Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
•
0 likes•6 views
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 34-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample taken on September 13, 2021 tested negative. The report provides information on the test methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes that test results should be considered in the full clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
A molecular biology report for a patient named Fathimath Shamna summarizes that a SARS-CoV-2 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on September 13, 2021 and reported on September 14, 2021. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 16-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and symptoms. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methodology at an ICMR-registered laboratory to qualitatively detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 21-year-old female patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be used along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and notes that a single negative test does not exclude infection and repeat sampling may be needed.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology used.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 40-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes that the negative result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation and does not rule out infection.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named C K Wasiq showed a SARS-CoV-2 test result that was negative. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The report provides information on coronavirus, the test interpretation for positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 21-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations of positive and negative results. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 57-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the negative test result.
Recommended
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
A molecular biology report for a patient named Fathimath Shamna summarizes that a SARS-CoV-2 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on September 13, 2021 and reported on September 14, 2021. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 16-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and symptoms. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methodology at an ICMR-registered laboratory to qualitatively detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 21-year-old female patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be used along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and notes that a single negative test does not exclude infection and repeat sampling may be needed.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology used.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 40-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes that the negative result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation and does not rule out infection.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named C K Wasiq showed a SARS-CoV-2 test result that was negative. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The report provides information on coronavirus, the test interpretation for positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 21-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations of positive and negative results. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 57-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the negative test result.
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a 23-year-old female patient using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on August 9th and the results were reported on September 9th. The test result was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Hamna Musthafa showed that a SARS-CoV-2 test of their nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was negative. The test used real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus. A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen but does not completely rule out infection, and the result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that testing was based on a request from state surveillance programs.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Saifudeen K H, a 26 year old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and notes that negative results require correlation with clinical findings.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the test method used, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient tested for COVID-19. The test was for Mohammed Shabeer T M, a 28-year-old male. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative based on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The report provides information on coronavirus, the test methodology, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 26-year-old male patient to detect SARS-CoV-2. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not present in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the RT-PCR test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the test results.
Rtpcr
A real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The test is intended to qualitatively detect SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, in upper and lower respiratory specimens. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens and interpreting positive and negative test results in the context of a patient's clinical presentation and exposure history.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using real time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) and found to be negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's condition.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Haidar Ali P A and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Mohammed Lisan Ali and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr 210930041407
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Fathima Afreen, a 21-year old female patient, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the result should be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical history and presentation, as a false negative is possible due to improper sample collection, transport, or handling. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr 210930041407
A laboratory report for a patient named Sameena describes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was reported as SARS-CoV-2 negative. Additional information provided includes details on specimen collection and testing methodology, the pathogen being tested for, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 60-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) returned a negative result. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Mohammed Valeed showed a negative result for SARS-CoV-2 detection from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report explained that coronaviruses can cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in the given sample but does not completely rule out infection. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 26-year-old male patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative test results, and notes that repeat sampling may be needed for accurate results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in the given sample but does not completely rule out infection. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 26-year-old male patient named Mohammed Thamees. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 28/09/2021 and reported on 29/09/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample using real-time polymerase chain reaction testing. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 48-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and symptoms. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methodology at an ICMR-approved laboratory to qualitatively detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
More Related Content
What's hot
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a 23-year-old female patient using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on August 9th and the results were reported on September 9th. The test result was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Hamna Musthafa showed that a SARS-CoV-2 test of their nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was negative. The test used real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus. A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen but does not completely rule out infection, and the result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that testing was based on a request from state surveillance programs.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Saifudeen K H, a 26 year old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and notes that negative results require correlation with clinical findings.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the test method used, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient tested for COVID-19. The test was for Mohammed Shabeer T M, a 28-year-old male. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative based on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The report provides information on coronavirus, the test methodology, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 26-year-old male patient to detect SARS-CoV-2. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not present in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the RT-PCR test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the test results.
