SlideShare a Scribd company logo
From
R.Thangavel,M.E.,
Represented by his wife and Power of Attorney,
The Chief Manager, TPS-I, CPFNo:27329,
NLC,Neyveli- 3,
Cuddalore District.
To
The Director (HR),
Neyveli Lignite Corporation,
Neyveli.
Respected Sir,
Sub: Monetary benefits of Deputy General Manager from 19.08.09, the Date of
Joining at Rajasthan Barshingsar Project-Regularisation of period as duty
As the charge memo 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08
issued is illegal and inordinate delay as per central vigilance commission
manual -ACR Rating as “Out standing” as per Apex Court Judgement in
Civil Appeal 7631/02 and consequential benefits-to Promote as Deputy
General Manager or General Manager-Reg.
Ref: 1) Lr.No:5617/P&A II-4/91-22 by DGM (P&A), NLC. Dated:22.08.91.
2) Corp/P&A/502/355/08-28 DGM (P&A), NLC, Neyveli Dt:02.04.08
3) NLC CPIO Lr.No:PRD/CPIO/0062/2008-6 Dt: 08.07.08
4) W.P.No:17124/08. Dated:01.09.08
5) Lr.No: CORP/CGM/P&A/EE/0502/2008 Dated: 15.09.08
6) Review No: 103/08 without any order in M.P.No:1/08.Dt:24.09.08
7) Representation to CMD on 24.12.08
8) 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08
9) WASRNo: 15515/09 Dated: 04.03.09
10) PostalDepartment communication Dated: 12.03.09
11) 2b Petition dated: 27.05.09
12) WPNo: 11001/09 Dated: 24.06.09
13) Substituted order in W.P.No:17124/08 Dated:02.07.09
14) 2nd Substituted order in W.P.No:17124/08 Dated: 07.08.09
15) Disciplinary enquiry Dated: 10.09.09
16) Enquiry officer ReportDated: 16.09.09
17) Denied Reportby me Dated: 22.10.09.
18) Show cause notice Dated: 06.01.11 by G.M, Disciplinary
Authority,Barsginsar in O.ONo:5801/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2011 on 10.01.11
19) Denied Reportby me Dated: 18.01.11.
20)Order Dated: 02.02.11 by G.M,Disciplinary Authority, Barsginsar
in O.ONo:6071/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2011.
21) Appeal to Project head, the Appellate Authority on 07.02.11
22) Order Dated: 22.02.11 by the Project head, the Appelate Authority,
Barsginsar in O.ONo:6354/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2011 on 25.02.11.
23) Joined duty back to Neyveli on 23.09.11.
24)Appeal in Rating to Unit Head,Neyveli on 18.10.14 &19.03.15
25) Supreme Court Judgement Civil Appeal 7631/02.
26)Lr submitted to CMD,NLC &CVO,NLC to fix the seniority on 11.02.15.
27) Vigilance Department &CMD,NLC forwaded Director (HR)for necessary
action on 03.03.15.
28) DGM(P&A)Lr.No:CORP/HR/EB(Exec)/517/CM/2014-1 Dt:12.04.15
29) The CVO,NLC,Neyveli Cir.No.CORP/HR/DA/1643/2015 Dt:15.04.15
1. I, P. Chandira, wife of R. Thangavel,CPFNo:27329, who is working as
Chief Manager in Neyveli Lignite Corporation sincerely submits this letter
before the esteemed Neyveli Lignite Corporation on behalf of my husband as
Notary attested power of Attorney.
2. My husband Shri.R.Thangavel’s CPF No is 27329 and he joined in
Neyveli Lignite Corporation on 15.11.83. The board of directors conducted an
interview for selecting the candidate on their outstanding ability for Rajasthan
Barshingsar Project in the year of 1991. My husband Shri.R.Thangavel was
selected and the management has passed an order in Lr.No:5617/P&A II-4/91-
22 by DGM (P&A), NLC. Dated: 22.08.91 with monetary benefits of Next
higher grade. I herewith submit the copy of the letter as first document in the
attachment. As my husband asked job for me in the year 1991,the management
not instructed my husband to join at Rajasthan Project.
3. I am working as an Assistant Engineer in Tamilnadu Highways
Department from 25.01.98. When I was working as an Assistant Engineer in
Highways Department I was forced to do illegal activities punishable under
Indian Penal Codes. Hence I proceeded legally in O.A.No:2113/01 and
subsequently faced W.P.No:26463/01 and got orders in W.P.No:26463/01
Dated: 04.03.02, 14.03.02, 23.04.03 and 24.06.03. I am witness to Tamilnadu
State Vigilance in FIRNo:10/03 filed by the Inspector of
Police,V&AC,Cuddalore on 10.11.03. The inordinate delay in finalising the
case and to permit the accused to escape from clutches of law. Due to the
inordinate delay myself and my husband was harassed in many ways and still
the loss to the Government money has not recovered.
4. When we have planned to purchase an apartment in Pondicherry
through Thiru.Natarajan and Thiru.Ananthakrishnan in Pondicherry on
13.03.08.The General Manager,TPS-I counselled Thiru.Rao and
Thiru.Ananthakrishnan for Rajasthan Transfer in the year of 2008 which was
clearly explained in WANo:282/09 before Chennai High Court. Thiru.Natarajan
and Thiru.Ananthakrishnan planned to construct Pondicherry building in
violation of PPA Rules and Regulations. Thiru.Rao joined duty and
Thiru.Ananthakrishnan name was replaced with my husband in the year of 2008
in Corp/P&A/502/355/08-28 DGM (P&A), NLC, Neyveli Dt: 02.04.08. The
central public information officer in his letter dated:08.07.08 stated that my
husband is outstanding, talented and well experienced candidate need for
Project Site. I herewith submit the copy of the letter as second document in the
attachment.When there are 416 outstanding candidate was available in
Mechanical Discipline, the management transferred my husband. Hence it is
necessary to fix the seniority before 416 Engineers. Subsequently we have
planned to purchase an apartment in Valasaravakkam,Chennai through
Thiru.Natarajan on 14.05.08. The management has passed an extension on
