2. Volume 42, Number 2/April 2020 55
Effects of Paricalcitol on Renal Injury
ease models, animal; ischemia-reperfusion injury;
kidney; oxidative stress; paricalcitol; rats, Sprague-
Dawley; reperfusion injury.
Acute kidney injury is described as a sudden
decline of the kidney functions over a period of
hours to days or weeks, resulting in the accu
mulation of nitrogenous waste products such as
blood urea nitrogen and creatinine. Acute kidney
injury is prevalent among patients admitted to
hospital, particularly among those patients in the
intensive care unit.1
Several clinical conditions can cause acute kid-
ney injury; among them, renal ischemia/reperfu-
sion (I/R) injury is known to be one of the most
common. Several clinical situations, such as partial
nephrectomy, shock, sepsis, major vascular sur-
gery, kidney transplantation, and certain hypoten
sive states are common causes of renal reperfu-
sion injury.2 I/R injury may cause delayed graft
function and renal graft rejection during renal
transplantation.3-5
Despite the fact that reperfusion of ischemic
tissue is vitally important for preventing irrever-
sible cellular injury, reperfusion itself may also
cause additional tissue injury, even more than that
generated by ischemia alone.6,7 Oxidative stress
seems to be a prominent cause of renal I/R in
jury, although the pathogenesis has not been com
pletely elucidated.6 Reactive oxygen species (ROS)
formed in a high concentration during I/R injury.8
A disequilibrium between ROS generation and re-
moval ability of their toxic effects by our antioxi-
dant capacity causes oxidative stress.9
Novel selective vitamin D receptor agonist pari-
calcitol is commonly used for secondary hyper
parathyroidism therapy with fewer side effects
on serum calcium and phosphorus.10,11 Beyond its
well known effects on bone mineral metabolism,
paricalcitol has been shown to exert antioxidant
and antiinflammatory effects.12 Numerous studies
have shown that paricalcitol attenuates kidney
injury, proteinuria interstitial fibrosis, and renal
inflammation.13-16
In this study, we examined the efficacy of par-
icalcitol on kidney function disturbances, oxida-
tive stress, and histological damage in renal is-
chemia/reperfusion injury.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Twenty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats were en-
rolled in this experimental study, each weighing
180–250 g. Rat food as well as water ad libitum
were given to the animals, and they were kept
under standardized conditions. Approval was ob-
tained from the local committee on animal research
ethics of the School of Medicine, Dicle University.
Experimental Protocol and Groups
Twenty-eight rats were assigned to 4 groups, each
containing 7 animals:
• Group 1 (control): Rats in this group received
saline solution 0.9% intraperitoneally once a day
for 5 days (the same as the paricalcitol dose).
Rats in the group were not exposed to ische-
mia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Blood and kidney
tissue samples were taken after laparotomy on
the sixth day.
• Group 2 (paricalcitol): Intraperitoneal 0.3 μg/kg
paricalcitol was administered to rats once a day
for 5 days. Rats in this group were not exposed
to ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Blood and
kidney tissue samples were taken after laparo-
tomy on the sixth day.
• Group 3 (ischemia/reperfusion [I/R]): Rats in this
group received saline solution 0.9% intraper
itoneally once a day for 5 days (same as the
paricalcitol dose). After right nephrectomy, rats
were exposed to ischemia/reperfusion (60 min
utes left renal artery occlusion, then 60 minutes
reperfusion period) on day 6. Blood and left
kidney tissue samples were taken after 1 hour
of reperfusion period.
• Group 4 (paricalcitol+I/R): Intraperitoneal 0.3 μg/
kg paricalcitol was administered to rats once a
day for 5 days. After right nephrectomy, rats
were exposed to ischemia/reperfusion (60 min
utes left renal artery occlusion, then 60 minutes
reperfusion period) on the sixth day. Blood
and left kidney tissue samples were taken after
1 hour of reperfusion period.
Xylazine (10 mg/kg) and ketamine (70 mg/kg)
were given to all of the rats for anesthesia by in-
tramuscular route. After antisepsis with povidone-
iodine, the anterior abdominal was opened by
local midline incision. Right nephrectomy was per
formed and then, with atraumatic vascular clamp
placed on the left renal artery, blood flow was
cut off and a 60-minute ischemia was started.
The clamp was removed after the ischemia stage,
then reperfusion was started (kidney color change
followed up 2 minutes after the clamp was re-
3. 56 Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology®
Aydin et al
moved). The incision was closed and cleaned with
povidone. Subcutaneous 2 mL saline was given to
correct fluid loss during the surgical operation.
