DDU-GKY PROJECT, ORMAS: PIA RATING & GRADING TOOL QUESTIONNAIRE, AUGUST 2015
A. Evaluator Detail
Date of Visit PIA name PIA’s National
HQ
Name ofthe
Evaluator
Evaluator
Mobile
Number
Evaluator
email ID
Evaluator's Job Title Interview start
time
Interview end
time
B. PIA Detail
PIA State Office
Address
PRN Districts where
operational
Whethersingle
entityor
consortiumPIA
If consortium,
Lead PIA name
If consortium,
SecondaryPIA
name
Trainingtargetas
perthe MoU with
ORMAS
ProjectDuration Tradesof
Training
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
MoU Date with
ORMAS
Work
Commencement
date (postMoU)
Trainingstart
date (post
DD2)
Work
Commencement
date (postDD1)
Numberof training
centres runso far
Numberof
batchesrun so
far
Numberof
candidates
trained sofar
Numberof
candidates
placedso far
DETAILS of
RUNNING TCs
TC-1 TC-2 TC-3 TC-4 Total
District where TC is
located
Numberof running
batches inTC
Numberof
candidatesinall
runningbatchesof
TC
DDU-GKY PROJECT, ORMAS: PIA RATING & GRADING TOOL QUESTIONNAIRE, AUGUST 2015
C. InterviewQuestionnaire PART-1
Part-4 AssessmentofPIA with Residential TrainingFacilities:PlacementQuality(PIA-CT-1:
PQ)
InterviewCode PIA-CT-1
InterviewParameter
Code
PQ
Interviewstarttime Interview endtime
Interviewees(please
tickin the appropriate
box,can be more
than one)
Centre
in-charge
Trainers Trainees Q-team Ops-
team
PIA
state-
head
PIA
National
head
Parents Any
other
Documentschecked
Part-1
SN Parameter Total
Marks
Criteria for Grading Marks Marks
Secured
1. Total salary
receivedduring
placement
period
10 Sumof the total salaryreceivedduringthe months
whena candidatesistreatedasplaced
If 50% or more of the placedcandidatesgetsalary
more than the minimumsalary.
10
If 25% or more butlessthan50% of the placed
candidatesgetsalarymore than the minimumsalary.
5
If any numberof candidatesbetween1to 25% the
total placedcandidatesgetsalarymore than the
minimumsalary.
3
If no numberof candidatesoutof the total placed
candidatesgetsalarymore than the minimumsalary.
0
2. Paymentof
salaryto placed
candidates
10 Withpropersalary slipandstatutorybenefitsand
deductionsthroughbanktransaction
10
Withonly throughbank transaction 5
3. Nature of
placement-
Homogeneous
or hetrogeneos
(whether
placedinthe
same trade for
whichthe
candidate was
trainedor other
than that)
10 All placementishomogeneous 10
Anyinstance of heterogeneousplacement 0
4. BulkPlacement 10 BulkPlacement- Minimum21 -35 candidatesshould
be placedinone companyat one location(locationis
definedaspernotification26issuedbyMoRD)
10
DDU-GKY PROJECT, ORMAS: PIA RATING & GRADING TOOL QUESTIONNAIRE, AUGUST 2015
SN Parameter Total
Marks
Criteria for Grading Marks Marks
Secured
BulkPlacement- Minimum10-20 candidatesshouldbe
placedinone companyat one location(locationis
definedaspernotification26issuedbyMoRD)
5
5. Placement
percentage (%
of candidates
placedto those
whocompleted
training)
50 It isratio of placedto trained(fordefinionsee the last
column)
95 % and above butlessthan100 % 50
90 % and above butlessthan95 % 45
85 % and above butlessthan90 % 40
80 % and above butlessthan85 % 35
75 % and above butlessthan80 % 30
Lessthan 75 % 0
6. Foreign
Placement
5 Anydocumentedrecordof PIA'sinitiative tothisend
withrecordsof candidateshaving benefited fromthis.
