This document summarizes and contrasts past and present approaches to long-term strategic planning for space. It discusses the visions of early space futurists like Wernher von Braun, Arthur C. Clarke, Dandridge Cole, Herman Kahn, and Gerard O'Neill from the 1950s-1970s who advocated ambitious plans to explore and develop space over decades. However, it notes that long-term strategic planning for space has suffered since then from a lack of substance and relevance to decision-makers. The document calls for reviving and reconfiguring space futurism to emphasize its continuing importance.
This paper introduces the the context for geodesign, the history of geodesign, the definition of geodesign, the importance of geodesign, the nature of design, managing complexity, the technology of digital geodesign, and creating the future.
Humans to Mars: Logical Step or Dangerous Distraction?James Vedda
This paper examines post-Apollo proposals for human exploration of Mars and assesses
their failure to win enduring political and public support. There are lessons to be learned
that are applicable to current exploration efforts. Foremost among these is that the path to
solar system exploration that has dominated the space community’s thinking since the 1950s
may not be a logical or politically feasible approach for the 21st century. The paper proposes
that human exploration of the Moon and Mars should be decoupled and treated as separate
ventures with each justified by its own merits and pursued at its own pace.
An Alternative Approach to National Space PolicyJames Vedda
The administration of President Barack Obama has revised U.S. National Space Policy in a process somewhat shorter and more streamlined than previous administrations. However, even this modified approach consumes substantial time and resources while yielding, at best, incremental improvements. This paper suggests a different way to configure the nation’s top-level space policies, with particular emphasis on creation of a new policy that combines space exploration and development, and better articulates long-term goals and strategies for the nation’s civil space efforts.
CEWAC - applied research in welding, material testing and industrial hydrauli...frehendrickx
CEWAC is a Belgian service centre to the industry performing studies and applied research, founded in 1989.
We are located close to the borders with the Netherlands, Germany, Luxemburg and France.
Our two main divisions are:
a) assembly and material testing
b) hydraulics and hydromechanics
more info on:
www.cewac.be
This paper introduces the the context for geodesign, the history of geodesign, the definition of geodesign, the importance of geodesign, the nature of design, managing complexity, the technology of digital geodesign, and creating the future.
Humans to Mars: Logical Step or Dangerous Distraction?James Vedda
This paper examines post-Apollo proposals for human exploration of Mars and assesses
their failure to win enduring political and public support. There are lessons to be learned
that are applicable to current exploration efforts. Foremost among these is that the path to
solar system exploration that has dominated the space community’s thinking since the 1950s
may not be a logical or politically feasible approach for the 21st century. The paper proposes
that human exploration of the Moon and Mars should be decoupled and treated as separate
ventures with each justified by its own merits and pursued at its own pace.
An Alternative Approach to National Space PolicyJames Vedda
The administration of President Barack Obama has revised U.S. National Space Policy in a process somewhat shorter and more streamlined than previous administrations. However, even this modified approach consumes substantial time and resources while yielding, at best, incremental improvements. This paper suggests a different way to configure the nation’s top-level space policies, with particular emphasis on creation of a new policy that combines space exploration and development, and better articulates long-term goals and strategies for the nation’s civil space efforts.
CEWAC - applied research in welding, material testing and industrial hydrauli...frehendrickx
CEWAC is a Belgian service centre to the industry performing studies and applied research, founded in 1989.
We are located close to the borders with the Netherlands, Germany, Luxemburg and France.
Our two main divisions are:
a) assembly and material testing
b) hydraulics and hydromechanics
more info on:
www.cewac.be
Workshop Module for Salesman in Retail Salesman for enhancing their customer service and sales productivity...
Developed by Mavericks Learning & Development, Hyderabad.
For Training Contact # 9949375512
This document was prepared by Adam Mitchell, Limco Development, CEO based on the current perception of the Company’s business and prospects. It was not prepared specifically as an offering document and does not contain risk factors or other risk disclosure language typically found in offering documents. It is for discussion purpose only.
The Future of Humanity Nick Bostrom Future of Humanit.docxbarbaran11
The Future of Humanity
Nick Bostrom
Future of Humanity Institute
Faculty of Philosophy & James Martin 21st Century School
Oxford University
www.nickbostrom.com
[Complete draft circulated (2007)]
[Published in New Waves in Philosophy of Technology, eds. Jan-Kyrre Berg Olsen, Evan
Selinger, & Soren Riis (New York: Palgrave McMillan, 2009)]
[Reprinted in the journal Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, forthcoming]
Abstract
The future of humanity is often viewed as a topic for idle speculation. Yet our beliefs and
assumptions on this subject matter shape decisions in both our personal lives and public
policy – decisions that have very real and sometimes unfortunate consequences. It is
therefore practically important to try to develop a realistic mode of futuristic thought about
big picture questions for humanity. This paper sketches an overview of some recent attempts
in this direction, and it offers a brief discussion of four families of scenarios for humanity’s
future: extinction, recurrent collapse, plateau, and posthumanity.
The future of humanity as an inescapable topic
In one sense, the future of humanity comprises everything that will ever happen to any
human being, including what you will have for breakfast next Thursday and all the scientific
discoveries that will be made next year. In that sense, it is hardly reasonable to think of the
future of humanity as a topic: it is too big and too diverse to be addressed as a whole in a
single essay, monograph, or even 100-volume book series. It is made into a topic by way of
abstraction. We abstract from details and short-term fluctuations and developments that
affect only some limited aspect of our lives. A discussion about the future of humanity is
about how the important fundamental features of the human condition may change or remain
constant in the long run.
What features of the human condition are fundamental and important? On this there
can be reasonable disagreement. Nonetheless, some features qualify by almost any standard.
For example, whether and when Earth-originating life will go extinct, whether it will
colonize the galaxy, whether human biology will be fundamentally transformed to make us
posthuman, whether machine intelligence will surpass biological intelligence, whether
1
http://www.nickbostrom.com/
population size will explode, and whether quality of life will radically improve or deteriorate:
these are all important fundamental questions about the future of humanity. Less
fundamental questions – for instance, about methodologies or specific technology projections
– are also relevant insofar as they inform our views about more fundamental parameters.
Traditionally, the future of humanity has been a topic for theology. All the major
religions have teachings about the ultimate destiny of humanity or the end of the world.1
Eschatological themes have also been explored by big-name philosopher.
Making Weather Connections: From Science to Common Sense, and Public Lethargy...Barry Wellar
Weather-related issues are of increasing public interest but much more effort is needed to close the gap between the perception of weather as science and of weather as common sense. In 2006 the Canadian Association of Geographers played a lead role in international Geography Awareness Week (GAW) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Day. A key theme for 2007 is to demonstrate to Canadians throughout the country how geography affects the formation of weather systems; how weather systems are affected by geography; and how geography and weather systems combine to affect transportation systems, emergency services, water quality, energy supplies and consumption, public safety, garbage disposal, economic activity - even the quality of air that we breathe.
This presentation explores how meteorologists and oceanographers can join forces with geographers to turn aspects of our sciences into common sense concepts, and thereby accelerate the process of converting public lethargy about the weather and our shared climate into public and political activism.
PAD 502 Organization DynamicsReadings Themes Class Discussion.docxgerardkortney
PAD 502: Organization Dynamics
Readings Themes Class Discussion Worksheet
What are three of the most important points that weave through the readings for the past week, and what is it that makes them significant?
1.
2.
3.
What is least clear or most puzzling from the material you have read for this week? In other words, what left you with the most questions, and what are they? Be prepared to lead the class in a discussion.
Application: How might you apply the materials to inform and improve your surroundings? Be specific.
in programs in whicb the U.S, is dominant. The United States
could find itself isolated from major trends in space develop-
ment and have to spend its own funds to obtain capabilities
and data previously available through cooperative projects.
Most of all, the world is entering a new period of space activ-
ity, in which socially and economically beneftcia! applications
of space technology receive increased emphasis in parallel
with the traditional priority given to science and exploration,
it is not a time for the United States to withdraw from the
opportunities and responsibilities that will accompany the
space developtnents of the coming decades. And there is
much in the U.S, record of international cooperation that has
been quite successful; despite recent problems, the United
States remains the partner of choice for most other countries.
Leading through cooperation should remain an important part
of the U.S, approach to space (Logsdon, 1988).
