A PROJECT REPORT ON BRAND
AWARENESS MOTOROLA HANDSET IN
             GIM

       A mini project work submitted to Guruvayurappan Institute ofManagement




                                Submitted by

                            AJAY.P.SEKHAR
                            Under the Guidance of

              Mr.M. Jeganathan,MSc., PGDCA.,
                                     &

Mrs. C.V. Suganthamani, MBE., M.Phil.
TABLE OF CONTENT
CH.1   INTRODUCTION
1.1    INTRODUCTION
1.2    OBJECTIVE OF STUDY
1.3    SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY
1.4    COMPANY PROFILE
CH.2   RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1    SAMPLE DESIGN
2.2    SAMPLE SIZE
2.3    SAMPLING AREA
2.4    DATA COLLECTION METHODS
2.5    TOOLS USED FOR STUDY
2.6    LIMITATION OF STUDY
CH.3   DATA ANALYSIS &
       INTERPRETATION
CH.4   FINDINGS & CONCLUSION
4.1    FINDINGS
4.2    CONCLUSION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
      The technology that gives a person to person to power to
communication anytime, anywhere has spawned a entire industry in
mobile telecommunication. Mobile has become an integral part of the
growth, success & efficiency of any business/ economy.
             Mobile industry is the fastest growing & well flourished in
today market scenario. A project done is meant to study the
effectiveness of brand Motorola among the students of GIM. The
primary focus is on the valuation of Motorola brand value & satisfaction
of users who has used the Motorola product. My research will help the
telecom industry to know the current scenario of customers with respect
to brand preference of mobile phones, with respect to Motorola.

1.2 OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
     PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
     Brand awareness among the students of the GIM.

     SECONDARY OBJECTIVE
          Performance of the products of Motorola.
          To find the expectation of the students from the
          Motorola mobile.
          To find out the draw backs of the Motorola products.
1.3 SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY
     My research will help the telecom industry to know the current
     scenario of customer with respect to Motorola.
1.4 COMPANY PROFILE
 FATE : Divided into Motorola Mobility & Motorola solution
 FOUNDED :Sept 25, 1928.
 DEFUNCT: January 4,2011
HEADQUATER: Schaumburg Illinois, United States.
KEY PEOPLE: Don Maloney (PRESIDENT)
              Sanjay Jha (CEO&CHAIRPERSON)
PRODUCTS: Tablet computers,
           Mobile Phones,
           Cable television system,
           RFID Systems &
           Mobile Telephone Infrastructure.
WEBSITE: www.motrola.com
CH. 2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
 2.1 SAMPLE DESIGN
     The sample design used for the survey was simple random
sampling.



2.2 SAMPLE SIZE
   The sample size for the survey 15.

2.3 SAMPLING AREA
 The sampling area for the survey was GIM campus.



2.4 DATA COLLECTION METHOD
   PRIMARY DATA
  The primary data has been used by me is Questionnaire &
Observation method.
 - It is two basic method of collecting data for primary data.
 - The questionnaire was consist 12 question.
2.5 TOOLS USED FOR DATA COLLECTION
PERCENTAGE METHOD
 Percentage refers to special kind of ratio. Percentages are used for
making comparisons between two or more series of data. Percentages
can also be used to compare the relative terms.




2.6 LIMITATION OF STUDY
   A sample size of 15 customers was considered due lack of time &
    resources.

  The scope of the project is limited to the GIM campus. So we
     cannot say that the same response will be there about the product.
CH. 3 DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION
 Analysis based on the questionnaire
    Aware of brand “Motorola”


  Aware              14            93
  Not aware          1             7
  Total              15            100


 Inference:
        93% are aware of the brand Motorola.
     Is after sales service important

    Very important        10        66.67%
    Important             5         33.33%
    Not important         -         -
    Total                 15        100


    Inference:
           66.67% agree that after sales
    important for mobile industry.
Brand reputation of Motorola in terms of
promotion
Excellent      -              -
Very good      5              33.33%
Good           6              40%
Satisfied      4              26.67%
Poor           -              -
Total          15             100


Inference:
    40% says that brand promotion is good of
Motorola.
Brand value of Motorola phones in terms of
money
Excellent      2              13.33%
Very good      3              20
Good           7              46.67%
Satisfied      3              20%
Poor           -              -
Total          15             100

Inference:
  46.67% says that Motorola phones have
good value for money.
CH. 4 FINDINGS &CONCLUSION
4.1 FINDINGS
    100% students are using mobile phones.
    93% are aware of the brand Motorola & 7% are not aware of
    brand Motorola.
    46.67% are changing their mobile handset within 6months,
    26.67% are changing more than yearly.
     86.67% respondent buy through dealers & remaining 13.33%
    buy from others.
    66.67% respondent says that after sales service is very
    important for mobile industry & 33.33% is says that it is
    important.
    40% of respondent says that Motorola brand promotion is good,
    33.33% is very good & 26.67% are satisfied with promotion.
    46.67% of respondent says that Motorola mobile phones have
    good value for money for their product.

4.2 CONCLUSION
    The methodology adopted for the study is simple random
      sampling for that I have selected 15 samples. The data
      collected by using questionnaire.
 Here by I can conclude from this research that Nokia has the
  maximum brand preference as compare to other brand in the
  GIM campus.
 Motorola has to improve their quality of the product.
 Most of respondent more give importance to after sales
  service.