Rtpcr
A real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The test is intended to qualitatively detect SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, in upper and lower respiratory specimens. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens and interpreting positive and negative test results in the context of a patient's clinical presentation and exposure history.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using real time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) and found to be negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's condition.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Haidar Ali P A and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Mohammed Lisan Ali and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr 210930041407
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Fathima Afreen, a 21-year old female patient, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the result should be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical history and presentation, as a false negative is possible due to improper sample collection, transport, or handling. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr 210930041407
A laboratory report for a patient named Sameena describes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was reported as SARS-CoV-2 negative. Additional information provided includes details on specimen collection and testing methodology, the pathogen being tested for, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 60-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) returned a negative result. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Mohammed Valeed showed a negative result for SARS-CoV-2 detection from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report explained that coronaviruses can cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in the given sample but does not completely rule out infection. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 26-year-old male patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative test results, and notes that repeat sampling may be needed for accurate results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in the given sample but does not completely rule out infection. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 26-year-old male patient named Mohammed Thamees. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 28/09/2021 and reported on 29/09/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample using real-time polymerase chain reaction testing. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
What's hot (20)
Similar to Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 48-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result indicates that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and symptoms. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methodology at an ICMR-approved laboratory to qualitatively detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 21-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. Real-time PCR was used to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The test was intended to detect the virus that causes COVID-19 in respiratory tract samples.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 21-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 21-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 20-year-old female patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on August 10, 2021 and the report was issued on September 10, 2021. The test result was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used. It emphasizes that test results should be considered in the clinical context of the patient.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Thamam Shuhshad summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test results for a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen were negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens and interpreting positive and negative test results.
Rtpcr 210906183229
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes that the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of COVID-19 testing done on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology used. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838 copy
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Moideen Mahfoos E M, a 27-year-old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838 copy
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 21-year old female patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 53-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology used, and interpretations for positive and negative test results which should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 47-year-old female patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative test does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
A molecular biology report for a patient named Fathima Afreen summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was SARS-COV2 negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen. However, the report notes that a negative test result does not rule out infection completely and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology used. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 21-year-old male patient named Mohammed Valeed. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on March 10, 2021. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Similar to Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838 (18)
More from Care Reference Laboratory
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was SARS-CoV-2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Certificate
This certificate confirms Saniya Bi Shaikh received two doses of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine. She received her first dose on August 3, 2021 from batch 4121Z088 and her second dose on October 30, 2021 from batch 4121Z105 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and contains contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Certificate
This certificate confirms that Saniya Bi Shaikh, an 18-year-old female, received the first dose of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine on July 3, 2021 and the second dose on September 30, 2021 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and lists contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a patient named Jawad Rahees. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was authored by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR and was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample collected on April 2, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test result for the patient identified as Mohammed Rameez M was negative. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be interpreted in the clinical context. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 04/02/2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, testing method used, implications of positive and negative results, and notes that the results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient Mohammed Ishak B A. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test performed on April 2, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 24-year-old female patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, as the test has limitations. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the negative results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report for a patient named Nidhi Subash shows the results of a COVID-19 test. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample collected from Mohammed Rafeeq Marathanadi. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR test. The test result was positive, indicating the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A positive result suggests a diagnosis of COVID-19, though the result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and exposure risks. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a sample from Ashthaf Ali C. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR analysis. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 56-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on January 24, 2022 and reported on January 24, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the patient, test method, pathogen details, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on result correlation with clinical findings. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/12/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method used, the coronavirus tested for, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test. The test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient C K Wasiq was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The report provides background on corona viruses, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Recently uploaded
How to choose the best dermatologists in Indore.
The skin is the largest organ and its health plays a vital role among the other sense organs. The skin concerns like acne breakout, psoriasis, or anything similar along the lines, finding a qualified and experienced dermatologist becomes paramount.
Top Travel Vaccinations in Manchester
Travel vaccination in Manchester offers comprehensive immunization services for individuals planning international trips. Expert healthcare providers administer vaccines tailored to your destination, ensuring you stay protected against various diseases. Conveniently located clinics and flexible appointment options make it easy to get the necessary shots before your journey. Stay healthy and travel with confidence by getting vaccinated in Manchester. Visit us: www.nxhealthcare.co.uk
Artificial Intelligence Symposium (THAIS)
Artificial Intelligence Symposium (THAIS). Parc Taulí. Sabadell
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
une 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotes
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Know the difference between Endodontics and Orthodontics.