22.05.08 up to 14.07.08. I herewith submit the copy of the seniority list
received through Right to Information Act as third document in the attachment.
As I am witness to Tamilnadu Vigilance Department I faced life threatening
hence myself and husband submitted a letter to the management to main the
“status quo”of the order until FIRNo:10/03 is pending on 11.07.08.The copy of
the letters are submitted as fourth and fifth document in Attachment.
5. CGM(P&A) passed a proceeding No: CORP/ P&A/EE/0502/2008
Dated: 15.09.08 based upon the order of W.P.No:17124/08 Dated: 01.09.08,
when the Miscellaneous Petition in Review No: 103/08 in W.P.No:17124/08
was pending. The management has not considered the same. The Hon’ble High
Court substituted the Order in W.P.No:17124/08 on 02.07.09 and subsequently
substituted on 07.08.09. When the Hon’ble High Court substituted the order
dated: 01.09.08 on 02.07.09 &07.08.09 the any proceedings initiated by the
management based upon the order of W.P.No:17124/08 is impugned proceeding
No: Lr.No: CORP/ P&A/EE/0502/2008 Dated: 15.09.08 and Memo No:
7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 is illegal and null and void.
Even though illegal charge memo created against the 2nd petitioner, he denied
the charges and attended enquiries, the departmental enquiry officer and
presenting officer closed the enquiry on 10.09.09 and the management ready to
provide the post of Deputy General Manager post and to regularise the period as
duty.The order in W.P.No:17124/08 as submitted as sixth document,
CGM(P&A)Lr.No:CORP/P&A/EE/0502/2008 Dated:15.09.08 as seventh
document, Memo No: 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 as eight
document in the attachment.
6. Even though my husband received order in WPSRNo: 15155/09 on
04.03.09 before the Division bench and directed the CMD to consider my
husband’s representation dated: 24.12.08. As per the representation submitted to
the CMD, my husband is eligible get monetary benefits of Deputy General
Manager with effect from 19.08.09. The Hon’ble High Court passed an order on
18.03.09 to join duty and submit his grievance to the management. The
management has followed a procedure by conducting interview for the selection
of outstanding candidates for Rajasthan Barshingsar Project in the year of 1991
with next higher grade benefit in DGM(P&A) Lr.No:5617/P&A II-4/91-22
Dated:22.08.91.My husband was transferred from ACM and hence he is eligible
to get monetary benefits of DGM the next higher grade as the Chief Manager
and ACM scale of pay is the same. Hence my husband is eligible for monetary
benefits for Deputy General Manager grade from 19.08.09. Even though the
charges issued are illegal to my husband he attended the departmental enquiry
and the enquiry officer and the presenting officer closed the enquiry
proceedings on 10.09.09 with the acceptance to grant Deputy General Manager
Promotion with effect from 19.08.09 and regularisation of Period as duty. If
they have not accepted to grant DGM Promotion and regularisation of period
they must have given “reasonable opportunity in accordance with Principles of
Natural Justice” provided the requested documents on 06.06.09 and 08.06.09 at
Rajasthan Barshingsar Project. The copy of the order WASRNo: 15515/09 as
ninth document,the Postal department communication on 12.03.09 as tenth
document,W.P.No:11001/09 as eleventh document,the departmental enquiry
proceeding on 10.09.09 as twelfth document,the copy of the notary attested
power of Attorney document as thirteenth document,the copy of the Chief
Vigilance officer letter No:179/CVO/NLC/2014 Dated:04.02.14 as fourteenth
document submitted in the attachment.
7. My husband obeyed the order of this Hon’ble Court and joined duty at
Rajasthan Barshingsar Project and submitted representation to consider for
Promotion, regularisation of Period through Proper Channel on 10.09.09
through the departmental enquiry officer against the illegal charge memo
No:7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated:11.11.2008 for not joining duty at
Rajasthan
8. The enquiry officer submitted report on 16.09.09 and my husband
submitted denied report on 22.10.09 to the enquiry officer. I am the witness to
my husband Disciplinary case on my husband side. As I got chest pain as the
my husband joined his duty at Rajasthan and admitted in the Neyveli Lignite
Corporation Hospital ,I was not able to attend enquiry at Rajasthan Barshingsar
Project for the 2nd time. I attended enquiry on 6th and 8th at Barshingsar Project
along with my husband. As the management has not provided the documents on
that day the enquiry was adjourned. In the mean time the state Vigilance
Department has closed the FIRNo: 10/03 by passing G.O.No:203 Dated:
03.11.09 subsequent Govt Lr.No:13.10.08 and action dropped 01.12.10.
9. The management has inordinately delayed to pass an order and
issued show cause notice in Lr.No:5801/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2010 Dated:
06.01.11 by the General Manager, the Disciplinary Authority received by my
husband on 10.01.11. The General Manager is inordinately delayed the case
22.10.09 and caused the possibility of getting promotion in two DPC. My
husband submitted denied statement on 18.01.11 to the General Manager, the
Disciplinary Authority. The General Manager, the Disciplinary Authority
passed an order in O.O.No:6071/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2011 Dated: 02.02.11.My
