SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
Stephanie Herfel
Librarian
Newburgh Campus Library
Be a investigator…
Purpose (What and For Who?)
 Why was the website created?
 .edu and .gov sites are reliable
 .com generally exist to sell you something
 .org sites are okay as long as the purpose is not to
  convince that an opinion is fact
 Who is the intended audience?
 Is there a lot of advertising on the page = Be critical!
Authority (Who?)
   Is the author’s name easy to find?
   Is the author an expert on the topic?
   Is an About Us page included?
   Does the website have a contact page?
   .gov, .edu, or .org site?
ABOUT US
American Cancer Society http://www.cancer.org/
Objectivity (Fact or Opinion?)
 Why was the webpage created?
 Is the information fact or just an opinion?
 Look out for bias
 Bias = an opinion formed without evidence,
  facts, or knowledge.
 List of references?
Currency (When?)
 When was the webpage written?
 When was the page last updated?
 Medical and technology- dates are important
 Literature and history topics- dates are less important
Coverage(How Much?)
 Is there enough information for
  your purpose?
 Is the information provided appropriate for college research?
 Can the same information be found from a more credible source?
(book, encyclopedia, or journal article)
Design (How?)
 How is the information arranged?
 Is it well organized?
 Is the webpage free of
  spelling/grammar errors?
A reliable website has:
 Purpose. If your page was created to educate or help others and…

 Authority. If your page lists the author credentials and its domain is preferred
  (.edu, .gov, .org, or .net) and…

 Objectivity. If your page provides accurate information with limited advertising
  and it is objective in presenting the information, and . . .

 Currency. If your page is current and updated regularly (as stated on the page)
  and the links (if any) are also up-to-date, and . . .

 Coverage. If your page has enough information to suit your purpose, and …

 Design If the information is well organized and free of errors then . . .

        IT HAS CREDIBILITY = A RELIABLE SOURCE OF INFORMATION!
Work Cited
Kapoun, Jim. "Teaching undergrads Web evaluation: A
      guide for library instruction." C&RL News
     (July/August 1998): 522-523.

More Related Content

What's hot

Evaluating sources for credibility
Evaluating sources for credibilityEvaluating sources for credibility
Evaluating sources for credibilityEdwardsLibrary
 
Evaluating Internet Sources
Evaluating Internet SourcesEvaluating Internet Sources
Evaluating Internet SourcesEmma Sherriff
 
Evaluating Web Sources For Research
Evaluating Web Sources For ResearchEvaluating Web Sources For Research
Evaluating Web Sources For Researchmahrya
 
The Craap Test for evaluating resources
The Craap Test for evaluating resourcesThe Craap Test for evaluating resources
The Craap Test for evaluating resourcesCapULibrary
 
What the C.R.A.P.?
What the C.R.A.P.?What the C.R.A.P.?
What the C.R.A.P.?ramona2020
 
Evaluating Your Sources
Evaluating Your SourcesEvaluating Your Sources
Evaluating Your Sourceshisled
 
Website Evaluation Lesson
Website Evaluation Lesson Website Evaluation Lesson
Website Evaluation Lesson J V
 
Is my source credible?
Is my source credible?Is my source credible?
Is my source credible?jamebuck
 
Source Credibility
Source CredibilitySource Credibility
Source CredibilitySam Georgi
 
Finding and Evaluating Sources
Finding and Evaluating SourcesFinding and Evaluating Sources
Finding and Evaluating Sourcesanngeht
 
Credible sources of information
Credible sources of informationCredible sources of information
Credible sources of informationRuqaya Anani
 
Reliable resources powerpoint
Reliable resources powerpointReliable resources powerpoint
Reliable resources powerpointbrittanyhavers
 
Lesson 4: Evaluating Sources
Lesson 4: Evaluating SourcesLesson 4: Evaluating Sources
Lesson 4: Evaluating SourcesLeslie Lewis
 
Evaluation of Internet Information
Evaluation of Internet Information Evaluation of Internet Information
Evaluation of Internet Information Ahmed-Refat Refat
 
Internet Evaluation
Internet EvaluationInternet Evaluation
Internet EvaluationLisa Hartman
 
Choosing Credible Sources of Information
Choosing Credible Sources of InformationChoosing Credible Sources of Information
Choosing Credible Sources of InformationTricia Mayer
 

What's hot (20)

Evaluating sources for credibility
Evaluating sources for credibilityEvaluating sources for credibility
Evaluating sources for credibility
 
Evaluating Internet Sources
Evaluating Internet SourcesEvaluating Internet Sources
Evaluating Internet Sources
 
Evaluating Web Sources For Research
Evaluating Web Sources For ResearchEvaluating Web Sources For Research
Evaluating Web Sources For Research
 
The Craap Test for evaluating resources
The Craap Test for evaluating resourcesThe Craap Test for evaluating resources
The Craap Test for evaluating resources
 
What the C.R.A.P.?
What the C.R.A.P.?What the C.R.A.P.?
What the C.R.A.P.?
 
