2. The Central Dogma
“At this stage I must make four points about the formulation of the
central dogma which have occasionally produced misunderstandings…
(1) It says nothing about what the machinery of transfer is made of,
and in particular nothing about errors. (it was assumed that, in
general, the accuracy of transfer was high.)
(2) It says nothing about control mechanisms – that is, about the rate
at which the processes work.
(3) It was intended to apply only to present-day organisms, and not to
events in the remote past, such as the origin of life or the origin of the
code.
(4) It is not the same, as is commonly assumed, as the sequence
hypothesis, which was clearly distinguished from it in the same article.
In particular the sequence hypothesis was a positive statement, saying
that the (overall) transfer nucleic acid → protein did exist, whereas
the central dogma was a negative statement, saying that these
transfers from protein did not exist.
Francis Crick, 1970
3. The Central Dogma
“At this stage I must make four points about the formulation of the
central dogma which have occasionally produced misunderstandings…
(1) It says nothing about what the machinery of transfer is made of,
and in particular nothing about errors. (it was assumed that, in
general, the accuracy of transfer was high.)
(2) It says nothing about control mechanisms – that is, about the rate
at which the processes work.
(3) It was intended to apply only to present-day organisms, and not to
events in the remote past, such as the origin of life or the origin of the
code.
(4) It is not the same, as is commonly assumed, as the sequence
hypothesis, which was clearly distinguished from it in the same article.
In particular the sequence hypothesis was a positive statement, saying
that the (overall) transfer nucleic acid → protein did exist, whereas
the central dogma was a negative statement, saying that these
transfers from protein did not exist.
Francis Crick, 1970
“Stated in this way it is clear that the special transfers are
those about which there is the most uncertainty. It might
indeed have ‘profound implications for molecular biology’ if
any of these special transfers could be shown to be …
widely distributed.”
4. Non-coding RNAs
Known for decades
Functionality disputed
Often labelled ‘junk’
Increasingly shown to
have regulatory roles
Kevin V. Morris & John S. Mattick, 2014 , & Palazzo & Lee, 2015
5. Epigenetics
Meaning “above or
around” genetics
Precise meaning disputed
Chemical or non-sequence
based changes
Affecting gene expression
or activity
Information carried on the
genome that is not coded by the
DNA
Definitions: must it be heritable?
7. Histone Modifications - Acetylation
Neutralises charge of basic
Lysine
Charge change disrupts
higher order structure
Activation of Transcription
Other cell cycle steps
Persists for DNA repair
Also associated with replication
HBO1 (histone acetyltransferase
bound to ORC) associated with
replication.
8. Histone Modifications - Methylation
May activate or repress
transcription
Site specific
Contradictory signals possible
For example: H3K27 and H3K4
methylation
Involved in silent and activated
chromatin, respectively
Signals are complicated, and at
times contradictory:
ES cells shown (Azuara et al
2006) to have H3K27me and
H3K4me
9. DNA Methylation
Predominantly methylation of
5’Cytosine in CpG context
CpG islands in 40% of promoters
Methylation ≈ lack of expression
Mutation hotspot – spontaneous
deamination to Thymine
CpG underrepresented in genome
10. Effects of Epigenetic Modifications
Chromatin Structure and Remodelling
Euchromatin = accessible
Heterochromatin = inaccessible
Recruitment of Proteins
Result: Heritable and reversible
gene silencing
N. Sasai and P.A. Defossez, 2009
11. Effects of Epigenetic Modifications
Chromatin Structure and Remodelling
Euchromatin = accessible
Heterochromatin = inaccessible
Recruitment of Proteins
Result: Heritable and reversible
gene silencing
N. Sasai and P.A. Defossez, 2009
14. Epigenetics in Differentiation
Differentiation is epigenetic
Methylation “cleared” in
early development.
Patterns of epigenetic
silencing created during
differentiation
Wolf Reik, 2007
17. Chromatin-associated RNA
Li X & Fu X, 2017
Chromatin-associated RNA involved in
transcriptional activation or repression
RNAs that are physically associated with
chromatin.
Either retained in cis at their site of
transcription or recruited in trans to other
genomic regions.
Chromatin-associated RNAs belong to
several classes including both short and long
ncRNAs
RNAs that are physically associated with
chromatin.
Either retained in cis at their site of
transcription or recruited in trans to other
genomic regions.
Chromatin-associated RNAs belong to
several classes including both short and long
ncRNAs
18. Discovery of chromatin-associated RNA
Experimental strategies to identify chromatin-
associated RNAs and subsequent understanding
of their roles:
i. Chromatin-associated RNA sequencing
(ChAR-seq)
ii. Molecular and biochemical methods
iii. Epigenetics analysis
Sridhar, Bharat et al., 2017
Maps genome-wide RNA-to-DNA contacts
19. Discovery of chromatin-associated RNA
Experimental strategies to identify chromatin-
associated RNAs and subsequent
understanding of their roles:
i. Chromatin-associated RNA sequencing
(ChAR-seq)
ii. Molecular and biochemical methods
iii. Epigenetics analysis
Delás MJ, Hannon GJ, 2017
Knockdown by siRNA, LNA, ASO and CRISPRi.
