SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
I
n June 2012, the 19th Engi-
neer Battalion, Fort Knox,
Kentucky, received an order
to support the 20th Engineer
Brigade severe weather response
force mission in the U.S. North-
ern Command area of operations
from July to November 2012.
With the unit focused on support-
ing the Defense Chemical, Bio-
logical, Radiological, and Nuclear
Response Force (DCRF) and Com-
mand and Control Chemical, Bio-
logical, Radiological, and Nuclear
Response Element (C2CRE) mis-
sions, plus planning for a deploy-
ment to the U.S. Central Com-
mand area of operations, the 19th
Engineers faced the challenge
of balancing multiple mission
requirements. Although this did
not present issues that could not
be overcome, it did result in some
challenging moments.
On 29 October 2012, the battalion received an order
placing it on alert to deploy within 24 hours to Joint Base
McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey, and prepare to
provide disaster relief support in the aftermath of Super-
storm Sandy. The engineers prepared to deploy over the next
96 hours, working with Fort Knox installation support agen-
cies while awaiting the execution order from U.S. Forces
Command. During this process, a number of gaps in deploy-
ment preparations were revealed. One issue was cycling
multiple units through the Soldier readiness processing
center. The 15th Engineer Company had been the only 19th
Engineer Battalion unit sourced against the DCRF mission
for the previous 12 months, and the assumption was that it
would be the frst unit used in civil support missions. There-
fore, the battalion had only focused on conducting Soldier
readiness processing for the 15th Engineer Company every
90 days. With the assistance of the Fort Knox agencies, the
battalion was able to complete these requirements quickly.
Also, the battalion was directed to not bring heavy engineer
equipment, which eventually hindered access clearance
operations.
The 19th Engineer Battalion received a verbal order
to deploy on 1 November, which was followed by a written
order the following day. This fnal order did not include the
By Captain Joel W. Prusi
PhotobyMaryMarkos,USACE,St.LouisDistrict
An Air Force member of JTF Pump helps clear water from
Breezy Point, New York.
PhotobyMaryMarkos,USACE,St.LouisDistrict
Members of JTF Pump removed an average of 750,000 to 1 million gallons of water
per day in the week following Superstorm Sandy.
Engineer 15January–April 2013
January–April 201316 Engineer
15th Engineer Company, but did direct the 76th Engineer
Company to deploy. An advance party of seven Soldiers,
including the battalion commander, deployed from Fort
Knox on an aircraft provided by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE), North Atlantic District. The party
met with leaders from Joint Task Force (JTF) Sandy and
USACE, conducted reconnaissance in New York City, and
established life support for follow-on forces.
The main body deployed on 3 November. Convoy com-
manders carried maps that noted the locations of mainte-
nance support activities and fuel stations along the route.
Overnight stopping points were selected along the route,
with the understanding that convoy commanders would
make the fnal decisions about where to stop, based on the
state of their convoy. The convoys traveled for 2 days to
reach Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst and faced few
maintenance issues along the way.
By the time the convoys arrived at Joint Base McGuire-
Dix-Lakehurst, the advance party had coordinated with
installation agencies to set up joint reception, staging,
onward movement, and integration in-processing.
Elements of Headquarters, Headquarters Company,
and the Forward Support Company then traveled to
Fort Hamilton, New York, to link up with the battal-
ion commander, set up the joint tactical operations
center, and establish mission command.
The mission command relationship for this opera-
tion was unique. JTF Sandy was a dual-status
command, led by the commander of the 53d Troop
Command, New York Army National Guard. JTF
Pump, led by the 19th Engineer Battalion com-
mander, served as a subordinate element of more
than 600 Soldiers, Marines, Sailors, and Airmen.
In addition to the elements from the 19th Engineer
Battalion, units included the following:
■ 86th Engineer Dive Team, U.S. Army.
■ 401st, 410th, and 431st Quartermaster Teams,
U.S. Army Reserve.
■ 11th, 28th, 366th, and 633d Civil Engineer
Squadrons, U.S. Air Force.
■ 823d RED HORSE1
Squadron, U.S. Air Force.
■ Joint Communication Support Element, U.S. Air
Force.
■ Mobile Dive and Salvage Unit 2, U.S. Navy.
■ Naval Marine Construction Battalion 5, U.S.
Navy.
■ 8th Engineer Support Battalion, U.S. Marine
Corps.
Mission command issues presented the most im-
mediate diffculty on arrival at JTF Sandy. The
number of organizations and the speed at which
they arrived conspired to create an environment
without clear lines of authority. This was apparent with civ-
ilian and military organizations. Many organizations, at all
levels, called the JTF Pump operations center directly to
request reports, rather than using appropriate chains of
command to gather information. Tactical missions were
received from the USACE, North Atlantic District, even
though JTF Pump was never offcially task-organized under
its control. Another mission command issue was the crea-
tion and enforcement of consistent reporting requirements
with subordinate units from different Service cultures. This
made tracking operations during the frst days challenging.
JTF Pump also confronted the challenges of legal restric-
tions on the use of military personnel for recovery work.