husband denied the statement and appeal submitted to the Project head, the
Appellate Authority on 07.02.2011.The Appellate authority, the Project head
passed an order in Lr.No:6354/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2011 received on
25.02.11.My husband rejoined his duty at Neyveli on 23.09.11on his
completion of service at Rajasthan Barshingsar Project. The case filed before
the Hon’ble High Court to quash the impugned proceeding No: Lr.No: CORP/
P&A/EE/0502/2008 Dated: 15.09.08 and subsequent Memo No:
7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 is posted before the Hon’ble
High Court for admission on 10.02.12 and the NLC advocates received the
notice and subsequently dismissed as infrutous on 13.02.12. Subsequently the
case is filed by me on 07.10.2012 is posted for admission for maintainability on
30.03.15 in WPSRNo:117221 and 117222 under Prerogative Writ. I submitted
miscellaneous petition to amend the prayer on 30.03.15 and listed on 29.04.15
to recover the loss to the Government money. The Hon’ble Justice advised to
separate petition for my husband. Hence Writ Appeal is filed in
W.P.No:11001/09 and the Writ petition is filed to quash the subsequent Memo
No: 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 and rating awarded to my
husband as “good “instead of “outstanding”. As per Supreme Court five bench
Judgement any entry except “outstanding” rating has to be communicated to the
employee to improve his performance. No communication has received by my
husband . I submitted fifteen pages of 1st typed set and the additional typed set
of one hundred and three pages submitted before this Hon’ble High Court and
the Hon’ble Apex Court Judgement of Civil Appeal No: 7631/2002. The
employees ACR are graded as 1) Out standing 2) Very good 3) Good 4) Fair
&5) Satisfactory. Except “out standing” entry other entries has to be
communicated to the individual to improve their performance.
10. I submitted two compliants on 27.05.12 to the Chief Vigilance officer,
Neyveli Lignite Corporation against Thiru.Ananthakrishnan and
Thiru.Natarajan to get back our property at Pondy and Valasaravakkam. The
Chief Vigilance officer passed final order on 03.03.15. I am very disappointed
about the order passed by the Chief Vigilance officer,Neyveli Lignite
Corporation and we have not yet get back our property. The inordinate delay
from 27.05.12 to 03.03.15 in finalising the cases causes undue harassment to me
and also to my husband in many ways. As per the Central Vigilance
Commission Manual any disciplinary proceedings has to be completed within
six months period of time.
11. In order to attend enquiry and to submit documents against
Thiru.Ananthakrishnan and Thiru.Natarajan I faced so many difficulties and
threatening in many ways in the result management has reduced the rating of
my husband as “Good”.I submitted compliants against to get back our
property.My husband sumbmitted an application to correct the rating of my
husband as “Outstanding”.As per Supreme Court Judgement Civil Appeal
7631/2002 the rating except outstanding entry has to be communicated to the
individual to improve their performance.As my husband was not communicated
from the management the ACR entry should be outstanding”.I herewith submit
the representation dated:18.10.2014 and 19.03.15 to the management as
fifteenth and sixteenth document submitted in the attachment. As the
management has transferred my husband to Rajasthan Barshingsar Project as
he is outstanding than 416 available Engineer.Hence the management may
please to fix his seniority before 416 Engineers. Hence I submitted a
representation to the Chief Vigilance officer and Chairman-Cum-Managing
Director of NLC on 11.02.15 which was forwaded to you in
Lr.No:VIG/NLC/CTS/AA/0025/2015 Dated:03.03.15.I herewith submit the
copy of my letter dated:11.02.15 as seventeenth,
Lr.No:VIG/NLC/CTS/AA/0025/2015 dated:03.03.15 as eighteenth,rating
display in the internet as nineteenth,Vigilance department letter
GM/VIG/DCE/2015 Dated:03.03.15 as twentieth ,DGM(P&A)Lr.No:CORP/
HR/EB(Exec)/ 517/CM/2014-1 Dt:12.04.15, as twenty first, CVO,NLC,Neyveli
Cir.No.CORP/HR/DA/ 1643/2015 Dt:15.04.15 twenty second document and
Civil Appeal the Supreme Court Judgement 7631/02 as twenty third document
in the attachment. The Chief Vigilance officer Circular clearly states that any
disciplinary proceedings have to be completed within six months.
12. As I am witness to state vigilance and NLC vigilance,my husband
suffered in getting due promotion, loss of pay and rating are affected. Hence, I
submit this representation along with the documents on behalf of my husband to
get Monetary benefits of Deputy General Manager from 19.08.09, the Date of
Joining at Rajasthan Barshingsar Project-Regularisation of period as duty As
the charge memo 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 issued is
illegal and inordinate delay as per central vigilance commission manual -ACR
Rating as “Out standing” as per Apex Court Judgement in Civil Appeal 7631/02
and consequential benefits-to Promote my husband as Deputy General Manager
or General Manager and thereby render justice.
Dated: 11.05.14 P.Chandira wife and Notary Attested Power of Attorney
Place: Panruti For R.Thangavel.
Attachments:
Twenty three documents as mentioned in the subject.
Apex Court Judgement of Civil Appeal 7631/02.
Copy humbly submitted to:
1)CMD,NLC,Neyveli 2)CVO,NLC,Neyveli