Insertion of an early terminator sequence or
complete deletion of the locus or promoter.
Different tools for different questions
20. Discovery of chromatin-associated RNA
Experimental strategies to identify chromatin-
associated RNAs and subsequent
understanding of their roles:
i. Chromatin-associated RNA sequencing
(ChAR-seq)
ii. Molecular and biochemical methods
iii. Epigenetics analysis
Sridhar, Bharat et al., 2017
DNA in closed heterochromatin is resistant to
digestion or transposition. Conversely, DNA in
open euchromatin is vulnerable to nuclease and
transposase.
Endonuclease
Chromatin accessibility
DNase Seq
ATAC Seq
21. Discovery of chromatin-associated RNA
Experimental strategies to identify chromatin-
associated RNAs and subsequent
understanding of their roles:
i. Chromatin-associated RNA sequencing
(ChAR-seq)
ii. Molecular and biochemical methods
iii. Epigenetics analysis
@Pine Biotech
DNA Methylation Analysis
Bisulfite Sequencing
25. RNAi and epigenetics
The scope of this review is to provide an overview of
the roles of small RNA and … in epigenetic inheritance
via heterochromatin formation
RNA interference (RNAi) is important in directing
heterochromatin assembly at centromeres in
fission yeast,…
27. S. pombe
RNAi-directed heterochromatin formation
1
6
5
4
3
2
Ekwall K, 2007
1. Precursor siRNA (P-siRNA) is generated
2. P-siRNA serves as a template for Rdp1
to produce a long duplex RNA
3. Processed by Dicer into siRNA
4. Guides RITS into the target
5. Recruit Clr4 and HDAC
6. Reinforce the regulatory loop of siRNA
production
28. What do the jumping genes do?
Transposable elements
(jumping genes) Functional
Non
Functional
1
2
Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics @ Penn State
1. Landing inside a gene can result in disruption of
that gene.
2. Transposition can activate nearby genes.
29. PIWI-interacting RNAs: small RNAs with big functions
Transposable elements
(jumping genes)
21–35 nucleotides in length.
Transcribed from genomic loci known as piRNA
clusters.
Silence transposable elements, regulate gene
expression and fight viral infection.
In most animals, piRNAs defend the germline
genome against transposon mobilization
How the piRNA pathway discriminates between self
transcripts and non-self transcripts remains a central
question in piRNA research.
Ozata DM, et al., 2018
33. Non-protein-coding RNA molecules that’re
>200nt.
Resemble mRNA (transcribed by RNA pol II,
are often capped and polyadenylated).
Exhibit cell, tissues, and developmental stage
specific expression pattern.
Categorized as antisense, intronic,
bidirectional and intergenic.
Reside in the nucleus or cytoplasm.
Exploit biological functional diversity
LncRNAs
Chu C, et al., 2015
39. Ayub ALP, et al 2019 & Gagnon KT, Corey DR, 2012 & Wing, J. & O'Connor, C, 2008
The X-inactive-specific transcript (Xist).
17- to 20-kb RNA that expressed only from
the inactive X chromosome (Xi) and coats the
X chromosome in cis.
Xist RNA is expressed and initiates XCI only
when more than one X chromosome is
present.
Through a conserved repeat motif (RepA),
Xist binds PRC2, targets PRC2 to the Xi for
H3K27me3.
XIST Exists to
Silence
40. Ayub ALP, et al 2019 & Gagnon KT, Corey DR, 2012 & Wing, J. & O'Connor, C, 2008
X-chromosomal “painting” by Xist RNA is
associated with the accumulation of (PRC2) on
the X chromosome and subsequent deposition
of H3K27me3 mark
41. Ayub ALP, et al 2019 & Gagnon KT, Corey DR, 2012 & Wing, J. & O'Connor, C, 2008
Xist is controlled by two other lncRNAs, one
acting negatively (Tsix), the other positively (Jpx)
LncRNA REGULATORS OF Xist
42. Leeb M, et al., 2009
Tsix keeps Xist Expression in Check
Tsix mediated recruitment of Dnmt3a/b
xiRNAs have been implicated in inhibition of
Xist expression.
43. Sun S, et al 2013
Jpx RNA binds CTCF, and extricates CTCF from
one Xist allele.
POSITIVE Xist REGULATORS
44. IPSC and Epigenetic reprogramming
Differentiation is epigenetic
Differentiated cells can be turned
into stem cells (iPSCs) (Takahashi
and Yamanaka)
ncRNA crucial to this process/ESC
Lack of functional Dicer or DGCR8
causes delays and defects in
differentiation
miRNAs promote differentiation or
the pluripotent state
miR-134, miR-296, miR-470 target
mRNA from Nanog, Oct4, Sox2,
promoting differentiation
Let-7 miRNAs promote loss of
pluripotency markers via hundreds
of target genes
miR-290-295 miRNAs increase
Lin28, which interfere with Let-7
function
45. IPSC Generation – Enhancement through RNA
miR-290-295 enhanced
iPSC generation by Oct4,
Sox2, and Klf4
Similarly, inhibition of
let-7 miRNA increased
efficiency of a MEF/OSK
system.
