Source: Proton’s Annual Reports PROTON’S PERFORMANCE OVER THE YEARS Wan Nik, Iwabuchi, Hattori Nadzmi Tengku Mahaleel Azlan, Nadzmi, Syed Zainal ECONOMIC CRISIS FINANCIAL CRISIS EXCHANGE CONTROL FINANCIAL CRISIS NEW NAP Production/Sales  Volume : Period of 2006  – 2011 vs.  Period of 1996 – 2005, remained relatively similar i.e. no improvement despite significant  increases in overheads, ~ 2 to 3 fold increases. New Products viz. the Saga and Persona were developed towards the latter Period of 1996 – 2005 and were realized in 2006, The Exora were approved and budgeted within the same period. Similarly, the Improvements for the CamPro Engine viz. IAFM and CPS were developed within the latter  Period of 1996 - 2005 in time for the Saga, Persona and Exora Models. Clearly evident that the most Productive Period in Proton’s History was within 1996 – 2005. Numerous New Models Programmes were hatched within this period and realized from 2006 onwards!
Source: Proton’s Annual Reports PROTON’S PERFORMANCE OVER THE YEARS Proton had Produced in excess of 3.6 Million Vehicles (Domestic + Export + CKD Exports + Local Contract Assembly (AMI and AMM) 485,539 Vehicles 13% of Cumulative Total Average ~ 61K/Year 406,997 Vehicles 11% of Cumulative Total Average ~ 136K/Year 1,053,290 Vehicles 29% of Cumulative Total Average ~  150K/Year 1,655,289 Vehicles 46% of Cumulative Total Average ~ 184K/Year
Source: Proton’s Annual Reports PROTON’S PERFORMANCE OVER THE YEARS The most successful models for The Main Plant (Shah Alam) were the 1 st  Generation Saga, Wira (Sedan and Aeroback), Waja and the 2 nd  Generation Saga.
Source: Proton’s Annual Reports PROTON’S PERFORMANCE OVER THE YEARS The most successful model for The Tg. Malim Plant was the Persona.
PROTON’S PERFORMANCE OVER THE YEARS Wan Nik, Iwabuchi, Hattori Nadzmi Tengku Mahaleel Azlan, Nadzmi, Syed Zainal Period Turnover : Period of 2006  – 2011 vs.  Period of 1996 – 2005, remained relatively similar. Source: Proton’s Annual Reports PBT: Period of 2006  – 2011 vs.  Period of 1996 – 2005 has deteriorated even with the inclusion of Government Grants from 2008 onwards. % of PBT / Turnover: Period of 2006  – 2011 vs.  Period of 1996 – 2005 has deteriorated drastically!
PROTON’S PERFORMANCE OVER THE YEARS Executive Directors’ Emolument was not reflective of Company’s Performance. Annual increases > 50% vs. Reduction in Margins was not compatible. Source: Proton’s Annual Reports Similarly, the Non-Executive Director’s Emolument was not reflective of Company's Performance. Annual increases of > 50%% vs. Reduction in Margins was not compatible.

Proton performance over the years

  • 1.
    Source: Proton’s AnnualReports PROTON’S PERFORMANCE OVER THE YEARS Wan Nik, Iwabuchi, Hattori Nadzmi Tengku Mahaleel Azlan, Nadzmi, Syed Zainal ECONOMIC CRISIS FINANCIAL CRISIS EXCHANGE CONTROL FINANCIAL CRISIS NEW NAP Production/Sales Volume : Period of 2006 – 2011 vs. Period of 1996 – 2005, remained relatively similar i.e. no improvement despite significant increases in overheads, ~ 2 to 3 fold increases. New Products viz. the Saga and Persona were developed towards the latter Period of 1996 – 2005 and were realized in 2006, The Exora were approved and budgeted within the same period. Similarly, the Improvements for the CamPro Engine viz. IAFM and CPS were developed within the latter Period of 1996 - 2005 in time for the Saga, Persona and Exora Models. Clearly evident that the most Productive Period in Proton’s History was within 1996 – 2005. Numerous New Models Programmes were hatched within this period and realized from 2006 onwards!
  • 2.
    Source: Proton’s AnnualReports PROTON’S PERFORMANCE OVER THE YEARS Proton had Produced in excess of 3.6 Million Vehicles (Domestic + Export + CKD Exports + Local Contract Assembly (AMI and AMM) 485,539 Vehicles 13% of Cumulative Total Average ~ 61K/Year 406,997 Vehicles 11% of Cumulative Total Average ~ 136K/Year 1,053,290 Vehicles 29% of Cumulative Total Average ~ 150K/Year 1,655,289 Vehicles 46% of Cumulative Total Average ~ 184K/Year
  • 3.
    Source: Proton’s AnnualReports PROTON’S PERFORMANCE OVER THE YEARS The most successful models for The Main Plant (Shah Alam) were the 1 st Generation Saga, Wira (Sedan and Aeroback), Waja and the 2 nd Generation Saga.
  • 4.
    Source: Proton’s AnnualReports PROTON’S PERFORMANCE OVER THE YEARS The most successful model for The Tg. Malim Plant was the Persona.
  • 5.
    PROTON’S PERFORMANCE OVERTHE YEARS Wan Nik, Iwabuchi, Hattori Nadzmi Tengku Mahaleel Azlan, Nadzmi, Syed Zainal Period Turnover : Period of 2006 – 2011 vs. Period of 1996 – 2005, remained relatively similar. Source: Proton’s Annual Reports PBT: Period of 2006 – 2011 vs. Period of 1996 – 2005 has deteriorated even with the inclusion of Government Grants from 2008 onwards. % of PBT / Turnover: Period of 2006 – 2011 vs. Period of 1996 – 2005 has deteriorated drastically!
  • 6.
    PROTON’S PERFORMANCE OVERTHE YEARS Executive Directors’ Emolument was not reflective of Company’s Performance. Annual increases > 50% vs. Reduction in Margins was not compatible. Source: Proton’s Annual Reports Similarly, the Non-Executive Director’s Emolument was not reflective of Company's Performance. Annual increases of > 50%% vs. Reduction in Margins was not compatible.