This document discusses considerations for developing effective IEPs for deaf or hard of hearing students that focus on language and communication. It emphasizes that language is essential to the human experience and communication is important for social and academic progress. The IEP team must carefully consider students' language, communication needs and auditory access when developing goals and determining services. The document provides examples of language and communication-focused IEP goals and components that should be included in every students' IEP, such as present levels, special education services, and assistive technology. It stresses the importance of developing IEPs that meet each deaf or hard of hearing student's individual needs.
EDUC 521
Final IEP Instructions
Review Elli Smith’s Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLAAFP) to complete your Final IEP assignment. To complete this assignment, fill in the Blank IEP provided (highlighted portions) as if this IEP meeting is occurring at the beginning of Elli’s 2nd grade year. Look for the instructions throughout the IEP and review the grading rubric for this assignment to make sure you complete all areas of the IEP.
You may use your course notes and textbook materials, but do not accept assistance from anyone in developing your Final IEP. Review the feedback from your IEP Goals in Module/Week 3 before completing this assignment. If these goals were approved, you can use this on this Final IEP assignment.
Read the report carefully. You must base your responses for the Final IEP on the information provided.
Submit the Final IEP via LiveText by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday of Module/Week 8.
EDUC 521
Elementary Individualized Education Program
Complete the Cover Page:
Student’s Name: Elli Smith
Grade: 2
Disability:
Date of IEP meeting:
(Use date at beginning of school year)
The IEP annual review must occur before:
Most recent evaluation date:
(Use date at beginning of school year)
Next re-evaluation (every 3 years) must occur before:
IEP Teacher/Manager (Your Name):
School: Liberty Elementary School
The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) that accompanies this document is meant to support the positive process and team approach. The IEP is a working document that outlines the student’s vision for the future, strengths, and needs. The IEP is not written in isolation. The intent of an IEP is to bring together a team of people who understand and support the student in order to come to a consensus on a plan and appropriate and effective education for the student. No two teams are alike, and each team will arrive at different answers, ideas, supports, and services to address the student’s unique needs. The student and his/her family members are vital participants, as well as teachers, assistants, specialists, outside service providers, and the principal. When all team members are present, the valuable information shared supports the development of a rich student profile and education plan.
Participants Involved
The list below indicates that the individual participated in the development of this IEP and the placement decision; it does not authorize consent. Parent consent is indicated on the “Prior Notice” page.
Include all participants that are required by IDEA to attend an IEP meeting.
Note: You can make up the names of the participants but the position must reflect the required participant positions according to IDEA.
Name of Participant
Position
Elementary Individualized Education Program
Factors for IEP Team Consideration
During the IEP meeting, the following factors must be considered by the IEP team. Best practice suggests that the IEP team documents that the factors were ...
Section 1: Lesson Preparation
Teacher Candidate Name:
Grade Level:
Unit/Subject:
Title of Unit and Brief Summary: Create a title for each lesson and 1-2 sentences summarizing the lesson, identifying the central focus based on the content and skills you are teaching.
Classroom and Student Factors/Grouping: Describe the important classroom factors (demographics and environment) and student factors (IEPs, 504s, ELLs, students with behavior concerns, gifted learners), and the effect of those factors on planning, teaching, and assessing students to facilitate learning for all students. This should be limited to 2-3 sentences and the information should inform the differentiation components of the lesson.
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
National/State Learning Standards
List specific grade-level standards that are the focus of the lesson being presented.
Specific Learning Target(s)/Objectives Based on state standards, identify what is intended to be measured in learning.
Academic Language General academic vocabulary and content-specific vocabulary included in the unit.
Unit Resources, Materials, Equipment, and Technology
List all resources, materials, equipment, and technology to be used in the unit.
Depth of Knowledge Lesson Questions
What questions can be posed throughout the lesson to assess all levels of student understanding?
· Level 1: Recall
· Level 2: Skill/Concepts
· Level 3: Strategic Thinking
· Level 4: Extended Thinking
Section 2: Instructional Planning
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Anticipatory Set
How will students’ prior knowledge be activated as well as gain student interest in the upcoming content?