UTF1 and p53 siRNA increase
iPSC generation by 100x
Cell colonies created from 10^5 cells, using 4 gene mixture: OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, c-MYC. With or without additional non-coding RNAs
Zhao et al., 2008
46. IPSC Generation – non-coding RNA alone
miRNA also sufficient to
generate iPSC
Serial transfections of miR-
302s, miR-200c, mir-369s
generated iPSC from
adipose stromal cells.
5 colonies generated from
50,000 cells
Teratomas formed by human mi-iPSCs implanted in
NOD/SCID mice. Bar = 100 µm.mi-IPS cell colonies. GFP reporter driven by Nanog promoter
Miyoshi et al., 2011
47. Advantages of RNA drugs
Specificity: Tissue or even
disease
Ease of off-target prediction and
avoidance
Pharmacoevolution
Can target any gene
Lasting effects – six months per
dose with the right chemistry
Hydrophobicity and stability can
be acheived chemically
Steven S. Dowdy, 2017
48. Uses – RNA Drugs on or near the Market
Effects of single dose subcutaneous Inclisiran, an siRNA targetting
Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin–Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9).
Fitzgerald et al. 2017
Inclisiran
Phase 3 trials completed this year with over 3000 participants
Further phase 3 trials ongoing 15,000 participants, to
examine cardiovascular outcomes
Not yet approved by FDA or others
Created by The Medicines Company – to be purchased by
Novartis for 9.7 billion USD
Nusinersen/Spinraza
FDA approved
Treatment of SMA
Phosphothorothioate
Causes alternate splicing of SMN2
Prohibitively expensive
Eteplirsen/Exondys 51
49. Uses – RNA Drugs on or near the Market
Effects of single dose subcutaneous Inclisiran, an siRNA targetting
Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin–Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9).
Fitzgerald et al. 2017
Inclisiran
Phase 3 trials completed this year with over 3000 participants
Further phase 3 trials ongoing 15,000 participants, to
examine cardiovascular outcomes
Not yet approved by FDA or others
Created by The Medicines Company – to be purchased by
Novartis for 9.7 billion USD
Nusinersen/Spinraza
FDA approved
Treatment of SMA
Phosphothorothioate
Causes alternate splicing of SMN2
Prohibitively expensive
Eteplirsen/Exondys 51
50. Uses – RNA Drugs on or near the Market
Effects of single dose subcutaneous Inclisiran, an siRNA targetting
Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin–Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9).
Fitzgerald et al. 2017
Inclisiran
Phase 3 trials completed this year with over 3000 participants
Further phase 3 trials ongoing 15,000 participants, to
examine cardiovascular outcomes
Not yet approved by FDA or others
Created by The Medicines Company – to be purchased by
Novartis for 9.7 billion USD
Nusinersen/Spinraza
FDA approved
Treatment of SMA
Phosphothorothioate
Causes alternate splicing of SMN2
Prohibitively expensive
Eteplirsen/Exondys 51
51. References
• Losko M, Kotlinowski J, Jura J. Long Noncoding RNAs in Metabolic Syndrome Related Disorders.
Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:5365209. doi:10.1155/2016/5365209
• Lam JK, Chow MY, Zhang Y, Leung SW. siRNA Versus miRNA as Therapeutics for Gene Silencing. Mol
Ther Nucleic Acids. 2015;4(9):e252. Published 2015 Sep 15. doi:10.1038/mtna.2015.23
• Chen X, Sun Y, Cai R, Wang G, Shu X, Pang W. Long noncoding RNA: multiple players in gene
expression. BMB Rep. 2018;51(6):280–289. doi:10.5483/bmbrep.2018.51.6.025
• Ana Luisa Pedroso Ayub, Debora D’Angelo Papaiz, Roseli da Silva Soares and Miriam Galvonas
Jasiulionis (July 17th 2019). The Function of lncRNAs as Epigenetic Regulators [Online First],
IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.88071. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/online-
first/the-function-of-lncrnas-as-epigenetic-regulators
• Wing, J. & O'Connor, C. (2008) Sex chromosomes in mammals: X inactivation. Nature Education
1(1):221
• Talon I, Janiszewski A, Chappell J, Vanheer L, Pasque V. Recent Advances in Understanding the
Reversal of Gene Silencing During X Chromosome Reactivation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:169.
Published 2019 Sep 3. doi:10.3389/fcell.2019.00169.