They were not permitted to conduct debris clearance opera-
tions or assist citizens inside their homes unless the work
was tied to an offcial mission requirement with the pres-
ence of civil authorities. JTF Pump leaders had to inform
communities of these constraints so that there was a shared
understanding of what tasks Service members could and
could not perform.
The storm’s tidal surge devastated Breezy Point.
caption
Engineer 17January–April 2013
Pumping operations were conducted throughout
three of the fve boroughs of New York City and in
communities on Long Island, New York, and in New
Jersey. Many of the dewatered buildings belonged
to the New York City Housing Authority, includ-
ing Redfern Housing Complex in Far Rockaway and
Red Hook housing projects in Queens. JTF Pump
discovered that more control was needed on some of
these tasks, since engineers frequently received only
general descriptions of the buildings to be dewatered
and sometimes ended up dewatering the same build-
ings multiple times due to refooding.
Mobile Dive and Salvage Unit 2 conducted opera-
tions in the basement of One World Trade Center
(commonly known as Freedom Tower), removing
more than 770,000 gallons of water and enabling
contractors to restart work. The 86th Engineer Dive
Team helped the New York City Fire Department
and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
conduct dewatering operations in the Port Authority
Trans-Hudson station and tunnel in Jersey City. The
team also conducted pier inspections and repair with
Mobile Dive and Salvage Unit 2 at the U.S. Coast
Guard, Battery Park Pier C facility in New York.
The wastewater treatment plant for Long Beach,
New York, suffered a failure of its main intake
pumps. Crews of Air Force civil engineers rotated
through the plant, conducting 24-hour operations
to pump 3,100,000 gallons of water and prevent
fooding.
The largest continuous project for the Soldiers,
Marines, Sailors, and Airmen of JTF Pump was the opera-
tion at Breezy Point in Queens, New York. This penin-
sular community had been fooded by the tidal surge of
Superstorm Sandy. Fires had broken out in the aftermath
and destroyed more than 90 homes. As operations in other
areas wound down, this project became the focus for task
force efforts. The proj-
ect required extensive
access clearance opera-
tions to open narrow
walkways throughout
the community. Indi-
vidual pumping sites
were small and were far
from drainage locations.
This required frequent
pump moves and the
elaborate chaining of
hoses to remove standing
water from public areas.
Access clearance opera-
tions were slowed notice-
ably by the earlier order
JTF Pump personnel helped speed access to communities dam-
aged by the storm.
The 76th Engineer Com-
pany convoy gathers
in front of the Brooklyn
Public Library.
PhotobyMaryMarkos,USACE,St.LouisDistrict
January–April 201318 Engineer
Dedication
The following members of the Engineer Regiment have been lost in overseas contingency operations since the last
issue of Engineer. We dedicate this issue to them.
Staff Sergeant Rayvon Battle, Jr. 38th Engineer Company, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington
4th Stryker Brigade Combat Team
Sergeant Brett E. Gornewicz 444th Engineer Company, 479th Engineer Battalion Oswego, New York
Specialist Ryan P. Jayne 444th Engineer Company, 479th Engineer Battalion Oswego, New York
Sergeant First Class Darren M. Linde 818th Engineer Company, 164th Engineer Battalion Williston, North Dakota
Specialist Tyler J. Orgaard 818th Engineer Company, 164th Engineer Battalion Williston, North Dakota
Private First Class Markie T. Sims 38th Engineer Company, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington
4th Stryker Brigade Combat Team
Staff Sergeant Dain T. Venne 444th Engineer Company, 479th Engineer Battalion Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington
to leave heavy engineer equipment back at Fort Knox. The
Army 76th Engineer Company and Marine 8th Engineer
Support Battalion persevered in conducting the opera-
tions in conjunction with the New York City Department of
Sanitation, moving debris from access ways to parking lots
where Department of Sanitation loaders and trucks could
transport it to landſlls. More than 1,000 tons of material
were moved in this fashion. The terrain presented unique
opportunities for the Marine and Navy components of
JTF Pump, which conducted 2 days of amphibious land-
ings on the beaches at Breezy Point to move their person-
nel and equipment into position. They removed more than
8,000,000 gallons of water during 9 days of operations in
this area.
After 15 November, there were no further requirements
for pumping missions. Units began retrograde operations
back to their home stations. The 19th Engineer Battal-
ion traveled back to Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst
to regroup and prepare for the long convoy back to Fort
Knox, returning safely on 19 November. The military
personnel of JTF Pump acquitted themselves well. More
than 13,200,000 gallons of water and 1,300 tons of debris
were removed from public areas in New York and New Jer-
sey. Military forces expended 10,500 man-hours in success-
ful joint operations to support the citizens of the Nation in
their hour of need.
Endnote:
1
Rapid Engineer Deployable Heavy Operational Repair
Squadron Engineer.
Captain Prusi is the assistant training ofſcer for the 19th
Engineer Battalion. He holds a bachelor’s degree in civil
engineering from Michigan Technological University and a
master’s degree in civil engineering from Missouri University
of Science and Technology in Rolla. He is a graduate of Army
Ofſcer Candidate School, the Engineer Ofſcer Basic Course,
and the Engineer Captains Career Course.