As a result of the ischemia-reperfusion per-
formed, all of the rats were sacrificed through
intracardiac puncture, and the left kidneys were
harvested. Blood samples were centrifuged, and
plasma samples taken were kept at −70°C imme
diately until assayed. Kidneys were divided into
major structures from the pelvis for histopatholo
gical evaluation and laboratory analysis (stored at
−70°C until biochemical analysis).
Evaluation of Renal Function
An Aeroset C16000 analyzer (Abbott, Chicago,
Illinois, USA) was used for measurement of serum
urea and creatinine.
Biochemical Analysis
Tissue samples were first homogenized by a ho
mogenizer after weighing the tissues. Serum and
kidney tissue specimens were examined for oxi
dant (malondialdehyde, total oxidant status [TOS])
and antioxidant parameters (nitric oxide, para-
oxonase, and total antioxidant capacity [TAC]).
Malondialdehyde was determined with the thio-
barbituric acid method.17 TOS18 and TAC19 were
determined through use of a new measurement
method developed by Erel. Paraoxonase and ni-
tric oxide were measured by employing available
kits.20
Histopathological Evaluation
Histopathological evaluations were performed un-
der a light microscope. The kidneys were fixed in
10% formaldehyde, then inserted to paraffin. Five
μm sample sections were obtained for staining by
using periodic acid–Schiff and hematoxylin and
eosin. The following histological parameters were
examined with respect to morphological kidney
damage: tubular necrosis and atrophy, hydropic
degeneration, regenerative atypia, interstitial fibro-
sis, and loss of brush border.21 The analysis was
performed with the sum of the individual scores
(0 to 3): no findings (0), mild (1), moderate (2), and
severe (3) for kidney.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS),
Version 18.0 for Windows, was employed to per-
form data analyses. All of the data were reported
with mean±standard deviation. One-way analysis
of variance (ANOVA) with a post-hoc Bonferroni
correction was performed for multiple group com-
parison. P<0.05 was considered statistically signi-
ficant.
Results
As compared to control and paricalcitol group
animals, those animals that underwent renal is-
chemia were detected to have significantly higher
serum creatinine and urea levels (p<0.05). Serum
urea and creatinine levels exhibited significant
decrease in rats treated with paricalcitol before
ischemia reperfusion as compared to rats exposed
to ischemia reperfusion alone (p<0.001). Table I
shows the renal function tests of the groups.
In comparing the paricalcitol+I/R group with
the I/R group, we found that serum TOS levels
decreased significantly, whereas serum TAC and
nitric oxide levels increased considerably with
paricalcitol administration. Malondialdehyde and
TOS levels of kidney tissue were significantly
lower, whereas TAC and paraoxonase levels were
detected to be meaningfully higher in the parical
citol+I/R group with respect to the I/R group.
Table II illustrates the oxidant as well as antioxi-
dant parameters of the study groups.
Table I Effect of Paricalcitol on Renal Function Tests in the Rats According to Group
Group
Control Paricalcitol I/R Paricalcitol+I/R
Parameter (n=7) (n=7) (n=7) (n=7)
Serum
Urea (mg/dL) 28.57±7.80 28.14±4.01 130.60±20.68a,b 75.28±14.02a,b,c
Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.38±0.07 0.36±0.03 1.21±0.21a,b 0.79±0.09a,b,c
ap<0.001 in comparison with the control group.
bp<0.001 in comparison with the paricalcitol group.
cp<0.001 in comparison with the I/R group.
4. Volume 42, Number 2/April 2020 57
Effects of Paricalcitol on Renal Injury
As illustrated in Table III, the renal tissue injury
scores were found to be considerably higher in
the I/R group with respect to the paricalcitol+I/R
group (12.00±1.15 vs. 9.42±0.97, p<0.001). Kidney
light microscopy images of the groups are shown
in Figure 1.
Discussion
Despite advances in critical care medicine, acute
kidney injury is still an important healthcare chal-
lenge throughout the world. The prevalence of
acute kidney injury has increased over the last
decade and is expected to double during the fol-
lowing 10 years.22,23 Moreover, morbidity and mor-
tality of acute kidney injury is observed to have
increased. Ischemia caused by decreased renal per-
fusion is one of the common causes of acute
kidney injury in hospitalized patients. Although
many pharmacological and nonpharmacological
substances against renal I/R injury have been ex-
amined, current treatment for ischemic acute kid-
ney injury is mainly supportive, including renal
replacement therapy. Thus, more convenient and
reliable therapies are necessary.