More Related Content

What's hot

ACCOUNTANT NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
ACCOUNTANT NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT ACCOUNTANT NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
ACCOUNTANT NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
Kanoon Ke Rakhwale India
 
Lokpal 2
Lokpal 2Lokpal 2
Lokpal 2
skbabbar
 
Const.Petition on the matter of selection or recruitment
Const.Petition on the matter of selection or recruitmentConst.Petition on the matter of selection or recruitment
Const.Petition on the matter of selection or recruitment
Mohammed Hanif memon
 
Demo deck truckee
Demo deck truckeeDemo deck truckee
Demo deck truckee
OpenCounter
 
Annual report-2015 Regent (Spine)
Annual report-2015 Regent (Spine)Annual report-2015 Regent (Spine)
Annual report-2015 Regent (Spine)
Deependra Singh Majawat
 
Challenges Encountered with Indonesia’s Rules and Requirements for Terminatio...
Challenges Encountered with Indonesia’s Rules and Requirements for Terminatio...Challenges Encountered with Indonesia’s Rules and Requirements for Terminatio...
Challenges Encountered with Indonesia’s Rules and Requirements for Terminatio...
legalPadmin
 
Cr.WJC No.1238 of 2019(Token no. 45078 of 2019) before Patna High Court dated...
Cr.WJC No.1238 of 2019(Token no. 45078 of 2019) before Patna High Court dated...Cr.WJC No.1238 of 2019(Token no. 45078 of 2019) before Patna High Court dated...
Cr.WJC No.1238 of 2019(Token no. 45078 of 2019) before Patna High Court dated...
Om Prakash Poddar
 
29.10.2019 ft monitoring bench
29.10.2019 ft monitoring bench29.10.2019 ft monitoring bench
29.10.2019 ft monitoring bench
sabrangsabrang
 
Form11 (New Sept 2016)
Form11 (New Sept 2016)Form11 (New Sept 2016)
Form11 (New Sept 2016)
Nagesh More
 

What's hot (9)

ACCOUNTANT NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
ACCOUNTANT NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT ACCOUNTANT NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
ACCOUNTANT NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
 
Lokpal 2
Lokpal 2Lokpal 2
Lokpal 2
 
Const.Petition on the matter of selection or recruitment
Const.Petition on the matter of selection or recruitmentConst.Petition on the matter of selection or recruitment
Const.Petition on the matter of selection or recruitment
 
Demo deck truckee
Demo deck truckeeDemo deck truckee
Demo deck truckee
 
Annual report-2015 Regent (Spine)
Annual report-2015 Regent (Spine)Annual report-2015 Regent (Spine)
Annual report-2015 Regent (Spine)
 
Challenges Encountered with Indonesia’s Rules and Requirements for Terminatio...
Challenges Encountered with Indonesia’s Rules and Requirements for Terminatio...Challenges Encountered with Indonesia’s Rules and Requirements for Terminatio...
Challenges Encountered with Indonesia’s Rules and Requirements for Terminatio...
 
Cr.WJC No.1238 of 2019(Token no. 45078 of 2019) before Patna High Court dated...
Cr.WJC No.1238 of 2019(Token no. 45078 of 2019) before Patna High Court dated...Cr.WJC No.1238 of 2019(Token no. 45078 of 2019) before Patna High Court dated...
Cr.WJC No.1238 of 2019(Token no. 45078 of 2019) before Patna High Court dated...
 
29.10.2019 ft monitoring bench
29.10.2019 ft monitoring bench29.10.2019 ft monitoring bench
29.10.2019 ft monitoring bench
 
Form11 (New Sept 2016)
Form11 (New Sept 2016)Form11 (New Sept 2016)
Form11 (New Sept 2016)
 

Viewers also liked

Exploded drawing
Exploded drawingExploded drawing
Exploded drawing
stuartwoodhall
 
Exploded Views
Exploded ViewsExploded Views
Exploded Views
dean dundas
 
Drawing exploded & sectional detail
Drawing exploded & sectional detailDrawing exploded & sectional detail
Drawing exploded & sectional detail
Shar Shar
 
Exploded drawings and developments
Exploded drawings and developmentsExploded drawings and developments
Exploded drawings and developments
Javier Gómez
 
Exploded drawing
Exploded drawingExploded drawing
Exploded drawing
stuartwoodhall
 
Isometric views
Isometric viewsIsometric views
Isometric views
Surashmie Kaalmegh
 
projection of Sectional view-engineering drawing b.tech
projection of Sectional view-engineering drawing b.techprojection of Sectional view-engineering drawing b.tech
projection of Sectional view-engineering drawing b.tech
Mohd Mujahid Nasir
 
Exploded Views
Exploded ViewsExploded Views
Exploded Views
Bruce Coulter
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Exploded drawing
Exploded drawingExploded drawing
Exploded drawing
 
Exploded Views
Exploded ViewsExploded Views
Exploded Views
 
Drawing exploded & sectional detail
Drawing exploded & sectional detailDrawing exploded & sectional detail
Drawing exploded & sectional detail
 
Exploded drawings and developments
Exploded drawings and developmentsExploded drawings and developments
Exploded drawings and developments
 
Exploded drawing
Exploded drawingExploded drawing
Exploded drawing
 
Isometric views
Isometric viewsIsometric views
Isometric views
 
projection of Sectional view-engineering drawing b.tech
projection of Sectional view-engineering drawing b.techprojection of Sectional view-engineering drawing b.tech
projection of Sectional view-engineering drawing b.tech
 
Exploded Views
Exploded ViewsExploded Views
Exploded Views
 

Similar to regularisation of period-2

stay
staystay
Mamma Affidavit to correct rating and regularisation of period
Mamma Affidavit to correct rating and regularisation of periodMamma Affidavit to correct rating and regularisation of period
Mamma Affidavit to correct rating and regularisation of period
chandira thangavel
 
Judgement dated 170415
Judgement dated 170415Judgement dated 170415
Judgement dated 170415
chandira thangavel
 
Most important judgement for filing of form GST TRAN-1
Most important judgement for filing of form GST TRAN-1Most important judgement for filing of form GST TRAN-1
Most important judgement for filing of form GST TRAN-1
CA PRADEEP GOYAL
 
6002
60026002
3 @ SERVICE TAX ST2
3 @ SERVICE TAX ST23 @ SERVICE TAX ST2
3 @ SERVICE TAX ST2
indresh kusawah
 
CITATION
CITATIONCITATION
Sanjiv bhatt order
Sanjiv bhatt orderSanjiv bhatt order
Sanjiv bhatt order
sabrangsabrang
 
BSNL Rule 8 Mutual Transfer form offline
BSNL Rule 8 Mutual Transfer form offlineBSNL Rule 8 Mutual Transfer form offline
BSNL Rule 8 Mutual Transfer form offline
praneshworisinam27
 
online.icai.org_frmreport
online.icai.org_frmreportonline.icai.org_frmreport
online.icai.org_frmreport
Alkesh Kasliwal
 