Presentation of Content
Multiple Means of Representation
Describe how content will be presented in various ways to meet the needs of different learners.
Multiple Means of Representation Differentiation
Explain how materials will be differentiated for each of the following groups:
· English Language Learners (ELL)
· Students with special needs
· Students with gifted abilities
· Early finishers (those who finish early and may need additional sources/support)
Application of Content
Multiple Means of Engagement
How will students explore, practice, and apply the content?
Multiple Means of Engagement Differentiation
Explain how materials will be differentiated for each of the following groups:
· English Language Learners (ELL)
· Students with special needs
· Students with gifted abilities
· Early finishers (those who finish early and may need additional sources/support)
Assessment of Content
Multiple Means of Expression
Formative and summative assessments used to monitor student progress and modify instruction.
Multiple Means of Expression Differentiation
Explain how materials will be differentiated for each of the following groups:
· English Language Learners (ELL)
· Students with special needs
· Students with gifted abilities
· Early finishers (those who finish early and may need additional resources/support)
Be.
Section 1: Lesson Preparation
Teacher Candidate Name:
Grade Level:
Unit/Subject:
Title of Unit and Brief Summary: Create a title for each lesson and 1-2 sentences summarizing the lesson, identifying the central focus based on the content and skills you are teaching.
Classroom and Student Factors/Grouping: Describe the important classroom factors (demographics and environment) and student factors (IEPs, 504s, ELLs, students with behavior concerns, gifted learners), and the effect of those factors on planning, teaching, and assessing students to facilitate learning for all students. This should be limited to 2-3 sentences and the information should inform the differentiation components of the lesson.
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
National/State Learning Standards
List specific grade-level standards that are the focus of the lesson being presented.
Specific Learning Target(s)/Objectives Based on state standards, identify what is intended to be measured in learning.
Academic Language General academic vocabulary and content-specific vocabulary included in the unit.
Unit Resources, Materials, Equipment, and Technology
List all resources, materials, equipment, and technology to be used in the unit.
Depth of Knowledge Lesson Questions
What questions can be posed throughout the lesson to assess all levels of student understanding?
· Level 1: Recall
· Level 2: Skill/Concepts
· Level 3: Strategic Thinking
· Level 4: Extended Thinking
Section 2: Instructional Planning
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Anticipatory Set
How will students’ prior knowledge be activated as well as gain student interest in the upcoming content?
Presentation of Content
Multiple Means of Representation
Describe how content will be presented in various ways to meet the needs of different learners.
Multiple Means of Representation Differentiation
Explain how materials will be differentiated for each of the following groups:
· English Language Learners (ELL)
· Students with special needs
· Students with gifted abilities
· Early finishers (those who finish early and may need additional sources/support)
Application of Content
Multiple Means of Engagement
How will students explore, practice, and apply the content?
Multiple Means of Engagement Differentiation
Explain how materials will be differentiated for each of the following groups:
· English Language Learners (ELL)
· Students with special needs
· Students with gifted abilities
· Early finishers (those who finish early and may need additional sources/support)
Assessment of Content
Multiple Means of Expression
Formative and summative assessments used to monitor student progress and modify instruction.
Multiple Means of Expression Differentiation
Explain how materials will be differentiated for each of the following groups:
· English Language Learners (ELL)
· Students with special needs
· Students with gifted abilities
· Early finishers (those who finish early and may need additional resources/support)
Be.
Incorporate strategies for success in learning a second language. This slide show is connected to my presentation at the TESOL Convention, March 27, 2010.
Choosing to incorporate strategies for learning a second language leads to more success on the part of your students. These slides will provide you with ideas on how to achieve this goal and meet the national standards for teaching foreign language in the United States.
EDUC 521
Final IEP Instructions
Review Elli Smith’s Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLAAFP) to complete your Final IEP assignment. To complete this assignment, fill in the Blank IEP provided (highlighted portions) as if this IEP meeting is occurring at the beginning of Elli’s 2nd grade year. Look for the instructions throughout the IEP and review the grading rubric for this assignment to make sure you complete all areas of the IEP.
You may use your course notes and textbook materials, but do not accept assistance from anyone in developing your Final IEP. Review the feedback from your IEP Goals in Module/Week 3 before completing this assignment. If these goals were approved, you can use this on this Final IEP assignment.