More Related Content

What's hot

Resme Capt. Gary Kassbaum 2014
Resme Capt. Gary  Kassbaum 2014Resme Capt. Gary  Kassbaum 2014
Resme Capt. Gary Kassbaum 2014Gary Kassbaum
 
NMOC News april 16
NMOC News april 16NMOC News april 16
NMOC News april 16dyannafrye
 
US Navy Instruction Confirms Retirement of Nuclear Tomahawk Cruise Missile
US Navy Instruction Confirms Retirement of Nuclear Tomahawk Cruise MissileUS Navy Instruction Confirms Retirement of Nuclear Tomahawk Cruise Missile
US Navy Instruction Confirms Retirement of Nuclear Tomahawk Cruise MissileDaniel Ross
 
Austin Environmental and Public Health Resume 2013
Austin Environmental and Public Health Resume 2013Austin Environmental and Public Health Resume 2013
Austin Environmental and Public Health Resume 2013John Austin, Ph.D.
 

What's hot (20)

A Day In The Navy 17jul09
A Day In The Navy    17jul09A Day In The Navy    17jul09
A Day In The Navy 17jul09
 
Necc in the_news_08_march13 for web
Necc in the_news_08_march13 for webNecc in the_news_08_march13 for web
Necc in the_news_08_march13 for web
 
A day in the navy - nov 4 2012
A day in the navy  - nov 4 2012A day in the navy  - nov 4 2012
A day in the navy - nov 4 2012
 
A day in the navy - august 25, 2010
A day in the navy  - august 25, 2010A day in the navy  - august 25, 2010
A day in the navy - august 25, 2010
 
A day in the Navy - April 14, 2010
A day in the Navy  - April 14, 2010A day in the Navy  - April 14, 2010
A day in the Navy - April 14, 2010
 
Necc in the_news_22_march13 for web
Necc in the_news_22_march13 for webNecc in the_news_22_march13 for web
Necc in the_news_22_march13 for web
 
A day in the navy july 20 2011
A day in the navy july 20 2011A day in the navy july 20 2011
A day in the navy july 20 2011
 
Necc in the_news_07_feb13
Necc in the_news_07_feb13Necc in the_news_07_feb13
Necc in the_news_07_feb13
 
Resme Capt. Gary Kassbaum 2014
Resme Capt. Gary  Kassbaum 2014Resme Capt. Gary  Kassbaum 2014
Resme Capt. Gary Kassbaum 2014
 
A day in the navy april 11 2011
A day in the navy april 11 2011A day in the navy april 11 2011
A day in the navy april 11 2011
 
A day in the navy - september 14, 2010
A day in the navy  - september 14, 2010A day in the navy  - september 14, 2010
A day in the navy - september 14, 2010
 
A Day In The Navy 10jan09
A Day In The Navy    10jan09A Day In The Navy    10jan09
A Day In The Navy 10jan09
 
A day in the navy aug 18 2011
A day in the navy aug 18 2011A day in the navy aug 18 2011
A day in the navy aug 18 2011
 
