This document discusses self-citation abuse in academic proceedings. It provides examples of one researcher who excessively self-cited their own work in proceedings publications and published the same papers across multiple venues. Specifically, the researcher included 40+ self-citations out of 49 total references in one paper and published the same content in proceedings and journals. The document argues that proceedings allow easy abuse through self-citation and duplicate publication in order to artificially inflate metrics like citation counts and h-index. It recommends limiting the number of references and percentage of self-citations allowed in proceedings to prevent this type of opportunistic behavior.