5
7. Career
Progression
5 Anydocumentedrecordof PIA'sinitiative tothisend
withrecordsof candidateshavingbenefitedfromthis.
5
Total 100
D. InterviewQuestionnaire PART-2
Part-1 Assessmentand Scoring Pattern ofPIA with Residential Trainingfacility:Project
ExecutionQuality (PIA-CT-2:PEQ)
InterviewCode PIA-CT-2
InterviewParameter
Code
PEQ
Interviewstarttime Interview endtime
Interviewees(please
tickin the appropriate
box,can be more
than one)
PIA
National
head
PIA
state-
head
Centre
in-
charge/
manager
Q-team Ops-
team
Trainers Trainees Parents Any
other
Documentschecked
Part-2
SN Parameter Total
Marks
Criteriafor Grading Marks
Obtainable
Marks
Secured
1. Has the PIA opened
itsregional office in
Bhubaneswar?
10 Yes (openedoralreadythere) 10
No 0
2. Total numberof
alertsissued
10 0 10
1 - 9 5
10 > 0
3. Major Penalties 10 If it is zero 10
DDU-GKY PROJECT, ORMAS: PIA RATING & GRADING TOOL QUESTIONNAIRE, AUGUST 2015
>=1 0
4. Minor Penalties 10 If it is zero 10
1 - 5 5
>5 0
5. DDU-GKY reporting.
Reportingshouldbe
as per SOP
10 No.of delayare 0 10
1 - 5 5
>5 0
6. Training Target of a
Project
10 Training target of a project as per the sanction
order
Above 5000 10
3001-5000 7
1000- 3000 5
Less than 1000 0
7. TrainingTarget
achievementbythe
PIA
10 Above 90% 10
80%-89% 8
70%-79% 5
60%-69% 3
Lessthan 60% 0
8. Timely completionof
the project
10 Timely completion of the project as per sanction
order
10
9. Timelysubmissionof
financial reports
(Timleysubmission
of financial reports
as per chapter8 of
SOP)
10 All 10
90% or above but less than 100% 5
80% or above but less than 90% 3
Less than 80% 0
10. Money Invested By
PIA in the Project
10 15% or above of the project cost 10
10% - 14% 7
5%- 9% 3
Less than 5% 0
Total 100

Questionnaire PIA R&G Tool

  • 1.
    DDU-GKY PROJECT, ORMAS:PIA RATING & GRADING TOOL QUESTIONNAIRE, AUGUST 2015 A. Evaluator Detail Date of Visit PIA name PIA’s National HQ Name ofthe Evaluator Evaluator Mobile Number Evaluator email ID Evaluator's Job Title Interview start time Interview end time B. PIA Detail PIA State Office Address PRN Districts where operational Whethersingle entityor consortiumPIA If consortium, Lead PIA name If consortium, SecondaryPIA name Trainingtargetas perthe MoU with ORMAS ProjectDuration Tradesof Training 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. MoU Date with ORMAS Work Commencement date (postMoU) Trainingstart date (post DD2) Work Commencement date (postDD1) Numberof training centres runso far Numberof batchesrun so far Numberof candidates trained sofar Numberof candidates placedso far DETAILS of RUNNING TCs TC-1 TC-2 TC-3 TC-4 Total District where TC is located Numberof running batches inTC Numberof candidatesinall runningbatchesof TC
  • 2.
