American International University-Bangladesh(AIUB)
Faculty of Science and Technology
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS
PHYSICS LAB 1
Group:1 Section:C3
Lab report on Verification of Newton’s second
Law by Atwood machine
Supervised by:
Dr Muhammad Habib Ullah
Theory
 Newtons second law of motion tells that force causes
acceleration and the relationship between net force acting on
an object, Fnet and its acceleration, a is Fnet=ma, where (m) is
the mass of the object.
 In Atwood Machine , two masses m and M are suspended by
a piece of inelastic light string that passes over a pulley in a
vertical plane as shown in the figure below.The two masses
are connected with a string because of this they must have
same tension,T and acceleration, a.

 M1=less mass
 M2=more mass
Apparatus
1)Pulley
2)Two weight hangers
3)Meter scale
4)String
5)Stop watch
6)Stamp and lamp
Procedure
 The lighter mass(m1) was held on the floor while attached to an
end of the string. At height (D) from the floor, the heavier mass
(m2)was attached to the end of the string. The height (D) was
measured with a measuring scale.
 The string was run over the pulley in the vertical plain . The
whole system was then released. The time for the heavier mass to
fall onto the floor was measured.
 The experiment was ran for 7 different mass differences (M-m).It
was made sure that (m+M)=700g was constant.
 Excel was used to plot graph of the experimental data( a exp vs
M-m).Slope was set (g/(M-m)) and was solved for M+m.
Experimental Data
Graph of acceleration and mass
differences
Analysis and Calculation
Results
 The experimental results from the Atwood
machine strongly support Newton’s 2nd
law of
motion. The observed relationship between
force and acceleration was consistent with
theoretical expectations, demonstrating the
law’s validity in a real world setting
Discussion
 1)Readings might not have been taken to eye level here while
measuring height.
 2)Reaction time added some flaws and uncertainity.
 3)Take minimum 3 reading of time from stop watch and then
calculate mean to minimize errors.
 4)As there are a lot of variables calculation should be done
carefully.
 5)The string wasn’t moving freely because of some frictional
problem.

Presentation1.pptx physics1 lab experiment 1

  • 1.
    American International University-Bangladesh(AIUB) Facultyof Science and Technology DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS PHYSICS LAB 1 Group:1 Section:C3 Lab report on Verification of Newton’s second Law by Atwood machine Supervised by: Dr Muhammad Habib Ullah
  • 2.
    Theory  Newtons secondlaw of motion tells that force causes acceleration and the relationship between net force acting on an object, Fnet and its acceleration, a is Fnet=ma, where (m) is the mass of the object.  In Atwood Machine , two masses m and M are suspended by a piece of inelastic light string that passes over a pulley in a vertical plane as shown in the figure below.The two masses are connected with a string because of this they must have same tension,T and acceleration, a.   M1=less mass  M2=more mass
  • 4.
    Apparatus 1)Pulley 2)Two weight hangers 3)Meterscale 4)String 5)Stop watch 6)Stamp and lamp
  • 5.
    Procedure  The lightermass(m1) was held on the floor while attached to an end of the string. At height (D) from the floor, the heavier mass (m2)was attached to the end of the string. The height (D) was measured with a measuring scale.  The string was run over the pulley in the vertical plain . The whole system was then released. The time for the heavier mass to fall onto the floor was measured.  The experiment was ran for 7 different mass differences (M-m).It was made sure that (m+M)=700g was constant.  Excel was used to plot graph of the experimental data( a exp vs M-m).Slope was set (g/(M-m)) and was solved for M+m.
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Graph of accelerationand mass differences
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Results  The experimentalresults from the Atwood machine strongly support Newton’s 2nd law of motion. The observed relationship between force and acceleration was consistent with theoretical expectations, demonstrating the law’s validity in a real world setting
  • 10.
    Discussion  1)Readings mightnot have been taken to eye level here while measuring height.  2)Reaction time added some flaws and uncertainity.  3)Take minimum 3 reading of time from stop watch and then calculate mean to minimize errors.  4)As there are a lot of variables calculation should be done carefully.  5)The string wasn’t moving freely because of some frictional problem.