Project on motrola handset

  • 1.
    A PROJECT REPORTON BRAND AWARENESS MOTOROLA HANDSET IN GIM A mini project work submitted to Guruvayurappan Institute ofManagement Submitted by AJAY.P.SEKHAR Under the Guidance of Mr.M. Jeganathan,MSc., PGDCA., & Mrs. C.V. Suganthamani, MBE., M.Phil.
  • 2.
    TABLE OF CONTENT CH.1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 OBJECTIVE OF STUDY 1.3 SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY 1.4 COMPANY PROFILE CH.2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 2.1 SAMPLE DESIGN 2.2 SAMPLE SIZE 2.3 SAMPLING AREA 2.4 DATA COLLECTION METHODS 2.5 TOOLS USED FOR STUDY 2.6 LIMITATION OF STUDY CH.3 DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION CH.4 FINDINGS & CONCLUSION 4.1 FINDINGS 4.2 CONCLUSION
  • 3.
    1.1 INTRODUCTION The technology that gives a person to person to power to communication anytime, anywhere has spawned a entire industry in mobile telecommunication. Mobile has become an integral part of the growth, success & efficiency of any business/ economy. Mobile industry is the fastest growing & well flourished in today market scenario. A project done is meant to study the effectiveness of brand Motorola among the students of GIM. The primary focus is on the valuation of Motorola brand value & satisfaction of users who has used the Motorola product. My research will help the telecom industry to know the current scenario of customers with respect to brand preference of mobile phones, with respect to Motorola. 1.2 OBJECTIVES OF STUDY PRIMARY OBJECTIVE Brand awareness among the students of the GIM. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE Performance of the products of Motorola. To find the expectation of the students from the Motorola mobile. To find out the draw backs of the Motorola products. 1.3 SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY My research will help the telecom industry to know the current scenario of customer with respect to Motorola.
  • 4.
    1.4 COMPANY PROFILE FATE : Divided into Motorola Mobility & Motorola solution FOUNDED :Sept 25, 1928. DEFUNCT: January 4,2011 HEADQUATER: Schaumburg Illinois, United States. KEY PEOPLE: Don Maloney (PRESIDENT) Sanjay Jha (CEO&CHAIRPERSON) PRODUCTS: Tablet computers, Mobile Phones, Cable television system, RFID Systems & Mobile Telephone Infrastructure. WEBSITE: www.motrola.com
  • 5.
    CH. 2 RESEARCHMETHODOLOGY 2.1 SAMPLE DESIGN The sample design used for the survey was simple random sampling. 2.2 SAMPLE SIZE The sample size for the survey 15. 2.3 SAMPLING AREA The sampling area for the survey was GIM campus. 2.4 DATA COLLECTION METHOD PRIMARY DATA The primary data has been used by me is Questionnaire & Observation method. - It is two basic method of collecting data for primary data. - The questionnaire was consist 12 question.
  • 6.
    2.5 TOOLS USEDFOR DATA COLLECTION PERCENTAGE METHOD Percentage refers to special kind of ratio. Percentages are used for making comparisons between two or more series of data. Percentages can also be used to compare the relative terms. 2.6 LIMITATION OF STUDY  A sample size of 15 customers was considered due lack of time & resources. The scope of the project is limited to the GIM campus. So we cannot say that the same response will be there about the product.
  • 7.
    CH. 3 DATAANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION Analysis based on the questionnaire Aware of brand “Motorola” Aware 14 93 Not aware 1 7 Total 15 100 Inference: 93% are aware of the brand Motorola. Is after sales service important Very important 10 66.67% Important 5 33.33% Not important - - Total 15 100 Inference: 66.67% agree that after sales important for mobile industry.
  • 8.
    Brand reputation ofMotorola in terms of promotion Excellent - - Very good 5 33.33% Good 6 40% Satisfied 4 26.67% Poor - - Total 15 100 Inference: 40% says that brand promotion is good of Motorola. Brand value of Motorola phones in terms of money Excellent 2 13.33% Very good 3 20 Good 7 46.67% Satisfied 3 20% Poor - - Total 15 100 Inference: 46.67% says that Motorola phones have good value for money.
  • 9.
    CH. 4 FINDINGS&CONCLUSION 4.1 FINDINGS 100% students are using mobile phones. 93% are aware of the brand Motorola & 7% are not aware of brand Motorola. 46.67% are changing their mobile handset within 6months, 26.67% are changing more than yearly. 86.67% respondent buy through dealers & remaining 13.33% buy from others. 66.67% respondent says that after sales service is very important for mobile industry & 33.33% is says that it is important. 40% of respondent says that Motorola brand promotion is good, 33.33% is very good & 26.67% are satisfied with promotion. 46.67% of respondent says that Motorola mobile phones have good value for money for their product. 4.2 CONCLUSION The methodology adopted for the study is simple random sampling for that I have selected 15 samples. The data collected by using questionnaire.
  • 10.
     Here byI can conclude from this research that Nokia has the maximum brand preference as compare to other brand in the GIM campus.  Motorola has to improve their quality of the product.  Most of respondent more give importance to after sales service.