523 Sahu
523 Sahu523 Sahu
523 Sahu
Veerendra Sahu
 
Final status of PMOPG/E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Final status of PMOPG/E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018Final status of PMOPG/E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Final status of PMOPG/E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Om Prakash Poddar
 
promotion judgemnet of Revenue department staff_welfare_vs_the_state_of_kerala
promotion judgemnet of Revenue department staff_welfare_vs_the_state_of_keralapromotion judgemnet of Revenue department staff_welfare_vs_the_state_of_kerala
promotion judgemnet of Revenue department staff_welfare_vs_the_state_of_kerala
shanavas chithara
 
reply to counter in Crl.O.P.No6002
reply to counter in Crl.O.P.No6002reply to counter in Crl.O.P.No6002
reply to counter in Crl.O.P.No6002
chandira thangavel
 
Ft monitoring bench 26 nov 19 order
Ft monitoring bench 26 nov 19 orderFt monitoring bench 26 nov 19 order
Ft monitoring bench 26 nov 19 order
sabrangsabrang
 
SERVICE TAX ST-2
SERVICE TAX ST-2SERVICE TAX ST-2
SERVICE TAX ST-2
Md.Motachhimbilla Mondal.
 

Similar to regularisation of period-2 (16)

stay
staystay
stay
 
Mamma Affidavit to correct rating and regularisation of period
Mamma Affidavit to correct rating and regularisation of periodMamma Affidavit to correct rating and regularisation of period
Mamma Affidavit to correct rating and regularisation of period
 
Judgement dated 170415
Judgement dated 170415Judgement dated 170415
Judgement dated 170415
 
Most important judgement for filing of form GST TRAN-1
Most important judgement for filing of form GST TRAN-1Most important judgement for filing of form GST TRAN-1
Most important judgement for filing of form GST TRAN-1
 
6002
60026002
6002
 
3 @ SERVICE TAX ST2
3 @ SERVICE TAX ST23 @ SERVICE TAX ST2
3 @ SERVICE TAX ST2
 
CITATION
CITATIONCITATION
CITATION
 
Sanjiv bhatt order
Sanjiv bhatt orderSanjiv bhatt order
Sanjiv bhatt order
 
BSNL Rule 8 Mutual Transfer form offline
BSNL Rule 8 Mutual Transfer form offlineBSNL Rule 8 Mutual Transfer form offline
BSNL Rule 8 Mutual Transfer form offline
 
online.icai.org_frmreport
online.icai.org_frmreportonline.icai.org_frmreport
online.icai.org_frmreport
 
523 Sahu
523 Sahu523 Sahu
523 Sahu
 
Final status of PMOPG/E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Final status of PMOPG/E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018Final status of PMOPG/E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
Final status of PMOPG/E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018
 
promotion judgemnet of Revenue department staff_welfare_vs_the_state_of_kerala
promotion judgemnet of Revenue department staff_welfare_vs_the_state_of_keralapromotion judgemnet of Revenue department staff_welfare_vs_the_state_of_kerala
promotion judgemnet of Revenue department staff_welfare_vs_the_state_of_kerala
 
reply to counter in Crl.O.P.No6002
reply to counter in Crl.O.P.No6002reply to counter in Crl.O.P.No6002
reply to counter in Crl.O.P.No6002
 
Ft monitoring bench 26 nov 19 order
Ft monitoring bench 26 nov 19 orderFt monitoring bench 26 nov 19 order
Ft monitoring bench 26 nov 19 order
 
SERVICE TAX ST-2
SERVICE TAX ST-2SERVICE TAX ST-2
SERVICE TAX ST-2
 

More from chandira thangavel

power
powerpower
Affidavit pattappan
Affidavit pattappanAffidavit pattappan
Affidavit pattappan
chandira thangavel
 
From
FromFrom
Writ Petition pondy
Writ Petition pondyWrit Petition pondy
Writ Petition pondy
chandira thangavel
 
bhavani
bhavanibhavani
1152
11521152
25115
2511525115
2b petition in pondy affidavit
2b petition in pondy affidavit2b petition in pondy affidavit
2b petition in pondy affidavit
chandira thangavel
 
CRLOPSR15141
CRLOPSR15141CRLOPSR15141
CRLOPSR15141
chandira thangavel
 
compliant against natarajan and ananthakrishnan
compliant against natarajan and ananthakrishnancompliant against natarajan and ananthakrishnan
compliant against natarajan and ananthakrishnan
chandira thangavel
 
agreement dated 02.11.99
agreement dated 02.11.99agreement dated 02.11.99
agreement dated 02.11.99
chandira thangavel
 
CHANDRA-2B-1 (1)
CHANDRA-2B-1 (1)CHANDRA-2B-1 (1)
CHANDRA-2B-1 (1)
chandira thangavel
 
REGISTERED POST WITH ACK DUE (2)
REGISTERED POST WITH ACK DUE (2)REGISTERED POST WITH ACK DUE (2)
REGISTERED POST WITH ACK DUE (2)
chandira thangavel
 
NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LIMITED
NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LIMITEDNEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LIMITED
NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LIMITED
chandira thangavel
 
Dev_Dutt (1)
Dev_Dutt (1)Dev_Dutt (1)
Dev_Dutt (1)
chandira thangavel
 
PROPFORMA FOR PADMA AWARD
PROPFORMA FOR PADMA AWARDPROPFORMA FOR PADMA AWARD
PROPFORMA FOR PADMA AWARD
chandira thangavel
 

More from chandira thangavel (16)

power
powerpower
power
 
Affidavit pattappan
Affidavit pattappanAffidavit pattappan
Affidavit pattappan
 
From
FromFrom
From
 
Writ Petition pondy
Writ Petition pondyWrit Petition pondy
Writ Petition pondy
 
bhavani
bhavanibhavani
bhavani
 
1152
11521152
1152
 
25115
2511525115
25115
 
2b petition in pondy affidavit
2b petition in pondy affidavit2b petition in pondy affidavit
2b petition in pondy affidavit
 