Read the report carefully. You must base your responses for the Final IEP on the information provided.
Submit the Final IEP via LiveText by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday of Module/Week 8.
EDUC 521
Elementary Individualized Education Program
Complete the Cover Page:
Student’s Name: Elli Smith
Grade: 2
Disability:
Date of IEP meeting:
(Use date at beginning of school year)
The IEP annual review must occur before:
Most recent evaluation date:
(Use date at beginning of school year)
Next re-evaluation (every 3 years) must occur before:
IEP Teacher/Manager (Your Name):
School: Liberty Elementary School
The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) that accompanies this document is meant to support the positive process and team approach. The IEP is a working document that outlines the student’s vision for the future, strengths, and needs. The IEP is not written in isolation. The intent of an IEP is to bring together a team of people who understand and support the student in order to come to a consensus on a plan and appropriate and effective education for the student. No two teams are alike, and each team will arrive at different answers, ideas, supports, and services to address the student’s unique needs. The student and his/her family members are vital participants, as well as teachers, assistants, specialists, outside service providers, and the principal. When all team members are present, the valuable information shared supports the development of a rich student profile and education plan.
Participants Involved
The list below indicates that the individual participated in the development of this IEP and the placement decision; it does not authorize consent. Parent consent is indicated on the “Prior Notice” page.
Include all participants that are required by IDEA to attend an IEP meeting.
Note: You can make up the names of the participants but the position must reflect the required participant positions according to IDEA.
Name of Participant
Position
Elementary Individualized Education Program
Factors for IEP Team Consideration
During the IEP meeting, the following factors must be considered by the IEP team. Best practice suggests that the IEP team documents that the factors were ...
Section 1: Lesson Preparation
Teacher Candidate Name:
Grade Level:
Unit/Subject:
Title of Unit and Brief Summary: Create a title for each lesson and 1-2 sentences summarizing the lesson, identifying the central focus based on the content and skills you are teaching.
Classroom and Student Factors/Grouping: Describe the important classroom factors (demographics and environment) and student factors (IEPs, 504s, ELLs, students with behavior concerns, gifted learners), and the effect of those factors on planning, teaching, and assessing students to facilitate learning for all students. This should be limited to 2-3 sentences and the information should inform the differentiation components of the lesson.
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
National/State Learning Standards
List specific grade-level standards that are the focus of the lesson being presented.
Specific Learning Target(s)/Objectives Based on state standards, identify what is intended to be measured in learning.
Academic Language General academic vocabulary and content-specific vocabulary included in the unit.
Unit Resources, Materials, Equipment, and Technology
List all resources, materials, equipment, and technology to be used in the unit.
Depth of Knowledge Lesson Questions
What questions can be posed throughout the lesson to assess all levels of student understanding?
· Level 1: Recall
· Level 2: Skill/Concepts
· Level 3: Strategic Thinking
· Level 4: Extended Thinking
Section 2: Instructional Planning
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Anticipatory Set
How will students’ prior knowledge be activated as well as gain student interest in the upcoming content?
Presentation of Content
Multiple Means of Representation
Describe how content will be presented in various ways to meet the needs of different learners.
Multiple Means of Representation Differentiation
Explain how materials will be differentiated for each of the following groups:
· English Language Learners (ELL)
· Students with special needs
· Students with gifted abilities
· Early finishers (those who finish early and may need additional sources/support)
Application of Content
Multiple Means of Engagement
How will students explore, practice, and apply the content?
Multiple Means of Engagement Differentiation
Explain how materials will be differentiated for each of the following groups:
· English Language Learners (ELL)
· Students with special needs
· Students with gifted abilities
· Early finishers (those who finish early and may need additional sources/support)
Assessment of Content
Multiple Means of Expression
Formative and summative assessments used to monitor student progress and modify instruction.
Multiple Means of Expression Differentiation
Explain how materials will be differentiated for each of the following groups:
· English Language Learners (ELL)
· Students with special needs
· Students with gifted abilities
· Early finishers (those who finish early and may need additional resources/support)
Be.
