1. The document is a letter from R. Thangavel's wife requesting monetary benefits and promotion to Deputy General Manager based on his outstanding performance and selection for a project in 1991.
2. It details Thangavel's career history in NLC since 1983 and argues the charge memo and delays in his case were illegal.
3. The letter references many legal documents and court orders, and requests his period of service be regularized and he receive benefits due based on a Supreme Court order on performance ratings.
1) P. Chandira and R. Thangavel have filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Chennai seeking various reliefs regarding their employment at Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC).
2) They are seeking to quash certain proceedings against R. Thangavel regarding his transfer and disciplinary action. They are also seeking fixation of R. Thangavel's seniority and monetary benefits.
3) They allege harassment, victimization, and delay in various proceedings by NLC authorities. They pray that they be allowed to jointly file a single writ petition to address their grievances.
"TAPAS BANERJEE EX- MAYOR ASANSOL EXPOSED".revealsasansol
See the details of malpractice & embezzlement of Central Govt., State Govt. & Municipal Funds by the Ex-Mayor, Sri Tapas Banerjee and his 2 (two) old friends & close associates i.e. Sri Rabiul Islam, M.I.C. & Sri Amar Nath Chatterjee, Ex-Deputy Mayor of A.M.C. and Ex-Chairman A.M.C. Jitender Tiwari.
Kindly follow the above Documents for further information.
The State Procurement Office reviewed 13 contracts for auditing services between various state departments and private firms from FY 2007 to FY 2012 at the request of the Senate President and House Speaker. The review found that the Office of the Auditor inadvertently failed to obtain required procurement delegation authority for contracts over $50,000/$100,000. The SPO recommends approving the violations since corrective actions have been taken to prevent future issues and ensure compliance with procurement rules.
This document provides the agenda and background information for an upcoming Ethics Commission meeting. The agenda includes confirming future meeting dates, discussing complaint statistics and the commission's move to a new office space. It also addresses options for continuing investigative services, performing staff evaluations, setting salary amounts and potential charter amendments regarding commission attorney salaries. The document outlines various issues and requests for the commission to consider or take action on at their meeting.
The document summarizes the key details regarding the Haryana State Legal Services Authority as established under the Legal Services Authorities Act of 1987. It provides an overview of the constitutional basis for free legal aid in India, the formation and objectives of the Authority, and details the composition and functions of the State Authority body, District Authorities, and Sub-Divisional Committees. It also outlines the roles and responsibilities of the Authority's Patron-in-Chief, Executive Chairman, Member Secretary, and the types of free legal services provided to eligible citizens of Haryana.
Since the last fifteen years, Kuwer has been a leading name in the complex field of Holographic Films/ Holographic Paper, Window metallised/ De-metallised films, coatedlacquered films and allied products. At Kuwer we are constantly striving to achieve higher goals and have been adding new machinery and developing new products/ applications with the aim of meeting the ever-changing needs of the discerning customer. With a team of dedicated qualified professionals and Total Quality Management, we are able to deliver the right product to ensure total customer satisfaction.
28-0050 Admin Leave To Govt. Employees Members Of Brds. And CommissionsGenevieve Whitaker
Sponsors: Patrick Simeon-Sprauve
Subject: An Act amending Title 3 Virgin Islands Code, Chapter 5 to grant administrative leave to government employees who are members of boards and commissions to attend boards and commissions meetingS
ORPS Act, 2012 in Odisha is based on Citizens' Right to Charter in various Departments of State Government and having Provisions for Appellate and Revisional Authorities to redress the Grievances of Citizens
1) P. Chandira and R. Thangavel have filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Chennai seeking various reliefs regarding their employment at Neyveli Lignite Corporation (NLC).
2) They are seeking to quash certain proceedings against R. Thangavel regarding his transfer and disciplinary action. They are also seeking fixation of R. Thangavel's seniority and monetary benefits.
3) They allege harassment, victimization, and delay in various proceedings by NLC authorities. They pray that they be allowed to jointly file a single writ petition to address their grievances.
"TAPAS BANERJEE EX- MAYOR ASANSOL EXPOSED".revealsasansol
See the details of malpractice & embezzlement of Central Govt., State Govt. & Municipal Funds by the Ex-Mayor, Sri Tapas Banerjee and his 2 (two) old friends & close associates i.e. Sri Rabiul Islam, M.I.C. & Sri Amar Nath Chatterjee, Ex-Deputy Mayor of A.M.C. and Ex-Chairman A.M.C. Jitender Tiwari.
Kindly follow the above Documents for further information.
The State Procurement Office reviewed 13 contracts for auditing services between various state departments and private firms from FY 2007 to FY 2012 at the request of the Senate President and House Speaker. The review found that the Office of the Auditor inadvertently failed to obtain required procurement delegation authority for contracts over $50,000/$100,000. The SPO recommends approving the violations since corrective actions have been taken to prevent future issues and ensure compliance with procurement rules.
This document provides the agenda and background information for an upcoming Ethics Commission meeting. The agenda includes confirming future meeting dates, discussing complaint statistics and the commission's move to a new office space. It also addresses options for continuing investigative services, performing staff evaluations, setting salary amounts and potential charter amendments regarding commission attorney salaries. The document outlines various issues and requests for the commission to consider or take action on at their meeting.
The document summarizes the key details regarding the Haryana State Legal Services Authority as established under the Legal Services Authorities Act of 1987. It provides an overview of the constitutional basis for free legal aid in India, the formation and objectives of the Authority, and details the composition and functions of the State Authority body, District Authorities, and Sub-Divisional Committees. It also outlines the roles and responsibilities of the Authority's Patron-in-Chief, Executive Chairman, Member Secretary, and the types of free legal services provided to eligible citizens of Haryana.
Since the last fifteen years, Kuwer has been a leading name in the complex field of Holographic Films/ Holographic Paper, Window metallised/ De-metallised films, coatedlacquered films and allied products. At Kuwer we are constantly striving to achieve higher goals and have been adding new machinery and developing new products/ applications with the aim of meeting the ever-changing needs of the discerning customer. With a team of dedicated qualified professionals and Total Quality Management, we are able to deliver the right product to ensure total customer satisfaction.
