Rule 82 of O.XXI discusses the rules regarding sales of immovable property in execution of decrees. It states that such sales may be ordered by any court other than a small causes court. It also allows the judgment debtor to apply to postpone the sale if they can show they may be able to raise the decretal amount through a mortgage, lease or private sale of the property. The court may grant a certificate and postpone the sale on such terms as it deems proper. Subsequent rules discuss requirements for deposits from purchasers, timelines for payment of purchase amounts, procedures for re-sales due to default, setting aside of sales, and issuance of certificates once a sale becomes absolute.
This file deals with the Section 60-64 of CPC,1908, which talks about the Attachment of property in execution proceedings.
I have tried to make it easier for the students to understand the concept.
In case of any query the undersigned can be reached by email, the address of which has been given in the third last slide.
Transfer of property” defined.— (Sec 5)
In the following sections “transfer of property” means an act by which a living person conveys property, in present or in future, to one or more other living persons, or to himself, or to himself and one or more other living persons; and “to transfer property” is to perform such act.In this section “living person” includes a company or association or body of individuals, whether incorporated or not, but nothing herein contained shall affect any law for the time being in force relating to transfer of property to or by companies, associations or bodies of individuals.
This file deals with the Section 60-64 of CPC,1908, which talks about the Attachment of property in execution proceedings.
I have tried to make it easier for the students to understand the concept.
In case of any query the undersigned can be reached by email, the address of which has been given in the third last slide.
Transfer of property” defined.— (Sec 5)
In the following sections “transfer of property” means an act by which a living person conveys property, in present or in future, to one or more other living persons, or to himself, or to himself and one or more other living persons; and “to transfer property” is to perform such act.In this section “living person” includes a company or association or body of individuals, whether incorporated or not, but nothing herein contained shall affect any law for the time being in force relating to transfer of property to or by companies, associations or bodies of individuals.
the present power point presentation deals with the subject transfer of property act section 41 which talks about ostensible ownership. The ppt will be very helpful in understanding the topic and covers the relevant case laws for the same in a summarized way in 8 slides.
The presentation TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 includes the object of the Act, property, transfer, nature of transfer, kinds of transfer, the difference between movable and immovable property etc.
Code of civil procedure 1908 reference, review, revisionDr. Vikas Khakare
This explains what is reference, review and revision. when and where it can be made. It also explains difference between reference, review and revision.
he Specific Relief Act, 1963 is an Act of the Parliament of India which provides remedies for persons whose civil or contractual rights have been violated. It replaced an earlier Act of 1877. The following kinds of remedies may be granted by a court under the provisions of the Specific Relief Act:
Recovery of possession of property
Specific performance of contracts
Rectification of instruments
Rescission of contracts
Cancellation of Instruments
Declaratory decrees
Injunction
this presentation explains important concepts/definitions of
PROPERTY, ITS KINDS, IMMOVABLE AND MOVABLE
PROPERTY, LAND, INSTRUMENT, ATTESTED,
REGISTERED, and ACTIONABLE CLAIMS
The ppt consists of meaning of the doctrine with example. A detailed understanding of the principle has been included along with many case laws. The essentials have been mentioned which will validate the act of parties.
This explains what are parties to a suit, who can be joined as party to suit. It explains joinder, misjoinder, nonjoinder of parties. How parties may be added or struck out.
the present power point presentation deals with the subject transfer of property act section 41 which talks about ostensible ownership. The ppt will be very helpful in understanding the topic and covers the relevant case laws for the same in a summarized way in 8 slides.
The presentation TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 includes the object of the Act, property, transfer, nature of transfer, kinds of transfer, the difference between movable and immovable property etc.
Code of civil procedure 1908 reference, review, revisionDr. Vikas Khakare
This explains what is reference, review and revision. when and where it can be made. It also explains difference between reference, review and revision.
he Specific Relief Act, 1963 is an Act of the Parliament of India which provides remedies for persons whose civil or contractual rights have been violated. It replaced an earlier Act of 1877. The following kinds of remedies may be granted by a court under the provisions of the Specific Relief Act:
Recovery of possession of property
Specific performance of contracts
Rectification of instruments
Rescission of contracts
Cancellation of Instruments
Declaratory decrees
Injunction
this presentation explains important concepts/definitions of
PROPERTY, ITS KINDS, IMMOVABLE AND MOVABLE
PROPERTY, LAND, INSTRUMENT, ATTESTED,
REGISTERED, and ACTIONABLE CLAIMS
The ppt consists of meaning of the doctrine with example. A detailed understanding of the principle has been included along with many case laws. The essentials have been mentioned which will validate the act of parties.
