Prospective Collection
Development: Impacts on Library
         Collaboration



  SHARED PRINT ARCHIVING PRECONFERENCE
         CHARLESTON CONFERENCE
             NOVEMBER 2, 2011
          MICHAEL LEVINE-CLARK
          COLLECTIONS LIBRARIAN
           UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
      MICHAEL.LEVINE-CLARK@DU.EDU
Monographs

 Journals are easy
   Digital

   Shared

   Are the few print titles worth considering?
Looking into the Future

 5 years
   Print/electronic mix – still transitional
   DDA predominant for e-books

 10 years
   Mostly electronic
   Mostly DDA
   Local POD

 How actively will we still collect print?
What Do E-Book Collections Mean?

 Easier cooperation within consortia
   Shared access to shared purchases

 No shared access beyond consortia
   Depletion of the collective collection

   ILL replaced by STL
Demand-Driven Acquisition

 Is there a role for consortia?
   Tension between shared discount/local needs

 Immediate access vs. stewardship of
 the cultural record
  Access
   Better   served by DDA
  Stewardship   of potential acquisitions
And What About Print?

 Copies for sharing? Copies for
 preservation?
  Bundled with e-book purchases?
  Who stores?
  Who pays?
 Some stuff will always be print -
 opportunities
  Specialcollections
  Non-English
  Small Press
Thank You

Prospective Collection Development: Impacts on Library Collaboration

  • 1.
    Prospective Collection Development: Impactson Library Collaboration SHARED PRINT ARCHIVING PRECONFERENCE CHARLESTON CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 2, 2011 MICHAEL LEVINE-CLARK COLLECTIONS LIBRARIAN UNIVERSITY OF DENVER MICHAEL.LEVINE-CLARK@DU.EDU
  • 2.
    Monographs  Journals areeasy  Digital  Shared  Are the few print titles worth considering?
  • 3.
    Looking into theFuture  5 years  Print/electronic mix – still transitional  DDA predominant for e-books  10 years  Mostly electronic  Mostly DDA  Local POD  How actively will we still collect print?
  • 4.
    What Do E-BookCollections Mean?  Easier cooperation within consortia  Shared access to shared purchases  No shared access beyond consortia  Depletion of the collective collection  ILL replaced by STL
  • 5.
    Demand-Driven Acquisition  Isthere a role for consortia?  Tension between shared discount/local needs  Immediate access vs. stewardship of the cultural record  Access Better served by DDA  Stewardship of potential acquisitions
  • 6.
    And What AboutPrint?  Copies for sharing? Copies for preservation?  Bundled with e-book purchases?  Who stores?  Who pays?  Some stuff will always be print - opportunities  Specialcollections  Non-English  Small Press
  • 7.