52. • Gagnon KT, Corey DR. Argonaute and the nuclear RNAs: new pathways for RNA-mediated control
of gene expression. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2012;22(1):3–16. doi:10.1089/nat.2011.0330
• Shim G, Kim D, Park GT, Jin H, Suh SK, Oh YK. Therapeutic gene editing: delivery and regulatory
perspectives. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017 Jun;38(6):738–753. doi: 10.1038/aps.2017.2. Epub 2017
Apr 10. under Creative Commons licence (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
• Lam JK, Chow MY, Zhang Y, Leung SW. siRNA Versus miRNA as Therapeutics for Gene
Silencing. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2015;4(9):e252. Published 2015 Sep 15.
doi:10.1038/mtna.2015.23
• Delás MJ, Hannon GJ. lncRNAs in development and disease: from functions to mechanisms. Open
Biol. 2017;7(7):170121. doi:10.1098/rsob.170121
Editor's Notes
Add figure from The Rise of Regulatory RNA and discuss up to 1989
Go into detail on Methylation and Acetylation
Methylation at H3K27 seems to be missing in both budding
and fission yeast. However H3K9 is present in fission
yeast where heterochromatin is more similar to higher
organisms. In fission yeast there is evidence that the
nucleation of heterochromatin (rather than its spreading)
involves the production of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs)
from transcripts emanating from centromeric repeats. The
dicer-mediated siRNAs are packaged into the RITS complex,
which then delivers H3K9 methylation to the sites of
heterochromatin formation. Recruitment of HP1 (Swi6 in
pombe) then allows spreading and maintenance of the
heterochromatic state (Zhang and Reinberg, 2006).
Recently bivalent domains have been found that possess
both activating and repressive modifications, which
somewhat shatters our simplistic view that activating versus
silencing modifications dictate distinct types of chromatin
environments (Bernstein et al., 2005). Bivalent
domains were discovered during the analysis of numerous
highly conserved noncoding elements in mouse embryonic
stem cells. The use of ChIP on CHIP technology
revealed that two methylation sites with conflicting output
(H3K27me and H3K4me) coexist in these bivalent domains
(Azuara et al., 2006; Bernstein et al., 2005). Classically
H3K27 methylation is implicated in silent chromatin
and H3K4 methylation is involved in active chromatin.
DNA methylation on N6-adenine in mammalian embryonic stem cells and DNA Methylation: An Introduction to the Biology and
the Disease-Associated Changes of a Promising Biomarker.
Heterochromatin (facultative vs constitutive) and euchromatin.
Methyl CpG binding protein can recruit histone methyltransferase protein complexes
These are interconnected processes. Modification can cause (bio)physical disruption of contacts, but can also recruit proteins to cause further modifications, creating a kind of feedback loop resulting in stable regions of e.g. heterochromatin
Heterochromatin (facultative vs constitutive) and euchromatin.
Methyl CpG binding protein can recruit histone methyltransferase protein complexes
These are interconnected processes. Modification can cause (bio)physical disruption of contacts, but can also recruit proteins to cause further modifications, creating a kind of feedback loop resulting in stable regions of e.g. heterochromatin
Find picture for each and discuss
Find picture for each and discuss
Subtle intro to IPSC. Use Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene
regulation in mammalian development .
Key developmental events are shown together with global epigenetic modifications and gene-expression patterns. Very early in development, DNA methylation is erased. In addition, pluripotency-associated genes begin to be expressed, and developmental genes are repressed by the PcG protein system and H3K27 methylation. During the differentiation of pluripotent cells such as ES cells, pluripotency-associated genes are repressed, potentially permanently, as a result of DNA methylation. At the same time, developmental genes begin to be expressed, and there is an increase in H3K4
methylation
Losko M, Kotlinowski J, Jura J. Long Noncoding RNAs in Metabolic Syndrome Related Disorders. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:5365209. doi:10.1155/2016/5365209
Types of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). Noncoding RNAs are classified into housekeeping and regulatory noncoding RNAs. Housekeeping ncRNAs include ribosomal (rRNA), transfer (tRNA), small nuclear (snRNA), and small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs). Regulatory noncoding RNAs are divided into short ncRNAs (<200 nucleotides) or long ncRNAs (>200 nucleotides) including microRNAs (miRNAs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), Piwi-associated RNAs (piRNAs), antisense RNAs (asRNAs), and enhancer RNAs (eRNAs).
In the MARGI procedure, chromatin is crosslinked, fragmented, and subsequently biotinylated and stabilized on streptavidin beads (Figure 1). A specially designed linker sequence is introduced to the first ligate with the 3′ end of RNA (RNA ligation), and then this RNA-ligated linker is ligated to DNA (DNA ligation). These ligation steps are controlled by the configuration of the linker and by sequential applications of different end modifications and ligation enzymes. Successfully ligated products, in the form of RNA-linker-DNA, are selected and converted to cDNA. This cDNA is circularized and then cut in the middle of the linker, producing cDNAs with the configuration left.half.Linker-DNA-RNA-right.half.Linker, which are subjected to paired-end sequencing. The left.half.Linker and the right.half.Linker are the two halves of the linker separated by a restriction site in the middle. These two halves serve to differentiate which end originated from RNA and which end was from DNA, respectively.
We developed MARGI (mapping RNA-genome interactions), a technology to massively reveal RNA-chromatin interactions from unperturbed cells. MARGI simultaneously identifies all chromatin-associated RNAs (caRNAs) and the respective genomic target loci of each caRNA. This changes the paradigm of analyzing one RNA at a time and enables the mapping of the native RNA-chromatin interaction network in a single experiment. The major innovation of the MARGI technology is to ligate caRNAs with their target genomic sequences by proximity ligation, forming RNA-DNA chimeric sequences, which are subsequently converted into a sequencing library and subjected to paired-end sequencing.