Paricalcitol is a third generation and selective
vitamin D receptor activator which has also been
shown to have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant
effects. Paricalcitol demonstrated renoprotective
effects in several renal injury models. Park et al
reported that paricalcitol has beneficial effect for
preventing gentamicin-induced renal injury by
ameliorating renal inflammation and fibrosis.24 It
has also been reported that paricalcitol may im-
prove cisplatin-induced renal injury by decreas-
ing the apoptotic, fibrotic, and proliferative fac-
tors.25 In a study conducted by Tanaka et al in a
relatively small number of hemodialysis patients,
the treatment with a vitamin D receptor activa-
Table II Oxidant and Antioxidant Parameters of Serum and Kidney Tissue in the Study Groups
Group
Control Paricalcitol I/R Paricalcitol+I/R
Parameter (n=7) (n=7) (n=7) (n=7)
Serum
MDA (mmol/mL) 4.53±3.35 5.81±3.12 63.83±17.76d,e 48.40±12.05d,e
TOS (µmol/L) 44.33±7.14 99.80±28.24 310.09±106.84d,e
184.24±43.11a,c
TAC (mmol/L) 0.97±0.13 1.07±0.15 1.03±0.17 2.29±0.72a,b,c
NO (µM) 25.60±8.39 21.50±6.41 32.80±10.12 65.01±13.74d,e,f
Paraoxonase (U/L) 86.02±13.22
107.57±50.75
155.10±49.07 204.63±59.41b,d
Kidney tissue
MDA (mmol/mL) 19.91±5.32 29.19±10.99 108.20±25.64d,e 70.44±21.09b,c,d
TOS (µmol/L) 80.43±7.86 100.96±12.22 225.07±64.93d,e 134.30±53.47c,d,e
TAC (mmol/L) 4.96±1.30
4.84±0.74
3.48±0.63 7.43±3.02c
NO (µM) 69.07±11.38 95.77±30.40 146.12±43.28a 213.03±71.64d,e
Paraoxonase (U/L) 54.47±8.97 67.23±10.85 87.44±13.17a 117.76±22.01c,d
MDA = malondialdehyde, NO = nitric oxide, TAC = total antioxidant capacity, TOS = total oxidant status.
ap<0.05 in comparison with the control group.
bp<0.05 in comparison with the paricalcitol group.
cp<0.05 in comparison with the I/R group.
dp<0.001 in comparison with the control group.
ep<0.001 in comparison with the paricalcitol group.
fp<0.001 in comparison with the I/R group.
Table III Renal Histopathological Scores of the Groups
Control Paricalcitol I/R Paricalcitol+I/R
Group (n=7) (n=7) (n=7) (n=7)
Total score Ø Ø
12.00±1.15a,b 9.42±0.97a,b,c
ap<0.001 in comparison with the control group.
bp<0.001 in comparison with the paricalcitol group.
cp<0.001 in comparison with the I/R group.
5. 58 Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology®
Aydin et al
tor reduced oxidative stress.26 In an experimental
study, Ari et al reported the protective effect of
paricalcitol in contrast-induced nephropathy by de-
creasing the systemic and renal oxidative stress.27
The effectiveness of paricalcitol against ischemia/
reperfusion injury on the kidney was examined by
Hwang et al in mice. They concluded that pretreat-
ment with paricalcitol prevents renal ischemia/
reperfusion injury by the inhibition of renal inflam-
mation.28 Recently, Lee et al also demonstrated the
renoprotective effect of paricalcitol in ischemic
acute kidney injury by attenuating inflammation.29
In another experimental study by Azak et al, the
effect of paricalcitol was evaluated on renal I/R
injury.3 Paricalcitol pretreatment showed an im-
provement in terms of oxidant parameters, antiox-
idant parameters, creatinine levels, and in histopa-
thology, suggesting that paricalcitol is efficacious
in terms of preventing renal I/R injury. Com-
patible with the findings of previous works, our
study showed that pretreatment with paricalcitol
attenuated renal I/R injury by indicating a major
reduction in the serum urea and creatinine levels.