    DDU-GKY PROJECT, ORMAS:PIA RATING & GRADING TOOL QUESTIONNAIRE, AUGUST 2015 C. InterviewQuestionnaire PART-1 Part-4 AssessmentofPIA with Residential TrainingFacilities:PlacementQuality(PIA-CT-1: PQ) InterviewCode PIA-CT-1 InterviewParameter Code PQ Interviewstarttime Interview endtime Interviewees(please tickin the appropriate box,can be more than one) Centre in-charge Trainers Trainees Q-team Ops- team PIA state- head PIA National head Parents Any other Documentschecked Part-1 SN Parameter Total Marks Criteria for Grading Marks Marks Secured 1. Total salary receivedduring placement period 10 Sumof the total salaryreceivedduringthe months whena candidatesistreatedasplaced If 50% or more of the placedcandidatesgetsalary more than the minimumsalary. 10 If 25% or more butlessthan50% of the placed candidatesgetsalarymore than the minimumsalary. 5 If any numberof candidatesbetween1to 25% the total placedcandidatesgetsalarymore than the minimumsalary. 3 If no numberof candidatesoutof the total placed candidatesgetsalarymore than the minimumsalary. 0 2. Paymentof salaryto placed candidates 10 Withpropersalary slipandstatutorybenefitsand deductionsthroughbanktransaction 10 Withonly throughbank transaction 5 3. Nature of placement- Homogeneous or hetrogeneos (whether placedinthe same trade for whichthe candidate was trainedor other than that) 10 All placementishomogeneous 10 Anyinstance of heterogeneousplacement 0 4. BulkPlacement 10 BulkPlacement- Minimum21 -35 candidatesshould be placedinone companyat one location(locationis definedaspernotification26issuedbyMoRD) 10
  • 3.
    DDU-GKY PROJECT, ORMAS:PIA RATING & GRADING TOOL QUESTIONNAIRE, AUGUST 2015 SN Parameter Total Marks Criteria for Grading Marks Marks Secured BulkPlacement- Minimum10-20 candidatesshouldbe placedinone companyat one location(locationis definedaspernotification26issuedbyMoRD) 5 5. Placement percentage (% of candidates placedto those whocompleted training) 50 It isratio of placedto trained(fordefinionsee the last column) 95 % and above butlessthan100 % 50 90 % and above butlessthan95 % 45 85 % and above butlessthan90 % 40 80 % and above butlessthan85 % 35 75 % and above butlessthan80 % 30 Lessthan 75 % 0 6. Foreign Placement 5 Anydocumentedrecordof PIA'sinitiative tothisend withrecordsof candidateshaving benefited fromthis. 5 7. Career Progression 5 Anydocumentedrecordof PIA'sinitiative tothisend withrecordsof candidateshavingbenefitedfromthis. 5 Total 100 D. InterviewQuestionnaire PART-2 Part-1 Assessmentand Scoring Pattern ofPIA with Residential Trainingfacility:Project ExecutionQuality (PIA-CT-2:PEQ) InterviewCode PIA-CT-2 InterviewParameter Code PEQ Interviewstarttime Interview endtime Interviewees(please tickin the appropriate box,can be more than one) PIA National head PIA state- head Centre in- charge/ manager Q-team Ops- team Trainers Trainees Parents Any other Documentschecked Part-2 SN Parameter Total Marks Criteriafor Grading Marks Obtainable Marks Secured 1. Has the PIA opened itsregional office in Bhubaneswar? 10 Yes (openedoralreadythere) 10 No 0 2. Total numberof alertsissued 10 0 10 1 - 9 5 10 > 0 3. Major Penalties 10 If it is zero 10
  • 4.
    DDU-GKY PROJECT, ORMAS:PIA RATING & GRADING TOOL QUESTIONNAIRE, AUGUST 2015 >=1 0 4. Minor Penalties 10 If it is zero 10 1 - 5 5 >5 0 5. DDU-GKY reporting. Reportingshouldbe as per SOP 10 No.of delayare 0 10 1 - 5 5 >5 0 6. Training Target of a Project 10 Training target of a project as per the sanction order Above 5000 10 3001-5000 7 1000- 3000 5 Less than 1000 0 7. TrainingTarget achievementbythe PIA 10 Above 90% 10 80%-89% 8 70%-79% 5 60%-69% 3 Lessthan 60% 0 8. Timely completionof the project 10 Timely completion of the project as per sanction order 10 9. Timelysubmissionof financial reports (Timleysubmission of financial reports as per chapter8 of SOP) 10 All 10 90% or above but less than 100% 5 80% or above but less than 90% 3 Less than 80% 0 10. Money Invested By PIA in the Project 10 15% or above of the project cost 10 10% - 14% 7 5%- 9% 3 Less than 5% 0 Total 100