Different approaches for disrupting lncRNAs. Methods such as knockdown and CRISPRi affect the RNA itself or reduce the transcription of the lncRNA. Knockdown can be achieved in a variety of ways (siRNA, shRNA, LNA, ASO). CRISPRi is most efficient if Cas9 is fused to repressor domains (e.g. KRAB). These methods can also be transient. Insertion of an early terminator sequence or complete deletion of the locus or promoter are achieved via genome engineering and are non-reversible.
Different tools for different questions
The main consideration is that, in a particular lncRNA locus, the act of transcription itself could be key to establishing or maintaining the chromatin state of the surrounding area, while, in this scenario, the actual sequence of the RNA would be irrelevant. Or the RNA itself could be the functional unit, having some sequence-dependent interactions with proteins, RNAs or DNA elements. It could even be that both these mechanisms apply for the same locus. Therefore, it is very important to understand each experimental set-up and what it tells us about each particular lncRNA.
Several studies have taken advantage of RNA interference (RNAi) approaches, either transduced shRNAs or transfected siRNAs [46,47]. This strategy has been coupled with a phenotypic readout, such as viability or differentiation, to identify lncRNAs where the RNA molecule itself is important (figure 1). However, many worry about potential off-target effects (though this is no different from shRNA studies with protein-coding genes). There are additional concerns regarding the difficulty of knocking down lncRNAs that are chromatin-associated versus cytoplasmic, given that small RNA loading into the RISC complex takes places in the cytoplasm. While there is some evidence for differences in knockdown efficiency depending on subcellular location [48], this concern would apply only to lncRNAs that are never exported to the cytoplasm. LncRNAs that function in the nucleus but in trans could very well be exported just like other RNAs and then re-imported. Undoubtedly, the main advantage of knockdown is that it allows for high-throughput screens that could yield a list, though potentially incomplete, of lncRNAs with functions in the phenotypic assay of our choice.
DNase Seq DNA in closed heterochromatin is inaccessible to nucleases and is thus resistant to digestion. Conversely, DNA in open euchromatin is accessible to nucleases and is therefore vulnerable to nuclease mediated digestion.
The bisulfite treatment of DNA mediates the deamination of cytosine into uracil, and these converted residues will be read as thymine, as determined by PCR-amplification and subsequent Sanger sequencing analysis. However, 5 mC residues are resistant to this conversion and, so, will remain read as cytosine. Thus, comparing the Sanger sequencing read from an untreated DNA sample to the same sample following bisulfite treatment enables the detection of the methylated cytosines.
To generate RNA-seq dataset, RNA is first extracted from the sample (tissue or cell). After that specific enzyme called DNAse is used in order to get rid of DNA contamination. As a result, we obtain only RNAs. But the problem is that there are lots of different types of RNA (mRNA, tRNA, miRNA, and lots of rRNA). In order to estimate level of gene expression we only need mRNA. How we can isolate mRNAs? The most effective method is poly-A selection. This method takes into consideration specific structure of mRNA, which has poly-A sequence on one of the ends. Other types of RNA lack this sequence, thus only mRNAs can be extracted. After that all mRNAs are fragmented, reverse transcribed into cDNA (complementary DNA) and legated with sequencing adaptors. Finally, cDNAs are sequenced using next-generation sequencing technologies to produce many short reads. RNA-seq data ready for analysis. RNA-seq analysis starts by mapping reads to a reference genome.
The goal is to identify differentially expressed genes across conditions. RNA-seq reads are mapped to the reference genome, gene expression are quantified, differentially expressed genes are identified, Quantification
Quantifying gene expression by RNA-seq is to count the number of reads that map (i.e. align) to each gene. Based on the number of reads we can estimate expression level of this gene. Sometimes quantification can be very complicated due to strand specific genes. For example, when one gene is located on forward strand and second gene is located on reversed strand.
RNAi is a natural cellular process that inhibit gene expression in a post-transcriptional manner by promoting the degradation of mRNA. It plays an important role in gene regulation and innate defense against invading viruses
miRNA: Transcription of miRNA gene is carried out by RNA polymerase II in the nucleus to give pri-miRNA, which is then cleaved by Drosha to form pre-miRNA. The pre-miRNA is transported by Exportin 5 to the cytoplasm where it is processed by Dicer into miRNA. The miRNA is loaded into the RISC where the passenger strand is discarded, and the miRISC is guided by the remaining guide strand to the target mRNA through partially complementary binding. The target mRNA is inhibited via translational repression, degradation or cleavage.