CRLOPSR15141
CRLOPSR15141CRLOPSR15141
CRLOPSR15141
 
compliant against natarajan and ananthakrishnan
compliant against natarajan and ananthakrishnancompliant against natarajan and ananthakrishnan
compliant against natarajan and ananthakrishnan
 
agreement dated 02.11.99
agreement dated 02.11.99agreement dated 02.11.99
agreement dated 02.11.99
 
CHANDRA-2B-1 (1)
CHANDRA-2B-1 (1)CHANDRA-2B-1 (1)
CHANDRA-2B-1 (1)
 
REGISTERED POST WITH ACK DUE (2)
REGISTERED POST WITH ACK DUE (2)REGISTERED POST WITH ACK DUE (2)
REGISTERED POST WITH ACK DUE (2)
 
NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LIMITED
NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LIMITEDNEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LIMITED
NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LIMITED
 
Dev_Dutt (1)
Dev_Dutt (1)Dev_Dutt (1)
Dev_Dutt (1)
 
PROPFORMA FOR PADMA AWARD
PROPFORMA FOR PADMA AWARDPROPFORMA FOR PADMA AWARD
PROPFORMA FOR PADMA AWARD
 

regularisation of period-2

  • 1. From R.Thangavel,M.E., Represented by his wife and Power of Attorney, The Chief Manager, TPS-I, CPFNo:27329, NLC,Neyveli- 3, Cuddalore District. To The Director (HR), Neyveli Lignite Corporation, Neyveli. Respected Sir, Sub: Monetary benefits of Deputy General Manager from 19.08.09, the Date of Joining at Rajasthan Barshingsar Project-Regularisation of period as duty As the charge memo 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 issued is illegal and inordinate delay as per central vigilance commission manual -ACR Rating as “Out standing” as per Apex Court Judgement in Civil Appeal 7631/02 and consequential benefits-to Promote as Deputy General Manager or General Manager-Reg. Ref: 1) Lr.No:5617/P&A II-4/91-22 by DGM (P&A), NLC. Dated:22.08.91. 2) Corp/P&A/502/355/08-28 DGM (P&A), NLC, Neyveli Dt:02.04.08 3) NLC CPIO Lr.No:PRD/CPIO/0062/2008-6 Dt: 08.07.08 4) W.P.No:17124/08. Dated:01.09.08 5) Lr.No: CORP/CGM/P&A/EE/0502/2008 Dated: 15.09.08 6) Review No: 103/08 without any order in M.P.No:1/08.Dt:24.09.08 7) Representation to CMD on 24.12.08 8) 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08
  • 2. 9) WASRNo: 15515/09 Dated: 04.03.09 10) PostalDepartment communication Dated: 12.03.09 11) 2b Petition dated: 27.05.09 12) WPNo: 11001/09 Dated: 24.06.09 13) Substituted order in W.P.No:17124/08 Dated:02.07.09 14) 2nd Substituted order in W.P.No:17124/08 Dated: 07.08.09 15) Disciplinary enquiry Dated: 10.09.09 16) Enquiry officer ReportDated: 16.09.09 17) Denied Reportby me Dated: 22.10.09. 18) Show cause notice Dated: 06.01.11 by G.M, Disciplinary Authority,Barsginsar in O.ONo:5801/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2011 on 10.01.11 19) Denied Reportby me Dated: 18.01.11. 20)Order Dated: 02.02.11 by G.M,Disciplinary Authority, Barsginsar in O.ONo:6071/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2011. 21) Appeal to Project head, the Appellate Authority on 07.02.11 22) Order Dated: 22.02.11 by the Project head, the Appelate Authority, Barsginsar in O.ONo:6354/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2011 on 25.02.11. 23) Joined duty back to Neyveli on 23.09.11. 24)Appeal in Rating to Unit Head,Neyveli on 18.10.14 &19.03.15 25) Supreme Court Judgement Civil Appeal 7631/02. 26)Lr submitted to CMD,NLC &CVO,NLC to fix the seniority on 11.02.15. 27) Vigilance Department &CMD,NLC forwaded Director (HR)for necessary action on 03.03.15. 28) DGM(P&A)Lr.No:CORP/HR/EB(Exec)/517/CM/2014-1 Dt:12.04.15 29) The CVO,NLC,Neyveli Cir.No.CORP/HR/DA/1643/2015 Dt:15.04.15
  • 3. 1. I, P. Chandira, wife of R. Thangavel,CPFNo:27329, who is working as Chief Manager in Neyveli Lignite Corporation sincerely submits this letter before the esteemed Neyveli Lignite Corporation on behalf of my husband as Notary attested power of Attorney. 2. My husband Shri.R.Thangavel’s CPF No is 27329 and he joined in Neyveli Lignite Corporation on 15.11.83. The board of directors conducted an interview for selecting the candidate on their outstanding ability for Rajasthan Barshingsar Project in the year of 1991. My husband Shri.R.Thangavel was selected and the management has passed an order in Lr.No:5617/P&A II-4/91- 22 by DGM (P&A), NLC. Dated: 22.08.91 with monetary benefits of Next higher grade. I herewith submit the copy of the letter as first document in the attachment. As my husband asked job for me in the year 1991,the management not instructed my husband to join at Rajasthan Project. 3. I am working as an Assistant Engineer in Tamilnadu Highways Department from 25.01.98. When I was working as an Assistant Engineer in Highways Department I was forced to do illegal activities punishable under Indian Penal Codes. Hence I proceeded legally in O.A.No:2113/01 and subsequently faced W.P.No:26463/01 and got orders in W.P.No:26463/01 Dated: 04.03.02, 14.03.02, 23.04.03 and 24.06.03. I am witness to Tamilnadu State Vigilance in FIRNo:10/03 filed by the Inspector of Police,V&AC,Cuddalore on 10.11.03. The inordinate delay in finalising the case and to permit the accused to escape from clutches of law. Due to the inordinate delay myself and my husband was harassed in many ways and still the loss to the Government money has not recovered. 4. When we have planned to purchase an apartment in Pondicherry through Thiru.Natarajan and Thiru.Ananthakrishnan in Pondicherry on 13.03.08.The General Manager,TPS-I counselled Thiru.Rao and Thiru.Ananthakrishnan for Rajasthan Transfer in the year of 2008 which was