Your smile is beautiful.
Let’s be honest. Maintaining that beautiful smile is not an easy task. It is more than brushing and flossing. Sometimes, you might encounter dental issues that need special dental care. These issues can range anywhere from misalignment of the jaw to pain in the root of teeth.
Pollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdf
Pollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdfChulalongkorn Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group
Pollen and Fungal allergy
Presented by Chaloemchai Chumsaengchotsakul, MD.
June 14, 2024Cosmetology and Trichology Courses at Kosmoderma Academy PRP (Hair), DR Growt...
Cosmetology and Trichology Courses at Kosmoderma Academy PRP (Hair), DR Growt...Kosmoderma Academy Of Aesthetic Medicine
Kosmoderma Academy, a leading institution in the field of dermatology and aesthetics, offers comprehensive courses in cosmetology and trichology. Our specialized courses on PRP (Hair), DR+Growth Factor, GFC, and Qr678 are designed to equip practitioners with advanced skills and knowledge to excel in hair restoration and growth treatments.
Breast cancer: Post menopausal endocrine therapy
Breast cancer in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) status is a common and complex condition that necessitates a multifaceted approach to management. HR+ breast cancer means that the cancer cells grow in response to hormones such as estrogen and progesterone. This subtype is prevalent among postmenopausal women and typically exhibits a more indolent course compared to other forms of breast cancer, which allows for a variety of treatment options.
Diagnosis and Staging
The diagnosis of HR+ breast cancer begins with clinical evaluation, imaging, and biopsy. Imaging modalities such as mammography, ultrasound, and MRI help in assessing the extent of the disease. Histopathological examination and immunohistochemical staining of the biopsy sample confirm the diagnosis and hormone receptor status by identifying the presence of estrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) on the tumor cells.
Staging involves determining the size of the tumor (T), the involvement of regional lymph nodes (N), and the presence of distant metastasis (M). The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system is commonly used. Accurate staging is critical as it guides treatment decisions.
Treatment Options
Endocrine Therapy
Endocrine therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for HR+ breast cancer in postmenopausal women. The primary goal is to reduce the levels of estrogen or block its effects on cancer cells. Commonly used agents include:
Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs): Tamoxifen is a SERM that binds to estrogen receptors, blocking estrogen from stimulating breast cancer cells. It is effective but may have side effects such as increased risk of endometrial cancer and thromboembolic events.
Aromatase Inhibitors (AIs): These drugs, including anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane, lower estrogen levels by inhibiting the aromatase enzyme, which converts androgens to estrogen in peripheral tissues. AIs are generally preferred in postmenopausal women due to their efficacy and safety profile compared to tamoxifen.
Selective Estrogen Receptor Downregulators (SERDs): Fulvestrant is a SERD that degrades estrogen receptors and is used in cases where resistance to other endocrine therapies develops.
Combination Therapies
Combining endocrine therapy with other treatments enhances efficacy. Examples include:
Endocrine Therapy with CDK4/6 Inhibitors: Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib are CDK4/6 inhibitors that, when combined with endocrine therapy, significantly improve progression-free survival in advanced HR+ breast cancer.
Endocrine Therapy with mTOR Inhibitors: Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, can be added to endocrine therapy for patients who have developed resistance to aromatase inhibitors.
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy is generally reserved for patients with high-risk features, such as large tumor size, high-grade histology, or extensive lymph node involvement. Regimens often include anthracyclines and taxanes.
Osteoporosis - Definition , Evaluation and Management .pdf
Osteoporosis is an increasing cause of morbidity among the elderly.
In this document , a brief outline of osteoporosis is given , including the risk factors of osteoporosis fractures , the indications for testing bone mineral density and the management of osteoporosis
Acute Gout Care & Urate Lowering Therapy .pdf
In this document , the management of acute gout attacks and a description of urate lowering therapy is mentioned.
