9. AMR burden in India
• In 2019 - 297,000 deaths attributable to AMR and 1,042,500 deaths associated
with AMR
• India has the 145th highest age-standardized mortality rate per 100,000
population associated with AMR across 204 countries
https://amrcountryprogress.org/dow
nload/AMR-self-assessment-survey-
responses-2020-2021
10. Placing AMR in context with other causes of
death in 2019, India
https://amrcountryprogress.org/download/AMR-
self-assessment-survey-responses-2020-2021
11. Globally, the Majority of ICU infections Are Due to Gram-
Negative Bacteria
70% of infected patients had positive cultures
63% were gram negative;
Vincent et al. JAMA. 2009;302:2323-9.
Data from the Extended Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC II) Study, a global,
1-day point prevalence study of 13,796 patients from 1,265 ICUs in 75 countries in 2007.
Pseudomonas
spp.
Escherichia
coli
Klebsiella
spp.
Other
Enterobacter
spp.
Acinetobacter
spp.
13. Its real challenge………
Antibiotic resistance is a worldwide phenomenon and a global public
health crisis
The overuse and misuse of antibiotics in the human sector as well as
animal, food, agricultural arenas have contributed it
The challenge is greater in developing countries, where the burden of
infectious diseases is high
ID consultants faced novel peculiar challenges in the treatment of severe
infections especially in critically ill patients, due to MDR-GNB
Prim Care Clin Office Pract 45 (2018) 467–484
BMJ 2012;344:e1567 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1567
Front. Med. 6:74. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00074
14. The intensive care units (ICUs) are often called “the
hubs” of infections
• Extremely vulnerable group
• Reduced/dysregulated immune responses
• Multiple procedures
• Transfer between hospitals, prolonged stay
• Previous antibiotic administration
• Invasive devices
• Endotracheal intubation
• Central venous cannulations
• Mechanical ventilation (MV)
• Urinary catheterizations
Curr Opin Infect Dis 2009;22:364‐9
CID 2011:53 (15 July)
15. Why resistance is concern?
• Resistant organism Leads to
treatment failure
• Increased mortality
• Spread in community
• Increased health care cost
• Threatens return to pre-
antibiotic era
16. Factors affecting AMR
• Drug related factor
• OTC
• Irrational FDC
• Irrational use of Abx
• Patient related factor
• Lack of sanitation
• Self medication
• Poverty
• Misconception
• Following the same prescription
• Environment related factor
• Poor sanitation
• Prescriber related factor
• Treating serology – eg widal test
• Using antibiotics in Viral URTI,
bronchitis
• Improper diagnosis
17. Point to be discussed
• Scale of problem
• Resistance mechanism
• Detection of resistance
• Prevention of resistance
22. Problematic Gram-Negatives and Mechanisms of
Resistance
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
◦ AmpC production, efflux pumps (MexAB-OprM, etc), outer membrane porin changes (i.e., loss of OprD), Metallo-
Beta-Lactamase production (e.g., blaVIM, blaIMP), gyrA/parC mutations, aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AME),
ESBL / KPC production
Acinetobacter species
◦ AmpC, ESBL (TEM-1, SHV-type, CTX-M-type), and serine (blaOXA) and metallo (blaVIM, blaIMP) carbapenemase
production, outer membrane porin changes, AME, gyrA/parC mutations, efflux pumps
Enterobacteriaceae (Klebsiella species, E. coli, Enterobacter species)
◦ ESBL, Klebsiella-producing-carbapenemase (KPC-2, -3, -4, etc.) production, New Delhi Metallo-Beta-Lactamase
(NDM-1, -2), AmpC, outer membrane porin changes, plasmid mediated quinolone resistance gene (qnrA)
Bonomo RA, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:S49-56, Nicasio AM, et al. Pharmacotherapy 2008;28:235-49
23. Mechanisms of Resistance in GNB to -lactams (Penicillin,
cephalosporin, carbapenem, monobactum)
Porin-mediated resistance
• Antibiotic does not reach target
ß-lactamases
• Majority of resistance to ß-lactam antibiotics mediated through ß-lactamases
• Many different types of ß-lactamases with different substrate (antibiotic)
specificities
24. -Lactamases
• Well over 340 different enzymes
• Broad spectrum -lactamases
• Extended spectrum -lactamases (ESBLs)
• AmpC -lactamases
• Chromosomal
• Plasmid-mediated
• Carbapenemases
26. ESBLs and its clinical significance
• ESBLs are plasmid-mediated enzymes capable of hydrolysing and
inactivating all cephalosporins, penicillins, and monobactams
• Derivatives (mutants) of original TEM-1 and SHV-1 -lactamases
• Susceptible in-vitro to clavulanate and cefoxitin
• Despite appearing susceptible to one or more penicillins, cephalosporins,
or aztreonam in vitro, the use of these agents to treat infections due to
ESBL-producers has been associated with poor clinical outcome
• ESBL genes are often carried on plasmids that also encode resistance to
multiple classes of antimicrobials (Aminoglycosides, FQs, TMP/SMX)
• Treatment experience is largely based on classical ESBL producers
(Carbapenems, ß-lactam/inhibitor combinations)
27. AmpC ß-lactamases
• Chromosomally encoded as well as plasmid mediated