NMOC News april 16
NMOC News april 16NMOC News april 16
NMOC News april 16
 
A Day In The Navy 24mar09
A Day In The Navy    24mar09A Day In The Navy    24mar09
A Day In The Navy 24mar09
 
A Day In The Navy 24jul08
A Day In The Navy    24jul08A Day In The Navy    24jul08
A Day In The Navy 24jul08
 
A Day In The Navy 19feb09
A Day In The Navy    19feb09A Day In The Navy    19feb09
A Day In The Navy 19feb09
 
US Navy Instruction Confirms Retirement of Nuclear Tomahawk Cruise Missile
US Navy Instruction Confirms Retirement of Nuclear Tomahawk Cruise MissileUS Navy Instruction Confirms Retirement of Nuclear Tomahawk Cruise Missile
US Navy Instruction Confirms Retirement of Nuclear Tomahawk Cruise Missile
 
Austin Environmental and Public Health Resume 2013
Austin Environmental and Public Health Resume 2013Austin Environmental and Public Health Resume 2013
Austin Environmental and Public Health Resume 2013
 
A Day In The Navy 18sep08
A Day In The Navy    18sep08A Day In The Navy    18sep08
A Day In The Navy 18sep08
 

Viewers also liked

Purplecode - HR Consulting
Purplecode - HR ConsultingPurplecode - HR Consulting
Purplecode - HR ConsultingSareeta Nair
 
Prefarbrication Partner
Prefarbrication PartnerPrefarbrication Partner
Prefarbrication PartnerGraeme Simmers
 
Purplecode - HR Consulting
Purplecode - HR ConsultingPurplecode - HR Consulting
Purplecode - HR ConsultingSareeta Nair
 
車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-07-29
車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-07-29車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-07-29
車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-07-29Ken Takahashi
 
CPS - Faster from the Start
CPS - Faster from the StartCPS - Faster from the Start
CPS - Faster from the StartGraeme Simmers
 
Mining Market_MB-306 REV E
Mining Market_MB-306 REV EMining Market_MB-306 REV E
Mining Market_MB-306 REV EGraeme Simmers
 
Commercial Building Services
Commercial Building ServicesCommercial Building Services
Commercial Building ServicesGraeme Simmers
 
電通大発、働き方を伝えるメディア  UEQareer
電通大発、働き方を伝えるメディア  UEQareer電通大発、働き方を伝えるメディア  UEQareer
電通大発、働き方を伝えるメディア  UEQareerKen Takahashi
 
車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-06-29
車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-06-29車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-06-29
車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-06-29Ken Takahashi
 

Viewers also liked (11)

Purplecode - HR Consulting
Purplecode - HR ConsultingPurplecode - HR Consulting
Purplecode - HR Consulting
 
Prefarbrication Partner
Prefarbrication PartnerPrefarbrication Partner
Prefarbrication Partner
 
Purplecode - HR Consulting
Purplecode - HR ConsultingPurplecode - HR Consulting
Purplecode - HR Consulting
 
lloyd_article
lloyd_articlelloyd_article
lloyd_article
 
車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-07-29
車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-07-29車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-07-29
車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-07-29
 
[4] rpp pkn
[4] rpp pkn[4] rpp pkn
[4] rpp pkn
 
CPS - Faster from the Start
CPS - Faster from the StartCPS - Faster from the Start
CPS - Faster from the Start
 
Mining Market_MB-306 REV E
Mining Market_MB-306 REV EMining Market_MB-306 REV E
Mining Market_MB-306 REV E
 
Commercial Building Services
Commercial Building ServicesCommercial Building Services
Commercial Building Services
 
電通大発、働き方を伝えるメディア  UEQareer
電通大発、働き方を伝えるメディア  UEQareer電通大発、働き方を伝えるメディア  UEQareer
電通大発、働き方を伝えるメディア  UEQareer
 
車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-06-29
車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-06-29車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-06-29
車で手軽に健康管理「QarDoc」開発に向けて 2016-06-29
 

Similar to 19th Engineer Battalion Responds to Superstorm Sandy

Faceplate NOV 2012 Page 19, Vic Marolda
Faceplate NOV 2012 Page 19, Vic MaroldaFaceplate NOV 2012 Page 19, Vic Marolda
Faceplate NOV 2012 Page 19, Vic Maroldachrisrobschu
 
