
thought around this issue and have given reasonable analysis to possible issues where
consensus may be gained. This is much the same manner which we discussed in class and
I expect to see your insight and thought process on display.
3. Policy Evaluation: Once action is taken on this issue that you have suggested above,
please discuss a process or mechanism by which to evaluate if this was successful. How
do we know it will work? And what should we prepared to do if it does not?
#####dfWERVSDAFBsdfBsdQWEFVBAEF SDFV 12315100VB
mailto:[email protected]
public
Sticky Note
public
Sticky Note
WEVCWVWVW C
public
Highlight
2 | P a g e
Beyond the format indicated above, I am flexible so long as I can follow your thought process. I
have no recommendations on page limits other than to reiterate that you be concise and
thorough.
Below is an article that provides some background on this issue:
Dallas Joins Lawsuit Over Sanctuary Cities Bill
BY TRIBUNE NEWS SERVICE | JUNE 8, 2017
By Elvia Limón and Robert Wilonsky
Dallas is joining some other Texas cities, including Austin and San Antonio, in taking on the state's
so-called "sanctuary city" law.
Mayor Mike Rawlings made the announcement Wednesd ...
Similar to Santorum on Indiana law: Tolerance is "two-way street" (6)
1 P a g e FINAL EXAM Policy Formulation and Implem.docx
Santorum on Indiana law: Tolerance is "two-way street"
1. Santorum on Indiana law: Tolerance is "two-way street"
Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum said that he had hoped Indiana Gov. Mike Pence wouldn't
have asked for changes to a controversial religious freedom law the state legislature passed, arguing
that now the federal government and the state have "a pretty limited view" of religious liberty.
"I certainly can't say that it's a bad bill. It's a good bill," Santorum said on CBS' "Face the Nation"
Sunday. "But...it doesn't really open the debate up on some of the more current issues."
"I think we need to look at, as religious liberty is now being pushed harder, to provide more religious
protections and that bill doesn't do that," he added.
Indiana's original religious freedom bill, signed earlier this month, came under intense national
scrutiny after critics said that it gave people and businesses permission to deny services to gays and
lesbians. Many major businesses including Apple were critical as well, leading Pence to call for the
legislature to update the measure. Thursday afternoon, he signed an updated version of the law that
states it cannot be used to discriminate against anyone, including gay and lesbian customers.
"No business should discriminate against you because of who you are. But it should have the ability
to say we're not going to participate in certain activities that we disagree with from a religious point
of view," Santorum said.
But Sarah Warbelow, the legal director for the Human Rights Campaign, said the Indiana law was
not about protecting people's religious views.
"It explicitly allowed individuals to use their religious beliefs to underline other types of laws not
only against gay, lesbian and transgender people, but against other religious minorities and in some
instances African-Americans lawyers Las Vegas and Asian Americans as well," she said in a separate
interview on "Face the Nation."
Several tech titans like Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg of Facebook, as well as Eric Schmidt
and Larry Page of Google are expected to publicly call for laws that prevent discrimination against
gays and lesbians on Monday.
"They are joining many other important voices in the American business community, from Apple to
Walmart to Angie's list, who are really looking at their employees' whole lives," Warbelow said.
"These companies already offer non-discrimination protections, but they want to make sure that
outside of the workforce their employees are not going to be turned away when they go to a
restaurant, or grocery shopping, or when they go to purchase a home."
Santorum called tolerance a "two-way street." As http://law.ggu.edu/ an example, he asked whether
a gay man should be forced to print signs reading "God hates fags" for the Westboro Baptist Church.
"Should the government force you to do that? And that's what these cases are all about," he said.
"This is where I think we just need some space to say, 'let's have some tolerance be a two-way
street.'"
2. He also said that as attitudes toward gay marriage shift across the country, there needs to be a
conversation about "respecting people on both sides of the issues."
"I think that's where you have to differentiate between discrimination against the person, because of
who they are, and unwillingness to participate in actions because they're inconsistent with your
religious beliefs," Santorum said.
Warbelow said that there are over 100 bills that have been introduced in state legislatures
"attempting to target the LGBT community." She said the Human Rights Campaign is going to be
focusing their attention on Texas and South Carolina in particular, because they are considering
religious freedom bills similar to what was originally passed in Indiana.
On the presidential front, Santorum - who won the 2012 Iowa caucus and is eyeing another
presidential bid - said he has not yet made a decision about 2016.
"I'm going through the process that I think 17 or 18 other folks are going through right now, which
is trying to determine whether your message is a good message and out there delivering a message
on making sure we have a message that unifies the country," he said.
He said he has tried to focus his message on helping those who have been left behind in the
economy.
"We have to give them an opportunity to be able to reach that American dream again and then I
think Republicans, frankly, have been very weak on that," he said.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/santorum-indiana-shouldnt-have-changed-religious-freedom-law/