28-0050 Admin Leave To Govt. Employees Members Of Brds. And CommissionsGenevieve Whitaker
Sponsors: Patrick Simeon-Sprauve
Subject: An Act amending Title 3 Virgin Islands Code, Chapter 5 to grant administrative leave to government employees who are members of boards and commissions to attend boards and commissions meetingS
ORPS Act, 2012 in Odisha is based on Citizens' Right to Charter in various Departments of State Government and having Provisions for Appellate and Revisional Authorities to redress the Grievances of Citizens
This document is a letter from Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), a Government of India enterprise, to heads of various BSNL administrative units. It forwards instructions from the Department of Personnel and Training regarding compliance with the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013. As per the Act, all public servants under BSNL must submit declarations of their assets and liabilities as of March 31st each year to competent authorities by July 31st. The letter instructs BSNL unit heads to ensure these declarations are uploaded to the company website by the deadline of September 15th.
The Supreme Court of Pakistan heard a petition regarding the promotion of civil servants from grade 20 to 21. The petitioner argued that promotions were not being given based on transparent, objective criteria, and instead were subject to political pressures. The court summarized that while several officers met qualifications for promotion, their cases were deferred without clear reasons. The court questioned whether deferrals were meant to favor other candidates rather than reward honest work. It ordered promotions be based solely on merit as outlined in previous court judgments.
The document outlines an agenda for a meeting that includes:
1) Introducing who the company is and who they are trying to help with their product
2) Demonstrating their product
3) Having a question and answer session
The document provides information about starting a business in Truckee, California, including the permit process, fees, and requirements for use permits and minor use permits, as well as an application for a temporary sign permit.
- The document is the annual report of Regent Enterprises Limited for the financial year 2014-15.
- It provides details of the board of directors, auditors, registrar and transfer agents, contents of the annual report including notice of the annual general meeting.
- The notice of annual general meeting provides details of the date, time and venue of the meeting and lists the ordinary and special businesses to be transacted, including adoption of financial statements, appointment of directors and auditors.
The court heard from various parties regarding issues related to the appointment and functioning of Foreigners Tribunals in Assam. It was reported that salaries would be released for newly appointed tribunal members within two weeks. Appointments and staffing of new tribunals would also be completed within two weeks. A two day orientation for newly recruited Assistant Government Pleaders was agreed upon. Consideration of an application for compassionate appointment was allowed to proceed. Further time was given to consider proposed amendments to tribunal rules and finalize complaint monitoring mechanisms. Developing procedures for tribunal member issues and reporting on functioning was also discussed. The case was adjourned for further hearing in three weeks.
1. The document introduces a new Declaration Form (New Form No. 11) to replace the existing Form No. 11 for members of the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation who have a Universal Account Number and completed KYC verification.
2. The new form will also replace Form 13 for fund transfer requests where the member has a UAN.
3. Members with a UAN can now submit claims directly to EPFO without involving their employer by using the new online claim portal.
The document discusses exploded drawings and their advantages. It explains that an exploded drawing lays out the pieces of an object separated from each other to show how they fit together. This allows the viewer to understand how the object assembles and can help buyers and mechanics work with the object. The lesson aims to teach students how to set up an exploded drawing and identify three key advantages: showing how an object assembles, aiding the understanding of buyers and mechanics, and illustrating the assembly of complex objects.
An exploded view drawing shows how objects are assembled by depicting the individual parts as if they have been separated but in their correct positions relative to one another. The document provides examples of exploded view drawings of a desk and trinket box that make clear the assembly process by illustrating each component and where it fits in relation to the others. Creating an exploded view involves redrawing the components of an object as if they have been blown apart while maintaining the accurate alignment of each part.
1. The document discusses exploded views and surface developments which are important for planning the construction of objects.
2. An exploded view is a drawing that shows all the individual pieces of an object. It includes the measurements of each piece to allow recreating the object with real materials.
3. A surface development shows an object fully unfolded with fold lines indicated. This is useful for objects made of materials that need to be folded, like cardboard.
The document discusses exploded drawings and their advantages. It explains that an exploded drawing lays out the pieces of an object separated from each other to show how they fit together. This allows the viewer to understand how the object assembles and can help buyers and mechanics work with the object. The lesson aims to teach students how to set up an exploded drawing and identify three key advantages: showing how an object assembles, aiding the understanding of buyers and mechanics, and illustrating the assembly of complex objects.
The document discusses assembly drawings and isometric views. It explains that assembly drawings show how parts of a product fit together, and can be drawn as fitted assemblies or exploded views. Exploded views separate the parts to show the correct assembly order. The document then provides rules for drawing isometric projections, including that vertical lines stay vertical and horizontal lines incline 30 degrees, all lines are foreshortened, non-isometric lines are drawn using two connecting isometric lines, and hidden edges are typically omitted.
projection of Sectional view-engineering drawing b.techMohd Mujahid Nasir
The document discusses sectional views, which show internal details of objects by cutting away portions. There are three main types of sectional views: full sectional views, which cut the object completely; half sectional views, which cut away half the object; and offset sectional views, which cut on an angle. Hatched lines are used to indicate cut-away areas. Dimension lines are not placed in hatched regions.
The document discusses exploded views and their use in understanding how objects are constructed from individual pieces. An exploded view drawings each piece of an object separately in its relative position, allowing one to see how the pieces fit together. The document provides examples of exploded views and instructions on drawing the views from component diagrams and vice versa. It also discusses constituent part diagrams, which similarly identify individual pieces but sketches them in 2D rather than separating them as in an exploded view.
This document is an affidavit filed in support of a writ petition before the Honorable High Court of Judicature at Chennai. It summarizes the career history and promotions of the 2nd petitioner from 1983 to 2013 within Neyveli Lignite Corporation. It details legal proceedings between the petitioners and NLC regarding the 2nd petitioner's transfer and non-promotion. The petitioners claim the actions of NLC were malicious and caused harassment. The petitioners seek orders directing NLC to submit reports, calling for relevant records, and regularizing the petitioners' periods of service with compensation.