Jason Abendroth Project experience_10_2015
Jason Abendroth Project experience_10_2015Jason Abendroth Project experience_10_2015
Jason Abendroth Project experience_10_2015Jason Abendroth, PE
 
NewEnglandDistrict_USACE_2013
NewEnglandDistrict_USACE_2013NewEnglandDistrict_USACE_2013
NewEnglandDistrict_USACE_2013R. J. Cannata
 
(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS T
(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS T(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS T
(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS TSilvaGraf83
 
(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS T
(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS T(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS T
(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS TMoseStaton39
 
Nmoc news may 21
Nmoc news may 21Nmoc news may 21
Nmoc news may 21dyannafrye
 

Similar to 19th Engineer Battalion Responds to Superstorm Sandy (20)

Amphibious Shipping Shortfalls
Amphibious Shipping ShortfallsAmphibious Shipping Shortfalls
Amphibious Shipping Shortfalls
 
New jersey
New jerseyNew jersey
New jersey
 
New jersey
New jerseyNew jersey
New jersey
 
A Day In The Navy 17aug09
A Day In The Navy    17aug09A Day In The Navy    17aug09
A Day In The Navy 17aug09
 
A day in the navy march 15 2011
A day in the navy march 15 2011A day in the navy march 15 2011
A day in the navy march 15 2011
 
A day in the navy - jan 21 2013
A day in the navy  - jan 21 2013A day in the navy  - jan 21 2013
A day in the navy - jan 21 2013
 
Faceplate NOV 2012 Page 19, Vic Marolda
Faceplate NOV 2012 Page 19, Vic MaroldaFaceplate NOV 2012 Page 19, Vic Marolda
Faceplate NOV 2012 Page 19, Vic Marolda
 
Necc in the_news_05_april13
Necc in the_news_05_april13Necc in the_news_05_april13
Necc in the_news_05_april13
 
putnam engineering geophysics 2007
putnam engineering geophysics 2007putnam engineering geophysics 2007
putnam engineering geophysics 2007
 
Jason Abendroth Project experience_10_2015
Jason Abendroth Project experience_10_2015Jason Abendroth Project experience_10_2015
Jason Abendroth Project experience_10_2015
 
A day in the Navy - June 10, 2010
A day in the Navy  - June 10, 2010A day in the Navy  - June 10, 2010
A day in the Navy - June 10, 2010
 
A day in the navy july 20 2011
A day in the navy july 20 2011A day in the navy july 20 2011
A day in the navy july 20 2011
 
A day in the navy - feb 27 2013
A day in the navy  - feb 27 2013A day in the navy  - feb 27 2013
A day in the navy - feb 27 2013
 
A Day In The Navy 20aug08
A Day In The Navy    20aug08A Day In The Navy    20aug08
A Day In The Navy 20aug08
 
NewEnglandDistrict_USACE_2013
NewEnglandDistrict_USACE_2013NewEnglandDistrict_USACE_2013
NewEnglandDistrict_USACE_2013
 
Npc force weekly 5 9 dec 2011
Npc force weekly 5 9 dec  2011Npc force weekly 5 9 dec  2011
Npc force weekly 5 9 dec 2011
 
(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS T
(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS T(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS T
(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS T
 
(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS T
(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS T(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS T
(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS T
 
Nmoc news may 21
Nmoc news may 21Nmoc news may 21
Nmoc news may 21
 
A Day In The Navy January 25 2010
A Day In The Navy January 25 2010A Day In The Navy January 25 2010
A Day In The Navy January 25 2010
 