Section 1: Lesson Preparation
Teacher Candidate Name:
Grade Level:
Unit/Subject:
Title of Unit and Brief Summary: Create a title for each lesson and 1-2 sentences summarizing the lesson, identifying the central focus based on the content and skills you are teaching.
Classroom and Student Factors/Grouping: Describe the important classroom factors (demographics and environment) and student factors (IEPs, 504s, ELLs, students with behavior concerns, gifted learners), and the effect of those factors on planning, teaching, and assessing students to facilitate learning for all students. This should be limited to 2-3 sentences and the information should inform the differentiation components of the lesson.
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
National/State Learning Standards
List specific grade-level standards that are the focus of the lesson being presented.
Specific Learning Target(s)/Objectives Based on state standards, identify what is intended to be measured in learning.
Academic Language General academic vocabulary and content-specific vocabulary included in the unit.
Unit Resources, Materials, Equipment, and Technology
List all resources, materials, equipment, and technology to be used in the unit.
Depth of Knowledge Lesson Questions
What questions can be posed throughout the lesson to assess all levels of student understanding?
· Level 1: Recall
· Level 2: Skill/Concepts
· Level 3: Strategic Thinking
· Level 4: Extended Thinking
Section 2: Instructional Planning
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Anticipatory Set
How will students’ prior knowledge be activated as well as gain student interest in the upcoming content?
Presentation of Content
Multiple Means of Representation
Describe how content will be presented in various ways to meet the needs of different learners.
Multiple Means of Representation Differentiation
Explain how materials will be differentiated for each of the following groups:
· English Language Learners (ELL)
· Students with special needs
· Students with gifted abilities
· Early finishers (those who finish early and may need additional sources/support)
Application of Content
Multiple Means of Engagement
How will students explore, practice, and apply the content?
Multiple Means of Engagement Differentiation
Explain how materials will be differentiated for each of the following groups:
· English Language Learners (ELL)
· Students with special needs
· Students with gifted abilities
· Early finishers (those who finish early and may need additional sources/support)
Assessment of Content
Multiple Means of Expression
Formative and summative assessments used to monitor student progress and modify instruction.
Multiple Means of Expression Differentiation
Explain how materials will be differentiated for each of the following groups:
· English Language Learners (ELL)
· Students with special needs
· Students with gifted abilities
· Early finishers (those who finish early and may need additional resources/support)
Be.
Incorporate strategies for success in learning a second language. This slide show is connected to my presentation at the TESOL Convention, March 27, 2010.
Choosing to incorporate strategies for learning a second language leads to more success on the part of your students. These slides will provide you with ideas on how to achieve this goal and meet the national standards for teaching foreign language in the United States.
Estimados usuarios.
Bienvenidos a nuestro sitio virtual de la UNIVERSIDAD MAGISTER en Slide Share donde podrá encontrar los resultados de importantes trabajos de investigación prácticos producidos por nuestros profesionales. Esperamos que estos Mares Azules que les ponemos a su disposición sirvan de base para otras investigaciones y juntos cooperemos en el Desarrollo Económico y Social de Costa Rica y otras latitudes.
Queremos ser enfáticos en que estos trabajos tienen Propiedad Intelectual por lo que queda totalmente prohibida su reproducción parcial o total, así como ser utilizados por otro autor, a excepción de que los compartan como citas de autor o referencias bibliográficas. Toda esta información también quedará a su disposición desde nuestro sitio web www.umagister.com,
Disfruten con nosotros de este magno contenido bibliográfico Magister esperando sus amables comentarios, no sin antes agradecer a nuestro Ing. Jerry González quien está administrando este sitio.
Rectoría, Universidad Magister. – 2014.