Mamma Affidavit to correct rating and regularisation of periodchandira thangavel
This document is an affidavit filed in the Honorable High Court of Judicature at Chennai by P. Chandira (1st petitioner) on behalf of herself and her husband R. Thangavel (2nd petitioner). It summarizes the career history of the 2nd petitioner in Neyveli Lignite Corporation spanning over 30 years, details allegations of harassment and victimization faced by the petitioners, and lists 12 orders passed in previous legal proceedings that the petitioners are seeking relief from through this writ petition. The petitioners have prayed for the respondents to submit reports in the case and for records pertaining to the previous legal proceedings to be called for, in order to regularize the service period of the petitioners
1. The petitioner filed two criminal petitions seeking transfer of investigation into her complaints to other agencies like the Vigilance department or CBI, alleging a perfunctory investigation by the police.
2. The police counter stated that they summoned the petitioner and others for inquiry but the petitioner did not cooperate or provide documents. The inquiry found that work was awarded to a contractor through proper tender process, not the petitioner.
3. The court dismissed the petitions, saying the complaints were an attempt to avoid disciplinary action for irregularities. It imposed a fine on the petitioner for filing frivolous petitions.
Most important judgement for filing of form GST TRAN-1CA PRADEEP GOYAL
Adfert Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner)
Versus
Union of India & Ors. (Respondents)
CWP No.30949 of 2018(O&M)
Date of Decision:-04.11.2019
Punjab & Haryana High Court decided on two types of cases namely (i) registered persons who did/could not file TRAN-1 by 27.12.2017 and have no evidence of attempt to load TRAN-1 (ii) registered persons loaded TRAN-1 by 27.12.2017 but there is mistake and they want to revise already loaded TRAN-1.
This document is a memorandum filed with the High Court of Madras regarding criminal cases and petitions. It summarizes several criminal cases and complaints filed by the petitioner against various government officials and departments. It requests the court to direct the respondents to submit reports and records regarding the cases, and to take necessary action against the accused officials to recover losses and prevent them from escaping punishment. It provides details of several FIRs filed, departmental investigations conducted, and complaints submitted by the petitioner to various authorities over allegations of corruption and misconduct.
This document is a letter from Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), a Government of India enterprise, to heads of various BSNL administrative units. It forwards instructions from the Department of Personnel and Training regarding compliance with the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013. As per the Act, all public servants under BSNL must submit declarations of their assets and liabilities as of March 31st each year to competent authorities by July 31st. The letter instructs BSNL unit heads to ensure these declarations are uploaded to the company website by the deadline of September 15th.
The Supreme Court of Pakistan heard a petition regarding the promotion of civil servants from grade 20 to 21. The petitioner argued that promotions were not being given based on transparent, objective criteria, and instead were subject to political pressures. The court summarized that while several officers met qualifications for promotion, their cases were deferred without clear reasons. The court questioned whether deferrals were meant to favor other candidates rather than reward honest work. It ordered promotions be based solely on merit as outlined in previous court judgments.
The document outlines an agenda for a meeting that includes:
1) Introducing who the company is and who they are trying to help with their product
2) Demonstrating their product
3) Having a question and answer session
The document provides information about starting a business in Truckee, California, including the permit process, fees, and requirements for use permits and minor use permits, as well as an application for a temporary sign permit.
- The document is the annual report of Regent Enterprises Limited for the financial year 2014-15.
- It provides details of the board of directors, auditors, registrar and transfer agents, contents of the annual report including notice of the annual general meeting.
- The notice of annual general meeting provides details of the date, time and venue of the meeting and lists the ordinary and special businesses to be transacted, including adoption of financial statements, appointment of directors and auditors.
The court heard from various parties regarding issues related to the appointment and functioning of Foreigners Tribunals in Assam. It was reported that salaries would be released for newly appointed tribunal members within two weeks. Appointments and staffing of new tribunals would also be completed within two weeks. A two day orientation for newly recruited Assistant Government Pleaders was agreed upon. Consideration of an application for compassionate appointment was allowed to proceed. Further time was given to consider proposed amendments to tribunal rules and finalize complaint monitoring mechanisms. Developing procedures for tribunal member issues and reporting on functioning was also discussed. The case was adjourned for further hearing in three weeks.
1. The document introduces a new Declaration Form (New Form No. 11) to replace the existing Form No. 11 for members of the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation who have a Universal Account Number and completed KYC verification.
2. The new form will also replace Form 13 for fund transfer requests where the member has a UAN.
3. Members with a UAN can now submit claims directly to EPFO without involving their employer by using the new online claim portal.
The document discusses exploded drawings and their advantages. It explains that an exploded drawing lays out the pieces of an object separated from each other to show how they fit together. This allows the viewer to understand how the object assembles and can help buyers and mechanics work with the object. The lesson aims to teach students how to set up an exploded drawing and identify three key advantages: showing how an object assembles, aiding the understanding of buyers and mechanics, and illustrating the assembly of complex objects.
An exploded view drawing shows how objects are assembled by depicting the individual parts as if they have been separated but in their correct positions relative to one another. The document provides examples of exploded view drawings of a desk and trinket box that make clear the assembly process by illustrating each component and where it fits in relation to the others. Creating an exploded view involves redrawing the components of an object as if they have been blown apart while maintaining the accurate alignment of each part.
1. The document discusses exploded views and surface developments which are important for planning the construction of objects.
2. An exploded view is a drawing that shows all the individual pieces of an object. It includes the measurements of each piece to allow recreating the object with real materials.
3. A surface development shows an object fully unfolded with fold lines indicated. This is useful for objects made of materials that need to be folded, like cardboard.
The document discusses exploded drawings and their advantages. It explains that an exploded drawing lays out the pieces of an object separated from each other to show how they fit together. This allows the viewer to understand how the object assembles and can help buyers and mechanics work with the object. The lesson aims to teach students how to set up an exploded drawing and identify three key advantages: showing how an object assembles, aiding the understanding of buyers and mechanics, and illustrating the assembly of complex objects.
The document discusses assembly drawings and isometric views. It explains that assembly drawings show how parts of a product fit together, and can be drawn as fitted assemblies or exploded views. Exploded views separate the parts to show the correct assembly order. The document then provides rules for drawing isometric projections, including that vertical lines stay vertical and horizontal lines incline 30 degrees, all lines are foreshortened, non-isometric lines are drawn using two connecting isometric lines, and hidden edges are typically omitted.
projection of Sectional view-engineering drawing b.techMohd Mujahid Nasir
The document discusses sectional views, which show internal details of objects by cutting away portions. There are three main types of sectional views: full sectional views, which cut the object completely; half sectional views, which cut away half the object; and offset sectional views, which cut on an angle. Hatched lines are used to indicate cut-away areas. Dimension lines are not placed in hatched regions.