This explains what are parties to a suit, who can be joined as party to suit. It explains joinder, misjoinder, nonjoinder of parties. How parties may be added or struck out.
Execution and enforcement of judgment and order
Writ of seizure and sale
Stay of Execution
WRIT OF POSSESSION
WRIT OF DELIVERY
GENERAL RULES IN RESPECT OF WRIT OF EXECUTION
ENFORCEMENT OF MONEY JUDGEMENT
GARNISHEE PROCEEDINGS
CHARGING ORDERS TO STOP ORDER
APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER (O51)
JUDGMENT DEBTOR SUMMONS
COMMITAL
WRIT OF DISTRESS
SALE AGREEMENT FORMAT
FREE LEGAL AND ACCOUNTANT FORMATS
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGEMENTS AND ORDERS
Writ of seizure and sale
Stay of Execution
WRIT OF POSSESSION
WRIT OF DELIVERY
ENFORCEMENT OF MONEY JUDGEMENT
GARNISHEE PROCEEDINGS
CHARGING ORDERS TO STOP ORDER
APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER (O51)
JUDGMENT DEBTOR SUMMONS
WRIT OF DISTRESS
This file deals with the provisions given for Adjudication of claims and objections during execution of decree or orders under CPC. I have tried to make it as precise and clear as possible. Valuable inputs are welcome to help me improve the material.
I can be reached at - alisha.verma@jaipur.manipal.edu
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
2. Rule 82 of O.XXI says that
Sales of immovable property in execution of decrees
may be ordered by
any Court
other than a Court of Small Causes.
3. Where an order for the sale of immovable property has been made,
if the judgment-debtor can satisfy the Court
that there is reason to believe that the decretal amount may be raised
by the mortgage or lease or private sale
of such property, or some part thereof,
or of any other immovable property of the judgment-debtor,
the Court may, on his application,
postpone the sale of the property comprised in the order for sale
on such terms and for such period
as the court thinks proper, to enable the judgment debtor to raise the amount.
4. In such case the Court shall grant a certificate
to the judgment-debtor
authorizing him within a period to be mentioned therein,
to make the proposed mortgage, lease or sale.
Provided that all moneys payable under such mortgage, lease or
sale
shall be paid, not to the judgment-debtor, but it shall be paid in
the court
Provided also that not mortgage, lease or sale under this rule
shall become absolute until it has been confirmed by the Court.
5. Nothing in this rule shall be deemed to apply
to a sale of property
directed to be sold in
execution of a decree for sale
in enforcement of a mortgage of, or charge on, such property.
6. On every sale of immovable property
the person declared to be the purchaser
shall pay immediately after such declaration
a deposit of twenty-five per cent,
on the amount of his purchase-money
to the officer or other person conducting the sale,
and in default of such deposit, the property shall forthwith be re-sold.
Where the decree-holder is the purchaser
and is entitled to set-off the purchase-money under rule 72,
the Court may dispense with the requirements of this rule.
7. The full amount of purchase-money payable
shall be paid by the purchaser into Court
before the Court closes on the fifteenth day from the sale of the property
Provided, that, in calculating the amount to be so paid into Court,
the purchaser shall have the advantage of any set-off
to which he may be entitled under rule 72.
8. In default of payment
within the period mentioned in the last preceding rule,
the deposit may, if the Court thinks fit,
after defraying the expenses of the sale,
be forfeited to the Government,
and the property shall be re-sold,
and the defaulting purchaser shall forfeit all claim to the property
or to any part of the sum for which it may subsequently be sold.
9. Having examined the language of the relevant rules and the judicial decisions
bearing upon the subject we are of the opinion that the provisions of the rules
requiring the deposit of 25% of the purchase money immediately, on the person
being declared as a purchaser and the payment of the balance within 15 days of the
sale are mandatory and upon non-compliance with these provisions there is no sale
at all.
The rules do not contemplate that there can be any sale in favor of a
purchaser without depositing 25% of the purchase money in the first instance and
the balance within 15 days. When there is no sale within the contemplation of
these rules, there can be no question of material irregularity in the conduct of the
sale. Non payment of the price on the part of the defaulting purchaser renders the
sale proceedings as a complete nullity.