The conservative, almost nostalgic, message of the
Advisory Committee on the Future of the U,S. Space Program
with respect to international relationships in space stands in
rather stark contrast to the optimistic conclusions of the last
advisory committee that examined this topic in some depth, A
1987 report of a Task Force on International Relations in
Space of the NASA Advisory Council concluded that
International cooperation, a feature of the civil
space program from its outset, has served the for-
eign policy, scientific and space programmatic
interests of the United States very well. It has
given substance to U.S. leadership, l'he climate,
character, and circumstances for cooperation
have changed dramatically in recent years with
the changing environment of international rela-
tions in space. However, cooperation will be
even more itnportant in the future although likely
to change in character (NASA Advisory Council,
1987, p, 41),
By giving scant attention to the role of international coop-
eration (and international competition, by the way) in shap-
ing the U.S. civilian space program of the next decade and
beyond, the Comtnittee missed an important dimension of
contemporary space policy. Given the pressures under which
it was operating and the depth and scope of the problems
internal to the U.S, program, the omission may be under-
standable. But more needs to be said on these issues as the
United States rebuilds a space program for the 21st century,
• • •
.
This presentation was given as part of the Cross-Domain Deterrence Seminar hosted by the Center for Global Security Research at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in November 2014.
≫ Environmental Science: Ecology Free Essay Sample on Samploon.com. Ecology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words. Ecology Essay. Ecology is Good Business Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays .... 180 Environmental Research Topics & Questions to Write about. Environment Essay | Economics - Year 12 HSC | Thinkswap. Ecology essay ghostwriter site. Environment essay. An Introduction To Ecology And The Biosphere Free Essay Example. ecology-essay-questions - Eco. Essay about environmental studies. (PDF) Principles of Ecology Revisited: Integrating Information and .... A Nature Essay | Natural Environment | Environmental Degradation. » How to Write an Essay on Zero-Waste Approach for the Ecology Class. Writing an Ecology Essay? Here Are Effective Tips & a Full Guide .... Deep Ecology Essay | Environmental Ethics | Ecology. Environment Essay Guided Discovery | Environmentalism | Natural Environment. Essay on Environment | Ecology | Pollution. Essays UK | Sustainability | Ecology. Topics for Ecology Essays. Environmental essay - inhisstepsmo.web.fc2.com.
Sujay Reducing Latency time in science FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL.pdfSujay Rao Mandavilli
There is often an inordinate time span from the time a new idea is gestated till it is widely accepted in
scientific and in popular circles, with wide variations commonly observed across geographies and
disciplines. This elapsed time may be referred to as the ‘latency period’ for the acceptance, or even a
structured and a justified rejection, as the case may be, of new or novel ideas. This can be observed in
most societies around the world, unfortunately even in more advanced ones. There is also a variation
across geographies to the detriment of developing countries, and across disciplines to the detriment of
various fields in the social sciences. Indeed, we have analyzed the possible root causes of all these in our
paper, and all these must be systematically addressed, and new or other root causes identified. This would
form a part of what some experts consider a “time crashing” technique. Reducing this latency period will
lead to scientific progress at a much higher rate, or “Scientific progress at the speed of light” as we would
like to call it. There are many ways to do this. The first would be to improve the education system on the
principles we had laid out in our published paper on “Anthropological Pedagogy” and the “Sociology of
science”. The second would be to build a robust twenty-first century intellectualism involving the negation
of all ideologies which should greatly serve to set the house in order; we have deliberated, and written at
length about all these in earlier times. This latency period we believe can be greatly brought down if
science becomes a much more global activity, and the ideas and ideals of the “Globalization of science”
movement that we have been championing all along are accomplished. Thus, we would effectively be
killing two birds with one stone.
Abstract:- There is often an inordinate time span from the
time a new idea is gestated till it is widely accepted in
scientific and in popular circles, with wide variations
commonly observed across geographies and disciplines.
This elapsed time may be referred to as the ‘latency
period’ for the acceptance, or even a structured and a
justified rejection, as the case may be, of new or novel
ideas. This can be observed in most societies around the
world, unfortunately even in more advanced ones. There is
also a variation across geographies to the detriment of
developing countries, and across disciplines to the
detriment of various fields in the social sciences. Indeed,
we have analyzed the possible root causes of all these in
our paper, and all these must be systematically addressed,
and new or other root causes identified. This would form a
part of what some experts consider a “time crashing”
technique. Reducing this latency period will lead to
scientific progress at a much higher rate, or “Scientific
progress at the speed of light” as we would like to call it.
There are many ways to do this. The first would be to
improve the education system on the principles we had laid
out in our published paper on “Anthropological
Pedagogy” and the “Sociology of science”. The second
would be to build a robust twenty-first century
intellectualism involving the negation of all ideologies
which should greatly serve to set the house in order; we
have deliberated, and written at length about all these in
earlier times. This latency period we believe can be greatly
brought down if science becomes a much more global
activity, and the ideas and ideals of the “Globalization of
science” movement that we have been championing all
along are accomplished. Thus, we would effectively be
killing two birds with one stone.
Workshop Module for Salesman in Retail Salesman for enhancing their customer service and sales productivity...
Developed by Mavericks Learning & Development, Hyderabad.
For Training Contact # 9949375512
This document was prepared by Adam Mitchell, Limco Development, CEO based on the current perception of the Company’s business and prospects. It was not prepared specifically as an offering document and does not contain risk factors or other risk disclosure language typically found in offering documents. It is for discussion purpose only.
The Future of Humanity Nick Bostrom Future of Humanit.docxbarbaran11
The Future of Humanity
Nick Bostrom
Future of Humanity Institute
Faculty of Philosophy & James Martin 21st Century School
Oxford University
www.nickbostrom.com
[Complete draft circulated (2007)]
[Published in New Waves in Philosophy of Technology, eds. Jan-Kyrre Berg Olsen, Evan
Selinger, & Soren Riis (New York: Palgrave McMillan, 2009)]
[Reprinted in the journal Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, forthcoming]
Abstract
The future of humanity is often viewed as a topic for idle speculation. Yet our beliefs and
assumptions on this subject matter shape decisions in both our personal lives and public
policy – decisions that have very real and sometimes unfortunate consequences. It is
therefore practically important to try to develop a realistic mode of futuristic thought about
big picture questions for humanity. This paper sketches an overview of some recent attempts
in this direction, and it offers a brief discussion of four families of scenarios for humanity’s
future: extinction, recurrent collapse, plateau, and posthumanity.
The future of humanity as an inescapable topic
In one sense, the future of humanity comprises everything that will ever happen to any
human being, including what you will have for breakfast next Thursday and all the scientific
discoveries that will be made next year. In that sense, it is hardly reasonable to think of the
future of humanity as a topic: it is too big and too diverse to be addressed as a whole in a
single essay, monograph, or even 100-volume book series. It is made into a topic by way of
abstraction. We abstract from details and short-term fluctuations and developments that
affect only some limited aspect of our lives. A discussion about the future of humanity is
about how the important fundamental features of the human condition may change or remain
constant in the long run.
What features of the human condition are fundamental and important? On this there
can be reasonable disagreement. Nonetheless, some features qualify by almost any standard.
For example, whether and when Earth-originating life will go extinct, whether it will
colonize the galaxy, whether human biology will be fundamentally transformed to make us
posthuman, whether machine intelligence will surpass biological intelligence, whether
1
http://www.nickbostrom.com/
population size will explode, and whether quality of life will radically improve or deteriorate:
these are all important fundamental questions about the future of humanity. Less
fundamental questions – for instance, about methodologies or specific technology projections
– are also relevant insofar as they inform our views about more fundamental parameters.
Traditionally, the future of humanity has been a topic for theology. All the major
religions have teachings about the ultimate destiny of humanity or the end of the world.1
Eschatological themes have also been explored by big-name philosopher.
Making Weather Connections: From Science to Common Sense, and Public Lethargy...Barry Wellar
Weather-related issues are of increasing public interest but much more effort is needed to close the gap between the perception of weather as science and of weather as common sense. In 2006 the Canadian Association of Geographers played a lead role in international Geography Awareness Week (GAW) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Day. A key theme for 2007 is to demonstrate to Canadians throughout the country how geography affects the formation of weather systems; how weather systems are affected by geography; and how geography and weather systems combine to affect transportation systems, emergency services, water quality, energy supplies and consumption, public safety, garbage disposal, economic activity - even the quality of air that we breathe.