19th Engineer Battalion Responds to Superstorm Sandy

  • 1. I n June 2012, the 19th Engi- neer Battalion, Fort Knox, Kentucky, received an order to support the 20th Engineer Brigade severe weather response force mission in the U.S. North- ern Command area of operations from July to November 2012. With the unit focused on support- ing the Defense Chemical, Bio- logical, Radiological, and Nuclear Response Force (DCRF) and Com- mand and Control Chemical, Bio- logical, Radiological, and Nuclear Response Element (C2CRE) mis- sions, plus planning for a deploy- ment to the U.S. Central Com- mand area of operations, the 19th Engineers faced the challenge of balancing multiple mission requirements. Although this did not present issues that could not be overcome, it did result in some challenging moments. On 29 October 2012, the battalion received an order placing it on alert to deploy within 24 hours to Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey, and prepare to provide disaster relief support in the aftermath of Super- storm Sandy. The engineers prepared to deploy over the next 96 hours, working with Fort Knox installation support agen- cies while awaiting the execution order from U.S. Forces Command. During this process, a number of gaps in deploy- ment preparations were revealed. One issue was cycling multiple units through the Soldier readiness processing center. The 15th Engineer Company had been the only 19th Engineer Battalion unit sourced against the DCRF mission for the previous 12 months, and the assumption was that it would be the frst unit used in civil support missions. There- fore, the battalion had only focused on conducting Soldier readiness processing for the 15th Engineer Company every 90 days. With the assistance of the Fort Knox agencies, the battalion was able to complete these requirements quickly. Also, the battalion was directed to not bring heavy engineer equipment, which eventually hindered access clearance operations. The 19th Engineer Battalion received a verbal order to deploy on 1 November, which was followed by a written order the following day. This fnal order did not include the By Captain Joel W. Prusi PhotobyMaryMarkos,USACE,St.LouisDistrict An Air Force member of JTF Pump helps clear water from Breezy Point, New York. PhotobyMaryMarkos,USACE,St.LouisDistrict Members of JTF Pump removed an average of 750,000 to 1 million gallons of water per day in the week following Superstorm Sandy. Engineer 15January–April 2013
  • 2. January–April 201316 Engineer 15th Engineer Company, but did direct the 76th Engineer Company to deploy. An advance party of seven Soldiers, including the battalion commander, deployed from Fort Knox on an aircraft provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), North Atlantic District. The party met with leaders from Joint Task Force (JTF) Sandy and USACE, conducted reconnaissance in New York City, and established life support for follow-on forces. The main body deployed on 3 November. Convoy com- manders carried maps that noted the locations of mainte- nance support activities and fuel stations along the route. Overnight stopping points were selected along the route, with the understanding that convoy commanders would make the fnal decisions about where to stop, based on the state of their convoy. The convoys traveled for 2 days to reach Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst and faced few maintenance issues along the way. By the time the convoys arrived at Joint Base McGuire- Dix-Lakehurst, the advance party had coordinated with installation agencies to set up joint reception, staging, onward movement, and integration in-processing. Elements of Headquarters, Headquarters Company, and the Forward Support Company then traveled to Fort Hamilton, New York, to link up with the battal- ion commander, set up the joint tactical operations center, and establish mission command. The mission command relationship for this opera- tion was unique. JTF Sandy was a dual-status command, led by the commander of the 53d Troop Command, New York Army National Guard. JTF Pump, led by the 19th Engineer Battalion com- mander, served as a subordinate element of more than 600 Soldiers, Marines, Sailors, and Airmen. In addition to the elements from the 19th Engineer Battalion, units included the following: ■ 86th Engineer Dive Team, U.S. Army. ■ 401st, 410th, and 431st Quartermaster Teams, U.S. Army Reserve. ■ 11th, 28th, 366th, and 633d Civil Engineer Squadrons, U.S. Air Force. ■ 823d RED HORSE1 Squadron, U.S. Air Force. ■ Joint Communication Support Element, U.S. Air Force. ■ Mobile Dive and Salvage Unit 2, U.S. Navy. ■ Naval Marine Construction Battalion 5, U.S. Navy. ■ 8th Engineer Support Battalion, U.S. Marine Corps. Mission command issues presented the most im- mediate diffculty on arrival at JTF Sandy. The number of organizations and the speed at which they arrived conspired to create an environment without clear lines of authority. This was apparent with civ- ilian and military organizations. Many organizations, at all levels, called the JTF Pump operations center directly to request reports, rather than using appropriate chains of command to gather information. Tactical missions were received from the USACE, North Atlantic District, even though JTF Pump was never offcially task-organized under its control. Another mission command issue was the crea- tion and enforcement of consistent reporting requirements with subordinate units from different Service cultures. This made tracking operations during the frst days challenging. JTF Pump also confronted the challenges of legal restric- tions on the use of military personnel for recovery work. They were not permitted to conduct debris clearance opera- tions or assist citizens inside their homes unless the work was tied to an offcial mission requirement with the pres- ence of civil authorities. JTF Pump leaders had to inform communities of these constraints so that there was a shared understanding of what tasks Service members could and could not perform. The storm’s tidal surge devastated Breezy Point.