The document discusses exploded views and their use in understanding how objects are constructed from individual pieces. An exploded view drawings each piece of an object separately in its relative position, allowing one to see how the pieces fit together. The document provides examples of exploded views and instructions on drawing the views from component diagrams and vice versa. It also discusses constituent part diagrams, which similarly identify individual pieces but sketches them in 2D rather than separating them as in an exploded view.
This document is an affidavit filed in support of a writ petition before the Honorable High Court of Judicature at Chennai. It summarizes the career history and promotions of the 2nd petitioner from 1983 to 2013 within Neyveli Lignite Corporation. It details legal proceedings between the petitioners and NLC regarding the 2nd petitioner's transfer and non-promotion. The petitioners claim the actions of NLC were malicious and caused harassment. The petitioners seek orders directing NLC to submit reports, calling for relevant records, and regularizing the petitioners' periods of service with compensation.
Mamma Affidavit to correct rating and regularisation of periodchandira thangavel
This document is an affidavit filed in the Honorable High Court of Judicature at Chennai by P. Chandira (1st petitioner) on behalf of herself and her husband R. Thangavel (2nd petitioner). It summarizes the career history of the 2nd petitioner in Neyveli Lignite Corporation spanning over 30 years, details allegations of harassment and victimization faced by the petitioners, and lists 12 orders passed in previous legal proceedings that the petitioners are seeking relief from through this writ petition. The petitioners have prayed for the respondents to submit reports in the case and for records pertaining to the previous legal proceedings to be called for, in order to regularize the service period of the petitioners
1. The petitioner filed two criminal petitions seeking transfer of investigation into her complaints to other agencies like the Vigilance department or CBI, alleging a perfunctory investigation by the police.
2. The police counter stated that they summoned the petitioner and others for inquiry but the petitioner did not cooperate or provide documents. The inquiry found that work was awarded to a contractor through proper tender process, not the petitioner.
3. The court dismissed the petitions, saying the complaints were an attempt to avoid disciplinary action for irregularities. It imposed a fine on the petitioner for filing frivolous petitions.
Most important judgement for filing of form GST TRAN-1CA PRADEEP GOYAL
Adfert Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner)
Versus
Union of India & Ors. (Respondents)
CWP No.30949 of 2018(O&M)
Date of Decision:-04.11.2019
Punjab & Haryana High Court decided on two types of cases namely (i) registered persons who did/could not file TRAN-1 by 27.12.2017 and have no evidence of attempt to load TRAN-1 (ii) registered persons loaded TRAN-1 by 27.12.2017 but there is mistake and they want to revise already loaded TRAN-1.
This document is a memorandum filed with the High Court of Madras regarding criminal cases and petitions. It summarizes several criminal cases and complaints filed by the petitioner against various government officials and departments. It requests the court to direct the respondents to submit reports and records regarding the cases, and to take necessary action against the accused officials to recover losses and prevent them from escaping punishment. It provides details of several FIRs filed, departmental investigations conducted, and complaints submitted by the petitioner to various authorities over allegations of corruption and misconduct.
This document is a service tax registration certificate issued to Shiv Human Resource Services located in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. It provides details of the company such as name, address, PAN number, nature of registration, service tax code, taxable services provided which is manpower recruitment/supply agency service, and address of the business premises. It also lists the accounting codes for the registered service and notes important information regarding the registration and requirements.
This document discusses various legal cases and complaints filed by the author regarding corruption in awarding government contracts and honors. It mentions the author's applications for the Kalpana Chawla Award in 2007, 2012, and 2014, and alleges corruption in the selection process. It also describes complaints filed with police and vigilance departments against contractors and officials in various districts regarding corruption and harassment, but claims no action has been taken. The author requests sanctions for prosecution and investigations into the alleged corruption.
1. The applicant/accused Sanjiv Rajendra Bhatt filed applications under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking production of certain documents for his defense that were not part of the chargesheet.
2. The trial court rejected the applications, observing that the documents were not necessary and desirable for a just decision and the applications were aimed at delaying the trial.
3. In this revision application, Bhatt has challenged the rejection of his Section 91 applications, arguing that he is entitled to all documents not relied on by the prosecution as part of a fair trial. The state opposes, arguing the documents are not relevant and the applications are an abuse of process aimed at delaying trial.
This document provides details about the registered firm M/s. J SINGH & ASSOCIATES, including its registration number, address, partners, paid assistants, and details of past firm mergers. The firm has been registered since 1978 and is located in Mumbai, with multiple branch offices. It currently has 20 partners and 15 paid assistants listed. The document also lists 10 previous firm mergers, including details of the merged firms and partners.
The document is an offer letter from M/S Power Mech Projects Ltd to Mr. Veerendra Sahu for the position of Engineer (O&M). The letter offers a gross salary of Rs. 17,000 per month including family accommodation and company benefits. Mr. Sahu is requested to join by March 10, 2014 and submit documents like education certificates, PAN card, salary slip, and relieving letter at joining. He must sign and return a duplicate copy of the letter to accept the offer.
Final status of PMOPG/E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018Om Prakash Poddar
The complainant filed a criminal miscellaneous petition with the Supreme Court of India which raised three defects by the registry. The complainant cured all three defects but the file has now gone missing from the registry. The complainant is seeking a urgent reply from the registry on whether the criminal appeal will be registered and what action has been taken against the appeal. The grievance is currently under process by the Joint Secretary Shri S.C. Barmma at the Prime Minister's Office in New Delhi.
promotion judgemnet of Revenue department staff_welfare_vs_the_state_of_keralashanavas chithara
The document is a high court judgment pertaining to several writ petitions challenging government orders related to seniority lists of employees in the Revenue Department of Kerala. The key details are:
1) WP(C) No. 1364/2011 challenges an order withdrawing a previous government order dated 20.10.2009 regarding seniority lists.