Estimados usuarios. Bienvenidos a nuestro sitio virtual de la UNIVERSIDAD MAGISTER en Slide Share donde podrá encontrar los resultados de importantes trabajos de investigación prácticos producidos por nuestros profesionales. Esperamos que estos Mares Azules que les ponemos a su disposición sirvan de base para otras investigaciones y juntos cooperemos en el Desarrollo Económico y Social de Costa Rica y otras latitudes. Queremos ser enfáticos en que estos trabajos tienen Propiedad Intelectual por lo que queda totalmente prohibida su reproducción parcial o total, así como ser utilizados por otro autor, a excepción de que los compartan como citas de autor o referencias bibliográficas. Toda esta información también quedará a su disposición desde nuestro sitio web www.umagister.com, Disfruten con nosotros de este magno contenido bibliográfico Magister esperando sus amables comentarios, no sin antes agradecer a nuestro Ing. Jerry González quien está administrando este sitio. Rectoría, Universidad Magister. – 2016.
best" publication may vary from person to person, depending on their interests and needs. The key is to explore different publications within your area of interest and find the ones that resonate with you the most. Each of these publications offers a unique perspective and a commitment to excellence in its respective genre, making them worthy of exploration.
science journals is essential for staying informed about the latest developments in your field of interest. The journals mentioned above are among the best in their respective disciplines, offering valuable insights and research findings. Remember that the choice of journal should align with your specific research area and goals, so it's essential to explore the journals that best serve your needs and interests.
This is an abbreviated version of Dr. Collier's slideshow for her Keynote presentation at the Oregon Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages conference in Portland, Oregon, November 15, 2014.
LANGUAGE LEARNING NEEDS OF FILIPINO-CHINESE LEARNERS AS INPUTS FOR THE PROP...CarloMedoranda
This descriptive research aimed to identify the objective and subjective learning needs of grades 4 – 6 elementary school learners of Bayanihan Institute. It also looked into the most and least important needs of the learners, proposed intervention program to enhance English instruction in the school, and determined the implications of the research findings to the teaching of English as a second language to the young Filipino-Chinese learners.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Estimados usuarios.
Bienvenidos a nuestro sitio virtual de la UNIVERSIDAD MAGISTER en Slide Share donde podrá encontrar los resultados de importantes trabajos de investigación prácticos producidos por nuestros profesionales. Esperamos que estos Mares Azules que les ponemos a su disposición sirvan de base para otras investigaciones y juntos cooperemos en el Desarrollo Económico y Social de Costa Rica y otras latitudes.
Queremos ser enfáticos en que estos trabajos tienen Propiedad Intelectual por lo que queda totalmente prohibida su reproducción parcial o total, así como ser utilizados por otro autor, a excepción de que los compartan como citas de autor o referencias bibliográficas. Toda esta información también quedará a su disposición desde nuestro sitio web www.umagister.com,
Disfruten con nosotros de este magno contenido bibliográfico Magister esperando sus amables comentarios, no sin antes agradecer a nuestro Ing. Jerry González quien está administrando este sitio.
Rectoría, Universidad Magister. – 2014.
Estimados usuarios. Bienvenidos a nuestro sitio virtual de la UNIVERSIDAD MAGISTER en Slide Share donde podrá encontrar los resultados de importantes trabajos de investigación prácticos producidos por nuestros profesionales. Esperamos que estos Mares Azules que les ponemos a su disposición sirvan de base para otras investigaciones y juntos cooperemos en el Desarrollo Económico y Social de Costa Rica y otras latitudes. Queremos ser enfáticos en que estos trabajos tienen Propiedad Intelectual por lo que queda totalmente prohibida su reproducción parcial o total, así como ser utilizados por otro autor, a excepción de que los compartan como citas de autor o referencias bibliográficas. Toda esta información también quedará a su disposición desde nuestro sitio web www.umagister.com, Disfruten con nosotros de este magno contenido bibliográfico Magister esperando sus amables comentarios, no sin antes agradecer a nuestro Ing. Jerry González quien está administrando este sitio. Rectoría, Universidad Magister. – 2016.
best" publication may vary from person to person, depending on their interests and needs. The key is to explore different publications within your area of interest and find the ones that resonate with you the most. Each of these publications offers a unique perspective and a commitment to excellence in its respective genre, making them worthy of exploration.
science journals is essential for staying informed about the latest developments in your field of interest. The journals mentioned above are among the best in their respective disciplines, offering valuable insights and research findings. Remember that the choice of journal should align with your specific research area and goals, so it's essential to explore the journals that best serve your needs and interests.