Demystifying Fallopian Tube Blockage- Grading the Differences and Implication...
Fallopian tube blockage may cause female infertility. For treatment, herbal medicine Fuyan Pill can be a solution.
vonoprazan A novel drug for GERD presentation
Vonoprazan, a new potassium acid channel blocker used in the conditions of GERD and gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer ....
10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations
The benefits of an ePCR solution should extend to the whole EMS organization, not just certain groups of people or certain departments. It should provide more than just a form for entering and a database for storing information. It should also include a workflow of how information is communicated, used and stored across the entire organization.
What are the different types of Dental implants.
Are you looking for a long-lasting solution to your missing tooth?
Dental implants are the most common type of method for replacing the missing tooth. Unlike dentures or bridges, implants are surgically placed in the jawbone. In layman’s terms, a dental implant is similar to the natural root of the tooth. It offers a stable foundation for the artificial tooth giving it the look, feel, and function similar to the natural tooth.
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/Pt1nA32sdHQ
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/uFdc9F0rlP0
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
Recently uploaded (20)
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotes
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotes
Know the difference between Endodontics and Orthodontics.
Know the difference between Endodontics and Orthodontics.
Cosmetology and Trichology Courses at Kosmoderma Academy PRP (Hair), DR Growt...
Cosmetology and Trichology Courses at Kosmoderma Academy PRP (Hair), DR Growt...
Osteoporosis - Definition , Evaluation and Management .pdf
Osteoporosis - Definition , Evaluation and Management .pdf
Demystifying Fallopian Tube Blockage- Grading the Differences and Implication...
Demystifying Fallopian Tube Blockage- Grading the Differences and Implication...
10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations
10 Benefits an EPCR Software should Bring to EMS Organizations
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
- 1. LABORATORY REPORT : P135655 : 13/09/2021 4:16 PM : 13/09/2021 4:21 PM : 14/09/2021 7:28 PM : Patient ID Registered On Collected On Reported On External Id : Ashtaf Ali : V134256 : 34 Y / M Name Visit No Age/Gender Ref By : Kalarikkal X ray, Ramanattukara MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORT Test Name : COVID 19 SARS CoV 2 Detection by Qualitative Real Time PCR ICMR Registration Number: CARREFLABVKK SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction TEST RESULT SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE Specimen Type : Method : Nasopharyngeal/Oropharyngeal swab RTPCR This Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction test intended to use for the qualitative detection of a novel corona virus which was identified in 2019 at Wuhan City, Hubei province, China in upper respiratory tract specimens and lower respiratory tract specimens of infected people. Pathogen information : Corona viruses (CoV) are a large family of viruses that cause illness ranging from common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS -CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV). SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a new strain that has not been previously identified in humans. Interpretation : A "POSITIVE" result indicates that Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is present in the given sample and suggests the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Test result should always be considered in the context of patient's clinical history, physical examination, and epidemiologic exposures. A "NEGATIVE" result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 is not present in the patient's given specimen. Result should be correlated with patient’s history and clinical presentation. However it does not rule out the infection completely and should not be used as the sole basis for making decisions related to treatment and other patient management decisions. A false negative may resulted due to inadequate number of organisms are present in the specimen due to improper collection, transport or handling Note: The results relate only to the specimens tested and should be correlated with clinical findings Interpretation guidance: 1. Testing of referred clinical specimens was considered on the basis of request/referral received from/ through state surveillance officer(SSO) of concerned State Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme / any other health care facility affirming requirements of the case definition/s 2.A single negative test result, particularly if this is from an upper respiratory tract specimen, does not exclude infection 3.A positive test result is only tentative, and will be reconfirmed by retesting. 4.Repeat sampling and testing of lower respiratory specimen is strongly recommended in severe or progressive disease. The repeat specimens may be considered after a gap of 2-4 days after the collection of the first specimen for additional testing if required 5.A positive alternate pathogen does not necessarily rule out either, as little is yet known about the role of coinfections *** End of Report *** Page 1 of 1 Dr. Ronald A Roche MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist Printed On : 08/09/2021 20:41 Dr. Reshmi Gopalakrishnan MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist