ESP COURSE
DESIGN AND ITS
RELATED ISSUES
OBJECTIVES:
Define and
explain the ESP
and ESP Course
Design
Explore the stages
involved in designing
an Effective ESP
course, including
needs analysis, goal
setting, syllabus and
course design,
pedagogical
approaches; and
Investigate
common challenges
faced when
designing ESP
courses.
What is ESP?
 English for specific purposes is a term that
refers to teaching or studying English for a
particular career.
It involves teaching and learning the specific
skills and language needed by particular
learners for specific purpose.
An ESP program is therefore built on an
assessment of purposes and needs and the
functions for which English is required.
What is ESP Course Design?
o ESP course design refers to the process of
creating structured and tailored English
language courses for specific purposes,
industries, or contexts.
o it involves developing a curriculum, materials,
and teaching methodologies that address the
unique language needs of learners within a
particular field or profession.
o A course design in ESP is a systematic data
collection process in which tasks and activities
are developed, and data is collected to prepare
effective tasks and activities and to create the
best possible setting for ESP learners to meet
COURSE DESIGN is a
NEGOTIATED PROCESS
There is no particular aspect that has a purely
determining influence on the subject matter of
the course. As part of teaching-learning
process, both ESO teaching-learning situation
and the target situation have an impact on the
syllabus, materials, methods, and evaluation
procedures. In similar manner, each of these
components will influence and be influenced
by the others.
COURSE DESIGN is a
DYNAMIC PROCESS
Scholars claim that a course design does not
move linearly from initial analysis to complete
the course. Needs and resources vary with
time. The course design, therefore, needs to
have a built-in feedback channels to enable the
course to respond to developments.
PLANNING,
DEVELOPING AND
IMPLEMENTING
ESP PROGRAM
Course design refers to the planning and
development of a course to reach the desired
goals. It is the result of several factors: the
result of the needs analysis, the course
designer’s approach to syllabus and
methodology, and existing materials
(Robinson: 1991). In the same line of thought,
Hutchinson and Waters (1987: 65) have
defined a course as “An integrated series of
teaching-learning experiences, whose
ultimate aim is to lead the learners to a
particular state of knowledge.”
5 key Stages in ESP
-Dudley-Evans and St. John (1998):
analysis of learner’s
needs
syllabus and course
design
Material production
teaching and learning
evaluation
Needs Analysis
It is the process of establishing the what
and how of a course; it is the cornerstone
of ESP and leads to a very focused
course.
It is the process of getting information
on learners’ language needs, which will
help in drawing up a profile to establish
coherent objectives and take subsequent
decisions on course content.
3 Main Purposes:
(Richards, 1996)
• Provides a mean obtaining wider input into the
content, design and implementation of
language program
• Can be used in developing goals, objectives
and contents
• Serves as a means of evaluating an existing
program
Needs Analysis
Techniques in
collecting data
1. Formal techniques
(interview,
assessments)
2. Informal techniques
(classroom
observation,
self-rating scale)
Guidelines for
questionnaires and
interview
constructions:
1. students’ background
2. Language style
3. Language needs
Syllabus/Course design
•Syllabus development
•Instructional methodology or approach
•Assessment procedure
4 main components of syllabus:
•Objectives,
•Methods or methodologies,
•Materials, and
•evaluation
Syllabus design and course
design
GRAMMAR OR
STRUCTURAL
SYLLABUS
The content of the
language teaching is
a collection of the
forms and structures
of the language
being taught.
SITUATIONAL
SYLLABUS
The content of the
language teaching is
a collection of the
imaginary situations
where the language
is used.
TASK-BASED
SYLLABUS
The content of the
language teaching
includes a series of
purposeful tasks that
language learners
need to perform.
Syllabus design and course
design
Language-centered
Drawing connection
between analysis of
target
situation and the
content of ESP
courses
skill-centered
founded on two
principles: theoretical
and
pragmatics.
Learning-centered
focuses on students’
learning. Determined
by the
learner. Builds on
prior knowledge and
skills.
Material selection
4 basic precepts in ESP
material development:
Suitability for the
proficiency level
Relevance to learners’
needs
Creativity in
tasks/activities and
discursive strategies; and
Stimulation of the target
Teaching and learning
Common Instructional Tasks:
role-play
simulation
case-study
project work
oral presentation
Teaching and learning
It is necessary for an Esp teacher
to be equipped with the principles
and approaches/methods in
teaching such as:
1. Communicative Language
Teaching
2. Total Physical Response
3. Cooperative Language Learning
Evaluation
Evaluation in ESP situations is
concerned with the effectiveness and
efficiency of learning; with achieving
the objectives (assuming that the
needs analysis has set valid
objectives). Has learning been
maximized? Have resources been
optimally employed? Our focus in this
chapter is on evaluation as used by
teachers and learners and on
formative evaluation; we are less
concerned with large-scale project
evaluation involving outsiders (the
ISSUES
INVOLVED IN ESP
COURSE DESIGN
Abilities Required for
Successful Communication in
Occupational Setting
Cummins (1979) theorized a dichotomy
between basic interpersonal
communication skills (BICS) and cognitive
academic language proficiency (CALP)
Content Language
Acquisition versus General
Language Acquisition
One of the central
questions that needed to
be answered was “how
much time would be
devoted to vocabulary and
content knowledge
acquisition, as opposed to
the time spent developing
Heterogeneous Learner
Group Versus Homogeneous
Learner Group
Minimum entrance standards must be
established in the areas of language
level, motivation, and prior education
and experience.
These standards must be strictly
enforced at the time of placement.
Materials Development
Do ESP textbooks really exist?
“ESP teachers find themselves in
a situation where they are
expected to produce a course
that exactly matches the needs
of a group of learners, but are
expected to do so with no, or
very limited, preparation time”
RELATING NEEDS
ANALYSIS TO ESP
COURSE DESIGN
NEEDS ANALYSIS-ESP COURSE
DESIGN
The study of Barkane
(2017) investigated the
role of needs analysis in
the design of effective
ESP course taking the
case of master one
student of Finance and
International Trade at
Mohamed Khider
The result of the study
conducted showed that
students’ low proficiency
level in ESP classes is due
to the inappropriate ESP
courses that are not
predetermined by their
needs.
https://www.menti.com/aln2
aq5xuegf
THANK YOU!!!!

report_esp PowerPoint Presentations.pptx

  • 1.
    ESP COURSE DESIGN ANDITS RELATED ISSUES
  • 2.
    OBJECTIVES: Define and explain theESP and ESP Course Design Explore the stages involved in designing an Effective ESP course, including needs analysis, goal setting, syllabus and course design, pedagogical approaches; and Investigate common challenges faced when designing ESP courses.
  • 3.
    What is ESP? English for specific purposes is a term that refers to teaching or studying English for a particular career. It involves teaching and learning the specific skills and language needed by particular learners for specific purpose. An ESP program is therefore built on an assessment of purposes and needs and the functions for which English is required.
  • 4.
    What is ESPCourse Design? o ESP course design refers to the process of creating structured and tailored English language courses for specific purposes, industries, or contexts. o it involves developing a curriculum, materials, and teaching methodologies that address the unique language needs of learners within a particular field or profession. o A course design in ESP is a systematic data collection process in which tasks and activities are developed, and data is collected to prepare effective tasks and activities and to create the best possible setting for ESP learners to meet
  • 5.
    COURSE DESIGN isa NEGOTIATED PROCESS There is no particular aspect that has a purely determining influence on the subject matter of the course. As part of teaching-learning process, both ESO teaching-learning situation and the target situation have an impact on the syllabus, materials, methods, and evaluation procedures. In similar manner, each of these components will influence and be influenced by the others.
  • 6.
    COURSE DESIGN isa DYNAMIC PROCESS Scholars claim that a course design does not move linearly from initial analysis to complete the course. Needs and resources vary with time. The course design, therefore, needs to have a built-in feedback channels to enable the course to respond to developments.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Course design refersto the planning and development of a course to reach the desired goals. It is the result of several factors: the result of the needs analysis, the course designer’s approach to syllabus and methodology, and existing materials (Robinson: 1991). In the same line of thought, Hutchinson and Waters (1987: 65) have defined a course as “An integrated series of teaching-learning experiences, whose ultimate aim is to lead the learners to a particular state of knowledge.”