This is an abbreviated version of Dr. Collier's slideshow for her Keynote presentation at the Oregon Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages conference in Portland, Oregon, November 15, 2014.
LANGUAGE LEARNING NEEDS OF FILIPINO-CHINESE LEARNERS AS INPUTS FOR THE PROP...CarloMedoranda
This descriptive research aimed to identify the objective and subjective learning needs of grades 4 – 6 elementary school learners of Bayanihan Institute. It also looked into the most and least important needs of the learners, proposed intervention program to enhance English instruction in the school, and determined the implications of the research findings to the teaching of English as a second language to the young Filipino-Chinese learners.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
2. CONTENTS:
Analyze the important considerations in determining the instructional
content for Students
Instructional Content with sample IEP for Deaf and Hard of Hearing
4. Language is central to the human
experience. Communication is essential
for social and academic progress.
5. Members of the IEP team must consider the
need for language and communication-
focused IEP goals as well as
the significance of compromised or lack of
auditory access to communication.
It is important that teams carefully
consider these needs and that communication
access be considered a major factor in all
areas of the IEP and during the educational
experience.
6. Special Factors IV from the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)
highlights the following:
◦ consider the communication needs of the
child, and in the case of the child who is
deaf or hard of hearing, consider the
child’s language and communication
needs, opportunities for direct
communications with peers and
professional personnel in the child’s
language and communication mode,
academic level, and full range of needs,
including opportunities for direct
instruction in the child’s language and
communication mode.
7. for Deaf and Hard
of hearing
includes:
presenting a clear picture of the student's fluency in
language compared to his/her peers,
the mode of communication used by the student both at
home and school,
the optimal instructional language system, and the optimal
social language system.
8. The FIVE primary questions will ensure
that the IEP requirements are considered
and addressed for each student’s
individual needs.
9. 5 Primary Questions:
1. What is the student’s primary language and
communication mode at home and school?
10.
11. 5 Primary Questions:
2. How does the student’s degree of hearing affect his
or her language and
communication access?
12.
13. 5 Primary Questions:
3. What are the opportunities for direct communication
and instruction in the student’s primary
language/communication mode?
14.
15.
16. 5 Primary Questions:
4. What specific data is available regarding the student’s
present level of
academic and social language? For students with co-occurring
disabilities, what is the range of language and communication
needs and abilities?
17.
18.
19. 5 Primary Questions:
5. What other educationally relevant needs resulting
from the student’s hearing loss must be addressed?
20.
21. Addressing each of the five primary questions will ensure
that the IEP requirements are considered and addressed for
each student’s individual needs. The questions
incorporate IEP language-based goals, specialized instruction,
accommodations, and specialized needs.
22. Components that every IEP should
contain are:
IEP goals, benchmarks, and objectives
Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLAAFP)
Special education services, including the time, frequency and location
Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)
Assistive Technology
23. I. Examples of IEP Goals
for Students with Hearing
Loss
Goal 1: Developing effective communication skills
Objective: The student will improve their ability to understand and express themselves in various
communication settings.
Example: The student will accurately follow multi-step instructions given verbally in the classroom
setting with 80% accuracy by the end of the school year.
24. Goal 2: Building self-advocacy and self-
confidence
◦ Objective: The student will develop the skills and confidence to
advocate for their needs and actively participate in their educational
journey.
◦ Example: The student will independently request accommodations or
modifications when needed in the classroom setting in 90% of
opportunities by the end of the school year.
25. Goal 3: Enhancing social skills and peer
relationships
◦ Objective: The student will improve their ability to initiate and
maintain positive relationships with peers.
◦ Example: The student will engage in reciprocal conversations
with peers during structured social activities with 75%
accuracy by the end of the school year.
26. II. Developing a Present Level of Academic
Achievement & Functional
Performance (PLAAFP) Statement
In the very first paragraph of the PLAAFP a few key main points need to be included:
• a brief synopsis of the student's hearing loss,
◦ language of instruction and home language (when applicable)
◦ educational history/background and
◦ impact of the disability on language development and/or curricular areas.
A statement referring to the Communication and Language Checklist in the IEP helps the team make a
connection between the student’s current communication access and ability and needed services and
adaptations.