On the other hand. siRNA: dsRNA (either transcribed or artificially introduced) is processed by Dicer into siRNA which is loaded into the RISC. AGO2, which is a component of RISC, cleaves the passenger strand of siRNA. The guide strand then guides the active RISC to the target mRNA. The full complementary binding between the guide strand of siRNA and the target mRNA leads to the cleavage of mRNA.
siRNAs and miRNAs have similar physicochemical properties but distinct functions Both are short RNA duplexes that target mRNA(s) to produce a gene silencing effect
In fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe), the RNAi machinery establishes and maintains the specialized heterochromatin structures at centromeres by an RNAi-directed transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) mechanism3. Similar TGS mechanisms have more recently been described in various eukaryotes, including chicken4, mouse5, human (where RNAi silences intergenic transcription in the β-globin cluster)6, Drosophila melanogaster (where RNAi directs heterochromatin formation)7, plants (reviewed in ref. 8), and Tetrahymena thermophila (where RNAi directs chromatin modifications and DNA elimination)9. Thus, RNAi-directed chromatin modification leading to TGS is a widespread phenomenon in eukaryotes.
How these siRNA direct heterochromatin formation ?
siRNAs produce sequence-dependent silencing by recruiting histone-modifying enzymes that initiate heterochromatin formation
Precursor siRNA generated by RNA pol II from a centromeric promoter, the so-called 'reverse promoter'12, serves as a template for the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (Rdp1) to produce a long duplex RNA, which is cleaved into short duplex siRNAs by Dicer (Dcr1). The siRNAs are passed on to RITS, which consists of three proteins: Ago1, Chp1 and Tas3. Ago1 binds siRNA and uses this as a to produce a long duplex RNAto homologous nascent RNA pol II transcripts in the centromeric region. The RITS complex then stimulates histone methylation of the centromere at H3-K9 by the Clr4 histone methyltransferase enzyme. Histone methylation has to be preceded by histone deacetylation of acetylated H3K9, carried out by HDAC enzymes. This leads to strengthened binding of RITS to chromatin, as Chp1 interacts with dimethylated H3-K9 through its chromodomain. The slicer activity of Ago1 was recently shown to be important for spreading of heterochromatin from centromeric chromatin into nearby marker gene insertions15. It was suggested that the role of slicer proteins in spreading heterochromatin is to cleave the nascent RNA to provide free 3′ ends for Rdp1 (ref. 15). This would reinforce the regulatory loop of siRNA production — that is, the recruitment of additional RITS complexes. Question marks, unknown mechanisms; arrows, Ago1 slicer activity and nucleosome modifications; purple 'lollipops', acetylated H3-K9; teal lollipops, dimethylated H3-K9. Image: Kim Caeser
Is it found in human?
RNA interference (RNAi)-related mechanisms in regulating intergenic transcription in the human β-globin gene cluster and further suggest that RNAi-dependent chromatin silencing in vertebrates is not restricted to the centromeres. intergenic transcripts are indeed specifically upregulated in cells knocked down for Dicer.
Pray, L. (2008) Transposons: The jumping genes. Nature Education 1(1):204
Transposable elements (TEs), also known as "jumping genes,“ are DNA sequences that move from one location on the genome to another.
What do all these jumping genes do, besides jump? Much of what a transposon does depends on where it lands. Landing inside a gene can result in disruption of that gene as it disrupt the reading frame, e.g. insertions of L1 into the factor VIII gene caused hemophilia (Kazazian et al., 1988). In other cases, transposition can activate nearby genes by bringing an enhancer of transcription (within the transposable element) close enough to a gene to stimulate its expression. If the target gene is not usually expressed in a certain cell type, this activation can lead to pathology, such as activation of a proto-oncogene causing a cell to become cancerous. researchers found L1 in the APC genes in colon cancer cells but not in the APC genes in healthy cells in the same individuals. This confirms that L1 transposes in somatic cells in mammals, and that this element might play a causal role in disease development (Miki et al., 1992). In other cases, no obvious phenotype results from the transposition.
PIWI-interacting RNAs: small RNAs with big functions
Deniz M. Ozata, Ildar Gainetdinov, Ansgar Zoch, Dónal O’Carroll & Phillip D. Zamore
PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are an animal-specific class of small silencing RNAs, distinct from microRNAs (miRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) having 2-nucleotide overhanging 3ʹ ends,. piRNAs bear 2ʹ-O-methyl-modified 3ʹ termini and guide PIWI-clade Argonautes (PIWI proteins) rather than the AGO-clade proteins, which function in the miRNA and siRNA pathways. Argonaute family proteins are classified into the AGO and PIWI clades. PIWI-clade proteins are often restricted to gonadal cells and are loaded with piRNAs of 21–35 nucleotides in length.