This presentation explores how meteorologists and oceanographers can join forces with geographers to turn aspects of our sciences into common sense concepts, and thereby accelerate the process of converting public lethargy about the weather and our shared climate into public and political activism.
PAD 502 Organization DynamicsReadings Themes Class Discussion.docxgerardkortney
PAD 502: Organization Dynamics
Readings Themes Class Discussion Worksheet
What are three of the most important points that weave through the readings for the past week, and what is it that makes them significant?
1.
2.
3.
What is least clear or most puzzling from the material you have read for this week? In other words, what left you with the most questions, and what are they? Be prepared to lead the class in a discussion.
Application: How might you apply the materials to inform and improve your surroundings? Be specific.
in programs in whicb the U.S, is dominant. The United States
could find itself isolated from major trends in space develop-
ment and have to spend its own funds to obtain capabilities
and data previously available through cooperative projects.
Most of all, the world is entering a new period of space activ-
ity, in which socially and economically beneftcia! applications
of space technology receive increased emphasis in parallel
with the traditional priority given to science and exploration,
it is not a time for the United States to withdraw from the
opportunities and responsibilities that will accompany the
space developtnents of the coming decades. And there is
much in the U.S, record of international cooperation that has
been quite successful; despite recent problems, the United
States remains the partner of choice for most other countries.
Leading through cooperation should remain an important part
of the U.S, approach to space (Logsdon, 1988).
The conservative, almost nostalgic, message of the
Advisory Committee on the Future of the U,S. Space Program
with respect to international relationships in space stands in
rather stark contrast to the optimistic conclusions of the last
advisory committee that examined this topic in some depth, A
1987 report of a Task Force on International Relations in
Space of the NASA Advisory Council concluded that
International cooperation, a feature of the civil
space program from its outset, has served the for-
eign policy, scientific and space programmatic
interests of the United States very well. It has
given substance to U.S. leadership, l'he climate,
character, and circumstances for cooperation
have changed dramatically in recent years with
the changing environment of international rela-
tions in space. However, cooperation will be
even more itnportant in the future although likely
to change in character (NASA Advisory Council,
1987, p, 41),
By giving scant attention to the role of international coop-
eration (and international competition, by the way) in shap-
ing the U.S. civilian space program of the next decade and
beyond, the Comtnittee missed an important dimension of
contemporary space policy. Given the pressures under which
it was operating and the depth and scope of the problems
internal to the U.S, program, the omission may be under-
standable. But more needs to be said on these issues as the
United States rebuilds a space program for the 21st century,
• • •
.
This presentation was given as part of the Cross-Domain Deterrence Seminar hosted by the Center for Global Security Research at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in November 2014.
≫ Environmental Science: Ecology Free Essay Sample on Samploon.com. Ecology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words. Ecology Essay. Ecology is Good Business Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays .... 180 Environmental Research Topics & Questions to Write about. Environment Essay | Economics - Year 12 HSC | Thinkswap. Ecology essay ghostwriter site. Environment essay. An Introduction To Ecology And The Biosphere Free Essay Example. ecology-essay-questions - Eco. Essay about environmental studies. (PDF) Principles of Ecology Revisited: Integrating Information and .... A Nature Essay | Natural Environment | Environmental Degradation. » How to Write an Essay on Zero-Waste Approach for the Ecology Class. Writing an Ecology Essay? Here Are Effective Tips & a Full Guide .... Deep Ecology Essay | Environmental Ethics | Ecology. Environment Essay Guided Discovery | Environmentalism | Natural Environment. Essay on Environment | Ecology | Pollution. Essays UK | Sustainability | Ecology. Topics for Ecology Essays. Environmental essay - inhisstepsmo.web.fc2.com.
Sujay Reducing Latency time in science FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL.pdfSujay Rao Mandavilli
There is often an inordinate time span from the time a new idea is gestated till it is widely accepted in
scientific and in popular circles, with wide variations commonly observed across geographies and
disciplines. This elapsed time may be referred to as the ‘latency period’ for the acceptance, or even a
structured and a justified rejection, as the case may be, of new or novel ideas. This can be observed in
most societies around the world, unfortunately even in more advanced ones. There is also a variation
across geographies to the detriment of developing countries, and across disciplines to the detriment of
various fields in the social sciences. Indeed, we have analyzed the possible root causes of all these in our
paper, and all these must be systematically addressed, and new or other root causes identified. This would
form a part of what some experts consider a “time crashing” technique. Reducing this latency period will
lead to scientific progress at a much higher rate, or “Scientific progress at the speed of light” as we would
like to call it. There are many ways to do this. The first would be to improve the education system on the
principles we had laid out in our published paper on “Anthropological Pedagogy” and the “Sociology of
science”. The second would be to build a robust twenty-first century intellectualism involving the negation
of all ideologies which should greatly serve to set the house in order; we have deliberated, and written at
length about all these in earlier times. This latency period we believe can be greatly brought down if
science becomes a much more global activity, and the ideas and ideals of the “Globalization of science”
movement that we have been championing all along are accomplished. Thus, we would effectively be
killing two birds with one stone.
Abstract:- There is often an inordinate time span from the
time a new idea is gestated till it is widely accepted in
scientific and in popular circles, with wide variations
commonly observed across geographies and disciplines.
This elapsed time may be referred to as the ‘latency
period’ for the acceptance, or even a structured and a
justified rejection, as the case may be, of new or novel
ideas. This can be observed in most societies around the
world, unfortunately even in more advanced ones. There is
also a variation across geographies to the detriment of
developing countries, and across disciplines to the
detriment of various fields in the social sciences. Indeed,
we have analyzed the possible root causes of all these in
our paper, and all these must be systematically addressed,
and new or other root causes identified. This would form a
part of what some experts consider a “time crashing”
technique. Reducing this latency period will lead to
scientific progress at a much higher rate, or “Scientific
progress at the speed of light” as we would like to call it.
There are many ways to do this. The first would be to
improve the education system on the principles we had laid
out in our published paper on “Anthropological
Pedagogy” and the “Sociology of science”. The second
would be to build a robust twenty-first century
intellectualism involving the negation of all ideologies
which should greatly serve to set the house in order; we
have deliberated, and written at length about all these in
earlier times. This latency period we believe can be greatly
brought down if science becomes a much more global
activity, and the ideas and ideals of the “Globalization of
science” movement that we have been championing all
along are accomplished. Thus, we would effectively be
killing two birds with one stone.
Graham, Stephen, and Patsy Healey. "Relational concepts of space and place: i...Stephen Graham
This paper seeks to conceptualise and explore the changing relationships between planning action and practice and the dynamics of place. It argues that planning practice is grappling with new treatments of place, based on dynamic, relational constructs, rather than the Euclidean, deterministic, and one-dimensional treatments inherited from the 'scientific' approaches of the 1960s and early 1970s. But such emerging planning practices remain poorly served by planning theory which has so far failed to produce sufficiently robust and sophisticated conceptual treatments of place in today's 'globalising' world. In this paper we attempt to draw on a wide range of recent advances in social theory to begin constructing such a treatment. The paper has four parts. First, we criticise the legacy of object-oriented, Euclidean concepts of planning theory and practice, and their reliance on 'containered' views of space and time. Second, we construct a relational understanding of time, space and cities by drawing together four strands of recent social theory. These are : relational theories of urban time-space, dynamic conceptualisations of 'multiplex' places and cities, the 'new' urban and regional socio-economics, and emerging theories of social agency and institutional ordering. In the third section, we apply such perspectives to three worlds of planning practice : land use regulation, policy frameworks and development plans, and the development of 'customised spaces' in urban 'regeneration'. Finally, by way of conclusion, we suggest some pointers for practising planning in a relational way.
Geography and the Media: Strengthening the RelationshipBarry Wellar
Invited symposium paper discusses how geographers can be more successful in having their work receive the attention of the media, and how the media can better inform geographers about interacting with the media, and how the media can better use geographic materials in media stories.
Welocme to ViralQR, your best QR code generator.ViralQR
Welcome to ViralQR, your best QR code generator available on the market!
At ViralQR, we design static and dynamic QR codes. Our mission is to make business operations easier and customer engagement more powerful through the use of QR technology. Be it a small-scale business or a huge enterprise, our easy-to-use platform provides multiple choices that can be tailored according to your company's branding and marketing strategies.
Our Vision
We are here to make the process of creating QR codes easy and smooth, thus enhancing customer interaction and making business more fluid. We very strongly believe in the ability of QR codes to change the world for businesses in their interaction with customers and are set on making that technology accessible and usable far and wide.
Our Achievements
Ever since its inception, we have successfully served many clients by offering QR codes in their marketing, service delivery, and collection of feedback across various industries. Our platform has been recognized for its ease of use and amazing features, which helped a business to make QR codes.
Our Services
At ViralQR, here is a comprehensive suite of services that caters to your very needs:
Static QR Codes: Create free static QR codes. These QR codes are able to store significant information such as URLs, vCards, plain text, emails and SMS, Wi-Fi credentials, and Bitcoin addresses.
Dynamic QR codes: These also have all the advanced features but are subscription-based. They can directly link to PDF files, images, micro-landing pages, social accounts, review forms, business pages, and applications. In addition, they can be branded with CTAs, frames, patterns, colors, and logos to enhance your branding.
Pricing and Packages
Additionally, there is a 14-day free offer to ViralQR, which is an exceptional opportunity for new users to take a feel of this platform. One can easily subscribe from there and experience the full dynamic of using QR codes. The subscription plans are not only meant for business; they are priced very flexibly so that literally every business could afford to benefit from our service.
Why choose us?
ViralQR will provide services for marketing, advertising, catering, retail, and the like. The QR codes can be posted on fliers, packaging, merchandise, and banners, as well as to substitute for cash and cards in a restaurant or coffee shop. With QR codes integrated into your business, improve customer engagement and streamline operations.
Comprehensive Analytics
Subscribers of ViralQR receive detailed analytics and tracking tools in light of having a view of the core values of QR code performance. Our analytics dashboard shows aggregate views and unique views, as well as detailed information about each impression, including time, device, browser, and estimated location by city and country.
So, thank you for choosing ViralQR; we have an offer of nothing but the best in terms of QR code services to meet business diversity!
A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...sonjaschweigert1
Rapid and secure feature delivery is a goal across every application team and every branch of the DoD. The Navy’s DevSecOps platform, Party Barge, has achieved:
- Reduction in onboarding time from 5 weeks to 1 day
- Improved developer experience and productivity through actionable findings and reduction of false positives
- Maintenance of superior security standards and inherent policy enforcement with Authorization to Operate (ATO)
Development teams can ship efficiently and ensure applications are cyber ready for Navy Authorizing Officials (AOs). In this webinar, Sigma Defense and Anchore will give attendees a look behind the scenes and demo secure pipeline automation and security artifacts that speed up application ATO and time to production.
We will cover:
- How to remove silos in DevSecOps
- How to build efficient development pipeline roles and component templates
- How to deliver security artifacts that matter for ATO’s (SBOMs, vulnerability reports, and policy evidence)
- How to streamline operations with automated policy checks on container images
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionAggregage
Join Maher Hanafi, VP of Engineering at Betterworks, in this new session where he'll share a practical framework to transform Gen AI prototypes into impactful products! He'll delve into the complexities of data collection and management, model selection and optimization, and ensuring security, scalability, and responsible use.
Elevating Tactical DDD Patterns Through Object CalisthenicsDorra BARTAGUIZ
After immersing yourself in the blue book and its red counterpart, attending DDD-focused conferences, and applying tactical patterns, you're left with a crucial question: How do I ensure my design is effective? Tactical patterns within Domain-Driven Design (DDD) serve as guiding principles for creating clear and manageable domain models. However, achieving success with these patterns requires additional guidance. Interestingly, we've observed that a set of constraints initially designed for training purposes remarkably aligns with effective pattern implementation, offering a more ‘mechanical’ approach. Let's explore together how Object Calisthenics can elevate the design of your tactical DDD patterns, offering concrete help for those venturing into DDD for the first time!
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
Le nuove frontiere dell'AI nell'RPA con UiPath Autopilot™UiPathCommunity
In questo evento online gratuito, organizzato dalla Community Italiana di UiPath, potrai esplorare le nuove funzionalità di Autopilot, il tool che integra l'Intelligenza Artificiale nei processi di sviluppo e utilizzo delle Automazioni.
📕 Vedremo insieme alcuni esempi dell'utilizzo di Autopilot in diversi tool della Suite UiPath:
Autopilot per Studio Web
Autopilot per Studio
Autopilot per Apps
Clipboard AI
GenAI applicata alla Document Understanding
👨🏫👨💻 Speakers:
Stefano Negro, UiPath MVPx3, RPA Tech Lead @ BSP Consultant
Flavio Martinelli, UiPath MVP 2023, Technical Account Manager @UiPath
Andrei Tasca, RPA Solutions Team Lead @NTT Data
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
SAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdfPeter Spielvogel
Building better applications for business users with SAP Fiori.
• What is SAP Fiori and why it matters to you
• How a better user experience drives measurable business benefits
• How to get started with SAP Fiori today
• How SAP Fiori elements accelerates application development
• How SAP Build Code includes SAP Fiori tools and other generative artificial intelligence capabilities
• How SAP Fiori paves the way for using AI in SAP apps
2. actions taken today can target – or avoid – particular outcomes that may be decades away. In short, “the goal of
futuring is not to predict the future, but to make it better.” 3
A Golden Age of Space Futurism began in the early 1950s and lasted for about three decades. This is not to
imply that there were no space visionaries prior to the 1950s. In fact, there were many: Konstantin Tsiolkovsky,
Hermann Oberth, Robert Goddard, and Herman (Potočnik) Noordung, to name a few. But as mid-century passed,
there was a perceptible change in the way policy-makers and the public thought about space. In political science
terms, this was a shift in “policy image.” Spaceflight ceased to be merely science fiction and became something that
could actually happen within one’s own lifetime. This was a profound attitude adjustment, stimulated by
technological advances and media attention, that turned space into a serious public policy concern that was in need
of long-term visions.
Before analyzing why this Golden Age ended and why the public policy community has failed to compensate
for this deficit, it is instructive to briefly review the visions of some of the key thinkers of the period.
A. Wernher von Braun
Fascination with space goes back a long way, but it really began to capture widespread attention in the early
1950s as post-World War II economic and technological growth provided the means to pursue space activities in the
not-too-distant future. Technically grounded, well-thought-out plans for the conquest of space appeared at this time,
the most popular of which came from Wernher von Braun and a team of prominent advocates. Widely publicized in
print media 4 and on television, 5 the steps in the plan were as follows:
1. Launch and operate Earth-orbiting satellites to learn about the technology and the space environment.
2. Conduct Earth-orbiting flights with human crews to learn how to live and work in space.
3. Develop reusable spacecraft to shuttle back and forth to low Earth orbit.
4. Build permanently inhabited space stations to observe Earth and serve as a launching point to other
destinations in space.
5. Explore and settle the Moon.
6. Explore and settle Mars. 6
To a very substantial extent, this plan has guided U.S. human spaceflight efforts since the beginning of the
space age. The Moon race of the 1960s shuffled the order of events, but strategic planning since the end of Apollo
has focused on getting back on the Von Braun track. NASA has adhered to this plan and presidential administrations
have adopted it as their own. Clearly, no other space exploration and development paradigm has been as influential
in public policy.
B. Arthur C. Clarke
The prolific author Arthur C. Clarke is perhaps best known for two things: his 1945 journal article describing an
architecture for communications relays in geostationary orbit, 7 and his collaboration with Stanley Kubrick for the
movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. These constitute a small sample of a large body of work – dozens of books and
hundreds of essays – that secured Clarke’s place as a world-renowned futurist. A pragmatist as well as a visionary,
Clarke avoided violating the known laws of physics even when writing fiction set in the distant future. His futurist
writing is highlighted here using two prominent examples of his non-fiction work.
In 1963, Clarke collected essays he had written during the previous five years and published them under the title
Profiles of the Future. He covered a variety of topics, such as terrestrial and space transportation, energy production,
manufacturing, the potential of the human brain, artificial intelligence, and the difficulties of time travel and
invisibility. His most remarkable prognostications were those regarding telecommunications. In an essay written
prior to the 1962 launch of Telstar, he accurately depicted direct-to-home satellite television, portable phones with
position location capabilities, and fax machines. He also provided a prescient description of the Internet. The daily
newspaper, he prophesied, would show up on your TV screen, and would allow you to print out just the articles you
wished to read. Further, the same TV screen could give you access to an electronic library of books and documents. 8
Clarke’s clairvoyance did not extend to all areas, however. In the back of the book he placed a “Chart of the
Future,” which he advised readers not to take too seriously. This is good advice, since the chart predicts nuclear
rockets in the 1970s, planetary expeditions in the 1980s, artificial intelligence and fusion power in the 1990s,
planetary colonization in the 2000s, weather control in the 2010s, and interstellar probes in the 2020s.
A few years later, in 1968, Clarke produced one of his most memorable non-fiction works, The Promise of
Space. This is undoubtedly one of the best tutorials ever written for the general reader on rocketry, orbital
mechanics, and the solar system. Exercising his predictive powers, Clarke wrote of reusable boosters and aerospace
planes, and finished with a discussion of the challenges of traveling to the stars. Although his aim in this book was
not to predict when certain capabilities would arrive, Clarke exhibited his optimism when he said, “the exploitation
2
3. of the foreseeable techniques to their limit could result in truly commercial space transport being in sight by the end
of this century. And perhaps fifty years from now [i.e., 2018], anyone should be able to afford a visit to the Moon at
least once in his lifetime.” 9
C. Dandridge Cole
An aerospace engineer who was also trained in chemistry, physics, and medicine, Dandridge Cole wrote books,
articles, and technical papers that provoked much thought in the late 1950s and early 1960s about possibilities for
space development. Cole was an “out-of-the-box” thinker, perhaps best remembered for his 1964 book (co-written
with science writer Donald Cox) advocating robotic and human journeys to the planetoids (a term he preferred over
“asteroids”) as the next major space endeavor after the Moon. He envisioned the human spaceflight program as
follows:
Phase 1 – The Exploration of the Earth’s Space Environs (1961-1965)
Phase 2 – The Exploration of the Moon and Its Environs (1965-1975)
Phase 3 – The Exploration and Exploitation of the Planetoids and Martian Moons (1975-1985)
Phase 4 – The Exploration of Mars and Other Solar System Planets (1980-2000) 10
Cole felt that NASA’s thinking at the time represented a go-slow policy. Postponing manned Mars flights to
sometime in the 1980s, he believed, would concede the initiation of interplanetary flights to the Russians. 11
In a 1965 book, Cole acknowledged that the space program at that time was mainly designed to gain
technological advantage and win the allegiance of nations in a global power struggle. But from a long-term
perspective, he believed that “We could fill books with problems of fundamental importance to the human race
which can be solved only by spaceflight, more easily by spaceflight, or more probably by spaceflight.” 12
Cole discussed several emerging developments and took the position that “All of these major breakthroughs are
connected in some way with the conquest of space!” 13 He believed spaceflight would stimulate technological
breakthroughs toward revolutionary, rather than just evolutionary, advances. He had in mind a diverse mix of
research and development areas including energy production (especially nuclear), automation, artificial intelligence,
scientific discoveries on the formation of the universe and the basic structure of matter, the improvement of the
human species through genetic and mechanical means, and world government. All of these advances he expected “in
the next fifty years” – in other words, by about 2015. We have made great strides in many of these areas, but we are
still far from the levels Cole anticipated.
Cole excited readers with his optimism. Here are some of the key assumptions he made about what would
happen within 50 years (and a parenthetical reality check):
• Many advanced space vehicles based on new forms of propulsion will be built. (Actually, we are still using
the same basic chemical rocket concept that has been used since the beginning of spaceflight.)
• Space transport costs will drop by an order of magnitude every seven years for the next two decades.
(Much to the chagrin of everyone in the space business, this has not occurred.)
• Nuclear fission power should be available at much lower prices unless something much better such as
fusion power has replaced it. (Obviously, this hasn’t happened either.)
• On the question of whether the inner solar system will be colonized during this time period, “the tentative
conclusion must be – yes.” (The actual conclusion must be – no.)
• Extraterrestrial bases and colonies will become self-sustaining. (Such bases and colonies remain
conspicuously absent.)
Like many of his contemporaries, Cole assumed a pace of development that was far too ambitious. As was the
case with Clarke, he was not proposing anything that would defy the known laws of physics, nor was he probing
into scientific and technical areas that lacked at least some theoretical or practical background. His work reflects the
fact that he was a product of his environment, which at that time made it look like revolutionary developments were
just as likely, or even more likely, than evolutionary ones.
D. Herman Kahn
Well known for work on nuclear conflict scenarios at RAND Corporation, Herman Kahn and his colleagues
started the Hudson Institute, a futurist think-tank, in 1961. 14 The Institute’s interests have always been wide-ranging,
and through the 1960s and 70s included space development. Kahn’s popular 1967 book The Year 2000 (co-written
with Anthony Wiener) offered a list of 100 “very likely” technical innovations anticipated for the turn of the 21st
century, including these space-related items:
• Direct broadcasts from satellites to home receivers
• Worldwide use of high-altitude cameras for mapping, prospecting, census, land use, and geology
• Recoverable boosters for economic space launching
3
4. • Space defense systems
• Artificial moons and other methods for lighting large areas at night
• Permanent manned satellite and lunar installations; interplanetary travel 15
The first two items appeared ahead of schedule. The next two items were partially addressed by 2000 but still
remain in very early stages of development. The last two items are still beyond the horizon, although one could
debate whether the International Space Station is what Kahn meant by “permanent manned satellite.” Most likely, he
envisioned something busier and more permanent, as did many of his contemporaries.
The book also offered a list of 25 “less likely” possibilities, some of which involved space:
• Major use of rockets for commercial or private transportation (either terrestrial or extraterrestrial)
• Substantial manned lunar or planetary installations
• Planetary engineering
• Modification of the solar system 16
Commercial payload launch services became common well before 2000, and commercial human spaceflight may
become reality in the near future. However, the other three items on this list are still far down the road. One wonders
exactly what Kahn had in mind for “modification of the solar system.”
Kahn and his Hudson Institute colleagues produced a 1976 book titled The Next 200 Years focused on what they
called an “Earth-centered” perspective on global development, which assumed limited levels of space exploration
and exploitation. However, the authors also introduced a “space-bound” perspective, which would involve
… a much more vigorous effort in extraterrestrial activities early in the 21st century, including the eventual
establishment of large autonomous colonies in space involved in the processing of raw materials, the
production of energy and the manufacture of durable goods – both for indigenous consumption and as exports
back to earth or to other solar-system colonies. Such developments would involve substantial migration from
earth and could eventually create very new and different patterns of population and product growth, all quite
beyond any projections made from a basically earth-centered perspective. 17
Kahn and the Hudson Institute, at least during this period, clearly viewed space development as a logical and
all-but-inevitable step in societal evolution.
E. Gerard K. O’Neill
Almost as if he was picking up where Kahn’s 1976 book left off, Gerard K. O’Neill published The High
Frontier in the same year, outlining how humanity should begin using the vast resources of space. 18 He believed
that the human condition on Earth would be improved by the work of a large population residing in space colonies.
Extraterrestrial energy and material resources would enable economic growth and prosperity – both on Earth and on
the space colonies – while preserving Earth’s environment. Contrary to what some have alleged, O’Neill’s vision
was not intended as a resettlement plan to remedy overpopulation, or as a way for the affluent to escape the planet’s
problems. His ideas were spawned by a search for solutions to societal needs as much as by his interest in the
scientific and engineering challenges of space settlement.
O’Neill shunned predictions of a firm schedule for realizing his concept, but believed a “high-orbital facility”
could begin within seven to 10 years and be completed in 15 to 25 years. From our perspective today – several years
past his 25-year estimate – it is doubtful that even another quarter century will be sufficient to construct the first
iteration of O’Neill’s vision.
In his 1981 book 2081, O’Neill allowed himself to delve more deeply into the art of prophecy, taking a 100-
year view shaped by five drivers of change: computers, automation, communications, energy, and – the factor that
sets O’Neill’s view apart from many others – space colonies. He speculated that by 2081, “there may be more
Americans in space colonies than there are in the United States” and “a voyage of a few days to a space colony will
be as commonplace in 2081 as a Caribbean cruise is to us today.” This would be enabled, according to the findings
of technical workshops reported in the book, because “a rapidly growing industry in space could be established with
a total investment comparable to that made in the Alaska Pipeline (which was entirely privately financed) in a time
of less than ten years from the start of a substantial development effort.” Once such a commitment was made, there
would be “a near certainty of economic payback beginning within five years after investment.” 19
Some have labeled O’Neill’s vision as utopian or escapist, but its prophetic inaccuracies stem from overly
ambitious timelines rather than the disconnect from reality that these labels imply. O’Neill was well aware of
political and economic bottlenecks, but placed too much faith in the ability of technological progress to overcome
them. Nonetheless, he conveyed a compelling message about how space could contribute to serving global societal
needs, and in the process he has inspired a substantial number of space professionals and enthusiasts in the
generations that have followed.
4
5. F. Prophets or Dreamers? Learning Lessons from Early Space Futurists
Knowing how far we have fallen behind the expectations of these and other futurists, we might conclude that
space futurism has had a dismal record of guiding policy (with the notable exception of the Von Braun paradigm).
Even if the majority of these technological and societal propositions had been embraced, one might expect that the
resulting policies would have vastly underperformed on their objectives for a variety of reasons. Does this mean that
space futurism is little better than fantasy, and should not be relied upon to advise public policy?
Before jumping to that conclusion, two important points should be considered. First, space futurists did get
some things right, and sometimes even underestimated our eventual accomplishments. Futurists helped to inspire
efforts to develop geosynchronous communications satellites and to go to the Moon, both of which were major
advances that were realized more quickly than even most futurists had imagined. Second, much of what they got
wrong was a result of overestimating the pace, rather than the substance, of technological developments. Their poor
track record in this area stands out because some of the biggest activities – lunar bases, Mars missions, space mining
and manufacturing – have missed (or will miss) their predicted appearance not just by a few years, but by a few
decades. Part of this is because some ventures turned out to be technically harder than originally assumed; obvious
examples include development of fusion systems for power and propulsion, and human trips to Mars. But the
greatest culprit in the extension of timelines has been the non-technical factors – political, economic, and societal.
The classic space visionaries typically ignored, downplayed, misinterpreted, or misrepresented these factors so they
could keep the focus on technical advancement. Arthur C. Clarke was up-front about this in his book Profiles of the
Future:
I am limiting myself to a single aspect of the future – its technology, not the society that will be based upon
it… I also believe – and hope – that politics and economics will cease to be as important in the future as they
have been in the past… Politics and economics are concerned with power and wealth, neither of which
should be the primary, still less the exclusive, concern of full-grown men. 20
Purposeful avoidance or inappropriate application of a multidisciplinary approach that includes socio-economic
realities is evident in the work of the other futurists. In the examples presented earlier, O’Neill and Cole
demonstrated more savvy in this area than many of their contemporaries, though they tended to downplay or
misread political signals that challenged the inevitability of technological advances. Kahn, in contrast to the others
discussed here, actively sought to integrate socio-economic factors, but did so in ways that often seemed contrived
to support his conclusions – a methodology that today would be called “spin.”
An axiom of futurism is that there is a tendency to overestimate the near term and underestimate the long term.
Near-term overestimation is a particular problem for space futurists, whose subject matter is by nature very long
term, and whose audience includes policy-makers, business people, and others who are looking for information
about the immediate future and are seeking results in a few years at most.
Positive visions often take on a grand scale, and space visions are extreme examples of this characteristic. The
Golden Age of Space Futurism ended by the early 1980s largely due to reality overtaking ambition. The same
realities that ended the Apollo program – changing public policy priorities, budget deficits, a sagging economy,
reduced confidence in government programs and technological advances – similarly constricted space futurism after
a time lag of a few years. By this time, awe-inspiring space developments occurring in one’s own lifetime, which
seemed to have become a new requirement of space efforts, could no longer be envisioned. The quick results of the
Apollo program are at least partly to blame for this, leading observers to believe that this should be the norm.
Clearly, if space futurism is to reemerge and play a constructive role in public policy, expectations of instant
gratification need to be quelled, and futurists’ methodology must incorporate sincere efforts to integrate social
science considerations and thereby increase the perceived relevance and value of the resulting visions. Before
examining how to approach this, let’s briefly recall how we got to where we are.
III. Where Have the Visionaries Gone?
A. The Onset of Pessimism
Advances in space applications and human spaceflight in the 1960s made it logical for optimists to portray
space as an important part of humanity’s future, and to expect that the rapid development of space technology would
continue. But the seeds of pessimism were already being sown in the U.S. by several influential developments. The
escalation of the Vietnam War and racial tensions spawned protests and violent civil unrest, resulting in falling
public confidence in the federal government’s competence. At the same time, there was increasing awareness of
environmental problems after Rachel Carson’s 1962 book Silent Spring. 21 Certainly, this was not the first time that a
society raised concerns over war, ethnic conflict, or environmental degradation. The significance for the space age,
however, is that although the space program was at its most popular and was producing historic achievements, many
5
6. in the 1960s began to see technology as part of the problem rather than part of the solution. Combined with the
troubled economy of the 1970s, this contributed to the sharp downturn in the priority and pace of space
development.
Space futurism remained prominent in the 1970s, with young people and professionals riding the momentum of
Apollo-era accomplishments and generating remarkable futurist scenarios like O’Neill’s space settlement concept
noted above. The decade-long slump in activity and public interest, particularly in human spaceflight, seemed like a
cyclical slowdown that would turn around dramatically once NASA’s space shuttle became operational in the 1980s.
But at the same time there began an outpouring of cautionary literature that continues today.22 Discussions of
societal and global problems of increasing magnitude made spaceflight look less relevant. Inflated perceptions of the
cost of the space program caused some to see it as a drain on resources that would be better spent elsewhere. Too
few saw that space applications could be valuable tools in the search for solutions.
The 1980s brought new possibilities for space, but also a great deal of hype. The space shuttle system failed to
live up to its promises of cheap, frequent access to orbit, and then failed catastrophically in the 1986 Challenger
accident. Commercial space efforts – primarily launch services, remote sensing, and microgravity materials
processing – didn’t quickly produce profitable multi-billion-dollar industries as promised, and in fact are still
struggling today. The Apollo generation was having trouble convincing the next generation that a career in the space
community would be interesting, lucrative, and professionally fulfilling.
The end of the Cold War at the beginning of the 1990s shut down the already sagging superpower rivalry in
space, removing the last vestiges of what had once been the civil space program’s greatest driver. NASA spent the
rest of the decade as the nation’s poster child for Reinventing Government (i.e., downsizing) and adopted the mantra
of “faster, better, cheaper.” Even if this had worked as advertised, it was little more than an acquisition philosophy –
not the long-term strategic vision for the future in space that was needed and is still lacking.
During these post-Apollo decades, the search for a vision continued sporadically, but without success.
B. Two Generations of Failed Visions
It is well known that NASA was unable to stimulate interest in ambitious space exploration and development
plans in the wake of Apollo. NASA’s dreams of new launch vehicles, space stations, lunar outposts, and missions to
Mars, largely derived from the Von Braun model and earnestly proposed in 1969, 23 were either significantly
watered down or rejected 24 but would periodically reappear before policy-makers in the U.S. government.