2) Several other writ petitions challenge the same government order dated 20.10.2009 regarding seniority lists.
3) The court deals with the contentions in WP(C) No. 1364/2011 first as it relates to withdrawing the order challenged in the other cases.
4) The petitioners argue that certain clarifications and orders regarding transfer of
The document appears to be a memorandum submitted to the High Court of Judicature at Madras regarding a criminal original petition. It summarizes objections to a counter filed by the 8th respondent (Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Department, Cuddalore). It denies statements made in the counter and argues the case involves corruption and loss of government funds that were not properly recovered or investigated against multiple officials and contractors across three districts. It requests the court to direct a full investigation and recovery of lost funds. The memorandum is submitted along with additional documents in support of the petitioners arguments against the 8th respondent's counter.
The document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition concerning issues related to the functioning of Foreigners Tribunals in Assam. It directs the Assam government to release salaries of newly appointed Foreigners Tribunal members within 7 days and fees of Assistant Government Pleaders within 2 weeks. It also grants the central government 8 weeks to examine proposed amendments to the Foreigners Tribunal order. The committee proposes guidelines for dealing with complaints against Tribunal members which parties will examine. Outstanding dues of a vehicle vendor supplying Tribunals are also to be verified. The case will be heard again on December 6.
This document is a service tax registration certificate issued to Billa Construction and Trading Company. It provides the company's registration details such as name, address, PAN number, nature of registration as a single premise, service tax code, taxable services of works contract and electricity exchange, and address of the business premises. It also lists the accounting codes for the registered taxable services and notes regarding the registration.
P. Chandira has filed a writ petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Chennai seeking permission to represent her husband R. Thangavel and her father P.P. Pattappan in court cases. Chandira has submitted notarized copies of power of attorney documents from her husband and father authorizing her to represent them in legal matters. She is currently working as an Assistant Engineer but has also pursued various degrees including MBA and law. Chandira requests the court to issue a writ of mandamus or other directions allowing her to represent her husband and father in court.
1) This memorandum outlines a writ petition filed in the Madras High Court regarding a property dispute and allegations of forgery.
2) It details the family history and property ownership of the late Perumal Mudhaliar and his sons, including complaints filed with the police by the petitioners against the respondent P. Kolandavel regarding a disputed will and efforts to seize the family property.
3) The petitioners allege that P. Kolandavel has filed fraudulent court cases and harassed family members in order to grab the property, and that a police investigation is needed to determine if the disputed will is forged. They seek dismissal of the civil case regarding the property.
The document is a letter from P. Chandira requesting permission to conduct a fast before the Chennai High Court. Chandira references 10 previous court orders from the Chennai High Court where he represented himself as aggrieved party. He states he sees the High Court as the "Temple of Justice" and the judges as "Gods". However, he is aggrieved by the orders passed. Specifically, Justice Manikumar did not allow him to argue as a party-in-person in one case. He humbly requests permission to fast either before the High Court or the Governor's office to seek justice.
This memorandum summarizes a writ petition filed before the High Court of Chennai by P. Chandira and R. Thangavel against 9 respondents. The petitioners are seeking a writ of certiorari to regularize periods of absence from work as duty periods and to enforce an apartment agreement. They are also seeking compensation of 7 crores for losses and mental agony suffered due to the acts of the respondents. The petition provides background on each of the petitioners and respondents and the circumstances leading to the filing of the writ petition.
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition with the High Court of Madras seeking to quash police reports and court proceedings related to a forged will case. The petitioner alleges that the police failed to properly investigate the forgery and register cases against the accused. The petition outlines 18 grounds claiming deficiencies in the police investigation and judicial proceedings and requests an order directing further investigation and registering cases against the accused.
1) The petitioner, an Assistant Engineer, filed this writ petition challenging illegal charge memos and proceedings against him.
2) The petitioner had previously filed two writ petitions - one in 2012 challenging charge memos by the third respondent, and another in 2012 seeking national awards.
3) Through this petition, the petitioner seeks to amend prayers and add respondents to his previous petitions. He asks the court to award him several state and national prestigious awards for 2007, 2012-2013, 2014-2015, and to quash respondent's opposing proceedings and resolutions.
1) The petitioner, an Assistant Engineer, filed writ petitions in 2012 and 2015 seeking various state and national awards for 2007, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015, including the Kalpana Chawla Award and Padma/Asoka Chakra Awards.
2) The petitions challenged the selection processes and awarding of the honors to other individuals. Notices were issued to government respondents but no replies were submitted.
3) The petitioner provided documentation of the selection processes for the Kalpana Chawla Awards to argue that he was the most deserving applicant. He asked the court to transfer those awards to him and provide the others he sought.
The petitioners, Chandira and Thangavel, filed this writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash proceedings related to their purchase of apartments in Pondicherry and Chennai. They allege undue harassment and mental agony by the respondents regarding the apartment deals from 2008 onward. They seek compensation of 7 crores and permission to jointly file this single writ petition as their grievances are common regarding the jointly purchased properties.
The petitioner filed a petition in the High Court of Madras seeking an order directing police to investigate the forgery of her grandfather's signature on a 1999 partition deed. The court notes that the police had already investigated and filed a report in 1999. The court ruled that a direction for new investigation in 2015 cannot be given for an incident from 1999, but that the petitioner can challenge the deed in a civil court. The petition was therefore closed and the registry's objection upheld.
Mrs. P. Chandira, an assistant engineer at the National Highways in Nagercoil, wrote to the Chief Vigilance Officer regarding Thiru. Natarajan cheating her without purchasing an apartment in Valasaravakkam, Chennai. Though Natarajan received money for the apartment, he did not register the property and made excuses when asked about it. Chandira requested the officer to take immediate steps in the matter.
1) The document details an agreement between two parties to construct a multi-story apartment building. The first party had originally been tasked with construction but could not, so they brought in the second party.
2) The first party had already spent Rs. 6,50,000 for approvals and work. This amount was received from the second party.
3) The agreement specifies that the first party will provide 14 apartments to the second party before any other units are sold.