• Normally are repressed, so produced at low levels
• Capable of hydrolyzing a number of ß-lactam agents some in basal
AmpC production and others in setting of increased AmpC production
• Increased production occur in presence of specific antibiotic and later
that antibiotics stops working most notably ceftriaxone, cefotaxime,
and ceftazidime
28. ESBLs vs AmpCs
ESBLs AmpCs
Inhibitors (pip/tazo,
amp/sulbactam, amox/clav)
S R
Cefoxitin, cefotetan S R
Ceftazidime, ceftriaxone R R
Cefepime S/R S
29. Mechanisms of Carbapenem Resistance in GNB
• Carbapenemase - hydrolyzing enzymes
• Porin loss “OprD”
• ESBL or AmpC + porin loss (NC-CRE)
30. Carbapenemases
• The most versatile family of -lactamases
• Either chromosomal encoded or plasmid mediated
• Plasmid mediated is associated with other resistant genes (aminoglycosides,
fluoroquinolones)
• Two major groups based on the hydrolytic mechanism at the active site
• Serine at the active site: class A( KPC) and D (OXA)
• Zinc at the active site: class B (MBL- VIM, IMP, NDM)
• All carbapenemases hydrolyze penicillins, extended spectrum cephalosporins, and
carbapenems
32. Emerging carbapenem resistance in Gram-
negatives
• Significantly limits treatment options for life-threatening infections
• Options left with
◦ Polymyxin, Tigecycline/Minocycline, Fosfomycin
◦ Ceftazidime/Avibactum ± Aztreonam
33. Plasmid-mediated resistance to colistin
(Nov. 18th, 2015)
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
2011 2012 2013 2014
Food animal
Retail meat
Inpatient
15-20% in animals (Pigs/Chicken)
5-25% in food animal products
<1% in hospital patients
34. …and other colistin-resistance
mcr-1 resistance gene variants
BB Xavier et al., Eurosurveillance, July
2016
mcr-2 in animals (pigs)
-76% nucleotide identity with
mcr-1
-in Belgian in porcine coli-R E.
coli
-Located on a transferable
plasmid IncX4
-harboured on a mobile
element
Di Pilato et al., Antimicrob
Agents, Chemother, September
2016
mcr-1.2 in humans
-99% nucleotide identity with mcr-1
-KPC-3 producing K. pneumoniae (ST
512) ---Surveillance culture (rectal
swab) in a hospitalized patient
-IncX4 plasmid (very similar to mcr-1)
-found in E. coli and K. pneumoniae in
distant geographic areas
35. • Recently, emerging reports of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance,
mcr genes in E. coli is alarming
• Notably, mcr-1, mcr-2, mcr-3 and mcr-4 genes were first reported in
E. coli
• Plasmid mediated in E coli while chromosomal mediated in Klebsiella
• Colistin resistance in A. baumannii can be due to mutations in lipid A
biosynthesis genes and point mutations in PmrAB two-component
regulatory system (TCS)
Indian J Med Res 149, February 2019, pp 87-96
36. Community-Associated Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase–
Producing Escherichia coli Infection in the United States
• A substantial portion of community-onset, ESBL-producing E. coli infections now
occur among patients without healthcare-associated risk factors in the United
States
• 91.3% of the isolates produced CTX-M–type ESBL
Clinical Infectious Diseases 2013;56(5):641–
37. Point to be discussed
• Scale of problem
• Resistance mechanism
• Detection of resistance
• Prevention of resistance
41. Point to be discussed
• Scale of problem
• Resistance mechanism
• Detection of resistance
• Prevention of resistance
42. Challenges in prevention
• MDR-GNB spread through five steps
• Presence of microbes on patient skin and/or in environment
• Transfer of these organisms to health care workers (HCWs) hands
• Microbe survival on HCWs’ hands
• Incorrect hand cleansing by HCWs
• Cross-transmission to other patients
43. Strategies that work in healthcare system
• Preventing device and procedure related infections, such as from
urinary catheters
• Stopping the spread of resistant germs within and between
healthcare facilities
• Containing emerging threats through early detection and aggressive
response
• Tracking and improving appropriate antibiotic use
• Infection and prevention control
44. Preventive strategies
• Core measures
• Administrative support
• Surveillance
• Hand hygiene
• Contact precautions
• Protocol for lab notification
• Dedicated equipment
• Device use
• Environmental
• Education (Diagnostic stewardship and Antimicrobial stewardship)
• Supplemental measures
• Active surveillance culture
Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(7):504–535. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2008.06.001
45. Strategies to control AMR
• Judicious use of Abx
• Developing new Abx
• Farmers and food industry: Stop using Abx
• Prevent unnecessary use in animals
• No OTC Abx
47. In summary
• AMR is global crisis, India is struggling with Resistant GNBs
• For GNB, multiple mechanisms of resistance to previously useful
antibiotics is becoming the norm
• Beta lactamases production is an important mechanism of resistance
• Need for rapid diagnostics and efficient laboratories to anticipating
diagnosis rapidly
• Relatively few new drugs are being developed
• Containment should be pursued through implementation of adequate
infection prevention procedures and antimicrobial stewardship