  • 9.
    5 key Stagesin ESP -Dudley-Evans and St. John (1998): analysis of learner’s needs syllabus and course design Material production teaching and learning evaluation
  • 10.
    Needs Analysis It isthe process of establishing the what and how of a course; it is the cornerstone of ESP and leads to a very focused course. It is the process of getting information on learners’ language needs, which will help in drawing up a profile to establish coherent objectives and take subsequent decisions on course content.
  • 11.
    3 Main Purposes: (Richards,1996) • Provides a mean obtaining wider input into the content, design and implementation of language program • Can be used in developing goals, objectives and contents • Serves as a means of evaluating an existing program
  • 12.
    Needs Analysis Techniques in collectingdata 1. Formal techniques (interview, assessments) 2. Informal techniques (classroom observation, self-rating scale) Guidelines for questionnaires and interview constructions: 1. students’ background 2. Language style 3. Language needs
  • 13.
    Syllabus/Course design •Syllabus development •Instructionalmethodology or approach •Assessment procedure
  • 14.
    4 main componentsof syllabus: •Objectives, •Methods or methodologies, •Materials, and •evaluation
  • 15.
    Syllabus design andcourse design GRAMMAR OR STRUCTURAL SYLLABUS The content of the language teaching is a collection of the forms and structures of the language being taught. SITUATIONAL SYLLABUS The content of the language teaching is a collection of the imaginary situations where the language is used. TASK-BASED SYLLABUS The content of the language teaching includes a series of purposeful tasks that language learners need to perform.
  • 16.
    Syllabus design andcourse design Language-centered Drawing connection between analysis of target situation and the content of ESP courses skill-centered founded on two principles: theoretical and pragmatics. Learning-centered focuses on students’ learning. Determined by the learner. Builds on prior knowledge and skills.
  • 17.
    Material selection 4 basicprecepts in ESP material development: Suitability for the proficiency level Relevance to learners’ needs Creativity in tasks/activities and discursive strategies; and Stimulation of the target
  • 18.
    Teaching and learning CommonInstructional Tasks: role-play simulation case-study project work oral presentation
  • 19.
    Teaching and learning Itis necessary for an Esp teacher to be equipped with the principles and approaches/methods in teaching such as: 1. Communicative Language Teaching 2. Total Physical Response 3. Cooperative Language Learning
  • 20.
    Evaluation Evaluation in ESPsituations is concerned with the effectiveness and efficiency of learning; with achieving the objectives (assuming that the needs analysis has set valid objectives). Has learning been maximized? Have resources been optimally employed? Our focus in this chapter is on evaluation as used by teachers and learners and on formative evaluation; we are less concerned with large-scale project evaluation involving outsiders (the
  • 21.
  • 22.
    Abilities Required for SuccessfulCommunication in Occupational Setting Cummins (1979) theorized a dichotomy between basic interpersonal communication skills (BICS) and cognitive academic language proficiency (CALP)
  • 23.
    Content Language Acquisition versusGeneral Language Acquisition One of the central questions that needed to be answered was “how much time would be devoted to vocabulary and content knowledge acquisition, as opposed to the time spent developing
  • 24.
    Heterogeneous Learner Group VersusHomogeneous Learner Group Minimum entrance standards must be established in the areas of language level, motivation, and prior education and experience. These standards must be strictly enforced at the time of placement.
  • 25.
    Materials Development Do ESPtextbooks really exist? “ESP teachers find themselves in a situation where they are expected to produce a course that exactly matches the needs of a group of learners, but are expected to do so with no, or very limited, preparation time”
  • 26.
    RELATING NEEDS ANALYSIS TOESP COURSE DESIGN
  • 27.
    NEEDS ANALYSIS-ESP COURSE DESIGN Thestudy of Barkane (2017) investigated the role of needs analysis in the design of effective ESP course taking the case of master one student of Finance and International Trade at Mohamed Khider The result of the study conducted showed that students’ low proficiency level in ESP classes is due to the inappropriate ESP courses that are not predetermined by their needs.
  • 28.
  • 29.