This document is an affidavit filed in support of a writ petition being filed in the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Chennai by P. Chandira and R. Thangavel against 9 respondents from NLC, Neyveli. The petitioners are seeking a writ of certiorari to promote R. Thangavel to Deputy General Manager, regularize his transfer period as duty, quash disciplinary proceedings against him, correct his performance rating, and provide compensation for losses suffered due to harassment. The petitioners state they have common grievances and are seeking permission to jointly file a single writ petition.
1. The document is a response from the Central Public Information Officer of Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited to an application under the Right to Information Act regarding employees posted to the Barshingsar Project.
2. It provides the names and details of employees posted to the Barshingsar Project in an annexure.
3. It also explains that as per terms of appointment and promotion orders, employees of the corporation are liable to be transferred to any branch, department, or subsidiary of the corporation anywhere in India, and experienced executives have been transferred to the Barshingsar Project for its successful implementation.
1. Shri. R. Thangavel has been posted as Deputy Superintendent/Mechanical in the scale of pay of Rs. 4600-150-5350-160-6470 at the Barshingsar Mining and Power Projects in Rajasthan.
2. He will be eligible for promotion to the next higher grade as per the time bound promotion policy and fixation of pay as per rules.
3. He will receive allowances such as Dearness Allowance, House Rent Allowance, and City Compensatory Allowance as per rules and Project Allowance of 250 of basic pay subject to a maximum of Rs. 500 per month.
This document is a Supreme Court of India judgment regarding whether all entries in an employee's annual confidential report (ACR), or only adverse entries, must be communicated to the employee. The Court held that all entries, not just adverse entries, must be communicated so that the employee has an opportunity to make representations and request upgrades if they feel an entry is unjustified. Not communicating an entry was found to violate principles of natural justice and be arbitrary under Article 14 of the Constitution. Therefore, rules or policies stating only adverse entries need be communicated were found to be illegal.
Mrs. Pattappan Chandra Thangavel is a 47-year-old female Indian citizen from Tamil Nadu who is being recommended for the Padma Award. She currently lives in Neyveli-3, Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu with her husband and works as an Assistant Engineer (H) for Nabard & Rural Roads in Panruti. She has previously received the Kalpana Award in 2007, 2012 and 2014 and a Central Award in 2012 for her work in public interest affairs.
1. From
R.Thangavel,M.E.,
Represented by his wife and Power of Attorney,
The Chief Manager, TPS-I, CPFNo:27329,
NLC,Neyveli- 3,
Cuddalore District.
To
The Director (HR),
Neyveli Lignite Corporation,
Neyveli.
Respected Sir,
Sub: Monetary benefits of Deputy General Manager from 19.08.09, the Date of
Joining at Rajasthan Barshingsar Project-Regularisation of period as duty
As the charge memo 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08
issued is illegal and inordinate delay as per central vigilance commission
manual -ACR Rating as “Out standing” as per Apex Court Judgement in
Civil Appeal 7631/02 and consequential benefits-to Promote as Deputy
General Manager or General Manager-Reg.
Ref: 1) Lr.No:5617/P&A II-4/91-22 by DGM (P&A), NLC. Dated:22.08.91.
2) Corp/P&A/502/355/08-28 DGM (P&A), NLC, Neyveli Dt:02.04.08
3) NLC CPIO Lr.No:PRD/CPIO/0062/2008-6 Dt: 08.07.08
4) W.P.No:17124/08. Dated:01.09.08
5) Lr.No: CORP/CGM/P&A/EE/0502/2008 Dated: 15.09.08
6) Review No: 103/08 without any order in M.P.No:1/08.Dt:24.09.08
7) Representation to CMD on 24.12.08
8) 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08
2. 9) WASRNo: 15515/09 Dated: 04.03.09
10) PostalDepartment communication Dated: 12.03.09
11) 2b Petition dated: 27.05.09
12) WPNo: 11001/09 Dated: 24.06.09
13) Substituted order in W.P.No:17124/08 Dated:02.07.09
14) 2nd Substituted order in W.P.No:17124/08 Dated: 07.08.09
15) Disciplinary enquiry Dated: 10.09.09
16) Enquiry officer ReportDated: 16.09.09
17) Denied Reportby me Dated: 22.10.09.
18) Show cause notice Dated: 06.01.11 by G.M, Disciplinary
Authority,Barsginsar in O.ONo:5801/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2011 on 10.01.11
19) Denied Reportby me Dated: 18.01.11.
20)Order Dated: 02.02.11 by G.M,Disciplinary Authority, Barsginsar
in O.ONo:6071/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2011.
21) Appeal to Project head, the Appellate Authority on 07.02.11
22) Order Dated: 22.02.11 by the Project head, the Appelate Authority,
Barsginsar in O.ONo:6354/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2011 on 25.02.11.
23) Joined duty back to Neyveli on 23.09.11.
24)Appeal in Rating to Unit Head,Neyveli on 18.10.14 &19.03.15
25) Supreme Court Judgement Civil Appeal 7631/02.
26)Lr submitted to CMD,NLC &CVO,NLC to fix the seniority on 11.02.15.
27) Vigilance Department &CMD,NLC forwaded Director (HR)for necessary
action on 03.03.15.
28) DGM(P&A)Lr.No:CORP/HR/EB(Exec)/517/CM/2014-1 Dt:12.04.15
29) The CVO,NLC,Neyveli Cir.No.CORP/HR/DA/1643/2015 Dt:15.04.15
3. 1. I, P. Chandira, wife of R. Thangavel,CPFNo:27329, who is working as
Chief Manager in Neyveli Lignite Corporation sincerely submits this letter
before the esteemed Neyveli Lignite Corporation on behalf of my husband as
Notary attested power of Attorney.
2. My husband Shri.R.Thangavel’s CPF No is 27329 and he joined in
Neyveli Lignite Corporation on 15.11.83. The board of directors conducted an
interview for selecting the candidate on their outstanding ability for Rajasthan
Barshingsar Project in the year of 1991. My husband Shri.R.Thangavel was
selected and the management has passed an order in Lr.No:5617/P&A II-4/91-
22 by DGM (P&A), NLC. Dated: 22.08.91 with monetary benefits of Next
higher grade. I herewith submit the copy of the letter as first document in the
attachment. As my husband asked job for me in the year 1991,the management
not instructed my husband to join at Rajasthan Project.