10. Notification on re-sale [R.87]
Every re-sale of immovable, property,
in default of payment of the purchase-
money within the period allowed for such
payment,
shall be made after the issue of fresh
proclamation
in the manner and for the period
hereinbefore prescribed for the sale. [
court has to follow every procedure it did
for fresh sale earlier]
Bid of co-sharer to have preference [R. 88]
Where the property sold is a share of
undivided immovable property
and two or more persons, or whom one is
a co-sharer,
respectively bid the same sum
for such property or for any lot,
the bid shall be deemed to be the bid of
the co-sharer.
Co-sharer has a right of pre-emption..
11. Where immovable property has been sold in execution of a degree,
any person claiming an interest in the property sold
at the time of the sale or at the time of making the application
or acting for or in the interest of such person
may apply to have the sale set aside
on his deposition in Court-
(a) for payment to the purchaser, a sum equal to 5% of the purchase-money, and
(b) for payment to the decree-holder, the amount specified in the proclamation of sale as that
for the recovery of which the sale was ordered, less any amount which may, since the date of
such proclamation of sale, have been received by the decree-holder.
12. Where a person applies under rule 90 ( on the ground of irregularity or
fraud ) to set aside the sale of his immovable property,
unless he withdraws his application(of rule 90 ),
he shall not be entitled to make or prosecute an application under this rule.
Nothing in this rule shall relieve the judgment-debtor
from any liability he may be under in respect of costs and interest
not covered by the proclamation of sale
13. (1) Where any immovable property has been sold in execution of a decree,
the decree-holder, or the purchaser, or
any other person entitled to share in a ratable distribution of assets, or
whose interests are affected by the sale,
may apply to the Court to set aside the sale
on the ground of a material irregularity or fraud in publishing or conduction it.
(2) No sale shall be set aside on the ground of irregularity or fraud in publishing or conducting it
unless, upon the facts proved,
the Court is satisfied that the applicant has sustained substantial injury
by reason of such irregularity or fraud.
(3) No application to set aside a sale under this rule shall be entertained upon any ground
which the applicant could have taken on or before
the date on which the proclamation of sale was drawn up.
Explanation.—There mere absence of, or defect in, attachment of the property sold shall not, by
itself, be a ground for setting aside a sale under this rule.
14. Application by purchaser to set aside sale on ground of judgment-
debtor having no saleable interest [R.91]
The purchaser at any such sale in execution of a decree
may apply to the Court to set aside the sale,
on the ground that the judgment-debtor had no saleable interest in the property sold.
15. (1) When no application is made under rule 89, rule 90 or rule 91(application to set aside the sale
on the grounds mentioned in earlier slides), OR
where such application is made and disallowed,
the Court shall make an order confirming the sale, and thereupon the sale shall become
absolute
Provided that, where any property is sold in execution of a decree
pending the final disposal of any claim to, or any objection
to the attachment of, such property,
the Court shall not confirm such sale until the final disposal of such claim or objection.
16. Where such application is made and allowed,
and where, in the case of an application under rule 89 (application to set side on
deposit)
the deposit required by that rule is made within 60 days from the date of sale, OR
in cases where the amount deposited under rule 89 is found to be deficient
owing to any clerical or arithmetical mistake on the part of the depositor and
such deficiency has been made good within such time as may be fixed by the Court,
the Court shall make an order setting aside the sale
Provided that no order shall be made unless notice of the application has been given
to all persons affected thereby.
17. (3) No suit to set aside an order made under this rule shall be brought by any person against
whom such order is made.
(4) Where a third party challenges the judgment-debtor's title by filing a suit against the auction-
purchaser, the decree-holder and the judgment-debtor shall be necessary parties to the suit.
(5) If the suit referred to in sub-rule (4) is decreed,
The Court shall direct the decree-holder to refund the money to the auction-purchaser, and
where such an order is passed the execution proceeding
in which the sale had been held shall,
unless the Court directs, be revived at the stage at which the sale was ordered.
18. Where a sale of immovable property is set aside under rule 92,
the purchaser shall be entitled to an order
for repayment of his purchase-money,
with or without interest as the Court may direct,
against any person to whom it has been paid.
19. Where a sale of immovable property has become absolute,
the Court shall grant a certificate
specifying the property sold
and the name of the person
who at the time of sale of is declared to be the purchaser.
Such certificate shall bear date the day on which the sale became absolute.