  • 4. clearly explained in WANo:282/09 before Chennai High Court. Thiru.Natarajan and Thiru.Ananthakrishnan planned to construct Pondicherry building in violation of PPA Rules and Regulations. Thiru.Rao joined duty and Thiru.Ananthakrishnan name was replaced with my husband in the year of 2008 in Corp/P&A/502/355/08-28 DGM (P&A), NLC, Neyveli Dt: 02.04.08. The central public information officer in his letter dated:08.07.08 stated that my husband is outstanding, talented and well experienced candidate need for Project Site. I herewith submit the copy of the letter as second document in the attachment.When there are 416 outstanding candidate was available in Mechanical Discipline, the management transferred my husband. Hence it is necessary to fix the seniority before 416 Engineers. Subsequently we have planned to purchase an apartment in Valasaravakkam,Chennai through Thiru.Natarajan on 14.05.08. The management has passed an extension on 22.05.08 up to 14.07.08. I herewith submit the copy of the seniority list received through Right to Information Act as third document in the attachment. As I am witness to Tamilnadu Vigilance Department I faced life threatening hence myself and husband submitted a letter to the management to main the “status quo”of the order until FIRNo:10/03 is pending on 11.07.08.The copy of the letters are submitted as fourth and fifth document in Attachment. 5. CGM(P&A) passed a proceeding No: CORP/ P&A/EE/0502/2008 Dated: 15.09.08 based upon the order of W.P.No:17124/08 Dated: 01.09.08, when the Miscellaneous Petition in Review No: 103/08 in W.P.No:17124/08 was pending. The management has not considered the same. The Hon’ble High Court substituted the Order in W.P.No:17124/08 on 02.07.09 and subsequently substituted on 07.08.09. When the Hon’ble High Court substituted the order dated: 01.09.08 on 02.07.09 &07.08.09 the any proceedings initiated by the management based upon the order of W.P.No:17124/08 is impugned proceeding No: Lr.No: CORP/ P&A/EE/0502/2008 Dated: 15.09.08 and Memo No: 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 is illegal and null and void.
  • 5. Even though illegal charge memo created against the 2nd petitioner, he denied the charges and attended enquiries, the departmental enquiry officer and presenting officer closed the enquiry on 10.09.09 and the management ready to provide the post of Deputy General Manager post and to regularise the period as duty.The order in W.P.No:17124/08 as submitted as sixth document, CGM(P&A)Lr.No:CORP/P&A/EE/0502/2008 Dated:15.09.08 as seventh document, Memo No: 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 as eight document in the attachment. 6. Even though my husband received order in WPSRNo: 15155/09 on 04.03.09 before the Division bench and directed the CMD to consider my husband’s representation dated: 24.12.08. As per the representation submitted to the CMD, my husband is eligible get monetary benefits of Deputy General Manager with effect from 19.08.09. The Hon’ble High Court passed an order on 18.03.09 to join duty and submit his grievance to the management. The management has followed a procedure by conducting interview for the selection of outstanding candidates for Rajasthan Barshingsar Project in the year of 1991 with next higher grade benefit in DGM(P&A) Lr.No:5617/P&A II-4/91-22 Dated:22.08.91.My husband was transferred from ACM and hence he is eligible to get monetary benefits of DGM the next higher grade as the Chief Manager and ACM scale of pay is the same. Hence my husband is eligible for monetary benefits for Deputy General Manager grade from 19.08.09. Even though the charges issued are illegal to my husband he attended the departmental enquiry and the enquiry officer and the presenting officer closed the enquiry proceedings on 10.09.09 with the acceptance to grant Deputy General Manager Promotion with effect from 19.08.09 and regularisation of Period as duty. If they have not accepted to grant DGM Promotion and regularisation of period they must have given “reasonable opportunity in accordance with Principles of Natural Justice” provided the requested documents on 06.06.09 and 08.06.09 at Rajasthan Barshingsar Project. The copy of the order WASRNo: 15515/09 as
  • 6. ninth document,the Postal department communication on 12.03.09 as tenth document,W.P.No:11001/09 as eleventh document,the departmental enquiry proceeding on 10.09.09 as twelfth document,the copy of the notary attested power of Attorney document as thirteenth document,the copy of the Chief Vigilance officer letter No:179/CVO/NLC/2014 Dated:04.02.14 as fourteenth document submitted in the attachment. 7. My husband obeyed the order of this Hon’ble Court and joined duty at Rajasthan Barshingsar Project and submitted representation to consider for Promotion, regularisation of Period through Proper Channel on 10.09.09 through the departmental enquiry officer against the illegal charge memo No:7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated:11.11.2008 for not joining duty at Rajasthan 8. The enquiry officer submitted report on 16.09.09 and my husband submitted denied report on 22.10.09 to the enquiry officer. I am the witness to my husband Disciplinary case on my husband side. As I got chest pain as the my husband joined his duty at Rajasthan and admitted in the Neyveli Lignite Corporation Hospital ,I was not able to attend enquiry at Rajasthan Barshingsar Project for the 2nd time. I attended enquiry on 6th and 8th at Barshingsar Project along with my husband. As the management has not provided the documents on that day the enquiry was adjourned. In the mean time the state Vigilance Department has closed the FIRNo: 10/03 by passing G.O.No:203 Dated: 03.11.09 subsequent Govt Lr.No:13.10.08 and action dropped 01.12.10. 9. The management has inordinately delayed to pass an order and issued show cause notice in Lr.No:5801/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2010 Dated: 06.01.11 by the General Manager, the Disciplinary Authority received by my husband on 10.01.11. The General Manager is inordinately delayed the case 22.10.09 and caused the possibility of getting promotion in two DPC. My