3. I am working as an Assistant Engineer in Tamilnadu Highways
Department from 25.01.98. When I was working as an Assistant Engineer in
Highways Department I was forced to do illegal activities punishable under
Indian Penal Codes. Hence I proceeded legally in O.A.No:2113/01 and
subsequently faced W.P.No:26463/01 and got orders in W.P.No:26463/01
Dated: 04.03.02, 14.03.02, 23.04.03 and 24.06.03. I am witness to Tamilnadu
State Vigilance in FIRNo:10/03 filed by the Inspector of
Police,V&AC,Cuddalore on 10.11.03. The inordinate delay in finalising the
case and to permit the accused to escape from clutches of law. Due to the
inordinate delay myself and my husband was harassed in many ways and still
the loss to the Government money has not recovered.
4. When we have planned to purchase an apartment in Pondicherry
through Thiru.Natarajan and Thiru.Ananthakrishnan in Pondicherry on
13.03.08.The General Manager,TPS-I counselled Thiru.Rao and
Thiru.Ananthakrishnan for Rajasthan Transfer in the year of 2008 which was
4. clearly explained in WANo:282/09 before Chennai High Court. Thiru.Natarajan
and Thiru.Ananthakrishnan planned to construct Pondicherry building in
violation of PPA Rules and Regulations. Thiru.Rao joined duty and
Thiru.Ananthakrishnan name was replaced with my husband in the year of 2008
in Corp/P&A/502/355/08-28 DGM (P&A), NLC, Neyveli Dt: 02.04.08. The
central public information officer in his letter dated:08.07.08 stated that my
husband is outstanding, talented and well experienced candidate need for
Project Site. I herewith submit the copy of the letter as second document in the
attachment.When there are 416 outstanding candidate was available in
Mechanical Discipline, the management transferred my husband. Hence it is
necessary to fix the seniority before 416 Engineers. Subsequently we have
planned to purchase an apartment in Valasaravakkam,Chennai through
Thiru.Natarajan on 14.05.08. The management has passed an extension on
22.05.08 up to 14.07.08. I herewith submit the copy of the seniority list
received through Right to Information Act as third document in the attachment.
As I am witness to Tamilnadu Vigilance Department I faced life threatening
hence myself and husband submitted a letter to the management to main the
“status quo”of the order until FIRNo:10/03 is pending on 11.07.08.The copy of
the letters are submitted as fourth and fifth document in Attachment.
5. CGM(P&A) passed a proceeding No: CORP/ P&A/EE/0502/2008
Dated: 15.09.08 based upon the order of W.P.No:17124/08 Dated: 01.09.08,
when the Miscellaneous Petition in Review No: 103/08 in W.P.No:17124/08
was pending. The management has not considered the same. The Hon’ble High
Court substituted the Order in W.P.No:17124/08 on 02.07.09 and subsequently
substituted on 07.08.09. When the Hon’ble High Court substituted the order
dated: 01.09.08 on 02.07.09 &07.08.09 the any proceedings initiated by the
management based upon the order of W.P.No:17124/08 is impugned proceeding
No: Lr.No: CORP/ P&A/EE/0502/2008 Dated: 15.09.08 and Memo No:
7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 is illegal and null and void.
5. Even though illegal charge memo created against the 2nd petitioner, he denied
the charges and attended enquiries, the departmental enquiry officer and
presenting officer closed the enquiry on 10.09.09 and the management ready to
provide the post of Deputy General Manager post and to regularise the period as
duty.The order in W.P.No:17124/08 as submitted as sixth document,
CGM(P&A)Lr.No:CORP/P&A/EE/0502/2008 Dated:15.09.08 as seventh
document, Memo No: 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 as eight
document in the attachment.
6. Even though my husband received order in WPSRNo: 15155/09 on
04.03.09 before the Division bench and directed the CMD to consider my
husband’s representation dated: 24.12.08. As per the representation submitted to
the CMD, my husband is eligible get monetary benefits of Deputy General
Manager with effect from 19.08.09. The Hon’ble High Court passed an order on
18.03.09 to join duty and submit his grievance to the management. The
management has followed a procedure by conducting interview for the selection
of outstanding candidates for Rajasthan Barshingsar Project in the year of 1991
with next higher grade benefit in DGM(P&A) Lr.No:5617/P&A II-4/91-22
Dated:22.08.91.My husband was transferred from ACM and hence he is eligible
to get monetary benefits of DGM the next higher grade as the Chief Manager
and ACM scale of pay is the same. Hence my husband is eligible for monetary
benefits for Deputy General Manager grade from 19.08.09. Even though the
charges issued are illegal to my husband he attended the departmental enquiry
and the enquiry officer and the presenting officer closed the enquiry
proceedings on 10.09.09 with the acceptance to grant Deputy General Manager
Promotion with effect from 19.08.09 and regularisation of Period as duty. If
they have not accepted to grant DGM Promotion and regularisation of period
they must have given “reasonable opportunity in accordance with Principles of
Natural Justice” provided the requested documents on 06.06.09 and 08.06.09 at
Rajasthan Barshingsar Project. The copy of the order WASRNo: 15515/09 as
6. ninth document,the Postal department communication on 12.03.09 as tenth
document,W.P.No:11001/09 as eleventh document,the departmental enquiry
proceeding on 10.09.09 as twelfth document,the copy of the notary attested
power of Attorney document as thirteenth document,the copy of the Chief
Vigilance officer letter No:179/CVO/NLC/2014 Dated:04.02.14 as fourteenth
document submitted in the attachment.
7. My husband obeyed the order of this Hon’ble Court and joined duty at
Rajasthan Barshingsar Project and submitted representation to consider for
Promotion, regularisation of Period through Proper Channel on 10.09.09
through the departmental enquiry officer against the illegal charge memo
No:7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated:11.11.2008 for not joining duty at
Rajasthan
8. The enquiry officer submitted report on 16.09.09 and my husband
submitted denied report on 22.10.09 to the enquiry officer. I am the witness to
my husband Disciplinary case on my husband side. As I got chest pain as the
my husband joined his duty at Rajasthan and admitted in the Neyveli Lignite
Corporation Hospital ,I was not able to attend enquiry at Rajasthan Barshingsar
Project for the 2nd time. I attended enquiry on 6th and 8th at Barshingsar Project
along with my husband. As the management has not provided the documents on
that day the enquiry was adjourned. In the mean time the state Vigilance
Department has closed the FIRNo: 10/03 by passing G.O.No:203 Dated:
03.11.09 subsequent Govt Lr.No:13.10.08 and action dropped 01.12.10.