Both AGO and PIWI proteins contain three characteristic domains: PAZ, MID and PIWI. The PAZ domain, residing at the amino terminus, provides a binding pocket for the 3ʹ end of guide RNAs261,262. The PAZ domain differs between AGO and PIWI proteins. For example, human AGO1 binds less well to an RNA duplex containing a 3ʹ terminal 2ʹ-O-methyl group263, whereas the PAZ domains of PIWI proteins better accommodate the bulky 2ʹ-O-methyl modification
MID domain presents the seed sequence of the guide as a helix. Target cleavage occurs in the PIWI domain, whose RNase H-like fold presents a catalytic triad, aspartate–aspartate–glutamate (DDE), that positions a divalent cation, typically Mg2+, to hydrolyse the phosphodiester bond linking target nucleotides.
miRNAs and siRNAs derive from double-stranded RNA precursors, but piRNAs are processed from long single-stranded precursor transcripts. piRNA precursors are transcribed from genomic loci known as piRNA clusters. called clusters because they were initially defined by the high density of piRNAs maaping to them. In flies, piRNA precursors come from heterochromatic loci that lack the hallmarks of canonical transcription, such as the active promoter mark histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) (Fig. 1b,c), whereas in mammals, piRNA clusters appear to be indistinguishable from canonical euchromatic RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) transcription units. So how transcription occur from heterochromatin?
transcription facilitated by the germline-specific, H3K9me3-binding protein Rhino, a variant of heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1)61,62,67,68,69. Together with Deadlock (Del) and Cutoff (Cuff), Rhino bypasses the need for promoter sequences. Binding of Rhino to H3K9me3 tethers the germline-specific transcription initiation factor IIA subunit 1 (TFIIAL; also known as GTF2A1) paralogue, Moonshiner, along both strands of the piRNA cluster DNA. Moonshiner, in turn, forms an alternative TFIIA pre-initiation complex with TATA box-binding protein-related factor 2 (Trf2), allowing RNA Pol II to initiate transcription
In many arthropods, piRNA clusters correspond to large graveyards of transposon remnants20,24,25,26; in birds and mammals, piRNA clusters give rise to long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which are processed into piRNAs1,2,27. piRNA sequences are immensely diverse and rarely conserved among species
In most animals, at least a subset of piRNAs defend the germline genome against transposon mobilization3,7,20,28,29,30. How the piRNA pathway discriminates between self transcripts and non-self transcripts remains a central question in piRNA research.
piRNAs were first identified in the fly testis as a novel class of ‘long siRNAs’ that silence Stellate, a multi-copy gene on the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome. the Stellate protein crystalizes in spermatocytes, impairing male fertility. Y chromosome has amassed many copies of Suppressor of Stellate, a piRNA-producing gene derived from Stellate itself.
piRNAs guide PIWI proteins in gonads of insects3,6, mammals1,2,4,5, nematodes8,9 and fish7. To date, piRNAs and PIWI proteins have been found in the vast majority of animals, except for several species including most nematode.
maternally inherited piRNAs cannot protect progeny from novel transposons present only in the father. In flies, for example, when naive mothers mate with fathers bearing genomic insertions of the P element transposon, the offspring are sterile because they cannot silence P elements in their own germ cells.
Biogenesis and function of pre-pachytene piRNAs in the mouse male germline. Pre-pachytene piRNAs are expressed during embryonic development from genomic loci that often display bidirectional transcription. piRNA precursors are exported to the cytoplasm and directed to the processing machinery. After 5′ end processing by PLD6, the piRNA intermediates associate with MILI. The 3′ ends of piRNA intermediates are then trimmed and 3′ methylated by Trimmer and HENMT1, respectively, to generate mature primary piRNAs bound to MILI. These complexes can then engage in the ping-pong cycle leading to the cleavage of complementary antisense transcripts and the production of secondary piRNAs bound to either MILI or MIWI2.
The emergence of piRNAs against transposon invasion to preserve mammalian genome integrity
Christina Ernst,
Duncan T. Odom &
Claudia Kutter
The initial precursor PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA) must be processed at both ends. Processing at the 5ʹ end creates a monophosphorylated 5ʹ end that can bind the PIWI protein PRG-1. The 3ʹ end of the PIWI-bound pre-piRNA is then trimmed by PARN-1, followed by 2ʹ-O-methylation by HENN-1 to produce a mature worm piRNA (because worm piRNAs are 21 nucleotides long with a 5ʹ U bias, they are also known as 21U-RNAs). SAM and SAH are the methyl donor S-adenosylmethionine, and the product of methyl donation, S-adenosylhomocysteine, respectively.
Nearly all animals rely on piRNAs to defend the germline genome from transposon expression.
PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) silence transposons transcriptionally and post-transcriptionally. Nuclear PIWI proteins are guided by piRNAs to nascent transposon transcripts and generate heterochromatin via DNA or histone methylation, thus silencing transcription. In flies, Piwi promotes H3K9 methylation, a repressive chromatin mark, through recruitment of Eggless (also known as dSetdb1) by the Piwi-interacting mediator proteins Asterix and Panoramix. By contrast, piRNA-dependent transcriptional silencing in mouse fetal gonocytes directs both DNA and H3K9me3 histone methylation. Two recent reports show that pachytene piRNAs in spermatocyte cells regulate gene expression by guiding conventional, PIWI-dependent cleavage of targets.