I/R injury is defined as cellular damage after
reperfusion of ischemic tissues.6 Although several
factors are associated with renal I/R injury, oxi
dative stress due to an imbalance between the
oxidative system and the antioxidative defense
system has a substantial role in reperfusion injury
pathogenesis. During ischemia, the catabolic de-
gradation of ATP ensures hypoxanthine. It is
normally oxidized to xanthine with xanthine de-
hydrogenase.6 Together with ischemia, xanthine
dehydrogenase is transformed to xanthine oxi-
dase. On the other hand, xanthine oxidase can-
not transform hypoxanthine to xanthine because
of oxygen required in this process. Oxygen is
reintroduced after restoration of reperfusion, and
accumulated hypoxanthine is transformed by the
xanthine oxidase, resulting in toxic ROS produc-
tion.2,6 Excessive production of ROS which causes
oxidative stress is highly damaging and can also
lead to cellular injury. ROS is counteracted by local
antioxidant enzymes; however, overproduction of
ROS can overwhelm antioxidant defenses during
reperfusion.30 Malondialdehyde is an end product
Figure 1
Kidney histopathological
findings of the study groups
(hematoxylin and eosin
staining, original magnification,
×200). Normal histology in
(A) Group 1 (control),
(B) Group 2 (paricalcitol),
(C) Group 3 (I/R), and
(D) Group 4 (paricalcitol+I/R).
6. Volume 42, Number 2/April 2020 59
Effects of Paricalcitol on Renal Injury
of lipid peroxidation, which has also been seen to
increase in I/R injury.27
Since renal I/R injury is closely concerned with
oxidative stress, we focused on the oxidant and
antioxidant parameters. Our study showed that
paricalcitol pretreatment led to a major decrease
for serum-kidney TOS and kidney malondialde
hyde levels and a major increase in serum-kidney
TAC, serum nitric oxide levels, and kidney para-
oxonase levels. Consistent with the findings of
Azak et al, our results also demonstrated the
useful effect of paricalcitol as the pretreatment
against oxidative stress in renal I/R injury.
Moreover, our study has also revealed that
paricalcitol pretreatment results not only in im-
proved renal function, but also in histopatholo-
gical findings by exhibiting significantly lower
renal tissue injury scores in the paricalcitol+I/R
group with respect to the I/R group.
In conclusion, our study has shown that prior
treatment with paricalcitol is effective in reduc
ing renal injury after renal ischemia/reperfusion,
which has been observed by improvement in
renal functions and histopathology. We are of the
opinion that these effects are attributable to the
beneficial effects of paricalcitol against oxidative
stress.
References
1. Bellomo R, Kellum JA, Ronco C: Acute kidney injury. Lancet
2012;380(9843):756-766
2. Wu K, Lei W, Tian J, Li H: Atorvastatin treatment attenu-
ates renal injury in an experimental model of ischemia-
reperfusion in rats. BMC Nephrol 2014;15:14
3. Azak A, Huddam B, Haberal N, Koçak G, Ortabozkoyun
L, Şenes M, Akdoğan MF, Denizli N, Duranay M: Effect
of novel vitamin D receptor activator paricalcitol on renal
ischaemia/reperfusion injury in rats. Ann R Coll Surg Engl
2013;95(7):489-494
4. Pirsch JD, Ploeg RJ, Gange S, D’Alessandro AM, Knechtle
SJ, Sollinger HW, Kalayoglu M, Belzer FO: Determinants of
graft survival after renal transplantation. Transplantation
1996;61(11):1581-1586
5. Carpenter CB: Long-term failure of renal transplants: Adding
insult to injury. Kidney Int Suppl 1995;50:S40-44
6. Collard CD, Gelman S: Pathophysiology, clinical manifesta-
tions, and prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Anes
thesiology 2001;94(6):1133-1138
7. Weight SC, Bell PR, Nicholson ML: Renal ischaemia-
reperfusion injury. Br J Surg 1996;83(2):162-170
8. Yang S, Chou WP, Pei L: Effects of propofol on renal ische-
mia/reperfusion injury in rats. Exp Ther Med 2013;6(5):1177-
1183
9. Wakamatsu TH, Dogru M, Tsubota K: Tearful relations:
Oxidative stress, inflammation and eye diseases. Arq Bras
Oftalmol 2008;71(6 Suppl):72-79
10. Cheng J, Zhang W, Zhang X, Li X, Chen J: Efficacy and safety
of paricalcitol therapy for chronic kidney disease: A meta-
analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012;7(3):391-400
11. Ross EA, Tian J, Abboud H, Hippensteel R, Melnick JZ,
Pradhan RS, Williams LA, Hamm LL, Sprague SM: Oral
paricalcitol for the treatment of secondary hyperparathy
roidism in patients on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.