In 1985-86, the National Commission on Space, headed by Thomas Paine – a former NASA Administrator and
advocate of Mars exploration – was directed by Congress to construct a U.S. civil space strategy for the next 50
years (i.e., through 2035). In addition to advocating missions to the Moon and Mars, the Commission’s mid-1986
report 25 outlined major steps in infrastructure development and recommended concurrent efforts in the civil and
commercial sectors. Unfortunately, for a variety of reasons, there was almost no follow-up from the Ronald Reagan
administration. (One reason was bad timing – the Commission’s report came out at around the same time as the
Rogers Commission report on the Challenger accident.) The administration’s disappointing response to this effort
was one paragraph in a 1988 space policy directive which referred to human exploration beyond Earth orbit without
mentioning the Moon or Mars. The directive recognized that there should be a “long-range goal of expanding human
presence and activity beyond Earth orbit into the solar system,” but it put off any serious commitment by simply
directing NASA to “begin the systematic development of technologies necessary to enable and support a range of
future manned missions.” Such development would be “oriented toward a Presidential decision on a focused
program of manned exploration of the solar system.” 26
Despite failing to generate political and funding support during the Reagan administration, a similar Von Braun-
inspired human exploration plan appeared a short time later in the form of President George H.W. Bush’s Space
Exploration Initiative (SEI). President Bush used his speech at a ceremony honoring the twentieth anniversary of
Apollo 11 to announce SEI, which featured a return to the Moon and a human expedition to Mars by early in the 21st
century. 27 He backed it up with sizable requests for start-up funding, and allowed Vice President Dan Quayle and
the National Space Council to devote the bulk of their efforts to promoting the concept. The idea was poorly
received in Congress, which granted only token appropriations for preliminary studies. Even that meager funding
dried up by 1993. 28
The most recent space exploration plan, revealed by President George W. Bush in January 2004, is intended to
“Extend human presence across the solar system, starting with a human return to the Moon by the year 2020, in
preparation for human exploration of Mars and other destinations.” 29 Like the previous efforts, this is another
attempt to resurrect the half-century-old Von Braun paradigm, and it shares the same key deficiency: no strategically
significant long-term rationale has been articulated. 30 So far, it has received enough funding to get started, but
6
7. significantly less than what was originally promised. As funding requirements peak in the next decade, it remains to
be seen whether the program will be sustainable as currently configured. 31
C. Evidence of Declining Interest
From the 1950s to the 1970s, most futurists acknowledged the importance of space exploration and
development. Since that time, however, space has fallen off the radar screen of mainstream futurists. For example,
there is no space category among the World Future Society’s “20 Subject Categories of Futures Thinking,” and the
Society’s list of 140 “best books and reports” includes only one space-related item: an illustrated book that
speculates on what extra-solar planets might look like. 32
RAND Corporation, the pioneer think tank on space and other technologies, also puts out a recommended
reading list called “50 Books for Thinking About the Future Human Condition.” 33 However, no space-related books
are on this list. RAND has branched out substantially since the 1970s and now does work in 17 major categories.
Space-related studies have become a very small subset of the Science & Technology category as customer interests
and the mix of corporate expertise have moved into other areas. 34
Declining or non-existent interest in space is evident among other non-profits and SETAs (systems engineering
and technical assistance contractors), aside from those staking out positions on space weapons and related national
security issues. The author experienced this first hand during more than six years at Analytic Services Inc.
(ANSER), which at one time was a significant player in supporting national security and civil space agencies in
Washington, DC. ANSER lost interest in space-related business and sought greener pastures in homeland security
after former shuttle astronaut John Fabian retired as the company’s CEO in October 1998.
A notable exception to this trend is the recent activity at a think tank that traditionally has not been associated
with space. The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), established in 1962 to study challenges to
national and global security, has made space a prominent subject since 2003 when the organization began its Human
Space Exploration Initiative to examine the global implications of humanity’s movement into space. 35 The impact of
the CSIS effort remains to be seen.
IV. The Future of Space Futurism
To steer correctly, a system with inherent momentum needs to be looking ahead at least as far as
its momentum can carry it. The longer it takes a boat to turn, the farther ahead its radar must
see. 36
The quote above is particularly appropriate when considering the future of space exploration and development,
not only because it is “a system with inherent momentum” but also due to the extremely long lead-times –
sometimes measured in decades – between conceptualization of a space system and its full operational capability.
Unfortunately, we have not found a balance between the overly ambitious forecasts of the Golden Age of Space
Futurism and the limited, pragmatic, and decidedly unsuccessful approach to space strategy since that time. A
general observation in a recent RAND study is particularly true for space planning: “… most futuristic narratives are
created with the aim of commenting on and shaping the present rather than supplying an accurate roadmap for what
is to come.” 37
A. Needed: A Multidisciplinary Approach
At this point we should revisit a quote from Dandridge Cole noted earlier: “We could fill books with problems
of fundamental importance to the human race which can be solved only by spaceflight, more easily by spaceflight,
or more probably by spaceflight.” Cole did not finish the job of filling the books that he alluded to, though he might
have done so, had he not died of a heart attack at the age of 44. The task remains for us to complete.
If space futurism is to provide policy guidance for addressing “problems of fundamental importance to the
human race,” it must be far more than a technologist’s dream factory. Collectively, we must open the aperture wider
than even the most erudite visionaries of the Golden Age and seek to encompass the highest-salience challenges of
our era. There are plenty of topics to be covered, going well beyond the disciplines typically associated with space
science and engineering, such as artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, robotics, and the production and distribution
of energy. But “multidisciplinary” does not simply mean multiple types of engineering. Political, economic, and
other societal developments must be considered in parallel, including topics such as these:
• Geopolitics and international relations
o Population growth, migration, and demographic changes
o The role of emerging economic and technological powers such as China and India
7
8. o Evolving relationships, including research and development partnerships, with long-time allies
• Globalization, both economic and technological
o Technology transfer – incoming as well as outgoing
o International fiscal and monetary concerns
o Trade relations, especially in technical areas like telecommunications and energy
• Global threats
o Natural and man-made disasters
o Military conflict
o Climate change
o Environmental degradation
o Resource scarcity
o Pandemics
Political, economic, and environmental goals and objectives must be linked to the nation’s space efforts, which
can then be programmed to seek long-term solutions to global problems. Increased activity in space applications and
Earth sciences, backed up by a wider public and private sector constituency, will bring greater stability in the
allocation of resources and will once again attract the brightest and most energetic minds to space-related fields. It
also will redound to the benefit of space exploration ambitions, since exploration and development are two sides of
the same coin.
This brings us back to the purpose of futurism: not to predict the future, but to make it better. Multidisciplinary
investigation of plausible options to address the needs of probable future scenarios will be an important tool to avoid
the unrealized expectations and wasted resources that have been endemic to space efforts since Apollo.
B. Building Recognition of the Relevance of Space
Space was the cutting-edge, fast-moving activity of the 1960s, but today it is viewed in the U.S. as one of the
slower-paced sectors of high technology, surpassed in speed and agility by information technology, biomedical
advances, and other disciplines. This perception, fed by widely reported problems in controlling costs, meeting
schedules, maintaining quality, and retaining global market share, evokes images of a community that has lost its
edge and its relevance. This is occurring at a time when the geopolitical and economic environment – which directly
affects the health, missions, and priorities of the space community – is evolving rapidly. In order for the space
community to remain relevant, it must be vigilant of societal and technical trends, not only in space-related fields
but in other key areas that directly and indirectly affect its work. A sustained effort is required to integrate these
trends and formulate scenarios extending well into the future.
There is evidence of increasing recognition of the need for more and better futures studies to assist in long-term
strategic planning or contingency planning for disruptive technologies or events. For example, Mike McConnell,
Director of National Intelligence, recently noted:
The intelligence community is also investing in more in-depth and long-range analysis so that analysts can
dig deeper into issues of concern for the future, such as the changing character of warfare and energy
38
security, unencumbered by the demands of producing current intelligence.
During the past few years, the author has observed increasing interest among colleagues and government
officials in the monitoring and analysis of the many diverse trends shaping the future. Generally, queries take a form
such as, “What can I expect my operating environment to be like in 2025?” An appropriate and helpful response
must do more than say, in effect, “It will be much like today but with better technology.” Such a study must take on
the fascinating and challenging tasks of trend-spotting, long-range speculation, and scenario generation in civil,
commercial, and national security space, which require insight into history and the policy environment as well as
technical expertise.
Astute analysts in the space community, able to assimilate key aspects of our multifaceted operating
environment, should contribute to defining the role of space in our future, lest the task be left to other organizations
that are less space-savvy – or to no one at all. To overcome the perception that space has little relevance to societal
needs, the space community should provide forward-looking, thoroughly researched, and technically grounded
options for possible futures involving the exploration and development of space. Without this input, and efforts to
educate policy-makers and the public on long-term space visions, the public policy process will tend to favor a risk-
averse approach and, lacking insight as to what may lie beyond the horizon, will not recognize the role of space
exploration and development in the big picture.