9. The management has inordinately delayed to pass an order and
issued show cause notice in Lr.No:5801/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2010 Dated:
06.01.11 by the General Manager, the Disciplinary Authority received by my
husband on 10.01.11. The General Manager is inordinately delayed the case
22.10.09 and caused the possibility of getting promotion in two DPC. My
7. husband submitted denied statement on 18.01.11 to the General Manager, the
Disciplinary Authority. The General Manager, the Disciplinary Authority
passed an order in O.O.No:6071/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2011 Dated: 02.02.11.My
husband denied the statement and appeal submitted to the Project head, the
Appellate Authority on 07.02.2011.The Appellate authority, the Project head
passed an order in Lr.No:6354/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2011 received on
25.02.11.My husband rejoined his duty at Neyveli on 23.09.11on his
completion of service at Rajasthan Barshingsar Project. The case filed before
the Hon’ble High Court to quash the impugned proceeding No: Lr.No: CORP/
P&A/EE/0502/2008 Dated: 15.09.08 and subsequent Memo No:
7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 is posted before the Hon’ble
High Court for admission on 10.02.12 and the NLC advocates received the
notice and subsequently dismissed as infrutous on 13.02.12. Subsequently the
case is filed by me on 07.10.2012 is posted for admission for maintainability on
30.03.15 in WPSRNo:117221 and 117222 under Prerogative Writ. I submitted
miscellaneous petition to amend the prayer on 30.03.15 and listed on 29.04.15
to recover the loss to the Government money. The Hon’ble Justice advised to
separate petition for my husband. Hence Writ Appeal is filed in
W.P.No:11001/09 and the Writ petition is filed to quash the subsequent Memo
No: 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 and rating awarded to my
husband as “good “instead of “outstanding”. As per Supreme Court five bench
Judgement any entry except “outstanding” rating has to be communicated to the
employee to improve his performance. No communication has received by my
husband . I submitted fifteen pages of 1st typed set and the additional typed set
of one hundred and three pages submitted before this Hon’ble High Court and
the Hon’ble Apex Court Judgement of Civil Appeal No: 7631/2002. The
employees ACR are graded as 1) Out standing 2) Very good 3) Good 4) Fair
&5) Satisfactory. Except “out standing” entry other entries has to be
communicated to the individual to improve their performance.
8. 10. I submitted two compliants on 27.05.12 to the Chief Vigilance officer,
Neyveli Lignite Corporation against Thiru.Ananthakrishnan and
Thiru.Natarajan to get back our property at Pondy and Valasaravakkam. The
Chief Vigilance officer passed final order on 03.03.15. I am very disappointed
about the order passed by the Chief Vigilance officer,Neyveli Lignite
Corporation and we have not yet get back our property. The inordinate delay
from 27.05.12 to 03.03.15 in finalising the cases causes undue harassment to me
and also to my husband in many ways. As per the Central Vigilance
Commission Manual any disciplinary proceedings has to be completed within
six months period of time.
11. In order to attend enquiry and to submit documents against
Thiru.Ananthakrishnan and Thiru.Natarajan I faced so many difficulties and
threatening in many ways in the result management has reduced the rating of
my husband as “Good”.I submitted compliants against to get back our
property.My husband sumbmitted an application to correct the rating of my
husband as “Outstanding”.As per Supreme Court Judgement Civil Appeal
7631/2002 the rating except outstanding entry has to be communicated to the
individual to improve their performance.As my husband was not communicated
from the management the ACR entry should be outstanding”.I herewith submit
the representation dated:18.10.2014 and 19.03.15 to the management as
fifteenth and sixteenth document submitted in the attachment. As the
management has transferred my husband to Rajasthan Barshingsar Project as
he is outstanding than 416 available Engineer.Hence the management may
please to fix his seniority before 416 Engineers. Hence I submitted a
representation to the Chief Vigilance officer and Chairman-Cum-Managing
Director of NLC on 11.02.15 which was forwaded to you in
Lr.No:VIG/NLC/CTS/AA/0025/2015 Dated:03.03.15.I herewith submit the
copy of my letter dated:11.02.15 as seventeenth,
Lr.No:VIG/NLC/CTS/AA/0025/2015 dated:03.03.15 as eighteenth,rating
9. display in the internet as nineteenth,Vigilance department letter
GM/VIG/DCE/2015 Dated:03.03.15 as twentieth ,DGM(P&A)Lr.No:CORP/
HR/EB(Exec)/ 517/CM/2014-1 Dt:12.04.15, as twenty first, CVO,NLC,Neyveli
Cir.No.CORP/HR/DA/ 1643/2015 Dt:15.04.15 twenty second document and
Civil Appeal the Supreme Court Judgement 7631/02 as twenty third document
in the attachment. The Chief Vigilance officer Circular clearly states that any
disciplinary proceedings have to be completed within six months.
12. As I am witness to state vigilance and NLC vigilance,my husband
suffered in getting due promotion, loss of pay and rating are affected. Hence, I
submit this representation along with the documents on behalf of my husband to
get Monetary benefits of Deputy General Manager from 19.08.09, the Date of
Joining at Rajasthan Barshingsar Project-Regularisation of period as duty As
the charge memo 7596/NLC/BP/P&A/Displ/2008 Dated: 11.11.08 issued is
illegal and inordinate delay as per central vigilance commission manual -ACR
Rating as “Out standing” as per Apex Court Judgement in Civil Appeal 7631/02
and consequential benefits-to Promote my husband as Deputy General Manager
or General Manager and thereby render justice.
Dated: 11.05.14 P.Chandira wife and Notary Attested Power of Attorney
Place: Panruti For R.Thangavel.
Attachments:
Twenty three documents as mentioned in the subject.
Apex Court Judgement of Civil Appeal 7631/02.
Copy humbly submitted to:
1)CMD,NLC,Neyveli 2)CVO,NLC,Neyveli