Web criteria
Web criteriaWeb criteria
Web criteria
 
Evaluating Your Sources
Evaluating Your SourcesEvaluating Your Sources
Evaluating Your Sources
 
Website Evaluation Lesson
Website Evaluation Lesson Website Evaluation Lesson
Website Evaluation Lesson
 
Is my source credible?
Is my source credible?Is my source credible?
Is my source credible?
 
Source Credibility
Source CredibilitySource Credibility
Source Credibility
 
Finding and Evaluating Sources
Finding and Evaluating SourcesFinding and Evaluating Sources
Finding and Evaluating Sources
 
Educación Lúdica
Educación Lúdica Educación Lúdica
Educación Lúdica
 
Credible sources of information
Credible sources of informationCredible sources of information
Credible sources of information
 
Reliable resources powerpoint
Reliable resources powerpointReliable resources powerpoint
Reliable resources powerpoint
 
Lesson 4: Evaluating Sources
Lesson 4: Evaluating SourcesLesson 4: Evaluating Sources
Lesson 4: Evaluating Sources
 
Fact checktest
Fact checktestFact checktest
Fact checktest
 
Evaluation of Internet Information
Evaluation of Internet Information Evaluation of Internet Information
Evaluation of Internet Information
 
Evaluating Sources
Evaluating SourcesEvaluating Sources
Evaluating Sources
 
Internet Evaluation
Internet EvaluationInternet Evaluation
Internet Evaluation
 
Choosing Credible Sources of Information
Choosing Credible Sources of InformationChoosing Credible Sources of Information
Choosing Credible Sources of Information
 

Viewers also liked

Apa citation2014
Apa citation2014Apa citation2014
Apa citation2014sherfel
 
Primary and Secondary Sources in Science Research
Primary and Secondary Sources in Science ResearchPrimary and Secondary Sources in Science Research
Primary and Secondary Sources in Science Researchsherfel
 
Apa citation
Apa citationApa citation
Apa citationsherfel
 
Primary secf2016
Primary secf2016Primary secf2016
Primary secf2016sherfel
 
A and pii embedded
A and pii embeddedA and pii embedded
A and pii embeddedsherfel
 

Viewers also liked (6)

Apa citation2014
Apa citation2014Apa citation2014
Apa citation2014
 
Primary and Secondary Sources in Science Research
Primary and Secondary Sources in Science ResearchPrimary and Secondary Sources in Science Research
Primary and Secondary Sources in Science Research
 
Choosing primary sources
Choosing primary sourcesChoosing primary sources
Choosing primary sources
 
Apa citation
Apa citationApa citation
Apa citation
 
Primary secf2016
Primary secf2016Primary secf2016
Primary secf2016
 
A and pii embedded
A and pii embeddedA and pii embedded
A and pii embedded
 

Similar to Presentation has Typo2

CRAP Test for website credibility
CRAP Test for website credibilityCRAP Test for website credibility
CRAP Test for website credibilityvirginiawooten
 
Website Evaluation
Website EvaluationWebsite Evaluation
Website Evaluationknightama
 
Research Presentation
Research PresentationResearch Presentation
Research Presentationguest3d082a
 
Assessing websites
Assessing websitesAssessing websites
Assessing websitesIngelesa
 
Evaluating sites for leap
Evaluating sites for leapEvaluating sites for leap
Evaluating sites for leapTori Jensen
 
375643 634074779366488750
375643 634074779366488750375643 634074779366488750
375643 634074779366488750selinabernard91
 
W13 libr250 evaluating and citing websites1
W13 libr250 evaluating and citing websites1W13 libr250 evaluating and citing websites1
W13 libr250 evaluating and citing websites1lterrones
 
Carol jones evaluating web sites
Carol jones evaluating web sitesCarol jones evaluating web sites
Carol jones evaluating web sitesTricia Slechta
 
Carol jones evaluating web sites
Carol jones evaluating web sitesCarol jones evaluating web sites
Carol jones evaluating web sitesTricia Slechta
 
Brody task7-power point
Brody task7-power pointBrody task7-power point
Brody task7-power pointdelaneybrody
 
Brody task7-power point
Brody task7-power pointBrody task7-power point
Brody task7-power pointdelaneybrody
 