There are indications that today’s space visionaries are found mainly in the commercial sector rather than the
civil sector. This may be true, judging from all the attention in recent years to suborbital space tourism, privately-
owned orbital habitats, prize competitions, online map services using satellite imagery, and new applications in
8
9. handheld devices that depend on communications and navigation satellites. But the commercial space sector is no
stranger to overpromising. In the 1980s, there were many assurances of substantial near-term profits in launch
services, remote sensing, and microgravity materials processing that have yet to be realized. Commercial space
visionaries should not be too sanguine about their ability to turn their dreams into realities more effectively than
their counterparts in the civil arena. Hopefully, creative thinking using a multidisciplinary approach will be shared
across the civil and commercial sectors, since both need it and each can learn from the other. Both sectors face the
difficulty of promoting very long-term visions in an instant gratification society. In order to succeed, they will need
to demonstrate results at milestones along a clear path to widely recognized strategic objectives.
V. Conclusion
There is no shortage of futurists today, but there does seem to be a lack of opportunities to harness their talents
to look at possible futures in space beyond the next quarterly report, the next election, or the next budget cycle. At
the beginning of the space age, everyone in the embryonic space community had to be a futurist. Space systems and
ground infrastructure had yet to be built, missions had to be proposed and defined, and requirements that would
remain valid for many years had to be envisioned. The space community is much larger today, and has settled into
ongoing operations that provide services such as communications, Earth observation, and navigation. But although
space applications are integrated into the fabric of society, and many other nations are developing their space
capabilities, forward-thinking is no less important to the United States today than it was at the dawn of the space
age. As Gerry O’Neill has noted:
The long-term health of a nation is probably shown most clearly by the time scale of the programs it
undertakes. The willingness to commit to ventures of many years’ duration, with potential very large returns,
is the hallmark of a nation confident of its own future. The fear of any commitment beyond one or two years
is the symptom of disease, signaling a fundamentally hopeless view of the future and the intention to cut the
losses and get out of the game. 39
Numerous challenges face our planet in the coming decades that will require us to “commit to ventures of many
years’ duration.” Many of them, including high-visibility concerns such as environmental degradation and climate
change, are amenable to the application of space technology. As these problems move higher on the public agenda,
the nation and the world will look to space technology for information and solutions. We should be ready to answer
that call. In fact, space futurism should allow us to be ready far in advance so that plans and programs are in place
when the call comes.
As we contemplate how space efforts can help us make the future a better place, we should keep in mind this
caution from Arthur C. Clarke:
[T]here is rather more to space exploration than shooting men into orbit, or taking photos of the far side of
the Moon. These are merely the trivial preliminaries to the age of discovery that is now about to dawn.
Though that age will provide the necessary ingredients for a renaissance, we cannot be sure that one will
follow. The present situation has no exact parallel in the history of mankind; the past can provide hints, but
no firm guidance. 40
References
1
Robert J. Lempert, Steven W. Popper, & Steven C. Bankes, Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for
Quantitative, Long-Term Policy Analysis (RAND Corp., Santa Monica, California, 2003), pp. 1-3.
2
For example, the World Future Society’s website displays a self-selected list of nearly 50 “consulting futurists” who are
offering their services to private sector and government customers. (http://www.wfs.org/consult.htm, accessed March 17,
2008).
3
Edward Cornish, Futuring: The Exploration of the Future (World Future Society, Bethesda, Maryland, 2004), p. xii.
4
Collier’s magazine featured the human conquest of space in eight issues from 1952 to 1954. Contributors included Wernher
von Braun, Willy Ley, Cornelius Ryan, and Fred L. Whipple. These authors and others provided an expanded presentation
of this information in book form in Cornelius Ryan (ed.), Across the Space Frontier (New York: Viking Press, 1952).
5
Disney DVD, “Tomorrowland: Disney in Space and Beyond,” released May 18, 2004. Includes “Man in Space,” originally
aired March 9, 1955; “Man and the Moon,” originally aired December 28, 1955; and “Mars and Beyond,” originally aired
December 4, 1957.
6
Roger Launius, “Looking Backward/Looking Forward: Space Flight at the Turn of the New Millennium,” Astropolitics,
Vol. 1, No. 2, Autumn 2003, pp. 64-74.
7
Arthur C. Clarke, “Extraterrestrial Relays,” Wireless World, October 1945.
8
Arthur C. Clarke, Profiles of the Future (New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1963), pp. 190-193.
9
10. 9
Arthur C. Clarke, The Promise of Space (New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1968), p. 208.
10
Dandridge Cole & Donald Cox, Islands in Space: The Challenge of the Planetoids (Philadelphia: Chilton Company, 1964),
p. 24.
11
Cole & Cox, p. 29.
12
Dandridge Cole, Beyond Tomorrow: The Next 50 Years in Space (Amherst, Wisconsin: Amherst Press, 1965), p. 32.
13
Cole (1965), p. 46.
14
Hudson Institute History, http://www.hudson.org/learn/index.cfm?fuseaction=history, accessed April 2008.
15
Herman Kahn & Anthony J. Wiener, The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years (New
York: Macmillan Company, 1967), pp. 51-54.
16
Kahn & Wiener, pp. 55-56.
17
Herman Kahn el al., The Next 200 Years: A Scenario for America and the World (New York: William Morrow & Co.,
1976), pp. 4-5.
18
Gerard K. O’Neill, The High Frontier (New York: William Morrow & Co., 1976).
19
Gerard K. O’Neill, 2081: A Hopeful View of the Human Future (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1981), pp. 70-74.
20
Clarke (1963), pp. xi-xii.
21
Rachel Carson, Silent Spring (New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1962).
22
Some prominent examples include the following: Donella Meadows, Dennis Meadows, Jorgen Randers, William Behrens
III, “The Limits to Growth: A Report to The Club of Rome,” 1972 (executive summary at
http://www.clubofrome.org/docs/limits.rtf, accessed April 5, 2007); the most recent update of this work in Donella
Meadows, Dennis Meadows, Jorgen Randers, Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update (White River Junction, Vermont:
Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2004); Paul Kennedy, Preparing for the Twenty-First Century (New York: Random
House, 1993); Jared Diamond, Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed (New York; Viking Press, 2005);
Thomas Homer-Dixon, The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization (Washington: Island
Press, 2006).
23
NASA, “America's Next Decade in Space: A Report for the Space Task Group,” 1969.
24
Space Task Group, “The Post-Apollo Program: Directions for the Future,” September 1969.
25
National Commission on Space, Pioneering the Space Frontier (New York: Bantam Books, 1986).
26
National Security Decision Directive 293, “Fact Sheet: Presidential Directive on National Space Policy,” February 11, 1988.
27
George H.W. Bush, “Remarks by the President at 20th Anniversary of Apollo Moon Landing,” July 20, 1989.
28
Dwayne Day, “Doomed to Fail: The Birth and Death of the Space Exploration Initiative” Spaceflight, Vol. 37 (1995), pp.
79-83.
29
National Security Presidential Directive (NSPD) 31, “U.S. Space Exploration Policy,” January 14, 2004.
30
For a detailed discussion of this point, see James A. Vedda, “Humans to Mars: Logical Step or Dangerous Distraction?”
Presented at AIAA Space 2007, Long Beach, California, September 19, 2007 (AIAA 2007-9922).
31
For a more extensive discussion of political, economic, and societal risks to long-term sustainability, see James A. Vedda,
“Challenges to the Sustainability of Space Exploration,” Astropolitics, 6:1, January-April 2008, pp. 22-49.
32
World Future Society, “Best Recent Books and Reports,” http://www.wfs.org/fsbest06.htm (accessed March 17, 2008).
33
RAND Corporation, Frederick S. Pardee Center, “50 Books for Thinking About the Future Human Condition,” November
28, 2007 (http://rand.org/international_programs/pardee/50books/, accessed March 17, 2008).
34
http://rand.org/pubs/online/science_technology/, accessed March 17, 2008.
35
Center for Strategic and International Studies, “Human Space Exploration Initiative,” http://www.csis.org/hse/, accessed
October 2007.
36
Donella Meadows, Dennis Meadows, Jorgen Randers, Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update (White River Junction,
Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2004), p. 175.
37
Lempert, p. 13.
38
Mike McConnell, “Overhauling Intelligence,” Foreign Affairs, July/August 2007, pp. 49-58.
39
O’Neill (1981), p. 70.
40
Clarke (1963), p. 94.
10