In the cytoplasm, piRNAs elicit post-transcriptional silencing by directing PIWI proteins to slice target transcripts. The cytoplasmic PIWI proteins Aub and Ago3 in flies, Siwi and BmAgo3 in silkmoth and MILI and MIWI in mice mediate post-transcriptional transposon silencing
It recruits and scaffolds silencing factors such as Polycomb repressive complexes to initiate inactivation (ii) In parallel, it repels activating factors such as the cohesins to enable repressive complexes to operate. And (iii) it also reconfigures the Xi architecture into a unique 3D structure
they recruit or deceive chromatin modifying complexes and switch between activating and repressive epigenetic status
The X-inactive-specific transcript (XIST/Xist) was one of the first lncRNAs to be discovered in mammals
It recruits and scaffolds silencing factors such as Polycomb repressive complexes to initiate inactivation (ii) In parallel, it repels activating factors such as the cohesins to enable repressive complexes to operate. And (iii) it also reconfigures the Xi architecture into a unique 3D structure
It recruits and scaffolds silencing factors such as Polycomb repressive complexes to initiate inactivation (ii) In parallel, it repels activating factors such as the cohesins to enable repressive complexes to operate. And (iii) it also reconfigures the Xi architecture into a unique 3D structure
Xist RNA accumulates at the site of its transcription and spreads along the entire length of the chromosome, coating the Xi (Clemson et al., 1996). This chromosomal “painting” by Xist RNA is closely associated with the accumulation of polycomb repressor complex 2 (PRC2) on the X chromosome and subsequent deposition of the inactive histone marker H3K27me3 (Silva et al., 2003). In addition, a variety of proteins are known to be localized to the Xi during and following the initiation of X inactivation; these include another polycomb complex, PRC1 (Plath et al., 2004); structural maintenance of chromosomes hinge domain-containing 1 protein (SmcHD1) (Blewitt et al., 2008); a histone variant called macro histone H2A1 (Costanzi and Pehrson, 1998); a trithorax group protein Ash2l (Pullirsch et al., 2010) and a nuclear matrix protein, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein U (hnRNP U; also known as SP120 and SAF-A) (Helbig and Fackelmayer, 2003, Pullirsch et al., 2010). Although many of these proteins are functionally required for the establishment and maintenance of the Xi, none of them has been shown to regulate the unique localization of Xist RNA on the Xi itself (for review, see Brockdorff, 2002, Masui and Heard, 2006). BRCA1 has previously been proposed to regulate the chromosomal accumulation of Xist RNA (Ganesan et al., 2002, Silver et al., 2007). However, the localization of BRCA1 protein as well as its requirement for X inactivation remains largely controversial (Pageau et al., 2007, Xiao et al., 2007).
In this study, we show that hnRNP U is required for the association of Xist RNA with the Xi. RNAi-mediated knockdown of hnRNP U leads to lack of localization of Xist RNA on the Xi, and the accumulation of H3K27me3 also disappears in RNAi-treated cells. In addition, ES cells that do not express hnRNP U fail to form inactive X chromosomes, resulting in frequent biallelic expression of X-linked genes. We propose that hnRNP U is the Xist-interacting protein that tethers Xist RNA on the Xi through its DNA- and RNA-binding properties, which are necessary for the initiation of X inactivation.
Martin Leeb, Philipp A. Steffen & Anton Wutz (2009) X chromosome
inactivation sparked by non-coding RNAs, RNA Biology, 6:2, 94-99, DOI: 10.4161/rna.6.2.7716
A combined model for the regulation of Xist. The pluripotency
transcription factors Oct4, Nanog and Sox2 bind within intron 1 of Xist
(indicated as Oct4 hotspot), thereby repressing Xist in pluripotent cells of
the ICM. Exclusive expression patterns of Xist and Tsix are maintained by de
novo DNA methylation of the Xist promoter through Tsix mediated recruitment
of Dnmt3a/b. xiRNAs derived from Xist/Tsix duplexes have been implicated
in inhibition of Xist expression. RepA RNA has been proposed to activate
Xist transcription by competing with Tsix for binding of PRC2. Interactions
activating Xist transcription are indicated by arrow ending lines, inhibitory
interactions by bar-ending lines. Recruitment or processing is indicated by
dotted lines.
In pre-XCI cells, CTCF protein represses Xist transcription. At the onset of XCI, Jpx RNA is upregulated, binds CTCF, and extricates CTCF from one Xist allele. We demonstrate that CTCF is an RNA-binding protein and is titrated away from the Xist promoter by Jpx RNA. Thus, Jpx activates Xist by evicting CTCF.
Sun S, Del Rosario BC, Szanto A, Ogawa Y, Jeon Y, Lee JT. Jpx RNA activates Xist by evicting CTCF. Cell. 2013;153(7):1537–1551. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.028
Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene
regulation in mammalian development and paper from dropbox
Overcoming cellular barriers for RNA therapeutics
Use paper Overcoming cellular barriers for RNA therapeutics, siRNA vs miRNA as Therapeutics for Gene Silencing, and Talk about Exondys
Use paper Overcoming cellular barriers for RNA therapeutics, siRNA vs miRNA as Therapeutics for Gene Silencing, and Talk about Exondys
Use paper Overcoming cellular barriers for RNA therapeutics, siRNA vs miRNA as Therapeutics for Gene Silencing, and Talk about Exondys