Am J Nephrol 2008;28(1):97-106
12. Izquierdo MJ, Cavia M, Muñiz P, de Francisco AL, Arias
M, Santos J, Abaigar P: Paricalcitol reduces oxidative stress
and inflammation in hemodialysis patients. BMC Nephrol
2012;13:159
13. He W, Kang YS, Dai C, Liu Y: Blockade of Wnt/β-catenin
signaling by paricalcitol ameliorates proteinuria and kidney
injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;22(1):90-103
14. de Zeeuw D, Agarwal R, Amdahl M, Audhya P, Coyne D,
Garimella T, Parving HH, Pritchett Y, Remuzzi G, Ritz E,
Andress D: Selective vitamin D receptor activation with
paricalcitol for reduction of albuminuria in patients with
type 2 diabetes (VITAL study): A randomised controlled
trial. Lancet 2010;376(9752):1543-1551
15. Tan X, Li Y, Liu Y: Paricalcitol attenuates renal interstitial
fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;
17(12):3382-3393
16. Tan X, Wen X, Liu Y: Paricalcitol inhibits renal inflammation
by promoting vitamin D receptor-mediated sequestration
of NF-kappaB signaling. J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;19(9):1741-
1752
17. Esterbauer H, Cheeseman KH: Determination of aldehy-
dic lipid peroxidation products: malonaldehyde and 4-
hydroxynonenal. Methods Enzymol 1990;186:407-421
18. Erel O: A new automated colorimetric method for measur-
ing total oxidant status. Clin Biochem 2005;38:1103-1111
19. Erel O: A novel automated method to measure total anti-
oxidant response against potent free radical reactions. Clin
Biochem 2004;37:112-119
20. Orhan N, Özcan ME, Memişoğulları R, Uçgun T, Kayıkçı
MA, Demirin H: Oxidative stress and decrease of paroxo-
nase activity in patients with prostate cancer. Konuralp Tıp
Dergisi 2015;7(2):113-117
21. Yakut N, Yasa H, Bahriye Lafci B, Ortac R, Tulukoglu E,
Aksun M, Ozbek C, Gurbuz A: The influence of levosimen-
dan and iloprost on renal ischemia-reperfusion: An experi-
mental study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2008;7(2):235-
239
22. Silver SA, Cardinal H, Colwell K, Burger D, Dickhout JG:
Acute kidney injury: Preclinical innovations, challenges,
and opportunities for translation. Can J Kidney Health Dis
2015;2:30
23. Goldstein SL, Jaber BL, Faubel S, Chawla LS: Acute Kidney
Injury Advisory Group of American Society of Nephrology.
AKI transition of care: A potential opportunity to detect and
prevent CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;8(3):476-483
24. Park JW, Bae EH, Kim IJ, Ma SK, Choi C, Lee J, Kim
SW: Renoprotective effects of paricalcitol on gentamicin-
induced kidney injury in rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol
7. 60 Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology®
Aydin et al
2010;298(2):F301-313
25. Park JW, Cho JW, Joo SY, Kim CS, Choi JS, Bae EH, Ma
SK, Kim SH, Lee J, Kim SW: Paricalcitol prevents cisplatin-
induced renal injury by suppressing apoptosis and prolifera-
tion. Eur J Pharmacol 2012;683(1-3):301-309
26. Tanaka M, Tokunaga K, Komaba H, Itoh K, Matsushita
K, Watanabe H, Kadowaki D, Maruyama T, Otagiri M,
Fukagawa M: Vitamin D receptor activator reduces oxida
tive stress in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyper
parathyroidism. Ther Apher Dial 2011;15(2):161-168
27. Ari E, Kedrah AE, Alahdab Y, Bulut G, Eren Z, Baytekin
O, Odabasi D: Antioxidant and renoprotective effects of
paricalcitol on experimental contrast-induced nephropathy
model. Br J Radiol 2012;85(1016):1038-1043
28. Hwang HS, Yang KJ, Park KC, Choi HS, Kim SH, Hong SY,
Jeon BH, Chang YK, Park CW, Kim SY, Lee SJ, Yang CW:
Pretreatment with paricalcitol attenuates inflammation in
ischemia-reperfusion injury via the up-regulation of cyclo-
oxygenase-2 and prostaglandin E2. Nephrol Dial Transplant
2013;28(5):1156-1166
29. Lee JW, Kim SC, Ko YS, Lee HY, Cho E, Kim MG, Jo SK,
Cho WY, Kim HK: Renoprotective effect of paricalcitol via
a modulation of the TLR4-NF-κB pathway in ischemia/
reperfusion-induced acute kidney injury. Biochem Biophys
Res Commun 2014;444(2):121-127
30. Bagheri F, Gol A, Dabiri S, Javadi A: Preventive effect of
garlic juice on renal reperfusion injury. Iran J Kidney Dis
2011;5(3):194-200