  • 3. caption Engineer 17January–April 2013 Pumping operations were conducted throughout three of the fve boroughs of New York City and in communities on Long Island, New York, and in New Jersey. Many of the dewatered buildings belonged to the New York City Housing Authority, includ- ing Redfern Housing Complex in Far Rockaway and Red Hook housing projects in Queens. JTF Pump discovered that more control was needed on some of these tasks, since engineers frequently received only general descriptions of the buildings to be dewatered and sometimes ended up dewatering the same build- ings multiple times due to refooding. Mobile Dive and Salvage Unit 2 conducted opera- tions in the basement of One World Trade Center (commonly known as Freedom Tower), removing more than 770,000 gallons of water and enabling contractors to restart work. The 86th Engineer Dive Team helped the New York City Fire Department and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey conduct dewatering operations in the Port Authority Trans-Hudson station and tunnel in Jersey City. The team also conducted pier inspections and repair with Mobile Dive and Salvage Unit 2 at the U.S. Coast Guard, Battery Park Pier C facility in New York. The wastewater treatment plant for Long Beach, New York, suffered a failure of its main intake pumps. Crews of Air Force civil engineers rotated through the plant, conducting 24-hour operations to pump 3,100,000 gallons of water and prevent fooding. The largest continuous project for the Soldiers, Marines, Sailors, and Airmen of JTF Pump was the opera- tion at Breezy Point in Queens, New York. This penin- sular community had been fooded by the tidal surge of Superstorm Sandy. Fires had broken out in the aftermath and destroyed more than 90 homes. As operations in other areas wound down, this project became the focus for task force efforts. The proj- ect required extensive access clearance opera- tions to open narrow walkways throughout the community. Indi- vidual pumping sites were small and were far from drainage locations. This required frequent pump moves and the elaborate chaining of hoses to remove standing water from public areas. Access clearance opera- tions were slowed notice- ably by the earlier order JTF Pump personnel helped speed access to communities dam- aged by the storm. The 76th Engineer Com- pany convoy gathers in front of the Brooklyn Public Library. PhotobyMaryMarkos,USACE,St.LouisDistrict
  • 4. January–April 201318 Engineer Dedication The following members of the Engineer Regiment have been lost in overseas contingency operations since the last issue of Engineer. We dedicate this issue to them. Staff Sergeant Rayvon Battle, Jr. 38th Engineer Company, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington 4th Stryker Brigade Combat Team Sergeant Brett E. Gornewicz 444th Engineer Company, 479th Engineer Battalion Oswego, New York Specialist Ryan P. Jayne 444th Engineer Company, 479th Engineer Battalion Oswego, New York Sergeant First Class Darren M. Linde 818th Engineer Company, 164th Engineer Battalion Williston, North Dakota Specialist Tyler J. Orgaard 818th Engineer Company, 164th Engineer Battalion Williston, North Dakota Private First Class Markie T. Sims 38th Engineer Company, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington 4th Stryker Brigade Combat Team Staff Sergeant Dain T. Venne 444th Engineer Company, 479th Engineer Battalion Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington to leave heavy engineer equipment back at Fort Knox. The Army 76th Engineer Company and Marine 8th Engineer Support Battalion persevered in conducting the opera- tions in conjunction with the New York City Department of Sanitation, moving debris from access ways to parking lots where Department of Sanitation loaders and trucks could transport it to landſlls. More than 1,000 tons of material were moved in this fashion. The terrain presented unique opportunities for the Marine and Navy components of JTF Pump, which conducted 2 days of amphibious land- ings on the beaches at Breezy Point to move their person- nel and equipment into position. They removed more than 8,000,000 gallons of water during 9 days of operations in this area. After 15 November, there were no further requirements for pumping missions. Units began retrograde operations back to their home stations. The 19th Engineer Battal- ion traveled back to Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst to regroup and prepare for the long convoy back to Fort Knox, returning safely on 19 November. The military personnel of JTF Pump acquitted themselves well. More than 13,200,000 gallons of water and 1,300 tons of debris were removed from public areas in New York and New Jer- sey. Military forces expended 10,500 man-hours in success- ful joint operations to support the citizens of the Nation in their hour of need. Endnote: 1 Rapid Engineer Deployable Heavy Operational Repair Squadron Engineer. Captain Prusi is the assistant training ofſcer for the 19th Engineer Battalion. He holds a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from Michigan Technological University and a master’s degree in civil engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology in Rolla. He is a graduate of Army Ofſcer Candidate School, the Engineer Ofſcer Basic Course, and the Engineer Captains Career Course.