Brody task7-power point
Brody task7-power pointBrody task7-power point
Brody task7-power pointdelaneybrody
 
Brody task7-power point
Brody task7-power pointBrody task7-power point
Brody task7-power pointdelaneybrody
 
Criteria
CriteriaCriteria
Criteriaannulp
 
Evaluating Websites
Evaluating WebsitesEvaluating Websites
Evaluating WebsitesLisa Barnett
 
Information Evaluation
Information EvaluationInformation Evaluation
Information EvaluationNicoleBranch
 

Similar to Presentation has Typo2 (20)

CRAP Test for website credibility
CRAP Test for website credibilityCRAP Test for website credibility
CRAP Test for website credibility
 
Evaluation Of A Site
Evaluation Of A SiteEvaluation Of A Site
Evaluation Of A Site
 
Website Evaluation
Website EvaluationWebsite Evaluation
Website Evaluation
 
Evaluation Websites
Evaluation WebsitesEvaluation Websites
Evaluation Websites
 
Evaluation Websites
Evaluation WebsitesEvaluation Websites
Evaluation Websites
 
Evaluation Websites
Evaluation WebsitesEvaluation Websites
Evaluation Websites
 
Research Presentation
Research PresentationResearch Presentation
Research Presentation
 
Assessing websites
Assessing websitesAssessing websites
Assessing websites
 
Evaluating sites for leap
Evaluating sites for leapEvaluating sites for leap
Evaluating sites for leap
 
375643 634074779366488750
375643 634074779366488750375643 634074779366488750
375643 634074779366488750
 
W13 libr250 evaluating and citing websites1
W13 libr250 evaluating and citing websites1W13 libr250 evaluating and citing websites1
W13 libr250 evaluating and citing websites1
 
Carol jones evaluating web sites
Carol jones evaluating web sitesCarol jones evaluating web sites
Carol jones evaluating web sites
 
Carol jones evaluating web sites
Carol jones evaluating web sitesCarol jones evaluating web sites
Carol jones evaluating web sites
 
Brody task7-power point
Brody task7-power pointBrody task7-power point
Brody task7-power point
 
Brody task7-power point
Brody task7-power pointBrody task7-power point
Brody task7-power point
 
Brody task7-power point
Brody task7-power pointBrody task7-power point
Brody task7-power point
 
Brody task7-power point
Brody task7-power pointBrody task7-power point
Brody task7-power point
 
Criteria
CriteriaCriteria
Criteria
 
Evaluating Websites
Evaluating WebsitesEvaluating Websites
Evaluating Websites
 
Information Evaluation
Information EvaluationInformation Evaluation
Information Evaluation
 

Presentation has Typo2

  • 3. Purpose (What and For Who?)  Why was the website created?  .edu and .gov sites are reliable  .com generally exist to sell you something  .org sites are okay as long as the purpose is not to convince that an opinion is fact  Who is the intended audience?  Is there a lot of advertising on the page = Be critical!
  • 4. Authority (Who?)  Is the author’s name easy to find?  Is the author an expert on the topic?  Is an About Us page included?  Does the website have a contact page?  .gov, .edu, or .org site?
  • 5. ABOUT US American Cancer Society http://www.cancer.org/
  • 6. Objectivity (Fact or Opinion?)  Why was the webpage created?  Is the information fact or just an opinion?  Look out for bias  Bias = an opinion formed without evidence, facts, or knowledge.  List of references?
  • 7. Currency (When?)  When was the webpage written?  When was the page last updated?  Medical and technology- dates are important  Literature and history topics- dates are less important
  • 8. Coverage(How Much?)  Is there enough information for your purpose?  Is the information provided appropriate for college research?  Can the same information be found from a more credible source? (book, encyclopedia, or journal article)
  • 9. Design (How?)  How is the information arranged?  Is it well organized?  Is the webpage free of spelling/grammar errors?
  • 10. A reliable website has:  Purpose. If your page was created to educate or help others and…  Authority. If your page lists the author credentials and its domain is preferred (.edu, .gov, .org, or .net) and…  Objectivity. If your page provides accurate information with limited advertising and it is objective in presenting the information, and . . .  Currency. If your page is current and updated regularly (as stated on the page) and the links (if any) are also up-to-date, and . . .  Coverage. If your page has enough information to suit your purpose, and …  Design If the information is well organized and free of errors then . . . IT HAS CREDIBILITY = A RELIABLE SOURCE OF INFORMATION!
  • 11. Work Cited Kapoun, Jim. "Teaching undergrads Web evaluation: A guide for library instruction." C&RL News (July/August 1998): 522-523.