  • 7. husband submitted denied statement on 18.01.11 to the General Manager, the Disciplinary Authority. The General Manager, the Disciplinary Authority passed an order in O.O.No:6071/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2011 Dated: 02.02.11.My husband denied the statement and appeal submitted to the Project head, the Appellate Authority on 07.02.2011.The Appellate authority, the Project head passed an order in Lr.No:6354/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2011 received on 25.02.11.My husband rejoined his duty at Neyveli on 23.09.11on his completion of service at Rajasthan Barshingsar Project. The case filed before the Hon’ble High Court to quash the impugned proceeding No: Lr.No: CORP/ P&A/EE/0502/2008 Dated: 15.09.08 and subsequent Memo No: 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 is posted before the Hon’ble High Court for admission on 10.02.12 and the NLC advocates received the notice and subsequently dismissed as infrutous on 13.02.12. Subsequently the case is filed by me on 07.10.2012 is posted for admission for maintainability on 30.03.15 in WPSRNo:117221 and 117222 under Prerogative Writ. I submitted miscellaneous petition to amend the prayer on 30.03.15 and listed on 29.04.15 to recover the loss to the Government money. The Hon’ble Justice advised to separate petition for my husband. Hence Writ Appeal is filed in W.P.No:11001/09 and the Writ petition is filed to quash the subsequent Memo No: 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 and rating awarded to my husband as “good “instead of “outstanding”. As per Supreme Court five bench Judgement any entry except “outstanding” rating has to be communicated to the employee to improve his performance. No communication has received by my husband . I submitted fifteen pages of 1st typed set and the additional typed set of one hundred and three pages submitted before this Hon’ble High Court and the Hon’ble Apex Court Judgement of Civil Appeal No: 7631/2002. The employees ACR are graded as 1) Out standing 2) Very good 3) Good 4) Fair &5) Satisfactory. Except “out standing” entry other entries has to be communicated to the individual to improve their performance.
  • 8. 10. I submitted two compliants on 27.05.12 to the Chief Vigilance officer, Neyveli Lignite Corporation against Thiru.Ananthakrishnan and Thiru.Natarajan to get back our property at Pondy and Valasaravakkam. The Chief Vigilance officer passed final order on 03.03.15. I am very disappointed about the order passed by the Chief Vigilance officer,Neyveli Lignite Corporation and we have not yet get back our property. The inordinate delay from 27.05.12 to 03.03.15 in finalising the cases causes undue harassment to me and also to my husband in many ways. As per the Central Vigilance Commission Manual any disciplinary proceedings has to be completed within six months period of time. 11. In order to attend enquiry and to submit documents against Thiru.Ananthakrishnan and Thiru.Natarajan I faced so many difficulties and threatening in many ways in the result management has reduced the rating of my husband as “Good”.I submitted compliants against to get back our property.My husband sumbmitted an application to correct the rating of my husband as “Outstanding”.As per Supreme Court Judgement Civil Appeal 7631/2002 the rating except outstanding entry has to be communicated to the individual to improve their performance.As my husband was not communicated from the management the ACR entry should be outstanding”.I herewith submit the representation dated:18.10.2014 and 19.03.15 to the management as fifteenth and sixteenth document submitted in the attachment. As the management has transferred my husband to Rajasthan Barshingsar Project as he is outstanding than 416 available Engineer.Hence the management may please to fix his seniority before 416 Engineers. Hence I submitted a representation to the Chief Vigilance officer and Chairman-Cum-Managing Director of NLC on 11.02.15 which was forwaded to you in Lr.No:VIG/NLC/CTS/AA/0025/2015 Dated:03.03.15.I herewith submit the copy of my letter dated:11.02.15 as seventeenth, Lr.No:VIG/NLC/CTS/AA/0025/2015 dated:03.03.15 as eighteenth,rating
  • 9. display in the internet as nineteenth,Vigilance department letter GM/VIG/DCE/2015 Dated:03.03.15 as twentieth ,DGM(P&A)Lr.No:CORP/ HR/EB(Exec)/ 517/CM/2014-1 Dt:12.04.15, as twenty first, CVO,NLC,Neyveli Cir.No.CORP/HR/DA/ 1643/2015 Dt:15.04.15 twenty second document and Civil Appeal the Supreme Court Judgement 7631/02 as twenty third document in the attachment. The Chief Vigilance officer Circular clearly states that any disciplinary proceedings have to be completed within six months. 12. As I am witness to state vigilance and NLC vigilance,my husband suffered in getting due promotion, loss of pay and rating are affected. Hence, I submit this representation along with the documents on behalf of my husband to get Monetary benefits of Deputy General Manager from 19.08.09, the Date of Joining at Rajasthan Barshingsar Project-Regularisation of period as duty As the charge memo 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 issued is illegal and inordinate delay as per central vigilance commission manual -ACR Rating as “Out standing” as per Apex Court Judgement in Civil Appeal 7631/02 and consequential benefits-to Promote my husband as Deputy General Manager or General Manager and thereby render justice. Dated: 11.05.14 P.Chandira wife and Notary Attested Power of Attorney Place: Panruti For R.Thangavel. Attachments: Twenty three documents as mentioned in the subject. Apex Court Judgement of Civil Appeal 7631/02. Copy humbly submitted to: 1)CMD,NLC,Neyveli 2)CVO,NLC,Neyveli